DOCSLIB.ORG

The Impact of Political Parties and Party Politics On

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Impact of Political Parties and Party Politics On EXPLORING THE ROLE OF POLITICAL PARTIES AND PARTY SYSTEMS ON DEMOCRACY IN LESOTHO by MPHO RAKHARE Student number: 2009083300 Submitted in the fulfilment of the requirements for the Magister Degree in Governance and Political Transformation in the Programme of Governance and Political Transformation at the University of Free State Bloemfontein February 2019 Supervisor: Dr Tania Coetzee TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages DECLARATION .................................................................................................................................... 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 5 List of abbreviations and acronyms ................................................................................................... 6 LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................. 8 Chapter 1 ............................................................................................................................................... 9 Introduction to research ....................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Motivation ........................................................................................................................................ 9 1.2 Problem statement ...................................................................................................................... 14 1.3 Aims and objectives of the study ............................................................................................... 21 1.4 Research methodology ............................................................................................................... 22 1.5 Research design .......................................................................................................................... 23 Chapter 2 ............................................................................................................................................. 24 Theoretical framework ....................................................................................................................... 24 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 24 2.2 The doctrine of separation of powers ....................................................................................... 25 2.3 Separation of powers in branches of government .................................................................. 29 2.3.1 Legislative authority ................................................................................................................. 29 2.3.2 Executive authority ................................................................................................................... 30 2.3.3 Judiciary authority .................................................................................................................... 31 2.4 Parliamentary, presidential and semi-presidential systems .................................................. 34 2.4.1 Parliamentary system .............................................................................................................. 34 2.4.1.1 Advantages of the parliamentary system ...................................................................... 37 2.4.1.2 Disadvantages of the parliamentary system ................................................................. 37 2.4.2 The presidential system .......................................................................................................... 37 2.4.2.1 Advantages of the presidential system .......................................................................... 39 2.4.2.2 Disadvantages of the presidential system .................................................................... 40 2.4.3 Comparison between the presidential and parliamentary systems .................................. 40 2.4.4 Semi-presidential system ........................................................................................................ 41 2.4.4.1 Advantages of the semi-presidential system ................................................................ 44 2.4.4.2 Disadvantages of the semi-presidential system ........................................................... 44 2.5 Military intervention in a state .................................................................................................... 45 1 2.6 Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 48 Chapter 3 ............................................................................................................................................. 49 Theoretical framework of political parties and party system on democracy ............................. 49 3.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 49 3.2 Representative democracy ........................................................................................................ 49 3.3 Political parties and party systems ............................................................................................ 51 3.4 Functions of political parties ....................................................................................................... 53 3.5 Party systems types .................................................................................................................... 55 3.5.1 One-party system ..................................................................................................................... 55 3.5.1.1 Advantages of the one-party system ............................................................................. 56 3.5.1.2 Disadvantages of the one-party system ........................................................................ 57 3.5.2 One party dominance .............................................................................................................. 57 3.5.2.1 Advantages of the party dominant system .................................................................... 58 3.5.2.2 Disadvantages of the party dominant system............................................................... 58 3.5.3 The two-party system .............................................................................................................. 59 3.5.3.1 Advantages of the two-party system .............................................................................. 59 3.5.3.2 Disadvantages of the two-party system ........................................................................ 60 3.5.4 The multi-party system ............................................................................................................ 60 3.5.4.1 Advantages of the multi-party system ............................................................................ 61 3.5.4.2 Disadvantages of the multi-party system ...................................................................... 61 3.6 Democratic elections ................................................................................................................... 61 3.6.1 Functions of elections .............................................................................................................. 63 3.6.2 Elements of elections ............................................................................................................... 64 3.6.3 Election violence ....................................................................................................................... 64 3.7 Electoral system ........................................................................................................................... 66 3.7.1 Types of electoral systems ..................................................................................................... 70 3.7.1.1 The First-Past-the-Post (FPTP) System ............................................................................ 70 3.7.1.1.1 Advantages of the FPTP system ................................................................................. 71 3.7.1.1.2 Disadvantages of the FPTP system ........................................................................... 72 3.7.1.2 The Proportional Representation (PR) system ................................................................ 72 3.7.1.2.1 Advantages of the PR system ..................................................................................... 73 3.7.1.2.2 Disadvantages of the PR system ................................................................................ 74 3.7.1.3 The Mixed Member Proportional (MMP) system ............................................................. 74 3.7.1.3.1 Advantages of the MMP system .................................................................................. 75 2 3.7.1.3.2 Disadvantages of the MMP system ............................................................................ 76 3.8 Coalition governments ................................................................................................................ 76 3.8.1 Classical coalition governments ............................................................................................. 77 3.8.2 Consociational coalition governments
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Implementation of Quotas: African Experiences Quota Report Series
    The Implementation of Quotas: African Experiences Quota Report Series Edited by Julie Ballington In Collaboration with This report was compiled from the findings and case studies presented at an International IDEA, EISA and SADC Parliamentary Forum Workshop held on 11–12 November 2004, Pretoria, South Africa. © International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance 2004 This is an International IDEA publication. International IDEA publications are independent of specific national or political interests. Views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the views of International IDEA, its Board or its Council members. Applications for permission to reproduce or translate all or any part of this publication should be made to: Information Unit International IDEA SE -103 34 Stockholm Sweden International IDEA encourages dissemination of its work and will promptly respond to requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications. Graphic design by: Magnus Alkmar Cover photos: Anoli Perera, Sri Lanka Printed by: Trydells Tryckeri AB, Sweden ISBN: 91-85391-17-4 Preface The International Institute for Democracy and a global research project on the implementation and Electoral Assistance (IDEA), an intergovernmental use of quotas worldwide in cooperation with the organization with member states across all continents, Department of Political Science, Stockholm University. seeks to support sustainable democracy in both new By comparing the employment of gender quotas in dif- and long-established democracies. Drawing on com- ferent political contexts this project seeks to gauge parative analysis and experience, IDEA works to bolster whether, and under what conditions, quotas can be electoral processes, enhance political equality and par- implemented successfully. It also aims to raise general ticipation and develop democratic institutions and awareness of the use of gender quotas as an instrument practices.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ELECTORAL PROCESS and DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE in LESOTHO Lessons for the Democratic Republic of the Congo
    VOLUME 2 NO 1 77 THE ELECTORAL PROCESS AND DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE IN LESOTHO Lessons for the Democratic Republic of the Congo By Khabele Matlosa Dr Khabele Matlosa is Director of the Research and Policy Studies Programme of the Southern African Political Economy Series (SAPES) Trust, 4 Deary Avenue, Belgravia, Harare, Zimbabwe Tel: +263 4252962; Fax: +263 4252964; e-mail: [email protected] INTRODUCTION After long years of authoritarian rule, marked, in the main, by either civilian or military dictatorship, all the member states of the Southern African Development Community (SADC) have embraced multi-party democratic governance. Although much progress has been made in a majority of the regional states towards nurturing and consolidating democratic governance, fairly slow progress is still manifest in the case of three SADC member-states, namely Angola, The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Swaziland. It is not difficult to understand and explain the rather disappointing record of democratisation in these three states. The main problem in both Angola and the DRC is largely the protracted violent conflict that has characterised them, although it appears now that the prospect of successfully settling these intra-state disputes is fairly bright. Swaziland is steeped in a traditionalism that has entrenched a dynastic form of governance in which the King, as an executive monarch, is central to the running of national affairs. This constitutes a critical democratic deficit for the country. One important ingredient of democratic consolidation in the SADC region is the holding of regular multi-party elections. It should, however, be noted right from the start that an election does not amount to democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Statement by the Family of Lt General Maaparankoe Mahao on Sadc Report: 16 February 2016, Maseru, Lesotho
    PRESS STATEMENT BY THE FAMILY OF LT GENERAL MAAPARANKOE MAHAO ON SADC REPORT: 16 FEBRUARY 2016, MASERU, LESOTHO Lt General Maaparankoe Mahao’s family has had the opportunity to study Justice Mphaphi Phumaphi Commission of Inquiry Report. As all of us will remember, the Commission was established by SADC to investigate the circumstances surrounding the death of General Mahao and the alleged mutiny against the current leadership of the Lesotho Defence Force (LDF). The Report was endorsed by the SADC Double Troika at its Summit held in Gaborone, Botswana on 18th January, 2016 with an injunction on the Lesotho Government to publish it and implement it. Lt General Mahao’s family once again wishes to express its gratitude to SADC for its efforts in the search for lasting peace and stability in the Kingdom of Lesotho and, in particular, to SADC’s unwavering commitment to get to the bottom of how and why Lt General Mahao was killed on 25th June, 2015. We further express our sincere appreciation of the thorough and professional work carried out by Justice Phumaphi’s Commission of Inquiry in the discharge of its mandate. We are fully aware of the very difficult conditions under which the Commission operated; especially the obstructions it encountered from some with vested interest to have the truth forever buried. Two principal objectives were at the heart of SADC’s decision to establish the Commission of Inquiry. These were the death of Lt General Mahao and the alleged mutiny within the ranks of the LDF. Around the death of Lt General Mahao, some significant progress was made in so far as the Commission ascertained certain facts which dispel and lay to rest the false claims made by the LDF with regards to why he was killed.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiparty Democracy and Elections in Namibia
    MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA ––––––––––––– ❑ ––––––––––––– Published with the assistance of NORAD and OSISA ISBN 1-920095-02-0 Debie LeBeau 9781920 095024 Edith Dima Order from: [email protected] EISA RESEARCH REPORT No 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 i MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA ii EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 iii MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA BY DEBIE LEBEAU EDITH DIMA 2005 iv EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 Published by EISA 2nd Floor, The Atrium 41 Stanley Avenue, Auckland Park Johannesburg, South Africa 2006 P O Box 740 Auckland Park 2006 South Africa Tel: 27 11 482 5495 Fax: 27 11 482 6163 Email: [email protected] www.eisa.org.za ISBN: 1-920095-02-0 EISA All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of EISA. First published 2005 EISA is a non-partisan organisation which seeks to promote democratic principles, free and fair elections, a strong civil society and good governance at all levels of Southern African society. –––––––––––– ❑ –––––––––––– Cover photograph: Yoruba Beaded Sashes Reproduced with the kind permission of Hamill Gallery of African Art, Boston, MA USA EISA Research Report, No. 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 v CONTENTS List of acronyms viii Acknowledgements x Preface xi 1. Background to multiparty democracy in Namibia 1 Historical background 1 The electoral system and its impact on gender 2 The ‘characters’ of the multiparty system 5 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications for Consolidation of Democracy in Lesotho by Libuseng Malephane
    Contesting and turning over power: Implications for consolidation of democracy in Lesotho By Libuseng Malephane Afrobarometer Policy Paper No. 17 | February 2015 Introduction Since its transition to electoral democracy in 1993, Lesotho has experienced a series of upheavals related to the electoral process. Election results were vehemently contested in 1998, when the ruling Lesotho Congress for Democracy (LCD) won all but one of the country’s constituencies under a first-past-the-post electoral system, and a military intervention by the Southern African Development Community (SADC) was required to restore order. A mixed member proportional (MMP) model introduced in the run-up to the 2002 general elections resulted in more parties being represented in Parliament. The MMP model also led to the formation of informal coalitions as political parties endeavoured to maintain or increase their seats in Parliament in the 2007 elections (Kapa, 2007). Using a two-ballot system, with one ballot for constituency and another for the proportional-representation (PR) component, the elections preserved the ruling LCD’s large majority in Parliament and precipitated another protracted dispute between the ruling and opposition parties over the allocation of PR seats. Mediation efforts by the SADC and the Christian Council of Lesotho led to a review of the Constitution and Electoral Law. The resulting National Assembly Electoral Act of 2011 provides for a single-ballot system that allows voters to indicate their preferences for both constituency and PR components of the MMP system (UNDP, 2013). Meanwhile, the new All Basotho Convention (ABC), which had broken away from the LCD in 2006, became the largest opposition party in Parliament after the 2007 elections.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy and Political Governance in Lesotho: Key Issues and Challenges
    DEMOCRACY AND POLITICAL GOVERNANCE IN LESOTHO: KEY ISSUES AND CHALLENGES By Khabele Matlosa* Background Paper prepared on behalf of the APRM Secretariat, Midrand, Johannesburg 7th August 2006 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................................... 3 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 4 2. SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONTEXT..................................................................................................... 6 2.1. RESOURCE ENDOWMENT.............................................................................................................. 6 2.2. UNEMPLOYMENT, POVERTY & HIV/AIDS................................................................................... 7 2.3. EXTERNAL ECONOMIC RELATIONS .............................................................................................. 8 2.4. IMPLICATIONS FOR GOVERNANCE................................................................................................ 9 3. BACKGROUND TO APRM AND LESOTHO’S PREPARATORY STAGES.......................... 12 3.1. STAGE ONE: PREPARATION......................................................................................................... 14 3.2. STAGE TWO: COUNTRY REVIEW VISITS ..................................................................................... 14 3.3. STAGE THREE: REVIEW TEAM REPORT .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FOL Newsletter 3QTR
    Metsoalle ea Lesotho Friends of Lesotho Third Quarter 2014 Newsletter Newsletter Features Clickable Links!! Download the newsletter from the FOL FOL President Appointed website www.friendsoflesotho.org and you will be able to click on all the Honorary Consul website addresses. Friends of Lesotho President Scott Rosenberg was appointed Honorary Consul by the Lesotho Embassy in Washington, DC. He will represent Lesotho in Ohio and the Midwest and help facilitate greater cooperation between the two countries to promote Lesotho’s trade, tourism, investment, and cultural activities to Ameri- cans, and he will also assume protocol responsibilities for visiting Basotho dignitaries. The current Ambassador to the US, serving in the Washington DC consulate, is Ambassador Molapi Sepetane. Scott Rosenberg (R) with Lesotho Minister of Protocol Moshuli Leteka, Summer 2014, Maseru. Photo Credit: Thabo Moseunyane Was There a Coup or Not? By Ella Kwisnek, RPCV 92-94, Lesotho Agricultural College, [email protected] A quarterly newsletter is not an ideal place for fast-breaking news, so thanks to RPCV Ella Kwis- nek for compiling this log of events that made front pages on world newspapers during August and Sept 2014. ~ Ed. What happened? On Saturday, August 30, 2014, there was a reported “coup d'état attempt by the military” in Lesotho. Soldiers reportedly disarmed police and one police officer was killed as the result of an ex- change of gunfire between soldiers and police. Prime Minister Motsoahae Thomas Thabane fled to South Africa and accused his deputy Mothetjoa Metsing Photo Credit: Linda Henry, RPCV of being behind the army's actions. Foreign Ministers of the Southern African Development Community (SADC) States met with the leaders of the three political parties that made up Lesotho’s Coalition govern- ment in an attempt to resolve the conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critique of Proceduralism in the Adjudication of Electoral Disputes in Lesotho
    VOLUME 17 NO 2 DOI: 10.20940/JAE/2018/v17i2aDOI: 10.20940/JAE/2018/v17i2a1 1 1 A CRITIQUE OF PROCEDURALISM IN THE ADJUDICATION OF ELECTORAL DISPUTES IN LESOTHO Hoolo ‘Nyane Hoolo ‘Nyane is Associate Professor and Head of Public and Environmental Law, School of Law, University of Limpopo ABSTRACT One of the characteristic features of electoral democracy in Lesotho is dis- puted elections. Since 1993, when the country returned to constitutional democracy after a long haul of dictatorship and monarcho-military rule, every election has been subjected to one form of discontent or another. The aggrieved parties use various ways to vent their dissatisfactions, and more often than not, disputes end up in the courts of law. The courts are then called on to determine the validity or otherwise of the election results de- clared by the election management body. All seven elections since 1993 have been challenged in the courts of law. Despite this determination by political players in Lesotho to resolve electoral disputes through the courts of law, amongst other means, there is no court in Lesotho that has over- turned an election result or ordered the reallocation of seats since 1993. The petitions are almost invariably dismissed on procedural grounds or on the basis of misapplication of the substantial effect doctrine. This approach to the adjudication of disputes in Lesotho has not only jeopardised substan- tive electoral justice in the country but has also arguably perpetuated the electoral violence that has been one of the characteristic features of electoral politics in Lesotho. The purpose of this article, therefore, is to critique this approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Alliances, Coalitions and the Political System in Lesotho 2007-2012
    VOLUME 13 NO 1 93 ALLIANCES, COALITIONS AND THE POLITICAL SYSTEM IN LESOTHO 2007-2012 Motlamelle Anthony Kapa and Victor Shale Dr Motlamelle Anthony Kapa is lecturer and head of the Department of Political and Administrative Studies at the National University of Lesotho e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Dr Victor Shale is EISA’s Zimbabwe Resident Director e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper assesses political party alliances and coalitions in Lesotho, focusing on their causes and their consequences for party systems, democratic consolidation, national cohesion and state governability. We agree with Kapa (2008) that formation of the pre-2007 alliances can be explained in terms of office-seeking theory in that the political elite used alliances to access and retain power. These alliances altered the country’s party system, leading to conflict between parties inside and outside Parliament, as well as effectively changing the mixed member proportional (MMP) electoral system into a parallel one, thereby violating the spirit of the system. However, the phenomenon did not change state governability; it effectively perpetuated the one-party dominance of the Lesotho Congress for Democracy (LCD) and threatened national cohesion. The post-2012 coalition, on the other hand, was a product of a hung parliament produced by the elections. The impact of the coalition on the party system, state governability and democratic consolidation is yet to be determined as the coalition phenomenon is still new. However, state governability has been marked by a generally very slow pace of policy implementation and the party system has been both polarised and reconfigured while national cohesion has been strengthened.
    [Show full text]
  • Doctoral Dissertation
    Doctoral Dissertation A Critical Assessment of Conflict Transformation Capacity in the Southern African Development Community (SADC): Deepening the Search for a Self-Sustainable and Effective Regional Infrastructure for Peace (RI4P) MALEBANG GABRIEL GOSIAME G. Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation Hiroshima University September 2014 A Critical Assessment of Conflict Transformation Capacity in the Southern African Development Community (SADC): Deepening the Search for a Self-Sustainable and Effective Regional Infrastructure for Peace (RI4P) D115734 MALEBANG GABRIEL GOSIAME G. A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation of Hiroshima University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2014 DECLARATION I hereby declare that this doctoral thesis is in its original form. The ideas expressed and the research findings recorded in this doctoral thesis are my own unaided work written by me MALEBANG GABRIEL GOSIAME G. The information contained herein is adequately referenced. It was gathered from primary and secondary sources which include elite interviews, personal interviews, archival and scholarly materials, technical reports by both local and international agencies and governments. The research was conducted in compliance with the ethical standards and guidelines of the Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation (IDEC) of Hiroshima University, Japan. The consent of all respondents was obtained using the consent form as shown in Appendix 3 for the field research component of the study and for use of the respondent’s direct words as quoted therein. iii DEDICATIONS This dissertation is dedicated to the loving memory of my mother Roseline Keitumetse Malebang (1948 – 1999) and to all the people of Southern Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesotho Country Report BTI 2018
    BTI 2018 Country Report Lesotho This report is part of the Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index (BTI) 2018. It covers the period from February 1, 2015 to January 31, 2017. The BTI assesses the transformation toward democracy and a market economy as well as the quality of political management in 129 countries. More on the BTI at http://www.bti-project.org. Please cite as follows: Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2018 Country Report — Lesotho. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2018. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Contact Bertelsmann Stiftung Carl-Bertelsmann-Strasse 256 33111 Gütersloh Germany Sabine Donner Phone +49 5241 81 81501 [email protected] Hauke Hartmann Phone +49 5241 81 81389 [email protected] Robert Schwarz Phone +49 5241 81 81402 [email protected] Sabine Steinkamp Phone +49 5241 81 81507 [email protected] BTI 2018 | Lesotho 3 Key Indicators Population M 2.2 HDI 0.497 GDP p.c., PPP $ 3029 Pop. growth1 % p.a. 1.3 HDI rank of 188 160 Gini Index 54.2 Life expectancy years 53.6 UN Education Index 0.528 Poverty3 % 78.0 Urban population % 27.8 Gender inequality2 0.549 Aid per capita $ 38.2 Sources (as of October 2017): The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2017 | UNDP, Human Development Report 2016. Footnotes: (1) Average annual growth rate. (2) Gender Inequality Index (GII). (3) Percentage of population living on less than $3.20 a day at 2011 international prices. Executive Summary Lesotho has been shaken by a series of destabilizing events during the period under review (2015- 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Southern African Charter on Land, Labour and Food Security
    The African e-Journals Project has digitized full text of articles of eleven social science and humanities journals. This item is from the digital archive maintained by Michigan State University Library. Find more at: http://digital.lib.msu.edu/projects/africanjournals/ Available through a partnership with Scroll down to read the article. Afr. j. polit. sci. (1997), Vol. 2 No. 1, 140-151 The 1993 Elections in Lesotho and The Nature of the BCP Victory Khabele Matlosa* Introduction Almost without exception, African states are undergoing a profound policy shift informed by the twin processes of economic adjustment and political liberalisation (Gibbon et. al, 1992; Chole and Ibrahim, 1995; Mkandawire and Olukoshi, 1995; Baylies, 1995; Clapham, 1995). Although both are driven by the two powerful international financial institutions — the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank — and various Western bilateral donors, the latter is also the result of endogenous factors within these states, especially after the collapse of the bi-polar world order in 1990 (Mkandawire, 1995 : 82). Nonetheless, economic adjustment has been regarded by the donor community in general as a necessary condition for the transition from authoritarian rule to multi-party democracy. This explains in part the tendency by donors to recommend that these two processes be imple- mented in tandem; and political liberalisation is now perceived by donors as a critical conditionality for continued development assistance to African states. (Ninsin 1993 : 5). Lesotho, a small, landlocked and impoverished state in Southern Africa is not an exception to this post-Cold War rule of thumb that governs current relations between donor and recipient countries.
    [Show full text]