Serotonergic Innervation of the Auditory Brainstem of the Mexican Free-Tailed Bat, Tadarida Brasiliensis
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
THE JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY 435:78–88 (2001) Serotonergic Innervation of the Auditory Brainstem of the Mexican Free-Tailed Bat, Tadarida brasiliensis LAURA M. HURLEY1* AND ANN M. THOMPSON2 1Section of Neurobiology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712 2Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104 ABSTRACT Anatomical and electrophysiological evidence suggests that serotonin alters the process- ing of sound in the auditory brainstem of many mammalian species. The Mexican free-tailed bat is a hearing specialist, like other microchiropteran bats. At the same time, many aspects of its auditory brainstem are similar to those in other mammals. This dichotomy raises an interesting question regarding the serotonergic innervation of the bat auditory brainstem: Is the serotonergic input to the auditory brainstem similar in bats and other mammals, or are there specializations in the serotonergic innervation of bats that may be related to their exceptional hearing capabilities? To address this question, we immunocytochemically labeled serotonergic fibers in the brainstem of the Mexican free-tailed bat, Tadarida brasiliensis.We found many similarities in the pattern of serotonergic innervation of the auditory brainstem in Tadarida compared with other mammals, but we also found two striking differences. Similarities to staining patterns in other mammals included a higher density of serotonergic fibers in the dorsal cochlear nucleus and in granule cell regions than in the ventral cochlear nucleus, a high density of fibers in some periolivary nuclei of the superior olive, and a higher density of fibers in peripheral regions of the inferior colliculus compared with its core. The two novel features of serotonergic innervation in Tadarida were a high density of fibers in the fusiform layer of the dorsal cochlear nucleus relative to surrounding layers and a relatively high density of serotonergic fibers in the low-frequency regions of the lateral and medial superior olive. J. Comp. Neurol. 435:78–88, 2001. © 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Indexing terms: cochlear nucleus; superior olivary complex; lateral lemniscus; inferior colliculus Neuromodulators can cause the functional reconfigura- thermore, these serotonergic fibers often show interesting tion of neural circuits in both invertebrates and verte- and nonuniform patterns of staining both between and brates (for examples, see reviews in Harris-Warrick et al., within auditory nuclei, suggesting that the degree of se- 1992; Sillar et al., 1998). In mammals, the neuromodula- rotonergic modulation is greater in some auditory regions tor serotonin can induce plasticity in the central represen- than others. tation of many different sensory modalities, including no- A second line of evidence that serotonin is a neuromodu- ciception, vision, and somatosensation (see, e.g., Rogawski lator in the auditory system is electrophysiological. Sero- and Aghajanian, 1980; Iwayama et al., 1989; Bassant et tonin has been shown to change auditory evoked poten- al., 1990; Waterhouse et al., 1990; Huang et al., 1993; tials from the level of the brainstem to the level of the Storer and Goadsby, 1997; Edagawa et al., 1999). Several cortex (Ehlers et al., 1991; Revelis et al., 1998). In addi- lines of evidence suggest that serotonin modulates the central processing of audition, too. One of these lines of evidence is anatomical number of immunohistochemical studies of serotonin have demonstrated that serotonergic Grant sponsor: National Institutes of Health; Grant numbers: DC00391 fibers are present in every major auditory nucleus of the and DC01058. *Correspondence to: Laura M. Hurley, C0920/140 Patterson Labs, Uni- brainstem (Steinbusch, 1981; Willard et al., 1984; Klepper versity of Texas, Austin, TX 78712. E-mail: [email protected] and Herbert, 1991; Thompson et al., 1994, 1995; Thomp- Received 23 June 2000; Revised 21 November 2000; Accepted 13 March son and Thompson, 1995; Kaiser and Covey, 1997). Fur- 2001 © 2001 WILEY-LISS, INC. 5HT IN FREE-TAILED BAT AUDITORY BRAINSTEM 79 tion, serotonin has been shown to change the firing pat- free-tailed bat. However, there were also two notable fea- terns of single auditory neurons in several brainstem au- tures of serotonin immunohistochemistry in the Mexican ditory nuclei in different mammalian species (Faingold et free-tailed bat that have not been reported previously in al., 1991; Ebert and Ostwald, 1992; Wang and Robertson, other animals. 1997; Fitzgerald and Sanes, 1999; Hurley and Pollak, 1999). In the inferior colliculus (IC) of the Mexican free- tailed bat, Tadarida brasiliensis, serotonin changes the MATERIALS AND METHODS selectivity of individual neurons for different types of sounds (Hurley and Pollak, 1999). Seven bats were used for serotonin immunohistochem- Mexican free-tailed bats, as microchiropteran bats, are istry. Five of these bats were also used in a parallel tract- useful models for the study of brainstem auditory process- tracing study, which is not reported here. These five ani- ing. These mammals have an exquisitely developed sense mals were used within 24–72 hours of tract-tracer of hearing that allows them to locate their insect prey injection. The care and use of the animals followed a through echolocation (Simmons et al., 1978, 1979). The protocol approved by the University of Texas at Austin echolocation signals used by Mexican free-tailed bats are Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. downward frequency-modulated sweeps (Simmons et al., Animals were deeply anesthetized with methoxyflurane 1978, 1979). In addition, they have a wide repertoire of inhalant (Metofane; Schering-Plough, Madison, NJ) and communication calls (Gelfand and McCracken, 1986; Bal- injected intraperitoneally with 0.05–0.1 mL ketamine combe and McCracken, 1992). Reflecting this heavy reli- (Vetamine; Schering-Plough). They were then transcardi- ance on sound, most brainstem auditory nuclei in bats are ally perfused with 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), hypertrophied compared with those of other mammals. At pH 7.2, at 4°C containing 1–2% lidocaine until the blood the same time, however, many aspects of the bat brain- cleared. This was followed by 4% paraformaldehyde in stem auditory system are fundamentally mammalian, PBS for 20 minutes. Brains were postfixed overnight in with most of the same circuitry and response properties the same fixative, then sequentially equilibrated in 10%, that are found in the auditory systems of other mammals 20%, and 30% sucrose in PBS. Brains were sectioned in (Pollak et al., 1977; Bodenhamer et al., 1979; Grothe et al., the transverse plane at 40-m intervals on a sliding mic- 1994, 1997; Park et al., 1996, 1998). Whether the seroto- rotome and collected in 0.1 M PBS. Slices were placed in nergic innervation of the brain of the free-tailed bat re- four parallel treatment groups, so that every fourth slice flects the general mammalian plan or exhibits some spe- received the same treatment. cializations that are unique to bat remains an outstanding Brain slices were rinsed in 0.1 M PBS with 0.3% Triton issue. X-100 (PBSTx; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and then blocked in To address this issue, we immunohistochemically la- 5% normal goat serum (NGS; Sigma) and 0.1% bovine beled serotonin fibers in the brainstem of the Mexican serum albumin (BSA; Sigma). They were then blocked free-tailed bat. There were many similarities between the with avidin alone and biotin alone (avidin/biotin blocking patterns of serotonergic fibers in the brainstem of the kit; Vector Laboratories, Ingold, CA) and incubated in free-tailed bat and previously reported staining patterns primary rabbit antiserotonin antibody (Eugene Tech, in other species. As is the case in other species, there were Ridgefield Park, NJ) at 1:20,000 or 1:10,000 dilution on a striking differences in the densities of serotonergic fibers shaker at 4°C for 1–2 days. After incubation in the pri- both within and between auditory nuclei in the Mexican mary antibody, sections were rinsed in PBSTx and incu- bated for 1 hour at room temperature in biotinylated goat anti-rabbit antibody (Vector Laboratories) diluted 1:400 in 2% NGS for 1 hour at room temperature. Sections were then rinsed in PBS and run through an avidin-biotin Abbreviations reaction (Vectastain peroxidase kit; Vector Laboratories), AN auditory nerve rinsed in phosphate buffer (PB), pH 7.2, and reacted with AVCN anteroventral cochlear nucleus diaminobenzidene dihydrochloride at 0.5 g/mL plus 0.3% AVCNA anterior AVCN hydrogen peroxide in PB. Sections were rinsed and AVCNP posterior AVCN C core (octopus cell region of the posteroventral cochlear nu- mounted on slides coated with 3% gelatin. Some slides cleus) were counterstained with cresyl violet or neutral red to DC dorsal cortex label cell bodies. Controls using preadsorbed primary an- DCN dorsal cochlear nucleus tibody were performed previously (Thompson et al., 1994). DMPO dorsomedial periolivary nucleus DNLL dorsal nucleus of the lateral lemniscus Slides were viewed and photographed in transmitted DPO dorsal periolivary nucleus light optics on a Nikon light microscope (Tokyo, Japan). EC external cortex Subsequent to this, some of the images were enhanced FCL fusiform cell layer with Adobe PhotoShop software (Adobe Systems, Moun- IC inferior colliculus ICc central nucleus of the IC tain View, CA). For some images, the brightness ranges INLL intermediate nucleus of the lateral lemniscus were narrowed to enhance contrast. When these manipu- LNTB lateral nucleus of the trapezoid body lations were performed, they were performed uniformly LSO lateral superior olive across an entire image. Serotonin-positive fibers were MNTB medial nucleus of the trapezoid body ϫ MSO medial superior olive drawn in representative sections under a 100 oil- PVCN posteroventral cochlear nucleus immersion objective with a drawing tube attachment. For VCN ventral cochlear nucleus the figures, individual pages of the original reconstruc- VMPO ventromedial periolivary nucleus tions were reduced in size by a photocopier and taped VNLL ventral nucleus of the lateral lemniscus VNTB ventral nucleus of the trapezoid body together.