DOCSLIB.ORG

Electoral Mediation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Lesotho and Kenya: a Comparative Perspective by Victor Shale and Robert Gerenge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Electoral Mediation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Lesotho and Kenya: a Comparative Perspective by Victor Shale and Robert Gerenge ISSUE 4, 2016 Editorial focus: The challenges of our planet demand leadership that is visionary, bold and strong Electoral Security Challenges DDR The Women’s Al Mahdi’s Colonial Mediation Structures in of Liberal in the DRC Situation Case before Legacy of in the DRC, Europe and Peace and Room in the ICC Civil-military Lesotho and Lessons from Statebuilding Africa Relations and Kenya APSA in Divided Democratic Stability in In this Issue: Societies West Africa CONTENTS EDITORIAL 2 by Vasu Gounden FEATURES 3 Electoral Mediation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Lesotho and Kenya: A Comparative Perspective by Victor Shale and Robert Gerenge 11 Developing Security Structures in Europe: Lessons Learned from the African Peace and Security Architecture by Floris van der Beek 18 Challenges of Liberal Peace and Statebuilding in Divided Societies by Christopher Zambakari 26 Disarmament, Demobilisation and Reintegration in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: Can Stability Prevail? by Kitenge Fabrice Tunda 33 The Women’s Situation Room in Africa: An Initiative for Peaceful and Inclusive Elections by Irene Limo 42 Al Mahdi’s Case before the International Criminal Court: A Landmark Decision in the Protection of Cultural and Religious Sites by Frédéric Foka Taffo 50 The Colonial Legacy of Civil-military Relations and Democratic Stability in West Africa by Naila Salihu Cover photo: Malians vote at a polling station in the Ecole de la République in Bamako, Mali, during the presidential election (28 July 2013). UN Photo/Marco Dormino conflict trends I 1 EDITORIAL BY VASU GOUNDEN The year 2016 will be remembered as a watershed year challenged by “people’s power” and mainstream religion the world over. It presented many surprises and upstaged was challenged by alternative religious persuasions. many political pundits. In Europe, many were shocked Fear of what was expected in the future triumphed by the exit of Britain from the European Union – better over the hope that dominated the last 25 years. Prophets known as Brexit. In South Africa, power changed hands of doom have had fertile ground to plough and plant the in key local government structures, putting the opposition seeds of fear and hatred. In many ways, we are witnessing in charge of the legislative, administrative and financial the demise of liberalism and democracy and the rise of capitals of the country and dislodging the long-established conservatism and authoritarianism. The forces that will liberation movement and current ruling party of South shape the world over the next 25 years can either plunge Africa, the African National Congress (ANC). A few years the world into a plethora of closed enclaves characterised ago, this result would have been unthinkable. The year by strict laws restricting the movement of people, goods ended with what must be one of the greatest political and services, or they can build a world on the globalised upsets ever: the defeat of Hillary Clinton by Donald Trump planet we have shaped over the last 25 years. for the powerful position of president-elect of the United Historical periods dominated by liberalism and States (US). Trump will be inaugurated as the US president democracy or conservatism and authoritarianism are not on 20 January 2017, in what appears to be a very divided new. However, what is new is a planet with seven billion country. people, the majority of whom are urbanised and living in While surprising at the time they occurred, all these close proximity to each other, either physically or through events (among many others) can, in retrospect, be traced social media. This phenomenon challenges our ability to to the ever-growing disenchantment with the current co-exist and cooperate for mutual benefit. Perhaps this is a governing establishment globally. This is remarkable, juncture in the history of humanity where neither liberalism because the world is in one of its most prosperous nor conservatism, neither democracy nor authoritarianism periods, largely due to the significant positive changes will suffice. Maybe this is a time for leaders who are able that have occurred in the last 25 years since the end of to take the best from these ideologies and who are able the cold war. During this time, dictatorships made way to transcend identity, manage complexity, lead with new for democracies, the rule of law replaced the abuse of vision and inspiration, build bridges between people in power, wars and conflicts de-escalated significantly, creative ways, and promote order and stability. This is women gained more empowerment than in any other certainly a time for leadership that is visionary, bold and time in history, science and technology entered an era of strong, yet caring and benevolent. The challenges of our unimaginable possibilities, and millions around the world planet – and this moment in time – demand no less. started to enjoy a better standard of living. However, these 25 years have also seen the growth of terrorism; human, drug and arms trafficking; a rise in racial and ethnic divisions and discrimination; the growth Vasu Gounden is the Founder and Executive Director of ACCORD. of inequality to dangerous proportions; and a steady rise in unemployment and poverty in many developed and developing countries. These trends were coupled with a drop in public confidence in the establishments of government and religion. Mainstream governments were 2 I conflict trends ELECTORAL MEDIATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO, LESOTHO AND KENYA: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE BY VICTOR SHALE AND ROBERT GERENGE UN PHOTO/MYRIAM ASMANI Introduction (2005 and 2008), Zambia (2015 and 2016), Côte d’Ivoire The history of elections in Africa shows that the continent (2010), Guinea (2015) and Uganda (2016) – to mention a has made significant strides in ensuring that regular few. In the majority of these cases, the political elite have multiparty elections replace unconventional mechanisms been accused of manipulating the electoral process in their of seizure of political power. Increasingly, elections have favour. Consequently, the electoral environment in most become highly competitive for the political parties, and countries has become more complex in terms of democracy candidates fight for the apparent social and economic gains and governance, amidst high demands from citizens for accrued from the state. Regrettably for citizens of many greater participation and accountable governance. In their countries on the continent, regular elections in Africa have continued search for alternative leaders to deliver the social not translated into the anticipated dividends of democracy – and economic dividends of governance, political leaders in which was ushered with much hope in the early 1990s. Instead, there have been cases of election-related conflicts – Above: The history of elections in Africa shows that the as witnessed in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) continent has made significant strides in ensuring that (2006 and 2011), Lesotho (1998 and 2007), Burundi (2016), regular multiparty elections replace unconventional Kenya (1992, 1997 and 2007), Madagascar (2007), Zimbabwe mechanisms of seizure of political power. conflict trends I 3 10°E 15°E CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC 25°E Obo 30°E SOUTH SUDAN 5°N Bangassou 5°N Bangui Yambio Juba DEMOCRATIC Berbérati Mobaye Torit Gbadolite Bondo Ango Dakwa Mbaïki N O R D - Libenge B AS-U É L É Dungu Faradje REPUBLIC OF Nola U B ANG I Uélé Gemena Businga Likati HAU T - THE CONGO SUD - Buta Isiro U É L É Watsa U B ANG I Gulu ala ong i Budjala M g Lisala Bumba Wamba n a UGANDA b U o MONGA L A Ituri Oyem Ouésso Impfondo ng Bagbunda Bunia EQUATORIAL i o or u C Lop i Bongandanga Basoko Mambasa Lake g i Lake GUINEA n Aruwu m Bafwasende Kyoga a Basankusu I T U R I Albert b nga u ulo Makokou O L Kisangani Libreville É QUA T E U R Befale Beni Kampala Jinja Ilungu T SHOP O Kasese GABON Mbandaka Maringa Butembo 0° CONGO Busira Boende Lubero 0° Tsh Ubundu Owando uapa N O R D - Lake Port- Ingende Bokungu Opala L Edward Lambaréné u Lubutu KIV U Lake Ewo Sa a Gentil lon L l Koulamoutou ga om a Rutshuru Victoria Lukolela e Ikela b la a Punia Franceville T SHUAP A Goma Bukoba Musoma Mouila Lac RWANDA Inongo ndi Lac Uli Kivu Kigali Djambala Mai-Ndombe Lomela Bukavu Kutu MAI - Shabunda Mwanza Tchibanga Kindu Mushie NDOM B E Katako- Luke SUD-KIV U nie Dekese Lodja Kombe MANI E M A Bujumbura Sibiti Kagulube Bandundu Kas Kibombo Uvira K ai SANKU R U BURUNDI w Lodi Sa Dolisie Brazzaville i nk l ur Fizi Kinshasa u u Kasongo SA Pointe- A H Masi-Manimba Pene- S Kenge Noire Luozi KIN K W I L U Idiofa Lusambo Mende Kigoma 5°S Kikwit Tabora 5°S Cabinda KONGO CENTRAL Mbanza- Demba Lubao Kongolo (ANGOLA) Ngungu uga Boma Matadi Gungu KASA I Mbuji- L OMAM I uk Kabalo L Kalemie Feshi Mayi Kabinda ATLANTIC M’banza Congo Tshikapa Kananga Niemba UNITED Kasongo- Ka L sa KASAI Makena T ANGANYIK A a REPUBLIC i L k OCEAN Lunda C E N T R A L u e a OF KASAI l K K W ANG O a Moba T Luiza b Manono a w ORIENTAL Lu a n a v TANZANIA n u g Uíge g Kaniama a Pepa a o n y Sumbawanga National capital i HAU T - L OMAM I Molira k District capital Lucapa Kapanga Pweto a Lake Rukwa Caxito City, town Luanda Kamina L U A L A B A Mbeya Bukama Major airport L Lake N’dalatando u lu Musabira Mweru International boundary Malanje Saurimo a HAU T - Province boundary 10°S ANGOLA Lubudi K A T ANG A Kasama 10°S Main road DEMOCRATIC Mutshatsha Kolwezi Kasenga REPUBLIC OF THE Dilolo M Secondary road Likasi CONGO L a A Railroad Sumbe k e L ze Lubumbashi Luena be M m A 0 100 200 300 km a a Z io l R W a Kuito w 0 100 200 mi Solwezi i Huambo The boundaries and names shown and the designations used I Sakania on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE ELECTORAL PROCESS and DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE in LESOTHO Lessons for the Democratic Republic of the Congo
    VOLUME 2 NO 1 77 THE ELECTORAL PROCESS AND DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE IN LESOTHO Lessons for the Democratic Republic of the Congo By Khabele Matlosa Dr Khabele Matlosa is Director of the Research and Policy Studies Programme of the Southern African Political Economy Series (SAPES) Trust, 4 Deary Avenue, Belgravia, Harare, Zimbabwe Tel: +263 4252962; Fax: +263 4252964; e-mail: [email protected] INTRODUCTION After long years of authoritarian rule, marked, in the main, by either civilian or military dictatorship, all the member states of the Southern African Development Community (SADC) have embraced multi-party democratic governance. Although much progress has been made in a majority of the regional states towards nurturing and consolidating democratic governance, fairly slow progress is still manifest in the case of three SADC member-states, namely Angola, The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Swaziland. It is not difficult to understand and explain the rather disappointing record of democratisation in these three states. The main problem in both Angola and the DRC is largely the protracted violent conflict that has characterised them, although it appears now that the prospect of successfully settling these intra-state disputes is fairly bright. Swaziland is steeped in a traditionalism that has entrenched a dynastic form of governance in which the King, as an executive monarch, is central to the running of national affairs. This constitutes a critical democratic deficit for the country. One important ingredient of democratic consolidation in the SADC region is the holding of regular multi-party elections. It should, however, be noted right from the start that an election does not amount to democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Political Parties and Party Politics On
    EXPLORING THE ROLE OF POLITICAL PARTIES AND PARTY SYSTEMS ON DEMOCRACY IN LESOTHO by MPHO RAKHARE Student number: 2009083300 Submitted in the fulfilment of the requirements for the Magister Degree in Governance and Political Transformation in the Programme of Governance and Political Transformation at the University of Free State Bloemfontein February 2019 Supervisor: Dr Tania Coetzee TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages DECLARATION .................................................................................................................................... 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 5 List of abbreviations and acronyms ................................................................................................... 6 LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................. 8 Chapter 1 ............................................................................................................................................... 9 Introduction to research ....................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Motivation ........................................................................................................................................ 9 1.2 Problem statement .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Multiparty Democracy and Elections in Namibia
    MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA ––––––––––––– ❑ ––––––––––––– Published with the assistance of NORAD and OSISA ISBN 1-920095-02-0 Debie LeBeau 9781920 095024 Edith Dima Order from: [email protected] EISA RESEARCH REPORT No 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 i MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA ii EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 iii MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA BY DEBIE LEBEAU EDITH DIMA 2005 iv EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 Published by EISA 2nd Floor, The Atrium 41 Stanley Avenue, Auckland Park Johannesburg, South Africa 2006 P O Box 740 Auckland Park 2006 South Africa Tel: 27 11 482 5495 Fax: 27 11 482 6163 Email: [email protected] www.eisa.org.za ISBN: 1-920095-02-0 EISA All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of EISA. First published 2005 EISA is a non-partisan organisation which seeks to promote democratic principles, free and fair elections, a strong civil society and good governance at all levels of Southern African society. –––––––––––– ❑ –––––––––––– Cover photograph: Yoruba Beaded Sashes Reproduced with the kind permission of Hamill Gallery of African Art, Boston, MA USA EISA Research Report, No. 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 v CONTENTS List of acronyms viii Acknowledgements x Preface xi 1. Background to multiparty democracy in Namibia 1 Historical background 1 The electoral system and its impact on gender 2 The ‘characters’ of the multiparty system 5 2.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critique of Proceduralism in the Adjudication of Electoral Disputes in Lesotho
    VOLUME 17 NO 2 DOI: 10.20940/JAE/2018/v17i2aDOI: 10.20940/JAE/2018/v17i2a1 1 1 A CRITIQUE OF PROCEDURALISM IN THE ADJUDICATION OF ELECTORAL DISPUTES IN LESOTHO Hoolo ‘Nyane Hoolo ‘Nyane is Associate Professor and Head of Public and Environmental Law, School of Law, University of Limpopo ABSTRACT One of the characteristic features of electoral democracy in Lesotho is dis- puted elections. Since 1993, when the country returned to constitutional democracy after a long haul of dictatorship and monarcho-military rule, every election has been subjected to one form of discontent or another. The aggrieved parties use various ways to vent their dissatisfactions, and more often than not, disputes end up in the courts of law. The courts are then called on to determine the validity or otherwise of the election results de- clared by the election management body. All seven elections since 1993 have been challenged in the courts of law. Despite this determination by political players in Lesotho to resolve electoral disputes through the courts of law, amongst other means, there is no court in Lesotho that has over- turned an election result or ordered the reallocation of seats since 1993. The petitions are almost invariably dismissed on procedural grounds or on the basis of misapplication of the substantial effect doctrine. This approach to the adjudication of disputes in Lesotho has not only jeopardised substan- tive electoral justice in the country but has also arguably perpetuated the electoral violence that has been one of the characteristic features of electoral politics in Lesotho. The purpose of this article, therefore, is to critique this approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern African Charter on Land, Labour and Food Security
    The African e-Journals Project has digitized full text of articles of eleven social science and humanities journals. This item is from the digital archive maintained by Michigan State University Library. Find more at: http://digital.lib.msu.edu/projects/africanjournals/ Available through a partnership with Scroll down to read the article. Afr. j. polit. sci. (1997), Vol. 2 No. 1, 140-151 The 1993 Elections in Lesotho and The Nature of the BCP Victory Khabele Matlosa* Introduction Almost without exception, African states are undergoing a profound policy shift informed by the twin processes of economic adjustment and political liberalisation (Gibbon et. al, 1992; Chole and Ibrahim, 1995; Mkandawire and Olukoshi, 1995; Baylies, 1995; Clapham, 1995). Although both are driven by the two powerful international financial institutions — the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank — and various Western bilateral donors, the latter is also the result of endogenous factors within these states, especially after the collapse of the bi-polar world order in 1990 (Mkandawire, 1995 : 82). Nonetheless, economic adjustment has been regarded by the donor community in general as a necessary condition for the transition from authoritarian rule to multi-party democracy. This explains in part the tendency by donors to recommend that these two processes be imple- mented in tandem; and political liberalisation is now perceived by donors as a critical conditionality for continued development assistance to African states. (Ninsin 1993 : 5). Lesotho, a small, landlocked and impoverished state in Southern Africa is not an exception to this post-Cold War rule of thumb that governs current relations between donor and recipient countries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lesotho General Election of 1998
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by IDS OpenDocs The Lesotho General Election of 1998 Pontso Sekatle* Analysis of elections is an important exercise in political science. Because of this all previous elections in Lesotho were analysed. The 1998 elections were followed by controversy that brought the country> to the brink of anarchy and civil war. Some political parties claimed that the elections were rigged. This was not the first time such claims were made after an election in Lesotho. Since 1965 alt Lesotho elections have been conducted peacefully. However, the reaction of some losers has always been negative. The aftermath of the 1998 elections almost plunged the country into an unprecedended state of civil war. But this was an election declared free and fair by local and international observers. The majority of political parties that contested the elc.tions also concluded that the elections were free and fair. This paper sets out to analyse the May’ 1998 elections. It argues that despite the time constraint faced by the Independent Electoral Commission the election went fairly smoothly and allowed the electorate to vole freely for the government of their choice. The paper shows that political parties had almost the same shopping list of campaign issues; selection of candidates for major political parties was controversial to the extent that some contestants had to seek redress from the courts of law. Introduction The second democratic elections since the end of military rule in Lesotho was held on 23 May 1998. The election outcome a landslide victory for the ruling Lesotho Congress for Democracy (LCD).1 The LCD won 79 out of 80 constituencies.2 The election was declared free and fair.
    [Show full text]
  • Africa's Unresponsive Democratization: the Relationship Between Regime Type and the Quality of Life in Africa Caryn Anne Peiffer Claremont Graduate University
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CGU Theses & Dissertations CGU Student Scholarship 2012 Africa's Unresponsive Democratization: the Relationship between Regime Type and the Quality of Life in Africa Caryn Anne Peiffer Claremont Graduate University Recommended Citation Peiffer, Caryn Anne, "Africa's Unresponsive Democratization: the Relationship between Regime Type and the Quality of Life in Africa" (2012). CGU Theses & Dissertations. Paper 29. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgu_etd/29 DOI: 10.5642/cguetd/29 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the CGU Student Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in CGU Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Africa’s Unresponsive Democratization: the Relationship between Regime Type and the Quality of Life in Africa by Caryn Anne Peiffer Claremont Graduate University 2012 © Copyright Caryn Peiffer, 2012 All rights reserved. Approval of the Review Committee This dissertation has been duly read, reviewed, and critiqued by the Committee listed below, which hereby approves the manuscript of Caryn Peiffer as fulfilling the scope and quality requirements for meriting the degree of Ph. D. of Political Science. Pierre Englebert, Chair Pomona College Professor Jennifer Merolla Claremont Graduate University Associate Professor Yi Feng Claremont Graduate University Professor Abstract Africa’s Unresponsive Democratization: the Relationship between Regime Type and the Quality of Life in Africa by Caryn Peiffer Claremont Graduate University: 2012 Scholars and policy makers alike argue that leaders of democracies should find it in their interest to provide high levels of social services due to a fear of being voted out of office.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Models for South Africa: Reflections and Options
    Electoral Models for South Africa: Reflections and Options Electoral Task Team Review Roundtable 9–10 September 2002 Vineyard Hotel, Cape Town South Africa KONRAD ADENAUER FOUNDATION • SEMINAR REPORT • JOHANNESBURG • MAY 2003 © KAS, 2003 All rights reserved While copyright in this publication as a whole is vested in the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, copyright in the text rests with the individual authors, and no paper may be reproduced in whole or part without the express permission, in writing, of both authors and the publisher. It should be noted that any opinions expressed are the responsibility of the individual authors and that the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung does not necessarily subscribe to the opinions of contributors. Published by: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung 60 Hume Road Dunkeld 2195 Johannesburg Republic of South Africa PO Box 1383 Houghton 2041 Johannesburg Republic of South Africa Telephone: (+27 +11) 214-2900 Telefax: (+27 +11) 214-2913/4 E-mail: [email protected] www.kas.org.za Editing, DTP and production: Tyrus Text and Design Reproduction: Rapid Repro Printing: Stups Printing Table of contents List of tables vii List of abbreviations ix Preface xi DAY ONE, FIRST SESSION ELECTORAL OPTIONS AND CORE VALUES 1 Opening remarks 3 Dr Frederik Van Zyl Slabbert The Konrad Adenauer Foundation 5 Michael Plesch Welcoming address 7 The Honourable Minister, Dr Mangosuthu Buthelezi Shared aspirations: The imperative of accountability in 15 South Africa’s electoral system Dr Wilmot James & Dr Adrian Hadland Panel contributions 27 Adv Pansy Tlakula, Dr Athaliah Molokomme and Dr Pallo Jordan Questions and answers on electoral options and core values 35 Electoral options and core values: A summary 41 Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiparty Elections in Africa's New Democracies
    Multiparty elections in Africa’s new democracies Lise Rakner and Lars Svåsand Report R 2002: 7 Chr. Michelsen Institute Development Studies and Human Rights CMI Reports This series can be ordered from: Chr. Michelsen Institute P.O. Box 6033 Postterminalen, N-5892 Bergen, Norway Tel: + 47 55 57 40 00 Fax: + 47 55 57 41 66 E-mail: [email protected] Web/URL:http//www.cmi.no Price: NOK 50 ISSN 0805-505X ISBN 82-8062-016-8 Indexing terms Elections Electoral systems Political parties Voting Sub-Saharan Africa Zambia © Chr. Michelsen Institute 2002 CMI Contents Introduction 1 Part 1: Elections in Africa’s new democracies: Structures, actors and attitudes 2 1.1 The electoral structures of African democracies 3 The effects of electoral formulas in sub-Saharan Africa 5 The administration of elections 7 1.2 The nature of African parties and party systems 10 Explaining the weakness of African political parties 11 The link between electoral structures and party strength 13 1.3 Behaviour and attitudes of the African electorate 14 Attitudes to democracy 15 Part 2: Experiences with multiparty elections in Zambia 17 2.1 Administering elections in Zambia 1991-2001 18 The rules guiding the Zambian elections 18 Electoral management 18 Voter registration 19 The election campaigns 21 Interpreting the results of the 2001 elections 22 2.2 The role of political parties and election campaigns in Zambia 23 Party developments in Zambia 1991-1996 23 Party developments in Zambia 1996-2001 24 The link between party system and the electoral structures 25 Explaining the weakness of political parties in Zambia 26 Part 3: The role of the donor community in the electoral processes 26 ’Election fixation’ among donors? 27 What should donors do? 28 References 30 Appendix 1 34 CMI Introduction After a short wave of euphoric expectations of what multiparty democracy could accomplish for Africa in terms of political accountability, economic development and peace, the current perception both internationally and within sub-Saharan Africa appear to be pessimistic.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Journal [PDF]
    Journal of African Elections Articles by Khabele Matlosa Carl W Dundas Sean Jacobs Terhi Lehtinen Tom Lodge David Pottie Françoise Kaudjhis - Offoumou Vicky da Silva Published by the Electoral Institute of Southern Africa 41 Stanley Avenue, The Atrium, 2nd floor, Auckland Park, South Africa PO Box 740, Auckland Park, South Africa Tel: +27 11 482 5495; Fax: +27 11 482 6163 ©Copyright EISA 2001 ISSN: 1609-4700 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the written permission of the publisher. Design and layout by EISA http://www.eisa.org.za Editors David Pottie (Managing Editor) Tom Lodge (Managing Editor) Claude Kabemba (Managing Editor) Editorial Board David Caroll, Democracy Program, The Carter Center, Atlanta Jorgen Elklit, Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, Copenhagen Amanda Gouws, Department of Political Science, University of Stellenbosch, Cape Town Dumisani Hlophe, Centre for Policy Studies, Johannesburg Sean Jacobs, Institute for Democracy in South Africa, Cape Town Denis Kadima, National Democratic Institute for International Affairs, Windhoek Peter Katjavivi, University of Namibia, Windhoek Andrew Kiondo, Department of Political Science, University of Dar es Salaam Khabele Matlosa, Southern African Regional Institute for Policy Studies, Harare Robert Mattes, Institute for Democracy in South Africa, Cape Town Achille Mbembe, Council for the Development
    [Show full text]
  • Lesotho, Malawi, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, Swaziland, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe
    CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND TO THE SADC PARLIAMENTARY FORUM The Southern African Development Community Parliamentary Forum was established in 1996 in accordance with Article 9 (2) of the SADC Treaty as an autonomous institution of SADC. It is a regional inter-parliamentary body composed of twelve parliaments representing over 1,800 parliamentarians in the SADC region. These member parliaments are Angola, Botswana, Lesotho, Malawi, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, Swaziland, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe. The objectives of the Forum include the promotion of multi-party democracy, good governance and political stabil- ity in the region as well as respect of the rule of law, human rights and fundamental freedoms. In line with the above objectives, the Forum has taken a keen interest in election observation in its member states. In this regard, the Forum has observed elections in Namibia and Mozambique in 1999, in Zimbabwe, Mauritius and Tanzania in 2000, in Zambia in 2001 and in Zimbabwe in 2002 (presidential election). Based on its two first years of observation and related-activities, the Forum developed and adopted Electoral Norms and Standards for the SADC region in March 2001, which serve as benchmarks against which it assesses the management and the conduct of electoral processes in the region. The Electoral Norms and Standards also provide a gender checklist for free and fair elections, which is aimed at mainstreaming gender at different stages of an election. Subsequent general elections in the region, namely, in Zambia (2001) and Zimbabwe (2002) were assessed on the basis of those Electoral Norms and Standards, as was the 2002 Lesotho National Assembly elections.
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Trends and Challenges of Electoral Democracy in Africa
    Emerging Trends and Challenges of Electoral Democracy in Africa International IDEA Policy Dialogue 25–27 May 2016 Abuja, Nigeria www.idea.int Emerging Trends and Challenges of Electoral Democracy in Africa International IDEA Policy Dialogue 25–27 May 2016 Abuja, Nigeria © 2016 International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance International IDEA Strömsborg SE–103 34 STOCKHOLM SWEDEN Tel: +46 8 698 37 00, fax: +46 8 20 24 22 Email: [email protected], website: www.idea.int The electronic version of this publication is available under a Creative Commons (CC) Attribute-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 licence. You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the publication as well as to remix and adapt it provided it is only for non- commercial purposes, that you appropriately attribute the publication, and that you distribute it under an identical licence. For more information on this licence see <http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/>. International IDEA publications are independent of specific national or political interests. Views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the views of International IDEA, its Board or its Council members. Graphic design by International IDEA Contents Executive summary ............................................................................... 4 Introduction ........................................................................................10 Opening session .................................................................................12 Keynote address .................................................................................15
    [Show full text]