DOCSLIB.ORG

RR-699 October 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RR-699 October 2014 Understanding Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Behavior in Groundwater: Guidance on the Investigation, Assessment and Limitations of Monitored Natural Attenuation RR-699 October 2014 This document is intended solely as guidance and does not contain any mandatory requirements except where requirements found in statute or administrative rule are referenced. Any regulatory decisions made by the Department of Natural Resources in any matter addressed by this guidance will be made by applying the governing statutes and administrative rules to the relevant facts. The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources provides equal opportunity in its employment, programs, services, and functions under an Affirmative Action Plan. If you have any questions, please write to Chief, Public Civil Rights, Office of Civil Rights, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C. Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20240.This publication is available in alternative format (large print, Braille, etc.) upon request. Please call for more information. Note: If you need technical assistance or more information, call the Accessibility Coordinator at 608-267-7490 / TTY Access via relay - 711 Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources · P.O. Box 7921, Madison, WI 53707 · dnr.wi.gov, search “brownfield” THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Understanding Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Behavior in Groundwater: Investigation, Assessment and Limitations of Monitored Natural Attenuation TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 ........................................................................................................................... 1 PURPOSE & INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 1.1 PURPOSE ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 APPLICABILITY.................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.4 LIMITATIONS ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.5 REGULATORY REVIEW OF SUBMITTALS ............................................................................................................ 4 1.6 DISCLAIMER...................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.7 OTHER RELEVANT GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS ..................................................................................................... 5 CHAPTER 2 ........................................................................................................................... 7 LAYING THE BASIS FOR MNA: ............................................................................................... 7 CHLORINATED HYDROCARBON BEHAVIOR, SITE INVESTIGATION .................................. 7 AND MONITORING NETWORK ................................................................................................ 7 2.1 OVERVIEW OF CHLORINATED HYDROCARBON BEHAVIOR IN THE SUBSURFACE .............................................. 7 2.1.1 Physical behavior of chlorinated hydrocarbons ................................................................... 7 2.1.2 Degradation processes affecting chlorinated hydrocarbons ............................................. 12 2.1.2.1 Reductive dechlorination .............................................................................................................. 12 2.1.2.2 Oxidative destruction .................................................................................................................... 12 2.1.2.3 Abiotic destruction ........................................................................................................................ 13 2.1.3 Chlorinated hydrocarbon movement in the subsurface .................................................... 13 2.2 SITE INVESTIGATION ...................................................................................................................................... 13 2.2.1 Identifying soil and groundwater contamination ............................................................... 14 2.2.1.1 Degree & extent of contamination ................................................................................................ 14 2.2.1.2 Hydrogeologic and geochemical framework ................................................................................. 15 2.2.1.3 Define potential receptors and exposure pathways. ..................................................................... 15 2.2.2 Predictions of contaminant fate & transport ...................................................................... 17 2.2.3 Site investigation report ........................................................................................................ 17 2.3 SELECTING AND EVALUATING REMEDIAL ACTIONS ....................................................................................... 18 2.4 LONG-TERM MONITORING WELL NETWORK................................................................................................... 19 2.4.1 Identify primary contaminant flow paths ........................................................................... 19 2.4.2 Monitoring plume behavior ................................................................................................. 20 2.4.2.1 Locating monitoring well transects ................................................................................................ 20 2.4.2.2 Defining the plume vertically ......................................................................................................... 21 2.4.2.3 Defining the plume horizontally..................................................................................................... 21 2.4.2.4 Sentinel wells................................................................................................................................. 22 CHAPTER 3 ..........................................................................................................................25 TOOLS TO ASSESS NATURAL ATTENUATION OF CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS ....25 i 3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS NECESSARY FOR DEGRADATION OF CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS .......... 25 3.1.1 Microorganisms capable of degrading contaminants ........................................................ 25 3.1.2 Oxidation-reduction (redox) capacity of groundwater ...................................................... 26 3.1.3 Availability of a carbon source (electron donors) .............................................................. 26 3.1.4 Absence of competing electron acceptors ........................................................................... 27 3.2 ASSESSING PATTERNS OF NATURAL ATTENUATION IN GROUNDWATER ......................................................... 27 3.2.1 Geochemical footprints ......................................................................................................... 27 3.2.1.1 Evidence of specific natural attenuation mechanisms ................................................................... 28 3.2.1.2 Establish effectiveness of the groundwater monitoring networks. ................................................. 30 3.2.2 Patterns of contaminant degradation .................................................................................. 30 3.3 DETERMINING NATURAL ATTENUATION RATES ............................................................................................. 31 3.3.1 Establishing steady state ....................................................................................................... 33 3.3.1.1 Plots of monitoring data ................................................................................................................ 33 3.3.1.2 Non-parametric statistics .............................................................................................................. 33 3.3.1.3 Mass loss calculations .................................................................................................................. 34 3.3.2 Estimating decay rates .......................................................................................................... 36 3.3.2.1 First order decay at a point in the plume (Temporal Analysis) ...................................................... 37 3.3.2.2 First order decay along the plume centerline (Spatial Analysis) ................................................... 37 3.3.2.3 First order decay in the source area (Temporal Analysis) ............................................................ 38 3.3.2.4 Buscheck and Alcantar procedure (Spatial Analysis) ................................................................... 38 3.3.2.5 Decay rates using mass flux measurements (Spatial Analysis).................................................... 39 3.4 DATA EVALUATION ......................................................................................................................................... 39 CHAPTER 4 ..........................................................................................................................41 MONITORING MNA REMEDY .................................................................................................41
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Packet of Wiser Reports on Acetone Acetonitrile
    Ac&tone ^Hazmat - NFPA Hazard Classification Page 1 of Acetone CAS RN: 67-64-1 Hazmat - NFPA Hazard Classification SOMS DocID 2085807 Health: 1 (Slight) Materials that, on exposure, would cause significant irritation, but only minor residual injury, including those requiring the use of an approved air-purifying respirator. These materials are only slightly hazardous to health and only breathing protection is needed. Flammability: 3 (Severe) rhis degree includes Class IB and 1C flammable liquids and materials that can be easily ignited under almost all normal temperature conditions. Water may be ineffective in controlling or extinguishing fires in such materials. Instability: 0 (Minimal) This degree includes materials that are normally stable, even under fire exposure conditions, and that do not react with water.- Norma lire fighting procedures may be used. Printed by WISER for Windows (v2.3.231, database v2.108) HHS/NIH, National Library of Medicine AR000018 iile://C:\Documents and Settings\Gham\Application Data\National Library of Medicine\WISER\2.3.231.628... 9/27/20 Acetone ^Key Info Page 1 of Acetone CAS RN: 67-64-1 Key Info FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS (Polar / Water-Miscible) • HIGHLY FLAMMABLE: Easily ignited by heat, sparks or flames • CAUTION: Very low flash point; use of water spray when fighting fire may be inefficient Printed by WISER for Windows (v2.3.231, database v2.108) HHS/NIH, National Library of Medicine AR000019 file://C:\Documents and Settings\Gham\Application Data\National Library of Medicine\WISER\2.3.231.628../ 9/27/20 Acetone - -Hazmat - Explosive Limits / Potential Page 1 of Acetone CAS RIM: 67-64-1 Hazmat - Explosive Limits / Potential Highly flammable liquid.
    [Show full text]
  • AP-42 Vol. I CH1.6 Wood Residue Combustion in Boilers
    1.6 Wood Residue Combustion In Boilers 1.6.1 General1-6 The burning of wood residue in boilers is mostly confined to those industries where it is available as a byproduct. It is burned both to obtain heat energy and to alleviate possible solid residue disposal problems. In boilers, wood residue is normally burned in the form of hogged wood, bark, sawdust, shavings, chips, mill rejects, sanderdust, or wood trim. Heating values for this residue range from about 4,500 British thermal units/pound (Btu/lb) of fuel on a wet, as-fired basis, to about 8,000 Btu/lb for dry wood. The moisture content of as-fired wood is typically near 50 weight percent for the pulp, paper and lumber industries and is typically 10 to 15 percent for the furniture industry. However, moisture contents may vary from 5 to 75 weight percent depending on the residue type and storage operations. Generally, bark is the major type of residue burned in pulp mills; either a mixture of wood and bark residue or wood residue alone is burned most frequently in the lumber, furniture, and plywood industries. 1.6.2 Firing Practices5, 7, 8 Various boiler firing configurations are used for burning wood residue. One common type of boiler used in smaller operations is the Dutch oven. This unit is widely used because it can burn fuels with very high moisture content. Fuel is fed into the oven through an opening in the top of a refractory-lined furnace. The fuel accumulates in a cone-shaped pile on a flat or sloping grate.
    [Show full text]
  • Dichloromethane; CASRN 75-09-2
    Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chemical Assessment Summary National Center for Environmental Assessment Dichloromethane; CASRN 75-09-2 Human health assessment information on a chemical substance is included in the IRIS database only after a comprehensive review of toxicity data, as outlined in the IRIS assessment development process. Sections I (Health Hazard Assessments for Noncarcinogenic Effects) and II (Carcinogenicity Assessment for Lifetime Exposure) present the conclusions that were reached during the assessment development process. Supporting information and explanations of the methods used to derive the values given in IRIS are provided in the guidance documents located on the IRIS website. STATUS OF DATA FOR Dichloromethane File First On-Line 01/31/1987 Category (section) Assessment Available? Last Revised Oral RfD (I.A.) Yes 11/18/2011 Inhalation RfC (I.B.) Yes 11/18/2011 Carcinogenicity Assessment (II.) Yes 11/18/2011 I. Chronic Health Hazard Assessments for Noncarcinogenic Effects I.A. Reference Dose for Chronic Oral Exposure (RfD) Substance Name — Dichloromethane CASRN — 75-09-2 Section I.A. Last Revised — 11/18/2011 The RfD is an estimate (with uncertainty spanning perhaps an order of magnitude) of a daily oral exposure to the human population (including sensitive subgroups) that is likely to be without an appreciable risk of deleterious effects during a lifetime. The RfD is intended for use in risk assessments for health effects known or assumed to be produced through a nonlinear (presumed threshold) mode of action. It is expressed in units of mg/kg-day. Please refer to the guidance documents for an elaboration of these concepts.
    [Show full text]
  • Chlorinated Solvent Bioremediation: Fundamentals and Practical Application for Remedial Project Managers Presented By: Christopher Marks, Ph.D
    Chlorinated Solvent Bioremediation: Fundamentals and Practical Application for Remedial Project Managers Presented by: Christopher Marks, Ph.D. & Carolyn Acheson, Ph.D. US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development National Risk Management Research Laboratory CLU-IN Webinar Nov. 14, 2018 Source: Accelerated Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents, Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council and Remediation and Technology Development Forum, 2003 1 Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents Source: Accelerated Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents, Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council and Remediation and Technology 2 Development Forum, 2003 Part I: Introduction to Chlorinated Solvent Properties and Anaerobic Reductive Dechlorination 3 Terminology • Anaerobic: Microbial metabolic processes occurring in the absence of oxygen. • Anaerobic Reductive Dechlorination: The biological removal of a chlorine atom from an organic compound and replacement with a hydrogen atom in a reducing environment. • Biodegradation aka biotransformation: Biologically mediated reactions which convert one chemical to another. For example, PCE is converted to TCE when anaerobic reductive reactions remove a chlorine molecule. • Bioremediation: The engineered approaches using microorganisms to biodegrade contaminants. • Biostimulation: The addition of organic electron donors and nutrients to enhance the rate of reductive dechlorination by the native microflora. • Bioaugmentation: The addition of beneficial microorganisms to enhance the capacity
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of in Situ Bioremediation of Chlorinated Ethene DNAPL Source Zones
    INTERSTATE TECHNOLOGY & REGULATORY COUNCIL Warning! This document has not been amended since publication. Some content may be out of date and may no longer apply. INTERSTATE TECHNOLOGY & REGULATORY COUNCIL Technology Overview Overview of In Situ Bioremediation of Chlorinated Ethene DNAPL Source Zones October 2005 Prepared by The Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council Bioremediation of DNAPLs Team ABOUT ITRC Established in 1995, the Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council (ITRC) is a state-led, national coalition of personnel from the environmental regulatory agencies of more than 40 states and the District of Columbia, three federal agencies, tribes, and public and industry stakeholders. The organization is devoted to reducing barriers to and speeding interstate deployment of, better, more cost-effective, innovative environmental techniques. ITRC operates as a committee of the Environmental Research Institute of the States (ERIS), a Section 501(c)(3) public charity that supports the Environmental Council of the States (ECOS) through its educational and research activities aimed at improving the environment in the United States and providing a forum for state environmental policy makers. More information about ITRC and its available products and services can be found on the Internet at www.itrcweb.org. DISCLAIMER This document is designed to help regulators and others develop a consistent approach to their evaluation, regulatory approval, and deployment of specific technologies at specific sites. Although the information in this document is believed to be reliable and accurate, this document and all material set forth herein are provided without warranties of any kind, either express or implied, including but not limited to warranties of the accuracy or completeness of information contained in the document.
    [Show full text]
  • NMR Chemical Shifts of Common Laboratory Solvents As Trace Impurities
    7512 J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 7512-7515 NMR Chemical Shifts of Common Laboratory Solvents as Trace Impurities Hugo E. Gottlieb,* Vadim Kotlyar, and Abraham Nudelman* Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel Received June 27, 1997 In the course of the routine use of NMR as an aid for organic chemistry, a day-to-day problem is the identifica- tion of signals deriving from common contaminants (water, solvents, stabilizers, oils) in less-than-analyti- cally-pure samples. This data may be available in the literature, but the time involved in searching for it may be considerable. Another issue is the concentration dependence of chemical shifts (especially 1H); results obtained two or three decades ago usually refer to much Figure 1. Chemical shift of HDO as a function of tempera- more concentrated samples, and run at lower magnetic ture. fields, than today’s practice. 1 13 We therefore decided to collect H and C chemical dependent (vide infra). Also, any potential hydrogen- shifts of what are, in our experience, the most popular bond acceptor will tend to shift the water signal down- “extra peaks” in a variety of commonly used NMR field; this is particularly true for nonpolar solvents. In solvents, in the hope that this will be of assistance to contrast, in e.g. DMSO the water is already strongly the practicing chemist. hydrogen-bonded to the solvent, and solutes have only a negligible effect on its chemical shift. This is also true Experimental Section for D2O; the chemical shift of the residual HDO is very NMR spectra were taken in a Bruker DPX-300 instrument temperature-dependent (vide infra) but, maybe counter- (300.1 and 75.5 MHz for 1H and 13C, respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • Considerations for the Collection and Evaluation of Natural Attenuation Parameters at Sites Contaminated with Chlorinated Solvents
    CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE COLLECTION AND EVALUATION OF NATURAL ATTENUATION PARAMETERS AT SITES CONTAMINATED WITH CHLORINATED SOLVENTS Chlorine • Hydrogen • Carbon • Bond "\. ( . I Vinyl Chloride I . ~ I Cis-1,2-Dichloroethene I ITrichloroethene I .,. Source Area Biological Active Area DowngradientI Area Filure 3 Anaerobic Reductive Dechlorination ofa Trichloroethene Plnm.e Prepared by Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Division of Waste Management Bureau of Waste Cleanup Hazardous Waste Cleanup Section April 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 1.0 IN'TR.ODUCTION ........................................................................................ 1 ~ 2.0 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF CHLORINATED ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBON BIODEGRADATION................................................. 2 2.1 Bacteria 2.2 Electron Acceptor Reactions 2.3 Electron Donor Reactions 2.4 Co-Metabolism 3.0 NATURAL ATTENUATION BY PHYSICAL PROCESSES ................... 4 4.0 METABOLIC BY-PRODUCTS AND REDOX PROCESSES IN GROUNDWATER SYSTEMS ................................................................... 4 S.O EVIDENCE USED TO SUPPORT NATURAL ATTENUATION•••••••••• S 5.1 Direct Evidence S.2 Examine Changes 5.3 Laboratory microcosm studies 6.0 METHODOLOGY USED FOR DATA REVIEW AND SITE EVALUATION........................................................................................... 6 7.0 NATURAL ATTENUATION SAMPLING AND DATA EVALUATION METHODOLOGY..................................................................................... 9 7.1 Monitor Well
    [Show full text]
  • Principles and Practices of Enhanced Anaerobic Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents
    FINAL Principles and Practices of Enhanced Anaerobic Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents August 2004 This page intentionally left blank PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES OF ENHANCED ANAEROBIC BIOREMEDIATION OF CHLORINATED SOLVENTS August 2004 Prepared for: Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence Brooks City-Base, Texas Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center Port Hueneme, California and Environmental Security Technology Certification Program Arlington, Virginia This page intentionally left blank ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Parsons Corporation (Parsons) prepared this Principles and Practices document under contract to the Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence (AFCEE, Contract F41624-00- D-8024) and the Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center (NFESC, Contract N47408-98- D-7527). The NFESC contract was funded by the Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP). The United States Army Corp of Engineers (USACE) assisted with technical review. This document is intended to assist AFCEE, NFESC, ESTCP, USACE and their United States (US) Department of Defense (DoD) technology-transition partners in evaluating and applying enhanced in situ anaerobic bioremediation for restoration of groundwater contaminated with chlorinated solvents. The authors acknowledge the assistance of numerous individuals who provided review services, and to several environmental contractors that provided case studies and information regarding respective areas of expertise. These individuals and their affiliations are listed in Appendix A. - i - 022/738863/28.doc DISCLAIMER In no event shall either the United States Government or Parsons have any responsibility or liability for any consequences of any use, misuse, inability to use, or reliance on the information contained herein; nor does either warrant or otherwise represent in any way the accuracy, adequacy, efficacy, or applicability of the contents hereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Alberta Environment
    Chemical Fact Sheets Manganese, Mn CAS No. 7439-96-5 WHAT IS MANGANESE? Manganese is a gray-pink metal. USES Manganese is used in the manufacture of ceramics, matches, glass, dyes and welding rods. It is a component of steel, steel alloys, cast iron, superalloys & nonferrous alloys, as well as a chemical intermediate for high purity salts. Manganese is used as a purifying & scavenging agent in metal production. SOURCES Manganese is a naturally occurring substance found in many types of rock; it is ubiquitous in the environment and found in low levels in water air, soil, and food. It is commonly found in the environment as a result of its use in the manufacture of the above-noted materials. ENVIRONMENTAL LEVELS AND EXPOSURE Exposure to manganese might include: • Inhaling it in ambient air, particularly near industries involved in the manufacture of manganese-containing materials. Occupational exposure via inhalation is most common. Ambient air concentrations of manganese were not reported in 1997 or 1998 in Alberta. ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND BEHAVIOUR • Manganese, as an aerosol, may dissolve upon contact with water on a time scale of a few minutes. TOXICITY • Manganese is an element considered essential to human health. • Inhalation of manganese compounds in aerosols or fine dusts may cause "metal fume fever”. MANGANESE Page 1 of 2 • Early symptoms of chronic manganese poisoning may include languor, sleepiness and weakness in the legs. Emotional disturbances such as uncontrollable laughter and a spastic gait with tendency to fall in walking are common in more advanced cases. • Chronic manganese poisoning is not a fatal disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerobic Cometabolism of Chlorinated Aliphatic Hydrocarbons by Subsurface Microbes Grown on Methane, Propane and Butane from the Mcclellan Air Force Base
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Adisorn Tovanabootr for the degree of Masters of Science in Civil Engineering presented on April 23, 1997. Title: Aerobic Cometabolism of Chlorinated Aliphatic Hydrocarbons by Subsurface Microbes Grown on Methane, Propane and Butane from the McClellan Air Force Base. Abstract approved: Lewis Semprini Subsurface microorganisms from the McClellan Air Force Base were grown in batch aquifer microcosms on methane, propane, and butane as gaseous cometabolic substrates. The potential for aerobic cometabolism of chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons including trichloroethylene (TCE), 1,1,1-trichloroethane (1,1,1-TCA), and chloroform (CF) was determined. Stimulation of microorganisms on all of the substrates tested indicates a diverse microbial community exists in the McClellan subsurface. Indigenous methane and propane-utilizers were capable of transforming TCE and CF. Propane- utilizers very effectively transformed TCA, while methane-utilizers could not transform 1,1,1-TCA. The butane-utilizers were not able to degrade any of the CAHs tested. TCE was transformed most rapidly during the period of active methane consumption, and continued at a slower rate for about 1 weeks after methane was consumed. The propane culture remained active for up to four weeks after propane was consumed, and the rate followed first order kinetics. Different TCE transformation yields (Tv) (mg CAH/mg substrate) developed in replicate microcosms with time. Changes in TCE transformation ability resulted from changes in TCE concentration or TCE product toxicity. Both methane and propane-utilizers showed a positive correlation between initial TCE transformation rates and primary substrate utilization rates. The ratio of the zero order TCE transformation rate to primary substrate utilization rate was directly proportional to the ultimate transformation yield.
    [Show full text]
  • Biochemistry and Physiology of Halorespiration by Desulfitobacterium Dehalogenans
    Biochemistry and Physiology of Halorespiration by Desulfitobacterium dehalogenans ..?.^TJ?*LE_ LANDBOUWCATALOGU S 0000 0807 1728 Promotor: Dr.W.M . deVo s hoogleraar in de microbiologie Co-promotoren: Dr.ir .A.J.M .Stam s universitair hoofddocent bij deleerstoelgroe p Microbiologie Dr.ir . G. Schraa universitair docent bij deleerstoelgroe p Microbiologie Stellingen 1. Halorespiratie is een weinig efficiente wijze van ademhalen. Dit proefschrift 2. Halorespiratie moet worden opgevat als verbreding en niet als specialisatie van het genus Desulfitobacterium. Dit proefschrift 3. Reductieve dehalogenases zijn geen nieuwe enzymen. 4. 16S-rRNA probes zijn minder geschikt voor het aantonen van specifieke metabole activiteiten in een complex ecosysteem. Loffler etal. (2000) AEM66 : 1369;Gottscha l &Kroonema n (2000)Bode m3 : 102 5. Het "twin-arginine" transportsysteem wordt niet goed genoeg begrepen om op basis van het voorkomen van het "twin-arginine" motief enzymen te lokaliseren. Berks etal. (2000)Mol .Microbiol .35 : 260 6. Asbesthoudende bodem is niet verontreinigd. 7. Biologische groente is een pleonasme. Stellingen behorende bij het proefschrift 'Biochemistry and physiology of halorespiration by Desulfitobacterium dehalogenans' van Bram A. van de Pas Wageningen, 6 december 2000 MJOQ^O \lZ°]0 ^ Biochemistry and Physiology of Halorespiration by Desulfitobacterium dehalogenans BramA. van de Pas Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor op gezag van derecto r magnificus van Wageningen Universiteit, dr. ir. L. Speelman, in het openbaar
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Protocol for Evaluating Natural Attenuation of Chlorinated
    United States Office of Research and EPA/600/R-98/128 Environmental Protection Development September 1998 Agency Washington DC 20460 Technical Protocol for Evaluating Natural Attenuation of Chlorinated Solvents in Ground Water TECHNICAL PROTOCOL FOR EVALUATING NATURAL ATTENUATION OF CHLORINATED SOLVENTS IN GROUND WATER by Todd H. Wiedemeier Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. Pasadena, California Matthew A. Swanson, David E. Moutoux, and E. Kinzie Gordon Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. Denver, Colorado John T. Wilson, Barbara H. Wilson, and Donald H. Kampbell United States Environmental Protection Agency National Risk Management Research Laboratory Subsurface Protection and Remediation Division Ada, Oklahoma Patrick E. Haas, Ross N. Miller and Jerry E. Hansen Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence Technology Transfer Division Brooks Air Force Base, Texas Francis H. Chapelle United States Geological Survey Columbia, South Carolina IAG #RW57936164 Project Officer John T. Wilson National Risk Management Research Laboratory Subsurface Protection and Remediation Division Ada, Oklahoma NATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT RESEARCH LABORATORY OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY CINCINNATI, OHIO 45268 i NOTICE The information in this document was developed through a collaboration between the U.S. EPA (Subsurface Protection and Remediation Division, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Center, Ada, Oklahoma [SPRD]) and the U.S. Air Force (U.S. Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas [AFCEE]). EPA staff were primarily responsible for development of the conceptual framework for the approach presented in this document; staff of the U.S. Air Force and their contractors also provided substantive input. The U.S. Air Force was primarily responsible for field testing the approach presented in this document.
    [Show full text]