2007 Federal Register, 72 FR 14866

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2007 Federal Register, 72 FR 14866 Thursday, March 29, 2007 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Grizzly Bears; Yellowstone Distinct Population; Notice of Petition Finding; Final Rule VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:50 Mar 28, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\29MRR2.SGM 29MRR2 rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES 14866 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 60 / Thursday, March 29, 2007 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR under the Act and to designate critical Parks will manage habitat in accordance habitat. We find that the petition and with those habitat standards. Fish and Wildlife Service additional information in our files did Species Description not present substantial scientific 50 CFR Part 17 information indicating that listing the Grizzly bears are generally larger and RIN 1018–AT38 Yellowstone grizzly bear population as more heavily built than other bears endangered may be warranted. (Craighead and Mitchell 1982, p. 517; Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Therefore, we are not initiating a status Schwartz et al. 2003b, p. 558). Grizzly and Plants; Final Rule Designating the review in response to this petition. bears can be distinguished from black Greater Yellowstone Area Population DATES: This rule becomes effective April bears, which also occur in the lower 48 of Grizzly Bears as a Distinct 30, 2007. States, by longer, curved claws, humped Population Segment; Removing the shoulders, and a face that appears to be ADDRESSES: Comments and materials Yellowstone Distinct Population concave (Craighead and Mitchell 1982, received, as well as supporting Segment of Grizzly Bears From the p. 517). A wide range of coloration from documentation used in preparation of Federal List of Endangered and light brown to nearly black is common this final rule, are available for Threatened Wildlife; 90-Day Finding on (LeFranc et al. 1987, pp. 17–18). Spring inspection, by appointment, during a Petition To List as Endangered the shedding, new growth, nutrition, and normal business hours, at our Missoula Yellowstone Distinct Population coat condition all affect coloration. office, Grizzly Bear Recovery Segment of Grizzly Bears Guard hairs (long, course outer hair Coordinator, University Hall, Room forming a protective layer over the soft AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, #309, University of Montana, Missoula, underfur) are often pale in color at the Interior. Montana 59812. Call (406) 243–4903 to tips; hence the name ‘‘grizzly’’ ACTION: make arrangements. In addition, certain Final rule; notice of petition (Craighead and Mitchell 1982, p. 517). documents such as the Strategy and finding. In the lower 48 States, the average information appended to the recovery weight of grizzly bears is generally 200 SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife plan are available at http://mountain- to 300 kilograms (kg) (400 to 600 Service (Service, we or us), hereby prairie.fws.gov/species/mammals/ pounds (lb)) for males and 110 to 160 establish a distinct population segment grizzly/yellowstone.htm. (DPS) of the grizzly bear (Ursus arctos kg (250 to 350 lb) for females (Craighead horribilis) for the Greater Yellowstone FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. and Mitchell 1982, pp. 518–520). Area (GYA) and surrounding area Christopher Servheen, Grizzly Bear Grizzly bears are long-lived mammals, (hereafter referred to as the Yellowstone Recovery Coordinator, U.S. Fish and generally living to be around 25 years DPS, Yellowstone grizzly bear DPS, or Wildlife Service, at our Missoula office old (LeFranc et al. 1987, pp. 47, 51). (see ADDRESSES above) or telephone Yellowstone grizzly bear population) Taxonomy and remove this DPS from the List of (406) 243–4903. Individuals who are Threatened and Endangered Wildlife. hearing-impaired or speech-impaired Grizzly bears (Ursus arctos horribilis) The Yellowstone grizzly bear may call the Federal Relay Service at 1– are vertebrates that belong to the Class population is no longer an endangered 800–877–8337 for TTY assistance. Mammalia, Order Carnivora, and Family or threatened population pursuant to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Ursidae. The grizzly bear is a member of the brown bear species (U. arctos) that the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as Background amended (Endangered Species Act or occurs in North America, Europe, and the Act) (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), based Prior to publication of this final rule, Asia; the subspecies U. a. horribilis is on the best scientific and commercial we—(1) Finalized the Conservation limited to North America (Rausch 1963, data available. Robust population Strategy (Strategy) that will guide post- p. 43; Servheen 1999, pp. 50–53). Early growth, coupled with State and Federal delisting monitoring and management of taxonomic descriptions of U. arctos cooperation to manage mortality and the grizzly bear in the GYA; (2) based primarily on skull measurements habitat, widespread public support for appended the habitat-based recovery described more than 90 subspecies grizzly bear recovery, and the criteria to the 1993 Recovery Plan and (Merriam 1918, pp. 9–16), but this was development of adequate regulatory the Strategy; and (3) appended an later revised to 2 subspecies in North mechanisms has brought the updated and improved methodology for America (U. a. middendorfi on the Yellowstone grizzly bear population to calculating total population size, known islands of the Kodiak archipelago in the point where making a change to its to unknown mortality ratios, and Alaska and U. a. horribilis in the rest of status is appropriate. sustainable mortality limits for the North America) (Rausch 1963, p. 43). The delisting of the Yellowstone DPS Yellowstone grizzly bear population to The two North American subspecies does not change the threatened status of the 1993 Recovery Plan and the approach of Rausch (1963, p. 43) is the remaining grizzly bears in the lower Strategy. Additionally, the U.S. generally accepted by most taxonomists 48 States, which remain protected by Department of Agriculture (USDA) today, and is the approach we use. the Act. In an upcoming but separate Forest Service finalized the Forest Plan Additional discussion of this issue can notice, we will initiate a 5-year status Amendment for Grizzly Bear Habitat be found in the proposed rule (70 FR review of the grizzly bear as listed under Conservation for the GYA National 69854–69855, November 17, 2005). The the Act based on additional scientific Forests and made a decision to original 1975 listing (40 FR 31734– information that is currently being incorporate this Amendment into the 31736, July 28, 1975) had been collected and analyzed. Finally, we affected National Forests’ Land inadvertently modified in the List of announce a 90-day finding on a petition Management Plans. Yellowstone and Endangered and Threatened Wildlife to (submitted during the public comment Grand Teton National Parks also U. arctos with a historic holarctic range. period for the proposed rule) to list the appended the habitat standards With this final rule, we have corrected Yellowstone grizzly bear population as described in the Strategy to their Park this error to reflect the original listed endangered on the Federal List of Superintendent’s Compendiums, entity of U. arctos horribilis with a Threatened and Endangered Wildlife thereby assuring that these National historic range of North America. VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:50 Mar 28, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\29MRR2.SGM 29MRR2 rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 60 / Thursday, March 29, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 14867 Behavior reproduction is approximately 6 years as 1.65 kg/day (3.64 lb/day) (Craighead Although adult bears are normally old, and the average litter size is 2.04 and Mitchell 1982, p. 544). Grizzly bears solitary (Nowak and Paradiso 1983, p. cubs (Schwartz et al. 2006a, p. 19). Cubs must consume foods rich in protein and 971), home ranges of adult bears are born in a den in late January or early carbohydrates in order to build up fat frequently overlap (Schwartz et al. February and remain with the female for reserves to survive denning and post- 2003b, pp. 565–566). Grizzly bears 2 to 3 years before the mother will again denning periods (Rode and Robbins display a behavior called natal mate and produce another litter 2000, pp. 1643–1644). These layers of philopatry in which dispersing young (Schwartz et al. 2003b, p. 564). Grizzly fat are crucial to the hibernating bear as establish home ranges within or bears have one of the slowest they provide a source of energy and overlapping their mother’s (Waser and reproductive rates among terrestrial insulate the bear from cold Jones 1983, p. 361; Schwartz et al. mammals, resulting primarily from the temperatures, and are equally important 2003b, p. 566). This type of movement late age of first reproduction, small in providing energy to the bear upon average litter size, and the long interval makes dispersal across landscapes a emergence from the den when food is between litters (Nowak and Paradiso slow process. Radio-telemetry and still sparse relative to metabolic 1983, p. 971; Schwartz et al. 2003b, p. genetics data suggests females establish requirements (Craighead and Mitchell 564). Given the above factors and home ranges an average of 9.8 to 14.3 1982, p. 544). natural mortality, it may take a single kilometers (km) (6.1 to 8.9 miles (mi)) Although the digestive system of female 10 years to replace herself in a away from the center of their mother’s bears is essentially that of a carnivore, population (U.S. Fish and Wildlife home range, whereas males generally bears are successful omnivores, and in Service 1993, p. 4). Grizzly bear females stray further, establishing home ranges some areas may be almost entirely cease breeding successfully some time roughly 29.9 to 42.0 km (18.6 to 26.0 mi) herbivorous (Jacoby et al.
Recommended publications
  • A Historical Context and Methodology for Evaluating Trails, Roads, and Highways in California
    A Historical Context and Methodology for Evaluating Trails, Roads, and Highways in California Prepared by The California Department of Transportation Sacramento, California ® ® © 2016 California Department of Transportation. All Rights Reserved. Cover photography provided Caltrans Headquarters Library. Healdsburg Wheelmen photograph courtesy of the Healdsburg Museum. For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats upon request. Please call: (916) 653-0647 Voice, or use the CA Relay Service TTY number 1-800-735-2929 Or write: Chief, Cultural Studies Office Caltrans, Division of Environmental Analysis P.O. Box 942874, MS 27 Sacramento, CA 94274-0001 A HISTORICAL CONTEXT AND METHODOLOGY FOR EVALUATING TRAILS, ROADS, AND HIGHWAYS IN CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Cultural Studies Office Division of Environmental Analysis California Department of Transportation Sacramento 2016 © 2016 California Department of Transportation. All Rights Reserved. OTHER THEMATIC STUDIES BY CALTRANS Water Conveyance Systems in California, Historic Context Development and Evaluation Procedures (2000) A Historical Context and Archaeological Research Design for Agricultural Properties in California (2007) A Historical Context and Archaeological Research Design for Mining Properties in California (2008) A Historical Context and Archeological Research Design for Townsite Properties in California (2010) Tract Housing In California, 1945–1973: A Context for National Register Evaluation (2013) A Historical Context and Archaeological Research Design for Work Camp Properties in California (2013) MANAGEMENT SUMMARY The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) prepared this study in response to the need for a cohesive and comprehensive examination of trails, roads, and highways in California, and with a methodological approach for evaluating these types of properties for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP).
    [Show full text]
  • Global Factory List As of August 3Rd, 2020
    Global Factory List as of August 3rd, 2020 Target is committed to providing increased supply chain transparency. To meet this objective, Target publishes a list of all tier one factories that produce our owned-brand products, national brand products where Target is the importer of record, as well as tier two apparel textile mills and wet processing facilities. Target partners with its vendors and suppliers to maintain an accurate factory list. The list below represents factories as of August 3rd, 2020. This list is subject to change and updates will be provided on a quarterly basis. Factory Name State/Province City Address AMERICAN SAMOA American Samoa Plant Pago Pago 368 Route 1,Tutuila Island ARGENTINA Angel Estrada Cla. S.A, Buenos Aires Ciudad de Buenos Aires Ruta Nacional N 38 Km. 1,155,Provincia de La Rioja AUSTRIA Tiroler Glashuette GmbH Werk: Schneegattern Oberosterreich Lengau Kobernauserwaldstrase 25, BAHRAIN WestPoint Home Bahrain W.L.L. Al Manamah (Al Asimah) Riffa Building #1912, Road # 5146, Block 951,South Alba Industrial Area, Askar BANGLADESH Campex (BD) Limited Chittagong zila Chattogram Building-FS SFB#06, Sector#01, Road#02, Chittagong Export Processing Zone,, Canvas Garments (Pvt.) Ltd Chittagong zila Chattogram 301, North Baizid Bostami Road,,Nasirabad I/A, Canvas Building Chittagong Asian Apparels Chittagong zila Chattogram 132 Nasirabad Indstrial Area,Chattogram Clifton Cotton Mills Ltd Chittagong zila Chattogram CDA plot no-D28,28-d/2 Char Ragmatia Kalurghat, Clifton Textile Chittagong zila Chattogram 180 Nasirabad Industrial Area,Baizid Bostami Road Fashion Watch Limited Chittagong zila Chattogram 1363/A 1364 Askarabad, D.T. Road,Doublemoring, Chattogram, Bangladesh Fortune Apparels Ltd Chittagong zila Chattogram 135/142 Nasirabad Industrial Area,Chattogram KDS Garment Industries Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Highway 1, Pacific
    TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION 2000 STATE HIGHWAY MOTOR CARRIER CRASH RATE TABLES Published by Transportation Data Section Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit In cooperation with the Motor Carrier Transportation Division January 2002 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2000 OREGON MOTOR CARRIER CRASH RATE TABLES Oregon Department of Transportation Transportation Development Division Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit 555 13th Street NE, Suite 2 Salem, OR 97301-4178 Mark Wills Manager January 2002 The information contained in this publication is compiled from individual driver reports, police crash reports, and motor carrier reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720 and OAR 740-100-0020. The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver and motor carrier, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit cannot guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented, nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 PART ONE - RESULTS OF ANALYSIS Table I – Summary of Motor Carrier Crash Rates on State Highways for 2000.... 5 Table II – Monthly Summary of Crashes-Injuries-Deaths from 1996 to 2000......... 6 Table III – Motor Carrier Crashes and Rates from 1998 to 2000 ............................ 7 Table IV – Motor Carrier Crashes by Highway Type – 1996 to 2000...................... 8 Table V – Motor Carrier Crash Rates on Major Highways from 1996 to 2000 ....... 9 Table VI – Truck At-Fault Summary Ranking by Cause A.
    [Show full text]
  • JORDAN Roads Sector Assessment June 2019
    JORDAN Roads Sector Assessment June 2019 Disclaimer © 2019 The World Bank | 1818 H Street NW, Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org Report No: AUS0001171. Some rights reserved. This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this work is subject to copyright. Because The World Bank encourages dissemination of its knowledge, this work may be reproduced, in whole or in part, for noncommercial purposes as long as full attribution to this work is given. Attribution: World Bank. 2019. Jordan: Fiscal Commitments and Contingent Liability Management for PPPs. World Bank, Washington, DC. All queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to World Bank Publications, The World Bank Group, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2625; e-mail: [email protected]. 2 • Jordan: Roads Sector Assessment Table of Contents Acknowledgements ii Abbreviations & Acronyms iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • 1997 State Highway Accident Rate Tables
    n TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT BRANCH n 1997 STATE HIGHWAY ACCIDENT RATE TABLES Published by Transportation Data Section Accident Data Unit August 1998 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION T A B L E OF C O N T E N T S Part Page Introduction......................................................................................................................3 Results of Analysis...............................................................................................I 5 Facts of Interest...................................................................................................I 6 Table I - Comparison of Motor Vehicle Death Rates.............................................I 7 Table II - 1993-1997 Traffic Accident Rates..........................................................I 8 Table III - Comparison of 1996-1997 Accident Rate Data.....................................I 9 Table IV - Comparative Accident Rates by Jurisdiction.........................................I 10 Highway Numbers, Names and Routes.................................................................I 11 Map - State Highway System................................................................................I 15 Map - Portland System Enlargement...................................................................I 15 Accident Rate Data by Section.............................................................................II 17 Summary of Fatal Traffic Accidents, State of Oregon...........................................III 245 Appendix A: Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations..........................................................251
    [Show full text]
  • In PDF Format
    Attachment 1 Page 1 of 41 TEA-21 HIGH PRIORITY PROJECTS - FY 1999 ALLOCATIONS TEA-21 FY 1999 ALLOCATION DEMO ID SECT. 1602 STATE PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJ. NO. PROJECT STATE TOTALS AL002 957 Alabama Construct bridge over Tennessee River connecting Muscle Shoals and 1,500,000 Florence AL002 1498 Alabama Construct bridge over Tennessee River connecting Muscle Shoals and 150,000 Florence AL002 1837 Alabama Construct bridge over Tennessee River connecting Muscle Shoals and 150,000 Florence AL006 760 Alabama Construct new I-10 bridge over the Mobile River in Mobile, Alabama. 1,617,187 AL007 423 Alabama Construct the Montgomery Outer Loop from US-80 to I-85 via I-65 1,535,625 AL007 1506 Alabama Construct Montgomery outer loop from US 80 to I-85 via I-65 1,770,000 AL007 1835 Alabama Construct Montgomery Outer Loop from US 80 to I-85 via I-65 150,000 AL008 156 Alabama Construct Eastern Black Warrior River Bridge. 1,950,000 AL008 1500 Alabama Construction of Eastern Black Warrior River Bridge 1,162,500 AL009 777 Alabama Construct Anniston Eastern Bypass from I-20 to Fort McClellan in 6,021,000 Calhoun County AL009 1505 Alabama Construct Anniston Eastern Bypass from I-20 to Fort McClellan in 300,000 Calhoun County AL009 1832 Alabama Construct Anniston Eastern Bypass 150,000 AL011 102 Alabama Initiate construction on controlled access highway between the Eastern 450,000 edge of Madison County and Mississippi State line. AL015 189 Alabama Construct Crepe Myrtle Trail near Mobile, Alabama 180,000 AL016 206 Alabama Conduct engineering, acquire right-of-way and construct the 2,550,000 Birmingham Northern Beltline in Jefferson County.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 State Highway Crash Rate Tables
    TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION 2008 STATE HIGHWAY CRASH RATE TABLES Published by Transportation Data Section Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit August 2009 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2008 OREGON STATE HIGHWAY CRASH RATE TABLES Oregon Department of Transportation Transportation Development Division Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit 555 13th Street NE, Suite 2 Salem, OR 97301-4178 Robin Ness Manager August 2009 The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit compiles data for reported motor vehicle traffic crashes occurring on city streets, county roads and state highways. The data supports various local, county and state traffic safety programs, engineering and planning projects, legislative concepts, and law enforcement services. Legally reportable motor vehicle traffic crashes are those involving death, bodily injury, or damage to personal property in excess of $500 (for crashes that occurred prior to 9/01/1997) or $1,000 (for crashes that occurred between 9/01/1997 and 12/31/2003). As of 01/01/2004, drivers are required to file an Accident and Insurance Report Form with DMV within 72 hours when damage to the driver's vehicle is over $1,500; damage to any vehicle is over $1,500 and any vehicle is towed from the scene as a result of damage from the accident; if injury or death resulted from the accident; or if damage to any one person’s property other than a vehicle involved in the accident is over $1,500. For more information on filing requirements, please contact DMV. The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit cannot guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented; nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate.
    [Show full text]
  • H. R. 2400 an ACT to Authorize Funds for Federal-Aid Highways, High- Way Safety Programs, and Transit Programs, and for Other Purposes
    105TH CONGRESS 2D SESSION H. R. 2400 AN ACT To authorize funds for Federal-aid highways, high- way safety programs, and transit programs, and for other purposes. 105TH CONGRESS 2D SESSION H. R. 2400 AN ACT To authorize funds for Federal-aid highways, highway safety programs, and transit programs, and for other purposes. 1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- 2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 2 1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. 2 (a) SHORT TITLE.ÐThis Act may be cited as the 3 ``Building Efficient Surface Transportation and Equity 4 Act of 1998''. 5 (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.Ð Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. Sec. 2. Definitions. Sec. 3. Savings clause. TITLE IÐFEDERAL-AID HIGHWAYS Sec. 101. Amendments to title 23, United States Code. Sec. 102. Authorization of appropriations. Sec. 103. Obligation ceiling. Sec. 104. Apportionments. Sec. 105. Interstate maintenance program. Sec. 106. National Highway System. Sec. 107. Highway bridge program. Sec. 108. Surface transportation program. Sec. 109. Congestion mitigation and air quality improvement program. Sec. 110. High risk road safety improvement program. Sec. 111. Minimum allocation. Sec. 112. Appalachian Development Highway System. Sec. 113. High cost Interstate System reconstruction and improvement program. Sec. 114. Recreational trails program. Sec. 115. National corridor planning and development program. Sec. 116. Coordinated border infrastructure and safety program. Sec. 117. Federal lands highways program. Sec. 118. National scenic byways program. Sec. 119. Variable pricing pilot program. Sec. 120. Toll roads, bridges, and tunnels. Sec. 121. Construction of ferry boats and ferry terminal facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 Oregon State Highway Crash Rate Tables
    2002 OREGON STATE HIGHWAY CRASH RATE TABLES Oregon Department of Transportation Transportation Development Division Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit 555 13th Street NE, Suite 2 Salem, OR 97301-4178 Mark Wills Manager September 2003 The information contained in this publication is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720. The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. ii T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S Page Introduction............................................................................................................ 1 PART ONE - Results of Analysis Facts of Interest ............................................................................................ 5 Table I - Fatality Rates by VMT and Population, 1971 - 2002...................... 6 Table II - Crashes per Million Vehicle Miles, 1998 - 2002 ............................. 7 Table III - Crash Rate Components, 2001 - 2002 .......................................... 8 Table IV - 2002 Crash and Fatality Rates by Jurisdiction............................... 9 Highway Numbers, Names and Routes........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service
    Thursday, November 17, 2005 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designating the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem Population of Grizzly Bears as a Distinct Population Segment; Removing the Yellowstone Distinct Population Segment of Grizzly Bears From the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife; Proposed Rule VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:48 Nov 16, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\17NOP2.SGM 17NOP2 69854 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 221 / Thursday, November 17, 2005 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR sustainable mortality limits for the • January 9, 2006, from 4 to 8 p.m. at Yellowstone grizzly bear population. the Holiday Inn, 5 Baxter Lane, Fish and Wildlife Service Both the Conservation Strategy and the Bozeman, Montana. supplemental information to be • January 10, 2006, from 4 to 7 p.m. 50 CFR Part 17 appended to the Recovery Plan have at the Cody Auditorium, 1240 Beck RIN 1018–AT38 already undergone public review and Avenue, Cody Wyoming. comment (62 FR 19777, April 23, 1997; • January 11, 2006, from 4 to 8 p.m. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife 62 FR 47677, September 10, 1997; 64 FR at the Snow King Resort, 400 E. Snow and Plants; Designating the Greater 38464, July 16, 1999; 64 FR 38465, July King Avenue, Jackson, Wyoming. Yellowstone Ecosystem Population of 16, 1999; 65 FR 11340, March 2, 2000). • January 12, 2006, from 4 to 8 p.m. Grizzly Bears as a Distinct Population In a subsequent notice, the revised at the Shilo Inn, 780 Lindsay Boulevard, Segment; Removing the Yellowstone methodology pertaining to population Idaho Falls, Idaho.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Infrastructure Investments in Transport and Job Creation Examples From
    Assessment of Infrastructure Investments in Transport and Job Creation Public Disclosure Authorized Examples from Road Sector Investments in Lebanon and Jordan Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Final Report December 20, 2018 Assessment of Infrastructure Investments in Transport and Job Creation Final Report ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This report was prepared jointly by the World Bank and the International Labor Organisation (ILO). The World Bank team included Ziad Nakat, Radia Benamghar, Mira Morad, Rene Antonio Leon Solano, and Abdulhakim Ali Ahmed Al-Aghbari. The ILO team included Chris Donnges, Tomas Stenstorm, and Htun Hlaing. Assessment of Infrastructure Investments in Transport and Job Creation Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................................................... 2 DEFINITIONS ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 TRANSPORT SECTOR CONTEXT .................................................................................................................. 4 OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY ........................................................................................................................... 5 KEY FINDINGS AND OBSERVATIONS ......................................................................................................... 5 1. HOW MANY DIRECT JOBS
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 State Highway Motor Carrier Crash Rate Tables
    TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION 2006 STATE HIGHWAY MOTOR CARRIER CRASH RATE TABLES Published by Transportation Data Section Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit in cooperation with the Motor Carrier Transportation Division August 2007 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2006 OREGON MOTOR CARRIER CRASH RATE TABLES Oregon Department of Transportation Transportation Development Division Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit 555 13th Street NE, Suite 2 Salem, OR 97301-4178 Robin Ness Manager August 2007 The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit compiles data for reported motor vehicle traffic crashes occurring on city streets, county roads and state highways. The data supports various local, county and state traffic safety programs, engineering and planning projects, legislative concepts, and law enforcement services. Legally reportable motor vehicle traffic crashes are those involving death, bodily injury, or damage to personal property in excess of $500 (for crashes that occurred prior to 9/01/1997) or $1,000 (for crashes that occurred between 9/01/1997 and 12/31/2003). As of 01/01/2004, drivers are required to file an Accident and Insurance Report Form with DMV within 72 hours when damage to the driver's vehicle is over $1,500; damage to any vehicle is over $1,500 and any vehicle is towed from the scene as a result of damage from the accident; if injury or death resulted from the accident; or if damage to any one person’s property other than a vehicle involved in the accident is over $1,500. For more information on filing requirements, please contact DMV. The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers.
    [Show full text]