DOCSLIB.ORG

Protocol for Enhanced in Situ Bioremediation Using Emulsified Edible Oil

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Protocol for Enhanced in Situ Bioremediation Using Emulsified Edible Oil Protocol for Enhanced In Situ Bioremediation Using Emulsified Edible Oil Prepared by: May 2006 Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release This report was prepared for the Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP) by Solutions-IES, Inc. (Solutions-IES) and representatives from ESTCP. In no event shall either the United States Government or Solutions-IES have any responsibility or liability for any consequences of any use, misuse, inability to use, or reliance upon the information contained herein, nor does either warrant or otherwise represent in any way the accuracy, adequacy, efficacy, or applicability of the contents hereof. This protocol focuses on the application of edible oil emulsions to provide a long-lived carbon source to enhance anaerobic bioremediation of contaminants in groundwater. The use of emulsified oils for groundwater remediation is patented by US Patent No. 6,398,9060. International patents are pending. To discuss applications of this technology please contact: ¾ Dr. Bob Borden of Solutions-IES at 919-873-1060 or [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 USING THE EMULSIFIED OIL PROCESS .......................................................1 1.1 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 INTENDED USE OF THIS DOCUMENT............................................................................... 2 1.3 OVERVIEW OF ENHANCED ANAEROBIC BIOREMEDIATION..................................... 2 1.3.1 APPLICABLE CONTAMINANTS ................................................................................... 3 1.3.2 SUITABLE SITE CONDITIONS ...................................................................................... 4 1.3.3 MICROBIOLOGY ............................................................................................................. 4 1.3.4 SUBSTRATES ................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 THE EMULSIFIED OILS PROCESS ...................................................................................... 5 1.4.1 APPLICATION METHODS.............................................................................................. 5 1.4.2 TREATMENT SYSTEM CONFIGURATIONS................................................................ 6 1.5 PROCEEDING WITH THE EMULSIFIED OIL PROCESS................................................... 8 SECTION 2 IMPACT OF EMULSIFIED OILS ON CONTAMINANT TRANSPORT AND FATE ...................................................................................................................................10 2.1 ENHANCED ANAEROBIC BIOREMEDIATION USING EDIBLE OILS......................... 10 2.1.1 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL COMPOSITION OF EDIBLE OILS ............................ 11 2.1.2 ANAEROBIC FERMENTATION OF EDIBLE OIL ...................................................... 15 2.1.3 ENHANCED ANAEROBIC BIOREMEDIATION......................................................... 17 2.1.3.1 Reductive Dechlorination of Chlorinated Ethenes............................................... 17 2.1.3.2 Anaerobic Biodegradation of Perchlorate............................................................ 19 2.1.3.3 Anaerobic Biodegradation of Explosives ............................................................ 22 2.1.3.4 Microbiology of Other Contaminants.................................................................. 23 2.2 IMPACT OF RESIDUAL EDIBLE OIL ON CONTAMINANT SORPTION ...................... 23 2.3 SUMMARY OF KEY POINTS .............................................................................................. 25 SECTION 3 INJECTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF EMULSIFIED OILS........................26 3.1 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF EDIBLE OILS AND EDIBLE OIL EMULSIONS .......................................................................................................................... 26 3.1.1 PROPERTIES OF PURE OILS........................................................................................ 26 3.1.1.1 Water Solubility and Interfacial Tension............................................................. 26 3.1.1.2 Density................................................................................................................. 27 3.1.1.3 Viscosity .............................................................................................................. 28 3.1.2 PROPERTIES OF OIL-IN-WATER EMULSIONS ........................................................ 28 3.1.2.1 Emulsion Preparation........................................................................................... 28 3.1.2.2 Emulsion Solubility and Interfacial Tension ....................................................... 32 i TABLE OF CONTENTS 3.1.2.3 Density................................................................................................................. 32 3.1.2.4 Viscosity .............................................................................................................. 32 3.1.3 IMPACT OF OIL AND EMULSION PROPERTIES ON MATERIAL HANDLING AND INJECTION ............................................................................................................ 34 3.2 INJECTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF EDIBLE OIL EMULSIONS ................................. 34 3.2.1 PROCEDURES FOR INJECTION OF EDIBLE OIL EMULSIONS.............................. 38 3.2.1.1 Injection System Setup ........................................................................................ 38 3.2.1.2 Emulsion Injection Wells..................................................................................... 41 3.2.1.3 Emulsion and Water Injection ............................................................................. 42 SECTION 4 APPROACHES FOR FULL-SCALE APPLICATION OF EMULSIFIED OILS..............................................................................................................................................43 4.1 INITIAL SITE SCREENING ................................................................................................. 43 4.1.1 CONTAMINANTS .......................................................................................................... 43 4.1.2 RISKS TO CRITICAL RECEPTORS.............................................................................. 44 4.1.3 AQUIFER PERMEABILITY........................................................................................... 44 4.2 REMEDIATION OBJECTIVES............................................................................................. 44 4.3 CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL.............................................................................................. 45 4.3.1 HYDROGEOLOGY......................................................................................................... 45 4.3.1.1 Depth to Groundwater ......................................................................................... 45 4.3.1.2 Hydraulic Conductivity........................................................................................ 46 4.3.1.3 Groundwater Flow ............................................................................................... 46 4.3.2 CONTAMINANT DISTRIBUTION................................................................................ 46 4.3.2.1 Source Area Size.................................................................................................. 46 4.3.2.2 Plume Size ........................................................................................................... 46 4.3.3 GEOCHEMISTRY ........................................................................................................... 47 4.3.3.1 Sulfate/Sulfides.................................................................................................... 47 4.3.3.2 Dissolved Oxygen, Nitrate, Iron, Manganese and Oxidation-Reduction Potential47 4.3.3.3 pH and Alkalinity................................................................................................. 48 4.3.4 MICROBIOLOGY ........................................................................................................... 48 4.3.4.1 Reductive Dechlorination of Chloroethenes........................................................ 48 4.3.4.2 Bioaugmentation.................................................................................................. 49 4.4 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN....................................................................................................... 50 4.4.1 TREATMENT ZONE LAYOUT ..................................................................................... 50 4.4.1.1 Source Area ......................................................................................................... 50 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.4.1.2 Permeable Reactive Barrier ................................................................................. 51 4.4.2 ADDITIONAL PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS......................................................... 51 4.4.2.1 Secondary Water Quality Issues .......................................................................... 52 4.4.2.2 Soil Gas Emissions .............................................................................................. 52 4.5 DETAILED DESIGN OF AN EMULSIFIED OIL PROJECT............................................... 53 4.5.1 AMOUNT OF OIL REQUIRED...................................................................................... 53
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Biochemistry and Physiology of Halorespiration by Desulfitobacterium Dehalogenans
    Biochemistry and Physiology of Halorespiration by Desulfitobacterium dehalogenans ..?.^TJ?*LE_ LANDBOUWCATALOGU S 0000 0807 1728 Promotor: Dr.W.M . deVo s hoogleraar in de microbiologie Co-promotoren: Dr.ir .A.J.M .Stam s universitair hoofddocent bij deleerstoelgroe p Microbiologie Dr.ir . G. Schraa universitair docent bij deleerstoelgroe p Microbiologie Stellingen 1. Halorespiratie is een weinig efficiente wijze van ademhalen. Dit proefschrift 2. Halorespiratie moet worden opgevat als verbreding en niet als specialisatie van het genus Desulfitobacterium. Dit proefschrift 3. Reductieve dehalogenases zijn geen nieuwe enzymen. 4. 16S-rRNA probes zijn minder geschikt voor het aantonen van specifieke metabole activiteiten in een complex ecosysteem. Loffler etal. (2000) AEM66 : 1369;Gottscha l &Kroonema n (2000)Bode m3 : 102 5. Het "twin-arginine" transportsysteem wordt niet goed genoeg begrepen om op basis van het voorkomen van het "twin-arginine" motief enzymen te lokaliseren. Berks etal. (2000)Mol .Microbiol .35 : 260 6. Asbesthoudende bodem is niet verontreinigd. 7. Biologische groente is een pleonasme. Stellingen behorende bij het proefschrift 'Biochemistry and physiology of halorespiration by Desulfitobacterium dehalogenans' van Bram A. van de Pas Wageningen, 6 december 2000 MJOQ^O \lZ°]0 ^ Biochemistry and Physiology of Halorespiration by Desulfitobacterium dehalogenans BramA. van de Pas Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor op gezag van derecto r magnificus van Wageningen Universiteit, dr. ir. L. Speelman, in het openbaar
    [Show full text]
  • Electron Donor and Acceptor Utilization by Halorespiring Bacteria'
    Electron donor andaccepto r utilizationb y halorespiring bacteria Maurice L.G.C. Luijten CENTRALS LANDBOUWCATALOGUS 0000 0950 9080 Promotoren Prof.dr .W.M . de Vos Hoogleraar ind eMicrobiologi c Wageningen Universiteit Prof.dr .ir .A.J.M .Stam s Persoonlijk hoogleraar bij hetlaboratoriu mvoo r Microbiologic Laboratorium voor Microbiologic, Wageningen Universiteit Copromotoren Dr.G .Schra a Universitair docent Laboratorium voor Microbiologic, Wageningen Universiteit Dr.A.A.M . Langenhoff Senior researcher/project leader Milieubiotechnologie, TNO-MEP Promotiecommissie Prof. E.J.Bouwe r John's Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA Prof.dr .C .Hollige r EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland Dr.F .Volkerin g Tauw bv, Deventer, Nederland Prof. dr.ir .W.H . Rulkens Wageningen Universteit Dit onderzoek is uitgevoerd binnen de onderzoekschool SENSE (Netherlands Research School forth e Socio-Economic andNatura l Sciences ofth e Environment). LV''-:- v. •:-:::'.Ifir Electron donor and acceptor utilizationb y halorespiring bacteria Maurice L.G.C.Luijte n Proefschrift Terverkrijgin g van de graadva n doctor opgeza gva n derecto r magnificus van Wageningen Universiteit, prof. dr. ir. L. Speelman, inhe t openbaar te verdedigen opvrijda g 11 juni 2004 desnamiddag s te half twee in deAula . \ '\ i ocXi ^ Electron donor and acceptor utilization byhalorespirin g bacteria Maurice L.G.C. Luijten Ph.D.thesi sWageninge n University, Wageningen, The Netherlands 2004 ISBN 90-5804-067-1 Front cover: Modified EMpictur e ofSulfurospirillum halorespirans PCE-M2 — ry ' Stellingen 1.El k nadeel heb zijn voordeel. Dit proefschrift. 2. De ene volledige reductie van PCE is de andere nog niet. Dit proefschrift. 3. Sectorale communicatie reikt niet ver genoeg. HRH the Prince of Orange, Wat.
    [Show full text]
  • Detection of Dehalococcoides Spp. by Peptide Nucleic Acid Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization
    This article was published in Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, 24, 142- 149, 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000362790 Detection of Dehalococcoides spp. by Peptide Nucleic Acid Fluorescent in situ Hybridization Anthony S. Dankoa, c Silvia J. Fonteneteb Daniel de Aquino Leiteb, e Patrícia O. Leitãoa,c Carina Almeidab, d Charles E. Schaeferf Simon Vainbergf Robert J. Steffanf Nuno F. Azevedob aCentro de Investigação em Geo-Ambiente e Recursos (CIGAR), Departamento de Engenharia de Minas, Faculdade de Engenharia, and bLaboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, and Energy and Biotechnology Engineering (LEPABE), Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Porto, cCentro de Recursos Naturais e Ambiente (CERENA), Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisboa, and dInstitute for Biotechnology and Bioengineering (IBB), Center of Biological Engineering, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal; eLANASE, Departamento de Engenharia de Alimentos, Faculdade de Engenharia, Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, Dourados, Brazil; fCB&I Federal Services, LLC., Lawrenceville, N.J., USA Abstract Chlorinated solvents including tetrachloroethene (perchloroethene and trichloroethene), are widely used industrial solvents. Improper use and disposal of these chemicals has led to a widespread contamination. Anaerobic treatment technologies that utilize Dehalococcoides spp. can be an effective tool to remediate these contaminated sites. There- fore, the aim of this study was to develop, optimize and validate peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probes for the detection of Dehalococcoides spp. in both pure and mixed cultures. PNA probes were designed by adapting previously published DNA probes targeting the region of the point mutations de- scribed for discriminating between the Dehalococcoides spp. strain CBDB1 and strain 195 lineages.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Role of Dehalococcoides Organisms in the Natural Attenuation of Chlorinated Ethylenes in Ground Water
    Evaluation of the Role of Dehalococcoides Organisms in the Natural Attenuation of Chlorinated Ethylenes in Ground Water EPA/600/R-06/029 July 2006 Evaluation of the Role of Dehalococcoides Organisms in the Natural Attenuation of Chlorinated Ethylenes in Ground Water Xiaoxia Lu National Research Council Post Doctoral Associate tenable at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development National Risk Management Laboratory Ada, Oklahoma 74820 Donald H. Kampbell, and John T. Wilson U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development National Risk Management Laboratory Ada, Oklahoma 74820 Support from the U.S. Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence through Interagency Agreement # RW-57939566 Project Officer John T. Wilson Ground Water and Ecosystems Restoration Division National Risk Management Research Laboratory Ada, Oklahoma 74820 National Risk Management Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Cincinnati, Ohio 45268 Notice The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through its Office of Research and Development funded the research described here. This work was conducted under in-house Task 3674, Monitored Natural Attenuation of Chlorinated Solvents, and in association with and with support from the U.S. Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence through Interagency Agreement # RW-57939566, Identification of Processes that Control Natural Attenuation at Chlorinated Solvent Spill Sites. Mention of trade names and commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. All research projects making conclusions and recommendations based on environmentally related measurements and funded by the U.S. Environ- mental Protection Agency are required to participate in the Agency Quality Assurance Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhanced in Situ Reductive Dechlorination for Groundwater
    Enhanced In Situ Reductive Dechlorination for Groundwater On this page: Schematic Introduction Other Technology Names Description Development Status Applicability Cost Duration Implementability Considerations Resources Schematic Enhanced In Situ Bioremediation Introduction https://frtr.gov/matrix/Enhanced-In-Situ-Reductive-Dechlorinated-for-Groundwater/ 1/18 8/3/2020 Technology Screening Matrix | Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable Enhanced in situ reductive dechlorination (ERD) is the process of modifying chemical, physical, and biological conditions in the aquifer to stimulate the microbial degradation of contaminants under anaerobic conditions to harmless end products (e.g., carbon dioxide [CO2 ] or ethene). It is used to remediate volatile organic compounds (CVOCs) (e.g., trichloroethylene [TCE]) and certain pesticides and other chlorinated organic contaminants. ERD commonly is used to treat dissolved phase plumes downgradient of source areas, but also can be designed to treat CVOC source areas including those that contain dense non- aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL). Other Technology Names Biostimulation Bioaugmentation Enhanced anaerobic bioremediation Enhanced Natural Attenuation Halorespiration Dehalorespiration Description ERD is the process through which chlorine atoms attached to an organic compound are sequentially removed under anoxic (no oxygen) conditions. Application of ERD is comprised of biostimulation and sometimes bioaugmentation to modify existing geochemical and biological conditions in an aquifer to facilitate
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Environmental Engineering © Asce / August 2012
    Effects of Chitin Purity and Proppant Loading on the Bioremediation of Chloroethenes Jennifer A. McElhoe1 and Rachel A. Brennan2 Abstract: Hydraulic fracturing (or fracking) of substrates and proppants into contaminated soils is a developing, but understudied, practice of stimulating in situ bioremediation. In this work, three different purities of the substrate crab shell chitin (SC-20, SC-40, and SC-80), two proppant loadings (sand:chitin mass ratios of 5∶1 and 15∶1), and three chloroethene concentrations (1 and 10 mg∕L trichloroethene, and 1:5mg∕L cis-1,2-dichloroethene) were experimentally and statistically examined to determine their effects on halorespiration. The least refined crab shell, SC-20, produced the greatest variety of electron donors, converted the highest percentage of contaminant mass to ethene, and supported a significantly greater Dehalococcoides population than the other substrates. Although influent chloroethene concentration and proppant loading did not significantly affect halorespiration (p-values > 0:079), decreasing the proppant loading from 15∶1to5∶1 increased the longevity of electron-donor production. These results indicate that funds need not be expended for purification of crab shell substrates, and that SC-20 should be used with proppant loadings of 5∶1 or lower to maximize the duration of electron-donor production at sites with potential biodegradation rate limitations. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000541. © 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers. CE Database subject headings: Remediation; Biological processes; Groundwater pollution; Soil pollution; Solvents; TCE. Author keywords: Halorespiration; Trichloroethene; TCE; Crab shell; Fracking. Introduction electron donors generally limits natural attenuation in subsurface environments (He et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodegradation of Chlorinated Solvents Biodegradation Of
    BiodegradationBiodegradation ofof ChlorinatedChlorinated SolventsSolvents Jim A. Field Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Arizona [email protected] 1 1 Literature Review Field, J.A. & R. Sierra-Alvarez (2004) Biodegradability of chlorinated solvents and related chlorinated aliphatic compounds. Reviews in Environmental Science & Bio/Technology 3:185-254. 2 2 Biodegradation Reaction Biodegradation = Redox Reactions reduction E-donor + E-acceptor Oxidized + Reduced E-donor E-acceptor oxidation 3 3 Example: vinyl chloride as electron donor reduction H Cl - + O2 CO2 + Cl + H2O HH oxidation Example: perchloroethylene as electron acceptor reduction Cl Cl H H • CH3OH + CO2 + + 4Cl Cl Cl HH oxidation 4 4 Definitions Biodegradation Biodegradation: biologically catalyzed transformation of chemical resulting in simpler forms Mineralization: Conversion of organics to mineral products H Cl - CO2 + Cl HH Biotransformation: Transformation of pollutant by a biological process Cl H Cl O Cl Cl Cl Cl H 5 5 Definitions Biodegradation Growth Substrate, Primary Metabolism: Pollutant (substrate) used as the primary energy and carbon source for microbial growth as pollutant is degraded biocatalyst concentration increases Cometabolism: Accidental conversion of pollutant by enzymes and cofactors used for the metabolism of a primary substrate Cl H Cl O H Cl Cl Cl Cl MMO CH4 CH3OH CO2 6 6 Definitions Biodegradation Reductive Dehalogenation: Microbially catalyzed replacement of a halogen atom on an organic compound with a hydrogen
    [Show full text]
  • Reductive Dechlorination of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-P-Dioxins
    REDUCTIVE DECHLORINATION OF POLYCHLORINATED DIBENZO-P-DIOXINS BY DEHALOCOCCOIDES-ENRICHED CULTURES FROM CONTAMINATED SOILS AND SEDIMENTS By HANG THUY DAM A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Microbial Biology Written under the direction of Max M. Häggblom And approved by _________________________________ _________________________________ _________________________________ _________________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey October, 2016 ABTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Reductive Dechlorination of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins by Dehalococcoides-enriched Cultures from Contaminated Soils and Sediments By HANG THUY DAM Dissertation Director Max M. Häggblom Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) are pervasive environmental pollutants and resistant in soil and sediment environments. Under anaerobic conditions, PCDDs can undergo reductive dechlorination which produces less chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin congeners, these compounds are more susceptible to further degradation. The process is mediated by dehalogenating bacteria, some of which gain energy from the process by using PCDDs as terminal electron acceptors. The objective of our study was to use a conventional enrichment approach to enrich for dehalogenating bacteria, to investigate the PCDD dechlorination activity and the microbial community of enrichment cultures, and to investigate genomes of the abundant dehalogenating
    [Show full text]
  • Organohalide Respiring Bacteria and Reductive Dehalogenases: Key Tools in Organohalide Bioremediation
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Frontiers - Publisher Connector REVIEW published: 01 March 2016 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00249 Organohalide Respiring Bacteria and Reductive Dehalogenases: Key Tools in Organohalide Bioremediation Bat-Erdene Jugder 1, Haluk Ertan 1, 2, Susanne Bohl 1, 3, Matthew Lee 1, Christopher P. Marquis 1* and Michael Manefield 1 1 School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2 Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey, 3 Department of Biotechnology, Mannheim University of Applied Sciences, Mannheim, Germany Organohalides are recalcitrant pollutants that have been responsible for substantial contamination of soils and groundwater. Organohalide-respiring bacteria (ORB) provide a potential solution to remediate contaminated sites, through their ability to use organohalides as terminal electron acceptors to yield energy for growth (i.e., organohalide respiration). Ideally, this process results in non- or lesser-halogenated compounds that are mostly less toxic to the environment or more easily degraded. At the heart of these processes are reductive dehalogenases (RDases), which are membrane bound enzymes coupled with other components that facilitate dehalogenation of organohalides Edited by: Gavin Collins, to generate cellular energy. This review focuses on RDases, concentrating on those which National University of Ireland, Ireland have been purified (partially or wholly) and functionally characterized. Further, the paper Reviewed by: reviews the major bacteria involved in organohalide breakdown and the evidence for Jun-Jie Zhang, microbial evolution of RDases. Finally, the capacity for using ORB in a bioremediation Wuhan Institute of Virology, China Christopher L.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodegradability of Chlorinated Aromatic Compounds
    SCIENCE DOSSIER Biodegradability of chlorinated aromatic compounds J. A. Field & R. Sierra-Alvarez University of Arizona July 2007 July 2007 - Science Dossier 12 This publication is the eleventh in a series of Science Dossiers providing the scientific community with reliable information on selected issues. If you require more copies, please send an email indicating name and mailing address to [email protected]. The document is also available as a PDF file on www.eurochlor.org Science Dossiers published in this series: 1. Trichloroacetic acid in the environment (March 2002) 2. Chloroform in the environment: Occurrence, sources, sinks and effects (May 2002) 3. Dioxins and furans in the environment (January 2003) 4. How chlorine in molecules affects biological activity (November 2003) 5. Hexachlorobutadiene – sources, environmental fate and risk characterisation (October 2004) 6. Natural organohalogens (October 2004) 7. Euro Chlor workshop on soil chlorine chemistry 8. Biodegradability of chlorinated solvents and related chlorinated aliphatic compounds (December 2004) 9. Hexachlorobenzene - Sources, environmental fate and risk characterisation (January 2005) 10. Long-range transport of chemicals in the environment (April 2006) 11. Pentachlorobenzene – Sources, environmental fate and risk characterization (July 2008) 12. Biodegradability of chlorinated aromatic compounds (July 2007) 13. Metallic mercury: the biological effects of long-time, low to moderate exposures 14. The origin and fate of mercury species in the environment Copyright & Reproduction The copyright in this publication belongs to Euro Chlor. No part of this publication may be stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying or recording, or otherwise, without the permission of Euro Chlor.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineered Approaches to in Situ Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents: Fundamentals and Field Applications EPA 542-R-00-008 July 2000 (Revised)
    United States Solid Waste and EPA 542-R-00-008 Environmental Protection Emergency Response July 2000 (revised) Agency (5102G) www.epa.gov clu-in.org EPA Engineered Approaches to In Situ Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents: Fundamentals and Field Applications EPA 542-R-00-008 July 2000 (revised) ENGINEERED APPROACHES TO IN SITU BIOREMEDIATION OF CHLORINATED SOLVENTS: FUNDAMENTALS AND FIELD APPLICATIONS U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Technology Innovation Office Washington, DC 20460 Engineered Approaches to In Situ Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER This document was prepared by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Technology Innovation Office under EPA Contract Number 68-W-99-003. Information in this report is derived from a variety of references (including personal communications with experts in the field), some of which have been peer-reviewed. This report has undergone EPA and external review by experts in the field. Key terms used in this report are defined in a glossary, and shown in bold print. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. For more information about this project, please contact: Linda Fiedler, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Technology Innovation Office, Ariel Rios Building, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. (MS 5102G), Washington, D.C., 20460; (703) 603-7194; e-mail: [email protected]. For technical questions concerning in situ bioremediation, please contact: Ann Azadpour-Keeley, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Subsurface Protection and Remediation Division, P.O. Box # 1198, Ada, Oklahoma, 74820; (580) 436-8890; e-mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Protocol for in Situ Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents Using Edible Oil
    FINAL Protocol forIn Situ Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents Using Edible Oil FINAL PROTOCOL FOR IN SITU BIOREMEDIATION OF CHLORINATED SOLVENTS USING EDIBLE OIL October 2007 Prepared for: Air Force Center for Engineering and the Environmental Environmental Science Division Technology Transfer Outreach Office ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This protocol was prepared by Solutions IES, Inc. (Solutions IES), Terra Systems, Inc. (TSI), and Parsons Infrastructure & Technology Group, Inc. (Parsons) under contract to the Air Force Center for Engineering and the Environmental (AFCEE). This document is intended to assist AFCEE and their United States Department of Defense (DoD) technology-transition partners in evaluating and applying edible oil and edible oil emulsions as a long-lasting organic substrate to enhance the in situ anaerobic bioremediation of chlorinated solvents in groundwater. The authors acknowledge the assistance of numerous individuals who provided management, oversight, and review services. These individuals and their affiliations are listed in Appendix A. DISCLAIMER This protocol is a work prepared for the Technology Transfer Outreach Office of the United States Air Force Center for Engineering and the Environmental (AFCEE) by Solutions-IES, Inc. Terra Systems, Inc., Parsons Infrastructure & Technology Group, Inc., and representatives from AFCEE. In no event shall either the United States Government, Solutions-IES, Inc., Terra Systems, Inc., or Parsons Infrastructure & Technology Group, Inc. have any responsibility or liability for any
    [Show full text]