Marginality, Climate and Resources in Pastoral Rangelands: Oman and Mongolia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Marginality, Climate and Resources in Pastoral Rangelands: Oman and Mongolia Item Type text; Article Authors Sternberg, Troy; Chatty, Dawn Citation Sternberg, T., & Chatty, D. (2016). Marginality, Climate and Resources in Pastoral Rangelands: Oman and Mongolia. Rangelands, 38(3), 145-151. DOI 10.1016/j.rala.2016.03.001 Publisher Society for Range Management Journal Rangelands Rights Copyright © Society for Range Management. Download date 27/09/2021 07:01:42 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Version Final published version Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/640140 Marginality, Climate and Resources in Pastoral Rangelands: Oman and Mongolia By Troy Sternberg and Dawn Chatty livelihoods.5 In both countries, governments encourage On the Ground settlement or provide limited support for customary lifestyles • Oman and Mongolia feature different political whilst favoring extractive industries for tax revenue. As systems and physical landscapes yet represent climate, policy, and extraction affect pasture quality, water similar challenges encountered across global resources, and the rural landscape, these forces contribute to pastoral societies. loss of livelihoods and herder displacement. Yet the • Extractive industries disrupt pastoral drylands knowledge, adaptability, and resilience of pastoral livelihoods through reorienting government policy, environmen- suggest their enduring value in an era of environmental and tal change, altered water supply, and infrastructure socio-economic change.6,7 Our article explores these con- factors that challenge livelihood viability. temporary dynamics in the two traditional pastoral societies. • The impact of climate variability on rangeland Pastoralism is prevalent in dryland regions where domes- livelihoods is now exacerbated by policy and ticated animals efficiently convert limited ecological produc- development decisions. tivity into sustenance for people. Climate variability • Herder livelihoods at different income and devel- significantly impacts livestock raising and human well-being opment levels are dependent on government policy in rangelands where mobile herding provides effective and risk mitigation strategies to maintain customary management of environmental risk.4 Furthermore, shifts in practices. governance and the reorganization of pastoralism due to • The combination of multiple external forces stress socio-economic pressures are often confronted with mining rural viability and contribute to out-migration from and large-scale resource extraction that competes for, and herding systems. reconfigures, the land that pastoralists inhabit.8 This dynamic has the effect of changing land use, re-directing government Keywords: pastoralism, rangelands, climate, policy, and altering herder access to pasture and water while resources, Oman, Mongolia. potentially degrading the landscape and removing pastoral peoples’ customary tenure rights.7 The immediacy of climate Rangelands 38(3):145—151 change and development policy is evidenced by how the doi: 10.1016/j.rala.2016.03.001 resulting metamorphosis disorders pastoral communities’ © 2016 The Society for Range Management herding practices and traditions. As the ability to make a living from animals is affected by drought, extreme cold, or millennia, nomadic pastoralism has been a storms, degradation, and reduced vegetation, access for sustainable livelihood because of herders’ ability to livestock herding may become unviable.9 The result is F manage risk in marginal landscapes.1 Today’s out-migration first from traditional homelands, then to mobile pastoralism is being seriously impacted by towns, and finally abandonment of herding as a livelihood new environmental and social forces, exemplified by climate to search for jobs in cities. change, government policy, and resource extraction, which Pastoral environments have long been home to subsistence restrict movement and customary livelihoods.2 As pastoral herders in marginal arid and semi-arid landscapes. Today 200 risk magnifies, understanding of how climate trends, evolving million people, predominantly in Africa, the Middle East, and herding practices, and national planning strategies affect the Asia, use herding to create lives based on extensive land use viability of pastoral systems across the globe becomes vital.3,4 and mobility.10 Great changes in environmental and Two nations where pastoralism is prominent, Oman and socio-economic conditions are prevalent across pastoral Mongolia, reflect the modern challenges to mobile societies as states seek to balance divergent risks, interests, 2016 145 ’ and objectives. Herders struggles with climate change, Table 1. Selected social indicators and data environmental variability, and livelihood transitions are related to Oman and Mongolia17 exemplified in diverse nations such as Iran, China, and Kyrgyzstan, through Kenya, South Sudan, Mali, and Senegal Indicator Oman Mongolia 4 to Peru and Bolivia. Warming trends, extreme weather Herders, % 7 N30 events, and greater volatility typify changing climates across Population (million) 3 2.9 pastoral regions. Balancing the fundamentals of herding with changes in climate and development is a great social and GDP (PPP) p/c 23,133 3,673 political challenge. Further, pastoralism is commonly per- Government Autocratic Democratic ceived as a marginal, backward livelihood, leading govern- Arable land, 0.04 0.16 ments to stress settlement and integration through policy, ha p/c services, and control measures.11 As pastoralism, climate, and development become part of an unsettled present, we examine Malnutrition rate 8.6 5.8 the trajectories, challenges, and possibilities in Oman and Food, % income 30 38.6 Mongolia, two societies where pastoralism was once the Food import, 70 30 dominant livelihood. The countries represent two divergent % total transition arcs. Oman is a sultanate where nation-building and oil-fueled development has transformed Omani society over Mean 139 204 the last four decades. During this time pastoralism has precipitation, mm remained a subsistence economy while its significance has Mean 28 0 declined. Since 1991, Mongolia has embraced a market temperature,¯C economy and parliamentary democracy. Today a vibrant civil Animal type Goat, camel, Sheep, goat, society coexists with high (36%) poverty levels. In the vast sheep horse, camel, steppe environment more than 30% of the population remains cattle dependent on herding (Fig. 1). p/c indicates per capita. Sources: CIA Factbook 2013, related sources. Climate and Pastoralism Changing climates have a significant influence on pastoralists who pursue environmentally dependent sub-surface water sources are vital to herding viability.3 As livelihoods.12 In harsh hot and cold landscapes the ability to pastoral sustainability is jeopardized, food provision, jobs, obtain adequate fodder to fatten animals is the endemic social stability, and even state security become concerns as challenge. Shifts in weather patterns, seasonality of precipi- reflected in recent protests in Oman13 and Mongolia14 tation, moisture for plant forage growth, and recharge of (Table 1). In Oman a 0.6°C annual temperature increase and a Figure 1. Oman (left) with main pastoral tribes (312,000 km2, avg. temperature 28¯ C). Mongolia (above) main mining areas (1.56 million km2, avg. temperature 0¯ C). 146 Rangelands Figure 2. Omani herder; government-issued tent home. 21% decrease in precipitation from 1990–2008 has intensified 1.6 persons in 2001, and 2 in 2010.19 On average, 57% of water scarcity and increased evapotranspiration in the pastoral household income is derived from paid employment and the interior. This has reduced ecological productivity essential remainder from livestock sales. Thus, pastoralism in this to the animals upon which herders depend; concurrently region has remained subsistence; it has not moved towards a the country has experienced catastrophic storm episodes market economy. ($5 billion in losses in 2007, 2010). Restriction on movement Key to understanding the pastoral migratory system of and water access as a result of extractive industry infrastructure Omani herders is knowledge of the temporal and spatial limits herder ability to maximize ecological knowledge and variability in rainfall, which can be dramatic in hyper-arid requires the purchase of fodder and water delivery for livestock deserts such as central Oman.20 Years go by with rainfall in survival. Mongolia has experienced a 2°C warming trend since one region and not in a neighboring one. With little and 1940, recurrent drought, changes in precipitation, seasonality, highly variable rainfall, large areas are needed to support a and reduced water sources.15 Severe temperature (to -50°C) relatively small herding population. It is inevitable then that contributed to 2010’s extreme winter event (dzud), the most areas will be seldom used because of local drought. As in nation’s ‘worst-ever’ disaster,15 that killed 25% of the Mongolia, what might seem as an un-used site by a country’s livestock as 3% of herders lost their livelihood.9,16 non-pastoralist is nevertheless an important part of the overall The resultant rural poverty and out-migration to cities pastoral economy and land tenure systems. The oil extractive manifests the detrimental impact of a changing climate. industry in Oman operates largely in these same hyper-arid Today pastoralists in Oman make up between 7–10% of deserts resulting in serious challenges to the resilience of the national population.18