DOCSLIB.ORG

City/Park Streetcar Feasibility Study Tc-1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City/Park Streetcar Feasibility Study Tc-1 City/Park STREETCAR Feasibility Study Prepared by: Metropolitan Transit System 1255 Imperial Avenue San Diego, CA 92101 In Association with: Parsons Brinckerhoff 401 B Street, Suite 1650 San Diego, CA 92101 FINAL REPORT October 2012 This study is made possible through the financial participation of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Office of Community Planning Environmental Justice Community-Based Transportation Planning Grant Program. TABLE OF CONTENTS TTCC TABLE OF CONTENTS ES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Study Funding and Guidance ................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.2 Study Purpose and Objectives ................................................................................................................. 1-3 1.3 Need ......................................................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.4 History of Streetcars in San Diego ............................................................................................................ 1-6 1.5 Report Structure ...................................................................................................................................... 1-7 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS .........................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Interstate 5 Bridge ................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Prado Pedestrian Bridge........................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Land Use ................................................................................................................................................... 2-2 2.4 Park Boulevard Right-of-Way ................................................................................................................... 2-4 2.5 Parking ..................................................................................................................................................... 2-7 2.6 Transit Service ........................................................................................................................................ 2-10 2.7 Bicycle Facilities ...................................................................................................................................... 2-10 2.8 Traffic ..................................................................................................................................................... 2-11 2.9 Utilities ................................................................................................................................................... 2-12 2.10 Topography ............................................................................................................................................ 2-12 2.11 Planned Future Facilities ........................................................................................................................ 2-13 2.12 California Public Utility Commission Requirements ............................................................................... 2-17 2.13 Summary ................................................................................................................................................ 2-17 3.0 SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................................................3-1 3.1 Right-of-Way Needs ................................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Lane Design and Width ............................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.3 Station Accommodations ......................................................................................................................... 3-2 3.4 Catenary Wires and Suspension Poles ..................................................................................................... 3-3 3.5 Substations ............................................................................................................................................... 3-4 3.6 Turnaround Locations .............................................................................................................................. 3-6 3.7 Maintenance and Storage Facilities ......................................................................................................... 3-6 3.8 Mid-Block Crossovers ............................................................................................................................... 3-7 4.0 STREETCAR VEHICLES ...........................................................................................................4-1 4.1 Vehicle Types ........................................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Vehicle Specifications ............................................................................................................................... 4-4 4.3 Directional and Access Capabilities .......................................................................................................... 4-8 4.4 Compatibility with San Diego Trolley ....................................................................................................... 4-9 4.5 Availability .............................................................................................................................................. 4-10 4.6 Reliability ................................................................................................................................................ 4-10 4.7 Cost ........................................................................................................................................................ 4-12 4.8 Summary ................................................................................................................................................ 4-13 CITY/PARK STREETCAR FEASIBILITY STUDY TC-1 TTCC TABLE OF CONTENTS 5.0 OPERATIONS PLAN ...............................................................................................................5-1 5.1 Existing Services ....................................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 Route Options .......................................................................................................................................... 5-3 5.3 Scheduling ................................................................................................................................................ 5-5 5.4 Vehicle Requirement ................................................................................................................................ 5-7 5.5 Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimate ........................................................................................... 5-8 6.0 ALIGNMENT CONCEPTS AND EVALUATION ...........................................................................6-1 6.1 Selection of Park Boulevard Alignment .................................................................................................... 6-1 6.2 Alignment Concepts ................................................................................................................................. 6-4 6.3 Concepts: North of Interstate 5 to Zoo Place ........................................................................................... 6-7 6.4 Concept: South of Interstate 5 to C Street ............................................................................................. 6-13 6.5 Concept: Interstate 5 Bridge .................................................................................................................. 6-14 6.6 Concepts: End of Line ............................................................................................................................. 6-18 6.7 Station Locations .................................................................................................................................... 6-26 7.0 RIDERSHIP ESTIMATE ...........................................................................................................7-1 7.1 Existing Ridership ..................................................................................................................................... 7-1 7.2 Implications of Future Transit Service ...................................................................................................... 7-2 7.3 Current Transit Markets Served and Ridership Characteristics ............................................................... 7-3 7.4 Ridership Assumptions ............................................................................................................................. 7-3 7.5 Peer Analysis ...........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FY 2027 HART Transit Development Plan
    Hillsborough Area Regional Transit (HART) Transit Development Plan 2018 - 2027 Major Update Final Report September 2017 Prepared for Prepared by HART | TDP i Table of Contents Section 1: Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1-1 Objectives of the Plan ......................................................................................................................................... 1-1 State Requirements ............................................................................................................................................ 1-2 TDP Checklist ...................................................................................................................................................... 1-2 Organization of the Report .................................................................................................................................. 1-4 Section 2: Baseline Conditions ...................................................................................................................... 2-1 Study Area Description ....................................................................................................................................... 2-1 Population Trends and Characteristics ............................................................................................................. 2-3 Journey-to-Work Characteristics .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • San Diego's Class 1 Streetcars
    San Diego’s Class 1 Streetcars Historic Landmark #339 Our History, Our Heritage, and Our Future 1910 - 1912: The Panama-California Exposition and the Creation of the Class 1 Streetcars In 1910 the long awaited opening of the Panama Canal was fast approaching. San Diego's leaders decided to use this event to advertise San Diego as the port of choice for ships traveling through the canal by holding the Panama-California Exposition. It was set to take place in 1915 and would be held on a parcel of land just north of downtown, soon to be named Balboa Park. Early San Diego developer and streetcar system owner, John D. Spreckels, directed his engineers at the San Diego Electric Railway Company to design a special new "state of the art" streetcar to carry patrons to and from the exposition at Balboa Park. The mastercar builders at the San Diego Electric Railway Co. designed a unique new streetcar just for San Diego's mild climate. These large and beautiful Arts & Crafts style streetcars became known as San Diego’s Class 1 streetcars. Spreckels approved the designs and an order for 24 of these brand new streetcars was sent to the renowned St. Louis Car Company for construction. 1912 - 1939: Class 1 Streetcars in operation throughout San Diego The Class 1 streetcars provided fun and dependable transportation to countless thousands of patrons from 1912 to 1939. They operated throughout all of San Diego's historic districts and neighborhoods, as well as to many outlying areas. The Class 1 streetcars successfully supplied the transportation needs for the large crowds that attended the 1915 Panama-California Exposition, and went on to serve through WWI, the Roaring Twenties, and the Great Depression.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study
    Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks
    [Show full text]
  • United-2016-2021.Pdf
    27010_Contract_JCBA-FA_v10-cover.pdf 1 4/5/17 7:41 AM 2016 – 2021 Flight Attendant Agreement Association of Flight Attendants – CWA 27010_Contract_JCBA-FA_v10-cover.indd170326_L01_CRV.indd 1 1 3/31/174/5/17 7:533:59 AMPM TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 Recognition, Successorship and Mergers . 1 Section 2 Definitions . 4 Section 3 General . 10 Section 4 Compensation . 28 Section 5 Expenses, Transportation and Lodging . 36 Section 6 Minimum Pay and Credit, Hours of Service, and Contractual Legalities . 42 Section 7 Scheduling . 56 Section 8 Reserve Scheduling Procedures . 88 Section 9 Special Qualification Flight Attendants . 107 Section 10 AMC Operation . .116 Section 11 Training & General Meetings . 120 Section 12 Vacations . 125 Section 13 Sick Leave . 136 Section 14 Seniority . 143 Section 15 Leaves of Absence . 146 Section 16 Job Share and Partnership Flying Programs . 158 Section 17 Filling of Vacancies . 164 Section 18 Reduction in Personnel . .171 Section 19 Safety, Health and Security . .176 Section 20 Medical Examinations . 180 Section 21 Alcohol and Drug Testing . 183 Section 22 Personnel Files . 190 Section 23 Investigations & Grievances . 193 Section 24 System Board of Adjustment . 206 Section 25 Uniforms . 211 Section 26 Moving Expenses . 215 Section 27 Missing, Interned, Hostage or Prisoner of War . 217 Section 28 Commuter Program . 219 Section 29 Benefits . 223 Section 30 Union Activities . 265 Section 31 Union Security and Check-Off . 273 Section 32 Duration . 278 i LETTERS OF AGREEMENT LOA 1 20 Year Passes . 280 LOA 2 767 Crew Rest . 283 LOA 3 787 – 777 Aircraft Exchange . 285 LOA 4 AFA PAC Letter . 287 LOA 5 AFA Staff Travel .
    [Show full text]
  • TCRP Report 52: Joint Operation of Light Rail Transit Or Diesel Multiple
    APPENDIX A Key FRA Regulations (Affecting Joint Use) The following is a listing of key FRA specifications. This listing is intended as a regulations taken from the Code of Federal general identification of the operative code Regulations (49 CFR 200-299), Federal sections, along with a general description Railroad Administration, that may affect of the requirements. This identification joint operation of light rail transit or diesel code section should not imply or impute multiple unit vehicles with railroads. The that the code provision will need to be selected regulations concern operational modified to operate light rail transit or procedures, standards, and certain design DMU with railroads. Regulation Number and Section Comment §209: Railroad Safety Enforcement Policy procedures for assessing Procedures penalties and for appealing penalties. Also includes, fitness-for-duty and follow-up on FRA recommendations. §210: Railroad Noise Emission Covers total sound emitted by moving Compliance Regulations rail cars and locomotives. Does not apply to: • Steam engines; • Street, suburban, or interurban electric railways, unless operated as a part of the general railroad system of transportation; • Sound emitted by warning devices such as horns, whistles, or bells when operated for the purpose of safety; • Special-purpose equipment that may be located on or operated from rail cars. §211: Rules of Practice Subpart C - Rules of practice that apply to Waivers rulemaking and waiver proceedings, review of emergency orders issued §211.41: Processing of petitions for under 45 U.S.C. 432, and miscellaneous waiver of safety rules safety-related proceedings and informal safety inquiries. Page A-1 Regulation Number and Section Comment §212: State Safety Participation Establishes standards and procedures for Regulations State participation in investigative and surveillance activities under Federal railroad safety laws and regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Element 08-08-08 – NON ADOPTED PORTION
    Future of Hillsborough Comprehensive Plan for Unincorporated Hillsborough County Florida TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT As Amended by the Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners June 5, 2008 (Ordinance 08- 13) Department of Community Affairs Notice of Intent to Find Comprehensive Plan Amendments in Compliance published August 4, 2008 {DCA PA No. 08-1ER-NOI-2901- (A)-(l)} August 26, 2008 Effective Date This Page Intentionally Blank. 2 Hillsborough County Transportation Element Hillsborough County Transportation Element TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 7 II. INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS ............................................................ 15 III. FUTURE NEEDS AND ALTERNATIVES............................................ 81 IV. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES............................................121 V. PLAN IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING ..................................161 VI. DEFINITIONS ................................................................................167 Sections IV, V, VI, Appendix C, D, G, I, and Appendix J Maps 2, 2B, 15, and 25 of the Transportation Element have been adopted by the Board of County Commissioners as required by Part II, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. The remainder of the Transportation Element and appendices contains background information. Hillsborough County Transportation Element 3 TRANSPORTATION APPENDIX A-J Appendix A Inventory of State Roads in Hillsborough County Appendix B Inventory of County Roads
    [Show full text]
  • Volume I Restoration of Historic Streetcar Service
    VOLUME I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT RESTORATION OF HISTORIC STREETCAR SERVICE IN DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES J U LY 2 0 1 8 City of Los Angeles Department of Public Works, Bureau of Engineering Table of Contents Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................. ES-1 ES.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... ES-1 ES.2 Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................................................... ES-1 ES.3 Background ............................................................................................................................................................ ES-2 ES.4 7th Street Alignment Alternative ................................................................................................................... ES-3 ES.5 Safety ........................................................................................................................................................................ ES-7 ES.6 Construction .......................................................................................................................................................... ES-7 ES.7 Operations and Ridership ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Other Trams in the Bendigo Fleet
    Other trams in the Bendigo Fleet The status of the trams in the list below are one of the following: A. In storage B. Being restored/awaiting restoration C. On static display at the tramways D. On loan or lease to other tramways Tram Number: Historic and technical details: #2 Status: In storage Maximum Traction Bogie Tram History: This tram first operated in Melbourne as Hawthorn Tramways Trust #20. With the formation of the Melbourne and Metropolitan Tramways Board, it became M&MTB # 126. It was sold to the SECV Geelong Tramways in 1947 to become #34. Upon the closure of the Geelong Tramways in 1956, the tram was transferred to Bendigo where it became #2. Builder: Duncan & Fraser, Adelaide, South Australia (1916) for the Hawthorn Tramways Trust as #20. Technical Information: Trucks - Brill 22E. Motors - 2 X 65 hp GE 201. Controllers - GE B23E. Braking - hand brakes and air operated manual-lapping valves. Weight - 16.0 tonnes. Length - 13.59 metres. #3 Status: Undergoing restoration at the main depot. Single Truck Battery Tram History: Tram services using these trams commenced in June 1890 but because of the inefficiency of the battery trams, the entire system was abandoned in September 1890 and the assets sold to the Bendigo Tramway Company Limited. Builder: Brush Electrical Engineering Company Limited, Loughborough, United Kingdom (1889) for the Sandhurst and Eaglehawk Tramway Company Limited (S&ETCo Ltd) as #3. Technical Information: The trams were powered by a single motor, with a wheel operated controller located on each platform. Braking was obtained by the use of a hand brake also located on each platform.
    [Show full text]
  • Rolling Stock Orders: Who
    THE INTERNATIONAL LIGHT RAIL MAGAZINE HEADLINES l Toronto’s streetcar advocates fight back l UK’s Midland Metro expansion approved l Democrats propose more US light rail ROLLING STOCK ORDERS: WHO... WHAT... HOW MUCH? Ukrainian tramways under the microscope US streetcar trends: Mixed fleets: How technology Lessons from is helping change over a century 75 America’s attitude of experience to urban rail in Budapest APRIL 2012 No. 892 1937–2012 WWW. LRTA . ORG l WWW. TRAMNEWS . NET £3.80 TAUT_April12_Cover.indd 1 28/2/12 09:20:59 TAUT_April12_UITPad.indd 1 28/2/12 12:38:16 Contents The official journal of the Light Rail Transit Association 128 News 132 APRIL 2012 Vol. 75 No. 892 Toronto light rail supporters fight back; Final approval for www.tramnews.net Midland Metro expansion; Obama’s budget detailed. EDITORIAL Editor: Simon Johnston 132 Rolling stock orders: Boom before bust? Tel: +44 (0)1832 281131 E-mail: [email protected] With packed order books for the big manufacturers over Eaglethorpe Barns, Warmington, Peterborough PE8 6TJ, UK. the next five years, smaller players are increasing their Associate Editor: Tony Streeter market share. Michael Taplin reports. E-mail: [email protected] 135 Ukraine’s road to Euro 2012 Worldwide Editor: Michael Taplin Flat 1, 10 Hope Road, Shanklin, Isle of Wight PO37 6EA, UK. Mike Russell reports on tramway developments and 135 E-mail: [email protected] operations in this former Soviet country. News Editor: John Symons 140 The new environment for streetcars 17 Whitmore Avenue, Werrington, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffs ST9 0LW, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison Between Bus Rapid Transit and Light-Rail Transit Systems: a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Approach
    Urban Transport XXIII 143 COMPARISON BETWEEN BUS RAPID TRANSIT AND LIGHT-RAIL TRANSIT SYSTEMS: A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS APPROACH MARÍA EUGENIA LÓPEZ LAMBAS1, NADIA GIUFFRIDA2, MATTEO IGNACCOLO2 & GIUSEPPE INTURRI2 1TRANSyT, Transport Research Centre, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain 2Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture (DICAR), University of Catania, Italy ABSTRACT The construction choice between two different transport systems in urban areas, as in the case of Light-Rail Transit (LRT) and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) solutions, is often performed on the basis of cost-benefit analysis and geometrical constraints due to the available space for the infrastructure. Classical economic analysis techniques are often unable to take into account some of the non-monetary parameters which have a huge impact on the final result of the choice, since they often include social acceptance and sustainability aspects. The application of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) techniques can aid decision makers in the selection process, with the possibility to compare non-homogeneous criteria, both qualitative and quantitative, and allowing the generation of an objective ranking of the different alternatives. The coupling of MCDA and Geographic Information System (GIS) environments also permits an easier and faster analysis of spatial parameters, and a clearer representation of indicator comparisons. Based on these assumptions, a LRT and BRT system will be analysed according to their own transportation, economic, social and environmental impacts as a hypothetical exercise; moreover, through the use of MCDA techniques a global score for both systems will be determined, in order to allow for a fully comprehensive comparison. Keywords: BHLS, urban transport, transit systems, TOPSIS.
    [Show full text]
  • A Ride Through Victoria's Tramway Culture
    Trammies A ride through Victoria’s tramway culture Trammies tells of Victoria’s rich and colourful tramway history from 1885 to the present. Discover when trams started, why they survived against the odds and the characters who continue to work on them. 21 February – 11 May 2003 The Trammie Family The trammie family is an experience for many of us who put on the tram uniform. Our common costume helps identify us to the public and to our co-workers, while shiftwork has us out and about at odd times; early morning, late at night, and of course during the day. Trammies meet with Melbourne’s citizenry every day, as well as the many visitors to our city that jump on for a ride. Trammies gather around the pool table at the Malvern Depot. Trammies work from Melbourne’s eight tram depots, while others work at the Preston Workshops, Civil Branch and the Overhead Electrical Department. Together they share the day’s experiences and have the long standing tradition of socialising through tramway social clubs, inter-depot competitions, balls, picnics and barbeques. This social tradition was encouraged in the days of the Melbourne & Metropolitan Tramways Board who actively sought to develop and encourage a harmonious ‘trammie family'. East Preston Depot vs South Melbourne Depot football match, 1995. South won! Ballarat Tramways Social Club, Grenville Street, Excerpts from the MMTB News, 1964 and 1967. c.1930s. Courtesy of Ballarat Tramway Museum. Melbourne’s 2003 Depots Brunswick Camberwell East Preston Essendon Glenhuntly Kew Malvern Southbank Melbourne – A Rare Tramway Survivor The changing fortunes of trams The Melbourne tramway system is the only surviving complete tramway system in the English-speaking world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transfer Newsletter Spring 2013.Cdr
    Oregon Electric Railway Historical Society Volume 18 503 Issue 2 Spring 2013 Reminder to members: Please be sure your dues In this issue: are up to date. 2013 dues were due Jan 1, 2013. Willamette Shore Trolley - Back on Track.................................1 If it has been longer than one year since you renewed, Interpretive Center Update - Greg Bonn...............................2 go to our website: oerhs.org and download an Vintage Trolley History - Richard Thompson.............................3 application by clicking: Become a Member Pacific NW Transit Update - Roy Bonn...............................8 Spotlight on Members: Charlie Philpot ................................11 Setting New Poles - Greg Bonn..............................................12 Willamette Shore Trolley ....back on track! See this issue in color on line at oerhs.org/transfer miles from Lake Oswego to Riverwood Crossing with an ultimate plan to extend to Portland. Also see the article on page 3 on the history of the cars of Vintage Trolley. Dave Rowe installing wires from Generator to Trolley. Hal Rosene at the controls of 514 on a training run emerging Gage Giest painting from the Elk Rock Tunnel on the Willamette Shore line. the front of Trolley. Wayne Jones photo The Flume car in background will be After a several-year hiatus, the Willamette Shore our emergency tow Trolley is just about ready to roll. Last minute electrical and vehicle if the Trolley mechanical details and regulatory compliance testing are breaks down on the nearing completion. With many stakeholders involved and mainline. many technical issues that had to be overcome, it has been a challenge to get the system to the 100% state. Dave Rowe and his team have been working long hours to overcome the obstacles of getting Gomaco built Vintage Trolley #514, its Doug Allen removing old stickers from side tag-along generator, track work, electrical systems, crew of Trolley training, safety compliance issues, propulsion, braking, and so many other details to a satisfactory state to begin revenue service.
    [Show full text]