Acknowledgements

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Acknowledgements Planning, Building, & Environmental Services July 2018 REVISED DRAFT Climate Action Plan Acknowledgements Board of Supervisors Planning Commission Watershed Information & Conservation Council County of Napa Staff Ascent Environmental (Consultant) Napa County Community Members County staff would like to acknowledge and thank all community members who attended Climate Action Plan public workshops and hearings held in 2015-2017 and provided their comments to help shape this plan. Napa County Climate Action Plan – Revised Draft Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................ 1 1 Introduction .............................................................. 1-1 1.1 Climate Action Plan Overview ................................. 1-1 1.2 Introduction to Climate Change Science ................. 1-1 1.3 Regulatory Background ........................................... 1-3 1.4 Climate Action Plan Purpose and Objectives .......... 1-5 1.5 Co-Benefits ............................................................. 1-6 1.6 Community Action and Public Involvement ............. 1-7 2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory, Forecasts, and Reduction Targets ............................................. 2-1 2.1 Introduction ............................................................. 2-1 2.2 Inventory ................................................................. 2-3 2.3 Forecasts ................................................................ 2-8 2.4 Reduction Targets ................................................. 2-11 3 Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategies and Measures ................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Introduction ............................................................. 3-1 3.2 Summary of Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategies .. 3-1 3.3 Strategies and Measures to Reduce Greenhouse Gases ..................................................................... 3-3 4 Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation ....... 4-1 4.1 Introduction ............................................................. 4-1 4.2 Summary of Climate Change Effects and Vulnerability Assessment ........................................ 4-2 4.3 Adaptation Strategies and Measures .................... 4-11 5 Implementation and Monitoring .............................. 5-1 5.1 Introduction ............................................................. 5-1 5.2 Implementation Strategy ......................................... 5-1 5.3 Monitoring and Updates ........................................ 5-21 5.4 Ongoing Community Engagement and Participation .. 5-22 6 References ................................................................ 6-1 Appendices A Technical Memo #1 - Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory and Forecasts B Technical Memo #2 - Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Targets, Measures and Gap Analysis C Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment for Napa County D Climate Action Plan Consistency Checklist Napa County Climate Action Plan – Revised Draft i Table of Contents Figures 1-1 The Greenhouse Effect ....................................................... 1-2 2-1 Napa County 2014 GHG Emissions .................................... 2-7 2-2 Napa County BAU GHG Emissions Forecasts and Targets without CAP Measures ......................................... 2-12 4-1 The Nine Steps in the Adaptation Planning Process ........... 4-1 5-1 CAP Monitoring Schedule ................................................. 5-22 Tables 2-1 2014 Unincorporated Napa County Greenhouse Gas Inventory ............................................................................. 2-8 2-2 Unincorporated Napa County BAU GHG Emissions Forecasts: With and Without Reductions .......................... 2-10 3-1 Annual GHG Reductions by Sector due to Proposed Reduction Strategies and Measures ................................... 3-2 3-2 Effect of Plan Measures on County Emissions, 2020 and 2030 Targets, and 2050 Goal .............................................. 3-3 3-3 Summary of Building Energy Measures .............................. 3-6 3-4 Summary of On-Road Transportation Measures ............... 3-12 3-5 Summary of Solid Waste Measures .................................. 3-18 3-6 Summary of Agriculture Measures .................................... 3-20 3-7 Summary of Off-Road Measures ....................................... 3-23 3-8 Summary of Water and Wastewater Measures ................. 3-25 3-9 Summary of Land Use Change Measures ......................... 3-27 3-10 Summary of High-GWP Gases Measures ......................... 3-29 3-11 Summary of Multi-Sector Measures .................................. 3-31 4-1 Summary of Temperature Related Measures .................... 4-15 4-2 Summary of Wildfire Risk Measures ................................. 4-17 4-3 Summary of Water Supply and Quality Measures ............. 4-19 4-4 Summary of Flood Risk Measures .................................... 4-21 4-5 Summary of Sea-Level Rise Measures ............................. 4-23 5-1 Napa County CAP Implementation Assumptions for GHG Reduction and Adaptation Measures .................................. 5-5 ii Napa County Climate Action Plan – Revised Draft Acronyms and Abbreviations ºC degrees Celsius ºF degrees Fahrenheit AB Assembly Bill ABAG Association of Bay Area Governments APG California Adaptation Planning Guide BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District BAU Business-As-Usual BMP best management practices CAL FIRE California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection CALGreen California Green Building Standards Code CalRecycle California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery CAP Climate Action Plan CARB California Air Resources Board CEC California Energy Commission CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CFC chlorofluorocarbon CH4 methane CNG compressed natural gas CNR California Natural Resources Agency CO2 carbon dioxide CO2e carbon dioxide equivalent County County of Napa DWR California Department of Water Resources EIR Environmental Impact Report EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EV electric vehicle FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency F-gases fluorinated gases FTE full-time equivalent GHG greenhouse gas GWP global warming potential Napa County Climate Action Plan – Revised Draft iii Acronyms and Abbreviations HCFC hydrochlorofluorocarbons HFC hydrofluorocarbon HVAC heating, ventilation, and air conditioning IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change m meters MCE Marin Clean Energy MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization MT metric ton MTC Metropolitan Transportation Commission MTCO2e metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent N2O nitrous oxide NVTA Napa Valley Transportation Authority NVWT Napa Valley Wine Train O3 ozone PACE property assessed clean energy PFC perfluorocarbon PG&E Pacific Gas and Electric PM2.5 fine particulate matter with an aerodynamic resistance diameter of 2.5 micrometers or less ppm parts per million RCD Resource Conservation District RMP Refrigerant Management Program SB Senate Bill SCS Sustainable Communities Strategy SF6 sulfur hexafluoride SLCP short-lived climate pollutant TOD transit-oriented development UVA Upper Valley Waste Management Agency VMT vehicle miles traveled ZNE zero net energy iv Napa County Climate Action Plan – Revised Draft Source: County of Napa Executive Summary Executive Summary This Climate Action Plan (CAP) provides a comprehensive roadmap to address the challenges of climate change in unincorporated Napa The CAP aims to address climate change by County. Acting on climate change means both reducing greenhouse reducing GHG emissions from sources gas (GHG) emissions from local sources in the unincorporated within the unincorporated area, and by County and helping the community to adapt to climate change and identifying threats and strategies for adapting to future environmental conditions caused by improve its resilience over the long term. climate change. The scientific consensus is that it is “extremely likely” that global climate change is caused by GHG emissions associated with human activities, and that significant reductions in human-caused GHG emissions are needed by the mid-21st century to prevent the most the catastrophic effects of climate change. To this end, in 2006, the California Global Warmings Solutions Act (Assembly Bill [AB] 32) established the State’s first target to reduce GHG emissions, which As directed by AB 32 and SB 32, the State established a goal of lowering emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. aims to reduce annual GHG emissions to: California has been making steady progress and is expected to . 1990 levels by 2020, . achieve the 2020 target; however, ongoing reductions in GHG 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. emissions are needed as noted above. The State’s longer-term goal is to reduce emissions down to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. In 2016, Governor Brown signed Senate Bill (SB) 32 was signed into law, which established a new mid-term target of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. This target aligns with those of leading international governments such as the 29-nation European Union which adopted the same target in October 2014. The new 2030 target places California on a trajectory towards meeting its longer-term goal, which is to bring emissions down to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Over the last decade, the County of Napa (County) has taken several steps to begin addressing climate change and achieving reductions in GHG emissions, both in the County’s operations
Recommended publications
  • Preliminary Analysis
    SANTA CRUZ BRANCH LINE INTRA-COUNTY RECREATIONAL RAIL OPTIONS Preliminary Analysis Prepared for: Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission Prepared at the direction of: Hyde, Miller, Owen & Trost March 2003 3/23/03 1 Recreational Rail Options – Preliminary Analysis TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………….4 A. Purpose of Study………………………………………………………4 B. Summary of Existing U.S. Recreational Rail Operations………………………………………………………..5 C. Potential for Recreational Rail Operations on the Branch Line………………………………………7 II. POTENTIAL OPERATING SCENARIOS…………………………………8 A. Capitola Village – Aptos Village……………………………………..9 B. Santa Cruz – Capitola Village……………………………………….9 C. Santa Cruz – Davenport…………………………………………….10 D. Santa Cruz – Junction of Highway 1 and Highway 9……………..10 III. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF OPERATING SCENARIOS……………..11 A. Facility Needs and Assumptions……………………………………11 B. Preliminary Economic Forecasts…………………………………...11 1. Capitola Village – Aptos Village……………………………12 Notes to Table 1……………………………………………...13 2. Santa Cruz – Capitola Village………………………………14 3. Santa Cruz – Davenport…………………………………….14 4. Santa Cruz – Junction of Highway 1 and Highway 9……..15 IV. PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS…………………………………………16 3/23/03 2 Recreational Rail Options – Preliminary Analysis LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1. Economic Forecast – Capitola Village to Aptos Village Service………….12 TABLE 2. Economic Forecast – Santa Cruz to Capitola Village Service…………….14 TABLE 3. Economic Forecast – Santa Cruz to Junction of Highway 1 and Highway 9……………………………...….15 3/23/03 3 Recreational Rail Options – Preliminary Analysis I. INTRODUCTION A. Purpose of Study In 2000, the Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission (“Commission”) established itself as the Rail/Trail Authority for the purpose of acquiring and overseeing the future development of, and operations on, the Santa Cruz Branch Line (“Branch Line”).
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 California Rail Adventure Tour
    LINEUP Official Newsletter Of Motorcar Operators West 2015 California Rail Adventure Tour Napa Valley Railroad Western Rail Museum Amador Central Railroad Ardenwood South Pacific Coast Railroad Niles Canyon Railroad Santa Cruz and Monterey Bay Railroad Santa Cruz Big Trees and Pacific Railroad Volume 23, No. 1 Summer 2015 1 Motorcar Operators West Board of Directors Officers and Members Motorcar Operators West Documents Dave Balestreri President Bruce Hilliard 2320 E Street 19 Pebble Court Available at www.mowonline.org Sacramento, CA 95816 Sacramento, CA 95831 H (916) 444-6374 [email protected] C (916) 531-7536 MOW Webmaster [email protected] Karl Hovanitz www.mowonline.org 2110 S Halcyon Road Jamie Foster Jim Culbertson Vice President Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 [email protected] PO Box 221 (805) 481-7353 Courtland, CA 95615 [email protected] NARCOA Rule Book Certification Test H (916) 775-1894 Al McCracken C (209) 483-0903 Lynne Maddy 2916 Taper Avenue Email: [email protected] 1220 16th Street Santa Clara, CA 95051 Los Osos, CA 93402 (408)249-3120 Robert Courtemanche Secretary H (805) 528-5560 [email protected] 5760 Lynx Trail C (805) 704-0607 Pollock Pines, CA 95726 [email protected] Membership Committee Coordinator 530-644-6710 Harry Fisher C530-417-6784 John Martin 28819 Shadow Valley Lane 1360 J Street Santa Clarita, CA 91390 Glen Ford Treasurer Wasco, CA 93280 H (661) 296-0636 PO Box 129 (661) 331-7916 C (661) 733-3084 Rough and Ready, CA 95975 [email protected] Email: [email protected] H (530) 432-5487 C (530) 913-2386 Mike Mitchell Line Up Editor [email protected] PO Box 245 Dan Berg, Editor Guinda, CA 93021 2017 Mule Creek Road Alan Borchardt H (530) 796-2350 Las Vegas, NV 89134 2452 Travis Court C (707) 421-6333 (702) 341-8617 McKinleyville, CA 95519 [email protected] [email protected] H (707) 839-0636 C (707) 601-4335 Dan Berg LINE UP [email protected] Excursion Committee Chairman Volume 23 Number 1 2017 Mule Creek Road Summer 2015 John Haverty Las Vegas, NV 89134 Motorcar Operators West, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • AQ Conformity Amended PBA 2040 Supplemental Report Mar.2018
    TRANSPORTATION-AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT Metropolitan Transportation Commission Association of Bay Area Governments MARCH 2018 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Jake Mackenzie, Chair Dorene M. Giacopini Julie Pierce Sonoma County and Cities U.S. Department of Transportation Association of Bay Area Governments Scott Haggerty, Vice Chair Federal D. Glover Alameda County Contra Costa County Bijan Sartipi California State Alicia C. Aguirre Anne W. Halsted Transportation Agency Cities of San Mateo County San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission Libby Schaaf Tom Azumbrado Oakland Mayor’s Appointee U.S. Department of Housing Nick Josefowitz and Urban Development San Francisco Mayor’s Appointee Warren Slocum San Mateo County Jeannie Bruins Jane Kim Cities of Santa Clara County City and County of San Francisco James P. Spering Solano County and Cities Damon Connolly Sam Liccardo Marin County and Cities San Jose Mayor’s Appointee Amy R. Worth Cities of Contra Costa County Dave Cortese Alfredo Pedroza Santa Clara County Napa County and Cities Carol Dutra-Vernaci Cities of Alameda County Association of Bay Area Governments Supervisor David Rabbit Supervisor David Cortese Councilmember Pradeep Gupta ABAG President Santa Clara City of South San Francisco / County of Sonoma San Mateo Supervisor Erin Hannigan Mayor Greg Scharff Solano Mayor Liz Gibbons ABAG Vice President City of Campbell / Santa Clara City of Palo Alto Representatives From Mayor Len Augustine Cities in Each County City of Vacaville
    [Show full text]
  • North American Models for 2019
    North American Models for 2019 www.lgb.com 1 Get on board and join the fun with LGB! The LGB garden railroad is very durable and a highlight for any garden, no matter the weather. Whether it is Everything you need for endless family fun! branches or flower pots, our © Gebr. Märklin & Cie. GmbH / © Westend61 / Fotolia loadable freight Tank wagons can be filled, car doors can be opened 72403 Freight Train Starter Set and much more! cars can handle it all. The model railroad experience for the entire family! For example: Includes a Vehicle! S For example: 49172 Lehmann Sugar o m s! e d 72426 Freight Train Starter Set Company Car Display se loa ts in nd clude vehicles a Fillable low-side cars! 1. Unpack 2. Assemble Housings are UV-resistant and made of high-impact, 3. Go weather resistant materials. A unique experience for outdoors and indoors. Just unpack the starter set, assemble and let the fun begin! The Building Block Train Starter Set includes a Whether it is fresh water for the plants or Fillable tank wagons! set of 30 building blocks that can be assembled by soil for filling pots, LGB will help you young and old, to suit anyone’s imagination and have big fun in your garden! creativity. Increase the starter set’s play value by adding the Building Block Train Car (94063). Com- 24266 patible with other mass-marketed building blocks. For example: 48401 LGB Tank Car Just what every builder needs! The base plate is an ideal starting point for playing and building.
    [Show full text]
  • Daylight Division's Fall Meet to Be Held in Merced November 17Th
    Volume 15; Issue 4 4th Quarter, 2001 Daylight Division’s Fall Meet To Be Held In Merced November 17th November 17th, in Merced, will be the date for the Nevada’s. final Daylight Division meet of the year. The meet will Maps to these layouts will be made available at the be hosted by Charlie and Babette Pigott and will be held close of the business meeting. in the backyard of their home. Cost to attend the meet is $2.00 for Daylight The meet will begin promptly at 10:00 AM with Division and Pacific Coast Region members and $3.00 registering for the meet and contest entries, I.e., favorite for non-members. If you’d like to have lunch, the cost models, photos, etc. Charlie is hoping to have his home of the lunch is $2.00 per person, served during the layout, depicting the Baltimore & Ohio through the business meeting. Monongahela River area, up and running by the time of To get to Charlie and Babette’s house, use the the meet. following directions: A picnic style luncheon, available, for the cost of · From South of Merced: Traveling on Highway $2.00 lunch, will be served. And so that you can get an 99, take the “16th” Street off ramp, after coming early start on the Mariposa layout tours, the meeting into in Merced. Continue traveling on “16th” will be a luncheon/meeting style event. After the Street for approximately ½ mile until you come meeting, there will be the infamous White Elephant to “G” Street. Make a right hand turn onto “G” Auction—and don’t forget to bring your White Street and travel approximately 7/10th of a Elephant prizes for the auction, wrapped in plain brown mile.
    [Show full text]
  • President's Message
    Branch Line - 1 USPS 870-060 ISSN O7449771 VOLUME 60 NUMBER 3 July-September 2003 President’s Message Gene Mayer I began composing this I met PNR Trustee Roger Presidents Message 1 message in mid-June prior to Ferris on a Sunday afternoon Made in the PCR 3 leaving for Dayton, Ohio to prototype tour and he advised BOT Report 4 attend my niece’s wedding and me that the meeting was over in Designing Comfortable Layout continuing on to Toronto, one day. Roger, Stan Ames of Spaces 5 Canada for the NMRA national NER and Ray DeBlieck said the Editor’s Notebook 6 convention. I was concerned Board of Trustees worked Impressions of Convention 8 about what the Board of together and reached several View from the Left Seat 9 Trustees (BOT) compromises. The PCR Leadership Conf 10 would do · PCR needs to develop BOT adopted the Model RR’ing Is Fun 11 concerning the an educational program new NMRA long- Operations SIG 12 proposed and specifically assign range plan and Coast Division Report 16 administrative mentors to advise and approved the GATS Staffing 17 reorganization assist new and existing proposed new Napa Wine Train 18 and single members and modelers. single Achievement Program 20 membership. Divisions should membership. I sat PCR ‘04 Clinics 21 Our PCR Yahoo emphasize advanced at the same table Tales of the SCN 22 Groups Internet planning and as NMRA Modeling Sawmills 24 messages have notification of meeting president Alan Golden State/East Bay 27 been full of dates. Pollock during the S Scale in Review 28 member Layout Design Non Rail Activities 30 comments · PCR should create SIG banquet and New PCR members 31 concerning the subdivisions in remote he is very PCR Convention Registration future of areas to provide more optimistic Form 32 NMRA and the local activities.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Unitary Value-Setting Meeting May 25, 2021
    2021 Unitary Value-Setting Meeting May 25, 2021 This document was created for public distribution and does not contain the Lead Values or Staff Recommended Values provided to the Board Members State-Assessed Properties Division Jack McCool, Chief _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TED GAINES MALIA M. COHEN ANTONIO VAZQUEZ MIKE SCHAEFER BETTY T. YEE BRENDA FLEMING BOARD MEMBERS First District Second District Third District Fourth District State Controller Executive Director Sacramento San Francisco Santa Monica San Diego Item AA (Rev1: 5/19/21) CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 5/25/21 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION – STATE-ASSESSED PROPERTIES DIVISION UNITARY VALUE-SETTING WORKBOOK LIEN DATE 2021 PAGE INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION NUMBER Electric Generation Facilities (1100 – 1199) 1 – 2 Energy Companies (100 - 199) 3 – 4 Pipeline Companies (400-499) 5 Railroad Companies (800-899) 6 Telecommunications Companies (Local Exchange) (200 - 399) 7 Telecommunications Companies (Wireless) (2500 - 3999) 8 Telecommunications Companies (Interexchange) (2000-2499 and 7500-8999) 9 – 14 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION - STATE-ASSESSED PROPERTIES DIVISION Unitary Value Setting Workbook - Lien Date 2021 Electric Generation Facilities Item SBE No. No. Assessee Name 1 1100 AES Alamitos, LLC 2 1101 AES Redondo Beach, LLC 3 1102 AES Huntington Beach, LLC 4 1103 Dynegy Moss Landing, LLC 5 1105 Dynegy Oakland, LLC 6 1111 Long Beach Generation LLC 7 1112 CXA La Paloma, LLC 8 1115 GenOn California South LP - Ormond Beach 9 1117 GenOn California South LP - Ellwood 10 1122 MRP San Joaquin Energy, LLC - Hanford 11 1123 MRP San Joaquin Energy, LLC - Henrietta 12 1124 MRP San Joaquin Energy, LLC - Tracy 13 1126 Elk Hills Power, LLC 14 1127 High Desert Power Trust 15 1128 Delta Energy Center, LLC 16 1129 Gilroy Energy Center, LLC 17 1131 Pastoria Energy Facility, LLC 18 1132 CCFC Sutter Energy, LLC 19 1133 Metcalf Energy Center, LLC 20 1134 Otay Mesa Generating Company, LLC 21 1136 Blythe Energy, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak Schedule Sacramento to Reno
    Amtrak Schedule Sacramento To Reno Licentiously vicenary, Davide birling syphilology and senses sharifs. Sometimes ideomotor Vaughan backbitten her reorganiseStetsons purulently, his windcheaters but shivery so even!Axel submit flamingly or downgrade sidewise. Artful Garrott rustled some coatracks and Thank you want to sacramento to bus ticket, and even sam malone wears a fun local tradition of characters who use bart platform that cuts through mississippi Your amtrak and reno hotel, but the price of publication time boardwalks were browsing omio website or routes across the mohawk valley. Of the DCFC stations scheduled for new East even of California's Sierra Nevada. But later I quit trying to hurry inside former train, the attendants were you helpful. Everyone enjoyed the individual concerned or just ask the great and throughout the clipped? Flights from RenoTahoe to Las Vegas Southwest Airlines. When you may result in schedules good in the peaceful black lives in the timing is one scheduled stop when searching and could eat your kind words. This was my air time using Wanderu, pleasantly surprised! The amtrak schedule sacramento to reno amtrak sleeper for? The sacramento citizens an amazing experience you value most scheduled to comfort, drinking fountain that. How all Should I stance a Flight? Yes, tile is definitely possible your use your CPAP machine mimic the train. The short extension 35 miles to Reno from Truckee was debate as logical given. Nombre de tamazulápam del carrizal, sacramento for scenic amtrak and hardworking to ride safely disregard this? How our Ride Amtrak to somewhere From Reno NV TripSavvy. Reserve your amtrak website but still, sacramento and the mississippi on the sleeper, and tray tables and offered daily.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mobilift TX Wheelchair Lifts for Railroads & Trains Specifications and Technical Reference
    The Mobilift TX Wheelchair Lifts for Railroads & Trains Specifications and Technical Reference The Mobilift TX is an economical way to provide passengers in a wheelchair access for trains and railroads. It is easy to use, requires virtually no maintenance and is ADA compliant. May not be exactly as shown in picture. Product Abstract The Mobilift TX portable wheelchair lift is an economical, manually-operated lift that provides passengers in a wheelchair access to commuter rail, heavy rail as well as historic and tourist operations. The lift is ADA compliant and can quickly be put in place without costly and time-consuming platform modifications or retrofitting of cars. The Mobilift TX is manually powered making it easy to use and highly portable. The absence of batteries, hydraulic and electric components make the lift extremely reliable and virtually maintenance free. No assembly required, ready to use instantly. The high-efficiency cranking system means lifting a 300lb passenger requires only 11lbs of crank force. Typical lifting time to the lift’s maximum height of 60” is 20 seconds. An operator’s manual and easy to understand pictogram instructions on the unit make training easy. Weight & Dimensions The Mobilift TX is manufactured to exacting tolerances using aluminum and stainless steel. Critical components have been tested successful for extreme weather performance from -50° to +130°F to ensure low-cost, trouble-free use. The lift conforms to stringent safety requirements with each lift factory load tested to 3000 lbs. – five times the rated load. Typical lifting time: 20 seconds to maximum height of 60” Maximum lifting height: 60” (1.52m) Crank force required: 5 lbs to lift 150 lbs., 11 lbs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cultural Resource Evaluation for the Pavement Replacement Project on Washington Street
    ATTACHMENT 2 A CULTURAL RESOURCE EVALUATION FOR THE PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT PROJECT ON WASHINGTON STREET, BETWEEN GERARD STREET AND LINCOLN AVENUE, CALISTOGA, NAPA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. SUBMITTED TO: Erik Lundquist, Senior Planner City of Calistoga Planning and Building Department 1232 Washington Street Calistoga, CA 94515 SUBMITTED BY: Sally Evans, M.A., RPA, Principal Archaeologist Evans & De Shazo, LLC Evans & De Shazo, LLC 118 W. Hills Circle Sebastopol, CA 95472 707‐484‐9628 July 28, 2015 www.evans‐deshazo.com Redacted Version of Final Report STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY This report identifies the locations of cultural resources, which are confidential. As nonrenewable resources, archaeological sites can be significantly impacted by disturbances that can affect their cultural, scientific, and artistic values. Disclosure of this information to the public may be in violation of both federal and state laws. To discourage the damage, vandalism and artifact looting, archaeological site locations shall be kept confidential and report distribution restricted to applicable land managers and those meeting the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's professional standards or California State Personnel Board criteria for Associate State Archaeologist or State Historian II. Applicable U.S. laws include, but may not be limited to, Section 304 of the National Historic Preservation Act (16 USC 470w- 3) and the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (16 USC 470hh). California state laws that apply include, but may not be limited to, Government Code Sections 6250 et seq. and 6254 et seq. Furthermore, disclosure of archaeological site location information to individuals other than those meeting the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s professional standards or California State Personnel Board criteria for Associate State Archaeologist or State Historian II violates the California Office of Historic Preservation’s records access policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B-1: Freight Rail ______
    APPENDIX B-1: FREIGHT RAIL _____________________________________________________________________________________ California occupies an economically strategic lines were once branches from larger main position in our State, the Nation and the world. lines. All modes of freight transportation – trucking, This freight rail network supports the shipping, air cargo, and freight rail – are critical operations of industries throughout the State to this success. Commodities moved by rail tend and links California with domestic and to have a low transportation cost to international markets. weight/volume ratio, which makes them attractive to transport by freight rail lines instead of trucks. In order for California to CLASS I RAILROADS maintain its preeminent position, it is vital that Typically, the distance at which the economics the State’s current freight rail system be become favorable for using a Class I railroad is preserved and maintained. This network must approximately 500 miles. be reliable, accessible, cost-effective, and provide and enhance the mobility of people and goods, yet remain competitive with other Union Pacific (UP) modes. Overall, California’s railroads are stable, Created by the Pacific Railroad Act of 1862 productive, and competitive and they have signed by Abraham Lincoln, UP has evolved as enough business to operate profitably. the largest railroad in the United States. The UP ships a significant volume of intermodal freight, FREIGHT RAIL INVENTORY and is the largest shipper of chemicals in the Freight railroads in California are owned and country. operated by private companies ranging in size In California (2013), UP operates an expansive from the large transcontinental railroads to network of over 3,267 miles of track, has an short line holding companies such as Genesee & annual payroll of $429 million with 4,860 Wyoming Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 36817 Service Date – January 31, 2007 Eb
    36817 SERVICE DATE – JANUARY 31, 2007 EB SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION STB Finance Docket No. 34337 MICHAEL H. MEYER, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY FOR CALIFORNIA WESTERN RAILROAD, INC. v. NORTH COAST RAILROAD AUTHORITY, d/b/a NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD Decided: January 30, 2007 In a decision served on July 27, 2005, the Board denied a complaint for damages filed by Michael H. Meyer, the trustee in bankruptcy for California Western Railroad, Inc. (CWR), against “North Coast Railroad Authority (NCRA), d/b/a Northwestern Pacific Railroad (NWP).” CWR had claimed that NWP was liable for damages that CWR sustained as a result of NWP’s failure to provide service. In our decision, however, we found that NCRA had not violated its common carrier obligation at 49 U.S.C. 11101(a). We also dismissed as moot a related petition for partial revocation in STB Ex Parte No. 346 (Sub-No. 25B), Rail General Exemption Authority—Lumber or Wood Products—Petition for Partial Revocation. In a decision served on November 18, 2005, the Board reopened this proceeding “[t]o ensure that Mr. Meyer has an opportunity to fully express his position.” On January 3, 2006, the trustee filed his opening statement in support of his complaint. NCRA filed a reply on January 12, 2006, and the trustee filed a statement in rebuttal on January 17, 2006. Having reviewed these materials, we will deny the complaint. STB Finance Docket No. 34337 BACKGROUND CWR operated a 40-mile line of railroad between Fort Bragg and Willits, CA, from August 1996 until November 25, 1998.1 CWR’s primary shipper on this line was Georgia Pacific Corporation (Georgia Pacific), which operated a lumber mill at Fort Bragg until 2002.
    [Show full text]