Use Meitner Looks Back
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Chapter 1 the Biography of a Trafficking Material
Trafficking Materials and Maria Rentetzi Gendered Experimental Practices Chapter 1 The Biography of a Trafficking Material In 1904, an article titled "Radium and Radioactivity" appeared in Century 1 Magazine, a monthly popular magazine published from 1881 to 1930. The article presents Marie Curie's personal account of the discovery of radium and radioactivity. In the article, Curie discusses in depth her arduous attempts to study the radiation of the compounds of uranium and that of known chemical elements, hoping to discover more which are endowed with atomic radioactivity. She revels that it was the chemists who supplied her with the materials she needed. "As I desired to make a very thorough investigation, I had resource to different chemists, who put at my disposal specimens—in some cases the only ones in existence—containing very rare elements." Her next step was to examine different minerals, especially the oxide of uranium 2 ore (pitchblende). To her great surprise, this specimen was found to be four times more active than oxide of uranium itself. The explanation was more than obvious. "The ore must contain a substance more radioactive than uranium and thorium, and this substance must necessarily be a chemical element as yet unknown."1 Her attempts to isolate the new element would lead Marie and Pierre Curie, who joined her research shortly after, to the discovery of both polonium and radium, to the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1903, and to a second Nobel Prize in 1911, this time in chemistry. This chapter attempts to present a cultural -
Origins and Early Years Peace Through Scientific Co-Operation Became an Abiding Purpose
Topical reports: 30th anniversary year The International Atomic Energy Agency: Origins and early years Peace through scientific co-operation became an abiding purpose by Dr John A. Hall Motivated by the apprehension of scientists and' Auspices of the United States Government 1940-1945.* statesmen, created by determined negotiating groups^ This lengthy title/prp'ved too cumbersome for some of and structured to meet thexchallenges of.the future, the the reviewers. The, account,,— prepared by Professor International Atomic Energy Agency celebrates its 30th Henry DeWolf Smyth, Chairman of the Department of birthday on 29 July 1987. • ~\ "' '.. - -">;; •Physics of Princeton University — presented concisely The concept of an international atomic energy organi- in language understandable to the layman, the scientific zation was proposed over 40 years ago. The aims ofsuch background and the nature of atomic energy, and the an organization were to control the new force of nuclear development of the weapon. This small book enjoyed energy for peaceful purposes, to solve the problem of extensive circulation and has been translated into 40 lan- atomic weapon limitation, to protect the public from the guages.** hazards of radiation, and also to promote a constructive dialogue between the United States and the Soviet Union Postwar roots in this new and dynamic field. Following the war, many scientists and statesmen had After the formulation of the early proposals, 10 years concluded that it was vital to secure international control of discussion and fumbling followed, finally resulting in of nuclear energy. The new United Nations, established negotiations leading to the establishment in 1957 of an in the summer of 1945, appeared to be the logical forum autonomous and independent international organization, for examining the possible ways of achieving this goal. -
The Creation of the International Centre for Theoretical Physics in Trieste
Alexis De Greiff The tale of two peripheries The Tale of Two Peripheries: The Creation of the International Centre for Theoretical Physics in Trieste Publicado con cambios menores en Historical Studies of Physical and Biological Sciences (Special Issue, Alexis De Greiff y David Kaiser, eds.) Vol. 33, Part 1 (2002), pp. 33-60. Alexis De Greiff* Abstract: This paper can be seen in the intersection between history of 20th-century physics, diplomatic history and international relations of science. In this work I analyze the dynamics of the negotiations to create the International Centre for Theoretical Physics, which took place between 1960 and 1963 at the International Atomic Energy Agency. In contrast to previous studies on the creation of international scientific institutions, I pay special attention to the active role played by scientists, politicians and intellectuals from the host-city, Trieste (Italy). Further, I spell out the historical circumstances that allowed this group of local actors to become key figures in the establishment of the Centre. I discuss in detail their interests as well as the political and scientific environment that eventually catalysed the diplomatic efforts of the Trieste elite. The present paper is also concerned with the strategies adopted by the advocates of the idea to confront the hostility of delegations from several industrialized countries, the Soviet Union and India. A frontier is a strip which divides and links, a sour gash like a wound which heals with difficulty, a no-man’s land, a mixed territory, whose inhabitants often feel that they do not belong to any clearly-defined country, or at least they do not belong to any country with that obvious certainty with which one usually identifies with ones native land. -
Kerne, Kooperation Und Konkurrenz. Kernforschung In
Wissenschaft, Macht und Kultur in der modernen Geschichte Herausgegeben von Mitchell G. Ash und Carola Sachse Band 3 Silke Fengler Kerne, Kooperation und Konkurrenz Kernforschung in Österreich im internationalen Kontext (1900–1950) 2014 Böhlau Verlag Wien Köln Weimar The research was funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) : P 19557-G08 Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek: Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Datensind im Internet über http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar. Umschlagabbildung: Zusammentreffen in Hohenholte bei Münster am 18. Mai 1932 anlässlich der 37. Hauptversammlung der deutschen Bunsengesellschaft für angewandte physikalische Chemie in Münster (16. bis 19. Mai 1932). Von links nach rechts: James Chadwick, Georg von Hevesy, Hans Geiger, Lili Geiger, Lise Meitner, Ernest Rutherford, Otto Hahn, Stefan Meyer, Karl Przibram. © Österreichische Zentralbibliothek für Physik, Wien © 2014 by Böhlau Verlag Ges.m.b.H & Co. KG, Wien Köln Weimar Wiesingerstraße 1, A-1010 Wien, www.boehlau-verlag.com Alle Rechte vorbehalten. Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Jede Verwertung außerhalb der engen Grenzen des Urheberrechtsgesetzes ist unzulässig. Lektorat: Ina Heumann Korrektorat: Michael Supanz Umschlaggestaltung: Michael Haderer, Wien Satz: Michael Rauscher, Wien Druck und Bindung: Prime Rate kft., Budapest Gedruckt auf chlor- und säurefrei gebleichtem Papier Printed in Hungary ISBN 978-3-205-79512-4 Inhalt 1. Kernforschung in Österreich im Spannungsfeld von internationaler Kooperation und Konkurrenz ....................... 9 1.1 Internationalisierungsprozesse in der Radioaktivitäts- und Kernforschung : Eine Skizze ...................... 9 1.2 Begriffsklärung und Fragestellungen ................. 10 1.2.2 Ressourcenausstattung und Ressourcenverteilung ......... 12 1.2.3 Zentrum und Peripherie ..................... 14 1.3 Forschungsstand ........................... 16 1.4 Quellenlage ............................. -
Max Planck Institute for the History of Science Werner Heisenberg And
MAX-PLANCK-INSTITUT FÜR WISSENSCHAFTSGESCHICHTE Max Planck Institute for the History of Science PREPRINT 203 (2002) Horst Kant Werner Heisenberg and the German Uranium Project Otto Hahn and the Declarations of Mainau and Göttingen Werner Heisenberg and the German Uranium Project* Horst Kant Werner Heisenberg’s (1901-1976) involvement in the German Uranium Project is the most con- troversial aspect of his life. The controversial discussions on it go from whether Germany at all wanted to built an atomic weapon or only an energy supplying machine (the last only for civil purposes or also for military use for instance in submarines), whether the scientists wanted to support or to thwart such efforts, whether Heisenberg and the others did really understand the mechanisms of an atomic bomb or not, and so on. Examples for both extreme positions in this controversy represent the books by Thomas Powers Heisenberg’s War. The Secret History of the German Bomb,1 who builds up him to a resistance fighter, and by Paul L. Rose Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project – A Study in German Culture,2 who characterizes him as a liar, fool and with respect to the bomb as a poor scientist; both books were published in the 1990s. In the first part of my paper I will sum up the main facts, known on the German Uranium Project, and in the second part I will discuss some aspects of the role of Heisenberg and other German scientists, involved in this project. Although there is already written a lot on the German Uranium Project – and the best overview up to now supplies Mark Walker with his book German National Socialism and the quest for nuclear power, which was published in * Paper presented on a conference in Moscow (November 13/14, 2001) at the Institute for the History of Science and Technology [àÌÒÚËÚÛÚ ËÒÚÓËË ÂÒÚÂÒÚ‚ÓÁ̇ÌËfl Ë ÚÂıÌËÍË ËÏ. -
INFCIRC/95/Add.1
INF International Atomic Energy Agency INFCIRC/95/Add.l 6 February 1970 GENERAL Distr. XV INFORMATION CIRCULAR Original: ENGLISH THE TEXTS OF THE INSTRUMENTS CONNECTED WITH THE AGENCY'S ASSISTANCE TO ROMANIA IN FURTHERING PROJECTS BY THE SUPPLY OF MATERIALS Second and Third Supplementary Agreements As a sequel to the assistance which the Agency has provided to the Government of Romania in furthering projects by the supply of materials [ 1 ] , two additional Supplementary Agreements to the Master Agreement concerning the provision of that assistance [2] have been concluded between the Agency and the Government. These Agreements entered into force on 4 June 1968 and 21 August 1968 respectively, and the texts [3 ] are reproduced herein for the information of all Members. [ 1 ] Pursuant to the agreements reproduced in document INFCIRC/95. [2] INFCIRC/95, part I. [3 ] The footnotes to the texts have been added in the present information circular. 70-482 INFCIRC/95/Add. 1 I. SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT No. 2 TO THE MASTER AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY AND THE GOVERNMENT OF ROMANIA FOR ASSISTANCE BY THE AGENCY IN. FURTHERING PROJECTS BY THE SUPPLY OF MATERIALS WHEREAS the International Atomic Energy Agency (hereinafter the "Agency") and the Government of Romania (hereinafter the "Government") on 22 April 1966 entered into a Master Agreement for Assistance by the Agency in Furthering Projects by the Supply of Materials (hereinafter the "Master Agreement") [2 ]; WHEREAS the Government has proposed a project for research -
CLEO Conference
Executive Ballroom Executive Ballroom Executive Ballroom Executive Ballroom 210A 210B 210C 210D CLEO: QELS-Fundamental Science 08:00–10:00 08:00–10:00 08:00–10:00 08:00–10:00 FM1A • Quantum Engineering FM1B • Relativistic Laser-Plasma FM1C • Hyperbolic and Epsilon- FM1D • PT Symmetry and Presider: Nicholas Peters; Applied Interactions near-zero Materials Related Phenomena Communication Sciences, USA Presider: Sergei Tochitsky; Univ. Presider: Philippe Tassin; Presider: Matthias Heinrich, Univ. of California Los Angeles, USA Chalmers Univ., Sweden of Central Florida, USA FM1A.1 • 08:00 Tutorial FM1B.1 • 08:00 Invited FM1C.1 • 08:00 FM1D.1 • 08:00 Quantum Optomechanics, Markus Aspel- High energy ion acceleration and neutron Wave Propagation in Magnetized Epsilon- Beyond PT-symmetry: SUSY-mediated real meyer1; 1Universitat Wien, Austria. This production using relativistic transparency Near-Zero Metamaterials, Arthur Davoyan1, spectra in complex refractive index land- 1 1 1 tutorial provides an introduction to the cur- in solids, Markus Roth1, Daniel Jung2, Kat- Nader Engheta ; Univ. of Pennsylvania, USA. scapes, Mohammad-Ali Miri , Matthias Hein- 1 1 1 rent state-of-the-art, the challenges and the erina Falk2, Nevzat Guler2, Vincent Bagnoud3, In this work we theoretically study light propa- rich , Demetrios N. Christodoulides ; CREOL prospects of achieving quantum optical con- Stefan Bedacht1, Oliver Deppert1, Matthew gation in magnetized epsilon-near-zero (ENZ) The College of Optics and Photonics, Univ. of trol over nano-, micro- and macro-mechanical J. Devlin2, Andrea Favalli2, Juan Fernandez2, metamaterials. We reveal novel regimes of Central Florida, USA. In the presence of gain devices, i.e. quantum optomechanics. -
Guide to the James Franck Papers 1882-1966
University of Chicago Library Guide to the James Franck Papers 1882-1966 © 2006 University of Chicago Library Table of Contents Acknowledgments 3 Descriptive Summary 3 Information on Use 3 Access 3 Citation 3 Biographical Note 4 Scope Note 15 Related Resources 21 Subject Headings 21 INVENTORY 22 Series I: Correspondence 22 Series II: Manuscripts 51 Subseries 1: Physics - work in Germany and Denmark, 1905-1934 51 Subseries 2: Physics - work in United States, 1935-1958 53 Subseries 3: Biophysics - work on Photosynthesis at Johns Hopkins, 1935-193855 Subseries 4: Biophysics - work on Photosynthesis at the University of Chicago,55 1938-48 Subseries 5: Biophysics - work on Photosynthesis after 1948 55 Subseries 6: General Articles and Talks on Science 71 Subseries 7: Papers by other scientists 72 Subseries 8: Notes, memoranda and fragments 76 Subseries 9: Atomic Scientists' Movement, 1944-1953 76 Subseries 10: Franck Memorial Symposium, May 12-13, 1966 79 Series III: Tape Recordings and Photographs 80 Subseries 1: Tape recordings 80 Subseries 2: Hertha Sponer's photograph album, Göttingen, 1920-1933 80 Series IV: Personal Documents and Memorabilia 90 Subseries 1: Documents 90 Subseries 2: Clippings 93 Subseries 3: Biographies and Obituaries 94 Subseries 4: Memorabilia; Scrolls, Certificates, Medals, Mementos 96 Series V: Robert Platzman's Editorial Papers for the "Selected Works of James98 Franck" Series VI: Addenda 103 Subseries 1: Correspondence between James Franck and his nephew and Dr. Heinz104 Kallman Subseries 2: Oversize 105 Descriptive Summary Identifier ICU.SPCL.FRANCK Title Franck, James. Papers Date 1882-1966 Size 20.5 linear feet (29 boxes) Repository Special Collections Research Center University of Chicago Library 1100 East 57th Street Chicago, Illinois 60637 U.S.A. -
Nuclear Proliferation and Safeguards: Appendix Volume II, Part Two
Nuclear Proliferation and Safeguards: Appendix Volume II, Part Two June 1977 NTIS order #PB-275843 — TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction . 1 II. Production of Nuclear Weapons Materials . 3 111. Plutonium-Producing Reactors . 6 Iv. Recovery of Plutonium from Reactor Fuel . 27 v. Uranium Enrichment by Gas Centrifuges . 43 Annexes A. Plutonium Production Rates . 56 B. Parameters of the BGRR . 60 c. Foreign, Non-Communist Resources of Uranium . 61 D. Separative Work . 63 Selected References . 66 TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 11 - APPENDIXES PART TWO VI. Dedicated Facilities VII. Purchase and Theft VIII. Description of Safeguards Technology and Procedures IX. International Controls Appendix VI. Dedicated Facilities Appendix VI Dedicated Facilities Table of Contents Page VI. A. Dedicated Facilities for the Production of Nuclear Weapons in Small and/or Developing Nations . 1 B. Level II Dedicated Facilities . 71 c. Electromagnetic Separation of Isotopes . 93 D. Uranium Laser Isotope Separation and Nuclear weapons Proliferation (Unclassified Version) . 109 i APPENDIX VI-A by John R. Lamarsh ]~~rr~: portions of this report are based on material prepared earlier for the Congressional Research Ser- vice Of the Library of Congress. VI -1 Preventing the spread of nuclear weapons to other nations has been a-major policy objective of the United States Government since the end of World War II. This objective has found expression in domestic legislation restricting the export of nuclear technology and materials, and, on the international front, in the establishment of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and in the negotiation of the Treaty on Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). With the increasing pace in the construction of nuclear power plants abroad, considerable attention has been given to the problem of assuring that none of the plutonium produced in these plants is diverted for use in weapons. -
On the Shoulders of Giants: a Brief History of Physics in Göttingen
1 6 ON THE SHO UL DERS OF G I A NTS : A B RIEF HISTORY OF P HYSI C S IN G Ö TTIN G EN On the Shoulders of Giants: a brief History of Physics in Göttingen 18th and 19th centuries Georg Ch. Lichtenberg (1742-1799) may be considered the fore- under Emil Wiechert (1861-1928), where seismic methods for father of experimental physics in Göttingen. His lectures were the study of the Earth's interior were developed. An institute accompanied by many experiments with equipment which he for applied mathematics and mechanics under the joint direc- had bought privately. To the general public, he is better known torship of the mathematician Carl Runge (1856-1927) (Runge- for his thoughtful and witty aphorisms. Following Lichtenberg, Kutta method) and the pioneer of aerodynamics, or boundary the next physicist of world renown would be Wilhelm Weber layers, Ludwig Prandtl (1875-1953) complemented the range of (1804-1891), a student, coworker and colleague of the „prince institutions related to physics proper. In 1925, Prandtl became of mathematics“ C. F. Gauss, who not only excelled in electro- the director of a newly established Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institute dynamics but fought for his constitutional rights against the for Fluid Dynamics. king of Hannover (1830). After his re-installment as a profes- A new and well-equipped physics building opened at the end sor in 1849, the two Göttingen physics chairs , W. Weber and B. of 1905. After the turn to the 20th century, Walter Kaufmann Listing, approximately corresponded to chairs of experimen- (1871-1947) did precision measurements on the velocity depen- tal and mathematical physics. -
Father of the Shell Model
CENTENARY Father of the shell model Heidelberg University held a symposium on fundamental physics and the shell model this summer to celebrate the 100th anniversary of the birth of Hans Jensen, the German who created the nuclear shell model with Maria Goeppert-Mayer of Argonne. Hans Jensen (1907–1973) is the only theorist among the three winners from Heidelberg University of the Nobel Prize for Physics. He shared the award with Maria Goeppert-Mayer in 1963 for the development of the nuclear shell model, which they published independently in 1949. The model offered the first coherent expla- nation for the variety of properties and structures of atomic nuclei. In particular, the “magic numbers” of protons and neutrons, which had been determined experimentally from the stability properties and observed abundances of chemical elements, found a natural explanation in terms of the spin-orbit coupling of the nucleons. These numbers play a decisive role in the synthesis of the ele- ments in stars, as well as in the artificial synthesis of the heaviest elements at the borderline of the periodic table of elements. Hans Jensen was born in Hamburg on 25 June 1907. He studied physics, mathematics, chemistry and philosophy in Hamburg and Freiburg, obtaining his PhD in 1932. After a short period in the Hans Jensen in his study at 16 Philosophenweg, Heidelberg German army’s weather service, he became professor of theo- in 1963. (Courtesy Bettmann/UPI/Corbis.) retical physics in Hannover in 1940. Jensen then accepted a new chair for theoretical physics in Heidelberg in 1949 on the initiative Mayer 1949). -
SKC Annual Report 2016
AnnualSKC Report 2013 AnnualAnnual Report 2013Page 1 Swedish Centre for Nuclear Technology March 2017 SKC 17-01 Report 2016 SKC, KTH / AlbaNova, Roslagstullsbacken 21, SE-106 91 STOCKHOLM www.swedishnuclear.se, [email protected] +46 (0)8 739 73 25 Summary and highlights of 2016 2016 has resulted in a clearer situation of the Swedish energy market, and the year was mainly influenced by the energy agreement in Sweden in June. The energy commission work held several hearings in 2015 and concluded with a broad national agreement how the energy production will be handled until 2040, including the need for nuclear power as a key ingredient in the transition to a fossile-free energy system. Several activities were performed within SKC during 2016. The Finnish PhD student network on nuclear technology (YTERA) visited KTH in Spring with about 30 participants. SKC was well represented at CHARM, UTNARM and ARMADA and the interest from students seems to remain and we can always guide the students to the best courses, and future employers through our parties. A first SKC Student Day was performed at Chalmers in collaboration with SNEC (Sustainable Nuclear Energy Centre at Chalmers) where about 20 students participated, and several posters and shorter TED-like presentations were given. Prizes to best poster/talk was given at the evening dinner. The annual SKC symposium was held this year outside Gothenburg, at Hindåsgården, 11-12 October. This event had an increased focus on the students, and the plenary session also included 5 short presentations from their research. We had also an invited speaker from VTT in Finland, Eija-Karita Puska, who presented the activities there, but also the national research programme, SAFIR among other things.