DOCSLIB.ORG

Rechtsanwälte Günther Partnerschaft

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rechtsanwälte Günther Partnerschaft Rechtsanwälte Günther Partnerschaft Rechtsanwälte Günther • Postfach 130473 • 20104 Hamburg * Michael Günther * 1 Bundesverfassungsgericht Hans-Gerd Heidel Dr. Ulrich Wollenteit * 2 Schlossbezirk 3 Martin Hack LL.M. (Stockholm) * 2 76131 Karlsruhe Clara Goldmann LL.M. (Sydney) * Dr. Michéle John * Dr. Dirk Legler LL.M. (Cape Town) * by messenger Dr. Roda Verheyen LL.M. (London) * Dr. Davina Bruhn Jenny Kortländer LL.M. (Brisbane) 1 Fachanwalt für Familienrecht 2 Fachanwalt für Verwaltungsrecht * Partner der Partnerschaft AG Hamburg PR 582 Mittelweg 150 20148 Hamburg Unofficial translation Tel.: 040-278494-0 Fax: 040-278494-99 www.rae-guenther.de Constitutional complaint 06.02.2020 00362/19/R /H By the teenagers and young adults Mitarbeiterin: Jule Drzewiecki Durchwahl: 040-278494-11 Email: [email protected] 1) Luisa Neubauer 2) Sophie Backsen 3) Paul Backsen 4) Hannes Backsen 5) Jakob Backsen 6) Lucas Lütke Schwienhorst 7) Franziska Blohm 8) Johannes Blohm 9) Lueke Recktenwald Representative: Attorneys Günther, Mittelweg 150, 20148 Hamburg – attorney Dr. Roda Verheyen and attorney Dr. Ulrich Wollenteit - complainant - Regarding: Federal Climate Protection Act (TN: in German “Bundeskli- maschutzgesetz”) (BGBl. I (2019) p. 2513 ff) Legislative omission Buslinie 109, Haltestelle Böttgerstraße Fern- und S-Bahnhof Dammtor Parkhaus Brodersweg Hamburger Sparkasse Commerzbank AG GLS Bank IBAN DE84 2005 0550 1022 2503 83 IBAN DE22 2008 0000 0400 0262 00 IBAN DE61 4306 0967 2033 2109 00 BIC HASPDEHHXXX BIC DRESDEFF200 BIC GENODEM1GLS Rechtsanwälte Günther Partnerschaft - 2 - In the name of and on behalf of the complainants we lodge a constitutional com- plaint. A certified copy of the powers of attorney is enclosed. Violations of the basic right of human dignity, life and physical integrity (Article 1, Article 2.2 sentence 1 of the Basic Law (TN: in German “Grundgesetz”), each in conjunction with Article 20a of the Basic Law), of freedom of occupation and of the guarantee of property (Article 12.1 and Article 14.1 sentence 1 of the Basic Law), as well as the violation of these basic rights in conjunction with Article 20.3 of the Basic Law with regard to Articles 2 and 8 of the ECHR are submitted. The complainants request to 1. declare that, by implementing a 55 % reduction quota in respect of green- house gases for the target year 2030 pursuant to Paragraph 3(1) of the KSG and by setting annual reduction targets for the energy, industry, transport, buildings, agriculture and waste management and other sectors in Paragraph 4(1) in conjunction with Annexes 1 and 2 of the Federal Climate Protection Act (“Bundesklimaschutzgesetz” hereafter known as “KSG”), the legislature has violated the basic rights of the complainants under Article 1 in conjunction with Article 20a of the Basic Law, Article 2(2), Article 12 and Article 14 2. declare that the Federal legislature is obliged to ensure, within a period of time to be set by the Federal Constitutional Court, by means of a new statutory regulation of the reduction quotas for greenhouse gases, that greenhouse gas emissions in the Federal Republic of Germany are kept as low as possible on the basis of more comprehensible forecasts and taking into account the principle of proportionality. 3. declare that the Federal legislator is obliged to create regulations within the period determined in accordance with No. 2 which prohibit the Fed- eral Republic of Germany from transferring emissions allocations on the basis of section 4 para. 3 of the KSG in conjunction with section 4 para. 3 of the KSG. Art. 5 of Regulation (EU) 2018/842 of 30 May 2018 to European neighbouring states as long as the EU climate protection legis- lation does not provide a level of protection adequate to the basic rights. Rechtsanwälte Günther Partnerschaft - 3 - 4. order the Federal Republic of Germany to reimburse the complainants' necessary expenses. The court is politely informed that the Federal Republic of Germany is, for fac- tually similar reasons to those currently being heard in this complaint, the re- spondent in proceedings involving several children and young people on the ba- sis of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child ratified in 1992 (on the basis of Article 5 of the Third Additional Protocol). Reference is made to the constitutional complaints already before this Court in this or similar matter: - Göppel et al., Az. 1 BvR 2656/18 - Yi Yi Prue et al., Az. 1 BvR 78/20 - Steinmetz et al., Az. 1 BvR 96/20 and - should they be accepted for decision - suggested that they be combined with this complaint pursuant to § 66 of the BVerfGG. The annexes are preceded by an annex list with numbers. The complaint follows the following structure: Rechtsanwälte Günther Partnerschaft - 4 - CONTENT I. Summary of the submissions .................................................................. 7 II. Factual and legal starting point .................................................................... 13 1. Climate change ..................................................................................... 13 a) Scientific basis and German emissions ............................................. 14 b) Climate Change in International Law: The Paris Agreement ........... 22 c) The (inevitable) effects of climate change ........................................ 24 aa) In general ........................................................................................ 24 bb) The generation problem of further rising temperatures .................. 31 (1) Heat waves .................................................................................. 32 (2) Allergies ...................................................................................... 34 (3) Asthma ........................................................................................ 36 (4) Novel diseases ......................................................................... 37 (5) Increased risk of skin cancer ................................................... 38 (6) Global political instability ....................................................... 38 (7) Sea-level rise ........................................................................... 39 (8) Costs ........................................................................................ 39 (9) Tipping Points ......................................................................... 40 2. The CO2 budget ......................................................................................... 42 a) Basics of the C02 budget .................................................................. 42 b) Concrete calculations and breakdown .............................................. 44 c) Negative Emissions or Climate Engineering .................................... 48 III. Federal Climate Protection Act and National Climate Protection Programme ........................................................................................................ 49 1. Statutory climate protection targets – KSG – subject of the complaint 51 2. Missed climate protection target 2020 .................................................. 53 3. Climate Protection Plan 2050 ............................................................... 55 4. Climate Protection Programme 2030 .................................................... 56 5. Feasibility of additional measures ........................................................ 58 a) RESCUE study ..................................................................................... 58 b) Measures from the dialogue on the Climate Protection Plan 2050 ...... 59 Rechtsanwälte Günther Partnerschaft - 5 - c) Further measures ................................................................................... 60 d) Current Coal Exit Act ....................................................................... 61 IV. EU law and EU budget ............................................................................... 63 1. The Federal Climate Protection Act (only) implements EU law .......... 63 2. The EU climate protection regime ........................................................ 63 3. The EU budget and the obligation to act .............................................. 67 V. The complainants ......................................................................................... 70 VI. The decisions in the Urgenda case in the Netherlands ......................... 74 VII. Legal Arguments ................................................................................... 81 1. Admissibility of the constitutional complaint ....................................... 82 a) Capability to complain ...................................................................... 82 b) Subject of complaint ......................................................................... 82 aa) Application under 1. ........................................................................ 82 bb) Application under 2. ....................................................................... 84 cc) Application under 3. ........................................................................ 85 c) Standing to file a constitutional complaint ....................................... 85 aa) Violation of basic rights .................................................................. 86 aaa) Basic rights as duties to protect ................................................. 86 bbb) Art. 1 Basic Law: Human Dignity ............................................ 88 ccc) Article 2(2) of the Basic Law: Right to life and physical
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Guide to Investing in Germany Introduction | 3
    BERLIN COLOGNE DUSSELDORF FRANKFURT HAMBURG MUNICH A guide to investing STUTTGART in Germany ísafördur Saudharkrokur Akureyri Borgarnes Keflavik Reykjavik Selfoss ICELAND Egilsstadir A guide to investing in Germany Introduction | 3 BERLIN FINLAND ME TI HT NORWAY IG HELSINKI FL COLOGNE R 2H SWEDEN TALLINN OSLO INTRODUCTION ESTONIA STOCKHOLM IME T T GH LI DUSSELDORF F IN 0M 3 RIGA INVESTING IN GERMANY R 1H LATVIA E FRANKFURT EDINBURGH IM T T LITHUANIA GH DENMARK LI F R COPENHAGEN VILNIUS BELFAST 1H MINSK IRELAND HAMBURG DUBLIN BELARUS IME HT T LIG F IN HAMBURG M 0 UNITED KINGDOM 3 WARSAW Germany is one of the largest Investment Markets in Europe, with an average commercial AMSTERDAM BERLIN KIEV MUNICH NETHERLANDS POLAND transaction volume of more than €25 bn (2007-2012). It is a safe haven for global capital and LONDON BRUSSELS DÜSSELDORF COLOGNE UKRAINE offers investors a stable financial, political and legal environment that is highly attractive to both BELGIUM PRAGUE STUTTGART FRANKFURT CZECH REPUBLIC domestic and international groups. LUXEMBOURG PARIS SLOVAKIA STUTTGART BRATISLAVA VIENNA MUNICH BUDAPEST This brochure provides an introduction to investing in German real estate. Jones Lang LaSalle FRANCE AUSTRIA HUNGARY BERN ROMANIA has 40 years experience in Germany and today has ten offices covering all of the major German SWITZERLAND SLOVENIA markets. Our full-service real estate offering is unrivalled in Germany and we look forward to LJUBLJANA CROATIA BUCHAREST ZAGREB BELGRADE sharing our in-depth market knowledge with you. BOSNIA & HERZEGOVINA SERBIA SARAJEVO BULGARIA ITALY SOFIA PRESTINA KOSOVO Timo Tschammler MSc FRICS SKOPJE HAMBURG MACEDONIA International Director ROME TIRANA MADRID ALBANIA Management Board Germany PORTUGAL Lisboa (Lisbon) SPAIN GREECE Office and Industrial, Jones Lang LaSalle Setúbal ATHENS BERLIN Germany enjoys a thriving, robust and mature real estate market which is one of the DÜSSELDORF cornerstones of the German economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Kirchliche Zeitgeschichte, Teil 5
    Hamburgische Kirchengeschichte in Aufsätzen Teil 5 Kirchliche Zeitgeschichte (20. Jahrhundert) Hamburg University Press Arbeiten zur Kirchengeschichte Hamburgs, Band 26 Kirchliche Zeitgeschichte (20. Jahrhundert) Hamburgische Kirchengeschichte in Aufsätzen, Teil 5 Arbeiten zur Kirchengeschichte Hamburgs Herausgegeben von Rainer Hering · Maria Jepsen · Inge Mager · Johann Anselm Steiger · Joachim Stüben Band 26 Kirchliche Zeitgeschichte (20. Jahrhundert) Hamburgische Kirchengeschichte in Aufsätzen, Teil 5 Herausgegeben von Rainer Hering und Inge Mager Hamburg University Press Verlag der Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Hamburg Carl von Ossietzky Impressum Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek: Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar. Die Online-Version dieser Publikation ist auf den Verlagswebseiten frei verfügbar (open access). Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek hat die Netzpublikation archiviert. Diese ist dauerhaft auf dem Archivserver der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek verfügbar. Open access über die folgenden Webseiten: Hamburg University Press – http://hup.sub.uni-hamburg.de Archivserver der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek – http://deposit.d-nb.de Abbildung auf Schutzumschlag und Buchdecke: Ruine der Hauptkirche St. Nikolai nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg (Staatsarchiv Hamburg) ISBN 978-3-937816-46-3 ISSN 0518-2107 © 2008 Hamburg University Press, Verlag der Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek
    [Show full text]
  • The Hamburg Rathaus Seat of the Hamburg State Parliament and the Hamburg State Administration
    Hun bixêr hatin Mirë se erdhët Te aven Baxtale Welcome Bienvenue Willkommen THE HAMBURG RATHAUS SEAT OF THE HAMBURG STATE PARLIAMENT AND THE HAMBURG STATE ADMINISTRATION Kalender Englisch Umschlag U1-U4.indd 1 06.06.17 20:56 The Hamburg Rathaus Kalender Englisch Umschlag U1-U4.indd 2 06.06.17 20:57 The Hamburg Rathaus Seat of the state parliament and state administration Welcome to Hamburg! We hope that you will Hygieia and the dragon symbolize the conque- state parliament and the Hamburg state ad- settle in well and that Hamburg will become ring of the Hamburg cholera epidemic of 1892. minstration. your second home. With this brochure, we’d In Hamburg, the state parliament is called the like to introduce you to the Hamburg Rathaus, Bürgerschaft and the state administration is the city hall. It is the seat of Hamburg’s state called the Senat. parliament and administration. Perhaps it It is at the Rathaus where issues important is comparable to similar buildings in your to you are debated and resolutions made – countries, in which the state administration housing and health issues, education issues, or state parliament have their seats. and economic issues, for example. The Rathaus is in the middle of the city, and Please take the time to accompany us through was built more than 100 years ago, between the Hamburg Rathaus on the following pages, 1884 and 1897. With its richly decorated and learn about the work and the responsibili- commons.wikimedia.org/Brüning (gr.); Rademacher Jens Photos: façade, its width of 111 meters, its 112-meter ties of the Senat and the Bürgerschaft.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief Concerning the Scope and Meaning of Certain Provisions in the Constitutions of the German Länder*
    Brief concerning the scope and meaning of certain provisions in the constitutions of the German Länder* Prof. Dr. Matthias Niedobitek, Chemnitz University of Technology [May, 13,2013] Structure I. Preface II. Basic features of the German federal State III. The Länder as states 1. Elements of Länder statehood 2. Originality of Länder statehood 3. Attributes of Länder statehood IV. Constitutions of the Länder 1. Constitutional autonomy 2. Constitution-making 3. Constitutional amendment V. The democratic principle in the Land constitutions 1. The Länder as "democratic states" 2. The peoples of the Länder 3. Sovereignty of the people 4. Democratic representation 5. Summary VI. Right to self-determination VII. Conclusions * Translations of academic literature and of court decisions into English were carried out by the author. Translations of provisions of Land constitutions were also carried out by the author or taken from the official Websites of the lö/jäfer. 2 I. Preface • Scope of assignment I have been retained by the Quebec Government to submit my opinion reiating to certain questions of German Constitutional Law that were submitted to me. I understand that my opinion is being sought in connection with pending litigation before the Quebec Superior Court reiating to the Act adopted by the Quebec National Assembly entitled: An Act Respecting the Exercise of the Fundamental Rights and Prerogatives of the Quebec People and the Quebec State"" (S.Q., 2000, c. 46). The following questions were submitted to me: 1) In the German federation, what
    [Show full text]
  • Hamburg Hamburg Presents
    International Police Association InternationalP oliceA ssociation RegionRegionIPA Hamburg Hamburg presents: HamburgHamburg -- a a short short break break Tabel of contents 1. General Information ................................................................1 2. Hamburg history in brief..........................................................2 3. The rivers of Hamburg ............................................................8 4. Attractions ...............................................................................9 4.1 The port.................................................................................9 4.2 The Airport (Hamburg Airport .............................................10 4.3 Finkenwerder / Airbus Airport..............................................10 4.4 The Town Hall .....................................................................10 4.5 The stock exchange............................................................10 4.6 The TV Tower / Heinrich Hertz Tower..................................11 4.7 The St. Pauli Landungsbrücken with the (old) Elbtunnel.....11 4.8 The Congress Center Hamburg (CCH)...............................11 4.9 HafenCity and Speicherstadt ..............................................12 4.10 The Elbphilharmonie .........................................................12 4.11 The miniature wonderland.................................................12 4.12 The planetarium ................................................................13 5. The main churches of Hamburg............................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Msc. Thesis Environmental Policy Group
    Unknown Territory – Uncertainty in a transformative process of political practice The Remunicipalisation of the Energy Distribution Grids in Hamburg, Germany M.Sc. Thesis Environmental Policy Group, Wageningen University Martin Bosak M.Sc. Climate Studies Student number: 891124-105-040 Contact: [email protected] Course code: ENP-80436 Thesis supervisor: Ingrid Boas Second Reader: Kris van Koppen Submission: 12.06.2017 Wageningen University i MSc. Thesis Environmental Policy Group Abstract Uncertainty is an omnipresent phenomenon that challenges political decision-making in face of complex problems. With regard to the looming threat of climate change, uncertainty seems to paralyse political action, since decision-makers appear to be overwhelmed by the complexity of the problem and find themselves trapped in an ingenuity gap. In order to overcome this ingenuity gap and the general cognitive dissonance in face of climate change, this work emphasises the need to understand the role functioning of uncertainty within transformative political processes. By examining the transformative process of the remunicipalisation of energy distribution grids in Hamburg, Germany, this thesis goes beyond the conceptual level and seeks to determine the role and functioning of uncertainty in a real world process of political practice. In order to reveal the presumed causal inference of uncertainty, explaining-outcome process-tracing is applied as a methodological framework in combination with an interpretative approach to analyse the empirical data of 13 qualitative interviews. In the empirical analysis it was possible to establish uncertainty as the causal mechanism in the remunicipalisation process in Hamburg, determining a minimally sufficient explanation for how uncertainty affected the outcome of this process.
    [Show full text]
  • Hsh Finanzfonds Aör and (Ii) the Simplified Prospectus of Hsh Portfoliomanagement Aör (Together, the "Simplified Prospectus" Or the "Prospectus")
    This document comprises two simplified prospectuses (prospectus simplifié) in accordance with Part III, Chapter 2 of the Luxembourg Law on Prospectuses for Securities dated 10 July 2005, (Loi relative aux prospectus pour valeurs mobilières), as amended (the "Luxembourg Prospectus Law"): (i) the simplified prospectus of hsh finanzfonds AöR and (ii) the simplified prospectus of hsh portfoliomanagement AöR (together, the "Simplified Prospectus" or the "Prospectus"). 18 August 2017 HSH Finanzfonds AöR Hamburg, Federal Republic of Germany (established in the Federal Republic of Germany as a public law institution) hsh portfoliomanagement AöR Kiel, Federal Republic of Germany (established in the Federal Republic of Germany as a public law institution) Euro 2,000,000,000 Debt Issuance Programme of HSH Finanzfonds AöR and Euro 2,000,000,000 Debt Issuance Programme of hsh portfoliomanagement AöR (each a "Programme" and together, the "Programmes") and each issue of notes under the Programme is severally, unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed by the State of Hamburg and the State of Schleswig-Holstein FREIE UND HANSESTADT HAMBURG LAND SCHLESWIG-HOLSTEIN Application has been made to the Bourse de Luxembourg (the "Luxembourg Stock Exchange") in its capacity as competent authority (the "Competent Authority") under the Luxembourg Prospectus Law to provide a certificate of approval attesting that this Simplified Prospectus has been drawn up in accordance with Part III, Chapter 2 of the Luxembourg Prospectus Law for purposes of admission of the notes
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF 'Direct Democracy in the German Länder: History
    C2D ± Centre for Research on Direct Democracy ZDA - Zentrum für Demokratie Aarau University of Zurich C2D Working Paper Series Direct Democracy in the German Länder: History, Institutions, and (Mal)Functions Andreas ROHNER Rohner, Andreas Direct Democracy in the German Länder: History, Institutions, and (Mal)Functions C2D Working Paper Series 38/2011 C2D – Centre for Research on Direct Democracy Rohner, Andreas Direct Democracy in the German Länder: History, Institutions, and (Mal)Functions C2D Working Paper Series 38/2011 C2D – Centre for Research on Direct Democracy ISSN 1662-8152 http://www.c2d.ch ANDREAS ROHNER Andreas Rohner is studying political science and public law at the University of Zurich (UZH). Currently he is working as an undergraduate research assistant at the Centre for Democracy Studies (Zentrum für Demokratie) in Aarau, Switzerland. Abstract This paper examines the direct democratic institutions within the German political system. In a first step, direct democratic elements are analyzed in a historical context covering a period from the Weimar Republic to and beyond German Reunification. In a second step, the direct democratic instruments provided in the Basic Law and the various state constitutions are analyzed in their respective legal context whereby the focus lies on the Länder level. Finally, the main points of criticism of the current state of direct democracy in Germany – and their remedies – are to be outlined. The historical analysis shows that the “Weimar experience” – contrary to commonly held beliefs – cannot provide the reason for not implementing direct democratic elements in the Basic Law after World War II. The compar- ative legal examination of the Länder constitutions identifies three institu- tional types of direct democracy – a two-tier-model, a three-tier-model and a hybrid model – which are presented in detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Corruption: Limiting Criminal Immunity of Legislative, Executive and Judicial Officials in Europe
    ARTICLES Tilman Hoppe Public Corruption: Limiting Criminal Immunity of Legislative, Executive and Judicial Officials in Europe ABSTRACT The constitutions of European states often contain too many categories of officials covered by too broadly defined immunities. At the same time, there is consensus among international organizations that immunities have to be limited to allow effective prosecution of corruption offences. This article examines how public law in European states could limit criminal immunities for officials. 1. INTRODUCTION Surveys show a strong belief that public officials' immunity from prosecution is supporting corruption.1 Prominent cases, such as that of former Ukrainian Prime Minister Lazarenko, who, from 1996-1997, embezzled more than US$ 100 million,2 and numerous less prominent cases all over Europe, involving parliamentarians,3 judges,4 and heads of state,5 support this public perception. 1 See e.g. Transparency International's Bribe Payers Survey 1999, p. 4 (63% of respondents to a survey by Gallup International see 'public official's immunity' as one of the 'main factors that have contributed to an increase in corruption', ranking it the 2nd most important factor), <www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/bpi> accessed 1 March 2011. 2 Todd S. Foglesong, Peter H. Solomon, 'Crime, Criminal Justice, and Criminology in Post-Soviet Ukraine' (National Institute of Justice, July 2001) <www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/186166.pdf> accessed 1 March 2011. 3 See e.g. payments by the 'Flick'-Holding to several Members of the German Bundestag in the years 1969 to 1989, Landgericht Bonn, 27 F 7/83, 16 February 1987, ending with an acquittal of one Member of Parliament from the charges of bribery despite 'grave points of suspicion'.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamburg - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Page 1 of 28
    Hamburg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Page 1 of 28 Hamburg Coordinates: 53°33′55″N 10°00′05″E From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Hamburg (pron.: /ˈhæmbɜrɡ/; German pronunciation: [ˈhambʊɐ̯ k], local pronunciation Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg [ˈhambʊɪç]; Low German/Low Saxon: Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg Hamborg [ˈhaˑmbɔːx]), officially Free and — State of Germany — Hanseatic City of Hamburg, is the second largest city in Germany, the thirteenth largest German state, and the sixth largest city in the European Union.[2] The city is home to over 1.8 million people, while the Hamburg Metropolitan Region (including parts of the neighbouring Federal States of Lower Saxony and Schleswig-Holstein) has more than 5 million inhabitants. Situated on the river Elbe, the port of Hamburg is the second largest port in Europe (after the Port of Rotterdam) and tenth largest worldwide. Hamburg's official name, Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg (German: Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg),[3] reflects Hamburg's history as a member of the medieval Hanseatic 1st row: View of the Binnenalster; 2nd row: Große Freiheit, League, as a free imperial city of the Holy Speicherstadt, River Elbe; 3rd row: Alsterfleet; 4th row: Port of Roman Empire, and that Hamburg is a city- Hamburg, Dockland office building state and one of the sixteen States of Germany. Before the 1871 Unification of Germany, Hamburg was a fully sovereign state of its own. Prior to the constitutional changes in 1919, the stringent civic republic was ruled by a class of hereditary grand burghers or Flag Hanseaten. Coat of arms Hamburg is a major transport hub in Northern Germany and is one of the most affluent cities in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stormtrooper Family
    THE STORMTROOPER FAMILY : HOW SEXUALITY , S PIRITUALITY , AND COMMUNITY SHAPED THE HAMBURG SA A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History By Andrew Wackerfuss, M.A. Washington, DC December 15, 2008 Copyright 2008 by Andrew Wackerfuss All Rights Reserved ii THE STORMTROOPER FAMILY : HOW SEXUALITY , SPIRITUALITY , AND COMMUNITY SHAPED THE HAMBURG SA Andrew Wackerfuss, M.A. Thesis Advisor: Roger Chickering, Ph.D. ABSTRACT The dissertation explains the attraction of the stormtroopers ( Sturmabteilung ; SA), the Nazis’ paramilitary band of “political soldiers” in the city of Hamburg. It argues that social networks and personal relationships – including family ties, religious affiliations, and sexual bonds among stormtroopers – represented the primary means of recruiting and integrating new members into the Nazi movement. The SA emphasized the social, emotional, and political benefits that young men could accrue by joining the group, which established an array of social welfare systems during the dismal days of the depression. In return for food and housing, male camaraderie, a sense of ersatz family, and the promise of social and economic integration into the local community, young stormtroopers became the Party’s foot soldiers. SA pubs and barracks were simultaneously places of refuge and sites of violence, where the stormtroopers were taught to strive for a sacrificial death that Party propagandists could use to argue for Nazi heroism, Communist criminality, and republican inability to maintain order in the German state. Hamburg’s stormtroopers claimed to defend their communities and families.
    [Show full text]
  • Subconstitutionalism in a Multilayered System. a Comparative Analysis of Constitutional Politics in the German Länder by Astrid Lorenz - Werner Reutter ∗
    ISSN: 2036-5438 Subconstitutionalism in a Multilayered System. A Comparative Analysis of Constitutional Politics in the German Länder by Astrid Lorenz - Werner Reutter ∗ Perspectives on Federalism, Vol. 4, issue 2, 2012 Except where otherwise noted content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons 2.5 Italy License E -148 Abstract Even though there have been some revaluations of the Länder in the last two decades German debates on federalism hardly take subnational constitutional politics into account. For example, textbooks on federalism deal with amendments of the German constitution, i.e. the Basic Law, but they mostly fail to address constitutional adjustments at the subnational level or causal interrelations between the two constitutional levels. In this paper we will, of course, not be able, to fill that rather huge gap. Taking G. Alan Tarr’s highly intriguing paper on “Subnational Constitutional Space” as a blueprint, we analyze German “subconstitutionalism” in three steps. First, we will describe and compare Land constitutions in order to highlight differences between them and similarities among them (1.). Second, we will present some explanations for these differences and similarities (2.), and finally we analyze some issues concerning changes of Land constitutions (3.). Key-words Germany, subnational constitutionalism, Länder , Basic Law Except where otherwise noted content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons 2.5 Italy License E -149 “Subconstitionalism” understood as the arrangement between the constitution of a “superstate” and the constitutions of subordinate states (Ginsburg/Posner 2010) necessarily presupposes a multilayered system. In such a system sovereign rights are allocated among at least two levels.
    [Show full text]