DOCSLIB.ORG

1997 State Highway Accident Rate Tables

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1997 State Highway Accident Rate Tables n TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT BRANCH n 1997 STATE HIGHWAY ACCIDENT RATE TABLES Published by Transportation Data Section Accident Data Unit August 1998 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION T A B L E OF C O N T E N T S Part Page Introduction......................................................................................................................3 Results of Analysis...............................................................................................I 5 Facts of Interest...................................................................................................I 6 Table I - Comparison of Motor Vehicle Death Rates.............................................I 7 Table II - 1993-1997 Traffic Accident Rates..........................................................I 8 Table III - Comparison of 1996-1997 Accident Rate Data.....................................I 9 Table IV - Comparative Accident Rates by Jurisdiction.........................................I 10 Highway Numbers, Names and Routes.................................................................I 11 Map - State Highway System................................................................................I 15 Map - Portland System Enlargement...................................................................I 15 Accident Rate Data by Section.............................................................................II 17 Summary of Fatal Traffic Accidents, State of Oregon...........................................III 245 Appendix A: Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations..........................................................251 Page 3 I N T R O D U C T I O N The three parts of this report are: I Results of Analysis containing comparative tables and the Signed Route on Highway list, II Five year accident rate data by highway sections, III A summary of this year's fatal traffic accidents. The first two parts provide data that show crash frequencies in relation to traffic volume and lineal length. Any comparison of accident data, either by count or formula, must recognize the vehicle-miles involved. Failure to evaluate the data in this manner could lead to errors. Part I compares the Oregon to the nationwide traffic death rate. Traveled mileage death rates and population death rates are shown as well as, comparative rates by design types. Freeway, and non-freeway data are presented by urban, suburban and rural subgroups. Part II presents five year accident experience for each highway. Each state highway is divided into urban and rural sections which are further subdivided for analysis. The start milepost, length, number of accidents, average daily traffic, current accident rate, as well as the accident rate for the previous four years is shown for each sub section. Each section and highway is summarized. Part III is a summary of this year's fatal accidents in Oregon. Since 1941, the records of all Oregon motor vehicle traffic accidents have been summarized by the Department of Transportation. This accident data has been made available to the public as well as government agencies. Since 1948, the Department has published traffic accident data. Current accident coding is guided by the "Manual on Classification of Motor Vehicle Traffic Accidents, 1989", published by the National Safety Council. In Oregon, the law requires that any traffic accident on a public roadway which resulted in bodily injury be reported. Accidents in which no person was injured and met the property damage threshold were also required to be reported. In 1997, from January 1 to October 3, the property damage threshold was $500. Since October 4, 1997 the threshold is $1,000. Page 4 -- This page is intentionally left blank Page 5 PART 1 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS Page 6 FACTS OF INTEREST The State Highway System accounted for 19,376,530,561 vehicle-miles of travel during 1997. This was an increase of 3.01 percent from the 1996 total of 18,809,289,873.. The State Highway System had 263 fatal accidents during 1997. This represented a decrease of 2.95 percent from the 271 fatal accidents reported in 1996. The total number of persons killed in 1997 was 305, a decrease of 3.5 percent from the 1996 total of 316. The 1997 accident rate per million vehicle-miles for non-freeway highway was 1.70. This was four and one fourth more times the total freeway accident rate of 0.40 for the same period. This difference between non-freeway and freeway accident rates indicates the greater safety of travel on freeways. An estimated 42,000 traffic deaths for the nation is a slight decrease from the 1996 final figure of 42,065. Oregon, with a total of 520 killed in 1997, shows a decrease from the 522 fatalities in 1996. Page 7 COMPARISON OF MOTOR VEHICLE DEATH RATES 1967 - 1997 Table I portrays annual motor vehicle traffic death rates on mileage and population bases from 1967 to 1997. The figures shown are national Safety Council estimates, based on data from state traffic authorities, national Office of Vital Statistics, and the Federal Highway Administration. TABLE I Traveled-Mileage Death Rates1 Population Death Rates2 YEAR Oregon United States Oregon United States 1997 1.6 1.7 16.3 15.7 1996 1.7 1.7 16.4 15.8 1995 1.9 1.7 18.2 15.8 1994 1.6 1.7 12.8 15.6 1993 1.7 1.7 17.2 15.5 1992 1.6 1.7 15.8 15.4 1991 1.9 1.9 16.5 16.9 1990 2.1 2.1 20.3 18.7 1989 2.4 2.2 23.0 18.9 1988 2.7 2.3 24.4 19.9 1987 2.6 2.4 22.9 20.1 1986 2.7 2.5 23.2 19.8 1985 2.6 2.5 21.0 19.1 1984 2.7 2.6 21.4 19.4 1983 2.7 2.6 20.8 19.0 1982 2.7 3.8 19.5 20.0 1981 3.3 3.2 24.2 22.1 1980 3.3 3.3 24.4 23.5 1979 3.4 3.3 26.5 23.5 1978 3.6 3.3 29.1 23.5 1977 3.7 3.3 28.1 22.7 1976 3.7 3.2 27.2 21.9 1975 3.6 3.4 24.9 21.4 1974 4.4 3.5 29.7 21.9 1973 4.0 4.1 28.5 26.5 1972 4.8 4.3 33.5 27.0 1971 4.8 4.5 31.7 26.7 1970 5.1 4.7 32.9 27.1 1969 5.6 5.0 34.2 27.9 1968 5.4 5.2 31.6 27.8 1967 5.7 5.3 32.8 26.8 1 Number of deaths per 100,000 vehicle miles. 2 Number of deaths per 100,000 population. Page 8 ACCIDENTS ON STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM Table II shows the comparative five-year accident experience for freeways and non-freeways on the State Highway System, primary and secondary components, and the respective rural and urban portions. Total lengths for the categories are shown for the new year only. TABLE II ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE-MILES 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 Description Miles Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate TOTAL State Highway Stystem 7,493.00 1.11 1.23 1.13 1.12 1.19 Freeways 759.15 0.40 0.58 0.31 0.53 0.59 Non-Freeways 6,733.85 1.70 1.76 1.82 1.62 1.69 Primary System 4,959.93 1.04 1.15 1.07 1.06 1.12 Freeways 743.09 0.39 0.55 0.30 0.50 0.56 Non-Freeways 4,216.84 1.72 1.76 1.86 1.64 1.71 Seconday System 2,533.07 1.47 1.66 1.51 1.50 1.59 Freeways 16.06 0.67 1.20 0.56 1.22 1.29 Non-Freeways 2,517.01 1.62 1.75 1.68 1.54 1.64 RURAL State Highway System 6,783.33 0.61 0.70 0.60 0.63 0.67 Freeways 632.10 0.23 0.32 0.14 0.28 0.31 Non-Freeways 6,151.23 0.91 0.98 0.94 0.88 0.93 Primary System 4,442.40 0.53 0.61 0.52 0.54 0.59 Freeways 630.31 0.23 0.31 0.14 0.27 0.30 Non-Freeways 3,812.09 0.83 0.89 0.89 0.81 0.87 Secondary System 2,340.93 1.11 1.26 1.08 1.10 1.14 Freeways 1.79 0.16 1.13 0.28 1.16 0.85 Non-Freeways 2,339.14 1.14 1.26 1.11 1.10 1.15 URBAN State Highway System 709.67 2.09 2.25 2.19 2.13 2.25 Freeways 127.05 0.70 1.01 0.59 0.96 1.07 Non-Freeways 582.62 3.52 3.53 2.84 3.32 3.43 Primary System 517.53 2.07 2.23 2.16 2.11 2.21 Freeways 112.78 0.69 0.99 0.58 0.93 1.04 Non-Freeways 404.75 3.67 3.63 3.98 3.45 3.55 Secondary System 192.14 2.14 2.39 2.31 2.25 2.42 Freeways 14.27 0.76 1.22 0.61 1.23 1.37 Non-Freeways 177.87 2.93 3.10 3.27 2.79 2.99 RURAL includes both the Rural and Suburban shown in Table IV. Page 9 COMPARISON OF ACCIDENT RATE DATA 1996 to 1997 The calculation of accident rates involves three basic elements: (1) Number of accidents, (2) Length of section (in Miles), and (3) Annual traffic volume Table lll RELATION OF BASIC DATA FOR THE YEARS 1996-1997 No of Section Annual Vehicle Accidents Rate Per Description Accidents Length Miles Per Mile Million Miles STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM Freeways 1996 4,964 759.18 8,530,151,184 6.54 0.58 1997 3,556 759.15 8,831,553,282 4.68 0.40 Percent -28.36% 0.00% 3.53% -28.36% -30.81% Non- Freeways 1996 18,089 6,733.87 10,279,138,689 2.69 1.76 1997 17,887 6,733.85 10,544,977,279 2.66 1.70 Percent -1.12% 0.00% 2.59% -1.12% -3.61% PRIMARY HIGHWAYS Freeways 1996 4,435 743.12 8,090,207,106 5.97 0.55 1997 3,271 743.09 8,408,139,960 4.40 0.39 Percent -26.25% 0.00% 3.93% -26.24% -29.03% Non- Freeways 1996 14,014 4,216.86 7,946,339,266 3.32 1.76 1997 14,003 4,216.84 8,141,698,390 3.32 1.72 Percent -0.08% 0.00% 2.46% -0.08% -2.48% SECONDARY HIGHWAYS Freeways 1996 529 16.06 439,944,078 32.94 1.20 1997 285 16.06 423,413,322 17.75 0.67 Percent -46.12% 0.00% -3.76% -46.12% -44.02% Non- Freeways 1996 4,075 2,517.01 2,332,799,423 1.62 1.75 1997 3,884 2,517.01 2,403,278,889 1.54 1.62 Percent -4.69% 0.00% 3.02% -4.69% -7.48% Page 10 COMPARATIVE ACCIDENT RATES BY JURISDICTION 1997 The importance of rate comparisons in relation to components of the State Highway System is shown by the rates in Table IV.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • JORDAN This Publication Has Been Produced with the Financial Assistance of the European Union Under the ENI CBC Mediterranean
    ATTRACTIONS, INVENTORY AND MAPPING FOR ADVENTURE TOURISM JORDAN This publication has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union under the ENI CBC Mediterranean Sea Basin Programme. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the Official Chamber of Commerce, Industry, Services and Navigation of Barcelona and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union or the Programme management structures. The European Union is made up of 28 Member States who have decided to gradually link together their know-how, resources and destinies. Together, during a period of enlargement of 50 years, they have built a zone of stability, democracy and sustainable development whilst maintaining cultural diversity, tolerance and individual freedoms. The European Union is committed to sharing its achievements and its values with countries and peoples beyond its borders. The 2014-2020 ENI CBC Mediterranean Sea Basin Programme is a multilateral Cross-Border Cooperation (CBC) initiative funded by the European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI). The Programme objective is to foster fair, equitable and sustainable economic, social and territorial development, which may advance cross-border integration and valorise participating countries’ territories and values. The following 13 countries participate in the Programme: Cyprus, Egypt, France, Greece, Israel, Italy, Jordan, Lebanon, Malta, Palestine, Portugal, Spain, Tunisia. The Managing Authority (JMA) is the Autonomous Region of Sardinia (Italy). Official Programme languages are Arabic, English and French. For more information, please visit: www.enicbcmed.eu MEDUSA project has a budget of 3.3 million euros, being 2.9 million euros the European Union contribution (90%).
    [Show full text]
  • Bighorn Sheep and Mountain Goat Hunting Seasons
    CHAPTER 9 BIGHORN SHEEP AND MOUNTAIN GOAT HUNTING SEASONS Section 1. Authority. This regulation is promulgated by authority of Wyoming Statutes § 23-1-302, § 23-1-703, § 23-2-104 and § 23-3-117. Section 2. Definitions. In addition to the definitions set forth in Title 23 of the Wyoming Statutes and Chapter 2, General Hunting Regulation, the Commission also adopts the following definitions for the purpose of this chapter; (a) “Bighorn sheep horns” mean the hollow horn sheaths of male bighorn sheep, either attached to the skull or separated. (b) “Plugging” means placement of a permanent metal plug provided and attached by the Department. Section 3. Bighorn Sheep Hunting Seasons. Hunt areas, season dates and limitations. Special Regular Hunt Archery Dates Season Dates Area Type Opens Closes Opens Closes Quota Limitations 1 1 Aug. 15 Aug. 31 Sep. 1 Oct. 31 12 Any ram 2 1 Aug. 15 Aug. 31 Sep. 1 Oct. 31 20 Any ram 3 1 Aug. 15 Aug. 31 Sep. 1 Oct. 31 32 Any ram 4 1 Aug. 15 Aug. 31 Sep. 1 Oct. 31 24 Any ram 5 1 Aug. 1 Aug. 31 32 Any sheep valid within the Owl Creek Drainage 5 1 Aug. 15 Aug. 31 Sep. 1 Oct. 31 Any ram valid in the entire area 6 1 Aug. 1 Aug. 14 Aug. 15 Oct. 31 1 Any ram (1 resident) 7 1 Aug. 15 Aug. 31 Sep. 1 Oct. 31 12 Any bighorn sheep 8 1 Aug. 15 Aug. 31 Sep. 1 Oct. 31 7 Any ram (5 residents, 2 nonresidents) 9 1 Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 State Highway Crash Rate Tables
    TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION 2012 STATE HIGHWAY CRASH RATE TABLES Published by Transportation Data Section Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit November 2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2012 OREGON STATE HIGHWAY CRASH RATE TABLES Oregon Department of Transportation Transportation Development Division Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit 555 13th Street NE, Suite 2 Salem, OR 97301-4178 Robin Ness Manager November 2013 The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit collects data and publishes statistics for reported motor vehicle traffic crashes per ORS 802.050(2) and 802.220(6). The data supports various local, county, and state traffic safety programs; engineering and planning projects; legislative concepts; and law enforcement services. Legally reportable motor vehicle traffic crashes are those involving death, bodily injury, or damage to personal property in excess of $500 (for crashes that occurred prior to 9/01/1997) or $1,000 (for crashes that occurred between 9/01/1997 and 12/31/2003). As of January 1, 2004, drivers are required to file an Accident and Insurance Report Form with DMV within 72 hours when: if injury or death resulted from the accident; damage to the driver's vehicle is over $1,500; damage to any vehicle is over $1,500 and any vehicle is towed from the scene as a result of said damage; or damage to any one person’s property, other than a vehicle involved in the accident, is over $1,500. For more information on filing requirements, please contact DMV. The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit cannot guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented; nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate.
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma Statutes Title 69. Roads, Bridges, and Ferries
    OKLAHOMA STATUTES TITLE 69. ROADS, BRIDGES, AND FERRIES §69-101. Declaration of legislative intent.............................................................................................19 §69-113a. Successful bidders - Return of executed contract................................................................20 §69-201. Definitions of words and phrases..........................................................................................21 §69-202. Abandonment........................................................................................................................21 §69-203. Acquisition or taking..............................................................................................................21 §69-204. Arterial highway.....................................................................................................................21 §69-205. Authority................................................................................................................................21 §69-206. Auxiliary service highway.......................................................................................................21 §69-207. Board......................................................................................................................................21 §69-208. Bureau of Public Roads..........................................................................................................21 §69-209. Commission............................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Al-Rajef 82 Mw Wind Power Project Environmental and Social Impact
    AL-RAJEF 82 MW WIND POWER PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESIA) 23 April 2016 REV - 3 Al-Rajef Wind Power Project – Final ESIA Document title Al-Rajef 82 MW Wind Power Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Status REV- 3 Date 23 April 2016 Client Green Watts Renewable Energy (GWRE) Co. L.L.C REVISION RECORD Rev. Created By Internal Review By Date Submission Reviewed Date No. Status By Rev 0 ECO Consult ECO Consult 13 July 2015 Draft GWRE 15 July 2015 Rev 1 ECO Consult ECO Consult 6 Oct 2015 Draft Rev 2 ECO Consult ECO Consult 9 Nov 2015 Final Rev 3 ECO Consult ECO Consult 23 Apr 2016 Final PAGE | II Al-Rajef Wind Power Project – Final ESIA CONTACTS ECO Consult Physical Address: ECO Consult Jude Centre, 4th floor, Building #1 Salem Hindawi Street Shmeisani Amman Jordan Mailing Address: ECO Consult PO Box 941400 Amman 11194 Jordan Tel: +962 6 569 9769 Fax: + 962 6 569 7264 Email: [email protected] Contact Persons: Ra’ed Daoud Managing Director - ECO Consult E: [email protected] Lana Zu’bi Project Manager – ECO Consult E: lana.zu'[email protected] Ibrahim Masri Project Coordinator – ECO Consult E: [email protected] PAGE | III Al-Rajef Wind Power Project – Final ESIA TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................. iv List of Figures .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Finance, Training, Strategic Management, and Economic Analysis
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD No. 1498 Planning and Administration Transportation Finance, Training, Strategic Management, and Economic Analysis A peer-reviewed publication of the Transportation Research Board TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS WASHINGTON, D.C. 1995 Transportation Research Record 1498 Edward A. Beimborn, Richard K. Brail, Michael S. Bronzini, Katherine L. ISSN 0361-1981 Davis, Roger L. Dean, Marvin C. Gersten, Edwin W. Hauser, Frederick ISBN 0-309-06162-8 Hugo, Joyce H. Johnson, Elaine E. Joost, C. Jotin Khisty, Patricia L. Lees, Price: $27 .00 John M. McCullough, Charles T. Morison, Jr., Neville A. Parker, Calvin Roberts, John Ross, Kwnares C. Sinha, Louis B. Stephens, Jr., C. Michael Subscriber Category Walton, Eugene M. Wilson IA planning and administration Committee on Transportation and Economic Development Printed in the United States of America Chairman: David J. Forkenbrock, University of Iowa Michael Bell, Fredric S. Berger, Stewart E. Butler, Gary DeCramer, Randall W. Eberts, Norman S. J. Foster, James S. Gillespie, Terry L. Gotts, John F. Hornbeck, Andrew M. Isserman, Hal S. Maggied, Sharon B. Megdal, Deb L. Miller, Susan Jones Moses, Bahar B. Sponsorship of Transportation Research Record 1498 Norris. Robert D. Owens, Elizabeth A. Pinkston, Wayne B. Placide, Farideh Ramjerdi, Kenneth D. Simonson, Theresa M. Smith, GROUP I-TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS PLANNING AND Robert J. Zuelsdoif ADMINISTRATION Chairman: Thomas F. Humphrey, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Committee on Strategic Management Chairman: George T. Lathrop, Charlotte Department of Transportation Management and Administration Section Secretary: Sidney Davis, Southern College of Technology Chairwoman: Julie Hoover, Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. Kenneth Asp, Linda Bohlinger, Mark Ford, John Glover, Mark P.
    [Show full text]
  • Post® Honey Brunches of Oats® Chicken & Waffles and Maple Bacon Donuts Cereal Locations Walmart Locations
    Post® Honey Brunches of Oats® Chicken & Waffles and Maple Bacon Donuts cereal locations Available at select Walmart, Giant Eagle, Woodman’s and Riesbeck’s locations. Walmart locations ............................................................................................................... Page 1 Giant Eagle locations ....................................................................................................... Page 48 Walmart locations Address City State 537 Johansen Expy Fairbanks AK 3101 A St Anchorage AK 8900 Old Seward Hwy Anchorage AK 1350 S Seward Meridian Pkwy Wasilla AK 18600 Eagle River Rd Eagle River AK 4230 Don King Rd Ketchikan AK 2911 Mill Bay Rd Kodiak AK 7405 Debarr Road Anchorage AK 1801 Highway 78 E Jasper AL 1625 Pelham Rd S Jacksonville AL 340 E Meighan Blvd Gadsden AL 1450 N Brindlee Mount Arab AL 973 Gilbert Ferry Rd Attalla AL 5560 McClellan Blvd Anniston AL 6140a University Drive Huntsville AL 2900 Pepperell Pkwy Opelika AL 1717 S College St Auburn AL 13675 Highway 43 Russellville AL 11610 Memorial Pkwy Huntsville AL 1903 Cobbs Ford Rd Prattville AL 4310 Montgomery Hwy Dothan AL 517 Avalon Ave Muscle Shoals AL 1011 Us Highway 72 E Athens AL 2800 Spring Ave SW Decatur AL 626 Olive St SW Cullman AL 11697 Us Highway 431 Guntersville AL 2001 Glenn Blvd SW Fort Payne AL 1501 Al Highway 14 E Selma AL 1 24833 John T Reid Pk Scottsboro AL 1501 Skyland Blvd E Tuscaloosa AL 1420 Highway 231 S Troy AL 2643 Highway 280 Alexander City AL 41301 Us Highway 280 Sylacauga AL 600 Boll Weevil Cir Enterprise AL 1537 S Us Highway 23 Ozark AL 750 Academy Dr Bessemer AL 3100 Hough Rd Florence AL 92 Plaza Ln Oxford AL 685 Schillinger Rd S Mobile AL 27520 Us Highway 98 Daphne AL 6495 Atlanta Hwy Montgomery AL 101 E I65 Service Rd Mobile AL 4538 Us Highway 231 Wetumpka AL 890 Odum Rd Gardendale AL 1095 Industrial Pkwy Saraland AL 2780 John Hawkins Pk Hoover AL 3700 Hwy 280/431 N.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of County Commissioners Carver County, Minnesota
    Carver County Board of Commissioners February 19, 2019 Regular Session County Board Room Carver County Government Center Human Services Building Chaska, Minnesota PAGE REGULAR SESSION 4:00 p.m. 1. a) CONVENE b) Pledge of allegiance c) Public comments - Anyone wishing to address the Board of Commissioners on an item not on the agenda may come forward at this time. Please limit your comments to five minutes. 2. Agenda review and adoption 3. Approve minutes of February 5, 2018, Regular Session ................................... 1-5 4. Community Announcements 4:05 p.m. 5. CONSENT AGENDA Growth: Manage the challenges and opportunities resulting from growth and development 5.1 Request for approval of PSA contract with Bolton and Menk for Arboretum Area Transportation Plan .......................................................... 6 5.2 Joint Powers Agreement with City of Chanhassen for the Arboretum Area Transportation Plan ..................................................................................... 7 5.3 Joint Powers Agreement with City of Chaska for the Arboretum Area Transportation Plan ..................................................................................... 8 5.4 Joint Powers Agreement with City of Victoria for the Arboretum Area Transportation Plan ..................................................................................... 9 5.5 Request for approval to contract with Ayres Associates .......................... 10 5.6 Request for Approval of PSA with SRF for Highway 212 INFRA Grant Application ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Context and Methodology for Evaluating Trails, Roads, and Highways in California
    A Historical Context and Methodology for Evaluating Trails, Roads, and Highways in California Prepared by The California Department of Transportation Sacramento, California ® ® © 2016 California Department of Transportation. All Rights Reserved. Cover photography provided Caltrans Headquarters Library. Healdsburg Wheelmen photograph courtesy of the Healdsburg Museum. For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats upon request. Please call: (916) 653-0647 Voice, or use the CA Relay Service TTY number 1-800-735-2929 Or write: Chief, Cultural Studies Office Caltrans, Division of Environmental Analysis P.O. Box 942874, MS 27 Sacramento, CA 94274-0001 A HISTORICAL CONTEXT AND METHODOLOGY FOR EVALUATING TRAILS, ROADS, AND HIGHWAYS IN CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Cultural Studies Office Division of Environmental Analysis California Department of Transportation Sacramento 2016 © 2016 California Department of Transportation. All Rights Reserved. OTHER THEMATIC STUDIES BY CALTRANS Water Conveyance Systems in California, Historic Context Development and Evaluation Procedures (2000) A Historical Context and Archaeological Research Design for Agricultural Properties in California (2007) A Historical Context and Archaeological Research Design for Mining Properties in California (2008) A Historical Context and Archeological Research Design for Townsite Properties in California (2010) Tract Housing In California, 1945–1973: A Context for National Register Evaluation (2013) A Historical Context and Archaeological Research Design for Work Camp Properties in California (2013) MANAGEMENT SUMMARY The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) prepared this study in response to the need for a cohesive and comprehensive examination of trails, roads, and highways in California, and with a methodological approach for evaluating these types of properties for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP).
    [Show full text]
  • Global Factory List As of August 3Rd, 2020
    Global Factory List as of August 3rd, 2020 Target is committed to providing increased supply chain transparency. To meet this objective, Target publishes a list of all tier one factories that produce our owned-brand products, national brand products where Target is the importer of record, as well as tier two apparel textile mills and wet processing facilities. Target partners with its vendors and suppliers to maintain an accurate factory list. The list below represents factories as of August 3rd, 2020. This list is subject to change and updates will be provided on a quarterly basis. Factory Name State/Province City Address AMERICAN SAMOA American Samoa Plant Pago Pago 368 Route 1,Tutuila Island ARGENTINA Angel Estrada Cla. S.A, Buenos Aires Ciudad de Buenos Aires Ruta Nacional N 38 Km. 1,155,Provincia de La Rioja AUSTRIA Tiroler Glashuette GmbH Werk: Schneegattern Oberosterreich Lengau Kobernauserwaldstrase 25, BAHRAIN WestPoint Home Bahrain W.L.L. Al Manamah (Al Asimah) Riffa Building #1912, Road # 5146, Block 951,South Alba Industrial Area, Askar BANGLADESH Campex (BD) Limited Chittagong zila Chattogram Building-FS SFB#06, Sector#01, Road#02, Chittagong Export Processing Zone,, Canvas Garments (Pvt.) Ltd Chittagong zila Chattogram 301, North Baizid Bostami Road,,Nasirabad I/A, Canvas Building Chittagong Asian Apparels Chittagong zila Chattogram 132 Nasirabad Indstrial Area,Chattogram Clifton Cotton Mills Ltd Chittagong zila Chattogram CDA plot no-D28,28-d/2 Char Ragmatia Kalurghat, Clifton Textile Chittagong zila Chattogram 180 Nasirabad Industrial Area,Baizid Bostami Road Fashion Watch Limited Chittagong zila Chattogram 1363/A 1364 Askarabad, D.T. Road,Doublemoring, Chattogram, Bangladesh Fortune Apparels Ltd Chittagong zila Chattogram 135/142 Nasirabad Industrial Area,Chattogram KDS Garment Industries Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • View Draft Regulation
    Chapter 9, Bighorn Sheep and Mountain Goat Hunting Seasons At the time of this filing, the 2020 bighorn sheep and mountain goat harvest information is not yet available to the Department. Individual hunt area regular hunting season dates, special archery hunting season dates, hunt area limitations, license types and license quotas may be modified after harvest data has been evaluated. Any additional proposed changes to regular hunting season dates, special archery hunting season dates, hunt area limitations, numbers of limited quota licenses, license types, hunt area boundaries or modifications to other hunting provisions shall be made available for public comment on the Department website. An updated draft of 2021 bighorn sheep and mountain goat hunting season proposals will also be posted to the Department website during the later portion of the public comment period. Please scroll down to view the regulation or click the down arrow for the next page. Draft 12-10-2020.1 CHAPTER 9 BIGHORN SHEEP AND MOUNTAIN GOAT HUNTING SEASONS Section 1. Authority. This regulation is promulgated by authority of Wyoming Statutes § 23-1-302, § 23-1-703, § 23-2-104 and § 23-3-117. Section 2. Definitions. In addition to the definitions set forth in Title 23 of the Wyoming Statutes and Chapter 2, General Hunting Regulation, the Commission also adopts the following definitions for the purpose of this chapter; (a) “Bighorn sheep horns” mean the hollow horn sheaths of male bighorn sheep, either attached to the skull or separated. (b) “Plugging” means placement of a permanent metal plug provided and attached by the Department.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Roads Everywhere: a History of Road Building in Arizona
    GOODGGOODGOOOODD ROADSRROADSROOAADDSS EVERYWHERE:EEVERYWHERE:EVVEERRYYWWHHEERREE:: A HistoryHistory ofof RoadRoad BuildingBuilding inin ArizonaArizona prepared for prepared for Arizona Department of Transportation Environmental Planning Group May 2003 Cover Photograph U.S. Highway 66 at Gold Road, circa 1930s Norman Wallace, Photographer (Courtesy of Arizona Department of Transportation) GOOD ROADS EVERYWHERE: A HISTORY OF ROAD BUILDING IN ARIZONA prepared for Arizona Department of Transportation Environmental Planning Section 205 South 17th Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Project Number STP-900-0(101) TRACS #999 SW 000 H3889 01D Contract Number 97-02 URS Job 23442405 prepared by Melissa Keane J. Simon Bruder contributions by Kenneth M. Euge Geological Consultants, Inc. 2333 West Northern Avenue, Suite 1A Phoenix, Arizona 85021 revisions by A.E. (Gene) Rogge URS Corporation 7720 N. 16th Street, Suite 100 Phoenix, Arizona 85020 URS Cultural Resource Report 2003-28(AZ) March 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ...................................................................................................................................... iv List of Figures..................................................................................................................................... iv List of Pocket Maps............................................................................................................................ v Foreword (by Owen Lindauer and William S. Collins)....................................................................
    [Show full text]