DOCSLIB.ORG

Protocol for in Situ Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents Using Edible Oil

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FINAL Protocol forIn Situ Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents Using Edible Oil FINAL PROTOCOL FOR IN SITU BIOREMEDIATION OF CHLORINATED SOLVENTS USING EDIBLE OIL October 2007 Prepared for: Air Force Center for Engineering and the Environmental Environmental Science Division Technology Transfer Outreach Office ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This protocol was prepared by Solutions IES, Inc. (Solutions IES), Terra Systems, Inc. (TSI), and Parsons Infrastructure & Technology Group, Inc. (Parsons) under contract to the Air Force Center for Engineering and the Environmental (AFCEE). This document is intended to assist AFCEE and their United States Department of Defense (DoD) technology-transition partners in evaluating and applying edible oil and edible oil emulsions as a long-lasting organic substrate to enhance the in situ anaerobic bioremediation of chlorinated solvents in groundwater. The authors acknowledge the assistance of numerous individuals who provided management, oversight, and review services. These individuals and their affiliations are listed in Appendix A. DISCLAIMER This protocol is a work prepared for the Technology Transfer Outreach Office of the United States Air Force Center for Engineering and the Environmental (AFCEE) by Solutions-IES, Inc. Terra Systems, Inc., Parsons Infrastructure & Technology Group, Inc., and representatives from AFCEE. In no event shall either the United States Government, Solutions-IES, Inc., Terra Systems, Inc., or Parsons Infrastructure & Technology Group, Inc. have any responsibility or liability for any consequences of any use, misuse, inability to use, or reliance upon the information contained herein; nor does these entities warrant or otherwise represent in any way the accuracy, adequacy, efficacy, or applicability of the contents hereof. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION 1 - USING THE EDIBLE OIL PROCESS.....................................................1-1 1.1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Intended Use of this Document ............................................................................1-2 1.3 Following the Edible Oil Process.........................................................................1-3 1.4 Defining Remedial Objectives .............................................................................1-4 1.5 Enhanced Anaerobic Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents............................1-6 1.6 Overview of the Edible Oil Process ...................................................................1-14 1.6.1 Treatment System Configurations..........................................................1-15 1.6.1.1 Source Areas..........................................................................1-16 1.6.1.2 Permeable Biobarriers...........................................................1-16 1.6.2 Edible Oil................................................................................................1-16 1.6.3 Application Methods..............................................................................1-18 1.6.3.1 Pure Edible Oil......................................................................1-18 1.6.3.2 Oil-in-Water Emulsions.........................................................1-19 1.6.4 Design and Implementation of Edible Oil Applications ........................1-21 SECTION 2 - PRELIMINARY SCREENING ................................................................2-1 2.1 Road Map for Preliminary Screening...................................................................2-1 2.2 Site Screening Considerations..............................................................................2-3 2.3 Site Conditions Suitable for Edible Oil Applications...........................................2-5 2.3.1 Potential for Reductive Dechlorination....................................................2-6 2.3.1.1 Types of Groundwater Environments......................................2-6 2.3.1.2 Assessing the Potential for Reductive Dechlorination ............2-6 2.3.1.3 Potential for Biogeochemical Reduction.................................2-8 2.3.2 Source Area and Plume Size ....................................................................2-9 2.3.3 Depth to Groundwater ..............................................................................2-9 2.3.4 Heterogeneity and Hydraulic Conductivity............................................2-10 2.3.5 Groundwater Flow..................................................................................2-10 2.3.6 Competing Electron Acceptors...............................................................2-11 2.3.7 pH and Alkalinity ...................................................................................2-12 2.4 Proceeding with the Edible Oil Process .............................................................2-12 SECTION 3 - PILOT TEST PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION, AND MONITORING .......................................................................................3-1 3.1 Defining Pilot Test Objectives .............................................................................3-1 3.2 Development of a Site-Specific Test Plan............................................................3-2 3.3 Pilot Test Configurations......................................................................................3-3 3.3.1 Single Well Push-Pull Injection Tests......................................................3-4 3.3.1.1 Single-Stage Push-Pull Test ....................................................3-4 3.3.1.2 Two-Stage Push-Pull Test .......................................................3-6 -i- TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page 3.3.2 Multi-Well Injection Tests .......................................................................3-7 3.4 Monitoring During the Injection Process .............................................................3-7 3.4.1 Radius of Influence Evaluation ................................................................3-8 3.4.1.1 Water Soluble Groundwater Tracers .......................................3-8 3.4.1.2 Oil Soluble Tracers..................................................................3-9 3.4.1.3 Soil Analysis for Determining Substrate Distribution...........3-10 3.4.2 Effect of Oil Injection on Formation Permeability.................................3-10 3.5 Monitoring Networks.........................................................................................3-10 3.5.1 Number and Location of Monitoring Points ..........................................3-11 3.5.2 Analysis of Substrate Distribution..........................................................3-13 3.5.3 Monitoring Frequency............................................................................3-14 3.6 Performance Monitoring Protocols....................................................................3-14 3.6.1 Contaminants and Dechlorination Products ...........................................3-15 3.6.2 Biogeochemistry.....................................................................................3-15 3.6.3 Indicators of Organic Carbon .................................................................3-15 3.6.4 Microbiological Characterization...........................................................3-16 3.6.5 Soil Characterization..............................................................................3-18 3.6.6 Soil Gas..................................................................................................3-19 3.6.7 Downgradient Water Quality .................................................................3-19 3.7 Proceeding to Full-Scale Application.................................................................3-19 SECTION 4 - DESIGN OF FULL-SCALE EDIBLE OIL APPLICATIONS.................4-1 4.1 Remedial Objectives and Edible Oil Configurations ...........................................4-1 4.1.1 Remedial Objectives.................................................................................4-1 4.1.2 Treatment System Configurations............................................................4-2 4.1.2.1 Source Areas............................................................................4-2 4.1.2.2 Permeable Biobarriers for Plume Treatment ...........................4-3 4.2 General Design Parameters ..................................................................................4-4 4.2.1 Treatment Zone Dimensions ....................................................................4-4 4.2.2 Amount of Oil Required for Effective Treatment ....................................4-6 4.2.2.1 Site Hydrogeology and Volume of Water to be Treated .........4-6 4.2.2.2 System Design Life..................................................................4-7 4.2.2.3 Hydrogen Demand...................................................................4-8 4.2.2.4 Additional Hydrogen Demands and Organic Carbon Released Downgradient.........................................................4-10 4.2.2.5 Oil Retention within the Aquifer Matrix ...............................4-10 4.2.2.6 Chlorinated Solvent Partitioning into Oil..............................4-11 4.2.2.7 Summary – How Much Oil Do You Need?...........................4-13 4.2.3 Amendments...........................................................................................4-13 4.2.4 Source of Make-up Water or Chase Water.............................................4-15 4.2.5 Dilution or Chase Water Volumes .........................................................4-15
Recommended publications
  • Hydrophilic Surface-Treating Aqueous Solution and Hydrophilic Surface

    Hydrophilic Surface-Treating Aqueous Solution and Hydrophilic Surface

    Europaisches Patentamt (19) European Patent Office Office europeenpeen des brevets EP 0 654 514 B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION (45) Date of publication and mention (51) intci.6: C09D 201/00, C09D 177/04, of the grant of the patent: C09D 5/08, C23C 22/68, 09.12.1998 Bulletin 1998/50 C23C 22/66 (21) Application number: 94307102.7 (22) Date of filing: 28.09.1994 (54) Hydrophilic surface-treating aqueous solution and hydrophilic surface-treating method Hydrophile wassrige Oberflachenbehandlungslosung und hydrophiles Oberflachenbehandlungsverfahren Solution aqueuse hydrophile de traitement de surface, et methode de traitement de surface (84) Designated Contracting States: • Hirasawa, Hidekimi DE FR GB Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa (JP) • Yamasoe, Katsuyoshi (30) Priority: 06.10.1993 JP 250314/93 Yotsukaido-shi, Chiba (JP) (43) Date of publication of application: (74) Representative: Stuart, Ian Alexander et al 24.05.1995 Bulletin 1995/21 MEWBURN ELLIS York House (73) Proprietor: Nippon Paint Co., Ltd. 23 Kingsway Kita-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka 531 (JP) London WC2B 6HP (GB) (72) Inventors: (56) References cited: • Matsukawa, Masahiko EP-A- 0 413 260 US-A-4 828 616 Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa (JP) US-A- 4 908 075 US-A- 4 973 359 • Mikami, Fujio Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa (JP) DO ^> lo ^- LO CO Note: Within nine months from the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent, any person may give notice the Patent Office of the Notice of shall be filed in o to European opposition to European patent granted. opposition a written reasoned statement. It shall not be deemed to have been filed until the opposition fee has been paid.
  • (CCC)95-Hydrophile-Lipophile Balance (HLB) Relationship

    (CCC)95-Hydrophile-Lipophile Balance (HLB) Relationship

    Minerals 2012, 2, 208-227; doi:10.3390/min2030208 OPEN ACCESS minerals ISSN 2075-163X www.mdpi.com/journal/minerals Article Characterizing Frothers through Critical Coalescence Concentration (CCC)95-Hydrophile-Lipophile Balance (HLB) Relationship Wei Zhang 1, Jan E. Nesset 2, Ramachandra Rao 1 and James A. Finch 1,* 1 Department of Mining and Materials Engineering, McGill University, 3610 Univeristy Street, Wong Building, Montreal, QC H3A 2B2, Canada; E-Mails: [email protected] (W.Z.); [email protected] (R.R.) 2 NesseTech Consulting Services Inc., 17-35 Sculler’s Way, St., Catharines, ON L2N 7S9, Canada; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +01-514-398-1452; Fax: +01-514-398-4492. Received: 22 June 2012; in revised form: 26 July 2012 / Accepted: 31 July 2012 / Published: 13 August 2012 Abstract: Frothers are surfactants commonly used to reduce bubble size in mineral flotation. This paper describes a methodology to characterize frothers by relating impact on bubble size reduction represented by CCC (critical coalescence concentration) to frother structure represented by HLB (hydrophile-lipophile balance). Thirty-six surfactants were tested from three frother families: Aliphatic Alcohols, Polypropylene Glycol Alkyl Ethers and Polypropylene Glycols, covering a range in alkyl groups (represented by n, the number of carbon atoms) and number of Propylene Oxide groups (represented by m). The Sauter 3 mean size (D32) was derived from bubble size distribution measured in a 0.8 m mechanical flotation cell. The D32 vs. concentration data were fitted to a 3-parameter model to determine CCC95, the concentration giving 95% reduction in bubble size compared to water only.
  • Chlorinated Solvent Bioremediation: Fundamentals and Practical Application for Remedial Project Managers Presented By: Christopher Marks, Ph.D

    Chlorinated Solvent Bioremediation: Fundamentals and Practical Application for Remedial Project Managers Presented By: Christopher Marks, Ph.D

    Chlorinated Solvent Bioremediation: Fundamentals and Practical Application for Remedial Project Managers Presented by: Christopher Marks, Ph.D. & Carolyn Acheson, Ph.D. US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development National Risk Management Research Laboratory CLU-IN Webinar Nov. 14, 2018 Source: Accelerated Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents, Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council and Remediation and Technology Development Forum, 2003 1 Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents Source: Accelerated Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents, Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council and Remediation and Technology 2 Development Forum, 2003 Part I: Introduction to Chlorinated Solvent Properties and Anaerobic Reductive Dechlorination 3 Terminology • Anaerobic: Microbial metabolic processes occurring in the absence of oxygen. • Anaerobic Reductive Dechlorination: The biological removal of a chlorine atom from an organic compound and replacement with a hydrogen atom in a reducing environment. • Biodegradation aka biotransformation: Biologically mediated reactions which convert one chemical to another. For example, PCE is converted to TCE when anaerobic reductive reactions remove a chlorine molecule. • Bioremediation: The engineered approaches using microorganisms to biodegrade contaminants. • Biostimulation: The addition of organic electron donors and nutrients to enhance the rate of reductive dechlorination by the native microflora. • Bioaugmentation: The addition of beneficial microorganisms to enhance the capacity
  • Overview of in Situ Bioremediation of Chlorinated Ethene DNAPL Source Zones

    Overview of in Situ Bioremediation of Chlorinated Ethene DNAPL Source Zones

    INTERSTATE TECHNOLOGY & REGULATORY COUNCIL Warning! This document has not been amended since publication. Some content may be out of date and may no longer apply. INTERSTATE TECHNOLOGY & REGULATORY COUNCIL Technology Overview Overview of In Situ Bioremediation of Chlorinated Ethene DNAPL Source Zones October 2005 Prepared by The Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council Bioremediation of DNAPLs Team ABOUT ITRC Established in 1995, the Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council (ITRC) is a state-led, national coalition of personnel from the environmental regulatory agencies of more than 40 states and the District of Columbia, three federal agencies, tribes, and public and industry stakeholders. The organization is devoted to reducing barriers to and speeding interstate deployment of, better, more cost-effective, innovative environmental techniques. ITRC operates as a committee of the Environmental Research Institute of the States (ERIS), a Section 501(c)(3) public charity that supports the Environmental Council of the States (ECOS) through its educational and research activities aimed at improving the environment in the United States and providing a forum for state environmental policy makers. More information about ITRC and its available products and services can be found on the Internet at www.itrcweb.org. DISCLAIMER This document is designed to help regulators and others develop a consistent approach to their evaluation, regulatory approval, and deployment of specific technologies at specific sites. Although the information in this document is believed to be reliable and accurate, this document and all material set forth herein are provided without warranties of any kind, either express or implied, including but not limited to warranties of the accuracy or completeness of information contained in the document.
  • Physicochemical Properties and the Gelation Process of Supramolecular Hydrogels: a Review

    Physicochemical Properties and the Gelation Process of Supramolecular Hydrogels: a Review

    gels Review Physicochemical Properties and the Gelation Process of Supramolecular Hydrogels: A Review Abdalla H. Karoyo and Lee D. Wilson * Department of Chemistry, University of Saskatchewan, 110 Science Place, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5C9, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-306-966-2961 Academic Editor: Clemens K. Weiss Received: 10 November 2016; Accepted: 2 December 2016; Published: 1 January 2017 Abstract: Supramolecular polysaccharide-based hydrogels have attracted considerable research interest recently due to their high structural functionality, low toxicity, and potential applications in foods, cosmetics, catalysis, drug delivery, tissue engineering and the environment. Modulation of the stability of hydrogels is of paramount importance, especially in the case of stimuli-responsive systems. This review will update the recent progress related to the rational design of supramolecular hydrogels with the objective of understanding the gelation process and improving their physical gelation properties for tailored applications. Emphasis will be given to supramolecular host–guest systems with reference to conventional gels in describing general aspects of gel formation. A brief account of the structural characterization of various supramolecular hydrogels is also provided in order to gain a better understanding of the design of such materials relevant to the nature of the intermolecular interactions, thermodynamic properties of the gelation process, and the critical concentration values of the precursors and the solvent components. This mini-review contributes to greater knowledge of the rational design of supramolecular hydrogels with tailored applications in diverse fields ranging from the environment to biomedicine. Keywords: gel; sol; aggregation; cyclodextrin; hydration 1. Introduction Polymer gels are generally defined as 3D networks swollen by a large amount of water [1].
  • T8532 Storage Temperature 25°C

    T8532 Storage Temperature 25°C

    TRITON X-100 Product Number X-100, T9284, T8787, T8532 Storage Temperature 25°C CAS #: 9002-93-1 reported in numerous references. It does absorb in the Synonyms: X-100; TRITON X-1001; Octylphenol ultraviolet region of the spectrum, so it can interfere 1 ethylene oxide condensate with protein quantitation by absorption at A280nm. A number of polymeric resins have been used to remove Product Description X-100 from solution, including Amberlite hydrophobic XAD resins6 and Rezorian A161 cartridges.3 The "Triton X" series of detergents are produced from CH3 CH3 octylphenol polymerized with ethylene oxide. The number ("-100") relates only indirectly to the number of H3C C CH2 C (OCH2CH2)xOH ethylene oxide units in the structure. X-100 has an CH CH "average of 9.5" ethylene oxide units per molecule, with 3 3 an average molecular weight of 625.1,3 In addition, lower and higher mole adducts will be present in lesser amounts, varying slightly within supplier's standard manufacturing conditions. A by-product formed during x = 9-10 the reaction is polyethylene glycol, a homopolymer of Appearance: Liquid, clear to slightly hazy, colorless to ethylene oxide. Acid is also added to the product to light yellow neutralize the product after the base catalyzed reaction Specific gravity: 1.065 at 25°C (approx. 1.07 g/mL)1 is completed. No antioxidants are added by Sigma or Approximate Molecular Weight: 6251; the manufacturer, but commercial preparations of Triton 1 X-100 have been found to contain peroxides up to effective molarity =1.7 M for the neat liquid.
  • European Patent Specification

    European Patent Specification

    (19) TZZ ¥_T (11) EP 2 629 763 B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION (45) Date of publication and mention (51) Int Cl.: of the grant of the patent: A61K 9/00 (2006.01) A61Q 17/04 (2006.01) 06.12.2017 Bulletin 2017/49 A61K 8/49 (2006.01) A61K 31/353 (2006.01) (21) Application number: 11788238.1 (86) International application number: PCT/US2011/001802 (22) Date of filing: 24.10.2011 (87) International publication number: WO 2012/054090 (26.04.2012 Gazette 2012/17) (54) METHODS OF INCREASING SOLUBILITY OF POORLY SOLUBLE COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING FORMULATIONS OF SUCH COMPOUNDS VERFAHREN ZUR ERHÖHUNG DER LÖSLICHKEIT VON SCHWER LÖSLICHEN VERBINDUNGEN UND VERFAHREN ZUR HERSTELLUNG VON FORMULIERUNGEN DERARTIGER VERBINDUNGEN PROCÉDÉS VISANT À ACCROÎTRE LA SOLUBILITÉ DE COMPOSÉS FAIBLEMENT SOLUBLES, ET PROCÉDÉS DE FABRICATION ET D’UTILISATION DE FORMULATIONS DE TELS COMPOSÉS (84) Designated Contracting States: (74) Representative: Stafford, Jonathan Alan Lewis et AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB al GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO Marks & Clerk LLP PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR 1 New York Street Manchester M1 4HD (GB) (30) Priority: 22.10.2010 PCT/US2010/002821 22.04.2011 US 201113064882 (56) References cited: EP-A1- 1 600 143 EP-A1- 1 731 134 (43) Date of publication of application: WO-A2-2007/006497 WO-A2-2010/007252 28.08.2013 Bulletin 2013/35 DE-A1- 10 129 973 DE-A1- 10 260 872 US-A- 4 603 046 (60) Divisional application: 17199056.7 • RODRIGUEZ-TENREIRO ET AL: "Estradiol sustained release from high affinity cyclodextrin (73) Proprietor: Vizuri Health Sciences LLC hydrogels", EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF Fairfax, VA 22033 (US) PHARMACEUTICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, ELSEVIER SCIENCE PUBLISHERS B.V., (72) Inventor: BIRBARA, Philip, J.
  • Studies on Surfactants, Cosurfactants, and Oils for Prospective Use in Formulation of Ketorolac Tromethamine Ophthalmic Nanoemulsions

    Studies on Surfactants, Cosurfactants, and Oils for Prospective Use in Formulation of Ketorolac Tromethamine Ophthalmic Nanoemulsions

    pharmaceutics Article Studies on Surfactants, Cosurfactants, and Oils for Prospective Use in Formulation of Ketorolac Tromethamine Ophthalmic Nanoemulsions Shahla S. Smail 1,2,* , Mowafaq M. Ghareeb 3, Huner K. Omer 2 , Ali A. Al-Kinani 1,* and Raid G. Alany 1,4 1 Drug Discovery, Delivery and Patient Care (DDDPC) Theme, Department of Pharmacy, Kingston University, Kingston upon Thames, London KT1 2EE, UK; [email protected] 2 Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Hawler Medical University, Kurdistan Region, Erbil 44001, Iraq; [email protected] 3 Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Baghdad, Baghdad 10011, Iraq; [email protected] 4 School of Pharmacy, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand * Correspondence: [email protected] (S.S.S.); [email protected] (A.A.A.-K.) Abstract: Nanoemulsions (NE) are isotropic, dispersions of oil, water, surfactant(s) and cosurfac- tant(s). A range of components (11 surfactants, nine cosurfactants, and five oils) were investigated as potential excipients for preparation of ketorolac tromethamine (KT) ocular nanoemulsion. Diol cosur- factants were investigated for the effect of their carbon chain length and dielectric constant (DEC), Log P, and HLB on saturation solubility of KT. Hen’s Egg Test—ChorioAllantoic Membrane (HET-CAM) assay was used to evaluate conjunctival irritation of selected excipients. Of the investigated surfac- Citation: Smail, S.S.; Ghareeb, M.M.; Omer, H.K.; Al-Kinani, A.A.; Alany, tants, Tween 60 achieved the highest KT solubility (9.89 ± 0.17 mg/mL), followed by Cremophor RH R.G. Studies on Surfactants, 40 (9.00 ± 0.21 mg/mL); amongst cosurfactants of interest ethylene glycol yielded the highest KT Cosurfactants, and Oils for solubility (36.84 ± 0.40 mg/mL), followed by propylene glycol (26.23 ± 0.82 mg/mL).
  • Considerations for the Collection and Evaluation of Natural Attenuation Parameters at Sites Contaminated with Chlorinated Solvents

    Considerations for the Collection and Evaluation of Natural Attenuation Parameters at Sites Contaminated with Chlorinated Solvents

    CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE COLLECTION AND EVALUATION OF NATURAL ATTENUATION PARAMETERS AT SITES CONTAMINATED WITH CHLORINATED SOLVENTS Chlorine • Hydrogen • Carbon • Bond "\. ( . I Vinyl Chloride I . ~ I Cis-1,2-Dichloroethene I ITrichloroethene I .,. Source Area Biological Active Area DowngradientI Area Filure 3 Anaerobic Reductive Dechlorination ofa Trichloroethene Plnm.e Prepared by Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Division of Waste Management Bureau of Waste Cleanup Hazardous Waste Cleanup Section April 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 1.0 IN'TR.ODUCTION ........................................................................................ 1 ~ 2.0 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF CHLORINATED ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBON BIODEGRADATION................................................. 2 2.1 Bacteria 2.2 Electron Acceptor Reactions 2.3 Electron Donor Reactions 2.4 Co-Metabolism 3.0 NATURAL ATTENUATION BY PHYSICAL PROCESSES ................... 4 4.0 METABOLIC BY-PRODUCTS AND REDOX PROCESSES IN GROUNDWATER SYSTEMS ................................................................... 4 S.O EVIDENCE USED TO SUPPORT NATURAL ATTENUATION•••••••••• S 5.1 Direct Evidence S.2 Examine Changes 5.3 Laboratory microcosm studies 6.0 METHODOLOGY USED FOR DATA REVIEW AND SITE EVALUATION........................................................................................... 6 7.0 NATURAL ATTENUATION SAMPLING AND DATA EVALUATION METHODOLOGY..................................................................................... 9 7.1 Monitor Well
  • PATENT OFFICE 2,159,312 PROCESS for BREAKING OL-N-WATER, TYPE PETROLEUM EMULSIONS Carles M

    PATENT OFFICE 2,159,312 PROCESS for BREAKING OL-N-WATER, TYPE PETROLEUM EMULSIONS Carles M

    Patented May 23, 1939 2,159,312 UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE 2,159,312 PROCESS FOR BREAKING OL-N-WATER, TYPE PETROLEUM EMULSIONS Carles M. Blair, Jr., Webster Groves, Mo., assign or to fhe Tret-O-Lite Company, Webster Groves, Mc., a corporation of Missouri No orawing. Application December 13, 1937, Serial No. 179,471 1. Claims. (CI. 196-4) This invention relates to the treatment of a tive colioid or equivalent thereof. To this extent, certain peculiar kind of naturally occurring crude although not necessarily due to this factor alone, oil emulsion and has for its main object to provide these particular or peculiar oil field emulsions, a practicable process for separating the water ianiely, the naturally occurring oil-in-water ... and oil contained in said peculiar emulsion. emulsions having a significant proportion of dis 5 The vast majority of petroleum emulsions are of persed phase and a substantially complete absence the Water-in-oil type and comprise fine droplets Of a protective colloid or equivalent substance of naturally occurring waters or brines dispersed appear to be substantially a new type of emulsion in a more or less permanent state throughout the that requires a new method of treatment, in 10. oil, which constitutes the continuous phase of the order to separate them economically and rapidly O emulsion. They are obtained from producing into their component parts, and thus permit the wells and from the botton of oil storage tanks, recovery of dry or merchantable oil, and are commonly referred to as "cut oil', 'roily It is to be emphasized that the external phase oil', 'emulsified oil', and 'bottom settlings'.
  • Principles and Practices of Enhanced Anaerobic Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents

    Principles and Practices of Enhanced Anaerobic Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents

    FINAL Principles and Practices of Enhanced Anaerobic Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents August 2004 This page intentionally left blank PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES OF ENHANCED ANAEROBIC BIOREMEDIATION OF CHLORINATED SOLVENTS August 2004 Prepared for: Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence Brooks City-Base, Texas Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center Port Hueneme, California and Environmental Security Technology Certification Program Arlington, Virginia This page intentionally left blank ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Parsons Corporation (Parsons) prepared this Principles and Practices document under contract to the Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence (AFCEE, Contract F41624-00- D-8024) and the Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center (NFESC, Contract N47408-98- D-7527). The NFESC contract was funded by the Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP). The United States Army Corp of Engineers (USACE) assisted with technical review. This document is intended to assist AFCEE, NFESC, ESTCP, USACE and their United States (US) Department of Defense (DoD) technology-transition partners in evaluating and applying enhanced in situ anaerobic bioremediation for restoration of groundwater contaminated with chlorinated solvents. The authors acknowledge the assistance of numerous individuals who provided review services, and to several environmental contractors that provided case studies and information regarding respective areas of expertise. These individuals and their affiliations are listed in Appendix A. - i - 022/738863/28.doc DISCLAIMER In no event shall either the United States Government or Parsons have any responsibility or liability for any consequences of any use, misuse, inability to use, or reliance on the information contained herein; nor does either warrant or otherwise represent in any way the accuracy, adequacy, efficacy, or applicability of the contents hereof.
  • Biochemistry and Physiology of Halorespiration by Desulfitobacterium Dehalogenans

    Biochemistry and Physiology of Halorespiration by Desulfitobacterium Dehalogenans

    Biochemistry and Physiology of Halorespiration by Desulfitobacterium dehalogenans ..?.^TJ?*LE_ LANDBOUWCATALOGU S 0000 0807 1728 Promotor: Dr.W.M . deVo s hoogleraar in de microbiologie Co-promotoren: Dr.ir .A.J.M .Stam s universitair hoofddocent bij deleerstoelgroe p Microbiologie Dr.ir . G. Schraa universitair docent bij deleerstoelgroe p Microbiologie Stellingen 1. Halorespiratie is een weinig efficiente wijze van ademhalen. Dit proefschrift 2. Halorespiratie moet worden opgevat als verbreding en niet als specialisatie van het genus Desulfitobacterium. Dit proefschrift 3. Reductieve dehalogenases zijn geen nieuwe enzymen. 4. 16S-rRNA probes zijn minder geschikt voor het aantonen van specifieke metabole activiteiten in een complex ecosysteem. Loffler etal. (2000) AEM66 : 1369;Gottscha l &Kroonema n (2000)Bode m3 : 102 5. Het "twin-arginine" transportsysteem wordt niet goed genoeg begrepen om op basis van het voorkomen van het "twin-arginine" motief enzymen te lokaliseren. Berks etal. (2000)Mol .Microbiol .35 : 260 6. Asbesthoudende bodem is niet verontreinigd. 7. Biologische groente is een pleonasme. Stellingen behorende bij het proefschrift 'Biochemistry and physiology of halorespiration by Desulfitobacterium dehalogenans' van Bram A. van de Pas Wageningen, 6 december 2000 MJOQ^O \lZ°]0 ^ Biochemistry and Physiology of Halorespiration by Desulfitobacterium dehalogenans BramA. van de Pas Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor op gezag van derecto r magnificus van Wageningen Universiteit, dr. ir. L. Speelman, in het openbaar