The Creation of a Japanese Writer for the Global Age: the Case of Haruki
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The Creation of a Japanese Writer for the Global Age The Case of Haruki Murakami Alona U. Guevarra Ateneo de Manila University Abstract The case of Haruki Murakami’s rise to dominance in both the Japanese and global literary fields is truly exceptional. It is rare for a single author to intro- duce so much innovation in a literary field in his own lifetime. However, due to the fruitful combination of Murakami’s own talent, the cooperation of his literary collaborators, Murakami, Inc., the advancement in technology (i.e., the Internet) that has allowed Murakami to be in touch with his readers, and his exceptional understanding of English, Murakami has contributed much to Japan’s contemporary literature in the age of global literature. In addition to these factors, it must be emphasized that Murakami’s agency of transforming the conservative literary field of Japan into something more accessible to both the Japanese and the non-Japanese has made Murakami a force that has also transformed Japan’s Post-World War, modern literary field into a field that is open to accommodate postmodern techniques in writing, reflective of its historical position or context and global in its reach. Keywords global literature, Haruki Murakami, Japanese Contemporary Literature, literary field GUEVARRA: THE CREATION OF A JAPANESE WRITER UNITAS 25 Fig. 1. Haruki Murakami’s agency of transforming the conservative literary field of Japan into something more accessible to both the Japanese and the non-Japanese has made him a force that has also transformed Japan’s Post-World War, modern literary field into a field that is open to accommodate postmodern techniques in writing; https://www. nytimes.com/ GUEVARRA: THE CREATION OF A JAPANESE WRITER UNITAS 26 Fig. 2. Murakami paperback covers; https://images.app.goo.gl/tPJFsT4ne6Eq3Ung8 GUEVARRA: THE CREATION OF A JAPANESE WRITER UNITAS 27 Haruki Murakami as a Global Writer The English-speaking world had its first taste of Haruki Murakami’s fiction back in 1990 when Plume (a division of Penguin) books published interna- tionally its translation of Hitsuji o meguru boken (A Wild Sheep Chase [AWSC]). The novel has multiple references to American cultural figures and there is a clear indication that its writing style was inspired by Western writing, particularly that by the novelist, Raymond Chandler. As a result, AWSC did not have the cultural scent that would have easily pigeonholed the novel into the Asian/Oriental/Other classification in which the Western world would have placed texts from Japan and the rest of Asia. AWSC provided a sort of dilemma: it was neither here (Western) or there (Other). It was, in other words, a novel that had a very strong borderless quality that was and still is enigmatic. How Murakami’s fiction was introduced to the West, particularly in the contemporary literary center of New York, has now been a topic of interest since Murakami has become a canonized writer both nationally and inter- nationally. Although Murakami got his break in Japan as the winner of the 22nd Gunzo Literary Prize in 1979 for his Kaze no uta o kike (Hear the Wind Sing) which later would be published by Tokyo’s biggest publisher Kōdansha, Murakami began to accumulate symbolic capital when he broke into the American market. In Louis Templado’s Asahi Shimbun aptly titled article, “Teamwork Helped Haruki Murakami Break into American Scene,” he quotes Tetsu Shirai, a former deputy executive director at Kōdansha International Ltd. who said that the success of AWSC in the US was a product of the consci- entious effort of the publisher Kōdansha International Ltd. to market a then “Japanese writer that the world has never heard of.” The publisher put together a team of American veterans in the publishing industry: “[t]he translation, the editing, the publicity and the marketing strategy were all left to their judgment,” according to Shirai. The strategies that Murakami’s American team initially used to intro- duce him in the US truly were so successful that those strategies continue to see Murakami through over two decades of publication in translation. GUEVARRA: THE CREATION OF A JAPANESE WRITER UNITAS 28 Over the two decades of having his novels and short story collections trans- lated into English, Murakami has never released a work that did not sell in the English-speaking market. He has developed very loyal readers overseas, while he and his literary collaborators have developed a good understanding of these readers. Recounting the initial strategies that Murakami’s US collab- orators made use of during the launch of AWSC, Templado reports: [p]ublicity was done New York style, with advance reading copies of the book (which [Alfred] Birnbaum originally titled “Adventures with a Sheep”) sent to buyers, reviewers, movie industry people, authors, publishing firms, editors, friends and relatives a half year before the novel reached bookstore shelves. That explains how a NYT (New York Times) reviewer met Murakami right as soon as he stepped off the plane, before Shirai and (Elmer) Luke led him around the cocktail party circuit (“Teamwork Helped”). Murakami’s fresh talent, coming unexpectedly from a stiff Japanese literary field, along with the expertise of his supporters from the local and US literary fields (which can be referred to as Murakami, Inc.) is the formula of Murakami’s success. This affirms what Pierre Bourdieu presents in his book The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field (1996) where he argues, through his study of Gustave Flaubert’s career, that an author’s success is not based on his individual talent alone but in the relations the author has within the literary field and the so-called “literary enterprises” that support his works (49). As the years passed, Murakami has established a literary style that capitalizes on almost formulaic surreal plots that loyal readers appear to not tire of. With English as a primary global language, the extent of Murakami’s readership, although not officially tallied, can safely be approximated to be in the millions. In 2016, the Facebook account that one of his American publishers Alfred A. Knopf maintained for him had more than 1.2 million followers worldwide. The hard work that Murakami, Inc. has carried out continues to succeed as there are a growing number of literary awards (what Bourdieu refers to as social capital) that the Japanese literati and interna- tional critics have bestowed upon Murakami’s works. Recent examples of the GUEVARRA: THE CREATION OF A JAPANESE WRITER UNITAS 29 latter include the Franz Kafka award in 2006, the Jerusalem prize in 2009, the International Catalunya Prize in 2011, and most recently, Denmark’s most important literary award, the Hans Christian Andersen Literary Prize in 2015. Murakami is also the recipient of honorary degrees from the univer- sities Princeton and Liège. Therefore, it is not an exaggeration to say that in the global literary landscape, Japanese literature’s contemporary face is that of novelist Haruki Murakami.1 Interestingly, Murakami had no close associations with anyone from the bundan or the Japanese literary establishment when he started to write. He was not a member of any writer’s group and he did not have any acquain- tance who was part of the establishment. Yet, when he completed his first novel, he immediately sent it to Gunzo literary magazine that maintains a contest for upcoming writers. In the 1990s, even when he became estab- lished as an author, Murakami still chose to distance himself from the bundan and the local media. Murakami has this to say about his early relationship with the Japanese literature of his age: “I had never taken a serious look at contemporary Japanese fiction. Thus, I had no idea what kind of Japanese novels were being read at the time, or how I should write fiction in the Japanese language” (“The Birth” x).2 Naturally, without an affinity for Japanese literature, Murakami had to develop a style of writing for his own literary vision. It was this indi- vidual literary vision that facilitated his acceptance by the global market. Murakami criticizes Japanese writing to be “very stiff” (Deveraux, “PW Interviews”). This seriousness is the expectation set by the public for authors. It also appears that the stiffness has something to do with the Japanese language which has a strong hierarchical nature. Therefore, the reason behind Murakami’s innovation of the Japanese language is clear—he wanted more freedom in his prose. He said, “I am different in my style. I guess I’m seeking a new style for Japanese readership, and I think I have gained ground. Things are changing now” (DiConsiglio 15). This linguistic style suited the global culture and its readers. But Murakami sought exile abroad when he became famous in Japan. Murakami’s visiting fellowships in universities abroad during that period, GUEVARRA: THE CREATION OF A JAPANESE WRITER UNITAS 30 while providing him a more relaxed atmosphere to mingle with the Western literati and thus gain footage in an international network, also created some fear in him. Whether in his country or abroad, he still felt like an outsider in the field of literature. He shares: I’m a loner. I don’t like groups, schools, literary circles. At Princeton, there was a luncheonette, or something like that, and I was invited to eat there. Joyce Carol Oates was there and Toni Morrison was there and I was so afraid, I couldn’t eat anything at all! Mary Morris was there and she’s a very nice person, almost the same age as I am, and we became friends, I would say. But in Japan I don’t have any writer friends, because I just want to have…distance (qtd.