A Small Step to the Center Brings Opportunity for the Left Presidential Elections in Colombia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Small Step to the Center Brings Opportunity for the Left Presidential Elections in Colombia No. 2 November 2018 A Small Step to the Center Brings Opportunity for the Left Presidential Elections in Colombia By: Sandra Rátiva Sandra Rativa Gaona. Sociologist, feminist and 1. Specifics environmentalist. Ced-ins Researcher, member of the Congress for the People of Colombia political and social movement. FRL Coordinator in Colombia In runoff election, Iván Duque of the Cen- from 2011 to 2016. She has researched social and ter Democratic Party, representing the var- environmental conflict, including ecological policy, ious right-wing tendencies of Colombia, climate change, community management of com- will be facing off against Gustavo Petro, mon assets, historic memory, and grassroots political former mayor of Bogotá, representing left- organizations. twitter: @agarimas ist and working-class sectors. In the first round, Duque received 39.14% of votes (7,569,693)1, while Petro obtained 25.08% On June 17, Colombia will elect its president for (4,851,254). 2018-2022. After the first round of the election, two men will face each other in the runoff: Iván Duque, representing the right, and Gustavo Petro, for There were two big surprises on election day: the left. Results from the first round of the election, i) a significant show of support for the former held on May 27, evidence several changes in Colom- mayor of Medellin, mathematician Sergio bia’s political dynamics, while other trends remain the Fajardo, a centrist candidate who received same. These reflections are discussed in this article. 1 According to the Colombian Civil Registration Bureau, 97,663 voting sites were set up in the country’s 32 depart- ments. Of the 36,783,940 registered voters, 19,363,714 came out to vote, making voter turnout 53.38%, with a 46.62% abstention rate. A total of 56,935 votes were left blank (0.28%), and 243,645 were invalid (1.24%). Source: https://presidente2018.registraduria.gov.co/resultados/ html/resultados.html 1 23.73% of the vote (4,589,696 votes in total, to represent them all. On March 11, on the only 261,558 fewer than Petro), and ii) rather date of the parliamentary elections, this limited support for former president Ger- primary election ended with Senator Iván mán Vargas Lleras, who had seemed to have Duque as the winner, garnering 4,032,736 the political machinery on his side, but only votes, also choosing Martha Lucia Ramírez garnered 7.28% of votes (1,407,840). While (former minister of defense under Uribe and many talk about the high levels of polariza- also a minister under Pastrana) as the run- tion in the country, the truth of the matter is ning mate. that the runoff election will be decided by the centrist voters, and, if one of the two can- This coalition is based on defending insti- didates is able to excite the electorate, tradi- tutions, tradition, and social and economic tional non-voters, who total 17,420,226, the and social conservatism, and has waged its equivalent of 46.62% of Colombia’s eligible fight against what amounts to the ghosts of voting population. Castro and Chavez in Colombia. The group has been vocal in its criticism of the Hava- na peace accords, claiming that they have 2. Who’s who? resulted in impunity and that crimes against humanity have gone unpunished. Their Iván Duque. “The one Uribe says.” political movement alleges that instead of punishment, the FARC (Common Alterna- Given their similarities, both in terms of tive Revolutionary Force) have been awarded 3 ideology and proposals, a group of politi- parliamentary representation. cal forces came together to fight on a unit- ed front in this election: the Conservative This coalition played to votes from Liberal Party (one of the two long-standing parties Party’s regional patronage structures (the in Colombia, with a close relationship to Liberal Party is the other long-standing the Catholic Church, and which has been Colombian political party, which represent- represented by 22 presidents), the Central ed political liberalism in the 19th century Democratic Party, and Alejandro Ordoñez, and boasts 14 former presidents), as well as an independent candidate (former solicitor from the Radical Change Party (founded in general who was removed from office for 1998, which includes parts of what used to influence peddling; he is an active member be the Liberal Party and regional political of the SSPX Church).2 Together, they held movements; it has connections to the para- a primary election to decide on a candidate military). These parties themselves ended up 2 Ordoñez is a member of the Sacred Hearts of Jesus and receiving only a small number of votes. The Mary congregation in the La Soledad neighborhood in Bogotá, a church belonging to the Society of Saint Pius X, 3 “Interview with Iván Duque, presidential candidate suppor- which was created by the French Cardinal Marcel Lefebvre ted by Uribe -- Presidential Elections - Colombia 2018 – EL- in 1970, see: https://www.las2orillas.co/alejandro-ordo- TIEMPO.COM,” retrieved on June 4, 2018, http://www. nez-fanatico-religioso/ and http://www.vanguardia.com/ eltiempo.com/elecciones-colombia-2018/presidenciales/ santander/bucaramanga/139354-en-la-intimidad-del-cul- entrevista-de-yamid-amat-con-ivan-duque-candidato-presi- tolefebvrista-de-bucaramanga dencial-del-uribismo-225870. 2 Liberal Party, represented by the La Paz ne- behind this campaign. Fajardo’s candidacy gotiator Humberto de la Calle received only was not the result of an internal decision by 399,180 votes, while the official candidate the political parties involved, but rather an for the Radical Change Party was President agreement between their leaders. The agree- Santo’s former vice president, Germán Var- ment was not an easy one to reach, since Ro- gas Lleras. bledo, López, and Fajardo were all interested in being presidential candidates. Within the Iván Duque is the son of a well-known fam- coalition, the Democratic Pole’s support ily from Antioquia. Attorney. Worked for the became blurred, as best evidenced by the Inter-American Development Bank upon the campaign colors (green). Major differences personal recommendation by Juan Manuel of opinion and debate arose within the party, Santos (2001-2013). Senator for the 2014- as many of its members decided to support 2018 period, representing the Central Dem- Gustavo Petro in the first round of the elec- ocratic Party.4 Duque resigned his senate seat tions, arguing that Coalition Colombia did to run for president. In December 2017, the not represent the Pole’s opposition-based, party ran an internal survey and ended up leftist ideology. giving him their presidential nomination. Iván Duque’s candidacy was openly and Sergio Fajardo is also from Antioquia. strongly supported by Alvaro Uribe Velez. Mathematician and university professor. Medellín Mayor (2004-2007) and Antioquia Governor (2012-2015). He was Antanas Sergio Fajardo (62). “I am a teacher.” Mockus’s running mate in 2010 (vice presi- dential candidate). Coalition Colombia is a political alliance that was created under an agreement be- “My name is Gustavo Petro and I tween three parties: the Green Alliance want to be your president.” Party, the Alternative Democratic Pole, and the Citizen Commitment Civil Movement. As Coalition Colombia was coming together This alliance focused its efforts on fighting in December 2017, Gustavo Petro insisted corruption and a new code of ethics for pol- that the various centrist and leftist politi- itics. Green Alliance Senator Claudia López, cal forces should come together to choose Democratic Pole Senator Jorge Robledo (the a single presidential candidate for 2018 to longtime political adversary of Alvaro Uribe participate in the elections with a united Vélez), Senator-elect (2018-2022) and former front. However, disagreements within the Bogotá Mayor Antanas Mockus, and other Democratic Pole5, especially within the sec- famous Colombian intellectuals were tor represented by Senator Jorge Robledo, as 4 He won his senate seat by being on the list headed by for- a result of the heady presidential campaign mer President Álvaro Uribe Vélez. Therefore, in the strictest sense of the word, Duque did not win his seat outright, but launched by former senator Piedad Córdoba rather thanks to his party, which is the same as saying thanks 5 https://www.las2orillas.co/por-que-jorge-enrique-roble- to Uribe himself. do-nunca-votaria-por-gustavo-petro/; 3 (who ran under the Citizen Power Party, but recipient of the 2018 Goldman environmen- dropped out in April), and also because of tal award)6. the Green Alliance Party’s placing its hopes on its most visible face, Claudia López, and Undoubtedly, one Gustavo Petro’s most also due to Fajardo’s own belligerence, the strategic moves was naming Senator Angela multi-party primary only included Gustavo Maria Robledo as his running mate. Roble- Petro for Human Colombia and former San- do is a university professor, self-proclaimed ta Marta Mayor Carlos Caicedo. This pri- feminist, and one of the nation’s most char- mary was also held on March 11, and Gus- ismatic figures, especially adept at reaching tavo Petro was the clear winner. That day, agreements and consensus across the dem- Petro was also endorsed by six newly-elected ocratic spectrum. Her participation in the parliamentary representatives from the “list campaign brought a feminist perspective to of decency” group, which during those elec- the debates on women’s rights, caretaking tions included the Patriotic Union (a leftist professions, and the political participation of party that had suffered political genocide all types of sectors of the economy. back in the 80’s), the Alternative Indigenous and Social Movement (MAIS - a party that Gustavo Petro (58) was born in Sucre, in the included the highly politicized and autono- Colombian Caribbean Region, but he grew mous sectors of various indigenous commu- up and studied in the center of the country.
Recommended publications
  • What Can the State Do? Creating Social Capital in Civil Society
    Lund University STVA21 Department of Political Science Tutor: Simon Davidsson What can the state do? Creating social capital in civil society Fredrik Banke Hjalmar Haglund Abstract The purpose of this thesis is to give suggestions on how states can generate social capital in civil society. This is done by comparing the established literature on the topic with the unconventional approach implemented by Antanas Mockus, former mayor of Bogotá. Three influential political scientists are here selected to portray central aspects of the established literature. Their writings are compared with the approach underlying Antanas Mockus work and his attempts on creating social capital in civil society. We find that Mockus’ approach in many aspects is similar to the established literature but also that certain dimensions are yet to be explored. Mockus provides us with an alternative method to change civic expectations and perceptions in order to reach social change. Further, unexplored pedagogical and educational interventions combining art and theatre with social change and the creation of social trust is something we find when reviewing the case of Mockus. We acknowledge that further research can be conducted on this topic, especially when it comes to the role of leadership and its impact on the creation of social capital. Key words: social capital, social trust, civic culture, governance, Antanas Mockus Words: 9756 Acknowledgments The idea for this paper was first conceived when one of the authors was doing an internship in the NGO Corpovisionarios, created and led by Antanas Mockus. Six months were spent fully engulfed in the concept and approach that is Cultura Ciudadana (Civic Culture).
    [Show full text]
  • Crónica De La Estrategia Virtual De Antanas Mockus
    Crónica de la estrategia virtual de Antanas Mockus TRABAJO DE GRADO PARA EL PROGRAMA DE PERIODISMO Y OPINIÓN PÚBLICA Presentado por: Daniel Romero González [email protected] DIRECTOR DE TRABAJO DE GRADO: Leandro Peñaranda Docente UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO Escuela de Ciencias Humanas Periodismo y Opinión Pública Bogotá D.C. Mayo de 2011 2 CONTENIDO -Introducción…………………………………………………4 1. Visionarios y el llanero solitario…………………………..7 2. Huele a campaña……………………………………….....10 3. Nace una fuerza política...…………….……….................14 4. Unidos podemos más……….………….………………....20 5. “Vote por uno de nosotros”………………………………24 6. La campaña hecha por la gente…………………………...31 7. “Yo iba a votar por Mockus, pero ya no”………………...47 8. De la Ola Verde a la Naranja Mecánica…………….........56 -Análisis.…………………………………………………….63 -Referencias……………………………………………........65 -Anexo # 1…………………………………………………...68 -Anexo # 2…………………………………………………...70 3 Introducción En el año 2008, el entonces candidato Barack Obama sentó un precedente en Norteamérica: vía redes sociales pueden conquistarse varios miles de electores. Con el extraordinario apoyo de Internet, Obama fue elegido presidente. Y no cualquiera: fue el primer afroamericano en ocupar la Casa Blanca; fue el primer mandatario 2.01 del mundo, respaldado por más de 60 millones de individuos en las urnas. Como Obama en los Estados Unidos, en el año 2010 el ex alcalde de Bogotá Antanas Mockus lideró un fenómeno nunca antes visto en el país. Por más de 30 meses hizo una campaña donde redes sociales como Facebook y Twitter fueron su motor en la lucha por la presidencia de Colombia, produciendo un movimiento ciudadano de casi 4 millones de personas que “pusieron a temblar al establecimiento”2 y obligaron a “la clase política clientelista a tener que unirse para sobrevivir”3.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper Series Paper No
    DANTE B. FASCELL NORTH-SOUTH CENTER WORKING PAPER NUMBER FOURTEEN 1 The Dante B. Fascell North-South Center Working Paper Series Paper No. 14 March 2003 Was Failure Avoidable? Learning From Colombia’s 1998-2002 Peace Process Adam Isacson http://www.miami.edu/nsc/publications/NSCPublicationsIndex.html#WP The Dante B. Fascell North South Center UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI DANTE B. FASCELL NORTH-SOUTH CENTER WORKING PAPER NUMBER FOURTEEN 2 The following is a Working Paper of The Dante B. Fascell North-South Center at the University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida. As this paper is a work-in-progress, the author(s) and the North-South Center wel- come comments and critiques from colleagues and students of security studies, environmental issues, and civil society participation. Comments may be e-mailed to the series editor, Jeffrey Stark, at [email protected]. © 2003 All North-South Center Working Papers are protected by copyright. Published by the University of Miami North-South Center. All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Conventions. The views expressed in this paper are those of the author(s), not The Dante B. Fascell North-South Center, which is a nonpartisan public policy and research institution. Inquiries and submissions to the North-South Center Working Papers Series may be sent to Jeffrey Stark, Director of Research and Studies, via e-mail attachment to [email protected], including author’s name, title, affiliation, and e-mail address. ISBN 1-57454-138-2 March 2003 DANTE B. FASCELL NORTH-SOUTH CENTER WORKING PAPER NUMBER FOURTEEN 3 WAS FAILURE AVOIDABLE? LEARNING FROM COLOMBIA’S 1998-2002 PEACE PROCESS Adam Isacson A Bitter End olombians had never seen President Andrés Pastrana as angry or as dejected as he appeared on television C the night of Wednesday, February 20, 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Antanas Mockus Y Gustavo Petro: La Dimensión De Lo Actitudinal En Dos Trayectorias Políticas
    ANTANAS MOCKUS Y GUSTAVO PETRO: LA DIMENSIÓN DE LO ACTITUDINAL EN DOS TRAYECTORIAS POLÍTICAS Rafael Silva Vega Número 1 | Enero 2014 ISSN-e 2357-3945 SERIE DOCUMENTOS DE TRABAJO DEL CIES ISSN-e 2357-3945 Número 1 | Enero 2014 Rector: Francisco Piedrahita Plata Secretaria general: María Cristina Navia Klemperer Director académico: José Hernando Bahamón Lozano Decano de la Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias sociales: Adolfo Jerónimo Botero Marino Director del Centro de Investigaciones CIES: Vladimir Rouvinski Universidad Icesi Centro de Estudios Interdisciplinarios Jurídicos, Sociales y Humanistas (CIES) Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales Calle 18 No. 122-135 Pance, Cali - Colombia Teléfono: +57 (2) 555 2334 - Ext. 8846 Fax: +57 (2) 555 1441 [email protected] www.icesi.edu.co/cies Comité Editorial Hoover Alfonso Delgado Madronero Jorge Ordóñez Valverde Mario Alberto Cajas Sarria Yecid Echeverry Enciso Enrique Rodríguez Caporalli Adrián Alzate García Diego Alejandro Nieto Sachica Diana Margarita Díaz Mejia Margarita Leonor Cuéllar Barona Vladimir Rouvinski Adolfo Jerónimo Botero Marino Edición Centro de Investigaciones CIES Coordinación editorial Adolfo A. Abadía | [email protected] Diseño editorial y Diseño Portada Johanna Trochez LaDeLasVioletas | [email protected] El Centro de Estudios Interdisciplinarios Jurídicos, Sociales y Humanistas (CIES) no se hace responsable de las ideas expuestas bajo su nombre, las ideas publicadas, los modelos teóricos expuestos o los nombres aludidos por el(los) autor(es) de los artículos. El contenido es responsabilidad exclusiva del(los) autor(es), y no reflejan la opinión de las directivas de la Universidad Icesi, del Centro de Investigaciones CIES, de la Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales, o de los editores de la SERIE DOCUMENTOS DE TRABAJO DEL CIES.
    [Show full text]
  • Violence, the Post-Conflict and Electoral Trends in Colombia
    Violence, the post-confict and electoral trends in Colombia: notes for refection Violencia, posconficto armado y comportamiento electoral en Colombia: notas para la refexión Jerónimo Ríos Universidad Complutense de Madrid [email protected] Jennifer Morales Correa Universidad EAN [email protected] Abstract This descriptive exercise presented in this paper suggests a certain spatial relationship between regions in Colombia that for years had the highest levels of territorial vulnerability, in terms of exposure to the internal armed confict and structural violence, and the predominant views expressed both during the FARC-EP plebiscite and the second- round presidential elections that took place in 2018. In a similar vein to the feld of study of electoral geography, the refections posited here suggest inquiring about a possible voting for peace trend in Colombia, which is particularly perceptible in the country’s territorial periphery, where support for Gustavo Petro and backing for the Peace Agreement signed with the FARC-EP guerrillas have found more supporters. Key Words: Colombian armed confict, Peace Agreement, FARC-EP, electoral geography. Resumen El trabajo que se presenta a continuación, en un ejercicio descriptivo, sugiere una cierta relación espacial entre los lugares de Colombia que durante años presentaron mayores niveles de vulnerabilidad territorial, en términos derivados del conficto armado interno y violencia estructural, con respecto a la posición predominante tanto a tenor del plebiscito con las FARC-EP, como con las elecciones presidenciales de la segunda vuelta, acontecidas en 2018. Con una alta proximidad al campo de estudio que representa la geografía electoral, se proponen refexiones que sugerirían indagar en un posible voting for peace en Colombia, especialmente perceptible en la periferia territorial del país, en donde el apoyo a Gustavo Petro y el respaldo al Acuerdo de Paz suscrito con la guerrilla de las FARC-EP encuentra mayores adeptos.
    [Show full text]
  • Memory in Search of History and Democracy Editor’S Letter by June Carolyn Erlick
    fall 2013 harvard review of latin america memory in search of history and democracy editor’s letter by june carolyn erlick The Past Is Present Irma Flaquer’s image as a 22-year-old Guatemalan reporter stares from the pages of a 1960 harvard review of latin america Time magazine, her eyes blackened by a government mob that didn’t like her feisty stance. fall 2013 She never gave up, fighting with her pen against the long dictatorship, suffering a car bomb Volume Xiii no. 1 explosion in 1970, then being dragged by her hair from her car one October ten years later and disappearing. Published by the david Rockefeller Center I knew she was courageous. I became intrigued by her relentless determination—why did for Latin American Studies she keep on writing? However, the case was already old even in 1996, when the Inter Ameri- Harvard university volume Xiii no. 1 can Press Association (IAPA) assigned me the investigation for its new Impunity Project. Irma David Rockefeller Center was one of Guatemala’s 45,000 disappeared—one of thousands in Latin America, men and for Latin American Studies women forcibly vanished, mostly killed. Yet I learned from the investigation that disappear- director ance is a crime against humanity, a crime not subject to a statute of limitations. Merilee S. Grindle memory And I also learned from Irma’s courageous sister Anabella that it really is a crime that executive director in eVery issue never ends. “They took my moral support, my counselor; in killing my sister, they stole my Kathy Eckroad human right,” Anabella told IAPA members at a Los Angeles meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Segunda Encuesta Elecciones Presidenciales 2010
    SEGUNDA ENCUESTA ELECCIONES PRESIDENCIALES 2010 VICERRECTORÍA DE EXTENSIÓN UNIVERSIDAD DE MEDELLÍN MEDELLÍN, MAYO DE 2010 SEGUNDA ENCUESTA ELECCIONES PRESIDENCIALES 2010 INTRODUCCIÓN El presente informe es el análisis estadístico del trabajo realizado para identificar Intención de voto por los candidatos a la Presidencia de la República. En total se encuestaron 2417 personas en todo el territorio nacional, de los cuales solo 1866 manifiestan que si tienen la cedula inscrita para las próximas elecciones y tienen intención de votar el 30 de Mayo, base con la cual se presentarán los resultados de la intención de voto. En su elaboración se utilizaron herramientas estadísticas apropiadas para alcanzar un resultado confiable. 2 ENCUESTA ELECCIONES PRESIDENCIALES 2010 ENCUESTA ELECCIONES PRESIDENCIALES 2010 Distribución por Región Frecuencia Porcentaje Amazonia 196 8,1% Andina 877 36,3% Caribe 543 22,5% Distribución por Insular 144 6,0% Región Orinoquia 209 8,6% Pacifica 448 18,5% Total 2417 100,0% El 36,3% de las encuestas se realizaron en la región Andina, el 22,5% en la región Caribe, el 18,5% en el Pacifico, 8,6% en la Orinoquia, el 8,1% en la Amazonia y el 6,0% en la región Insular. Distribución por Region 36,3% 40,0% 30,0% 22,5% 18,5% 20,0% 8,1% 8,6% 6,0% 10,0% ,0% Amazonia Andina Caribe Insular Orinoquia Pacifica 3 ENCUESTA ELECCIONES PRESIDENCIALES 2010 Distribución por Estrato Frecuencia Porcentaje 1 386 16,0% 2 830 34,3% 3 723 29,9% 4 189 7,8% Estrato 5 76 3,1% 6 48 2,0% En blanco 165 6,8% Total 2417 100,0% El 34,3% de las encuestas se realizaron en el estrato 2, el 29,9% en el estrato 3, el 16,0% en el estrato 1, el 7,8% en el 4, el 3,1% en 5, el 2,0% en estrato 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Elections in Colombia: Return of Uribism and Uncertainty of the Peace Process Written by Edgar Andrés Londoño Niño
    Elections in Colombia: Return of Uribism and Uncertainty of the Peace Process Written by Edgar Andrés Londoño Niño This PDF is auto-generated for reference only. As such, it may contain some conversion errors and/or missing information. For all formal use please refer to the official version on the website, as linked below. Elections in Colombia: Return of Uribism and Uncertainty of the Peace Process https://www.e-ir.info/2018/06/28/elections-in-colombia-return-of-uribism-and-uncertainty-of-the-peace-process/ EDGAR ANDRéS LONDOñO NIñO, JUN 28 2018 The 2018 Presidential elections in Colombia show several particularities in comparison with past elections. For the first time, a dispute between economic and political models was not as strong as usual because, for the first time in Colombia’s history, a leftist candidate went to the second round and became a feasible alternative. In addition, for the first time in 50 years the presidential poll was free of the threat of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC in Spanish), so the candidates’ proposals went beyond the fight against terrorism. Colombia, where the vote is not compulsory, has one of the highest abstention levels of the world, traditionally above 50% in the last 20 years, the two exceptions were the elections of 1998 and 2018, when more than half of the electoral registration participated. In the 2014 elections, the abstention levels were 59.35% and 52.03% in the first and in the second round, respectively. In the 2018 elections, abstention levels decreased to 46.62% in the first round and 46.96% in the second round.
    [Show full text]
  • WOLA Colombia Monitor
    WOLA Colombia Monitor JULY 2002 A WOLA BRIEFING SERIES Produced by the Washington Office on Colombia Cracks Down Latin America, the Colombia Monitor n May 26, Alvaro Uribe Vélez earned the Colombian presidency in a re- combines timely analysis sounding first-round victory. This edition of the Colombia Monitor provides of policy dynamics in Obackground on the history of Colombian elections, a review of this year’s Washington with on-the- March congressional and May presidential elections, and an assessment of the chal- ground monitoring of lenges awaiting, and concerns about, the Uribe administration, which assumes office on the impact of U.S. policy August 7. It also outlines the unfolding debate about Colombia in Washington, particu- in the Andean region. The larly around the emergency supplemental appropriations bill that will, among other intent of this briefing things, alter the U.S. mission in Colombia to include involvement in series is to broaden and counterinsurgency operations. inform the public and policy debates about how to strengthen Democracy and Elections in Colombian History democracy, human rights, The Conservative and Liberal parties are pillars of Colombian political history. Their and prospects for peace. nineteenth-century origins are some of the oldest in Latin America and one scholar has called them the “functional equivalent of subcultures.”1 Until the late 1950s, the parties did This issue provides an more than represent social cleavages in Colombia: they were the social cleavage. Indeed, the analysis of the Colombian infamous la violencia (“the violence”), a civil war lasting from the 1940s until the 1960s, presidential election and largely stemmed from land disputes and the “hereditary hatreds” of familial party loyalties.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceso Electoral Colombiano De 2010: Entre El Ajuste Y La Consolidación Del Uribismo Julián Darío Bonilla Montenegro* Carolina Velandia Hernández**
    Comentario Internacional Coyuntura REVISTA DEL CENTRO ANDINO DE ESTUDIOS INTERNACIONALES 10, II semestre 2010 • Quito ISSN 1390-1532 Proceso electoral colombiano de 2010: entre el ajuste y la consolidación del uribismo Julián Darío Bonilla Montenegro* Carolina Velandia Hernández** Introducción os escenarios de la práctica y la participación política en Colombia, durante el proceso electoral para las elecciones de Congreso y Pre- sidente permiten establecer nuevos parámetros de identidad política, Lnuevas estrategias discursivas apoyadas en la figura del presidente Álvaro Uribe Vélez, ajustes al interior de los partidos y una nueva relación entre el candidato y el elector. Estas condiciones de coyuntura electoral colom- biana, lejos de fomentar cambios, alimentan las lecturas tradicionales de la democracia en este país. Por ejemplo, apoya calificativos históricos como: “Colombia es la segunda democracia más antiguas de América”, o “Colom- bia no sufrió de dictaduras extensas como en el Cono Sur”. En consecuen- cia, se debe entender perpetuada la estabilidad institucional, o renovados los procesos electorales legítimos. Asimismo, también se puede confirmar como, gracias a la legitimación del proceso electoral, las élites colombianas han logrado perpetuarse en el poder, renovando los rostros de los líderes pero de fondo siendo los mismos grupos de elite. Este ensayo analítico tiene como fin realizar un análisis de coyuntura de las elecciones de 2010 y explicar las razones que llevaron al acenso a Juan Manuel Santos, que permita al lector una lectura del ajuste político sufrido * Abogado Universidad Nacional de Colombia, magíster en análisis de problemas políticos, econó- micos e internacionales contemporáneos del Instituto de Altos Estudios para el Desarrollo-Acade- mia diplomática de San Carlos; ‹[email protected]›.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Legislative and Presidential Elections Colombia Internacional, Núm
    Colombia Internacional ISSN: 0121-5612 [email protected] Universidad de Los Andes Colombia Pachón, Mónica; Hoskin, Gary Colombia 2010: An Analysis of the Legislative and Presidential Elections Colombia Internacional, núm. 74, julio-diciembre, 2011, pp. 9-26 Universidad de Los Andes Bogotá, D.C., Colombia Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=81222598002 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative ColombiaInternacional 74, julio a diciembre de 2011: 9-26 Colombia 2010: análisis de las elecciones presidenciales y legislativas Mónica Pachón Universidad de los Andes Gary Hoskin Universidad de los Andes Resumen Los resultados de las elecciones de Congreso y presidente del 2010 en Colombia muestran la consolidación del multipartidismo en el cual las coaliciones postelectorales se han convertido en una constante desde el colapso del sistema bipartidista a finales de los años noventa. El propósito del artículo es discutir los resultados electorales, con especial atención a la forma en que la propuesta del referendo para reelegir a Álvaro Uribe Vélez impactó la dinámica electoral. Primero, analiza el contexto de las elecciones, posteriormente los resultados electorales y finalmente cómo este nuevo panorama consolida un sistema multipartidista en el nivel nacional después de la reforma del 2003. Palabras clave elecciones • sistema de partidos • Álvaro Uribe Vélez • Juan Manuel Santos • Antanas Mockus • Colombia Colombia 2010: An Analysis of the Legislative and Presidential Elections Abstract The 2010 Colombian elections clearly moved the country toward a more multiparty system, characterized by the practice of post-electoral coalitions.
    [Show full text]
  • 5º Panel De Opinión De 2013. Fuente
    ISSN 2248-8359 CRA 3 # 62-21 @CIFRASYCONCEPTO BOGOTÁ -COLOMBIA PBX 6952576 FAX 2482582 WWW.CIFRASYCONCEPTOS.COM CIFRASYCONCEPTOS PANEL DE Si desea consultar los resultados completos del Panel de Opinión 2013 Visite: www.cifrasyconceptos.com medición julio 8 – septiembre 20 de 2013 5º PANEL DE OPINIÓN 2013 ÍNDICE César A. Caballero R. Gerente. EL PANEL DE OPINIÓN 4 Paola Andrea Medina 1 Coordinadora Panel de Opinión. David Rodríguez Director área de Productos. Diana Galvis, Geraldine Parra, Ingrid Rojas, Sandra Martínez, RESULTADOS NACIONALES 7 Adriana Gómez y Mayra Nieto. 2 Equipo Bogotá. Gustavo Romero Muestreo. Comité editorial: LA OPINIÓN DE LOS 21 Eduardo Jiménez, Juan Fernando Lucio, Víctor Muñoz, Guillermo Rudas, Jaime Tenjo y Fernando Zarama. 3 LÍDERES REGIONALES Agradecimientos especiales a: El equipo directivo de Cifras & Conceptos, a nuestros 17 encuesta- dores y a los 2.155 líderes que contestaron la quinta versión del Panel de Opinión. Diseño y diagramación: Rizoma & Diego García ISSN: 2248-8359 Panel de Opinión es una marca registrada de Cifras & Conceptos S.A. Resolución 45888 del 30 de agosto de 2010 Superintenedencia de Industria y Comercio EL PANEL DE OPINIÓN 1 EL PERFIL DE LOS LÍDERES El Panel de Opinión busca representar un universo de 5.900 Estudio elaborado por Cifras & Conceptos S.A. que busca conocer líderes agrupados en cinco redes: las percepciones de los líderes de opinión del país sobre temas políticos, económicos, sociales y ambientales a nivel nacional y MEDIOS DE COMUNICACIÓN: directores de los principales medios, departamental. Se realiza anualmente y busca construir una serie jefes de redacción, editores, columnistas, directores de noticias, histórica.
    [Show full text]