DOCSLIB.ORG

On the Road the Journal of the Alliance of British Drivers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
On the Road the Journal of the Alliance of British Drivers On The Road The journal of the Alliance of British Drivers Issue 117 Winter 2015/16 Banning pavement parking isn’t always the answer he ABD has been campaigning against the Pavement Parking Bill - a Private TMember’s Bill which reached its second reading in the House of Commons earlier this month. It is designed to give local authorities the right to ban all pavement parking by default on urban roads where the speed limit is 40mph or less. ABD’s Ian Taylor discussed it face-to-face with John Edwards of Living Streets, formerly The Pedestrian Association, which has been lobbying in favour of the new rules. Ian said: “Having been shown some pictures of ‘sensible’ Riga is an example of a sensible approach to pavement parking pavement parking, John said he didn’t mind that, and simply wanted to make it easier for local authorities to tackle that which blocked pavements rather than a total Patron flying flag for ABD ban.” UKIP’s Transport spokesman Jill However, having examined the Bill in detail, the ABD can Seymour says she is honoured to have only find mention of a default blanket ban, and is therefore been made a patron of the Alliance of opposing it, in its current form, for the following reasons: British Drivers. l Councils, especially those with a zealous desire to She was invited to take up the ‘get people out of their cars’, will likely apply blanket position after speaking at our annual bans, wiping out whole residential neighbourhoods of on- general meeting, held at the Heritage street parking where there is no alternative (apart from Motor Museum in Gaydon (full report on obstructing the highway). pages 2 and 3). l A proliferation of yellow lines would make life The West Midlands-based MEP said: extremely difficult for car-owning residents. “This organisation, and a few other l Anyone who continued to park partially on a individuals, are working hard to protect pavement, whether obstructing or not, would likely become the motorist from the overbearing the target of widespread enforcement action - making a legislation, not least from the European Union. Welcome - Jill Seymour with ABD mint for local authorities in the process from penalties. directors Ian Taylor & Brian Macdowall Ian Taylor, who has worked with Sean Corker on the “As I sit on the transport committee campaign, said: “I emphasise that the ABD does not in Brussels, I’m afraid I only see an “I am honoured to have been invited condone irresponsible parking that obstructs pavements; escalating war on the motorist, with to become a patron of the ABD, and am any more than that which blocks road carriageways. This is hardly anyone defending their interests. delighted to accept. We must campaign already covered in law. It is the duty of organisations such against the overbearing European Union “However, there are places where sensible pavement as the Alliance of British Drivers to - and our own Government - on their parking would and should take place without obstructing campaign on behalf of, and to protect, relentless war and persecution of the anyone – and would indeed help keep traffic flowing. The our fellow motorists. motorist.” proposals within the Bill are hugely disproportionate, unfairly punishing the majority of sensible and considerate drivers looking to balance pedestrian access with minimal Inside our winter 2015 issue: obstruction of other road users.” The ABD believes pavement parking should only be P2: Report from our Annual General Meeting banned where there is a case for preventing obstruction, P4: Time to revive 80mph motorway speed plans? and suggests a ‘one metre rule’ - a good definition of the P5: Zero tolerance – a glimpse into the future minimum pavement width to be left free. P6: Reducing signage clutter on our Ian Taylor cites the Latvian capital of Riga as an example highways of an eminently sensible and practical approach, where P7: Why bus lanes are becoming partial pavement parking is signed and mandatory. “It works cash cows in the right places,” he said. P8: Special report: Saving a ABD members are urged to write to their MPs to Canadian freeway support the suggested amendments - taking pictures of P11: Smart motorways – aims and unobstructive and sensible pavement parking, if possible, to objectives attach as evidence. P14: News in brief Find details of your local MP here: P15: Soapbox – your views on the big issues http://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/mps/ P16: Who’s who at the ABD – useful contacts Ian says: “Please help us with this campaign.” Visit www.abd.org.uk for further details. To join the ABD call now on 0161 408 7070 The ABD campaign for l Improved road user training l Real transport choices l Investment in Britain’s roads l Honesty on transport issues Three guest speakers shared their opinions at the Alliance of British Drivers ABD director, Ian Taylor, updated members on the group’s campaigning work On The Road annual general meeting, held at the Heritage Motor Centre Museum over the past year, as well as providing details on upcoming projects On The Road Controversial issues raised at ABD’s AGM mart motorways . speed cameras . number-plate Srecognition systems . black- box vehicle tracking systems . just some of the many controversial issues which were up for discussion at the ABD’s annual general meeting. It was held at the Heritage Motor Centre Museum, Gaydon, on October 31st, with guest speakers including Dan Nesbitt of Big Brother Watch, UKIP’s Transport spokesman Jill Seymour MEP, and Phil Carey from Transport Focus. Before their presentations and the debate could get under way, though, there was the formal business of approving the income and expenditure account for the year to the end of March, and re-electing directors Brian MacDowall and Peter Roberts, who were both returned unopposed. Automatic Number Plate Recognition systems are useful, but should drivers have a choice? And so, to the presentations. First up was Dan Nesbitt from Big Brother Watch, looking at “The European Union is launching a interesting pieces of research, including the wide issue of surveillance in the motoring staggering attack on our freedom and liberties, what motorists view as the priorities for sector. they want to manage everything; from the improvement in our road transport system. It’s become a particularly hot potato in style of a vehicle, health & safety, emissions, Number one is better quality of road recent times with the fitting of eCall to be road tolls, manage motorways, driving surfaces, followed by safer design and made mandatory within the EU on all new cars licences, eCall, to name but a few.” upkeep of roads, better behaved drivers, and vans from 2018, and Automatic Number She described eCall as a gross invasion of better management of roadworks, and better Plate Recognition (ANPR) systems expanding privacy that claimed to be acting in the name management of ‘unplanned delays’ such as all the time. of safety but was nothing but the beginnings of roadworks, or accidents. a data collection scheme, taking information from cars without our consent and giving it to “ANPR cameras the government and whoever they decide to “The EU’s final push share it with. are now recording “This is something we cannot and should not in their war against tolerate, it is our business and our business between 25 and 30 alone. We should at least have the option to the motorist is in the turn it off.” million plates every She agreed with ABD members who fear pursuit of their Green single day” ANPR cameras are part of the drive to agenda” introduce a new system of tolls, road charging schemes. Dan Nesbitt of Big Brother Watch Jill Seymour, UKIP’s Transport spokesman “I am totally against tolls, as they unfairly Phil Carey, Road User Policy Advisor Is this all opening the door to automated penalise motorists who can just about afford At the bottom of the priority list was ‘better speed checking and road tolling? ABD members What is happening to all this data? Is it looking like it is not long before people will be to keep their car on the road. against those who rely on their car and cannot journey planning tools’. certainly suspect so. proven to be helping to reduce crime? And forced to use them. “The EU’s final push in their war against afford to make these changes. Phil fielded many specific questions about Dan’s view on ANPR is that it is an ‘over- how secure is all this information about “We believe that there should be public the motorist is in the pursuit of their Green “The EU is treating motorists abysmally and bottlenecks and troublespots on the motorway the-top approach’ to surveillance, and that motorists, in the light of high-profile hacks discussions about how all of these cameras agenda. They want to raise our fuel prices is sacrificing our quality of life for their Green system, including the M60 around Manchester, eCall could be ‘quite useful’ – but that drivers at other businesses? The consensus was that and telematics devices are used. even higher through new taxation on us and agenda. This is an unacceptable attack on the the miles of roadworks and 50mph limits should be given a choice on whether to use it, there are many more questions than answers “Police should have to prove that they need the petrol companies. freedom of the motorist.” on the M1 north of Derby, and changes to or not. over ANPR right now. them, and that they are not using them in an “They want to make petrol and diesel cars The final guest speaker was Phil Carey, Road sliproads on the M54 in Telford.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Call for Sites 2021 Justification Statement V3
    Planning Justification Statement Representation to Hertsmere Local Plan Process Commercial Redevelopment Land and Buildings at the Mercure Hotel Watford, A41 Bypass WD25 8JH March 2021 Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. The Site 4 3. The Proposal 7 4. Exceptional Circumstances 12 5. Economic Need 16 6. Green Belt and Landscape 25 7. Transport and Accessibility 31 8. Flood Risk 34 9. Ecology and Trees 37 10. Heritage 40 11. Other Technical Matters 41 12. Case of Exceptional Circumstances 43 13. Conclusion 51 Appendix A: Site Planning History 1 1. Introduction This Planning Justification Statement is submitted by Warner Planning on behalf of Regen Properties LLP. This submission is made to the Hertsmere Borough Council 'Employment Land Call for Sites' 2021. We promote land and buildings at the Mercure Hotel Watford, A41 Bypass WD25 8JH for allocation for B8 with ancillary B1 commercial development. The hotel has been struggling for several years, which has been further compounded by the Covid-19 Pandemic, and the hotel is due to close in late 2021/early 2022. This statement, therefore, provides representations in respect of the whole site, including the hotel buildings and the land to the south-east of the building, which is part of the same plot. Through this statement, we will demonstrate that this is a credible and deliverable opportunity with no technical issues. This submission is supported by a wealth of technical reports, including: • Masterplans – UMC • Economic Benefits Assessment - Lichfields • Landscape Visual Overview – CSA Environmental • Ecology Overview- CSA Environmental • Aboricultural Assessment – DCCLA • Flood Risk and Drainage Apprisal – EAS • Transport Review – EAS • Desk Based Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment – TRC • This Statement – Warner Planning • Market Report – Knight Frank • Employment Call for Sites Submission Form There are limited alternatives to this proposal.
    [Show full text]
  • 160 Great Britain for Updates, Visit Wigan 27 28
    160 Great Britain For Updates, visit www.routex.com Wigan 27 28 Birkenhead Liverpool M62 36 Manchester Stockport M56 Mold Chester 35 Congleton Wrexham 59 M6 Shrewsbury 64 65 07 Wolverhampton Walsall West Bromwich Llandrindod Birmingham Wells Solihull M6 03 Coventry Warwick02 Carmarthen Hereford 01 51 60 Neath M5 Swansea 06 Pontypridd Bridgend Caerphilly Newport Cardiff M4 13 Barry Swindon M5 Bristol 61 14 Weston-super-Mare Kingswood 31 Bath 32 M4 05 Trowbridge 62 Newbury Taunton M5 20 Yeovil Winchester Exeter Southampton 55 Exmouth M27 Poole Lymington Bournemouth Plymouth Torbay Newport GB_Landkarte.indd 160 05.11.12 12:44 Great Britain 161 Wakefield 16 Huddersfield Hull Barnsley Doncaster Scunthorpe Grimsby Rotherham Sheffield M1 Louth 47M1 Heanor Derby Nottingham 48 24 Grantham 15 Loughborough 42 King's Leicester Lynn 39 40 Aylsham Peterborough Coventry Norwich GB 46 01 Warwick Huntingdon Thetford Lowestoft 45 M1 Northampton 02 43 44 Cambridge Milton Bedford Keynes Biggleswade Sawston 18 M40 19 Ipswich Luton Aylesbury Oxford Felixstowe Hertford 21 50 M25 M11 Chelmsford 61 30 53 52 Slough London Bracknell Southend-on-Sea Newbury Grays 54 Wokingham 29 Rochester Basingstoke 22 M3 Guildford M2 M25 Maidstone Winchester 23 M20 17 M27 Portsmouth Chichester Brighton La Manche Calais Newport A16 A26 Boulogne-sur-Mer GB_Landkarte.indd 161 05.11.12 12:44 162 Great Britain Forfar Perth Dundee 58 Stirling Alloa 34 Greenock M90 Dumbarton Kirkintilloch Dunfermline 57 Falkirk Glasgow Paisley Livingston Edinburgh Newton M8 Haddington Mearns 04 56 Dalkeith 26 Irvine Kilmarnock Ayr Hawick A74(M) 41 Dumfries 25 Morpeth Newcastle Carlisle Upon Whitley Bay 12Tyne 08 South Shields Gateshead 09 11 Durham 49 Redcar 33 Stockton-on-Tees M6 Middlesbrough 10 38 M6 A1(M) 37 Harrogate York 63 M65 Bradford Leeds Beverley M6 28 M62 Wakefield Wigan 16 27 Huddersfield Birkenhead Liverpool Manchester Barnsley M62 Scunthorpe 35 36Stockport Doncaster Rotherham Sheffield GB_Landkarte.indd 162 05.11.12 12:44 Great Britain 163 GPS Nr.
    [Show full text]
  • The M1 Motorway (Junctions 5 – 6A
    THE M1 MOTORWAY(JUNCTIONS 5–6A) TEMPORARYOVERNIGHT CLOSURES Notice is hereby given that Highways England Company Limited(a) intends to make an Order on the M1 Motorway,inthe County of Hertfordshire, under Section 14(1)(a) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 because works areproposed to be executed on the road. The effect of the Order would be to authorise the overnight closureofthe following – (a) the slip roads leading to and from both carriageways of the M1 at Junction 5(A41, A4008); (b) the slip roads leading to and from both carriageways of the M1 at Junction 6(A405); and (c) the link road leading from the southbound carriageway of the M1 at Junction 6A to both carriageways of the M25 at Junction 21. These measures would be in the interest of road safety to enable contractors to undertake cyclical maintenance work. It is expected that the work would take place for approximately 1-2nights for each closureat(a) –(c) above every two months at the following times: Monday-Thursday nights 22:00 –05:30 Friday nights 23:00 –06:00 Saturday nights 22:00 –06:00 Sunday nights 22:30 –05:30 The Order would come into force on 1August2017 and have amaximum duration of twelve months. During the closures outlined above, traffic affected would be diverted using other junctions of the M1, the A41, the A405 and the A410. The slip road closures, link road closureand diversion routes would be clearly indicated by traffic signs throughout the works periods. MTaylor, an official of Highways England Company Limited Ref: HA/M1/35/3/1894 (a)Registered in England and Wales under company no.
    [Show full text]
  • M1 Motorway (Junctions 1-3), M25
    M1 MOTORWAY(JUNCTIONS 1-3), M25 MOTORWAYJUNCTION 23, AND A1 TRUNK ROAD TEMPORARYTRAFFIC RESTRICTIONS Notice is hereby given that Highways England Company Limited intends to make an Order on the M25 Motorway in the County of Hertfordshire and the London Boroughs of Barnet and Hendon, under Section 14(1)(a) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 because works are proposed to be executed on the road. The effect of the Order would be to authorise the overnight closure, in phases, of:- a) the entirecirculatory carriageway of the roundabout at M25 Junction 23 (A1(M)/A1); b) the roads leading to and from both carriageways of the M25 at Junction 23 (A1(M) Junction 1/A1); c) the roads leading to and from both carriageways of the A1(M)/A1 at Junction 23 (A1(M) Junction 1/A1); d) the southbound carriageway of the A1 between Bignell’sCorner (M25 Junction 23) and Borehamwood Interchange (A5135); e) the road leading from the southbound carriageway of the A1 at Borehamwood Interchange (A5135); f) the northbound carriageway of the M1 between Junction 1(A406) and the tip of the nosing of the entry slip road at Junction 3 (London Gateway Services); g) the road leading to the northbound carriageway of the M1 at Junction 1(A406); h) the road connecting to the M1 northbound entry slip road from the eastbound road connecting the EdgwareRoad roundabout to Staples Corner roundabout at Junction 1 (A406); i) theroads connecting to and from both carriageways of the M1 at Junction 2(A1); and j) all of the roads leading to and from both carriageways of the M1 at London Gateway Services.
    [Show full text]
  • The A1(M) Motorway (Junction 42 to Junction 43 and Junction 44) and the A64 Trunk Road (Temporary Prohibition of Traffic) Order 2011
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2011 No. 89 ROAD TRAFFIC The A1(M) Motorway (Junction 42 to Junction 43 and Junction 44) and the A64 Trunk Road (Temporary Prohibition of Traffic) Order 2011 Made - - - - 11 January 2011 Coming into force - - 16 January 2011 WHEREAS, the Secretary of State for Transport, being the traffic authority for the A1(M) Motorway, the A64 Trunk Road and connecting roads, in the Districts of Leeds and Selby in the Counties of West Yorkshire and North Yorkshire, is satisfied that traffic on that motorway and some of those connecting roads should be prohibited because survey, investigation and general maintenance works are proposed to be executed thereon: NOW, THEREFORE, the Secretary of State, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 14(1)(a) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984(a), makes the following Order: - 1. This Order may be cited as the A1(M) Motorway (Junction 42 to Junction 43 and Junction 44) and the A64 Trunk Road (Temporary Prohibition of Traffic) Order 2011 and shall come into force on 16 January 2011. 2. In this Order; – “the A1(M)” means the A1(M) Motorway; “the M1” means the M1 Motorway at Junction 48 (Hook Moor); “the A64” means the A64 Trunk Road “the northbound carriageway” means the A1(M) northbound carriageway from the nose of the northbound exit slip road at Junction 42 (Selby Fork) to its junction with the M1 northbound carriageway at Hook Moor (the A1(M) Junction 43), a distance of 4800 metres; “the southbound carriageway” means the A1(M) southbound carriageway from its junction with the M1
    [Show full text]
  • Prominent Car Dealership Premises
    TO LET. Unit 24, Whitby Avenue, Park Royal, London NW10 7SF. Warehouse / Industrial Unit –4,826 sq f t (448.4 sq m) including Covered Loading. Property Features. • To be fully refurbished • Fitted first floor offices • End of terrace unit • 5.63m clear height • Trade counter potential • Covered loading • Undercroft for flexible future fit out • 5 car parking spaces Location. Terms. EPC. Located within the heart of Park Royal, on the Whitby Unit 24 is available by way of a new full repairing and D:87 Avenue Industrial Estate, Whitby Avenue. Accessed insuring lease at a annual rent of £87,000 per annum from Abbey Road, within the established and sought exclusive. after Park Royal industrial area. Legal Costs. The property is conveniently located for quick and easy Business Rates. Each party to bear their own legal costs. access to the North Circular Road (A406), providing access to the M1 motorway and Western Avenue (A40) The property has a rateable value of £40,250 and is eastbound providing access to Central London and described as “warehouse & premises”. All interested VAT. westbound for the A40 / M40, M25 and M4 motorways. parties should make enquires at Brent Local Authority. Ref: 55480024000001. Rent is subject to VAT. Park Royal station (Piccadilly line), Hanger lane (Central line) and Stonebridge Park (Bakerloo line) are all within walking distance. Description. An end of terrace unit comprising 5.63m clear height rising to 7.5 at the apex, warehouse lighting, undercroft for low height storage, trade counter or welfare accommodation and fully fitted first floor offices. Goods access is via a covered loading area and single level loading door measuring 4.82m wide by 5.0 high.
    [Show full text]
  • M4 Smart Motorway Faqs
    Transport for NSW M4 Smart Motorway FAQs Here are some of our top questions about the M4 Smart Motorway project. Which motorway is the M4? The M4 Motorway is a 35km long motorway that opened in Sydney in the 1960’s. It stretches from Concord in the inner west to Lapstone in the Blue Mountains. The M4 Motorway connects to the M5 WestConnex at Haberfeld and also intersects the Westlink M7 at Eastern Creek. What is the M4 Smart The M4 Motorway will become frst smart motorway in Motorway Project? NSW with new road structures and technology being installed from Parramatta to Penrith. What is a Smart Motorway? A Smart Motorway, also known as a Managed Motorway in Victoria, use real-time information, communication and trafc control systems in and alongside the road to improve trafc fow. Variable road signs and messages communicate to drivers how to best travel along the motorway for a safer, more consistent journey with less congestion. roads-maritime.transport.nsw.gov.au Page 1 of 3 M4 Smart Motorway FAQs Where else is this technology Smart motorway technologies are being used on Melbourne’s being used in Australia? M1 motorway and introduced in southern Queensland on several roads including the Ipswich Motorway. Some individual elements of the technology are already in place on Sydney roads including the M1, M2, M5 and M7 Motorways. Has this system delivered Yes, studies have reported a signifcant reduction in improvements in other motorway incidents and improved trafc fow. On locations? Melbourne’s M1 Motorway reports have shown: • Travel times have been reduced by up to 42 percent • Crash rates have decreased by 30 percent • Vehicle emissions have been reduced by 11 percent How does the Smart There are a number of diferent parts that work together to Motorway work? ensure trafc fow and safety along the motorway.
    [Show full text]
  • Post Opening Project Evaluation M1 J10-13 HSR & Junctions
    Post Opening Project Evaluation M1 J10-13 HSR & Junctions One Year After Study October 2016 Notice Although this report was commissioned by Highways England, the findings and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Highways England. While Highways England has made every effort to ensure the information in this document is accurate, Highways England does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of that information; and it cannot accept liability for any loss or damages of any kind resulting from reliance on the information or guidance this document contains. Post Opening Project Evaluation M1 J10-13 HSR and Junctions: One Year After Study Foreword Highways England’s motorways are some of the safest in the world. Our road network carries a third of road traffic and we have seen demand grow by a quarter since 2000 with continued growth forecast. One reason for the introduction is smart motorways is because there are more vehicles on the road. By making use of the full width of the road, smart motorways add that extra capacity to carry more vehicles and ease congestion. They have evolved from Controlled Motorways (with variable speed limits) to Dynamic Hard Shoulder Running (opening the hard shoulder as a running lane to traffic at busy periods) to All Lane Running (permanently removing the hard shoulder and converting it into a running lane). Compared to a traditional motorway widening they deliver: • Increased capacity at significantly less cost than traditional motorway widening. • New technology and variable speed limits to improve traffic flow.
    [Show full text]
  • Litter Strategy Our Approach
    Litter Strategy Our approach Introduction If people didn’t drop litter, it wouldn’t have to The Department for Environment, Food and Rural be picked up. Litter on our network is not only Affairs (Defra) Code of Practice 2006 on litter and unsightly, it’s hazardous too. It can obstruct refuse (available at www.defra.gov.uk) defines litter: drivers and is a public health concern for our road workers during the clearing process, and that ‘to include materials often associated with time and money could be better spent on other smoking, eating and drinking, that are priorities. As well as economic impacts it also improperly discarded and left by members of has wider, adverse environmental concerns. the public; or spilt during business operations as well as waste management operations.’ We remain committed to delivering a high level of service for customers and communities We developed this strategy in consultation educating and informing those who drop litter with external partners such as government on our network of the consequences as we play departments, local authorities, suppliers and our part in reducing this cost to the public. other related associations to present a focused, holistic, approach to managing litter on the Our aspiration is that this strategy will help network. The strategy presents our vision, and it change the behaviours of those who drop is an approach we share openly and publicly. litter and we will continue to work with our stakeholders, suppliers and staff to achieve this. Purpose The purpose of this litter strategy is to outline how Background we can better manage litter on the network.
    [Show full text]
  • M1 Motorway (Junctions 1-4) Temporary
    M1 MOTORWAY(JUNCTIONS 1-4) TEMPORARYTRAFFIC RESTRICTIONS Notice is hereby given that Highways England Company Limited intends to make an Order on the M1 Motorway in the London Boroughs of Barnet and Harrow,under Section14(1)(a) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 because works areproposed to be executed on the road. The effect of the Order would be to authorise the phased overnight closureof:- 1) the northbound carriageway of the M1 between the commencement of the elevated section at Staples Corner circulatory (M1 Junction 1/A406) and Junction 4(A41); 2) the road leading to the northbound carriageway of the M1 at Junction 1(A406); 3) the road connecting to the M1 northbound entry slip road from the eastbound road connecting the EdgwareRoad roundabout to Staples Corner roundabout at Junction 1 (A406); 4) the fast link connecting from the southbound carriageway of the M1 to the clockwise carriageway of the A406 at Junction 1(A406); 5) the roads leading to the northbound carriageway,and from the southbound carriageway,ofthe M1 at Junction 2(A1); 6) theroads leading to and from both carriageways of the M1 at London Gateway Services, and 7) the road connecting from the southbound carriageway of the M1 to the southbound carriageway of the A41 at Junction 4(A41). These measures would be in the interests of road safety while contractors undertake bridge joint repair and all associated works. It is expected that the work would occur in several intermittent phases and last in total for approximately 8months being part of a package of works also including the M25 Junctions 26 -27 and the M11, starting on or after Monday 15th June 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Doncaster Infrastructure Strategy Annex
    SDEB28.2 DONCASTER INFRASTRUCTURE STRATEGY MEETING OUR LONG TERM INVESTMENT NEEDS ANNEX 2020 UPDATE www.doncaster.gov.uk 1 INTRODUCTION This report is the annex to the Doncaster Infrastructure Strategy main report. It amends the 2015 report with updated baseline data and scheme information. All data is a correct as at spring 2019. The Doncaster Infrastructure Strategy consists of the following sections. A main report setting out the key infrastructure needs facing the borough and how they will be addressed. An annex containing a more detailed description of the key infrastructure proposals and projects. A short summary of main findings and recommendations of the report. The main report includes a schedule of the key infrastructure projects that are required or are desirable to support Doncaster’s growth. This annex covers the following themes. 1. Transportation (strategic highways, rail transport, cycling and bus transport). 2. Education and learning (primary, secondary and further education). 3. Green infrastructure (greenspaces, green routes and biodiversity). 4. Health and social care. 5. Flooding and drainage infrastructure. 6. Community, sport and cultural facilities. 7. Energy and telecommunications. 8. Utilities (gas, electricity and waste water). This annex also highlights gaps in provision (in the absence of funding or committed projects) and looks at how these can be addressed. Copies of these documents are available from our website at www.doncaster.gov.uk/localplan. The information is accurate as of spring 2019. The Doncaster Infrastructure Strategy will be updated as new information becomes available and infrastructure proposals are confirmed in more detail. 2 CHAPTER 1: TRANSPORTATION 1.1. Strategic transport infrastructure plays a key role in supporting the economic growth of the Borough and the wider Sheffield City Region.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Review of All Lane Running Motorways in England
    Report Independent Review of All Lane Running Motorways in England Sarah Simpson Client: Hyland Reference: PC1023-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0010 Status: Final/P02.00 Date: 29 March 2021 Project related HASKONINGDHV UK LTD. Rightwell House Rightwell East Bretton Peterborough PE3 8DW Transport & Planning VAT registration number: 792428892 +44 1733 334455 T +44 1733 262243 F [email protected] E royalhaskoningdhv.com W Document title: Independent Review of All Lane Running Motorways in England Document short title: Independent Review of ALR Reference: PC1023-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0010 Status: P02.00/Final Date: 29 March 2021 Project name: PC1023 ALR Project number: PC1023 Author(s): Sarah Simpson Drafted by: Sarah Simpson Checked by: Date: 29 March 2021 Approved by: Date: Classification Project related Unless otherwise agreed with the Client, no part of this document may be reproduced or made public or used for any purpose other than that for which the document was produced. HaskoningDHV UK Ltd. accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever for this document other than towards the Client.Please note: this document contains personal data of employees of HaskoningDHV UK Ltd.. Before publication or any other way of disclosing, this report needs to be anonymized. 29 March 2021 INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF ALR PC1023-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0010 i Project related Table of Contents Glossary of Terms and Acronyms vi Smart Motorways Timeline (England) ix Core Documents x Executive Summary 1 1 Introduction and Scope of Evidence 4 1.2 Context 5 1.3 Report Scope 5 2 Methodology
    [Show full text]