DOCSLIB.ORG

ACFN Encroachment Final Report Sep 28 12

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ACFN Encroachment Final Report Sep 28 12 A NARRATIVE OF ENCROACHMENT EXPERIENCED BY ATHABASCA CHIPEWYAN FIRST NATION PREPARED FOR: ATHABASCA CHIPEWYAN FIRST NATION INDUSTRY RELATIONS CORPORTION PREPARED BY: P.M. (Patt) Larcombe, Symbion Consultants 415-70 Arthur Street Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 0G7 SEPTEMBER 28, 2012 i TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables .............................................................................................................................v List of Figures .............................................................................................................................v List of Acronyms .................................................................................................................... viii Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. ix 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Qualifications of Writer .......................................................................................... 1-2 1.2 Objectives ............................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Methods .................................................................................................................. 1-3 1.4 Organization of Report ........................................................................................... 1-3 2.0 TERMINOLOGY AND FRAMEWORK ....................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Terminology ............................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1.1 ACFN Treaty Rights ...................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.2 ACFN Treaty and Traditional Lands .............................................................. 2-3 2.1.3 Terminology Use in Report ............................................................................ 2-8 2.1.3.1 ACFN Encroachment Study Area ..................................................... 2-8 2.1.3.2 ACFN Rights, Values and Knowledge ............................................ 2-10 2.1.3.3 ACFN and ACFN Members ............................................................. 2-11 2.1.3.4 Encroachment .................................................................................. 2-11 2.2 Spatial and Temporal Scope of Report ................................................................... 2-12 2.3 Conceptual Framework .......................................................................................... 2-12 3.0 HISTORIC ENCROACHMENT DRIVERS ................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Early Furtrade Era to Treaty Signing in 1899 .......................................................... 3-1 3.2 Post Treaty Era 1900-1960’s ................................................................................... 3-5 4.0 CONTEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT DRIVERS..................................................... 4-1 4.1 Population Trends in the ACFN ESA ...................................................................... 4-1 4.1.1 Recent Population Trends............................................................................. 4-2 4.1.2 Projected Population Trends ......................................................................... 4-6 4.1.3 Summary...................................................................................................... 4-8 4.2 Industrial Development ......................................................................................... 4-11 4.2.1 Hydroelectric Development ........................................................................ 4-11 4.2.1.1 W.A.C. Bennett Dam and Williston Reservoir ............................... 4-11 4.2.2.2 Potential New Hydroelectric Developments ................................... 4-15 4.2.2 Quarry and Other Mineral Exploration and Development ........................... 4-18 4.2.2.1 Quarry Development ...................................................................... 4-18 4.2.2.2 Historic Uranium Mining ................................................................ 4-22 4.2.2.3 Current Uranium Exploration ......................................................... 4-25 4.2.2.4 Other Mineral Exploration .............................................................. 4-28 ii 4.2.3 Timber Harvesting and Processing ............................................................. 4-30 4.2.4 Oil Sands Development .............................................................................. 4-35 4.2.5 Linear Features .......................................................................................... 4-44 4.2.5.1 Existing Linear Features ................................................................. 4-44 4.2.5.2 Proposed Linear Features ................................................................ 4-47 4.3 Government Resource Allocations and/or Designations ....................................... 4-51 4.3.1 Urban Development .................................................................................. 4-51 4.3.2 Recreational and Sport Use of Land and Resources ................................... 4-54 4.3.2.1 Consumptive Uses ......................................................................... 4-54 4.3.2.2 Non-Consumptive Outdoor Recreational Use................................. 4-60 4.3.3 Public Land Designations and Plans .......................................................... 4-61 4.3.4 Water Resources ........................................................................................ 4-68 4.3.4.1 Quantity ......................................................................................... 4-70 4.3.4.2 Quality........................................................................................... 4-72 4.4 Climate Change ................................................................................................... 4-74 4.5 Chronology and Spatial Pattern of Encroachment ................................................ 4-77 5.0 DIRECT EFFECTS OF ENCROACHMENT ................................................................. 5-1 5.1 Displacement .......................................................................................................... 5-2 5.1.1 Displacement from Wood Buffalo Park ........................................................ 5-2 5.1.2 Displacement from Peace-Athabasca Delta .................................................. 5-4 5.1.3 Displacement as a Consequence of Oil Sands Development ......................... 5-6 5.1.4 Displacement Due to Loss of Waterway Navigability ................................. 5-12 5.2 Avoidance or Abandonment Due to Concerns About Resource Quality ............... 5-15 5.2.1 Animals and Plants ..................................................................................... 5-15 5.2.2 Fish ............................................................................................................ 5-16 5.2.3 Water ......................................................................................................... 5-19 5.3 Avoidance or Abandonment Due to Activity, Interference and Competition ......................................................................................................... 5-22 5.3.1 Competition by Sport and Commercial Users ............................................. 5-22 5.3.2 Interference, Noise and Activity ................................................................. 5-24 5.4 Summary .............................................................................................................. 5-27 6.0 IMPACTS ON RIGHTS, VALUES AND KNOWLEDGE ............................................ 6-1 6.1 Framework ............................................................................................................ 6-2 6.2 Economic Impacts ................................................................................................ 6-7 6.2.1 Decline in Harvest Success and Opportunity ............................................... 6-7 6.2.2 Increased Costs .......................................................................................... 6-10 6.3 Socio-Cultural Impacts .......................................................................................... 6-12 6.3.1 Cultural Importance of Country Food Consumption ................................... 6-12 6.3.2 Loss of Knowledge and Skills and Intergenerational Transmission ............. 6-13 6.3.2 Loss of Continuity and Connection to Place ............................................... 6-17 iii 6.3.4 Changes in Sharing Norms ......................................................................... 6-18 6.4 Physical and Pyschological Health Impacts ........................................................... 6-20 6.4.1 Dietary Nutrition ........................................................................................ 6-20 6.4.2 Psychological Stress ................................................................................... 6-20 7.0 CONCLUSIONS .......................................................................................................... 7-1 8.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................. 8-1 ATTACHMENT A: P.M. (Patt) Larcombe Curriculum Vitae iv LIST OF TABLES TABLE 4-1: Inventory of Pipeline Project
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Volume 2: Baseline, Section 13: Traditional Land Use September 2011 Volume 2: Baseline Studies Frontier Project Section 13: Traditional Land Use
    R1 R24 R23 R22 R21 R20 T113 R19 R18 R17 R16 Devil's Gate 220 R15 R14 R13 R12 R11 R10 R9 R8 R7 R6 R5 R4 R3 R2 R1 ! T112 Fort Chipewyan Allison Bay 219 T111 Dog Head 218 T110 Lake Claire ³ Chipewyan 201A T109 Chipewyan 201B T108 Old Fort 217 Chipewyan 201 T107 Maybelle River T106 Wildland Provincial Wood Buffalo National Park Park Alberta T105 Richardson River Dunes Wildland Athabasca Dunes Saskatchewan Provincial Park Ecological Reserve T104 Chipewyan 201F T103 Chipewyan 201G T102 T101 2888 T100 Marguerite River Wildland Provincial Park T99 1661 850 Birch Mountains T98 Wildland Provincial Namur River Park 174A 33 2215 T97 94 2137 1716 T96 1060 Fort McKay 174C Namur Lake 174B 2457 239 1714 T95 21 400 965 2172 T94 ! Fort McKay 174D 1027 Fort McKay Marguerite River 2006 Wildland Provincial 879 T93 771 Park 772 2718 2926 2214 2925 T92 587 2297 2894 T91 T90 274 Whitemud Falls T89 65 !Fort McMurray Wildland Provincial Park T88 Clearwater 175 Clearwater River T87Traditional Land Provincial Park Fort McKay First Nation Gregoire Lake Provincial Park T86 Registered Fur Grand Rapids Anzac Management Area (RFMA) Wildland Provincial ! Gipsy Lake Wildland Park Provincial Park T85 Traditional Land Use Regional Study Area Gregoire Lake 176, T84 176A & 176B Traditional Land Use Local Study Area T83 ST63 ! Municipality T82 Highway Stony Mountain Township Wildland Provincial T81 Park Watercourse T80 Waterbody Cowper Lake 194A I.R. Janvier 194 T79 Wabasca 166 Provincial Park T78 National Park 0 15 30 45 T77 KILOMETRES 1:1,500,000 UTM Zone 12 NAD 83 T76 Date: 20110815 Author: CES Checked: DC File ID: 123510543-097 (Original page size: 8.5X11) Acknowledgements: Base data: AltaLIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 7: JRP SIR 69A Cultural Effects Review
    October 2013 SHELL CANADA ENERGY Appendix 7: JRP SIR 69a Cultural Effects Review Submitted to: Shell Canada Energy Project Number: 13-1346-0001 REPORT APPENDIX 7: JRP SIR 69a CULTURAL EFFECTS REVIEW Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Report Structure .................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.3 Overview of Findings ........................................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Shell’s Approach to Community Engagement ..................................................................................................... 6 1.5 Shell’s Support for Cultural Initiatives .................................................................................................................. 7 1.6 Key Terms ........................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.6.1 Traditional Knowledge .................................................................................................................................... 9 1.6.2 Traditional
    [Show full text]
  • Northwest Territories Territoires Du Nord-Ouest British Columbia
    122° 121° 120° 119° 118° 117° 116° 115° 114° 113° 112° 111° 110° 109° n a Northwest Territories i d i Cr r eighton L. T e 126 erritoires du Nord-Oues Th t M urston L. h t n r a i u d o i Bea F tty L. r Hi l l s e on n 60° M 12 6 a r Bistcho Lake e i 12 h Thabach 4 d a Tsu Tue 196G t m a i 126 x r K'I Tue 196D i C Nare 196A e S )*+,-35 125 Charles M s Andre 123 e w Lake 225 e k Jack h Li Deze 196C f k is a Lake h Point 214 t 125 L a f r i L d e s v F Thebathi 196 n i 1 e B 24 l istcho R a l r 2 y e a a Tthe Jere Gh L Lake 2 2 aili 196B h 13 H . 124 1 C Tsu K'Adhe L s t Snake L. t Tue 196F o St.Agnes L. P 1 121 2 Tultue Lake Hokedhe Tue 196E 3 Conibear L. Collin Cornwall L 0 ll Lake 223 2 Lake 224 a 122 1 w n r o C 119 Robertson L. Colin Lake 121 59° 120 30th Mountains r Bas Caribou e e L 118 v ine i 120 R e v Burstall L. a 119 l Mer S 117 ryweather L. 119 Wood A 118 Buffalo Na Wylie L. m tional b e 116 Up P 118 r per Hay R ark of R iver 212 Canada iv e r Meander 117 5 River Amber Rive 1 Peace r 211 1 Point 222 117 M Wentzel L.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges and Benefits of Approaches Used to Integrate Regional Monitoring Programs
    POLICY AND PRACTICE REVIEWS published: 07 July 2021 doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2021.666698 Challenges and Benefits of Approaches Used to Integrate Regional Monitoring Programs T. J. Arciszewski 1*, D. R. Roberts 1, K. R. Munkittrick 2 and G. J. Scrimgeour 3 1Resource Stewardship Division, Alberta Environment and Parks, Calgary, AB, Canada, 2Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, 3Office of the Chief Scientist, Alberta Environment and Parks, Edmonton, AB, Canada Although challenging to develop and operate, some degree of integrated monitoring is often necessary, especially at regional scales, to address the complex questions of environmental management and regulation. The concept of integration is well- understood, but its practice across programs and studies can be diverse suggesting a broader examination of the existing general approaches is needed. From the literature, we suggest integration of monitoring can occur across three study components: interpretation, analysis, and design. Design can be further subdivided into partial and full integration. Respectively combining information, data, and designs, we further define these types of integration and describe their general benefits and challenges, such as Edited by: Juergen Pilz, strength of inference. We further use the Oil Sands Monitoring program in northern Alberta University of Klagenfurt, Austria as an example to clarify the practices common among integrated monitoring programs. Reviewed by: The goal of the discussion paper is to familiarize readers with the diverse practices of Costica Nitu, fi Politehnica University of Bucharest, integrated monitoring to further clarify the various con gurations used to achieve the wider Romania goals of a program. Paul Makar, Environment and Climate Change Keywords: environmental monitoring, integrated monitoring, oil sands, regional monitoring program, environmental Canada, Canada managemenent *Correspondence: T.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Agenda for January 13, 2014
    TOWN OF BANFF ORDER OF BUSINESS Regular Council Meeting Town of Banff Council Chambers Monday, January 13, 2014 at 2:00 p.m. 1.0 CALL TO ORDER 2.0 APPROVAL OF AGENDA 2.1 Regular Meeting Agenda Recommendation: That council approve the agenda for the January 13, 2014 regular meeting of council. 3.0 ADOPTION OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL MINUTES 3.1 Minutes of the December 19, 2013 Regular Meeting of Council Recommendation: That council adopt the minutes of the December 19, 2013 regular meeting of council. 3.2 Minutes of the December 23, 2013 Special Meeting of Council Recommendation: That council adopt the minutes of the December 23, 2013 special meeting of council. 4.0 DELEGATIONS 4.1 Bob Ellard – Alberta Winter Games 5.0 PUBLIC INPUT ON AGENDA ITEMS 6.0 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 7.0 BYLAWS AND STAFF REPORTS 7.1 Request for Decision: Proposed Rickshaw Tour Service – 211 Bear Street Recommendation: That council consider the appropriateness of rickshaws and pedicabs for hire on Town of Banff streets and trails and provide one of the following directions to administration: a. Direct administration to give further consideration the proposed rickshaw tour service at 211 Bear Street after returning to council with a draft of the required bylaw amendments that would allow for such services; b. Direct administration to work with the proponent to make changes to current proposal for a rickshaw tour service at 211 Bear Street that would allow for the service under the current bylaws; c. Direct administration to refuse the proposed rickshaw tour service at 211 Bear Street as a result of non-conformance with the provisions of the Town of Banff Traffic Bylaw.
    [Show full text]
  • Provide Information on Department
    Written Responses from the Ministry of Environment and Parks Standing Committee on Public Accounts (Oct. 22, 2019) Topic: Provide information on department estimates on what Alberta’s emissions would have been without climate leadership action that had been implemented in the past four years? (Reference Transcript PA-83, Mr. Schmidt) • This information is available in the Climate Leadership Plan 2017-18 Progress Report available on the Open Data Portal at https://open.alberta.ca/publications/climate- leadership-plan-progress-report-2017-18 • Specifically, this information can be located in the “Ultimate Outcomes: Reduced GHG Emissions section” on page 17 of the report, excerpted below: o The Climate Leadership Plan (CLP) reference case (Table 1) represents current expectations for future GHG emissions based on 2018 federal and CLP climate policies, and on economic growth as projected in 2018. Emissions are forecast to decrease through 2018, then remain at about the same level even with increasing population, economic growth and oil sands production. Table 1 include Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC)’s 2015 historical forecast (before the CLP) that is referenced in the Climate Change Advisory Panel’s Report to Government. The historical forecast is adjusted for ECCC data updates in 2018. Differences between the historical forecast and the CLP reference case include CLP’s projected GHG reductions, differences in economic growth and methodologies used to project emissions. The CLP reference case with potential reductions from innovation
    [Show full text]
  • Section 18.0 – Socio-Economic Impact Assessment Table of Contents
    Suncor Energy Inc. Lewis In Situ Project Volume 2 – Environmental Impact Assessment February 2018 SECTION 18.0 – SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 18.0 SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT ...........................................................18 -1 18.1 Introduction .....................................................................................................18 -1 18.2 Study Area ......................................................................................................18 -1 18.2.1 Temporal Boundary ..........................................................................18 -1 18.2.2 Spatial Boundary ..............................................................................18 -1 18.3 Assessment Approach ....................................................................................18 -3 18.3.1 Regulatory Framework .....................................................................18 -3 18.3.2 Socio-economic Issues Identification ................................................18 -3 18.3.3 Valued Socio-Economic Components and Key Indicators ................ 18-3 18.3.4 Assessment Cases ...........................................................................18 -4 18.3.5 Assessment Criteria .........................................................................18 -5 18.3.6 Constraints Planning ........................................................................18 -6 18.4 Methods ..........................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Enter Filename
    MOOSA CROSSOVER PROJECT ESA 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC SETTING This section of the ESA presents a summary description of the existing biophysical and socio-economic environment potentially affected by the Project. Results of field surveys conducted in 2012 and winter 2013 have been included in this ESA report. Vegetation and wildlife reconnaissance surveys were conducted in September 2012, and additional wildlife surveys were conducted in October 2012 and March 2013. Aquatic surveys were conducted in October 2012, and winter fisheries surveys were conducted in February 2013. Methods used to determine baseline conditions for each environmental or socio-economic resource are described in the relevant subsection. The Project is located in northeast Alberta, approximately 35 km northwest of Fort McMurray. The Project footprint is located within the Northern Alberta Lowlands Physiographic Region, and crosses Crown land in the Green Area of Alberta, including two watercourses. 5.1 Study Areas The spatial boundaries or study areas considered in the description of environmental setting and assessment of potential Project effects on the environmental components include one or more of the following: Project footprint, LSA, RSA, and socio-economic study area. These study areas were used to capture the potential direct and indirect effects of the Project on each VC and their associated KI, as well as to understand the context within which the effects can occur. The LSAs and RSAs used in the effects assessment vary by environmental and socio-economic element. The LSAs were established to assess the potential, largely direct effects of the Project on the local environment. Each VC and baseline setting component is considered in defining the LSAs.
    [Show full text]
  • Zone a – Prescribed Northern Zones / Zones Nordiques Visées Par Règlement Place Names Followed by Numbers Are Indian Reserves
    Northern Residents Deductions – Places in Prescribed Zones / Déductions pour les habitants de régions éloignées – Endroits situés dans les zones visées par règlement Zone A – Prescribed northern zones / Zones nordiques visées par règlement Place names followed by numbers are Indian reserves. If you live in a place that is not listed in this publication and you think it is in a prescribed zone, contact us. / Les noms suivis de chiffres sont des réserves indiennes. Communiquez avec nous si l’endroit où vous habitez ne figure pas dans cette publication et que vous croyez qu’il se situe dans une zone visée par règlement. Yukon, Nunavut, and the Northwest Territories / Yukon, Nunavut et Territoires du Nord-Ouest All places in the Yukon, Nunavut, and the Northwest Territories are located in a prescribed northern zone. / Tous les endroits situés dans le Yukon, le Nunavut et les Territoires du Nord-Ouest se trouvent dans des zones nordiques visées par règlement. British Columbia / Colombie-Britannique Andy Bailey Recreation Good Hope Lake Nelson Forks Tahltan Liard River 3 Area Gutah New Polaris Mine Taku McDames Creek 2 Atlin Hyland Post Niteal Taku River McDonald Lake 1 Atlin Park Hyland Ranch Old Fort Nelson Tamarack Mosquito Creek 5 Atlin Recreation Area Hyland River Park Pavey Tarahne Park Muddy River 1 Bear Camp Iskut Pennington Telegraph Creek One Mile Point 1 Ben-My-Chree Jacksons Pleasant Camp Tetsa River Park Prophet River 4 Bennett Kahntah Porter Landing Toad River Salmon Creek 3 Boulder City Kledo Creek Park Prophet River Trutch Silver
    [Show full text]
  • Area Resource List
    Area Resource List Here is a list of resources for different Areas in Alberta Council. This is not an exhaustive list but is meant to give you an idea of what is available in different Areas within Alberta Council. Aurora Adventures • Hay River - bowling, pool, skating, library • Yellowknife - bowling, museum (on the weekends), glass workshop (Stencil and sandblast glasses), pool, skating, curling, silk scarf making, radio station tours, library • Yukon - Lumel Studios (glass blowing), museums, pool, skating, experimental farm, fish ladder, library • Inuvik - pool, community garden, library Chinook Area • Lethbridge o Escape rooms: Escape from LA, the Great Escape, Underground Escape o Museums and Interpretive: Galt Museum and Archives, Fort Whoop Up, Lethbridge Military Museum, Helen Schuler Nature Center, Nikka Yuko Japanese Garden, Southern Alberta Art Gallery o Activities: Corn Maze (north of Park Lake, seasonal (end of July – end of October)), Galaxy Bowling (10 pin), Holiday Bowl (5 pin), Evergreen Golf Centre (mini-golf outdoor + go-karts), Puttz Mini-golf (indoor at the Movie Mill), Elizabeth Hall Wetlands, Wear’m’out indoor playground and cafe o Swimming Pools: ATB Centre (West Lethbridge), Henderson Pool (Outdoor, seasonal), Nicholas Sheran Leisure Centre (also with seasonal spray park), Stan Siwik Family Pool, Westminster Outdoor Public Pool (seasonal), Mariner’s Cove Water Park and Wave Pool (Holiday Inn, Lethbridge) o Skating: Nicholas Sheran Leisure Centre, ATB Centre, Enmax Centre, Labor Club Ice Centre, Logan Boulet Arena,
    [Show full text]
  • Download/2014-Ghg-Emissions-From-Oil-Sands-Tailings-Ponds-Overview- And-Modelling-Based-On-Fermentable-Sub.Pdf (Accessed on 14 May 2021)
    minerals Review Geochemical Stability of Oil Sands Tailings in Mine Closure Landforms Heidi L. Cossey 1, Anya E. Batycky 1 , Heather Kaminsky 2 and Ania C. Ulrich 1,* 1 Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada; [email protected] (H.L.C.); [email protected] (A.E.B.) 2 Centre for Oil Sands Sustainability, Northern Alberta Institute of Technology (NAIT), Edmonton, AB T5G 0Y2, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-780-492-8293 Abstract: Oil sands surface mining in Alberta has generated over a billion cubic metres of waste, known as tailings, consisting of sands, silts, clays, and process-affected water that contains toxic organic compounds and chemical constituents. All of these tailings will eventually be reclaimed and integrated into one of two types of mine closure landforms: end pit lakes (EPLs) or terrestrial landforms with a wetland feature. In EPLs, tailings deposits are capped with several metres of water while in terrestrial landforms, tailings are capped with solid materials, such as sand or overburden. Because tailings landforms are relatively new, past research has heavily focused on the geotechnical and biogeochemical characteristics of tailings in temporary storage ponds, referred to as tailings ponds. As such, the geochemical stability of tailings landforms remains largely unknown. This review discusses five mechanisms of geochemical change expected in tailings landforms: consolidation, chemical mass loading via pore water fluxes, biogeochemical cycling, polymer degradation, and surface water and groundwater interactions. Key considerations and knowledge gaps with regard Citation: Cossey, H.L.; Batycky, A.E.; Kaminsky, H.; Ulrich, A.C.
    [Show full text]
  • LCSH Section H
    H (The sound) H.P. 15 (Bomber) Giha (African people) [P235.5] USE Handley Page V/1500 (Bomber) Ikiha (African people) BT Consonants H.P. 42 (Transport plane) Kiha (African people) Phonetics USE Handley Page H.P. 42 (Transport plane) Waha (African people) H-2 locus H.P. 80 (Jet bomber) BT Ethnology—Tanzania UF H-2 system USE Victor (Jet bomber) Hāʾ (The Arabic letter) BT Immunogenetics H.P. 115 (Supersonic plane) BT Arabic alphabet H 2 regions (Astrophysics) USE Handley Page 115 (Supersonic plane) HA 132 Site (Niederzier, Germany) USE H II regions (Astrophysics) H.P.11 (Bomber) USE Hambach 132 Site (Niederzier, Germany) H-2 system USE Handley Page Type O (Bomber) HA 500 Site (Niederzier, Germany) USE H-2 locus H.P.12 (Bomber) USE Hambach 500 Site (Niederzier, Germany) H-8 (Computer) USE Handley Page Type O (Bomber) HA 512 Site (Niederzier, Germany) USE Heathkit H-8 (Computer) H.P.50 (Bomber) USE Hambach 512 Site (Niederzier, Germany) H-19 (Military transport helicopter) USE Handley Page Heyford (Bomber) HA 516 Site (Niederzier, Germany) USE Chickasaw (Military transport helicopter) H.P. Sutton House (McCook, Neb.) USE Hambach 516 Site (Niederzier, Germany) H-34 Choctaw (Military transport helicopter) USE Sutton House (McCook, Neb.) Ha-erh-pin chih Tʻung-chiang kung lu (China) USE Choctaw (Military transport helicopter) H.R. 10 plans USE Ha Tʻung kung lu (China) H-43 (Military transport helicopter) (Not Subd Geog) USE Keogh plans Ha family (Not Subd Geog) UF Huskie (Military transport helicopter) H.R.D. motorcycle Here are entered works on families with the Kaman H-43 Huskie (Military transport USE Vincent H.R.D.
    [Show full text]