I Learning to Live Together: Humanism and Education

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

I Learning to Live Together: Humanism and Education Learning to Live Together: humanism and education after the postcolonial challenges Stephen Eric Chatelier ORCID: 0000-0003-4819-4214 Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2016 Melbourne Graduate School of Education University of Melbourne i Abstract The idea of humanism has a long history in philosophies of education. Within the Western philosophical traditions, humanism has assumed different forms, often in response to the shifting historical conditions. It has provided a basic template for envisioning educational goals, and for the kind of individuals and society education is expected to produce. In more recent decades, humanism as a philosophical construct has, however, been the subject of criticisms from a wide range of political and disciplinary perspectives. Such criticisms have arisen from a variety of sources, including structuralism, post-structuralism, feminist, environmental and animal studies. One of the more distinctive criticisms has emerged from postcolonial theorists. These theorists have suggested that while humanism was often portrayed as a liberating project, it in fact served as a driving force behind colonial oppression itself. In colonial education, it legitimized the construction of colonial relations. Postcolonial theories have challenged this role performed by humanism. A question emerges then as to whether this implies a rejection of humanism itself. This thesis engages in a critical analysis of the challenges that three major postcolonial theorists – Frantz Fanon, Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak and Edward Said – pose to the viability and desirability of humanism. After constructing an historical account of humanism and its connections to education within Western traditions, it briefly explores some of the contemporary debates about humanism as a construct. It then suggests that in different ways and to varying degrees, Fanon, Spivak and Said, in their prioritizing of the lived experience of the subaltern, keep open the possibility, and desirability, of humanism as a matter of justice. They do not thus entirely abandon humanism, but suggest the need to rearticulate its meaning and significance so that it is used as a moral resource with which to negotiate the shifting conditions of cultural difference and exchange. The thesis contends therefore that the conditions of globalization have made the idea of humanism more relevant and urgent than ever. Rather than making grand claims or guarantees about its success, this thesis makes the more modest argument that a humanism emerging from the postcolonial challenges needs to be treated as a dynamic notion whose meaning is rearticulated through on-going dialogue and negotiations within and across communities. Education has a major role to play in this, in developing the conversational skills and moral dispositions that enable us to live together, despite our differences. ii Declaration This thesis comprises only my original work towards the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, and due acknowledgement has been made in the text to all other material used. The thesis is fewer than 100,000 words in length, exclusive of tables, bibliography and appendices. _________________________ Stephen Eric Chatelier iii Acknowledgements I have a great sense of the privilege it has been to enjoy such a wonderful education over many years. These past few years, in which I have been engaged in the PhD, are ones for which I will be forever grateful. I would like to thank my supervisors, Professor Fazal Rizvi and Dr Dianne Mulcahy. I have been so privileged to enjoy the company of two people who not only exhibit intellects of the highest calibre, but a generosity of spirit, time and friendship. Di, I’ll cherish the hallway conversations about posthumanism and the ad-hoc lessons you provided me on the “new materialists”. Fazal, across the countless lunches we have had together, often talking about my project, but also about a vast array of matters, you have simultaneously embodied my critic, mentor, champion and friend. I thank the both of you for the time and energy you have given, and for the unwavering support you have shown for me as an emerging scholar. To my fellow students and colleagues in the Melbourne Graduate School of Education who have offered me friendship and who have enriched and challenged my thinking along the way – in particular Dr Sophie Rudolph, Dr Jessica Gerrard, Ajita Mattoo, Dr Glen Savage, Rosie Barron, Professor Julie McLeod, Ranjit Nadarajah, Dr Peter Woelert and Professor Stephen Crump – I offer you my sincere thanks. To my fellow traveller and dear friend, Nima Sobhani: thanks for your words of encouragement, for challenging me, for sharing the journey with me. Undertaking a PhD full-time with a young family assured that I would be reliant on the sacrifice of others to get the work done. For the many years of support, and for the recent unwavering willingness to assist with child care, I’d like to thank my parents Anita and David. I am also grateful that my father offered to undertake the painstaking task of proof-reading every single word! For making yourselves available to assist with the children for intensive periods while I engaged in self-imposed writing “boot-camps”, I thank my parents-in-law, Jillian and Howard. There are numerous other friends and family members to whom I am grateful, though I could not begin to name them here. I am especially indebted to my long-suffering wife, Anouchka. Not only did you increase your involvement and responsibilities in managing “the Res” to allow me the time to complete this project, you did so while also assuming more than your fair share of responsibility for our children. Your love for, and belief in, me is not only deeply appreciated but reciprocated. To my precious children – Malachi, Eloise and Jude: this thesis has been completed with you in mind. It is my hope that the world you contribute to, and leave behind, will be more just and more humane than the one you inherited. iv Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................................ ii Declaration .......................................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................. iv Chapter 1: Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2: Humanism and education in the West ............................................................................. 21 From Ancient Greece to Modern Europe............................................................................................ 22 Humanisms and education in Western history: (dis)continuities ........................................................ 28 Humanism’s continuing legacy as an ethico-political resource ........................................................... 35 Chapter 3: Humanism: recent challenges .......................................................................................... 42 Poststructuralism and the critique of humanism ................................................................................. 44 Feminism and the critique of humanist universalism .......................................................................... 49 Anthropocentrism, animals, antihumanism and the Anthropocene .................................................... 53 Summing up the challenges faced by humanism ............................................................................... 59 Colonial Travel of Humanism: an excursus into the spatial turn ......................................................... 64 The spatial turn, (post)colonialism and humanism ............................................................................. 70 Approach to analysis .......................................................................................................................... 71 Chapter 4: Frantz Fanon ...................................................................................................................... 81 Biographical sketch: a journey from colonial formation to colonial recognition ................................... 82 Colonial humanism ............................................................................................................................. 89 Existential phenomenology, humanism and lived experience ............................................................ 93 The struggle for an emergent humanism............................................................................................ 99 Chapter 5: Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak ............................................................................................ 106 The politics of postcolonial theory .................................................................................................... 107 Gender, subalternity and the unrepresentability of woman .............................................................. 112 Marx, Spivak and deconstruction ..................................................................................................... 120 Spivak on Derrida on Marx ............................................................................................................... 123 The Specter of Humanism ...............................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • I Letter on Humanism
    i i I I I i v LETTER ON HUMANISM ~ To think is to confine yourself to a single thought that one day stands still like a star in the world's sky. Letter on Humanism 191 nature that would guarantee the rightness of his choice and the efficacy of his action. "There is reality only in action," Sartre in­ sists (p. 55), and existentialism "defines man by action" (p. 62), which is to say, "in connection with an engagement" (p. 78). Nevertheless, Sartre reaffirms (pp. 64 ff.) that man's freedom to act is rooted in subjectivity, which alone grants man his dignity, so that the Cartesian cogito becomes the only possible In Brussels during the spring of 1845, not long after his expul­ point de depart for existentialism and the only possible basis for sion from Paris, Karl Marx jotted down several notes on the a humanism (p. 93). German philosopher Ludwig Feuerbach. The second of these Heidegger responds by keeping open the question of action reads: "The question whether human thought achieves objective but strongly criticizing the tradition of subjectivity, which cele­ truth is not a question of theory but a practical question.... Dis­ brates the "I think" as the font of liberty. Much of the "Letter" pute over the actuality or nonactuality of any thinking that is taken up with renewed insistence that Dasein or existence is isolates itself from praxis is a purely scholastic question." Ever and remains beyond the pale of Cartesian subjectivism. Again since that time-especially in France, which Marx exalted as the Heidegger writes Existenz as Ek-sistenz in order to stress man's heart of the Revolution-the relation of philosophy to political "standing out" into the "truth of Being." Humanism underes­ practice has been a burning issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Timothy Hampton
    Hampton 1 Curriculum Vitae -- Timothy Hampton Coordinates Department of Comparative Literature, Department of French 4125 Dwinelle Hall #2580 University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 (510) 642-2712 [email protected] Website: www.timothyhampton.org Employment 2017- Director, Doreen B. Townsend Center for the Humanities, UC Berkeley 1999-Present. Professor of French, and Comparative Literature (“below the line” appointment in Italian Studies), University of California, Berkeley 2014-ongoing. Holder of the Aldo Scaglione and Marie M. Burns Distinguished Professorship, UC Berkeley 2007-2011, Holder of the Bernie H. Williams Chair of Comparative Literature 1990-1999. Associate Professor of French, U.C. Berkeley 1986-1990. Assistant Professor of French, Yale University, New Haven, CT Visiting Positions 2019 (spring) Visiting Professor, University of Paris 8, Paris, France 2001 (spring) Comparative Literature, Stanford University 1994 (fall) French and Italian, Stanford University 1999 (summer) French Cultural Studies Institute, Dartmouth College Education Ph. D., Comparative Literature, Princeton University, 1987 M.A., Comparative Literature, University of Toronto, 1982 B.A., French and Spanish, University of New Mexico, summa cum laude, 1977 Languages Spanish, French, Italian, Latin, Portuguese, German, some Old Provençal, English Fellowships and Honors Fellow of the Institut d'Études Avancées, Paris (2014-15) Associate Researcher, Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, Paris, May-June 2015. Cox Family Distinguished Fellow in the Humanities, University of Colorado (2014) Campus Distinguished Teaching Award, UC Berkeley (2013) Hampton 2 Major Grant, Institute for International Education, UC Berkeley, "Diplomacy and Culture." 2012-13. Founding Research Network Member, Cambridge/Oxford University project on "Textual Ambassadors." 2012- (With Support from the Humanities Council of the UK).
    [Show full text]
  • "The Philosophy of Humanism"
    THE PHILOSOPHY OF HUMANISM Books by Corliss Lamont The Philosophy of Humanism, Eighth Edition, 1997 (posthumous) Lover’s Credo: Poems of Love, 1994 The Illusion of Immortality, Fifth Edition, 1990 Freedom of Choice Affirmed, Third Edition, 1990 Freedom Is as Freedom Does: Civil Liberties in America, Fourth Edition, 1990 Yes To Life: Memoirs of Corliss Lamont, 1990 Remembering John Masefield, 1990 A Lifetime of Dissent, 1988 A Humanist Funeral Service, 1977 Voice in the Wilderness: Collected Essays of Fifty Years, 1974 A Humanist Wedding Service, 1970 Soviet Civilization, Second Edition, 1955 The Independent Mind, 1951 The Peoples of the Soviet Union, 1946 You Might Like Socialism, 1939 Russia Day by Day Co-author (with Margaret I. Lamont), 1933 (Continued on last page of book) THE PHILOSOPHY OF HUMANISM CORLISS LAMONT EIGHTH EDITION, REVISED HALF-MOON FOUNDATION, INC. The Half-Moon Foundation was formed to promote enduring inter- national peace, support for the United Nations, the conservation of our country’s natural environment, and to safeguard and extend civil liberties as guaranteed under the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. AMHERST, NEW YORK 14226 To My Mother FLORENCE CORLISS LAMONT discerning companion in philosophy Published 1997 by Humanist Press A division of the American Humanist Association 7 Harwood Drive, P.O. Box 1188 Amherst, NY 14226-7188 Eighth Edition Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 96-77244 ISBN 0-931779-07-3 Copyright © 1949, 1957, 1965, 1982, 1990, 1992 by Corliss Lamont. Copyright © 1997 by Half-Moon Foundation, Inc. Copy Editor, Rick Szykowny ~ Page Layout, F. J. O’Neill The following special copyright information applies to this electronic text version of The Philosophy of Humanism, Eighth Edition: THIS DOCUMENT IS COPYRIGHT © 1997 BY HALF-MOON FOUNDATION, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • RICHARD DAWKINS Ends All Debate
    RICHARD DAWKINS Ends All Debate Celebrating Reason and Humanity WINTER 2002/03 • VOL. 23 No. 1 f Susan HAACK • Christopher HITCHENS Nat HENTOFF Peter SINGER Paul KURTZ • • Introductory Price $5.95 U.S. / $6.95 Can. 24> John Dewey and Sidney Hook Remembered 7725274 74957 Published by The Council for Secular Humanism THE AFFIRMATIONS OF HUMANISM: A STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES* We are committed to the application of reason and science to the understanding of the universe and to the solving of human problems. We deplore efforts to denigrate human intelligence, to seek to explain the world in supernatural terms, and to look outside nature for salvation. We believe that scientific discovery and technology can contribute to the betterment of human life. We believe in an open and pluralistic society and that democracy is the best guarantee of protecting human rights from authoritarian elites and repressive majorities. We are committed to the principle of the separation of church and state. We cultivate the arts of negotiation and compromise as a means of resolving differences and achieving mutual understanding. We are concerned with securing justice and fairness in society and with eliminating discrimination and intolerance. We believe in supporting the disadvantaged and the handicapped so that they will be able to help themselves. We attempt to transcend divisive parochial loyalties based on race, religion, gender, nationality, creed, class, sexual orientation, or ethnicity, and strive to work together for the common good of humanity. We want to protect and enhance the earth, to preserve it for future generations, and to avoid inflicting needless suffering on other species.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanism and Early Modern Philosophy Edited by Jill Kraye and M.W.F.Stone
    London Studies in the History of Philosophy Series Editors: Jonathan Wolff, Tim Crane, M.W.F.Stone and Tom Pink London Studies in the History of Philosophy is a unique series of tightly focused edited collections. Bringing together the work of many scholars, some volumes will trace the history of the formulation and treatment of a particular problem of philosophy from the Ancient Greeks to the present day, while others will provide an in-depth analysis of a period or tradition of thought. The series is produced in collaboration with the Philosophy Programme of the University of London School of Advanced Study. 1 Humanism and Early Modern Philosophy Edited by Jill Kraye and M.W.F.Stone Forthcoming 2 Proper Ambition of Science Edited by M.W.F.Stone and Jonathan Wolff Humanism and Early Modern Philosophy Edited by Jill Kraye and M.W.F.Stone London and New York First published 2000 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2003. © 2000 Jill Kraye and M.W.F.Stone All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Humanism and early modern philosophy/[edited by] Jill Kraye and M.W.F.Stone.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Cincinnati
    UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI Date:___________________ I, _________________________________________________________, hereby submit this work as part of the requirements for the degree of: in: It is entitled: This work and its defense approved by: Chair: _______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________ Musical Rhetoric in the Multi-Voice Chansons of Josquin des Prez and His Contemporaries (c. 1500-c. 1520) A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Division of Composition, Musicology and Theory of the College-Conservatory of Music By VASSILIKI KOUTSOBINA B.S., Chemistry University of Athens, Greece, April 1989 M.M., Music History and Literature The Hartt School, University of Hartford, Connecticut, May 1994 Committee Chair: Dr. Stephanie P. Schlagel 2008 ABSTRACT The first quarter of the sixteenth century witnessed tightening connections between rhetoric, poetry, and music. In theoretical writings, composers of this period are evaluated according to their ability to reflect successfully the emotions and meaning of the text set in musical terms. The same period also witnessed the rise of the five- and six-voice chanson, whose most important exponents are Josquin des Prez, Pierre de La Rue, and Jean Mouton. The new expanded textures posed several compositional challenges but also offered greater opportunities for text expression. Rhetorical analysis is particularly suitable for this repertory as it is justified by the composers’ contacts with humanistic ideals and the newer text-expressive approach. Especially Josquin’s exposure to humanism must have been extensive during his long-lasting residence in Italy, before returning to Northern France, where he most likely composed his multi- voice chansons.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Program
    Sixteenth Century Society & Conference Montréal 2010 2009-2010 OFFICERS President: Jeffrey R. Watt Vice-President: Cathy Yandell Past-President: Amy Nelson Burnett Executive Director: Donald J. Harreld Financial Officer: Eric Nelson ACLS Representative: Allyson M. Poska Endowment Chairso: Raymond Mentzer & Ronald Fritze COUNCIL Class of 2010: Walter S. Melion, Jeannine Olson, Allyson Poska, Randall Zachmann Class of 2011: Peter Marshall, Elisabeth Wåghäll Nivre, Katherine McIver, Michael Walton Class of 2012: Kathryn Edwards,o Emidio Campi, Sheila ffolliott, Allison Weber PROGRAM COMMITTEE Chair: Cathy Yandell History: Sigrun Haude English Literature: Scott Lucas German Studies: Bethany Wiggin Italian Literature: Meredith Ray Theology: R. Ward Holder History of Science: Bruce Janacek French Literature: Jean-Claude Carron Spanish and Latin American Studies: Elizabeth Lehfeldt Art History:o Cynthia Stollhans NOMINATING COMMITTEE Emmet McLaughlin (Chair), Torrance Kirby, Mary B. McKinley, Bruceo Gordon, Pia Cuneo 2009–2010 SCSC PRIZE COMMITTEES Gerald Strauss Book Prize Ronald K. Rittgers, Amy Leonard, Timothy Fehler Bainton Art History Book Prize Lynette Bosch, James Clifton, Naomi Yavneh Bainton History/Theology Book Prize Christopher Ocker, Andrew Spicer, Kathryn Edwards Bainton Literature Book Prize Christopher Baker, Julia Griffin, Cynthia Skenazi Bainton Reference Book Prize John Farthing, Ronald Fritze, Konrad Eisenbichler Grimm Prize Roy Vice, Charles Parker, Peter Wallace Roelker Prize Megan Armstrong, Karen Spierling, Jeffrey R.
    [Show full text]
  • Music of the New Lusitania: the Impact of Humanist Thought on Polyphony in Sixteenth-Century Portugal
    ABSTRACT Title of Thesis: MUSIC OF THE NEW LUSITANIA: THE IMPACT OF HUMANIST THOUGHT ON POLYPHONY IN SIXTEENTH-CENTURY PORTUGAL Victor Amaro Vicente, Master of Arts, 2006 Thesis Directed By: Professor Richard Wexler School of Music, University of Maryland Cosmopolitan, politically influential, and wealthy, Portugal experienced its “Golden Age” in the sixteenth century. Though science and the arts reached their apogee during this era, polyphonic music in Portugal does not seem to have flourished to any great extent before the seventeenth century. The few extant examples of secular court polyphony, in particular, demonstrate a predominantly homorhythmic style possibly cultivated by amateur composers. This aesthetic favoring simpler musical textures likely developed from the humanist notion that music must serve the text. Italian humanism, in fact, had a profound impact on Renaissance Portugal, which claimed its ancient Roman name, Lusitania. In literature and art the influence is quite apparent, but the case for music requires a more detailed study that is sensitive to broader social factors. This study argues that the composition and performance of Renaissance Portuguese court music is best understood within the context of the Counter-Reformation and Christian humanism. MUSIC OF THE NEW LUSITANIA: THE IMPACT OF HUMANIST THOUGHT ON POLYPHONY IN SIXTEENTH-CENTURY PORTUGAL by Victor Amaro Vicente Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts 2006 Advisory Committee: Professor Richard Wexler, Chair Professor Robert C. Provine Professor Barbara Haggh-Huglo © Copyright by Victor Amaro Vicente 2006 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS “Muito obrigado” is meager recompense for the great many people who have helped me at every stage of this project, but my gratitude is heartfelt.
    [Show full text]
  • Partial Pulfillment of the Requirements : .; Va , for the Degree of '
    Humanism at the University of Paris in the early Renaissance Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Marcus, Leslie Bennett, 1937- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 06/10/2021 10:37:22 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/318965 HUMMFISM If THE UHYEHSITI OF PffilS IH THE EIRIZ RENHSSfflGE Xeslie B. Marcus A Thesis Sutaitted to the Faculty of the BEPAETMENT OF EOMMGE IfflGUAGES I»; Partial Pulfillment of the Requirements : .; Va , For the Degree of ' . MISTER OP- iRTS • In the Graduate College ' : :.HIIflRSlfI W iRIZCEA . ' 1 9 6 2 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of re­ quirements for an advanced degree at the University of Arizona and is deposited in the University library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in their judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: ^ . Ytaurvujl APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: LOYAL A.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Countries Edition
    Key Countries Edition THE FREEDOM OF THOUGHT REPORT 2016 Key Countries Edition Freedom of Thought 2016: A Global Report on Discrimination Against Humanists, Atheists, and the Non-religious; Their Human Rights and Legal Status, was created by the International Humanist and Ethical Union (IHEU). The International Humanist and Ethical Union is the worldwide democratic body for Humanist, atheist, rationalist, secular, ethical culture, and freethought organizations. Its mission is to represent and support the global Humanist movement, and to build a world in which human rights are respected and all can live a life of dignity. If you have updates, additions or corrections for the report please email [email protected] or visit the website at freethoughtreport.com. To receive updates and news from IHEU, or join as a supporter, visit iheu.org. The cover image features a detail from a map produced using the data from this report. These maps depict the findings of the full Freedom of Thought Report which is available in a complete Online Edition at freethoughtreport.com. They represent each of the four thematic strands of the Report: Constitution & Government, Education & Children’s Rights, Society & Community, and Freedom of Expression & Advocacy of Humanist Values. Grave Violations Severe Discrimination Systemic Discrimination Mostly Satisfactory Free and Equal No Rating Preface to the 2016 edition By Andrew Copson Andrew Copson is President of the International Humanist and Ethical Union (IHEU) Published by the International Humanist and Ethical Union (IHEU), the Freedom of Thought Report is now in its fifth annual edition. In 2012, our first edition was an expanded version of a submission by several of the IHEU’s US Member Organizations to the US State Department Office for International Religious Freedom, and covered around 60 countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft History of HGP Editor's Footnote: I
    Draft History of HGP Editor’s Footnote: I have created a separate document listing all the different boards as far back as I could. I only added a new board from the newsletters when there was a change. Currently, (March, 2018) I have 29 different board configurations between May, 1996, and October, 2015, though many earlier newsletters have yet to be reviewed. I don't know when HGP was chartered, but AHA could probably tell you. Note: I contacted them years ago now, and asked if they could tell me, but I never got a reply— to two separate queries. One of the situations here is that we have very little institutional memory, and that's something we should be addressing somehow. In the short run, perhaps, every officer should serve for two years, and only half the board positions should be new each year. That would certainly help with continuity. We should also keep some log of decisions, probably culled from the board minutes, so we know at any time what the current policies might be, separate from bylaws. For example, years ago the board authorized three members For example, there were concerns about members taking the HGP banner (not the one at the front of the room every Sunday, but one with our full title on it). Some members didn't always want us in all parades and at all gatherings with the banner, suggesting that the presence of the banner meant that the people were there with some official stance. I suggested an option: have a banner that says “Members of The Humanists of Greater Portland” as one option.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanist Narratology and the Suburban Ensemble Dramedy
    Humanist Narratology and the Suburban Ensemble Dramedy Wyatt Moss-Wellington A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of: Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences University of Sydney 2017 DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY This is to certify that to the best of my knowledge, the content of this thesis is my own work. This thesis has not been submitted for any degree or other purposes. I certify that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work and that all the assistance received in preparing this thesis and sources have been acknowledged. Wyatt Moss-Wellington 2 ABSTRACT What is a “humanistic drama”? Although we might describe narrative works as humanist, and references to the humanistic drama abound across a breadth of critical media, including film and literary theory, the parameters of these terms remain elliptical. My work attempts to clarify the narrative conditions of humanism. In particular, humanists ask how we use narrative texts to complicate our understanding of others, and question the ethics and efficacy of attempts to represent human social complexity in fiction. After historicising narrative humanism and situating it among related philosophies, I develop humanist hermeneutics as a method for reading fictive texts, and provide examples of such readings. I integrate literary Darwinism, anthropology, cognitive science and social psychology into a social narratology, which catalogues the social functions of narrative. This expansive study asks how we can unite the descriptive capabilities of social science with the more prescriptive ethical inquiry of traditional humanism, and aims to demonstrate their productive compatibility.
    [Show full text]