017 Transcript

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

017 Transcript Episode 017 Black Ships on Trojan Shores Today we will take a look at one of the most enduring myths of ancient history, the Trojan War as enshrined in epic form in The Iliad. In myth, this is the war where the face of Helen launched 1,000 Achaean ships, destined for Ilios, or Troy, where they would besiege the city and have their vengeance. You may wonder why the Trojan War as a focus for our podcast on maritime history. The sack of Troy, the Trojan Horse, all that happened on land, right? And yes, it did, but there is an undercurrent of maritime power running like an integral thread throughout the entire myth. Without the Achaean sea power, the entire story would change, and who knows how history would have differed. We’ll talk today about the role sea power played in the period, and how differing cultural views influenced the Mycenaeans, the Trojans, even the Hittites. This may be a long episode, because I also think it’s important to get an accurate picture of the Late Bronze Age world’s dying stages so that we can frame the emergence of the Sea Peoples in its proper light. And, there are many players on this stage, as I’m sure you’re aware. We’ve talked in past episodes a bit about Heinrich Schliemann’s discovery of one of these players, the Mycenaean civilization, and more specifically about his unearthing of golden artifacts from shaft graves at Mycenae. Beyond Mycenae, I think it’s pretty widely known that Schliemann also discovered the site of Troy with its many layers. He had his personal theories about the sites back then, and historians in the intervening years have proposed many alternative theories, even today we are still simply theorizing. Was the site of Troy the actual site of the events in The Iliad? Was the Trojan War even real in a historical sense? If so, where does the epic drama of Homer’s tale depart from historical events? And, the bottom line for any student of history, what contemporary sources are there to even help shed some light on any of these inquires? Many questions to begin with today, but I trust that in looking at some of those sources we can today see some of the historical reality underlying one of the earliest tales of a war where a naval force played a large role. Episode 017 1 A brief warning here before the plunge: this whole discussion is quite complex. My hope is to present you with a coherent picture of a distinct possibility of what the history looked like, but keep in mind there are many theories to explain the history behind Homer’s Trojan War and the proper interpretation of the historical documents that we’ll look at. This discussion could take up hours if we let it, indeed, stacks of books have been devoted to the subject. In addition to the complexity, this topic dovetails into our future discussions of the Sea Peoples and the Late Bronze Age Collapse, so I want to lay a good foundation today and will reference much of what we say today in the upcoming episodes. Here’s to hoping it all makes sense when we’re through! Perhaps it is ill advised, but for today’s episode I’m going to make the assumption that we’re all familiar with the basic plot of the Trojan War as recounted in Homer’s Iliad. The recent Hollywood adaption in the film Troy is, to put it bluntly, a travesty to Bronze Age history, as well as to the Homeric tradition of the myth itself, but I’ll suppress any pedantic urges for now and hope you all can do likewise. If you’re looking for a good podcast treatment of the Trojan War myth, look no further than “The Myths and History of Greece and Rome” by Paul Vincent. He dedicates a handful of episodes to recounting the myth, and I’ve enjoyed his podcast immensely. With the preliminaries behind us then, let us now take the plunge. We’ve seen that the Mycenaeans of 1500 through 1300 BCE were quite active in Mediterranean trade, making much contact with the Levant, Cyprus, and some coastal areas of Anatolia. They were also the originators of the oared galley, the ‘long-ships’ that Homer has the Achaeans using to make their way over to Troy. Some have said the the Homeric authorship of the epic at some point in the 8th century BCE (which is a huge debate in and of itself) would have resulted in later Greek traditions and practices seeping into what was supposed to have taken place at least 400 years before Homer’s time. There is certainly a degree of that transference present, as there will be in most any writing or history, but with regard to the description of ships in the Iliad, much of what Homer described has been proven accurate through archaeological finds dated to the period of the 13th century BCE, the period where historians generally place the Trojan War. The ‘black ships’ we talked about in Episode 15, for example, not to mention the fact that Homer describes longships steered by a single pilot on a single steering rudder. That is precisely how early period galleys were built, while the galleys of Homer’s day actually had dual steering rudders. These few specifics aside, though, before we can really get into the real-history events behind the Trojan War, a civilization that’s not yet graced the stage of our podcast needs to make its debut. Episode 017 2 This civilization is that of the Hittites, a super-power of the Bronze Age world, though a relative late-bloomer in the grand scheme of history, as were the Mycenaeans. The discovery of the Hittite civilization and their history is another fascinating topic that is way beyond our scope, and I’m actually not sure whether a podcast has yet examined the Hittites in depth. For our purposes today it’s enough to know that they were the occupiers of much of Anatolia, having emerged as a distinct civilization only in the 17th century BCE, but having had progenitors in the region for several hundred years previous. The Hittites borrowed their cuneiform writing from the Assyrians, and while they did occupy an expanse of territory that bordered the Mediterranean along much of Anatolia’s southern coastline, stretching around to the Levant coastal city of Ugarit, reaching right to the walls of Byblos at one point, the Hittites were not seagoing peoples by any means. These were the famed charioteers of the ancient world, a huge portion of their empire land-locked. This does not mean that they had no maritime connections, however. The Hittites controlled many coastal cities, and though the cities remained nominally independent and reliant on formal alliances or vassal- city agreements with the Hittite king, it is thought that the Hittites would call upon the ships of major coastal cities in times of need. We’ll see this proven out when we get to look at one of the oldest recorded naval battles in history, waged by the Hittite king Suppiluliuma II against some invading Cypriots, but using the ships of a Ugarit, a Syrian city controlled by the Hittites. Episode 017 3 Being largely landlocked and dependent on the trade of its coastal allies, the Hittites were keen on retaining control of the Levant for as long as they could. This is the was the cause of the Battle of Qadesh, which took place around 1275 BCE. Ramses II of Egypt attempted to expand Egyptian control northward, but the Hittites were having none of it. That’s getting a bit ahead of ourselves, perhaps, but it’s good to keep in mind at least. As I’ve said, the Hittites controlled much of Anatolia, varying portions of the Levant, and their eastern reaches abutted the empires of Assyria and the Mittani. The real focal point for us today though is the western most stretches of Anatolia, the coastlines and the islands that dot the edge of Aegean Sea but are a moderate distance from Greece proper. Knowing what we know at this point, that the Mycenaeans were quite active on the seas, and that the western coast of Anatolia was just barely within the reach of Hittite influence, it should be no surprise to find out that many areas along the western coasts of Anatolia were destinations for Mycenaean goods, to a moderate extent. This is the point where the physical letters and records found at Hittite archaeological sites come into play, and its as good a point as any to emphasize just how amazing the discovery of these Hittite records have been to our understanding of the Bronze Age world. Much like the Mycenaeans, Minoans, and others, the Hittites were not really known until the archaeology boom of the 19th century. Since that time, many thousands of Hittite cuneiform tablets have been discovered throughout Anatolia, none more important than a cache of 2,500 tablets found at the ancient equivalent of the Hittite Foreign Office. These tablets, among others, will form the basis of our talk about the Trojan War, and they are a fascinating glimpse at diplomacy and the inner workings of the great ancient empires, while also being 3,000 year old windows into the same human nature that sits at the helms of the nations today. As we look at these documents and get into the intricacies of war and politics, a basic framework is instructive.
Recommended publications
  • Separating Fact from Fiction in the Aiolian Migration
    hesperia yy (2008) SEPARATING FACT Pages399-430 FROM FICTION IN THE AIOLIAN MIGRATION ABSTRACT Iron Age settlementsin the northeastAegean are usuallyattributed to Aioliancolonists who journeyed across the Aegean from mainland Greece. This articlereviews the literary accounts of the migration and presentsthe relevantarchaeological evidence, with a focuson newmaterial from Troy. No onearea played a dominantrole in colonizing Aiolis, nor is sucha widespread colonizationsupported by the archaeologicalrecord. But the aggressive promotionof migrationaccounts after the PersianWars provedmutually beneficialto bothsides of theAegean and justified the composition of the Delian League. Scholarlyassessments of habitation in thenortheast Aegean during the EarlyIron Age are remarkably consistent: most settlements are attributed toAiolian colonists who had journeyed across the Aegean from Thessaly, Boiotia,Akhaia, or a combinationof all three.1There is no uniformityin theancient sources that deal with the migration, although Orestes and his descendantsare named as theleaders in mostaccounts, and are credited withfounding colonies over a broadgeographic area, including Lesbos, Tenedos,the western and southerncoasts of theTroad, and theregion betweenthe bays of Adramyttion and Smyrna(Fig. 1). In otherwords, mainlandGreece has repeatedly been viewed as theagent responsible for 1. TroyIV, pp. 147-148,248-249; appendixgradually developed into a Mountjoy,Holt Parker,Gabe Pizzorno, Berard1959; Cook 1962,pp. 25-29; magisterialstudy that is includedhere Allison Sterrett,John Wallrodt, Mal- 1973,pp. 360-363;Vanschoonwinkel as a companionarticle (Parker 2008). colm Wiener, and the anonymous 1991,pp. 405-421; Tenger 1999, It is our hope that readersinterested in reviewersfor Hesperia. Most of trie pp. 121-126;Boardman 1999, pp. 23- the Aiolian migrationwill read both articlewas writtenin the Burnham 33; Fisher2000, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of a Forgotten Kingdom? Survey Archaeology and the Historical Geography of Central Western Anatolia in the Second Millennium BC
    European Journal of Archaeology 20 (1) 2017, 120–147 This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Story of a Forgotten Kingdom? Survey Archaeology and the Historical Geography of Central Western Anatolia in the Second Millennium BC 1,2,3 1,3 CHRISTOPHER H. ROOSEVELT AND CHRISTINA LUKE 1Department of Archaeology and History of Art, Koç University, I˙stanbul, Turkey 2Research Center for Anatolian Civilizations, Koç University, I˙stanbul, Turkey 3Department of Archaeology, Boston University, USA This article presents previously unknown archaeological evidence of a mid-second-millennium BC kingdom located in central western Anatolia. Discovered during the work of the Central Lydia Archaeological Survey in the Marmara Lake basin of the Gediz Valley in western Turkey, the material evidence appears to correlate well with text-based reconstructions of Late Bronze Age historical geog- raphy drawn from Hittite archives. One site in particular—Kaymakçı—stands out as a regional capital and the results of the systematic archaeological survey allow for an understanding of local settlement patterns, moving beyond traditional correlations between historical geography and capital sites alone. Comparison with contemporary sites in central western Anatolia, furthermore, identifies material com- monalities in site forms that may indicate a regional architectural tradition if not just influence from Hittite hegemony. Keywords: survey archaeology, Anatolia, Bronze Age, historical geography, Hittites, Seha River Land INTRODUCTION correlates of historical territories and king- doms have remained elusive.
    [Show full text]
  • People on Both Sides of the Aegean Sea. Did the Achaeans And
    BULLETIN OF THE MIDDLE EASTERN CULTURE CENTER IN JAPAN General Editor: H. I. H. Prince Takahito Mikasa Vol. IV 1991 OTTO HARRASSOWITZ • WIESBADEN ESSAYS ON ANCIENT ANATOLIAN AND SYRIAN STUDIES IN THE 2ND AND IST MILLENNIUM B.C. Edited by H. I. H. Prince Takahito Mikasa 1991 OTTO HARRASSOWITZ • WIESBADEN The Bulletin of the Middle Eastern Culture Center in Japan is published by Otto Harrassowitz on behalf of the Middle Eastern Culture Center in Japan. Editorial Board General Editor: H.I.H. Prince Takahito Mikasa Associate Editors: Prof. Tsugio Mikami Prof. Masao Mori Prof. Morio Ohno Assistant Editors: Yukiya Onodera (Northwest Semitic Studies) Mutsuo Kawatoko (Islamic Studies) Sachihiro Omura (Anatolian Studies) Die Deutsche Bibliothek - CIP-Einheitsaufnahme Essays on Ancient Anatolian and Syrian studies in the 2nd and Ist millennium B.C. / ed. by Prince Takahito Mikasa. - Wiesbaden : Harrassowitz, 1991 (Bulletin of the Middle Eastern Culture Center in Japan ; Vol. 4) ISBN 3-447-03138-7 NE: Mikasa, Takahito <Prinz> [Hrsg.]; Chükintö-bunka-sentä <Tökyö>: Bulletin of the . © 1991 Otto Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden This work, including all of its parts, is protected by Copyright. Any use beyond the limits of Copyright law without the permission of the publisher is forbidden and subject to penalty. This applies particularly to reproductions, translations, microfilms and storage and processing in electronic Systems. Printed on acidfree paper. Manufactured by MZ-Verlagsdruckerei GmbH, 8940 Memmingen Printed in Germany ISSN 0177-1647 CONTENTS PREFACE
    [Show full text]
  • ON LUWIANS and HITTITES*) Itamar SINGER
    8367_BIOR_05_5-6_01 30-01-2006 09:10 Pagina 412 429 BIBLIOTHECA ORIENTALIS LXII N° 5-6, september-december 2005 430 ON LUWIANS AND HITTITES*) Itamar SINGER (Tel Aviv) “History is written by the victors” is well demonstrated in ancient Anatolia. Most authorities would agree that Luwian was spoken by at least as many people as Hittite, yet books on the Hittites can easily fill up a library, whereas the reviewed monograph is the first to be entirely dedicated to the Luwians (except for dictionaries). Two ponderous cir- cumstances have teamed together to create this dispropor- tional picture, one inherent, the other accidental. For much of their common history the Hittites dominated the Luwian- speaking areas of Anatolia and, as a great power, they left behind extensive archives fitting their stature. The effects of this political disparity are further intensified by the fortu- itousness of discovery. Not a single tablet was found as yet in the vast territories in which Luwian was spoken (as the main language). To be sure, there must be cuneiform tablets buried in the major sites of western Anatolia, since letters sent from there have been found in Hattusa.1) Ironically, even the first Anatolian tablet to be published in the late 19th cen- tury was sent from the Land of Arzawa in the heart of Luwian-speaking Anatolia. But then, this letter, which was discovered in 1887 at Tell el-Amarna in Egypt, was written *)MELCHERT, H. C. (ed.) The Luwians. HdO 1-68. E.J. Brill Publish- ers, Leiden, 2003. (24 cm, XX, 383). ISBN 90 04 13009 8; ISSN 0169- 9423.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Pantheon Is Repeatedly Given in Kbo 4. 13: II 9-11', III 28-30', IV 14
    339 BIBLIOTHECA ORIENTALIS LXVIII N° 3-4, mei-augustus 2011 340 early pantheon is repeatedly given in KBo 4. 13: II 9-11’, III 28-30’, IV 14-16; on this text cf. M. Forlanini, “The Offering List of KBo 4. 13….”, SMEA 49, 2007, 259-280). But in this early period we do not find with them the Storm God of Nerik, as assumed by the author; this shrine never appears in old Hittite historical texts, nor in the Offering List of KBo 4. 13. Among the sanctuaries that, according to Popko, should have been added later on, Kummanni was probably already an important religious centre at the beginning of Hittite his- tory, since it is mentioned in CTH 3, B Obv. 17’ (cf. H. Otten, Eine althethitische Erzählung um die Stadt Zalpa, StBoT 17, Wiesbaden 1973, 10-11). In an overview on the economical aspects of the holy cities the author mentions king’s religious foundations, and distributions of goods from palaces or even from private individuals; we may remember that also the Hittite dynasts of Tumanna and Isuwa were sending part of the spoils coming from their military activity on the empire’s borders to several religious institutions all HETTITOLOGIE through the kingdom. Only for the sanctuary of Karahna we possess a complete inventory text, listing deities, festivals POPKO, M. — Arinna. Eine heilige Stadt der Hethiter. (Stu- and religious personal (perhaps more than five hundred peo- dien zu den Bogazköy-Texten, 50). Verlag Otto Harras- ple: see Darga, Karahna ≥ehri kült-envanteri, Istanbul 1973), sowitz, Wiesbaden, 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • East of the Achaeans: Making up for a Missed Opportunity While Reading Hittite Texts
    East of the Achaeans: Making up for a missed opportunity while reading Hittite texts The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Nagy, Gregory. 2015.07.22. "East of the Achaeans: Making up for a missed opportunity while reading Hittite texts." Classical Inquiries. http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:hul.eresource:Classical_Inquiries. Published Version https://classical-inquiries.chs.harvard.edu/east-of-the-achaeans- making-up-for-a-missed-opportunity-while-reading-hittite-texts/ Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:39666412 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Classical Inquiries Editors: Angelia Hanhardt and Keith Stone Consultant for Images: Jill Curry Robbins Online Consultant: Noel Spencer About Classical Inquiries (CI ) is an online, rapid-publication project of Harvard’s Center for Hellenic Studies, devoted to sharing some of the latest thinking on the ancient world with researchers and the general public. While articles archived in DASH represent the original Classical Inquiries posts, CI is intended to be an evolving project, providing a platform for public dialogue between authors and readers. Please visit http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:hul.eresource:Classical_Inquiries for the latest version of this article, which may include corrections, updates, or comments and author responses. Additionally, many of the studies published in CI will be incorporated into future CHS pub- lications.
    [Show full text]
  • Eaiœa by Łukasz Niesiołowski-Spanö and Marek Węcowskl 118
    P H I L I PP I K A Change, Continuity, /\ ltcrtu ms wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen Contributions to the Study and Connectivity of Ancient World Cultures North-Eastern Mediterranean at the turn of the Bronze Age Herausgegeben von/ Edited by and in the early Iron Age Joachim Hengstl, Elizabeth Irwin, Andrea Jördens, Torsten Mattern, Łobcrt Rollinger, Kai Ruffing, Orell Witthuhn Eaiœa by Łukasz Niesiołowski-Spanö and Marek Węcowskl 118 2018 2018 Harrassowitz Verlag ' W/iesbaden Harrassowitz Verlag ' Wiesbadćn Approaches to Mycenaean-Hittite Interconnections in the Late Bronze Age' Piotr Taracha This paper deals with both, archaeological evidence for cultural links between the Mycenaean world and western Anatolia in the Late Bronze Age, and the Ahhiyawa problem that is based on nearly thirty Hittite texts (among the thousands that had been found in the archives of the Hittite capital Hattusa, modern Bogazkale about 150 km as the crow flies east of Ankara), in which the term “Ahhiya(wa)” appearsf Both issues are indeed connected and must not be treated separately, although there are still many scholars to do so. What is more, concerning the former “there is an unfortunate tendency in much recent work on in- terconnections to transform hypothesis into established fact,"5 while the latter “still remains unsolved and unanswered almost a century after it was first introduced.`”* Beckman, Bryce, and Cline concur with the opinio communis in accepting the designation ofthe Mycenaeans by the Hittites as “Ahhiyawa” (and an. earlier version “Ahhiya"); still, they endorse and de- liberate on the question: If so, was it meant to be a.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Anatolian Languages and Cultures in Contact: Some Methodological Observations1
    Paola Cotticelli-Kurras†, Federico Giusfredi‡ † (University of Verona, Italy; [email protected]) ‡ (University of Verona, Italy; [email protected]) Ancient Anatolian languages and cultures in contact: some methodological observations1 In this paper, we will review the methodological and theoretical frameworks that have been developed to deal with the study of language contact and linguistic areas. We have tried to apply these methods to ancient contexts to check the existence of conditions for identifying language areas. Finally, we will provide examples of the combined linguistic and cultural-historical approach to ancient contact areas for phenomena in reciprocal direction, with particular ref- erence to the case of the Aegean and Ancient Near Eastern context of Ancient Anatolia. Keywords: Anatolian languages, language contact, cuneiform, cultural contact, linguistic areas. 1. Language contact, linguistic area and other related concepts In the last years, several scholars have discussed the contact between Ancient Anatolian lan- guages and some neighboring ones, including Greek and a number of Ancient Near Eastern ones, as indicative of a “linguistic area”, due to the fact that more general cultural contact be- tween language groups is a sign of the presence of linguistic areas. In order to successfully as- sess these approaches, it is appropriate to take into consideration the linguistic framework of reference. In the 1920s, Trubetzkoy (1928) 2 proposed the expression Sprachbund, “language league”, to describe the fact that unrelated languages could converge at the level of their structures fol- lowing intense contact. He took as example the almost prototypical area of the Balkans. The concept of Sprachbund has been coined to underline the evidence that languages can share similarities even though they are not genetically related.
    [Show full text]
  • Armies of the Ancient Near E
    Armies of the Ancient Near East 3,000 BC to 539 BC Organisation, tactics, dress and equipment. 210 illustrations and 9 maps. by Nigel StiUman and Nigel Tallis Egyptian Old Kingdom, Middle Kingdom, New Kingdom, S,itc, libyan, Nubian, KU 5hiu~. Sumerian, Akkadian, Eblaitc. Amoritc, HammUl1lpic lhhylonian, Old Assyrian, Human, MilaMian, K.ssitc, Middle: Assyrian, Neo Assyrian, Neo Babylonia n, Chaldun, GUlian, Mannatan, Iranian, Cimmerian, Hyluos. Canaanite, Syrian, Ugaritic, Hebrew, Philistine, Midianitc Arab, Cypriot, Phoenician, Hanian. Hillile, Anatolian, Sea Peoples, Neo Hinile, Aramaun, Phrygian. Lydian. Uranian, Elamilc, Minoan. Mycenaean, Harappan. A WARGAMES RESEARCH GROUP PUBLICATION INTRODUCTION This book. chronologically the finl in the W.R.G. series, attempts the diflkulltaP: ofducribingl he military organisa­ tion and equipment of the many civilisations ohhe ancienl Near East over a period of 2,500 years. It is du.slening to note tbatthis span oftime is equivalent to half of all recorded history and that a single companion volume, should anyone wish to attempt it, wou.ld have to encompass the period 539 BC to 1922 AD! We hope that our researches will rcOca the: .... St amount of archacologiaJ, pictorial and tarual evidence ..... hich has survived and been rW)vered from this region. It is a matter of some rcp-ct that tbe results of much of the research accumulated in this century has tended to be disperKd among a variety of sometimes obscure publications. Consequently, it is seldom that this mJterial is aplo!ted to its full potcoti.al IS a source for military history. We have attempted 10 be as comptcbensive IS possible and to make UK of the lcuer known sourcCI and the most recent ruearm.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nordic Origins of the Iliad and Odyssey: an Up-To-Date Survey of the Theory
    Athens Journal of Mediterranean Studies- Volume 3, Issue 2 – Pages 163-186 The Nordic Origins of the Iliad and Odyssey: An Up-to-date Survey of the Theory By Felice Vinci An up-to-date survey of the theory proposed in "The Baltic Origins of Homer’s Epic Tales" is presented here. The real setting of the Iliad and Odyssey can be identified not as the Mediterranean Sea, where it proves to be undermined by many incongruities, but rather in the north of Europe. The oral sagas that originated the two poems came from the Baltic regions, where the Bronze Age flourished in the 2nd millennium BC and where many Homeric places, such as Troy and Ithaca, can still be identified today. The blond seafarers who founded the Mycenaean civilization in the Aegean in the 16th century BC brought these tales from Scandinavia to Greece after the end of the climatic optimum. These peoples then rebuilt their original world – where the Trojan War and many other mythological events had taken place – farther south in Mediterranean waters, transferring significant names from north to south. Through many generations, they preserved the memory of the heroic age and the feats performed by their ancestors in their lost Hyperborean homeland, until the oral tradition was put into written form around the 8th Century BC, when alphabetical writing was introduced in Greece. This new prospect can open new developments as to the European prehistory and the dawn of the Greek civilization. Keywords: Homer, Bronze Age, Nordic, Iliad, Odyssey The Northern Features of Homer’s World Northern Features of Climate, Clothes, Food, and Vessels Homer’s world presents northern features.
    [Show full text]
  • Troy in Recent Perspective Author(S): D
    Troy in Recent Perspective Author(s): D. F. Easton, J. D. Hawkins, A. G. Sherratt, E. S. Sherratt Source: Anatolian Studies, Vol. 52 (2002), pp. 75-109 Published by: British Institute at Ankara Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3643078 Accessed: 06/01/2010 13:41 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=biaa. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. British Institute at Ankara is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Anatolian Studies. http://www.jstor.org Anatolian Studies 52 (2002): 75-109 Troy in recent perspective D.F.
    [Show full text]
  • 03-Muzaffer Demir.3
    ON THE POSSIBLE PREVIOUS LINKS OF THE DARK AGE AIOLIAN COLONISTS WITH THEIR NEWLY COLONISED TERRITORIES Muzaffer DEM‹R* ÖZET Karanl›k Ça¤ Aiol kolonistlerinin liderleri ve onlar›n destekçilerinin Kyme’den Manisa’n›n Sipil Da¤›’na kadar olan bölgeyi kapsayan güney Aiolis’te ve Mysia’da koloniler kurmay› tercih etmelerinin sebeplerinden biri, e¤er aradaki soy kütü¤ü kabul edilirse, onlar›n bu topraklarla olan soy iliflkileri olabilir. Elimizdeki konuy- la ilgili kaynaklar›n mitolojik döneme ait olmas› bizleri mitolojinin tarihinin yaz›- lamayaca¤› düflüncesine sevk etmemelidir. Bu dönemdeki olaylara iliflkin muhte- mel gerçeklere, eldeki kaynaklar mant›kl› bir flekilde kavran›larak bir dereceye kadar eriflilebilir. Aiol ›rk›n›n atas› Aiolos’un iddia edilen o¤lu Makar ve Aiolos’un torunu Lesbus’un Peloponnesos’dan geldikleri ve muhtemelen iö.14.yüzy›l›n son çeyre¤inde Lesbos adas›na yerlefltikleri söylenmektedir. Kaynaklar özellikle Tanta- los ve onun o¤lu Pelops’un bu dönemde yaflam›fl ve yönetimlerini Sipil Da¤› çev- resinde merkezilefltirmifl gerçek kiflilikler olabilece¤ine iflaret etmektedir. Ancak Tantalos Phryg menfleli oldu¤u söylenen Truval›lar’›n kral› Truval› ‹los taraf›ndan yenilgiye u¤rat›l›r ve o¤lu Pelops bunun sonucunda ilk önce Boiotia ve daha sonra Peloponnesos’da Pisa flehrine göç etmek zorunda kal›r. Pelops önce Pisa flehrini ele geçirerek yönetimini güçlendirir. Daha sonra o¤lu Atreos Mykenai flehri merkezli Perseidai Hanedanl›¤›n› ele geçirerek Pelopidai Hanedanl›¤›n› kurar. Atreos bütün Peloponnesos ve Ege adalar›na kadar yönetimini geniflletir. Hitit belgeleri do¤rul- tusunda Miken Hellenleri Ahhiyawa olarak kabul edilecek olursa, yeni Pelopidai Hanedanl›¤› yönetimindeki Ahhiyawal›lar’›n Küçük Asya’n›n bat›s›na yönelik poli- tik müdahalelerinin devam etti¤i görülmektedir.
    [Show full text]