Motor Cortex and Hand Motor Skills: Structural Compliance in the Human Brain

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

r Human Brain Mapping 5:206–215(1997) r Motor Cortex and Hand Motor Skills: Structural Compliance in the Human Brain Katrin Amunts,1* Gottfried Schlaug,2* Lutz Ja¨ncke,3 Helmuth Steinmetz,4 Axel Schleicher,1 Andreas Dabringhaus,1 and Karl Zilles1 1C. & O. Vogt Brain Research Institute, Heinrich Heine University, Du¨sseldorf, Germany 2Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 3Institute of Medicine, Research Center Ju¨lich, Ju¨lich, Germany 4Department of Neurology, Heinrich Heine University, Du¨sseldorf, Germany r r Abstract: Recent studies in humans and nonhuman primates have shown that the functional organization of the human sensorimotor cortex changes following sensory stimulation or following the acquisition of motor skills. It is unknown whether functional plasticity in response to the acquisition of new motor skills and the continued performance of complicated bimanual movements for years is associated with structural changes in the organization of the motor cortex. Professional musicians, especially keyboard and string players, are a prototypical group for investigating these changes in the human brain. Using magnetic resonance images, we measured the length of the posterior wall of the precentral gyrus bordering the central sulcus (intrasulcal length of the precentral gyrus, ILPG) in horizontal sections through both hemispheres of right-handed keyboard players and of an age- and handedness-matched control group. Lacking a direct in vivo measurement of the primary motor cortex in humans, we assumed that the ILPG is a measure of the size of the primary motor cortex. Left-right asymmetry in the ILPG was analyzed and compared between both groups. Whereas controls exhibited a pronounced left-larger-than-right asymme- try, keyboard players had more symmetrical ILPG. The most pronounced differences in ILPG between keyboard players and controls were seen in the most dorsal part of the presumed cortical hand representation of both hemispheres. This was especially true in the nondominant right hemispheres. The size of the ILPG was negatively correlated with age of commencement of musical training in keyboard players, supporting our hypothesis that the human motor cortex can exhibit functionally induced and long-lasting structural adaptations. Hum. Brain Mapping 5:206–215, 1997. r 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Key words: human motor cortex; asymmetry; plasticity; handedness; MRI; musicians; hand motor skill r r INTRODUCTION Electrophysiological and neuroimaging studies in Contract Grant sponsor: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Con- humans revealed adaptive changes in the cortical tract Grant number: SFB 199, A6. motor hand representations in response to learning *Correspondence to: Katrin Amunts, C. & O. Vogt Brain Research and the acquirement of new motor skills [Jenkins et al., Institute, Heinrich Heine University, Du¨ sseldorf, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] or Gottfried Schlaug, Dept. of Neu- 1994; Pascual-Leone et al., 1993, 1995a,b; Schlaug et al., rology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, 1994; Karni et al., 1995]. Similar functional changes Boston, MA 02215, USA. E-mail: [email protected] have been reported after stimulation of primary so- Received for publication 22 January 1997; accepted 10 April 1997 matosensory and motor areas in nonhuman primates r 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc. r Motor Cortex and Hand Motor Skills r and cats [Merzenich et al., 1988; Recanzone et al., 1990; Encouraged by our previous findings and by the Jacobs and Donoghue, 1991; Nudo et al., 1992; Wang et results of Elbert et al. [1995] and Schlaug et al. [1995b], al., 1995]. Pascual-Leone et al. [1995a] showed that we wanted to investigate whether the early commence- over the course of 5 days, as subjects learned a ment and long duration of motor learning and practice five-finger exercise on the piano, the cortical motor of complex bimanual finger movements in musicians areas targeting the long finger flexor and extensor might lead to persistent, macrostructural adaptations muscles enlarged. Others suggested that the early within the motor cortex, which may underlie the acquirement of fine sensorimotor skills leads to lasting representational plasticity observed in persons while functional changes, such as having a larger sensory acquiring and continuously performing fine motor finger representation in string players [Elbert et al., skills [Pascual-Leone et al., 1993, 1995a,b; Schlaug et 1995]. The underlying neurophysiological changes are al., 1994]. still a matter of intense research. Possible modifica- There is also previous evidence that the primary tions could include a strengthening of existing syn- motor cortex might show a structural correlate of apses, the formation of new synapses, or recruitment handedness. Several groups [White et al., 1994; Foundas of cortical tissue into the activated cortex that was et al., 1995; Amunts et al., 1996] have shown that previously not recruited [Donoghue and Sanes, 1988; estimates of the primary motor cortex revealed a Merzenich et al., 1988; Recanzone et al., 1990; Jacobs left-larger-than-right motor cortex size in right-handed and Donoghue, 1991; Nudo et al., 1992; Pascual-Leone subjects. While right-handers showed a left-larger-than- et al., 1993, 1995a,b; Karni et al., 1995; Jones et al., 1996; right motor cortex size (as indexed by the ILPG), Kleim et al., 1996]. left-handers showed a right-larger-than-left ILPG In a previous study, we found evidence for struc- [Amunts et al., 1996]. These interhemispheric asymme- tural adaptations in the interhemispheric connectivity tries were thought to represent structural correlates of of frontal motor-related regions between musicians handedness. A similar suggestion was made on the with a different commencement of musical training. basis of results from a postmortem study on human The anterior corpus callosum was larger in musicians brains with unknown handedness [White et al., 1994]. with an early commencement of musical training In roughly 2/3 of these brains, the left central sulcus (before age 7) compared to musicians starting later was deeper than the right. In this regard, it is also (after age 7) and right-handed controls [Schlaug et al., important that several studies have found evidence 1995a]. Since this structural difference was seen in that handedness and distal hand motor skills are much musicians with an early commencement of musical more symmetrical in professional musicians [Christ- training, it was argued that this might represent a man, 1993; Schlaug et al., 1995a; Waldron and Anton, structural cerebral adaptation (e.g., thicker myelinated 1995]. transcallosal fibers or a greater amount of transcallosal On the basis of all these findings we hypothesized fibers) which have been triggered by a requirement for that the size of cortical motor areas could differ performing and continuously practicing complicated between musicians with a history of intense bimanual bimanual finger movements. These results indicated hand skill training and appropriate nonmusician con- that the corpus callosum underwent an adaptation in trols. In this study, we attempted to answer the the young brain which seemed to coincide with the following questions: 1) Do keyboard players exhibit a late myelination of the corpus callosum [Yakovlev and more symmetrical cortical motor hand representation Lecours, 1967]. Since late-beginning musicians (some area as indexed by the ILPG than right-handed con- of the musicians in this study were quite accomplished trols? 2) If musicians indeed differ from controls, are performers) did not show this anatomical difference these differences correlated with the age of commence- and as a matter of fact did not differ significantly from ment of musical and motor training? a right-handed nonmusician control group, a selec- tional hypothesis (e.g., a larger anterior corpus callo- MATERIALS AND METHODS sum would endow a child to become skilled at playing a musical instrument at a young age) was deemed to Subjects be less likely to explain these anatomical differences. A selectional hypothesis would explain the structural The study was performed on male, right-handed differences in the brains of musicians compared with professional musicians. They were recruited from three controls as an effect of a selection of people with, for music conservatories as well as through personal example, larger corpora callosa inherent in the de- contacts. All of them were actively performing, classi- mands of musical training and competition. cally trained musicians who had either finished their r 207 r r Amunts et al. r education or were still students at a music school. No white matter, but excluding voxels that would corre- amateur musicians were included. All musicians were spond to cerebrospinal fluid. keyboard players, with 9 of them playing string instru- The MR volumes were spatially oriented and normal- ments in addition. These professional male musicians ized in the computerized Human Brain Atlas, whereby (n 5 21; mean age 5 26.9 years, SD 5 4.6) were com- only linear transformations were applied (for details pared to an age- and handedness-matched male con- concerning the Human Brain Atlas, see Roland and trol group (n 5 30; mean age 5 26.4 years, SD 5 3.9). Zilles [1994]). Normalization was performed in order The control subjects in this study were either nonmusi- to exclude the influence of intersubject variability in cians who had never played a musical instrument or absolute brain size when determining intrasulcal controls who had played an instrument for less than 1 lengths. All brains were spatially oriented according to year after age 10 (the latter group comprised about 1/3 the coordinate system of Talairach and Tournoux of our subjects). We will refer to this group as the [1988], which enabled us to perform the analyses on nonmusician control group. The control group did not horizontal sections which were parallel to the plane include professional typists, although some used type- determined by the anterior and posterior commissures writers and computer keyboards for personal commu- (AC-PC plane).
Recommended publications
  • (Mpfc-Lpmc) Affects Subjective Beauty but Not Ugliness

    (Mpfc-Lpmc) Affects Subjective Beauty but Not Ugliness

    ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 08 December 2015 doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00654 Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Medial Prefrontal Cortex and Left Primary Motor Cortex (mPFC-lPMC) Affects Subjective Beauty but not Ugliness Koyo Nakamura1 and Hideaki Kawabata2* 1 Graduate School of Human Relations, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan, 2 Department of Psychology, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan Neuroaesthetics has been searching for the neural bases of the subjective experience of beauty. It has been demonstrated that neural activities in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and the left primary motor cortex (lPMC) correlate with the subjective experience of beauty. Although beauty and ugliness seem to be semantically and conceptually opposite, it is still unknown whether these two evaluations represent extreme opposites in unitary or bivariate dimensions. In this study, we applied transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to examine whether non-invasive brain stimulation modulates two types of esthetic evaluation; evaluating beauty and ugliness. Participants rated the Edited by: subjective beauty and ugliness of abstract paintings before and after the application of Edward A. Vessel, tDCS. Application of cathodal tDCS over the mPFC with anode electrode over the lPMC, New York University, USA which induced temporal inhibition of neural excitability of the mPFC, led to a decrease Reviewed by: Zaira Cattaneo, in beauty ratings but not ugliness ratings. There were no changes in ratings of both University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy beauty and ugliness when applying anodal tDCS or sham stimulation over the mPFC. Andrea Antal, Results from our experiment indicate that the mPFC and the lPMC have a causal role University Medical Center Goettingen, Germany in generating the subjective experience of beauty, with beauty and ugliness evaluations Gerald Cupchik, constituting two distinct dimensions.
  • Basal Ganglia Anatomy, Physiology, and Function Ns201c

    Basal Ganglia Anatomy, Physiology, and Function Ns201c

    Basal Ganglia Anatomy, Physiology, and Function NS201c Human Basal Ganglia Anatomy Basal Ganglia Circuits: The ‘Classical’ Model of Direct and Indirect Pathway Function Motor Cortex Premotor Cortex + Glutamate Striatum GPe GPi/SNr Dopamine + - GABA - Motor Thalamus SNc STN Analagous rodent basal ganglia nuclei Gross anatomy of the striatum: gateway to the basal ganglia rodent Dorsomedial striatum: -Inputs predominantly from mPFC, thalamus, VTA Dorsolateral striatum: -Inputs from sensorimotor cortex, thalamus, SNc Ventral striatum: Striatal subregions: Dorsomedial (caudate) -Inputs from vPFC, hippocampus, amygdala, Dorsolateral (putamen) thalamus, VTA Ventral (nucleus accumbens) Gross anatomy of the striatum: patch and matrix compartments Patch/Striosome: -substance P -mu-opioid receptor Matrix: -ChAT and AChE -somatostatin Microanatomy of the striatum: cell types Projection neurons: MSN: medium spiny neuron (GABA) •striatonigral projecting – ‘direct pathway’ •striatopallidal projecting – ‘indirect pathway’ Interneurons: FS: fast-spiking interneuron (GABA) LTS: low-threshold spiking interneuron (GABA) LA: large aspiny neuron (ACh) 30 um Cellular properties of striatal neurons Microanatomy of the striatum: striatal microcircuits • Feedforward inhibition (mediated by fast-spiking interneurons) • Lateral feedback inhibition (mediated by MSN collaterals) Basal Ganglia Circuits: The ‘Classical’ Model of Direct and Indirect Pathway Function Motor Cortex Premotor Cortex + Glutamate Striatum GPe GPi/SNr Dopamine + - GABA - Motor Thalamus SNc STN The simplified ‘classical’ model of basal ganglia circuit function • Information encoded as firing rate • Basal ganglia circuit is linear and unidirectional • Dopamine exerts opposing effects on direct and indirect pathway MSNs Basal ganglia motor circuit: direct pathway Motor Cortex Premotor Cortex Glutamate Striatum GPe GPi/SNr Dopamine + GABA Motor Thalamus SNc STN Direct pathway MSNs express: D1, M4 receptors, Sub.
  • Function of Cerebral Cortex

    Function of Cerebral Cortex

    FUNCTION OF CEREBRAL CORTEX Course: Neuropsychology CC-6 (M.A PSYCHOLOGY SEM II); Unit I By Dr. Priyanka Kumari Assistant Professor Institute of Psychological Research and Service Patna University Contact No.7654991023; E-mail- [email protected] The cerebral cortex—the thin outer covering of the brain-is the part of the brain responsible for our ability to reason, plan, remember, and imagine. Cerebral Cortex accounts for our impressive capacity to process and transform information. The cerebral cortex is only about one-eighth of an inch thick, but it contains billions of neurons, each connected to thousands of others. The predominance of cell bodies gives the cortex a brownish gray colour. Because of its appearance, the cortex is often referred to as gray matter. Beneath the cortex are myelin-sheathed axons connecting the neurons of the cortex with those of other parts of the brain. The large concentrations of myelin make this tissue look whitish and opaque, and hence it is often referred to as white matter. The cortex is divided into two nearly symmetrical halves, the cerebral hemispheres . Thus, many of the structures of the cerebral cortex appear in both the left and right cerebral hemispheres. The two hemispheres appear to be somewhat specialized in the functions they perform. The cerebral hemispheres are folded into many ridges and grooves, which greatly increase their surface area. Each hemisphere is usually described, on the basis of the largest of these grooves or fissures, as being divided into four distinct regions or lobes. The four lobes are: • Frontal, • Parietal, • Occipital, and • Temporal.
  • The Prefrontal Cortex

    The Prefrontal Cortex

    Avens Publishing Group Inviting Innovations Open Access Review Article J Hum Anat Physiol July 2017 Volume:1, Issue:1 © All rights are reserved by Ogeturk. AvensJournal Publishing of Group Inviting Innovations Human Anatomy The Prefrontal Cortex: A Basic & Physiology Embryological, Histological, Anatomical, and Functional Ramazan Fazıl Akkoc and Murat Ogeturk* Department of Anatomy, Firat University, Turkey Guideline *Address for Correspondence Murat Ogeturk, Firat University, Faculty of Medicine, 23119 Elazig, Turkey, Tel: +90-424-2370000 (ext: 4654); Fax: +90-424-2379138; Keywords: Prefrontal cortex; Working memory; Frontal lobe E-Mail: [email protected] Abstract Submission: 24 May, 2017 Accepted: 11 July, 2017 The prefrontal cortex (PFC) unites, processes and controls the Published: 19 August, 2017 information coming from cortex and subcortical structures, and Copyright: © 2017 Akkoc RF. This is an open access article distributed decides and executes goal-oriented behavior. A major function of PFC under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits is to maintain the attention. Furthermore, it has many other functions unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided including working memory, problem solving, graciousness, memory, the original work is properly cited. and intellectuality. PFC is well developed in humans and localized to the anterior of the frontal lobe. This article presents a systematic review and detailed summary of embryology, histology, anatomy, functions and lesions of PFC. I. Lamina zonalis: Contains few Cajal horizontal cells. The axons of Martinotti cells located at deep layers, the last branches of the apical dendrites of pyramidal cells, and the last branches Introduction of the afferent nerve fibers extend to this lamina.
  • Neuroaesthetics of Art Vision: an Experimental Approach to the Sense of Beauty

    Neuroaesthetics of Art Vision: an Experimental Approach to the Sense of Beauty

    Cl n l of i ica a l T rn r u ia o l s J ISSN: 2167-0870 Journal of Clinical Trials Research Article Neuroaesthetics of Art Vision: An Experimental Approach to the Sense of Beauty Maddalena Coccagna1, PietroAvanzini2, Mariagrazia Portera4, Giovanni Vecchiato2, Maddalena Fabbri Destro2, AlessandroVittorio Sironi3,9, Fabrizio Salvi8, Andrea Gatti5, Filippo Domenicali5, Raffaella Folgieri3,6, Annalisa Banzi3, Caselli Elisabetta1, Luca Lanzoni1, Volta Antonella1, Matteo Bisi1, Silvia Cesari1, Arianna Vivarelli1, Giorgio Balboni Pier1, Giuseppe Santangelo Camillo1, Giovanni Sassu7, Sante Mazzacane1* 1Department of CIAS Interdepartmental Research Center, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy;2Department of CNR Neuroscience Institute, Parma, Italy;3Department of CESPEB Neuroaesthetics Laboratory, University Bicocca, Milan, Italy;4Department of Letters and Philosophy, University of Florence, Italy;5Department of Humanistic Studies, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy;6Department of Philosophy Piero Martinetti, University La Statale, Milan, Italy;7Department of Musei Arte Antica, Ferrara, Italy;8Department of Neurological Sciences, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy;9Department of Centre of the history of Biomedical Thought, University Bicocca, Milan, Italy ABSTRACT Objective: NEVArt research aims to study the correlation between a set of neurophysiological/emotional reactions and the level of aesthetic appreciation of around 500 experimental subjects, during the observation of 18 different paintings from the XVI-XVIII century, in a real museum context. Methods: Several bio-signals have been recorded to evaluate the participants’ reactions during the observation of paintings. Among them: (a) neurovegetative, motor and emotional biosignals were recorded using wearable tools for EEG (electroencephalogram), ECG (electrocardiogram) and EDA (electrodermal activity); (b) gaze pattern during the observation of art works, while (c) data of the participants (age, gender, education, familiarity with art, etc.) and their explicit judgments about paintings have been obtained.
  • The Neocortex of Cetartiodactyls. II. Neuronal Morphology of the Visual and Motor Cortices in the Giraffe (Giraffa Camelopardalis)

    The Neocortex of Cetartiodactyls. II. Neuronal Morphology of the Visual and Motor Cortices in the Giraffe (Giraffa Camelopardalis)

    Brain Struct Funct (2015) 220:2851–2872 DOI 10.1007/s00429-014-0830-9 ORIGINAL ARTICLE The neocortex of cetartiodactyls. II. Neuronal morphology of the visual and motor cortices in the giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis) Bob Jacobs • Tessa Harland • Deborah Kennedy • Matthew Schall • Bridget Wicinski • Camilla Butti • Patrick R. Hof • Chet C. Sherwood • Paul R. Manger Received: 11 May 2014 / Accepted: 21 June 2014 / Published online: 22 July 2014 Ó Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014 Abstract The present quantitative study extends our of aspiny neurons in giraffes appeared to be similar to investigation of cetartiodactyls by exploring the neuronal that of other eutherian mammals. For cross-species morphology in the giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis) neo- comparison of neuron morphology, giraffe pyramidal cortex. Here, we investigate giraffe primary visual and neurons were compared to those quantified with the same motor cortices from perfusion-fixed brains of three su- methodology in African elephants and some cetaceans badults stained with a modified rapid Golgi technique. (e.g., bottlenose dolphin, minke whale, humpback whale). Neurons (n = 244) were quantified on a computer-assis- Across species, the giraffe (and cetaceans) exhibited less ted microscopy system. Qualitatively, the giraffe neo- widely bifurcating apical dendrites compared to ele- cortex contained an array of complex spiny neurons that phants. Quantitative dendritic measures revealed that the included both ‘‘typical’’ pyramidal neuron morphology elephant and humpback whale had more extensive den- and ‘‘atypical’’ spiny neurons in terms of morphology drites than giraffes, whereas the minke whale and bot- and/or orientation. In general, the neocortex exhibited a tlenose dolphin had less extensive dendritic arbors.
  • 1 Neuroaesthetics

    1 Neuroaesthetics

    Art and brain coevolution Camilo J. Cela-Conde1 [email protected] Francisco J. Ayala CLASSY (Center for the Scientific Study of Creativity: Literature, Arts and Science), School of Biological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, United States 1Corresponding author: Abstract The competence for appreciating beauty appears to be a human universal trait. This fact points out to a phylogenetically derived capacity that, somehow, evolved by means of natural selection. To detail how this evolutionary process took place is difficult to determine, because appreciating beauty is an elusive capacity, impossible to be detected in the fossil record. However, efforts have been made to understand the main characteristics of such competence, particularly by means of the advances of neuroaesthetics. Here, we examine some of the results obtained in experimental research to identify neural correlations of the appreciation of beauty, as well as archaeological and paleoanthropological proofs of the relationship existing between production of artistic objects and evolution of the human brain. Keywords: Coevolution; Neuroaesthetics; Beauty; Artistic objects; Human brain; Neural correlates The capacity for appreciating aesthetic qualities in objects, movements, and sounds seems to be a human universal; all human groups have such competence. The capacity for producing aesthetic items is also universal: painters, dancers, and musicians are not restricted to any culture or historical epoch. However, appreciating aesthetic attributes—what we may call “beauty”—goes beyond producing them in at least two aspects. First, “artists” (producers) make up a small fraction of human groups; on the contrary, “spectators” are numerous. Second, it is possible to appreciate aesthetic qualities in natural objects and events, such as sunsets on a beach, whales’ songs, or flights of birds.
  • Motor Systems Basal Ganglia

    Motor Systems Basal Ganglia

    Motor systems 409 Basal Ganglia You have just read about the different motor-related cortical areas. Premotor areas are involved in planning, while MI is involved in execution. What you don’t know is that the cortical areas involved in movement control need “help” from other brain circuits in order to smoothly orchestrate motor behaviors. One of these circuits involves a group of structures deep in the brain called the basal ganglia. While their exact motor function is still debated, the basal ganglia clearly regulate movement. Without information from the basal ganglia, the cortex is unable to properly direct motor control, and the deficits seen in Parkinson’s and Huntington’s disease and related movement disorders become apparent. Let’s start with the anatomy of the basal ganglia. The important “players” are identified in the adjacent figure. The caudate and putamen have similar functions, and we will consider them as one in this discussion. Together the caudate and putamen are called the neostriatum or simply striatum. All input to the basal ganglia circuit comes via the striatum. This input comes mainly from motor cortical areas. Notice that the caudate (L. tail) appears twice in many frontal brain sections. This is because the caudate curves around with the lateral ventricle. The head of the caudate is most anterior. It gives rise to a body whose “tail” extends with the ventricle into the temporal lobe (the “ball” at the end of the tail is the amygdala, whose limbic functions you will learn about later). Medial to the putamen is the globus pallidus (GP).
  • A Practical Review of Functional MRI Anatomy of the Language and Motor Systems

    A Practical Review of Functional MRI Anatomy of the Language and Motor Systems

    REVIEW ARTICLE FUNCTIONAL A Practical Review of Functional MRI Anatomy of the Language and Motor Systems X V.B. Hill, X C.Z. Cankurtaran, X B.P. Liu, X T.A. Hijaz, X M. Naidich, X A.J. Nemeth, X J. Gastala, X C. Krumpelman, X E.N. McComb, and X A.W. Korutz ABSTRACT SUMMARY: Functional MR imaging is being performed with increasing frequency in the typical neuroradiology practice; however, many readers of these studies have only a limited knowledge of the functional anatomy of the brain. This text will delineate the locations, anatomic boundaries, and functions of the cortical regions of the brain most commonly encountered in clinical practice—specifically, the regions involved in movement and language. ABBREVIATIONS: FFA ϭ fusiform face area; IPL ϭ inferior parietal lobule; PPC ϭ posterior parietal cortex; SMA ϭ supplementary motor area; VOTC ϭ ventral occipitotemporal cortex his article serves as a review of the functional areas of the brain serving to analyze spatial position and the ventral stream working Tmost commonly mapped during presurgical fMRI studies, to identify what an object is. Influenced by the dorsal and ventral specifically targeting movement and language. We have compiled stream model of vision, Hickok and Poeppel2 hypothesized a sim- what we hope is a useful, easily portable, and concise resource that ilar framework for language. In this model, the ventral stream, or can be accessible to radiologists everywhere. We begin with a re- lexical-semantic system, is involved in sound-to-meaning map- view of the language-processing system. Then we describe the pings associated with language comprehension and semantic ac- gross anatomic boundaries, organization, and function of each cess.
  • PAPER Baby Steps: Investigating the Development of Perceptual–Motor Couplings in Infancy Carina C.J.M

    PAPER Baby Steps: Investigating the Development of Perceptual–Motor Couplings in Infancy Carina C.J.M

    Developmental Science 18:2 (2015), pp 270–280 DOI: 10.1111/desc.12226 PAPER Baby steps: investigating the development of perceptual–motor couplings in infancy Carina C.J.M. de Klerk,1 Mark H. Johnson,1 Cecilia M. Heyes2 and Victoria Southgate1 1. Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck College, University of London, UK 2. All Souls College and Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, UK Abstract There are cells in our motor cortex that fire both when we perform and when we observe similar actions. It has been suggested that these perceptual-motor couplings in the brain develop through associative learning during correlated sensorimotor experience. Although studies with adult participants have provided support for this hypothesis, there is no direct evidence that associative learning also underlies the initial formation of perceptual–motor couplings in the developing brain. With the present study we addressed this question by manipulating infants’ opportunities to associate the visual and motor representation of a novel action, and by investigating how this influenced their sensorimotor cortex activation when they observed this action performed by others. Pre-walking 7–9-month-old infants performed stepping movements on an infant treadmill while they either observed their own real-time leg movements (Contingent group) or the previously recorded leg movements of another infant (Non-contingent control group). Infants in a second control group did not perform any steps and only received visual experience with the stepping actions. Before and after the training period we measured infants’ sensorimotor alpha suppression, as an index of sensorimotor cortex activation, while they watched videos of other infants’ stepping actions.
  • Emergent Modular Neural Control Drives Coordinated Motor Actions

    Emergent Modular Neural Control Drives Coordinated Motor Actions

    HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author Nat Neurosci Manuscript Author . Author manuscript; Manuscript Author available in PMC 2019 November 27. Published in final edited form as: Nat Neurosci. 2019 July ; 22(7): 1122–1131. doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0407-2. Emergent Modular Neural Control Drives Coordinated Motor Actions Stefan M. Lemke1,2,3, Dhakshin S. Ramanathan2,3,4,5,1,2, Ling Guo1,2,3, Seok Joon Won2,3, and Karunesh Ganguly2,3 1Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA 2Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA 3Neurology Service, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA 4Mental Health Service, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA 5Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA Abstract A remarkable feature of motor control is the ability to coordinate movements across distinct body parts into a consistent, skilled action. To reach and grasp an object, “gross” arm and “fine” dexterous movements must be coordinated as a single action, but how the nervous system achieves this coordination is currently unknown. One possibility is that, with training, gross and fine movements are co-optimized to produce a coordinated action; alternatively, gross and fine movements may be modularly refined to function together. To address this question, we recorded neural activity in primary motor cortex (M1) and dorsolateral striatum (DLS) during reach-to- grasp skill learning in rats. During learning, the refinement of fine and gross movements was behaviorally and neurally dissociable. Furthermore, inactivation of M1 and DLS had distinct effects on skilled fine and gross movements.
  • Modulation of Fibers to Motor Cortex During Thalamic DBS in Tourette Patients Correlates with Tic Reduction

    Modulation of Fibers to Motor Cortex During Thalamic DBS in Tourette Patients Correlates with Tic Reduction

    brain sciences Article Modulation of Fibers to Motor Cortex during Thalamic DBS in Tourette Patients Correlates with Tic Reduction Pablo Andrade 1,* , Petra Heiden 1,2, Moritz Hoevels 1, Marc Schlamann 3, Juan C. Baldermann 4,5, Daniel Huys 4 and Veerle Visser-Vandewalle 1 1 Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, 50397 Cologne, Germany; [email protected] (P.H.); [email protected] (M.H.); [email protected] (V.V.-V.) 2 Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, 50397 Cologne, Germany 3 Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Cologne, 50397 Cologne, Germany; [email protected] 4 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Cologne, 50397 Cologne, Germany; [email protected] (J.C.B.); [email protected] (D.H.) 5 Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Cologne, 50397 Cologne, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-221-478-82737; Fax: +49-221-478-82824 Received: 12 April 2020; Accepted: 11 May 2020; Published: 15 May 2020 Abstract: Probabilistic tractography in Tourette syndrome (TS) patients have shown an alteration in the connectivity of the primary motor cortex and supplementary motor area with the striatum and thalamus, suggesting an abnormal connectivity of the cortico-striatum-thalamocortical-pathways in TS. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the centromedian nucleus–nucleus ventrooralis internus (CM-Voi complex) in the thalamus is an effective treatment for refractory TS patients. We investigated the connectivity of activated fibers from CM-Voi to the motor cortex and its correlation between these projections and their clinical outcome.