DOCSLIB.ORG

M1 J28 to 35A Smart Motorway Updated Operating Regime Environmental Assessment Report (SGAR5)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
M1 J28 to 35A Smart Motorway Updated Operating Regime Environmental Assessment Report (SGAR5) M1 J28 to 35a Smart Motorway Updated Operating Regime Environmental Assessment Report (SGAR5) October 2015 1043319/ENV/PCF/2/001 Working on behalf of Highways England Document Control Document Title M1 J28 to 35a Smart Motorway Updated Operating Regime Environmental Assessment Report Author Mouchel Owner Highways England Distribution Andy Kirk (Highways England, Project Manager) Phil Barton (Mouchel, Project Director) Bill Scourfield (Mouchel, Project Manager) M1 J28 to 35a Smart Motorway Mailbox All present on the Reviewer List Document Status Final Record of Issue Version Status Author Date Checked Date Authorised Date A Draft Various 01/07/14 R. Atuah 07/07/15 A. Thornhill 07/07/15 B Draft Various 13/07/15 R. Atuah 13/07/15 A. Thornhill 13/07/15 C Draft R. Atuah 13/08/15 R. Atuah 13/08/15 A. Thornhill 13/08/15 D Draft R. Atuah 17/08/15 R. Atuah 17/08/15 A. Thornhill 17/08/15 E Draft R. Atuah 28/09/15 R. Atuah 28/09/15 A. Thornhill 28/09/15 F Final R. Atuah 19/10/15 R. Atuah 19/10/15 A. Thornhill 19/10/15 Reviewer List Name Role Andy Kirk Highways England (Project Manager) Richard Bernhardt Highways England (Regional Environmental Advisor) Approvals Name Signature Title Date of Version Issue Tony Turton Project Senior Responsible Officer (SRO) The original format of this document is copyright to Highways England 1 This page is intentionally left blank. 2 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 7 1.1 Project Overview ............................................................................................... 7 1.2 Need for an Environmental Assessment ........................................................... 8 1.3 Status of the Environmental Assessment .......................................................... 9 2 Project Background ............................................................................................. 11 2.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 11 2.2 Scheme Development and Consideration of Scheme Alternatives ................. 11 2.3 Current Investigations ..................................................................................... 12 3 The Proposed Scheme ......................................................................................... 15 3.1 Proposed Operating Regime ........................................................................... 15 3.2 The Scheme - Key SM-ALR Infrastructure ...................................................... 16 4 Overview of the Existing Environment ............................................................... 19 4.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 19 5 The Environmental Assessment Process .......................................................... 22 5.1 Scoping Process ............................................................................................. 22 5.2 Delivery of the Environmental Assessment ..................................................... 22 6 Design Changes ................................................................................................... 24 6.1 Design Change Overview ................................................................................ 24 6.2 Visual Effects .................................................................................................. 25 6.3 Ecology and Nature Conservation ................................................................... 26 6.4 Summary ......................................................................................................... 27 7 Air Quality ............................................................................................................. 29 7.1 Background and Focus of the Assessment ..................................................... 29 7.2 Regulatory / Policy Framework ....................................................................... 30 7.3 Methodology .................................................................................................... 32 7.4 Study Area and Baseline Environment ............................................................ 38 7.5 Impact Assessment ......................................................................................... 41 7.6 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................................ 45 7.7 Summary ......................................................................................................... 57 3 8 Noise and Vibration .............................................................................................. 59 8.1 Focus of the Assessment ................................................................................ 59 8.2 Regulatory / Policy Framework ....................................................................... 59 8.3 Methodology .................................................................................................... 59 8.4 Study Area and Baseline Environment ............................................................ 65 8.5 Impact Assessment ......................................................................................... 69 8.6 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures .......................................................... 74 8.7 Summary ......................................................................................................... 76 9 Recommendation on Determination and Conclusion ....................................... 80 9.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 80 9.2 Summary of Potential Effects .......................................................................... 80 9.3 Recommendation on Determination ................................................................ 81 9.4 Conclusion ...................................................................................................... 81 References ................................................................................................................... 82 Glossary of Terms ....................................................................................................... 84 Abbreviations ............................................................................................................... 89 Appendices .................................................................................................................. 93 Appendix A – Design Change Log ............................................................................. 93 Appendix B – Environmental Constraints Plan ........................................................... 93 Appendix C – Traffic Data and Hybrid Traffic Data Methodology ............................... 93 Appendix D – Air Quality Technical Report ................................................................ 93 Appendix E - Noise Technical Report ........................................................................ 93 4 List of Tables Table 2-1: Changes in Growth Factors Due to the NTM and VoT Updates ............................... 14 Table 3-1: Proposed Motorway Configuration ........................................................................... 16 Table 3-2: Key SM-ALR Infrastructure ...................................................................................... 17 Table 4-1: M1 Interconnecting Roads ....................................................................................... 21 Table 7-1: Air Quality Strategy Objectives Regulations' Objectives and 2008/50/EC Limit Values for the Pollutants of Relevance to the Current Assessment ............................................... 31 Table 7-2: Air Quality Objectives and Limit Value for the Protection of Vegetation Set in Relation to NOx ............................................................................................................................... 31 Table 7-3: Annual Average Weekday and Weekend Time Periods used in the Assessment .... 34 Table 7-4: Guideline Bands used in Determining the Significance of Local Air Quality Effects . 37 Table 7-5: List of AQMAs in the Local Air Quality Assessment Study Area ............................... 39 Table 7-6: Geographical Breakdown of Modelled Base Year Annual Mean NO 2 Results in Exceedence of AQS Objective .......................................................................................... 41 Table 7-7: Local Air Quality Receptors Informing Scheme Significance – 70mph SM-ALR (2017) .......................................................................................................................................... 43 Table 7-8: Geographical Distribution of Significant Air Quality Impacts of the Proposed Scheme .......................................................................................................................................... 44 Table 7-9: Local Air Quality Receptors Informing Mitigated Operating Regime Significance (2017) .......................................................................................................................................... 47 Table 7-10: Geographical Distribution of Significant Impacts of the Mitigated Operating Regime .......................................................................................................................................... 48 Table 7-11: Local Air Quality Results for PM 10 .........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Call for Sites 2021 Justification Statement V3
    Planning Justification Statement Representation to Hertsmere Local Plan Process Commercial Redevelopment Land and Buildings at the Mercure Hotel Watford, A41 Bypass WD25 8JH March 2021 Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. The Site 4 3. The Proposal 7 4. Exceptional Circumstances 12 5. Economic Need 16 6. Green Belt and Landscape 25 7. Transport and Accessibility 31 8. Flood Risk 34 9. Ecology and Trees 37 10. Heritage 40 11. Other Technical Matters 41 12. Case of Exceptional Circumstances 43 13. Conclusion 51 Appendix A: Site Planning History 1 1. Introduction This Planning Justification Statement is submitted by Warner Planning on behalf of Regen Properties LLP. This submission is made to the Hertsmere Borough Council 'Employment Land Call for Sites' 2021. We promote land and buildings at the Mercure Hotel Watford, A41 Bypass WD25 8JH for allocation for B8 with ancillary B1 commercial development. The hotel has been struggling for several years, which has been further compounded by the Covid-19 Pandemic, and the hotel is due to close in late 2021/early 2022. This statement, therefore, provides representations in respect of the whole site, including the hotel buildings and the land to the south-east of the building, which is part of the same plot. Through this statement, we will demonstrate that this is a credible and deliverable opportunity with no technical issues. This submission is supported by a wealth of technical reports, including: • Masterplans – UMC • Economic Benefits Assessment - Lichfields • Landscape Visual Overview – CSA Environmental • Ecology Overview- CSA Environmental • Aboricultural Assessment – DCCLA • Flood Risk and Drainage Apprisal – EAS • Transport Review – EAS • Desk Based Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment – TRC • This Statement – Warner Planning • Market Report – Knight Frank • Employment Call for Sites Submission Form There are limited alternatives to this proposal.
    [Show full text]
  • 160 Great Britain for Updates, Visit Wigan 27 28
    160 Great Britain For Updates, visit www.routex.com Wigan 27 28 Birkenhead Liverpool M62 36 Manchester Stockport M56 Mold Chester 35 Congleton Wrexham 59 M6 Shrewsbury 64 65 07 Wolverhampton Walsall West Bromwich Llandrindod Birmingham Wells Solihull M6 03 Coventry Warwick02 Carmarthen Hereford 01 51 60 Neath M5 Swansea 06 Pontypridd Bridgend Caerphilly Newport Cardiff M4 13 Barry Swindon M5 Bristol 61 14 Weston-super-Mare Kingswood 31 Bath 32 M4 05 Trowbridge 62 Newbury Taunton M5 20 Yeovil Winchester Exeter Southampton 55 Exmouth M27 Poole Lymington Bournemouth Plymouth Torbay Newport GB_Landkarte.indd 160 05.11.12 12:44 Great Britain 161 Wakefield 16 Huddersfield Hull Barnsley Doncaster Scunthorpe Grimsby Rotherham Sheffield M1 Louth 47M1 Heanor Derby Nottingham 48 24 Grantham 15 Loughborough 42 King's Leicester Lynn 39 40 Aylsham Peterborough Coventry Norwich GB 46 01 Warwick Huntingdon Thetford Lowestoft 45 M1 Northampton 02 43 44 Cambridge Milton Bedford Keynes Biggleswade Sawston 18 M40 19 Ipswich Luton Aylesbury Oxford Felixstowe Hertford 21 50 M25 M11 Chelmsford 61 30 53 52 Slough London Bracknell Southend-on-Sea Newbury Grays 54 Wokingham 29 Rochester Basingstoke 22 M3 Guildford M2 M25 Maidstone Winchester 23 M20 17 M27 Portsmouth Chichester Brighton La Manche Calais Newport A16 A26 Boulogne-sur-Mer GB_Landkarte.indd 161 05.11.12 12:44 162 Great Britain Forfar Perth Dundee 58 Stirling Alloa 34 Greenock M90 Dumbarton Kirkintilloch Dunfermline 57 Falkirk Glasgow Paisley Livingston Edinburgh Newton M8 Haddington Mearns 04 56 Dalkeith 26 Irvine Kilmarnock Ayr Hawick A74(M) 41 Dumfries 25 Morpeth Newcastle Carlisle Upon Whitley Bay 12Tyne 08 South Shields Gateshead 09 11 Durham 49 Redcar 33 Stockton-on-Tees M6 Middlesbrough 10 38 M6 A1(M) 37 Harrogate York 63 M65 Bradford Leeds Beverley M6 28 M62 Wakefield Wigan 16 27 Huddersfield Birkenhead Liverpool Manchester Barnsley M62 Scunthorpe 35 36Stockport Doncaster Rotherham Sheffield GB_Landkarte.indd 162 05.11.12 12:44 Great Britain 163 GPS Nr.
    [Show full text]
  • The M1 Motorway (Junctions 5 – 6A
    THE M1 MOTORWAY(JUNCTIONS 5–6A) TEMPORARYOVERNIGHT CLOSURES Notice is hereby given that Highways England Company Limited(a) intends to make an Order on the M1 Motorway,inthe County of Hertfordshire, under Section 14(1)(a) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 because works areproposed to be executed on the road. The effect of the Order would be to authorise the overnight closureofthe following – (a) the slip roads leading to and from both carriageways of the M1 at Junction 5(A41, A4008); (b) the slip roads leading to and from both carriageways of the M1 at Junction 6(A405); and (c) the link road leading from the southbound carriageway of the M1 at Junction 6A to both carriageways of the M25 at Junction 21. These measures would be in the interest of road safety to enable contractors to undertake cyclical maintenance work. It is expected that the work would take place for approximately 1-2nights for each closureat(a) –(c) above every two months at the following times: Monday-Thursday nights 22:00 –05:30 Friday nights 23:00 –06:00 Saturday nights 22:00 –06:00 Sunday nights 22:30 –05:30 The Order would come into force on 1August2017 and have amaximum duration of twelve months. During the closures outlined above, traffic affected would be diverted using other junctions of the M1, the A41, the A405 and the A410. The slip road closures, link road closureand diversion routes would be clearly indicated by traffic signs throughout the works periods. MTaylor, an official of Highways England Company Limited Ref: HA/M1/35/3/1894 (a)Registered in England and Wales under company no.
    [Show full text]
  • M1 Motorway (Junctions 1-3), M25
    M1 MOTORWAY(JUNCTIONS 1-3), M25 MOTORWAYJUNCTION 23, AND A1 TRUNK ROAD TEMPORARYTRAFFIC RESTRICTIONS Notice is hereby given that Highways England Company Limited intends to make an Order on the M25 Motorway in the County of Hertfordshire and the London Boroughs of Barnet and Hendon, under Section 14(1)(a) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 because works are proposed to be executed on the road. The effect of the Order would be to authorise the overnight closure, in phases, of:- a) the entirecirculatory carriageway of the roundabout at M25 Junction 23 (A1(M)/A1); b) the roads leading to and from both carriageways of the M25 at Junction 23 (A1(M) Junction 1/A1); c) the roads leading to and from both carriageways of the A1(M)/A1 at Junction 23 (A1(M) Junction 1/A1); d) the southbound carriageway of the A1 between Bignell’sCorner (M25 Junction 23) and Borehamwood Interchange (A5135); e) the road leading from the southbound carriageway of the A1 at Borehamwood Interchange (A5135); f) the northbound carriageway of the M1 between Junction 1(A406) and the tip of the nosing of the entry slip road at Junction 3 (London Gateway Services); g) the road leading to the northbound carriageway of the M1 at Junction 1(A406); h) the road connecting to the M1 northbound entry slip road from the eastbound road connecting the EdgwareRoad roundabout to Staples Corner roundabout at Junction 1 (A406); i) theroads connecting to and from both carriageways of the M1 at Junction 2(A1); and j) all of the roads leading to and from both carriageways of the M1 at London Gateway Services.
    [Show full text]
  • The A1(M) Motorway (Junction 42 to Junction 43 and Junction 44) and the A64 Trunk Road (Temporary Prohibition of Traffic) Order 2011
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2011 No. 89 ROAD TRAFFIC The A1(M) Motorway (Junction 42 to Junction 43 and Junction 44) and the A64 Trunk Road (Temporary Prohibition of Traffic) Order 2011 Made - - - - 11 January 2011 Coming into force - - 16 January 2011 WHEREAS, the Secretary of State for Transport, being the traffic authority for the A1(M) Motorway, the A64 Trunk Road and connecting roads, in the Districts of Leeds and Selby in the Counties of West Yorkshire and North Yorkshire, is satisfied that traffic on that motorway and some of those connecting roads should be prohibited because survey, investigation and general maintenance works are proposed to be executed thereon: NOW, THEREFORE, the Secretary of State, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 14(1)(a) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984(a), makes the following Order: - 1. This Order may be cited as the A1(M) Motorway (Junction 42 to Junction 43 and Junction 44) and the A64 Trunk Road (Temporary Prohibition of Traffic) Order 2011 and shall come into force on 16 January 2011. 2. In this Order; – “the A1(M)” means the A1(M) Motorway; “the M1” means the M1 Motorway at Junction 48 (Hook Moor); “the A64” means the A64 Trunk Road “the northbound carriageway” means the A1(M) northbound carriageway from the nose of the northbound exit slip road at Junction 42 (Selby Fork) to its junction with the M1 northbound carriageway at Hook Moor (the A1(M) Junction 43), a distance of 4800 metres; “the southbound carriageway” means the A1(M) southbound carriageway from its junction with the M1
    [Show full text]
  • Reservoir Released Waves As a Transient Riverine Pollution Mitigation Tool
    Reservoir Released Waves as a Transient Riverine Pollution Mitigation Tool An examination of the feasibility of using waves of water released from a reservoir as a response to pollution spills. Simon DeSmet Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of Geography December 2014 - ii - The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his/her own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. © 2014 The University of Leeds and Simon DeSmet - iii - Acknowledgements I have depended on God and faith to carry me though the preparation of this Thesis. A number of individuals have been of great assistance over the past few years. Firstly my two primary supervisors Dr Paul Kay and Dr Jonathan Carrivick have been immensely patient, taught me to write properly, vetted my ideas and have provided great wisdom and experience. Technical assistance with the Fluent software was provided by Dr Andy Sleigh and Dr Carl Gikeson. Access to the SORBY flume facility and input on ideas for the flume study were given by Dr Daniel Parsons and Dr Gareth Keevil. For help in designing the field study and collecting the data I would like to thank David Ashley, Rachel Gasior, Dr Pengfei Li, Dr Ben Gillespie and numerous individuals a the Environment Agency. Additionally I owe a thanks to Rachel Homer for assistance with statistics.
    [Show full text]
  • Prominent Car Dealership Premises
    TO LET. Unit 24, Whitby Avenue, Park Royal, London NW10 7SF. Warehouse / Industrial Unit –4,826 sq f t (448.4 sq m) including Covered Loading. Property Features. • To be fully refurbished • Fitted first floor offices • End of terrace unit • 5.63m clear height • Trade counter potential • Covered loading • Undercroft for flexible future fit out • 5 car parking spaces Location. Terms. EPC. Located within the heart of Park Royal, on the Whitby Unit 24 is available by way of a new full repairing and D:87 Avenue Industrial Estate, Whitby Avenue. Accessed insuring lease at a annual rent of £87,000 per annum from Abbey Road, within the established and sought exclusive. after Park Royal industrial area. Legal Costs. The property is conveniently located for quick and easy Business Rates. Each party to bear their own legal costs. access to the North Circular Road (A406), providing access to the M1 motorway and Western Avenue (A40) The property has a rateable value of £40,250 and is eastbound providing access to Central London and described as “warehouse & premises”. All interested VAT. westbound for the A40 / M40, M25 and M4 motorways. parties should make enquires at Brent Local Authority. Ref: 55480024000001. Rent is subject to VAT. Park Royal station (Piccadilly line), Hanger lane (Central line) and Stonebridge Park (Bakerloo line) are all within walking distance. Description. An end of terrace unit comprising 5.63m clear height rising to 7.5 at the apex, warehouse lighting, undercroft for low height storage, trade counter or welfare accommodation and fully fitted first floor offices. Goods access is via a covered loading area and single level loading door measuring 4.82m wide by 5.0 high.
    [Show full text]
  • M4 Smart Motorway Faqs
    Transport for NSW M4 Smart Motorway FAQs Here are some of our top questions about the M4 Smart Motorway project. Which motorway is the M4? The M4 Motorway is a 35km long motorway that opened in Sydney in the 1960’s. It stretches from Concord in the inner west to Lapstone in the Blue Mountains. The M4 Motorway connects to the M5 WestConnex at Haberfeld and also intersects the Westlink M7 at Eastern Creek. What is the M4 Smart The M4 Motorway will become frst smart motorway in Motorway Project? NSW with new road structures and technology being installed from Parramatta to Penrith. What is a Smart Motorway? A Smart Motorway, also known as a Managed Motorway in Victoria, use real-time information, communication and trafc control systems in and alongside the road to improve trafc fow. Variable road signs and messages communicate to drivers how to best travel along the motorway for a safer, more consistent journey with less congestion. roads-maritime.transport.nsw.gov.au Page 1 of 3 M4 Smart Motorway FAQs Where else is this technology Smart motorway technologies are being used on Melbourne’s being used in Australia? M1 motorway and introduced in southern Queensland on several roads including the Ipswich Motorway. Some individual elements of the technology are already in place on Sydney roads including the M1, M2, M5 and M7 Motorways. Has this system delivered Yes, studies have reported a signifcant reduction in improvements in other motorway incidents and improved trafc fow. On locations? Melbourne’s M1 Motorway reports have shown: • Travel times have been reduced by up to 42 percent • Crash rates have decreased by 30 percent • Vehicle emissions have been reduced by 11 percent How does the Smart There are a number of diferent parts that work together to Motorway work? ensure trafc fow and safety along the motorway.
    [Show full text]
  • Post Opening Project Evaluation M1 J10-13 HSR & Junctions
    Post Opening Project Evaluation M1 J10-13 HSR & Junctions One Year After Study October 2016 Notice Although this report was commissioned by Highways England, the findings and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Highways England. While Highways England has made every effort to ensure the information in this document is accurate, Highways England does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of that information; and it cannot accept liability for any loss or damages of any kind resulting from reliance on the information or guidance this document contains. Post Opening Project Evaluation M1 J10-13 HSR and Junctions: One Year After Study Foreword Highways England’s motorways are some of the safest in the world. Our road network carries a third of road traffic and we have seen demand grow by a quarter since 2000 with continued growth forecast. One reason for the introduction is smart motorways is because there are more vehicles on the road. By making use of the full width of the road, smart motorways add that extra capacity to carry more vehicles and ease congestion. They have evolved from Controlled Motorways (with variable speed limits) to Dynamic Hard Shoulder Running (opening the hard shoulder as a running lane to traffic at busy periods) to All Lane Running (permanently removing the hard shoulder and converting it into a running lane). Compared to a traditional motorway widening they deliver: • Increased capacity at significantly less cost than traditional motorway widening. • New technology and variable speed limits to improve traffic flow.
    [Show full text]
  • South Yorkshire
    INDUSTRIAL HISTORY of SOUTH RKSHI E Association for Industrial Archaeology CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 6 STEEL 26 10 TEXTILE 2 FARMING, FOOD AND The cementation process 26 Wool 53 DRINK, WOODLANDS Crucible steel 27 Cotton 54 Land drainage 4 Wire 29 Linen weaving 54 Farm Engine houses 4 The 19thC steel revolution 31 Artificial fibres 55 Corn milling 5 Alloy steels 32 Clothing 55 Water Corn Mills 5 Forging and rolling 33 11 OTHER MANUFACTUR- Windmills 6 Magnets 34 ING INDUSTRIES Steam corn mills 6 Don Valley & Sheffield maps 35 Chemicals 56 Other foods 6 South Yorkshire map 36-7 Upholstery 57 Maltings 7 7 ENGINEERING AND Tanning 57 Breweries 7 VEHICLES 38 Paper 57 Snuff 8 Engineering 38 Printing 58 Woodlands and timber 8 Ships and boats 40 12 GAS, ELECTRICITY, 3 COAL 9 Railway vehicles 40 SEWERAGE Coal settlements 14 Road vehicles 41 Gas 59 4 OTHER MINERALS AND 8 CUTLERY AND Electricity 59 MINERAL PRODUCTS 15 SILVERWARE 42 Water 60 Lime 15 Cutlery 42 Sewerage 61 Ruddle 16 Hand forges 42 13 TRANSPORT Bricks 16 Water power 43 Roads 62 Fireclay 16 Workshops 44 Canals 64 Pottery 17 Silverware 45 Tramroads 65 Glass 17 Other products 48 Railways 66 5 IRON 19 Handles and scales 48 Town Trams 68 Iron mining 19 9 EDGE TOOLS Other road transport 68 Foundries 22 Agricultural tools 49 14 MUSEUMS 69 Wrought iron and water power 23 Other Edge Tools and Files 50 Index 70 Further reading 71 USING THIS BOOK South Yorkshire has a long history of industry including water power, iron, steel, engineering, coal, textiles, and glass.
    [Show full text]
  • Litter Strategy Our Approach
    Litter Strategy Our approach Introduction If people didn’t drop litter, it wouldn’t have to The Department for Environment, Food and Rural be picked up. Litter on our network is not only Affairs (Defra) Code of Practice 2006 on litter and unsightly, it’s hazardous too. It can obstruct refuse (available at www.defra.gov.uk) defines litter: drivers and is a public health concern for our road workers during the clearing process, and that ‘to include materials often associated with time and money could be better spent on other smoking, eating and drinking, that are priorities. As well as economic impacts it also improperly discarded and left by members of has wider, adverse environmental concerns. the public; or spilt during business operations as well as waste management operations.’ We remain committed to delivering a high level of service for customers and communities We developed this strategy in consultation educating and informing those who drop litter with external partners such as government on our network of the consequences as we play departments, local authorities, suppliers and our part in reducing this cost to the public. other related associations to present a focused, holistic, approach to managing litter on the Our aspiration is that this strategy will help network. The strategy presents our vision, and it change the behaviours of those who drop is an approach we share openly and publicly. litter and we will continue to work with our stakeholders, suppliers and staff to achieve this. Purpose The purpose of this litter strategy is to outline how Background we can better manage litter on the network.
    [Show full text]
  • Photography Competition
    Institution of Civil Engineers Yorkshire and Humber Photography Competition 2017 In 2018 the Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE) turns 200. Help us celebrate some of the civil engineering projects and schemes that have had the greatest impact on people’s lives over the past 200 years. The ICE Yorkshire and Humber photography competition is a showcase for the very best digital photography of the built environment in in the region and is open to both professional and amateur photographers. All the shortlisted entries will be used in a web gallery and form part of an exhibition in public spaces around the region, giving acknowledgements where they are used. There are also three cash prizes. How to enter To be in with a chance of winning, select one or more subjects from either of the lists of civil engineering projects below, and submit your image(s). Please see full conditions of entry. Does the image suitably capture the subject and emphasise the impact it has had on people’s lives? You may also wish to consider elements such as lighting, focus, composition and use of colour. Shortlisted entries will be displayed in a public exhibition, celebrating 200 years of civil engineering. Cash prizes to be won. Entry closes: 31 October 2017 Conditions of entry 1 Entry is open to ICE members and non-members. 2 The subject must be selected from either of the lists of projects below. 3 Images should be a minimum of 1,500x2,000 pixels, submitted in jpg format and named as follows: Name of image_first name of photographer_lastname.jpg e.g.
    [Show full text]