The Many Misters Trudeau
The Many Misters Trudeau Donald Wright OMMENTING ON THE DIFFERENCE between first- politics of the early 1940s. It presents a young man who, rate men and second-rate men, Frank Underhill however briefly, dreamed of an independent, French- noted that the first-rate man “is always trying to speaking, Catholic nation. Finally, it presents a young reveal himself to the public” while the second-rate man man who, when he went to Harvard in 1944, recognized C“is always trying to hide himself from the public.” Mr. the narrowness, limitations, and failings of his education. Trudeau, he said, was a first-rate man. His American The re-education of Trudeau, the Nemnis promise, will counterpart, Richard Nixon, was a second-rate man. But be the subject of their second volume. both men, he predicted, would fail. Trudeau would fail The Nemnis are unable to contain their shock and, to reveal his real self while Nixon would fail to hide his one suspects, their personal disappointment that real self. Underhill proved eerily prescient. Nixon was Trudeau was not someone who rowed against the cur- exposed for what he was—a thug and a criminal—while rent, that he was not someone “who enjoyed irritating Trudeau continues to command our attention and even the other students and their teachers by his conspicuous our fascination. Who was Mr. Trudeau? anti-nationalism.” Insecure in their discovery and not cer- For Max and Monique Nemni, he was a callow tain how to handle the evidence, they overcompensate young man and a crypto corporatist. He was also their in their harsh criticism of Trudeau’s education by the friend.
[Show full text]