DOCSLIB.ORG

Monday Through Friday Mt

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

New printed schedules will not be issued if trips are adjusted Monday through Friday All trips accessible by five minutes or less. Please visit www.go-metro.com for the go smart... go METRO 24 most up-to-date schedule. 24 Mt. Lookout–Uptown–Anderson Riding Metro From Anderson / To Downtown From Downtown / To Anderson . 1 No food, beverages or smoking on Metro. 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2. Offer front seats to older adults and people with disabilities. METRO* PLUS 3. All Metro buses are 100% accessible for people 38X with disabilities. 46 UNIVERSITY OF 4. Use headphones with all audio equipment 51 CINCINNATI GOODMAN DANA MEDICAL CENTER HIGHLAND including cell phones. Anderson Center Station P&R Salem Rd. & Beacon St. & Beechmont Ave. St. Corbly & Ave. Linwood Delta Ave. & Madison Ave. Observatory Ave. Martin Luther King & Reading Rd. & Auburn Ave. McMillan St. Liberty St. & Sycamore St. Square Government Area B Square Government Area B Liberty St. & Sycamore St. & Auburn Ave. McMillan St. Martin Luther King & Reading Rd. & Madison Ave. Observatory Ave. & Ave. Linwood Delta Ave. & Beechmont Ave. St. Corbly Salem Rd. & Beacon St. Anderson Center Station P&R 11 ZONE 2 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 2 43 5. Fold strollers and carts. BURNET MT. LOOKOUT AM AM 38X 4:38 4:49 4:57 5:05 5:11 5:20 5:29 5:35 5:40 — — — — 4:10 4:15 4:23 — 4:35 OBSERVATORY READING O’BRYONVILLE LINWOOD 6. Remove hoods and face masks; exceptions: small 51 78 M. L. KING GILBERT 5 5:20 5:32 5:40 5:49 5:56 6:06 6:16 6:23 6:30 — — — — 4:52 4:57 5:05 — 5:17 EDEN children and those observing religious or cultural UNIVERSITY OF JEFFERSON 4 DESALES 5:55 6:07 6:15 6:25 6:32 6:43 6:54 7:01 7:08 — — — — 5:27 5:32 5:40 — 5:52 CINCINNATI CORNER customs. 6:14 6:27 6:35 6:45 6:52 7:03 7:15 7:22 7:30 — — — — 5:46 5:51 5:59 — 6:11 UNIVERSITY MADISON METRO* 19 78 PLUS DELTA 7. Report any suspicious packages or behavior to 6:56 7:08 7:15 7:24 7:31 7:42 7:54 8:02 8:10 *5:45 5:52 6:00 6:11 6:19 6:24 6:32 6:38 6:52 4 25X CORRY HYDE operator. 7:26 7:38 7:45 7:54 8:01 8:12 8:24 8:32 8:40 — — — — 6:58 7:03 7:11 — 7:23 11 31 6 8:05 8:17 8:24 8:33 8:40 8:51 9:03 9:11 9:19 6:30 6:37 6:45 6:57 7:06 7:11 7:19 7:25 7:40 PARK LINWOOD 8. Children under 35 inches ride free; children EUCLID G8:22 — 8:33 8:41 8:46 — — — — 7:08 7:17 7:25 7:38 7:48 7:53 8:01 8:07 8:22 3 McMILLAN between 35 and 45 inches pay half fare. WOODBURN 8:54 9:06 9:13 9:22 9:28 9:38 9:51 9:59 10:08 7:30 7:39 7:47 8:00 8:10 8:15 8:23 8:29 8:44 US PUBLIC HEALTH 9. Transfers $.50, good for up to two additional 19 46 31 38X AUBURN SERVICE CENTER 9:42 9:54 10:01 10:10 10:16 10:26 10:39 10:47 10:56 8:10 8:19 8:27 8:40 8:50 8:55 9:03 9:09 9:24 DOWNTOWN ROUTING buses or 120 minutes, whichever comes first. 10:17 10:29 10:36 10:45 10:51 11:01 11:14 11:22 11:31 8:40 8:50 8:58 9:11 9:21 9:26 9:35 9:42 9:57 CHRIST HOSPITAL 10:54 11:05 11:12 11:21 11:27 11:39 11:52 12:01 12:10 10. All riders must pay fare – NO EXCEPTIONS. 9:19 9:29 9:37 9:50 10:00 10:05 10:14 10:21 10:36 38X 11:44 11:55 12:02 12:11 12:17 12:29 12:42 12:51 1:00 10:08 10:18 10:26 10:39 10:49 10:54 11:03 11:10 11:25 BEECHMONT MT. AUBURN CENTRAL PKWY RIVERSIDE Viajando en Metro PM 12:29 12:40 12:47 12:56 1:02 1:14 1:27 1:36 1:45 COLUMBIA PKWY 10:56 11:06 11:14 11:27 11:37 11:42 11:51 11:58 12:13 HIGHLAND 1:09 1:20 1:27 1:36 1:42 1:54 2:07 2:16 2:25 11:31 11:42 11:50 12:03 12:13 12:19 12:28 12:35 12:50 DORCHESTER . 1 Se prohíbe comer, beber o fumar en el Metro. MT. WASHINGTON 1:47 2:00 2:07 2:16 2:22 2:33 2:47 2:56 3:05 PM 12:10 12:21 12:29 12:42 12:52 12:58 1:07 1:14 1:29 PUBLIC LIBRARY OF 2. Ofrezca los asientos de adelante a los adultos COURT CINCINNATI AND HAMILTON COUNTY 2:32 2:45 2:52 3:01 3:07 3:18 3:32 3:41 3:50 1:00 1:11 1:20 1:33 1:43 1:49 1:58 2:06 2:23 LIBERTY PUBLIC LIBRARY OF mayores y a las personas con discapacidades. 2 30X CINCINNATI AND ANDERSON BRANCH 2:50 3:02 3:09 3:18 3:24 3:34 3:47 3:56 4:05 — — — — 2:22 2:27 2:35 — 2:47 SYCAMORE HAMILTON COUNTY CORBLY 3. Todos los autobuses Metro son 100% accesibles 3:10 3:22 3:29 3:38 3:44 3:54 4:07 4:16 4:25 1:45 1:56 2:05 2:18 2:28 2:34 2:43 2:51 3:08 16 19 7 MT. WASHINGTON BRANCH MERCY ANDERSON 9TH HOSPITAL CENTER para personas con discapacidades. 3:35 3:47 3:54 4:03 4:09 4:19 4:32 4:41 4:50 CENTRAL PKWY CAMPUS — — — — 2:42 2:47 2:55 — 3:07 ZONE 2 STATION 4:08 4:20 4:27 4:36 4:42 4:52 5:05 5:14 5:23 2:25 2:35 2:44 2:58 3:09 3:16 3:25 3:33 3:50 BEECHMONT PARK & RIDE 4. Use auriculares con todo equipo de audio, incluso LEGEND STATE VINE 30X MAIN 5:03 5:16 5:23 5:32 5:38 5:47 5:59 6:07 6:15 3:05 3:15 3:24 3:38 3:49 3:56 4:05 4:13 4:30 WALNUT MAIN teléfonos celulares. 8TH ANDERSON 9 75X G5:15 — 5:26 5:34 5:39 — — — — 3:50 WALNUT TOWNE CENTER 4:00 4:09 4:23 4:34 4:41 4:50 4:58 5:15 BEACON . liegue los coches de bebés y los carros. 5 P SUTTON 30X Route 24 81X G5:30 — 5:41 5:49 5:54 — — — — 4:05 4:15 4:24 4:38 4:49 4:56 5:05 5:13 5:30 SYCAMORE BEECHMONT 6. Quítese las capuchas y las máscaras para la cara, G6:16 — 6:27 6:35 6:40 — — — — 4:25 4:35 4:44 4:58 5:09 5:16 5:25 5:33 5:50 Time Point WOLFANGEL 5TH 7TH 8 salvo: los niños pequeños y quienes observan 1 BIRNEY 6:11 6:23 6:30 6:39 6:45 6:54 7:04 7:12 7:20 4:50 4:59 5:08 5:22 5:33 5:41 5:50 5:58 6:13 SALEM Layover Point 81X 30X costumbres religiosas o culturales. 7:06 7:18 7:25 7:33 7:38 7:46 7:56 8:03 8:10 5:23 5:32 5:41 5:55 6:06 6:14 6:23 6:31 6:46 Downtown Bus Stop MARKLEY 75X 7. Informe sobre cualquier paquete o conducta 7:56 8:08 8:15 8:23 8:28 8:36 8:46 8:53 9:00 6:15 6:23 6:30 6:41 6:51 6:58 7:07 7:14 7:29 BEECH ACRES CENTER FIVE MILE 6TH 81X 6881 BEECHMONT sospechosos al operador G8:34 — 8:45 8:53 8:58 — — — — 7:20 7:28 7:35 7:46 7:56 8:03 8:12 8:19 8:34 Connecting Route 9:46 9:58 10:05 10:13 10:18 10:26 10:36 10:43 10:50 *8:15 8:23 8:31 8:42 8:51 8:57 9:06 9:13 9:28 GOVT. SQUARE Area B ANDERSON TWP. 8. Los niños con estatura menor a 35 pulgadas G10:18 — 10:29 10:37 10:42 — — — — *9:10 9:17 9:24 9:35 9:43 9:48 9:56 10:03 10:18 ZONE 2 Begin Zone 2 Fare at Beechmont & Birney 5TH 1 (88,9 cm) viajan gratis; los niños entre las 35 AM G12:13 — 12:24 12:32 12:37 — — — — *11:05 11:12 11:19 11:30 11:38 11:43 11:51 11:58 12:13 (88,9 cm) y las 45 pulgadas (1,14 m) de estatura abonan media tarifa.
Recommended publications
  • United-2016-2021.Pdf

    United-2016-2021.Pdf

    27010_Contract_JCBA-FA_v10-cover.pdf 1 4/5/17 7:41 AM 2016 – 2021 Flight Attendant Agreement Association of Flight Attendants – CWA 27010_Contract_JCBA-FA_v10-cover.indd170326_L01_CRV.indd 1 1 3/31/174/5/17 7:533:59 AMPM TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 Recognition, Successorship and Mergers . 1 Section 2 Definitions . 4 Section 3 General . 10 Section 4 Compensation . 28 Section 5 Expenses, Transportation and Lodging . 36 Section 6 Minimum Pay and Credit, Hours of Service, and Contractual Legalities . 42 Section 7 Scheduling . 56 Section 8 Reserve Scheduling Procedures . 88 Section 9 Special Qualification Flight Attendants . 107 Section 10 AMC Operation . .116 Section 11 Training & General Meetings . 120 Section 12 Vacations . 125 Section 13 Sick Leave . 136 Section 14 Seniority . 143 Section 15 Leaves of Absence . 146 Section 16 Job Share and Partnership Flying Programs . 158 Section 17 Filling of Vacancies . 164 Section 18 Reduction in Personnel . .171 Section 19 Safety, Health and Security . .176 Section 20 Medical Examinations . 180 Section 21 Alcohol and Drug Testing . 183 Section 22 Personnel Files . 190 Section 23 Investigations & Grievances . 193 Section 24 System Board of Adjustment . 206 Section 25 Uniforms . 211 Section 26 Moving Expenses . 215 Section 27 Missing, Interned, Hostage or Prisoner of War . 217 Section 28 Commuter Program . 219 Section 29 Benefits . 223 Section 30 Union Activities . 265 Section 31 Union Security and Check-Off . 273 Section 32 Duration . 278 i LETTERS OF AGREEMENT LOA 1 20 Year Passes . 280 LOA 2 767 Crew Rest . 283 LOA 3 787 – 777 Aircraft Exchange . 285 LOA 4 AFA PAC Letter . 287 LOA 5 AFA Staff Travel .
  • Volume I Restoration of Historic Streetcar Service

    Volume I Restoration of Historic Streetcar Service

    VOLUME I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT RESTORATION OF HISTORIC STREETCAR SERVICE IN DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES J U LY 2 0 1 8 City of Los Angeles Department of Public Works, Bureau of Engineering Table of Contents Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................. ES-1 ES.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... ES-1 ES.2 Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................................................... ES-1 ES.3 Background ............................................................................................................................................................ ES-2 ES.4 7th Street Alignment Alternative ................................................................................................................... ES-3 ES.5 Safety ........................................................................................................................................................................ ES-7 ES.6 Construction .......................................................................................................................................................... ES-7 ES.7 Operations and Ridership ...............................................................................................................................
  • Balancing Passenger Preferences and Operational Efficiency in Network

    Balancing Passenger Preferences and Operational Efficiency in Network

    Risk Averseness Regarding Short Connections in Airline Itinerary Choice AV020 Annual Meeting 2006 Submission Date: 01 April 2006, Word Count: 6902 By: Georg Theis Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Room 35-217 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02139 Tel.: (617) 253-3507 Fax: (270) 968-5529 Email: [email protected] Thomas Adler Resource Systems Group 55 Railroad Row White River Junction, VT 05001 Tel.: (802) 295-4999 Fax: (802) 295-1006 Email: [email protected] John-Paul Clarke School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0150 Tel: (404) 385-7206 Fax: (404) 894-2760 Email: [email protected] Moshe Ben-Akiva Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Room 1-181 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02139 Tel.: (617) 253-5324 Fax: (617) 253-0082 Email: [email protected] Theis et al. 2 ABSTRACT Network airlines traditionally attempt to minimize passenger connecting times at hub airports based on the assumption that passengers prefer minimum scheduled elapsed times for their trips. Minimizing connecting times, however, creates peaks in hub airports’ schedules. These peaks are extremely cost intensive in terms of additional personnel, resources, runway capacity and schedule recovery. Consequently, passenger connecting times should only be minimized if the anticipated revenue gain of minimizing passenger connecting times is larger than the increase in operating cost, i.e. if this policy increases overall operating profit. This research analyzes to what extent a change in elapsed time impacts passenger itinerary choice and thus an airline’s market share. We extend an existing airline itinerary choice survey to test the assumption that passenger demand is affected by the length of connecting times.
  • The Effects of Fare-Collection Strategies on Transit Level of Service

    The Effects of Fare-Collection Strategies on Transit Level of Service

    Transportation Research Record 1036 79 The Effects of Fare-Collection Strategies on Transit Level of Service UPALI VANDEBONA and ANTHONY J. RICHARDSON ABSTRACT It is known that different fare-collection strategies have different passenger boarding and alighting rates for street-based public transport services. In this pape r, various models of stop service times are reviewed, the available empirical observations of boarding and alighting rates are summarized, and the effects of different average boarding rates and coefficients of variation of boarding rates on the route performance of a tram (light rail transit) service are examined. The analysis is conducted using the TRAMS (Transit Route Anima­ tion and Modeling by Simulation) package. This modeling package is briefly described with particular attention to the passenger demand subroutine as well as the tram stop service times subroutine. As a result o f the analysis , it was found that slower boarding rates produce a slower and less reliable service along the route. The variability of boarding rates has no effect on route travel time but does contribute to greater unreliability in level of service. It is concluded that these level-of-service effects need to be considered when assessing the effect of changes in fare-collection strategies. Public transport operators and managers have found systems to proof-of-payment systems will generally themselves under increasing pressure in recent years bring about significant level-of-service improve­ because of conflicting expectations from different ments that should be considered in any analysis of groups in the community. On the one hand, public such fare collection strategies.
  • Reduced Cost Metro Transportation for People with Disabilities

    Reduced Cost Metro Transportation for People with Disabilities

    REDUCED COST AND FREE METRO TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES Individual Day Supports are tailored services and supports that are provided to a person or a small group of no more than two (2) people, in the community. This service lends very well to the use of public transportation and associated travel training, allowing for active learning while exploring the community and its resources. While the set rate includes funding for transportation, it is important to be resourceful when possible, using available discount programs to make your funds go further. METRO TRANSIT ACCESSIBILITY CENTER The Metro Transit Accessibility Center (202)962-2700 located at Metro headquarters, 600 Fifth Street NW, Washington, DC 20001, offers the following services to people with disabilities: Information and application materials for the Reduced Fare (half fare) program for Metrobus and Metrorail Information and application materials for the MetroAccess paratransit service Consultations and functional assessments to determine eligibility for MetroAccess paratransit service Replacement ID cards for MetroAccess customers Support (by phone) for resetting your MetroAccess EZ-Pay or InstantAccess password The Transit Accessibility Center office hours are 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. weekdays, with the exception of Tuesdays with hours from 8 a.m. - 2:30 p.m. REDUCED FAIR PROGRAM Metro offers reduced fare for people with disabilities who require accessibility features to use public transportation and who have a valid Metro Disability ID. The Metro Disability ID card offers a discount of half the peak fare on Metrorail, and a reduced fare of for 90¢ cash, or 80¢ paying with a SmarTrip® card on regular Metrobus routes, and a discounted fare on other participating bus service providers.
  • PATCO New Automated Fare Collection System, Smart Card Or Magnetic- Your Choice

    PATCO New Automated Fare Collection System, Smart Card Or Magnetic- Your Choice

    PATCO New Automated Fare Collection System, Smart card or Magnetic- Your choice PATCO’s new fare collection system will feature the FREEDOM card, which will revolutionize how customers purchase their fares and travel on the PATCO system. The FREEDOM card is a smart card that will provide a high level of convenience and reliability to customers who use PATCO consistently. For customers who do not opt to use the FREEDOM card or who use PATCO infrequently, new magnetic tickets will be available. In PATCO’s current fare system, plastic tickets that use first generation magnetic technology are used. Although that technology was state of the art several decades ago, the technology is outdated and the tickets are prone to damage by devices commonly found in today’s environment. Unlike the current tickets, which are re-encoded numerous times for use after being captured by the fare gates, the new magnetic tickets will be paper tickets and will not be reused after capture. The new magnetic tickets can be purchased using either cash or coins. This means that customers choosing to purchase a ticket will not have to first stop at a change machine to convert their bills to coins. Both one- and two-ride tickets can be purchased from all new ticket vending machines located outside the fare gates. A customer wishing to purchase a magnetic ticket will simply select the prompt on the ticket vending machine screen for purchase of a ticket and then select the destination and whether a single ride or double ride ticket is desired. The ticket vending machine will list the price of the purchase.
  • Effect of Fares on Transit Riding

    Effect of Fares on Transit Riding

    Effect of Fares on Transit Riding JOHN F. CURTIN, Partner, Simpson & Curtin, Philadelphia • FARES are perhaps the most sensitive aspect of transit service-balancing uneasily between political pressures and the need for operating revenue. Political campaigns in major American cities have been won and lost over transit fare issues, and there is substantial evidence that patrons react to fare increases at the turnstiles as well as at the polls. The correlation of price increase with loss of transit riding has been well established. Most utility commissions use a variation of the "shrinkage formula" devised by our firm more than 20 years ago when pressures of inflation first became manifest in fare increase proposals by transit companies. But the corollary questions of price differential among competing transit services, and the effect of joint fares in coordinated transit operations, have not been so well explored. What is the "sub-modal split" of riding between surface and rapid transit connecting two points, when the fare is 15 cents on one and 25 cents on the other? How much added traffic is attracted to rapid transit when the feeder bus fare is dropped from 20cents to 10 cents? When feeder and trunk lines are separate operations, how should the feeder line discount in the combination fare be shared between them? These are fundamental questions of revenue and cost apportionment in developing coordination between surface and rapid transit systems. Auto travel switches freely between systems-from county roads to city streets to state highways-without motor­ ists' awareness; division of motor fuel revenues among these systems is accomplished by legislative standards with varying degrees of sophistication.
  • Fare Policy Analysis for Public Transport: a Discrete‐Continuous Modeling Approach Using Panel Data

    Fare Policy Analysis for Public Transport: a Discrete‐Continuous Modeling Approach Using Panel Data

    Fare Policy Analysis for Public Transport: A Discrete‐Continuous Modeling Approach Using Panel Data by Hazem Marwan Zureiqat B.A. in Economics Macalester College, 2006 Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Transportation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2008 © 2008 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved Signature of Author ………………………………………………………………………… Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering May 16, 2008 Certified by ……………………………………………………………………...................... Nigel H. M. Wilson Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering Director, Master of Science in Transportation Program Thesis Supervisor Accepted by …………………………………………………………………………………. Daniele Veneziano Chairman, Departmental Committee for Graduate Students 2 Fare Policy Analysis for Public Transport: A Discrete‐Continuous Modeling Approach Using Panel Data by Hazem Marwan Zureiqat Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering on May 16, 2008, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Transportation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Abstract In many large metropolitan areas, public transport is very heavily used, and ridership is approaching system capacity in the peak periods. This has caused a shift in attention by agency decision‐makers to strategies that can more effectively manage the demand for public transport, rather than simply increase overall demand. In other words, a need has arisen to understand not only why people use public transport as opposed to other modes but also how they use public transport, in terms of their ticket, mode, and time‐of‐day choices. To that end, fares become an increasingly important policy tool that can trigger certain behavioral changes among riders.
  • Passenger and Vehicle Fare Information Surcharges Seattle/Bainbridge, Seattle/Bremerton, Edmonds/Kingston Fauntleroy/Vashon

    Passenger and Vehicle Fare Information Surcharges Seattle/Bainbridge, Seattle/Bremerton, Edmonds/Kingston Fauntleroy/Vashon

    19-08-0392 Printed in the USA on recycled/recyclable paper. recycled/recyclable on USA the in Printed Seattle/Bainbridge, Seattle/Bremerton, Fauntleroy/Vashon, Point Defiance/Tahlequah, Americans with Disabilities Edmonds/Kingston Southworth/Vashon Mukilteo/Clinton Act (ADA) and Title VI Notice Seattle, Washington 98121-3014 Washington Seattle, 2901 Third Avenue Suite 500 Suite Avenue Third 2901 Passenger Regular Fare 8.65 Passenger Regular Fare 5.65 Passenger Regular Fare 5.20 It is the Washington State Department of Washington State Ferries State Washington In vehicle or walk on Senior/Disability/Medicare Card Fare 4.30 In vehicle or walk on Senior/Disability/Medicare Card Fare 2.80 In vehicle or walk on Senior/Disability/Medicare Card Fare 2.60 Transportation’s policy to ensure that no Youth Fare 4.30 Youth Fare 2.80 Youth Fare 2.60 person shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin, or sex, as provided by Title VI Wave2Go Multi-Ride Card 69.70 Wave2Go Multi-Ride Card 45.70 Wave2Go Multi-Ride Card 42.10 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, or based on Monthly Ferry Pass 111.55 Monthly Ferry Pass 73.15 Monthly Ferry Pass 67.40 disability as provided by the Americans with Bicycle Surcharge Passenger Fare Plus 1.00 Bicycle Surcharge Passenger Fare Plus 1.00 Bicycle Surcharge Passenger Fare Plus 1.00 Disabilities Act, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise Small Vehicle & Driver Regular Fare 12.35 Peak Season 16.00 Small Vehicle & Driver Regular Fare 15.75 Peak Season 20.40 Small Vehicle & Driver Regular Fare 7.40 Peak Season 9.70 discriminated against under any of its federally @WSFerries funded programs and activities.
  • Matching the Speed of Technology with the Speed of Local Government: Developing Codes and Policies Related to the Possible Impacts of New Mobility on Cities

    Matching the Speed of Technology with the Speed of Local Government: Developing Codes and Policies Related to the Possible Impacts of New Mobility on Cities

    Final Report 1216 June 2020 Photo by Cait McCusker Matching the Speed of Technology with the Speed of Local Government: Developing Codes and Policies Related to the Possible Impacts of New Mobility on Cities Marc Schlossberg, Ph.D. Heather Brinton NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNITIES nitc-utc.net MATCHING THE SPEED OF TECHNOLOGY WITH THE SPEED OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT Developing Codes and Policies Related to the Possible Impacts of New Mobility on Cities Final Report NITC-RR-1216 by Marc Schlossberg, Professor Department of Planning, Public Policy and Management University of Oregon Heather Brinton, Director Environment and Natural Resources Law Center University of Oregon for National Institute for Transportation and Communities (NITC) P.O. Box 751 Portland, OR 97207 June 2020 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. NITC-RR-1216 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date June 2020 Matching the Speed of Technology with the Speed of Local Government: Developing Codes and Policies Related to the Possible Impacts of New Mobility on Cities 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Marc Schlossberg Report No. Heather Brinton 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) University of Oregon 1209 University of Oregon 11. Contract or Grant No. Eugene, OR 97403 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered National Institute for Transportation and Communities (NITC) P.O. Box 751 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Portland, Oregon 97207 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract Advances in transportation technology such as the advent of scooter and bikeshare systems (micromobility), ridehailing, and autonomous vehicles (AV’s) are beginning to have profound effects not only on how we live, move, and spend our time in cities, but also on urban form and development itself.
  • Full Free Fare Public Transport: Objectives and Alternatives September | 2020

    Full Free Fare Public Transport: Objectives and Alternatives September | 2020

    POLICY BRIEF FULL FREE FARE PUBLIC TRANSPORT: OBJECTIVES AND ALTERNATIVES SEPTEMBER | 2020 INTRODUCTION At a time when cities must prepare for and face serious services and infrastructure must remain the overarching environmental and societal challenges, sustainable principle throughout these discussions. It is therefore urban mobility has never been this high up on the crucial to carefully consider the stated objectives which agenda. With the transversal role that public transport this measure is meant to achieve as well as its impacts, in plays in terms of urban quality of life, increasing and order to decide whether or not it is the most appropriate facilitating its access is a major challenge. Following use of public funds. In doing so, one must keep in mind this line of thought, the concept of free fare public that free public transport as such does not exist, as transport (FFPT) has been gaining traction in the public transport service and infrastructure has to be funded discourse, as several large cities have been considering one way or another. Hence the reference to free fare this possibility. public transport means that public transport users do not contribute to funding the service directly through While free public transport is often brought up in the payment of a fare. political discussions, its implementation has very concrete implications on the organisation of public Drawing from the experience of FFPT cities, this Policy transport. Yet, the strengthening of public transport Brief provides an analysis of the various stated objectives and the extent to which FFPT is the right tool to achieve them.
  • The Effect of Fare Reductions on Public Transit Ridership

    The Effect of Fare Reductions on Public Transit Ridership

    iL THE EFFECT OF FARE REDUCTIONS ON PUBLIC TRANSIT RIDERSHIP John R. Caruolo Roger P. Roess May 1974 PROJECT" REPORT This document was produced as part of a program of Research and Training in Urban Transportation sponsored by UMTA, USDOT. The results and views expressed are the independent products of university research and not necessarily concurred in by UMTA. Prepared for DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND EDUCATION DIVISION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20 590 1 Of Transportation we Dept. If 3*/ / 0*6 1 MIR a 1976 , I — Library Report No. UMTA-74-6-1 THE EFFECT OF FARE REDUCTIONS ON PUBLIC TRANSIT RIDERSHIP, John R. Caruolo Roger P. Roess - . May 1974 PROJECT REPORT This document was produced as part of a program of Research and Training in Urban Transportation sponsored by UMTA, USDOT. The results and views expressed are the independent products of university research and not necessarily concurred in by UMTA. Prepared for DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND EDUCATION DIVISION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20 590 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. T*cknicol Report Documentation Page 1. Report Ho. 2. Covtmoml Accrttion No. 3. Rrcipitnt * Cotoloq No. I UMTA-74-6- 1 4. Till* Subtitle 5. Report Do»o The Effect of Fare Reductions on Public May 1974 Transit Ridership 4. Performing Orgont ration Code 8. Performing Organization Report Mo j . Caruol'o, and Roger P.