BULGARIA Council of Ministers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

BULGARIA Council of Ministers REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA Council of Ministers National Biodiversity Conservation Plan Sofia, June 1999 CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 CURRENT STATUS OF BIODIVERSITY IN BULGARIA.......................................................... 2 1. LEGAL BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION FRAMEWORK IN BULGARIA ................................................................ 2 A. HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM OF NATIONAL LEGAL NORMS .............................................................................. 2 B. INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS (C ONVENTIONS ) ........................................................................................ 3 C. HARMONISATION WITH THE EUROPEAN LEGISLATION FOR NATURE PROTECTION ...................................... 3 2. INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN BULGARIA . PARTNERS ......................... 4 3. PROTECTED NATURE AREAS .......................................................................................................................... 7 4. BULGARIA 'S BIODIVERSITY ............................................................................................................................. 8 5. THREATS TO BIODIVERSITY ............................................................................................................................. 9 6. IMPACT OF THE MAIN SOCIO -ECONOMIC SECTORS IN THE COUNTRY ON BIODIVERSITY ............................... 11 CHAPTER 2 OBJECTIVES AND PRIORITIES IN SELECTION OF SITES OF THE NBCP...................... 14 1. OBJECTIVES AND MAIN MEASURES TO ACHIEVE THE OBJECTIVES ................................................................ 14 2. PRIORITIES IN SELECTION OF SITES FOR CONSERVATION AND MAINTENANCE OF BIODIVERSITY .................. 16 3. CRITERIA FOR SELECTION AND PRIORITY SITES IN THE CONSERVATION AND MAINTENANCE OF KEY ECO -SYSTEMS ............................................................................................................................................... 117 4. CRITERIA FOR SELECTION AND PRIORITY SITES FOR CONSERVATION OF PLANT AND ANIMAL SPECIES ................................................................................................................................................................. 118 5. CRITERIA FOR THE SELECTION AND PRIORITY SITES FOR PROTECTION OF HABITATS ................................. 118 6. CRITERIA FOR SELECTION AND PRIORITIES FOR CONSERVATION OF GENETIC RESOURCES ......................... 119 CHAPTER 3 NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION PLAN ACTIVITIES ................................... 20 CHAPTER 4 FUNDING THE NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION PLAN............................... 34 CHAPTER 5 ORGANISATION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NBCP........................................... 38 CHAPTER 6 MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NBCP ............................................................................................................................................................. 40 1. INDICATORS FOR SUSTAINABLE USE OF THE BIOLIGICAL RESOURCES ......................................................... 110 END NOTE ............................................................................................................................................................. 43 ANNEXES ............................................................................................................................................................. 43 i List of Abbreviations Used in the National Biodiversity Conservation Plan AA Academy of Agriculture BAS Bulgarian Academy of Sciences BHFU Bulgarian Hunters and Fishermen Union BSBCP Bulgarian-Swiss Programme for Biodiversity Conservation BSBCP-forest Bulgarian-Swiss Programme for Biodiversity Conservation at the National Forestry Department BSPB Bulgarian Society for the Protection of Birds CE Committee of Energy CM Council of Ministers CP Civil Protection EU European Union FAO Food and Agricultural Organisation FU Forestry University GEF Biodiversity Conservation Project financed by the Global Environmental Facil- ity HEF Higher Education Facility IB Institute of Botany IF Institute of Forestry IHE Inspectorate of Hygiene and Epidemiology IUCN International Union for the Conservation of Nature MAFAR Ministry of Agriculture, Forests and Agrarian Reform MD Ministry of Defence MES Ministry of Education and Science MF Ministry of Finance MFA Ministry of Foreign Affairs MH Ministry of Healthcare MInd Ministry of Industry MInt Ministry of the Interior MLSP Ministry of Labour and Social Policy MOEW Ministry of Environment and Waters MRDPW Ministry of Regional Development and Public Works MT Ministry of Transport 1 MTT Ministry of Trade and Tourism NDF National Department of Forests NEPF National Environment Protection Fund NF National Fund NGO Non-Governmental Organisation NNPS National Nature Protection Service NPPQAS National Plant Protection, Quarantine and Agrochemistry Service NSS National Soil Service PHARE Programme of the EU RIEW Regional Inspectorate of Environment and Waters SAPARD Special Accession Programme for Agriculture and Rural Development SIR State Inspectorate of Fishing UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNEP United Nations Environment Programme UNESCO United Nations Education, Science and Culture Organisation WWF World Wide Fund for nature 2 INTRODUCTION Biodiversity is a pre-requisite for the sustained existence of mankind and is of essential importance for the continued survival of present and future generations. In light of the extent of threats to ecosys- tems and species, the governments of the world came to an agreement in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 to work together to conserve biodiversity and promote the sustainable use of biological resources. Bulgaria is one of Europe's most biodiversity rich countries. Despite the considerable difficulties and challenges in the current transition to a market economy, concern for biodiversity conservation re- mains strong within the country. This is confirmed both by the national legislation and by Bul- garia's accession to international acts and initiatives in this field. In 1998 the Bulgarian Government approved the National Biological Diversity Conservation Strat- egy, which was inspired by the Pan European Strategy for Biological and Landscape Diversity. The development of the National Biodiversity Conservation Plan (NBCP) is a direct follow up to the National Strategy and it outlines specific priority activities. The identified activities are largely achievable within existing institutional, financial and personnel resources and determine the follow- ing key areas: •Priority measures for biodiversity conservation and maintenance; •Specific activities within the priority measures; •Financial resources required for the implementation of priority activities and identified domestic and external sources of funding; •Implementation co-ordination mechanisms. An ecosystem approach was applied in the drafting of the NBCP. Even where specific abiotic and biotic components are of conservation importance and might be the object of special con- servation actions, these were considered in a holistic ecosystem framework. The following ecosystems were given specific attention in the NBCP: •Marine ecosystems; •Coastal ecosystems; •Wetlands along the Black Sea coastline; •The Danube and wetlands along the Danube; •Internal water and wetland ecosystems; •Forest ecosystems; •Mountain (pasture) ecosystems; •Agroecosystems; •Low-land (grass) ecosystems. In addition to the biodiversity conservation activities identified for the above ecosystems, the NBCP includes activities that are generic to all. Such as the establishment of a national eco- network, the conservation and maintenance of endangered plants and animals, and the con- servation of genetic resources. However, care has been taken not to include activities al- ready encompassed in planed or ongoing environmental management plans and pro- grammes. The National Biodiversity Conservation Plan was developed by representatives of scientific and academic institutions, domestic and international NGOs as well as the con- cerned governmental ministries and departments. The characteristics of the country's main ecosystems were described; the threats to the biodiversity identified and specific mainte- nance and conservation actions were proposed. This part of the NBCP development relied extensively on a series of workshops to ensure peoples participation in the process. Representatives of government institutions analysed the reports and the workshop outcomes and structured the Plan activities by importance and feasibility. Special attention was given to the financial resources of the institutions entrusted with carrying out of these activities. Rep- resentatives from the Ministry of Environment and Water (MOEW), international consult- ants, members of the Plan Editing Group and of the NBCP Steering Committee collaborated in the finalisation of the Plan. The successful implementation of the Plan will depend up broad participation of all sectors, and the securing of adequate financial resources. 1 CHAPTER 1 CURRENT STATUS OF BIODIVERSITY IN BULGARIA 1. Legal Biodiversity Conservation Framework in Bulgaria A. Hierarchical System of National Legal Norms The concept of environmental protection is firmly established in Article 15 of the Constitu- tion, which states “The Republic of Bulgaria shall ensure the protection and reproduction of the environment, the maintenance and diversity of living Nature, and the sustainable use of the country's natural
Recommended publications
  • Assessing Landscape Effects on Genetics and Dispersal of the Rocky Mountain Apollo Butterfly Arnassiusp Smintheus Using a Resistance Mapping Approach
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 10-27-2017 10:30 AM Assessing Landscape Effects on Genetics and Dispersal of the Rocky Mountain Apollo Butterfly arnassiusP smintheus using a Resistance Mapping Approach Ning Chen The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Dr. Nusha Keyghobadi The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Biology A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Master of Science © Ning Chen 2017 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Chen, Ning, "Assessing Landscape Effects on Genetics and Dispersal of the Rocky Mountain Apollo Butterfly Parnassius smintheus using a Resistance Mapping Approach" (2017). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 5058. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/5058 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract Landscape variables that best explain genetic differentiation may not also best explain dispersal patterns, but many studies use genetic differentiation as a proxy for dispersal. I tested the effects of landscape on both genetic differentiation and dispersal in parallel, to explore whether landscape effects on genetic differentiation between populations and landscape effects on dispersal would be comparable in such contexts. I used circuit theory (Circuitscape) and least cost transect analysis to evaluate the effects of landscape on both movement and genetic differentiation of the butterfly, Parnassius smintheus, in the Jumpingpound Ridge study system.
    [Show full text]
  • Time Evolution of a Rifted Continental Arc: Integrated ID-TIMS and LA-ICPMS Study of Magmatic Zircons from the Eastern Srednogorie, Bulgaria
    LITHOS-02763; No of Pages 15 Lithos xxx (2012) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Lithos journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/lithos Time evolution of a rifted continental arc: Integrated ID-TIMS and LA-ICPMS study of magmatic zircons from the Eastern Srednogorie, Bulgaria S. Georgiev a,⁎, A. von Quadt a, C.A. Heinrich a,b, I. Peytcheva a,c, P. Marchev c a Institute of Geochemistry and Petrology, ETH Zurich, Clausiusstrasse 25, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland b Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Zurich, Switzerland c Geological Institute, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Acad. G. Bonchev St., 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria article info abstract Article history: Eastern Srednogorie in Bulgaria is the widest segment of an extensive magmatic arc that formed by conver- Received 24 December 2011 gence of Africa and Europe during Mesozoic to Tertiary times. Northward subduction of the Tethys Ocean Accepted 10 June 2012 beneath Europe in the Late Cretaceous gave rise to a broad range of basaltic to more evolved magmas with locally Available online xxxx associated Cu–Au mineralization along this arc. We used U–Pb geochronology of single zircons to constrain the temporal evolution of the Upper Cretaceous magmatism and the age of basement rocks through which the Keywords: magmas were emplaced in this arc segment. High precision isotope dilution-thermal ionization mass spectrometry U–Pb zircon ages – ID-TIMS (ID-TIMS) was combined with laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA ICPMS) for LA‐ICPMS spatial resolution within single zircon grains. Eastern Srednogorie arc Three tectono-magmatic regions are distinguished from north to south within Eastern Srednogorie: East Balkan, Geodynamic evolution Yambol–Burgas and Strandzha.
    [Show full text]
  • New Data on the Stratigraphy of the Tethyan Triassic in the Strandzha Mts., SE Bulgaria
    GEOWGICA BALCANICA, 25. S-6, Sofia, Decemb. 1995, p. 33-42 New data on the stratigraphy of the Tethyan Triassic in the Strandzha Mts., SE Bulgaria Sava Savov, Christo Dabovski, Kiril Budurov Geological Institute, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 11JJ Sofw (submined 20.11.1995; accepted for publication 27.11.1995) C. CatiOfl, X. ,[Ja6otlc1Cu, K. Iiydypoe -HoeNe c>aHH&Ie o cmpamuzpatjjuu Temucc1eozo mpuaca­ CmpaHc>xaHciCue zpp~>~ (IOzo-Bocmo'IHu IiruzapUR). )J,aHHble aaropoa H ony6nHJ:oaaHHU HHcllop­ MaUHll JliUOT OCHoilaHHe JlJlll HOBOro aH8JJH3a CTpaTHfPa41HH TpHaCCOBbiX DOpO.Il B CTpaH.QaaHCJ:HX ropax. TpHaC OTHeceH J:aTeropH'IeCJ:H J: TCTHCCJ:OMY THny. 3oH8JlbHOC CTpaTHci»HUHpOBI\HHe TpHaca DO J:OHO.IlOHTHOii 4layHe H peJ:OHCTpYJ:UHll TpHaCOBOro pa3pe3a, C.QenaJJH ero CODOCTaBHI\IIbll\11 C .Qpy­ J"HMH pa3pC3aMH Ha TeppHTOpHH lionrapHH. MHoro'tacneHHble nHTOCTpaTHrpa41H'feCJ:He e.QHHHUbl, Bbi.QeneHHble Ha OCHOBaHHH p&lHOCTeneHHOii MeTaMOpci»H'feCJ:Oil H TCJ:TOHH'feCJ:Oii o6pa6oTJ:H 00- po.Q, o61.e.QHHeHbl B 'ICTblpe CBHTbl. CTpbiBHHUCJ:U CBHTa cnaraeT HH3bl pa3pC3a. 0Ha npe.QCTIUIJJeHa MCT&rpaBIIJIHTaMH H MeTancaMHTaMH C npocnoiiJ:aMH MenJ:OraJJe'IHbiX J:OHrnOMepaTOB. B cne.QyJO­ IQeii, 3a6epCKOI CBHTe, Bbi.QeneHbl .ll&a 'tneHa: rpaMaTHitOBCKHI H KaJHiiCKH.IlOnCJ:Hii. 3-fa CBHTa cno­ aeHa cllnHWeOO.QOOHO 'tepe.ll)'JOIUHMHCll aprHMHTaMH, tlliiJinHTaMH, MCTaaneaponHTaMH, MCTanca­ MHTaMH, H MpaMOpH30BaHHbii\IIH HlBCCTHliJ:aMH, a T&J:ae aynJ:aHHTaMH OCHOBHOrO COCTaBa H PYAHbi­ MH TenaMH. 3a6epCJ:all CBHTa OXBaTbiBaCT BepXHHi COaT H HH3bl 3reiiCJ:Oro DOAbllpyca (aHH3HHCJ:Hil llpyc). B cpeAHHX OTAenax pa3pC3a pacnonoaeHa KOHAOnOBCICU CBHTa, cnoaeHHU H3BeCTHliiCaMH H MpaMOpH30BaHHbiMH H3BeC"!llllltaMH.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Biking Tour
    PIRT Mountain Biking Tour PROMOTING INNOVATIVE RURAL TOURISM IN THE BLACK SEA BASIN REGION 2014 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Itinerary 2. Bulgaria-Turkey ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Additional Sites Included in the Itinerary Nr. 2 ............................................................................................................................................................ 17 Introduction For a ticket to adventure, bring your mountain bike to the Black Sea Region. The four countries around the Black Sea- Bulgaria, Turkey, Georgia and Armenia, are a paradise for mountain biking with innumerable cycle routes on gravel roads, in the mountains and along rough cart roads. Their dramatic natural landscapes offer challenging and rewarding slick rock trails, lush green single track, ruins of ancient civilizations, canyons and secret paths to explore. The mountain biking in and around Black Sea is some of the best trail riding in Europe. There are no restrictions on using bikes on the routes. Most of the routes are suitable for energetic mountain biking. Mountain biking is best between May and June or September and October. Itinerary 2- The “Black Sea Discovery”
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropogenic Threats to High-Altitude Parnassian Diversity Fabien Condamine, Felix Sperling
    Anthropogenic threats to high-altitude parnassian diversity Fabien Condamine, Felix Sperling To cite this version: Fabien Condamine, Felix Sperling. Anthropogenic threats to high-altitude parnassian diversity. News of The Lepidopterists’ Society, 2018, 60, pp.94-99. hal-02323624 HAL Id: hal-02323624 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02323624 Submitted on 23 Oct 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. _______________________________________________________________________________________News of The Lepidopterists’ Society Volume 60, Number 2 Conservation Matters: Contributions from the Conservation Committee Anthropogenic threats to high-altitude parnassian diversity Fabien L. Condamine1 and Felix A.H. Sperling2 1CNRS, UMR 5554 Institut des Sciences de l’Evolution (Université de Montpellier), Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier, France [email protected], corresponding author 2Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G 2E9, Alberta, Canada Introduction extents (Chen et al. 2011). However, this did not result in increases in range area because the area of land available Global mean annual temperatures increased by ~0.85° declines with increasing elevation. Accordingly, extinc- C between 1880 and 2012 and are likely to rise by an tion risk may increase long before species reach a summit, additional 1° C to 4° C by 2100 (Stocker et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Restoration of Forest Habitats in 10 Natura 2000 Sites in Bulgaria PDF 13.15 MB
    Project LIFE08 NAT/BG/000281 CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION OF FOREST HABITATS IN 10 NATURA 2000 SITES Conservation and Restoration of 11 Natura 2000 Riparian and Wetland Habitats in 10 SCI’s in Bulgarian Forests © Katerina Rakovska / WWF 1 PROJECT DATA PROJECT LIFE08 NAT/BG/000281 Conservation and Restoration of 11 Natura 2000 Riparian and Wetland Habitats in 10 SCI’s in Bulgarian Forests, LIFE08 NAT/BG/000281 www.wwf.bg/what_we_do/protected_areas/10parks/news CO-FUNDING: LIFE + Programme (EC financial instrument for the environment). DURATION: January 2010 - June 2014 PROJECT BUDGET: 1 236 834 €, of which 615 199 € EC co-funding PARTNERS: Executive Forestry Agency (EFA), WWF, 10 Nature Park Directorates: Bulgarka, Vitosha, Vrachanski Balkan, Zlatni Pyasatsi, Persina, Rilski Manastir, Rusenski Lom, Sinite Kamani, Strandhza, Shumensko Plato, Sofia Forest Seed-Control Station and Pazardzhik Poplar Station. 2 PROJECT GOALS The project goal was to local trees and shrubs. improve the conservation status Habitat quality improvement was of 10 Sites of Community planned through restoration of Importance (Natura 2000 sites) rare plant species characteristic managed by the Executive of the target habitats. Forestry Agency (EFA) through conservation and restoration of Bulgaria has limited experience 11 riparian and wetland habitats in management and restoration in forests. The total area of target of riverine and wetland habitats. habitats conserved or restored is The current project was an 21 000 ha. The intention was to opportunity to gain experience achieve the conservation of target and share the lessons learnt habitats through placement of through distribution of good specialised infrastructure (fences, practices for conservation and wooden grates, bridges, tourist restoration of habitats in sites spots) in order to restrict human managed by the EFA, which can impact (access of people and be used in other Natura 2000 vehicles).
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Climate Variability on Water Resources in the Bulgarian South Black Sea Basin
    Regional Hydrological Impacts of Climatic Change—Hydroclimatic Variability (Proceedings of symposium S6 held during the Seventh IAHS Scientific Assembly at Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil, 81 April 2005). IAHS Publ. 296, 2005. Influence of climate variability on water resources in the Bulgarian South Black Sea basin BERNARDO LIZAMA RIVAS1 & IVANKA KOLEVA-LIZAMA2 1 Department of Hydrology, National Institute of Meteorology and Hydrology, 66 Tsarigradsko Shosse, 1784 Sofia, Bulgaria [email protected] 2 Department of Ecology, University of Forestry, 10 Kliment Ohridski, 1796 Sofia, Bulgaria Abstract The South Black Sea basin in Bulgaria was selected as the study area. The region is of agricultural and forest importance for the country. The irrigation water demand increases in summer when most of the rivers in the region have low flows. The purpose of this research is to assess the variability of hydro-meteorological conditions in the study catchments. Long-term data (1952–2002) from some hydro-meteorological gauging stations, which are located in the study catchments, were used. In order to evaluate the influence of climatic factors on the water resources, the warm and humid conditions were analysed. Application of several statistical tests demonstrated that there are changes in runoff which are not caused by man’s activity. The features of the variations of these hydro-meteorological elements and their inherent trends are determined. The results of this study show that runoff has decreased considerably all over the study region in recent years. The significant tendency to a gradual reduction of runoff in the region is due to considerably decrease of the precipitation and increase of temperature.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory of Azov-Black Sea Coastal Wetlands
    Directory of Azov-Black Sea Coastal Wetlands Kyiv–2003 Directory of Azov-Black Sea Coastal Wetlands: Revised and updated. — Kyiv: Wetlands International, 2003. — 235 pp., 81 maps. — ISBN 90 5882 9618 Published by the Black Sea Program of Wetlands International PO Box 82, Kiev-32, 01032, Ukraine E-mail: [email protected] Editor: Gennadiy Marushevsky Editing of English text: Rosie Ounsted Lay-out: Victor Melnychuk Photos on cover: Valeriy Siokhin, Vasiliy Kostyushin The presentation of material in this report and the geographical designations employed do not imply the expres- sion of any opinion whatsoever on the part of Wetlands International concerning the legal status of any coun- try, area or territory, or concerning the delimitation of its boundaries or frontiers. The publication is supported by Wetlands International through a grant from the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries of the Netherlands and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands (MATRA Fund/Programme International Nature Management) ISBN 90 5882 9618 Copyright © 2003 Wetlands International, Kyiv, Ukraine All rights reserved CONTENTS CONTENTS3 6 7 13 14 15 16 22 22 24 26 28 30 32 35 37 40 43 45 46 54 54 56 58 58 59 61 62 64 64 66 67 68 70 71 76 80 80 82 84 85 86 86 86 89 90 90 91 91 93 Contents 3 94 99 99 100 101 103 104 106 107 109 111 113 114 119 119 126 130 132 135 139 142 148 149 152 153 155 157 157 158 160 162 164 164 165 170 170 172 173 175 177 179 180 182 184 186 188 191 193 196 198 199 201 202 4 Directory of Azov-Black Sea Coastal Wetlands 203 204 207 208 209 210 212 214 214 216 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 230 232 233 Contents 5 EDITORIAL AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Directory is based on the national reports prepared for the Wetlands International project ‘The Importance of Black Sea Coastal Wetlands in Particular for Migratory Waterbirds’, sponsored by the Netherlands Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Carabidae) of the Strandzha Mountain and Adjacent Coastal Territories (Bulgaria and Turkey)
    Biodiversity Data Journal 4: e8135 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.4.e8135 Taxonomic Papers The ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of the Strandzha Mountain and adjacent coastal territories (Bulgaria and Turkey) Rumyana Kostova‡, Borislav Guéorguiev§ ‡ Sofia University, Faculty of Biology, Sofia, Bulgaria § National Museum of Natural History Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria Corresponding author: Rumyana Kostova ([email protected]) Academic editor: Stephen Venn Received: 15 Feb 2016 | Accepted: 30 Mar 2016 | Published: 01 Apr 2016 Citation: Kostova R, Guéorguiev B (2016) The ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of the Strandzha Mountain and adjacent coastal territories (Bulgaria and Turkey). Biodiversity Data Journal 4: e8135. doi: 10.389 7/BDJ.4.e8135 Abstract Background The knowledge of the ground-beetle fauna of Strandzha is currently incomplete, and is largely based on data from the Bulgarian part of the region and on records resulting from casual collecting. This study represents a critical revision of the available literature, museum collections and a three years field study of the carabid beetles of the Bulgarian and Turkish parts of Strandzha Mountain and the adjacent Black Sea Coast territories. New information A total of 328 species and subspecies of Carabidae, belonging to 327 species from the region of Strandzha Mountain and adjacent seacoast area, have been listed. Of these, 77 taxa represent new records for the Bulgarian part of the region, and 110 taxa new records for Turkish part of the studied region. © Kostova R, Guéorguiev B. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
    [Show full text]
  • Along the Bulgarian Black Sea Coast (For Details See Corresponding Numbers in Table 1)
    All_Short_Notes:SHORT_NOTE.qxd 01.03.2019 17:02 Seite 2 220 sHOrt NOte HerPetOzOa 31 (3/4) Wien, 28. Februar 2019 sHOrt NOte skin glands contain poisons, as seen also in Xerotyphlops vermicularis (Mer- leptodactylids ( Prates et al. 2012). thus, it reM , 1820), along the Bulgarian may well be that beside the size of the prey, the death of the juvenile viper was caused Black sea coast: a compilation of by the frog’s potentially toxic secretions. new and published records the prey type and size of the snake could indicate that juvenile C. d. ruruima are the eurasian Blind snake, Xero - dietary generalists. Moreover, the authors typhlops vermicularis (MerreM , 1820), the recorded here for the first time an amphib - only representative of the snake family ian as prey of C. d . ruruima . typhlopidae (superfamily scolecophidia) in rILLItsCH rILLItsCH aCKNOWLeDGMeNts: the authors are europe ( G & G 1993), is grateful to Priscila azarak (Laboratório de evolução found in the southern parts of the Balkan e Genética animal, Universidade Federal do Peninsula ( GrILLItsCH & G rILLItsCH 1993; amazonas - LeGaL/UFaM) who identified the frog sILLerO et al. 2014). the snake represents species. an element of the turano-Mediterranean reFereNCes: CLarK , r. W. (2004): timber chorotype ( MIzseI et al. 2017), in which all rattlesnakes ( Crotalus horridus ) use chemical cues to populations in the Balkans probably origi - select ambush sites.- Journal of Chemical ecology, nate from eastern anatolian ancestors ( KOr- Ithaca, New York; 30 (3): 607-617. HOGe , a. r. (1965): Preliminary account on neotropical Crotalinae NILIOs 2017). the eurasian Blind snake (serpentes: Viperidae).- Memórias do Instituto Butan - prefers xerothermic habitats with deep, dry tan, são Paulo; 32: 109-184.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Strandzha Mountains and the Black Sea Coast
    Historia naturalis bulgarica, 21: 13-48, 2015 Terrestrial gastropods (Mollusca, Gastropoda) of Strandzha Mountain and the Black Sea coast (Bulgaria and Turkey) Atanas Irikov, Ivelin Mollov Abstract: The current synopsis presents an overview of the terrestrial malacofauna of Strandzha Mountain in Bulgaria and Turkey, based on previously published and new data. As a result of the research we recorded 101 species and subspecies of ter- restrial molluscs belonging to 27 families. The data on the terrestrial malacofauna from the Turkish part of Strandzha is entirely new and presented here for the first time. The synopsis includes a list of synonymous species and subspecies concerning the area of research, all known localities, new localities reported for 50 taxa, systematic and environmental data. For the first time a zoogeographical and conservation analysis of the terrestrial snails is made. Key words: terrestrial gastropods, snails, slugs, Strandzha Mountain, Bulgaria, Turkey. Introduction 50 publications contain data on the terrestrial Original data on species distribution, as well as malacofauna of Strandzha Mountain in Bulgaria. For taxonomic, systematic, zoogeographical and ecologi- Strandzha Mnt. in Turkey there are limited data only cal data resulting from studies in the years 2002-2010 on the presence of a few species of the genus Monacha are included. (Hausdorf, 2000). Most publications report spe- cies composition and localities or describe new taxa. Material and methods Information on the malacofauna is fragmentary and Names of species and subspecies, with a few ex- mostly referring to the Bulgarian part of Strandzha. ceptions, follow Irikov & Mollov (2006). The list of With almost no data on the Turkish part of Strandzha, synonyms applies only to Strandzha Mnt.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Protection of the Black Sea Biodiversity
    Conservation and Protection of the Black Sea Biodiversity Review of the existing and planned protected areas in the Black Sea (Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey) with a special focus on possible deficiencies regarding law enforcement and implementation of management plans EC DG Env. Project MISIS: No. 07.020400/2012/616044/SUB/D2 2012 This document has been prepared with the financial assistance of EC DG Environment. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of EC DG Environment. The opinions expressed are those of the authors. Any errors or omissions are responsibility of the authors and should be reported to them accordingly. Contact details for sending comments on the Report: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] For bibliographic purposes this document may be cited as: Begun T., Muresan M., Zaharia T., Dencheva K., Sezgin M., Bat L., Velikova V., 2012. Conservation and Protection of the Black Sea Biodiversity. Review of the existing and planned protected areas in the Black Sea (Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey) with a special focus on possible deficiencies regarding law enforcement and implementation of management plans. EC DG Env. MISIS Project Deliverables. www.misisproject.eu This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the authors, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. The authors would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this report as a source of information. 2 Table of Contents List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................... 5 List of Figures .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Acronyms and Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]