A Cultural Resource Evaluation for the Pavement Replacement Project on Washington Street

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Cultural Resource Evaluation for the Pavement Replacement Project on Washington Street ATTACHMENT 2 A CULTURAL RESOURCE EVALUATION FOR THE PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT PROJECT ON WASHINGTON STREET, BETWEEN GERARD STREET AND LINCOLN AVENUE, CALISTOGA, NAPA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. SUBMITTED TO: Erik Lundquist, Senior Planner City of Calistoga Planning and Building Department 1232 Washington Street Calistoga, CA 94515 SUBMITTED BY: Sally Evans, M.A., RPA, Principal Archaeologist Evans & De Shazo, LLC Evans & De Shazo, LLC 118 W. Hills Circle Sebastopol, CA 95472 707‐484‐9628 July 28, 2015 www.evans‐deshazo.com Redacted Version of Final Report STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY This report identifies the locations of cultural resources, which are confidential. As nonrenewable resources, archaeological sites can be significantly impacted by disturbances that can affect their cultural, scientific, and artistic values. Disclosure of this information to the public may be in violation of both federal and state laws. To discourage the damage, vandalism and artifact looting, archaeological site locations shall be kept confidential and report distribution restricted to applicable land managers and those meeting the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's professional standards or California State Personnel Board criteria for Associate State Archaeologist or State Historian II. Applicable U.S. laws include, but may not be limited to, Section 304 of the National Historic Preservation Act (16 USC 470w- 3) and the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (16 USC 470hh). California state laws that apply include, but may not be limited to, Government Code Sections 6250 et seq. and 6254 et seq. Furthermore, disclosure of archaeological site location information to individuals other than those meeting the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s professional standards or California State Personnel Board criteria for Associate State Archaeologist or State Historian II violates the California Office of Historic Preservation’s records access policy. Location information regarding aspects of the built environment, including the section of rails evaluated herein, is not restricted. REDACTED VERSION This report has been revised to exclude confidential information. Evans & De Shazo, LLC Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY ....................................................................... I REDACTED VERSION ............................................................................................. I INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................ 1 PROJECT LOCATION ............................................................................................ 1 REGULATORY SETTING ........................................................................................ 3 NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC RESOURCES ................................................................................................... 3 CALIFORNIA REGISTER OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES .............................................................................................. 4 CITY OF CALISTOGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES ...................................................... 5 CULTURAL CONTEXT ........................................................................................... 7 PREHISTORIC SETTING .................................................................................................................................... 7 ETHNOGRAPHIC SETTING ................................................................................................................................ 9 HISTORIC SETTING ....................................................................................................................................... 10 HISTORY OF THE NAPA VALLEY INTERURBAN RAILROAD ..................................................................................... 13 LITERATURE REVIEW ......................................................................................... 25 NATIVE AMERICAN SACRED LANDS INVENTORY ................................................................................................ 27 FIELD SURVEY ................................................................................................... 28 RAILROAD TRACKS ....................................................................................................................................... 28 EVALUATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY INTERURBAN RAILROAD FEATURE ............. 30 NATIONAL REGISTER AND CALIFORNIA REGISTER CRITERIA ................................................................................. 30 CITY OF CALISTOGA'S CULTURAL RESOURCE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES ..................................................... 31 CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................. 32 RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................................... 32 REFERENCES CITED ............................................................................................ 34 Evans & De Shazo, LLC Page ii INTRODUCTION Evans & De Shazo, LLC was contracted by the City of Calistoga to provide a Cultural Resource Evaluation (CRE) for the potential Pavement Replacement Project located within a one-block section of Washington Street between Gerard Street and Lincoln Avenue in the City of Calistoga, Napa County, California. The CRE includes an evaluation of the last remaining 177' long section of the Napa Valley Interurban Railroad following National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) criteria. The purpose of the Cultural Resource Evaluation is to determine (1) if the existing segment of railroad is considered a significant historical resources as defined by California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), (2) the potential for there to be additional cultural resources present that could be adversely affected by the proposed project, and (3) to provide further recommendations if necessary. The methods used to determine the presence or absence of significant cultural resources include archival research, a field survey and application of the NRHP and CRHR criteria. The findings in this report are based on specific guidelines and evaluation criteria of the CRHR (14 CCR §15064.5 and PRC§ 21084.1), the NRHP (36 CFR Part 60.4) and guidelines developed by the City of Calistoga. Evans & De Shazo principal archaeologist Sally Evans, M.A., RPA conducted archival research, surveyed the project area and served as project manager. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project consists of a proposed replacement of existing pavement within a one-block section of Washington Street due to the deterioration that is posing a public safety hazard. The project will entail removing the existing pavement and rail tracks, excavating and replacing 18-24" of road base and soil, and compacting and laying new pavement over the prepared surface. PROJECT LOCATION The Project is located within a section of Washington Street between Gerard Street and Lincoln Avenue in the City of Calistoga, Napa County, California. The Project Area is approximate 240' long and 40' wide. Excavation in order to replace the pavement within this defined area is expected to reach depths ranging from 18-24 inches. In Figure 1, the project area is shown as being located within in the former Mexican era land grant of Carne Human, within unsectioned land of Township 9 North, Range 7 West, extended, Mt. Diablo Base and Meridian. The Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) grid coordinates to the approximate center of the project area, as determined by measurement from the USGS Calistoga 7.5-minute quadrangle map (1958; photo revised 1980 and 1993) are: 4270086 meters North 536716 meters East, Zone 10 Evans & De Shazo, LLC Page 1 Project Area City of Calistoga Public Works Department: J-2015-06-A1-0019: Project Area Washington Street Pavement Replacement Project USGS 7.5' Calistoga quadrangle (1998) Washington Street between Miles Gerald Street and Lincoln Avenue ¯ 00.50.25 Figure 1: Project area as shown on the USGS 7.5' Calistoga quadrangle. Evans & De Shazo, LLC Page 2 REGULATORY SETTING Historical resources are distinguished by features, materials, spaces, and spatial relationships that contribute to their historic character. The project area was evaluated to determine the presence or absence of potentially significant cultural resources, namely those that have the potential to meet the NRHR and/or CRHR criteria. The existing railroad tracks were evaluated to determine eligibility using both the CRHR and NRHP criteria. The five general categories of properties for the NRHP and the CRHR include: Building: A structure created principally to shelter or assist in carrying out any form of human activity. A “building” may also be used to refer to a historically and functionally related unit, such as a courthouse and jail or a house and barn. Structure: A construction made for a functional purpose rather than creating human shelter. Examples include mines, bridges, and tunnels. Object: Construction primarily artist in nature or relatively small in scale and simply constructed. It may be movable by nature or design or made for a specific setting or environment. Objects should be in a setting appropriate to their significant historic use or character. Examples include fountains, monuments, maritime resources, sculptures and boundary markers. Site:
Recommended publications
  • Preliminary Analysis
    SANTA CRUZ BRANCH LINE INTRA-COUNTY RECREATIONAL RAIL OPTIONS Preliminary Analysis Prepared for: Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission Prepared at the direction of: Hyde, Miller, Owen & Trost March 2003 3/23/03 1 Recreational Rail Options – Preliminary Analysis TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………….4 A. Purpose of Study………………………………………………………4 B. Summary of Existing U.S. Recreational Rail Operations………………………………………………………..5 C. Potential for Recreational Rail Operations on the Branch Line………………………………………7 II. POTENTIAL OPERATING SCENARIOS…………………………………8 A. Capitola Village – Aptos Village……………………………………..9 B. Santa Cruz – Capitola Village……………………………………….9 C. Santa Cruz – Davenport…………………………………………….10 D. Santa Cruz – Junction of Highway 1 and Highway 9……………..10 III. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF OPERATING SCENARIOS……………..11 A. Facility Needs and Assumptions……………………………………11 B. Preliminary Economic Forecasts…………………………………...11 1. Capitola Village – Aptos Village……………………………12 Notes to Table 1……………………………………………...13 2. Santa Cruz – Capitola Village………………………………14 3. Santa Cruz – Davenport…………………………………….14 4. Santa Cruz – Junction of Highway 1 and Highway 9……..15 IV. PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS…………………………………………16 3/23/03 2 Recreational Rail Options – Preliminary Analysis LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1. Economic Forecast – Capitola Village to Aptos Village Service………….12 TABLE 2. Economic Forecast – Santa Cruz to Capitola Village Service…………….14 TABLE 3. Economic Forecast – Santa Cruz to Junction of Highway 1 and Highway 9……………………………...….15 3/23/03 3 Recreational Rail Options – Preliminary Analysis I. INTRODUCTION A. Purpose of Study In 2000, the Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission (“Commission”) established itself as the Rail/Trail Authority for the purpose of acquiring and overseeing the future development of, and operations on, the Santa Cruz Branch Line (“Branch Line”).
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 California Rail Adventure Tour
    LINEUP Official Newsletter Of Motorcar Operators West 2015 California Rail Adventure Tour Napa Valley Railroad Western Rail Museum Amador Central Railroad Ardenwood South Pacific Coast Railroad Niles Canyon Railroad Santa Cruz and Monterey Bay Railroad Santa Cruz Big Trees and Pacific Railroad Volume 23, No. 1 Summer 2015 1 Motorcar Operators West Board of Directors Officers and Members Motorcar Operators West Documents Dave Balestreri President Bruce Hilliard 2320 E Street 19 Pebble Court Available at www.mowonline.org Sacramento, CA 95816 Sacramento, CA 95831 H (916) 444-6374 [email protected] C (916) 531-7536 MOW Webmaster [email protected] Karl Hovanitz www.mowonline.org 2110 S Halcyon Road Jamie Foster Jim Culbertson Vice President Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 [email protected] PO Box 221 (805) 481-7353 Courtland, CA 95615 [email protected] NARCOA Rule Book Certification Test H (916) 775-1894 Al McCracken C (209) 483-0903 Lynne Maddy 2916 Taper Avenue Email: [email protected] 1220 16th Street Santa Clara, CA 95051 Los Osos, CA 93402 (408)249-3120 Robert Courtemanche Secretary H (805) 528-5560 [email protected] 5760 Lynx Trail C (805) 704-0607 Pollock Pines, CA 95726 [email protected] Membership Committee Coordinator 530-644-6710 Harry Fisher C530-417-6784 John Martin 28819 Shadow Valley Lane 1360 J Street Santa Clarita, CA 91390 Glen Ford Treasurer Wasco, CA 93280 H (661) 296-0636 PO Box 129 (661) 331-7916 C (661) 733-3084 Rough and Ready, CA 95975 [email protected] Email: [email protected] H (530) 432-5487 C (530) 913-2386 Mike Mitchell Line Up Editor [email protected] PO Box 245 Dan Berg, Editor Guinda, CA 93021 2017 Mule Creek Road Alan Borchardt H (530) 796-2350 Las Vegas, NV 89134 2452 Travis Court C (707) 421-6333 (702) 341-8617 McKinleyville, CA 95519 [email protected] [email protected] H (707) 839-0636 C (707) 601-4335 Dan Berg LINE UP [email protected] Excursion Committee Chairman Volume 23 Number 1 2017 Mule Creek Road Summer 2015 John Haverty Las Vegas, NV 89134 Motorcar Operators West, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • AQ Conformity Amended PBA 2040 Supplemental Report Mar.2018
    TRANSPORTATION-AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT Metropolitan Transportation Commission Association of Bay Area Governments MARCH 2018 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Jake Mackenzie, Chair Dorene M. Giacopini Julie Pierce Sonoma County and Cities U.S. Department of Transportation Association of Bay Area Governments Scott Haggerty, Vice Chair Federal D. Glover Alameda County Contra Costa County Bijan Sartipi California State Alicia C. Aguirre Anne W. Halsted Transportation Agency Cities of San Mateo County San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission Libby Schaaf Tom Azumbrado Oakland Mayor’s Appointee U.S. Department of Housing Nick Josefowitz and Urban Development San Francisco Mayor’s Appointee Warren Slocum San Mateo County Jeannie Bruins Jane Kim Cities of Santa Clara County City and County of San Francisco James P. Spering Solano County and Cities Damon Connolly Sam Liccardo Marin County and Cities San Jose Mayor’s Appointee Amy R. Worth Cities of Contra Costa County Dave Cortese Alfredo Pedroza Santa Clara County Napa County and Cities Carol Dutra-Vernaci Cities of Alameda County Association of Bay Area Governments Supervisor David Rabbit Supervisor David Cortese Councilmember Pradeep Gupta ABAG President Santa Clara City of South San Francisco / County of Sonoma San Mateo Supervisor Erin Hannigan Mayor Greg Scharff Solano Mayor Liz Gibbons ABAG Vice President City of Campbell / Santa Clara City of Palo Alto Representatives From Mayor Len Augustine Cities in Each County City of Vacaville
    [Show full text]
  • North American Models for 2019
    North American Models for 2019 www.lgb.com 1 Get on board and join the fun with LGB! The LGB garden railroad is very durable and a highlight for any garden, no matter the weather. Whether it is Everything you need for endless family fun! branches or flower pots, our © Gebr. Märklin & Cie. GmbH / © Westend61 / Fotolia loadable freight Tank wagons can be filled, car doors can be opened 72403 Freight Train Starter Set and much more! cars can handle it all. The model railroad experience for the entire family! For example: Includes a Vehicle! S For example: 49172 Lehmann Sugar o m s! e d 72426 Freight Train Starter Set Company Car Display se loa ts in nd clude vehicles a Fillable low-side cars! 1. Unpack 2. Assemble Housings are UV-resistant and made of high-impact, 3. Go weather resistant materials. A unique experience for outdoors and indoors. Just unpack the starter set, assemble and let the fun begin! The Building Block Train Starter Set includes a Whether it is fresh water for the plants or Fillable tank wagons! set of 30 building blocks that can be assembled by soil for filling pots, LGB will help you young and old, to suit anyone’s imagination and have big fun in your garden! creativity. Increase the starter set’s play value by adding the Building Block Train Car (94063). Com- 24266 patible with other mass-marketed building blocks. For example: 48401 LGB Tank Car Just what every builder needs! The base plate is an ideal starting point for playing and building.
    [Show full text]
  • Daylight Division's Fall Meet to Be Held in Merced November 17Th
    Volume 15; Issue 4 4th Quarter, 2001 Daylight Division’s Fall Meet To Be Held In Merced November 17th November 17th, in Merced, will be the date for the Nevada’s. final Daylight Division meet of the year. The meet will Maps to these layouts will be made available at the be hosted by Charlie and Babette Pigott and will be held close of the business meeting. in the backyard of their home. Cost to attend the meet is $2.00 for Daylight The meet will begin promptly at 10:00 AM with Division and Pacific Coast Region members and $3.00 registering for the meet and contest entries, I.e., favorite for non-members. If you’d like to have lunch, the cost models, photos, etc. Charlie is hoping to have his home of the lunch is $2.00 per person, served during the layout, depicting the Baltimore & Ohio through the business meeting. Monongahela River area, up and running by the time of To get to Charlie and Babette’s house, use the the meet. following directions: A picnic style luncheon, available, for the cost of · From South of Merced: Traveling on Highway $2.00 lunch, will be served. And so that you can get an 99, take the “16th” Street off ramp, after coming early start on the Mariposa layout tours, the meeting into in Merced. Continue traveling on “16th” will be a luncheon/meeting style event. After the Street for approximately ½ mile until you come meeting, there will be the infamous White Elephant to “G” Street. Make a right hand turn onto “G” Auction—and don’t forget to bring your White Street and travel approximately 7/10th of a Elephant prizes for the auction, wrapped in plain brown mile.
    [Show full text]
  • President's Message
    Branch Line - 1 USPS 870-060 ISSN O7449771 VOLUME 60 NUMBER 3 July-September 2003 President’s Message Gene Mayer I began composing this I met PNR Trustee Roger Presidents Message 1 message in mid-June prior to Ferris on a Sunday afternoon Made in the PCR 3 leaving for Dayton, Ohio to prototype tour and he advised BOT Report 4 attend my niece’s wedding and me that the meeting was over in Designing Comfortable Layout continuing on to Toronto, one day. Roger, Stan Ames of Spaces 5 Canada for the NMRA national NER and Ray DeBlieck said the Editor’s Notebook 6 convention. I was concerned Board of Trustees worked Impressions of Convention 8 about what the Board of together and reached several View from the Left Seat 9 Trustees (BOT) compromises. The PCR Leadership Conf 10 would do · PCR needs to develop BOT adopted the Model RR’ing Is Fun 11 concerning the an educational program new NMRA long- Operations SIG 12 proposed and specifically assign range plan and Coast Division Report 16 administrative mentors to advise and approved the GATS Staffing 17 reorganization assist new and existing proposed new Napa Wine Train 18 and single members and modelers. single Achievement Program 20 membership. Divisions should membership. I sat PCR ‘04 Clinics 21 Our PCR Yahoo emphasize advanced at the same table Tales of the SCN 22 Groups Internet planning and as NMRA Modeling Sawmills 24 messages have notification of meeting president Alan Golden State/East Bay 27 been full of dates. Pollock during the S Scale in Review 28 member Layout Design Non Rail Activities 30 comments · PCR should create SIG banquet and New PCR members 31 concerning the subdivisions in remote he is very PCR Convention Registration future of areas to provide more optimistic Form 32 NMRA and the local activities.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Unitary Value-Setting Meeting May 25, 2021
    2021 Unitary Value-Setting Meeting May 25, 2021 This document was created for public distribution and does not contain the Lead Values or Staff Recommended Values provided to the Board Members State-Assessed Properties Division Jack McCool, Chief _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TED GAINES MALIA M. COHEN ANTONIO VAZQUEZ MIKE SCHAEFER BETTY T. YEE BRENDA FLEMING BOARD MEMBERS First District Second District Third District Fourth District State Controller Executive Director Sacramento San Francisco Santa Monica San Diego Item AA (Rev1: 5/19/21) CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 5/25/21 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION – STATE-ASSESSED PROPERTIES DIVISION UNITARY VALUE-SETTING WORKBOOK LIEN DATE 2021 PAGE INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION NUMBER Electric Generation Facilities (1100 – 1199) 1 – 2 Energy Companies (100 - 199) 3 – 4 Pipeline Companies (400-499) 5 Railroad Companies (800-899) 6 Telecommunications Companies (Local Exchange) (200 - 399) 7 Telecommunications Companies (Wireless) (2500 - 3999) 8 Telecommunications Companies (Interexchange) (2000-2499 and 7500-8999) 9 – 14 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION - STATE-ASSESSED PROPERTIES DIVISION Unitary Value Setting Workbook - Lien Date 2021 Electric Generation Facilities Item SBE No. No. Assessee Name 1 1100 AES Alamitos, LLC 2 1101 AES Redondo Beach, LLC 3 1102 AES Huntington Beach, LLC 4 1103 Dynegy Moss Landing, LLC 5 1105 Dynegy Oakland, LLC 6 1111 Long Beach Generation LLC 7 1112 CXA La Paloma, LLC 8 1115 GenOn California South LP - Ormond Beach 9 1117 GenOn California South LP - Ellwood 10 1122 MRP San Joaquin Energy, LLC - Hanford 11 1123 MRP San Joaquin Energy, LLC - Henrietta 12 1124 MRP San Joaquin Energy, LLC - Tracy 13 1126 Elk Hills Power, LLC 14 1127 High Desert Power Trust 15 1128 Delta Energy Center, LLC 16 1129 Gilroy Energy Center, LLC 17 1131 Pastoria Energy Facility, LLC 18 1132 CCFC Sutter Energy, LLC 19 1133 Metcalf Energy Center, LLC 20 1134 Otay Mesa Generating Company, LLC 21 1136 Blythe Energy, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak Schedule Sacramento to Reno
    Amtrak Schedule Sacramento To Reno Licentiously vicenary, Davide birling syphilology and senses sharifs. Sometimes ideomotor Vaughan backbitten her reorganiseStetsons purulently, his windcheaters but shivery so even!Axel submit flamingly or downgrade sidewise. Artful Garrott rustled some coatracks and Thank you want to sacramento to bus ticket, and even sam malone wears a fun local tradition of characters who use bart platform that cuts through mississippi Your amtrak and reno hotel, but the price of publication time boardwalks were browsing omio website or routes across the mohawk valley. Of the DCFC stations scheduled for new East even of California's Sierra Nevada. But later I quit trying to hurry inside former train, the attendants were you helpful. Everyone enjoyed the individual concerned or just ask the great and throughout the clipped? Flights from RenoTahoe to Las Vegas Southwest Airlines. When you may result in schedules good in the peaceful black lives in the timing is one scheduled stop when searching and could eat your kind words. This was my air time using Wanderu, pleasantly surprised! The amtrak schedule sacramento to reno amtrak sleeper for? The sacramento citizens an amazing experience you value most scheduled to comfort, drinking fountain that. How all Should I stance a Flight? Yes, tile is definitely possible your use your CPAP machine mimic the train. The short extension 35 miles to Reno from Truckee was debate as logical given. Nombre de tamazulápam del carrizal, sacramento for scenic amtrak and hardworking to ride safely disregard this? How our Ride Amtrak to somewhere From Reno NV TripSavvy. Reserve your amtrak website but still, sacramento and the mississippi on the sleeper, and tray tables and offered daily.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mobilift TX Wheelchair Lifts for Railroads & Trains Specifications and Technical Reference
    The Mobilift TX Wheelchair Lifts for Railroads & Trains Specifications and Technical Reference The Mobilift TX is an economical way to provide passengers in a wheelchair access for trains and railroads. It is easy to use, requires virtually no maintenance and is ADA compliant. May not be exactly as shown in picture. Product Abstract The Mobilift TX portable wheelchair lift is an economical, manually-operated lift that provides passengers in a wheelchair access to commuter rail, heavy rail as well as historic and tourist operations. The lift is ADA compliant and can quickly be put in place without costly and time-consuming platform modifications or retrofitting of cars. The Mobilift TX is manually powered making it easy to use and highly portable. The absence of batteries, hydraulic and electric components make the lift extremely reliable and virtually maintenance free. No assembly required, ready to use instantly. The high-efficiency cranking system means lifting a 300lb passenger requires only 11lbs of crank force. Typical lifting time to the lift’s maximum height of 60” is 20 seconds. An operator’s manual and easy to understand pictogram instructions on the unit make training easy. Weight & Dimensions The Mobilift TX is manufactured to exacting tolerances using aluminum and stainless steel. Critical components have been tested successful for extreme weather performance from -50° to +130°F to ensure low-cost, trouble-free use. The lift conforms to stringent safety requirements with each lift factory load tested to 3000 lbs. – five times the rated load. Typical lifting time: 20 seconds to maximum height of 60” Maximum lifting height: 60” (1.52m) Crank force required: 5 lbs to lift 150 lbs., 11 lbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B-1: Freight Rail ______
    APPENDIX B-1: FREIGHT RAIL _____________________________________________________________________________________ California occupies an economically strategic lines were once branches from larger main position in our State, the Nation and the world. lines. All modes of freight transportation – trucking, This freight rail network supports the shipping, air cargo, and freight rail – are critical operations of industries throughout the State to this success. Commodities moved by rail tend and links California with domestic and to have a low transportation cost to international markets. weight/volume ratio, which makes them attractive to transport by freight rail lines instead of trucks. In order for California to CLASS I RAILROADS maintain its preeminent position, it is vital that Typically, the distance at which the economics the State’s current freight rail system be become favorable for using a Class I railroad is preserved and maintained. This network must approximately 500 miles. be reliable, accessible, cost-effective, and provide and enhance the mobility of people and goods, yet remain competitive with other Union Pacific (UP) modes. Overall, California’s railroads are stable, Created by the Pacific Railroad Act of 1862 productive, and competitive and they have signed by Abraham Lincoln, UP has evolved as enough business to operate profitably. the largest railroad in the United States. The UP ships a significant volume of intermodal freight, FREIGHT RAIL INVENTORY and is the largest shipper of chemicals in the Freight railroads in California are owned and country. operated by private companies ranging in size In California (2013), UP operates an expansive from the large transcontinental railroads to network of over 3,267 miles of track, has an short line holding companies such as Genesee & annual payroll of $429 million with 4,860 Wyoming Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 36817 Service Date – January 31, 2007 Eb
    36817 SERVICE DATE – JANUARY 31, 2007 EB SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION STB Finance Docket No. 34337 MICHAEL H. MEYER, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY FOR CALIFORNIA WESTERN RAILROAD, INC. v. NORTH COAST RAILROAD AUTHORITY, d/b/a NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD Decided: January 30, 2007 In a decision served on July 27, 2005, the Board denied a complaint for damages filed by Michael H. Meyer, the trustee in bankruptcy for California Western Railroad, Inc. (CWR), against “North Coast Railroad Authority (NCRA), d/b/a Northwestern Pacific Railroad (NWP).” CWR had claimed that NWP was liable for damages that CWR sustained as a result of NWP’s failure to provide service. In our decision, however, we found that NCRA had not violated its common carrier obligation at 49 U.S.C. 11101(a). We also dismissed as moot a related petition for partial revocation in STB Ex Parte No. 346 (Sub-No. 25B), Rail General Exemption Authority—Lumber or Wood Products—Petition for Partial Revocation. In a decision served on November 18, 2005, the Board reopened this proceeding “[t]o ensure that Mr. Meyer has an opportunity to fully express his position.” On January 3, 2006, the trustee filed his opening statement in support of his complaint. NCRA filed a reply on January 12, 2006, and the trustee filed a statement in rebuttal on January 17, 2006. Having reviewed these materials, we will deny the complaint. STB Finance Docket No. 34337 BACKGROUND CWR operated a 40-mile line of railroad between Fort Bragg and Willits, CA, from August 1996 until November 25, 1998.1 CWR’s primary shipper on this line was Georgia Pacific Corporation (Georgia Pacific), which operated a lumber mill at Fort Bragg until 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Lionel Layout – a Labor of Love
    Volume 38, No. 4 April, 2009 The New Lionel Layout – a Labor of Love The Lion Roars April, 2009 Bold and Cold A Frosty yet Friendly Invitation to Find your Way to this Car. This detailed model of a 57-foot BNSF mechanical reefer was First-time-ever added features by LCCA include: an on/off designed by the LCCA and made by Lionel® according to club specs. indicator light for the onboard diesel refrigeration unit, It’s available to club members as a memento of the upcoming 2009 a simulated load of boxes of California grapes Convention in Sacramento, California. The dramatic metallic white inside the car, a posed delivery man at the door, pearl paint and high-gloss finish suggests that the car is “frozen” as ice-blue-painted trucks, and the city of Sacramento indicated by the roof-edge icicles and the “Ice Cold Express” slogan. logo on both sides of the car. This car bears the design features of its class: LCCA members who collect club • Brake equipment positioned low on one end Convention cars will want to add this special • Short ladders product to their cache, and BNSF niche • Metal (not plastic) floor collectors will want this “cool and different” item! • Modern roof with no running board • Sliding compartment door reveals the onboard diesel engine NOTE: This car may become an essential • Die-cast metal sprung trucks with rotating bearing caps piece in a possible future Lionel release bearing • Operating couplers with hidden uncoupler tabs this distinctive décor scheme. A whispered word to • Metal underframe detail the wise collector – order this car now! • Opening doors.
    [Show full text]