Inhibition of KRAS-Driven Tumorigenicity by Interruption of an Autocrine Cytokine Circuit
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Published OnlineFirst January 20, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0646 RESEARCH ARTICLE Inhibition of KRAS -Driven Tumorigenicity by Interruption of an Autocrine Cytokine Circuit Zehua Zhu 1 , 4 , Amir R. Aref 2 , Travis J. Cohoon 1 , Thanh U. Barbie 7 , Yu Imamura 1 , Shenghong Yang 1 , 4 , Susan E. Moody1 , Rhine R. Shen 1 , Anna C. Schinzel 1 , Tran C. Thai 1 , 4 , Jacob B. Reibel 1 , Pablo Tamayo 4 , Jason T. Godfrey5 , Zhi Rong Qian 1 , Asher N. Page 2 , 3 , Karolina Maciag 4 , 6 , Edmond M. Chan 1 , 4 , Whitney Silkworth4 , Mary T. Labowsky 1 , Lior Rozhansky 1 , Jill P. Mesirov 4 , William E. Gillanders 7 , Shuji Ogino1 , Nir Hacohen 4 , 6 , Suzanne Gaudet 2 , Michael J. Eck 2 , 3 , Jeffrey A. Engelman 5 , Ryan B. Corcoran5 , Kwok-Kin Wong 1 , William C. Hahn 1 , 4 , and David A. Barbie 1 , 4 CD-13-0646_PAP.inddDownloaded OF1 from cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2014 American Association for Cancer 19/03/14 11:15 AM Research. Published OnlineFirst January 20, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0646 ABSTRACT Although the roles of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and phospho- inositide 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling in KRAS -driven tumorigenesis are well estab- lished, KRAS activates additional pathways required for tumor maintenance, the inhibition of which are likely to be necessary for effective KRAS-directed therapy. Here, we show that the IκB kinase (IKK)– related kinases Tank-binding kinase-1 (TBK1) and IKKε promote KRAS -driven tumorigenesis by regu- lating autocrine CCL5 and interleukin (IL)-6 and identify CYT387 as a potent JAK/TBK1/IKKε inhibitor. CYT387 treatment ablates RAS-associated cytokine signaling and impairs Kras -driven murine lung cancer growth. Combined CYT387 treatment and MAPK pathway inhibition induces regression of aggressive murine lung adenocarcinomas driven by Kras mutation and p53 loss. These observations reveal that TBK1/IKKε promote tumor survival by activating CCL5 and IL-6 and identify concurrent inhibition of TBK1/IKKε, Janus-activated kinase (JAK), and MEK signaling as an effective approach to inhibit the actions of oncogenic KRAS. SIGNIFICANCE: In addition to activating MAPK and PI3K, oncogenic KRAS engages cytokine signaling to promote tumorigenesis. CYT387 , originally described as a selective JAK inhibitor, is also a potent TBK/ IKKε inhibitor that uniquely disrupts a cytokine circuit involving CCL5, IL-6, and STAT3. The effi cacy of CYT387-based treatment in murine Kras -driven lung cancer models uncovers a novel therapeutic approach for these refractory tumors with immediate translational implications. Cancer Discov; 4(4); 1–14. ©2014 AACR. INTRODUCTION associated IL-8, CXCL1, and CXCL2 expression also pro- motes senescence ( 14 ), tumor cell survival, and angiogenesis Oncogenic mutations in KRAS and receptor tyrosine ( 15, 16 ). How oncogenic RAS activates these cytokines and kinases (RTK) drive tumor growth by engaging multiple their role in RAS-dependent cancers remains incompletely downstream mitogenic pathways, including RAF–MAPK and characterized. PI3K–AKT ( 1 ). KRAS also activates RAL–GEF ( 2, 3 ) and Activation of RALA and RALB by RAL–GEF enhances infl ammatory signals such as NF-κB ( 4–6 ). Although concur- cancer cell proliferation and survival ( 17 ). A specifi c RALB– rent MAPK–PI3K pathway inhibition is under clinical evalu- SEC5 complex engages the innate immune signaling kinase ation, multiple approaches are likely necessary to identify Tank-binding kinase-1 (TBK1) to promote cell survival ( 18 ). effective KRAS -targeted therapy. TBK1 is required for transformation by oncogenic KRAS, Oncogenic RAS induces infl ammatory cytokines that acti- sustains KRAS -dependent cancer cell viability, and regulates vate NF-κB and STAT3. For example, KRAS -driven non– basal autophagy ( 18–22 ). The TBK1 homolog inhibitor of small cell lung cancers (NSCLC; ref. 7 ) and pancreatic ductal IκB kinase ε (IKKε; encoded by IKBKE) also promotes NF-κB adenocarcinomas (PDAC; ref. 8) engage cell autonomous activation downstream of KRAS ( 23), substitutes for AKT interleukin (IL)-1 signaling. Similarly, oncogenic RAS- to drive cell transformation (24 ), and is induced by RAS- induced IL-6 promotes both oncogene-induced senescence associated cytokines such as IL-1 and IL-6 ( 25 ). Thus, TBK1/ ( 9 ) and cell transformation ( 10 ), and STAT3 is required IKKε signaling is coopted by oncogenic KRAS and facilitates for Kras -driven PDAC development in mice ( 11–13 ). RAS- tumorigenesis. Following viral infection, TBK1 and IKKε amplify IFN-β production via an autocrine loop ( 26 ). Here, we identify a Authors’ Affi liations: Departments of 1 Medical Oncology and 2 Cancer Biol- similar circuit involving CCL5 and IL-6 required for KRAS - ogy, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; 3 Department of Biological Chemistry driven lung tumorigenesis and potently suppressed by 4 and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston; Broad CYT387, a novel TBK1/IKKε and Janus-activated kinase Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge; 5 MGH Cancer Center, 6Center for Immunology and Infl ammatory Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, (JAK) inhibitor. Charlestown, Massachusetts; and 7 Department of Surgery, Division of Biol- ogy and Biomedical Sciences, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Discovery RESULTS Online (http://cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org/). TBK1-Regulated Cell Survival Involves Autocrine A.R. Aref and T.J. Cohoon contributed equally to this work. CCL5 and IL-6 and STAT3 Signaling Corresponding Authors: David A. Barbie, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue D819, Boston, MA 02215. Phone: 617-632-6049; Fax: Expression of Tbk1 is required for transformation by onco- 617-632-5786; E-mail: [email protected] ; William C. Hahn, William_ genic KRAS ( 18 , 20 , 21 ). Although Tbk1 −/− mouse embryonic [email protected] ; and Kwok K. Wong, [email protected] fi broblasts (MEF) proliferate in standard culture, we noted doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0646 marked impairment of Tbk1 −/− MEF proliferation in a clono- ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research. genic assay compared with wild-type (WT) littermate control APRIL 2014CANCER DISCOVERY | OF2 CD-13-0646_PAP.inddDownloaded OF2 from cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2014 American Association for Cancer 19/03/14 11:15 AM Research. Published OnlineFirst January 20, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0646 RESEARCH ARTICLE Zhu et al. A E –/– F 1,600 Tbk1 MEFs 35 WT MEFs WT 1,400 30 1,200 25 1,000 Tbk1–/– MEFs 800 20 600 15 ** 400 –/– 10 Tbk1 MEFs # Colonies Tbk1–/– 200 5 * CCL5 levels (pg/mL) 0 0 EGFP EGFP CM IL-6 MEFs –/– CCL5 –/– WT CM TBK1-KD CXCL10 TBK1-WT WT MEFs Tbk1 CCL5+IL-6 TBK1 Tbk1 B Conditioned β-Actin CCL5+IL-6+CXCL10 media WT Tbk1–/– G12V + + G KRAS –/– –/– –/– H Tbk1 MEFs Tbk1 MEFs WT MEFs Tbk1 MEFs WT Tbk1–/– Serum: 0 h 0.5 h 1 h 4 h 0 h 0.5 h 1 h 4 h Serum: 0 h 1 h 0 h 1 h pSTAT3 pSTAT3 (Y705) (Y705) STAT3 STAT3 C TBK1 KRAS –/– WT Tbk1 TBK1 CXCL10 CCL5 CXCL10 CCL5 β-Actin β-Actin D 1.2 I WT Tbk1–/– Tbk1–/– + CCL5 EGF 1 Ccl5 (min): 0 5 10 20 30 60 90 120 0 5 10 20 30 60 90 120 0 5 10 20 30 60 90 120 Cxcl10 pSTAT3 0.8 Il6 (Y705) 0.6 STAT3 0.4 TBK1 0.2 β-Actin Relative mRNA expression Relative mRNA 0 WT Tbk1–/– Figure 1. Autocrine CCL5 drives TBK1-dependent clonogenic proliferation. A, crystal violet stain and phase-contrast images (×10) of WT or Tbk1 −/− MEFs cultured in a clonogenic assay for 10 days. B, crystal violet stain of Tbk1−/− MEFs cultured clonogenically in conditioned medium from WT or Tbk1 −/− MEFs. C, cytokine antibody arrays of conditioned medium from WT or Tbk1 −/− MEFs. D, mRNA levels of Ccl5 , Cxcl10 , or Il6 in WT or Tbk1 −/− MEFs. Relative expression normalized to WT MEF mRNA levels, mean and SEM of triplicate samples shown. P < 0.001 for each comparison by t test. E, CCL5 levels by ELISA 72 hours after enhanced GFP (EGFP), TBK1-WT, or TBK1-KD reexpression in Tbk1 −/− MEFs. Mean ± SD of duplicate samples shown. TBK1 and β-actin immunoblot below. F, colony number following media supplementation of Tbk1 −/− MEFs, mean ± SEM of six replicates shown. **, P < 0.001 and *, P < 0.01 for comparison with untreated Tbk1 −/− MEFs by t test. G, immunoblot of Y705 phospho-STAT3 (pSTAT3), STAT3, TBK1, and β-actin levels in WT or Tbk1 −/− MEFs serum-starved overnight and stimulated with 10% serum for the indicated times. H, immunoblot of Y705 pSTAT3, STAT3, TBK1, KRAS, and β-actin levels 48 hours following KRAS G12V expression in serum-starved and stimulated WT or Tbk1 −/− MEFs. I, WT or Tbk1 −/− MEFs ± CCL5 (10 ng/mL) stimulated with EGF (100 ng/mL). Immunoblot shows Y705 pSTAT3, STAT3, TBK1, and β-actin. MEFs ( Fig. 1A ). To assess the role of cell contact versus a MEFs (Fig. 1D ), whereas others such as Cxcl1 were increased secreted factor, we plated Tbk1 −/− MEFs in the clonogenic assay (Supplementary Fig. S1C and S1D). Reintroduction of WT with conditioned medium from WT or Tbk1 −/− MEFs propa- but not kinase-dead (KD) TBK1 restored CCL5 production gated at high density (Fig. 1B ). Conditioned medium from by Tbk1 −/− MEFs, revealing kinase-dependent regulation of WT but not Tbk1 −/− MEFs rescued colony formation, revealing this chemokine ( Fig. 1E ). that Tbk1 regulates secreted factors that promote cell prolif- To examine the contribution of CCL5, CXCL10, and/or eration and may contribute to KRAS -driven tumorigenesis. IL-6 to TBK1-regulated survival, we supplemented media Because TBK1/IKKε regulates cytokine production, we with each factor and measured Tbk1 −/− MEF colony for- assessed conditioned medium from WT or Tbk1 −/− MEFs mation.