Giovanni Antonio Canal (1697-1768)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Second Miracle at Cana: Recent Musical Discoveries in Veronese's Wedding Feast
BASSANO 11 A SECOND MIRACLE AT CANA: RECENT MUSICAL DISCOVERIES IN VERONESE'S WEDDING FEAST Peter Bossano 1.And the third day there was a marriage in Cana of Galilee; and the mother of Jesus was there: 2. And both Jesus was called, and his disciples, to the marriage. 3. And when they wanted wine, the mother of Jesus saith unto him, They have no wine. 4. Jesus saith unto her, Woman what have I to do with thee? mine hour is not yet come. 5. His mother saith unto the servants, Whatsoever he saith unto you, do it. 6. And there were set there six waterpots of stone, after the manner of the purifying of the Jews, containing two or three firkins apiece. 7. Jesus saith unto them, Fill the waterpots with water. And they filled them up to the brim. 8. And he saith unto them, Draw out now, and bear unto the governor of the feast. And they bare it. 9. When the ruler of the feast had tasted the water that was made wine, and knew not whence it was: (but the servants which drew the water knew;) the governor of the feast called the bridegroom, 10.And saith unto him, Every man at the beginning doth set forth good wine; and when men have well drunk, then that which is worst; but thou hast kept the good wine until now. —John 2: 1-10 (KingJames Version) In Paolo Veronese's painting of the Wedding Feast at Cana, as in St. John's version of this story, not everything is as at seems. -
Annotazioni E Aggiunte Al Catalogo Di Pietro Negri, Pittore « Del Chiaro Giorno Alquanto Nemico » Seconda Parte
Annotazioni e aggiunte al catalogo di Pietro Negri, pittore « del chiaro giorno alquanto nemico » seconda parte Giorgio Fossaluzza Riguardo alla prima metà degli anni sessanta offrono un completamento d’in- dicazioni sulla posizione stilistica di Pietro Negri e il contesto della sua opera- tività veneziana i disegni raccolti nel cosiddetto Album di Camerino, che è stato conservato presso l’Archivio parrocchiale di Santa Maria in Via e ora fa parte delle raccolte del Museo Arcidiocesano Giacomo Boccanera della città marchi- giana.1 Sono annoverati ben quattro importanti fogli che la scritta antica assegna La prima parte di questo contributo è stata pubblicata in « Verona Illustrata », 23, 2010, pp. 71-90. Un devoto e sincero ringraziamento a mons. Francesco Giovanni Brugnaro, arcivescovo di Camerino - San Severino Marche, per la generosa e collaborativa sollecitazione allo studio e valorizzazione dell’Album di Camerino. Questo contributo può vedere la luce anche grazie alla collaborazione del prof. Pier Luigi Fala- schi, direttore del Museo Arcidiocesano di Camerino. Mi è gradito dedicarglielo, quale cordiale omaggio e segno di amicizia. 1. La menzione e illustrazione dei disegni di Negri appartenenti a tale raccolta si trova in P. Zampetti, Note sparse sul ’600, Venezia 1967, p. 28 nota 23; Idem, Un quaderno di disegni a Camerino, « Notizie da Palazzo Albani », iii, 2/3, 1974, pp. 48-50; E.A. Safarik, Per la pittura veneta del Seicento: Francesco Ru- schi, « Römische Jahrbuch für Kunstgeschichte », 16, 1976, p. 338, nota 112; Idem, Pietro Negri, « Saggi e Memorie di Storia dell’Arte », 11, 1978, p. 83, note 2-3, fig. 1; P. -
Boschini E Il Restauro, Fra Tutela E Mercato
Fig. 91. Giorgione, Pala di Castelfranco, radiografia. 306 Boschini e il restauro, fra tutela e mercato Monica Molteni Un bel zardin no’ valerave niente, Se no ghe fusse un zardinier perfeto, Che dale ortiche el mantegnisse neto: El saria un bosco in breve certamente. Che cosa valerave un Arsenal Pien de armadure de molto valor, Se qualcun no netasse con amor El ruzene nemigo a quel metal? Ma meglio: che remedio, e che partio Sarave per drezzar chi havesse smosso De liogo, o roto per desgracia, un osso, Senza el Barbier de San Bartolamio?1 Ai fini della messa a fuoco del punto di vista di Boschini sul tema del restauro il passo della Carta (1660) citato è indubbiamente altamente esemplare, poiché l’elenco di beni – compreso lo stesso corpo umano – la cui buona conservazione dipende dalla costante erogazione di cure amorevoli e professionali qui sciorinato è sostanzialmente finalizzato a rafforzare il concetto espresso nella quartina precedente, e cioè che in una città come Venezia, «dove gh’è milioni de Piture», se non vi fossero «degne cure. / La sarave una pena manifesta»2. Nella lapidarietà di siffatta affermazione traspare in filigra- na uno dei motivi fondamentali sottesi all’intero poema, ovvero l’orgogliosa coscien- za dell’esistenza di un capitale artistico rappresentato dalla grande pittura del passato, particolarmente cinquecentesca, che è al contempo ricchissimo e fragilissimo, e ha un valore inestimabile in quanto elemento fondante dell’identità culturale veneziana: la cui tutela è dunque un atto materiale dovuto, necessitato dal senso di responsabilità morale che il possesso consapevole di un bene di pregio incorpora. -
An Examination of the Artist's Depiction of the City and Its Gardens 1745-1756
Durham E-Theses Public and private space in Canaletto's London: An examination of the artist's depiction of the city and its gardens 1745-1756 Hudson, Ferne Olivia How to cite: Hudson, Ferne Olivia (2000) Public and private space in Canaletto's London: An examination of the artist's depiction of the city and its gardens 1745-1756, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4252/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Public and Private Space in Canaletto's London. An Examination of the Artist's Depiction of the City and its Gardens 1745-1756. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published in any form, including Electronic and the Internet, without the author's prior written consent. -
Collaboration and Originality in Early Modern Art
Lindenwood University Digital Commons@Lindenwood University Faculty Research Papers Research, Scholarship, and Resources 8-2020 L’abbiam Fatta Tutti Noi: Collaboration and Originality in Early Modern Art James Hutson Lindenwood University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lindenwood.edu/faculty-research-papers Part of the Art and Design Commons Recommended Citation Hutson, James, "L’abbiam Fatta Tutti Noi: Collaboration and Originality in Early Modern Art" (2020). Faculty Research Papers. 4. https://digitalcommons.lindenwood.edu/faculty-research-papers/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Research, Scholarship, and Resources at Digital Commons@Lindenwood University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Research Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Lindenwood University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Art and Design Review, 2020, 8, *-* https://www.scirp.org/journal/adr ISSN Online: 2332-2004 ISSN Print: 2332-1997 L’abbiam Fatta Tutti Noi: Collaboration and Originality in Early Modern Art James Hutson Art History Department, Lindenwood University, St. Charles, MO, USA Email: [email protected] How to cite this paper: Author 1, Author Abstract 2, & Author 3 (2020). Paper Title. Art and Design Review, 8, **-**. This article seeks a reevaluation of the collaborative efforts and critical valua- https://doi.org/10.4236/***.2020.***** tion of the Carracci in the frescoes of the Palazzo Magnani. While the signi- ficance of the cycle for the development of the nascent baroque style is de- Received: **** **, *** Accepted: **** **, *** monstrable, criticism has focused on attributional issues and the works re- Published: **** **, *** main understudied. Since their original biographers struggled over identify- ing which Carracci was responsible for which scene in the frieze, efforts have Copyright © 2020 by author(s) and been made to carefully dissect the contributions of each. -
The Evolution of Landscape in Venetian Painting, 1475-1525
THE EVOLUTION OF LANDSCAPE IN VENETIAN PAINTING, 1475-1525 by James Reynolds Jewitt BA in Art History, Hartwick College, 2006 BA in English, Hartwick College, 2006 MA, University of Pittsburgh, 2009 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2014 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH KENNETH P. DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by James Reynolds Jewitt It was defended on April 7, 2014 and approved by C. Drew Armstrong, Associate Professor, History of Art and Architecture Kirk Savage, Professor, History of Art and Architecture Jennifer Waldron, Associate Professor, Department of English Dissertation Advisor: Ann Sutherland Harris, Professor Emerita, History of Art and Architecture ii Copyright © by James Reynolds Jewitt 2014 iii THE EVOLUTION OF LANDSCAPE IN VENETIAN PAINTING, 1475-1525 James R. Jewitt, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2014 Landscape painting assumed a new prominence in Venetian painting between the late fifteenth to early sixteenth century: this study aims to understand why and how this happened. It begins by redefining the conception of landscape in Renaissance Italy and then examines several ambitious easel paintings produced by major Venetian painters, beginning with Giovanni Bellini’s (c.1431- 36-1516) St. Francis in the Desert (c.1475), that give landscape a far more significant role than previously seen in comparable commissions by their peers, or even in their own work. After an introductory chapter reconsidering all previous hypotheses regarding Venetian painters’ reputations as accomplished landscape painters, it is divided into four chronologically arranged case study chapters. -
Titolo Le Alterne Fortune Critiche Di Domenico Maria Federici
Corso di Laurea (vecchio ordinamento, ante D.M. 509/1999) in Lettere Tesi di Laurea Titolo Le alterne fortune critiche di Domenico Maria Federici Relatore Ch. Prof. Sergio Marinelli Correlatore Dott. Maria Grazia Piva Laureando Silvano Zambotti Matricola 733234 Anno Accademico 2011 / 2012 1 INDICE Capitolo primo p. 2 Introduzione p. 8 I. Federici e il suo tempo p. 23 II. La “Istoria dei Cavalieri Gaudenti” p. 27 III. Le “Memorie Trevigiane sulla Tipografia nel secolo XV” p. 33 IV. “Della Letteratura Trevigiana del secolo XVIII sino ai nostri giorni” p. 41 V. “Il Convito Borgiano” Capitolo secondo – L’Epistolario p. 45 I. Arte p. 47 II. Convito Borgiano p. 60 III. Critica p. 65 IV. Temi riconducibili all’illuminismo p. 73 V. Lettere di eruditi famosi p. 98 VI. Argomenti vari p. 132 VII. Guerra Capitolo terzo p. 134 Premessa alle “Memorie Trevigiane sulle Opere del Disegno” p. 141 Analisi delle “Memorie Trevigiane sulle Opere del Disegno”. Volume primo: dal 1100 al 1500 Capitolo quarto p. 173 Analisi delle “Memorie Trevigiane sulle opere di Disegno”. Volume secondo: dal 1500 al 1800 p. 259 Conclusioni p. 263 Cronologia della vita e delle opere p. 271 Bibliografia 2 I N T R O D U Z I O N E L’iniziale analisi critica delle opere prodotte da Domenico Maria Federici proviene essenzialmente da due fonti profondamente diverse fra loro. Ambedue però sono piuttosto fuorvianti quando pretendono di gettare una luce obiettiva su di esse. Mentre la prima fonte , che è poi quella del nipote Luigi, tende ad esprimersi in termini incondizionatamente encomiastici, quasi a volerci rendere una visione agiografica, la seconda invece è tutta tesa alla denigrazione ed al misconoscimento, mostrando le irte ed aspre durezze del biografo malevolo, stigmatizzando oltremodo i difetti presenti nell’opera di Federici. -
Afat-32-Def.Pdf
AFAT UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI TRIESTE Dipartimento di Studi Umanistici AFAT Direttore Giuseppe Pavanello Comitato scientifico AFAT Giovanni Bianchi • Massimo Bisson • Barbara Boccazzi Mazza • Enrica Cozzi • Alberto Craievich • Daniele D’Anza • Roberto De Feo • Massimo De Grassi • Simone Ferrari • Lorenzo Finocchi Ghersi • Matteo Gardonio • Ludovico Geymonat • Vania Gransinigh • Milijenko Jurkovic´ • Matej Klemencˇicˇ • Maurizio Lorber • Enrico Lucchese • Roberto Pancheri • Alessio Pasian • Rivista di Storia dell’arte fondata nel 1975 Jan-Christoph Rössler • Ferdinand Sˇerbelj • Valerio Terraroli • Andrea Tomezzoli • Denis Ton • Giovanni Carlo Federico Villa • Maria Walcher • Nicoletta Zanni 32(2013) I testi sono sottoposti all’esame del Comitato Scientifico e del Comitato dei Revisori Anonimi Distribuzione libraria Scripta edizioni [email protected] ISSN 1827-269X scripta edizioni Pubblicato con il contributo di Presentazione PRIN 2010-11 UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI TRIESTE FRA 2011 Il numero 32 di AFAT relativo al 2013 si pre- E siamo all’età neoclassica, con un im- senta con l’abituale puntualità e nella sua portante inedito di Giambattista Lampi e veste rinnovata. Ogni volta – e non ci si un’indagine su un singolare aspetto di pro- stanca di dirlo – è come un piccolo miraco- duzione artistica, il papier peint, nella rara lo riuscire a giungere alla meta in tempi così produzione legata a eventi contemporanei: magri di risorse, in un Ateneo, come quello nel nostro caso, episodi della campagna triestino, che ha punti straordinari di ec- dell’Armée d’Italie in quattro scene tuttora cellenza ma che non ha mai ‘investito’ sulla prospettate sulle pareti di un ambiente di vil- storia dell’arte. Tant’è; non è mai mancata, la Gradenigo a Carbonera, presso Treviso. -
WRITING ABOUT EARLY RENAISSANCE WORKS of ART in VENICE and FLORENCE (1550-1800) Laura-Maria
BETWEEN TASTE AND HISTORIOGRAPHY: WRITING ABOUT EARLY RENAISSANCE WORKS OF ART IN VENICE AND FLORENCE (1550-1800) Laura-Maria Popoviciu A dissertation submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Combined Historical Studies The Warburg Institute University of London 2014 1 I declare that the work presented in this thesis is my own _______________________________ Laura-Maria Popoviciu 2 ABSTRACT My dissertation is an investigation of how early Renaissance paintings from Venice and Florence were discussed and appraised by authors and collectors writing in these cities between 1550 and 1800. The variety of source material I have consulted has enabled me to assess and to compare the different paths pursued by Venetian and Florentine writers, the type of question they addressed in their analyses of early works of art and, most importantly, their approaches to the re-evaluation of the art of the past. Among the types of writing on art I explore are guidebooks, biographies of artists, didactic poems, artistic dialogues, dictionaries and letters, paying particular attention in these different genres to passages about artists from Guariento to Giorgione in Venice and from Cimabue to Raphael in Florence. By focusing, within this framework, on primary sources and documents, as well as on the influence of art historical literature on the activity of collecting illustrated by the cases of the Venetian Giovanni Maria Sasso and the Florentine Francesco Maria Niccolò Gabburri, I show that two principal approaches to writing about the past emerged during this period: the first, adopted by many Venetian authors, involved the aesthetic evaluation of early Renaissance works of art, often in comparison to later developments; the second, more frequent among Florentine writers, tended to document these works and place them in their historical context, without necessarily making artistic judgements about them. -
Dp Canaletto Anglais
PRESS RELEASE sous le haut patronage de la Ville de Venise CANALETTO À VENISE C’EST AU MUSÉE MAILLOL 19 SEPTEMBRE 2012 > 10 FÉVRIER 2013 billets coupe–file www.museemaillol.com m c 1 9 x 5 , 6 4 - e l i o t r u s e l i u H – 0 3 7 1 - 5 2 7 1 – ) l i a t é d ( o r a n r o C s i a l a P r e u d d i e s n e h u c v S e . n H a u – o r D e k a l l o t V e e © t u o l t a o S h P a l – e n d i l r e e u B q i l i u s z a n B e a e s L u – M o t e t h e l c i a l t n a a a C t t S i d e i l r a e l n a a g C e d o l i ä n o m t e n A G OUVERT TOUS LES JOURS DE 10H30 À 19H — NOCTURNE LE VENDREDI JUSQU’À 21H30 61, RUE DE GRENELLE 75007 PARIS — MÉTRO RUE DU BAC CONTENTS 1- PRESS RELEASE 3 2- COMMISSION AND SCIENTIFIC COMITTEE 5 3- EXTRACTS FROM THE CATALOGUE 6 4- NON-EXHAUSTIVE LIST OF WORKS 13 5- VISUAL DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR THE MEDIA 19 6- PRACTICAL INFORMATION 22 PRESS CONTACTS MUSÉE MAILLOL AGENCE OBSERVATOIRE 59-61 rue de Grenelle 68 rue Pernety 75007 Paris 75014 Paris Claude Unger Céline Echinard 06 14 71 27 02 01 43 54 87 71 [email protected] [email protected] Elisabeth Apprédérisse www.observatoire.fr 01 42 22 57 25 [email protected] 2 1- PRESS RELEASE Under the patronage of The City of Venice MUSÉE MAILLOL CANALETTO IN VENICE 19 September 2012 -10 February 2013 The Musée Maillol pays homage to Venice with the first exhibition devoted exclusively to Canaletto’s Venetian works. -
COPERTINA SUPPLEMENTI 08.Ai
I Nuove letture e prospettive di ricerca per il Settecento europeo LEMENT PP U 08 S IL CAPITALE CULTURALE Studies on the Value of Cultural Heritage JOURNAL OF THE SECTION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE Department of Education, Cultural Heritage and Tourism University of Macerata eum IL CAPITALE CULTURALE Studies on the Value of Cultural Heritage Supplementi 08 / 2018 eum Il Capitale culturale Donato, Rolando Dondarini, Andrea Emiliani, Studies on the Value of Cultural Heritage Gaetano Maria Golinelli, Xavier Greffe, Alberto Supplementi 08, 2018 Grohmann, Susan Hazan, Joel Heuillon, Emanuele Invernizzi, Lutz Klinkhammer, ISSN 2039-2362 (online) Federico Marazzi, Fabio Mariano, Aldo M. ISBN 978-88-6056-586-0 Morace, Raffaella Morselli, Olena Motuzenko, Giuliano Pinto, Marco Pizzo, Edouard Direttore / Editor Pommier, Carlo Pongetti, Adriano Prosperi, Massimo Montella Angelo R. Pupino, Bernardino Quattrociocchi, Margherita Rasulo, Mauro Co-Direttori / Co-Editors Renna, Orietta Rossi Pinelli, Roberto Tommy D. Andersson, Elio Borgonovi, Sani, Girolamo Sciullo, Mislav Simunic, Rosanna Cioffi, Stefano Della Torre, Michela Simonetta Stopponi, Michele Tamma, Frank di Macco, Daniele Manacorda, Serge Noiret, Vermeulen, Stefano Vitali Tonino Pencarelli, Angelo R. Pupino, Girolamo Sciullo Web http://riviste.unimc.it/index.php/cap-cult Coordinatore editoriale / Editorial Coordinator e-mail Francesca Coltrinari [email protected] Coordinatore tecnico / Managing Coordinator Editore / Publisher Pierluigi Feliciati eum edizioni università di macerata, Centro direzionale, -
Paolo Veroneses Art of Business
Paolo Veronese’s Art of Business: Painting, Investment, and the Studio as Social Nexus Author(s): John Garton Reviewed work(s): Source: Renaissance Quarterly, Vol. 65, No. 3 (Fall 2012), pp. 753-808 Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of the Renaissance Society of America Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/668301 . Accessed: 02/10/2012 14:40 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press and Renaissance Society of America are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Renaissance Quarterly. http://www.jstor.org Paolo Veronese’s Art of Business: Painting, Investment, and the Studio as Social Nexus* by J OHN G ARTON Despite the prominent career of Paolo (Caliari) Veronese (1528 –88), much remains to be discovered about his patrons and peers. Several letters written by the artist are presented here for the first time, and their recipient is identified as the humanist Marcantonio Gandino. The letters reference artworks, visitors to Veronese’s studio, and economic data pertaining to the painter. Analyzing the correspondence from a variety of methodological viewpoints reveals how Veronese fulfilled commissions, interacted with nobility, and invested his painterly profits in land on the Venetian terraferma.