DOCSLIB.ORG

Counter Terrorist Trends and Analysis Volume 5, Issue 4 April 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Counter Terrorist Trends and Analysis Volume 5, Issue 4 April 2013 Terrorist Rehabilitation and Community Engagement: New Frontiers in Combating Terrorism ROHAN GUNARATNA Reconciliation in Afghanistan: The Pakistani Factor HALIMULLAH KOUSARY Bangladesh in the Run-up to Elections: Walking a Tightrope? IFTEKHARUL BASHAR Peace Talks with the Pakistani Taliban: Challenges and Prospects ARSHAD ALI The Expansion of Sectarian Conflict in Pakistan ABDUL BASIT Drifting Apart? Indo-Lanka Relations Examined MANOJ HARJANI INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR POLITICAL VIOLENCE AND TERRORISM RESEARCH S. RAJARATNAM SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES A Graduate School of Nanyang Technological University 2 Terrorist Rehabilitation and Community Engagement: New Frontiers in Combating Terrorism Rohan Gunaratna There is now a greater awareness among governments of the need to invest in creating new terrorist rehabilitation and community engagement programs and in sustaining existing ones. With support from governments, NGOs, community organizations, and the private and academic sectors, terrorist rehabilitation and community engagement programs are likely to double worldwide in the coming decade. The Context of circumstances. Contemporary terrorist groups are adept at harnessing modern communication Most governments continue to fight terrorism platforms to reach out beyond their existing using a “hard” approach involving kinetic and supporters and sympathizers. Enabled by the lethal methods. They use intelligence to detect internet and social media, they not only engage terrorist attacks during planning and preparation, people within the countries they operate in, but law enforcement to investigate and charge also diaspora and migrant communities abroad. terrorists at home, and the military to combat Both terrorist and government activities – terrorism abroad. While the “hard” approach may especially inappropriate responses by be effective, it is not the most efficient approach governments to terrorist events – generate to take. It help governments fight operational sympathy and support for terrorism by polarizing terrorism in the short term, but cannot stem the communities ethnically and religiously. tide of ideological extremism, the precursor of terrorism. The polarization of communities increases their vulnerability to terrorist propaganda, often leading This is because individuals can become to the steady development of mistrust, suspicion radicalized by extremist ideology even in the best and prejudice between them. To prevent terrorist Detainees in Libya undergoing a rehabilitation programme, 2010. Photo credit: ICPVTR Libya Study Visit Team. Counter Terrorist Trends and Analysis, Volume 5, Issue 4, April 2013. Terrorist Rehabilitation and Community Engagement 3 propaganda from radicalizing vulnerable prevention, so that individuals will not embrace communities, governments must therefore invest extremist ideologies that transform them into in community engagement, taking care to focus terrorists; second, rehabilitation for terrorists, and on the very communities that terrorists claim to third, examination of issues exploited by represent. Working together with a range of terrorists so that they can be addressed and the organizations, governments can create platforms terrorist groups’ membership and support base both to counter extremist ideology and promote can be eroded. Governments will also need to moderation. involve the private sector so that programs will have the means to create job opportunities for Furthermore, the criminal justice and prisons rehabilitated inmates and detainees ready for systems in most countries are designed for reintegration back to society. The participation of deterrence and punishment, not prevention and various segments of society would make citizens rehabilitation. Terrorists detained using the “hard” into stakeholders and governments can share the approach can become more radicalized in prison burden of security with those who benefit from it. and use the opportunity to radicalize other prisoners. In this way, the “hard” approach Current Developments undermines itself because prisons then become a breeding ground for new recruits when Terrorist rehabilitation and community hardcore extremists are detained and not engagement are emerging as indispensable tools managed properly by prison authorities. in contemporary counterterrorism practice. Working together with military, law enforcement Detained terrorists have also shown their and intelligence services, governments in several resourcefulness while in prison by writing books countries have built rehabilitation and community and leaflets, cementing their place in terrorist engagement programs that have also involved iconography to earn the status of a hero worthy community partners, NGOs, and the private and of respect and emulation by the next generation the academic sectors. of terrorist recruits. Unless terrorists in custody change their views, they will continue to pose an Rehabilitation programs in Egypt, Algeria, Libya enduring threat to public safety and security both and Yemen are now defunct, and the programs in whilst being in custody and once released. There Iraq, Uzbekistan, Colombia, Spain and Indonesia is thus an urgent need for proper prison are ad-hoc. Structured programs are present in management to prevent ordinary criminals from Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Malaysia and being radicalized and for the implementation of Singapore. There is a need for ad-hoc programs custodial rehabilitation to de-radicalize detainees. to evolve into structured programs and for Custodial rehabilitation must also be followed by structured programs to be sustained in the long community rehabilitation initiatives, where it is term. Some of the more crucial challenges faced paramount for engagement programs to prepare by current rehabilitation programs include the ground for successful reintegration of the monitoring recidivism, managing the transition for rehabilitated beneficiary. detainees ready to be reintegrated back into society, and staying on top of the ever-changing But for this “soft” approach involving terrorist terrorist narratives to counter them effectively rehabilitation and community engagement to be when attempting to de-radicalize detainees. successful, it has to be multifaceted, facilitated by a long term public-private partnership, and led by Community engagement programs have creative and innovative individuals. Investment emerged in varied forms and with different areas must be focused in three key areas. First, of focus. This diversity has proven above all that Counter Terrorist Trends and Analysis, Volume 5, Issue 4, April 2013. Terrorist Rehabilitation and Community Engagement 4 Prime Minister of Singapore, Mr Le e Hsien Loo n g, addressing delegates of the International Conference on Terrorist Rehabilitation and Community Resilience held in Singapore from 26-27 March 2013. Photo credit: ICRR Media Team there is no easily identified common approach challenges rehabilitation and community and that every country looking to formulate a engagement programs will face going forward. community engagement program must develop its own path aided by the best practices identified The partnership between RSIS and RRG which in other programs. Political will to bring began when the latter was formed in April 2003 stakeholders together and provide coordination to can serve as a model for other countries to build community engagement efforts has been a key on. Encompassing collaboration in research and challenge facing many countries. However, there publication and building of networks both within are encouraging signs with initiatives being made and outside Singapore, the RSIS-RRG by countries with functioning engagement partnership has been able to make a significant programs to share their experiences and contribution to the realm of counter-ideology and cooperate with other countries on seeding new promotion of moderation. programs where they are most needed. In the coming decade, governments and their In fact, a call to establish rehabilitation and partners should look to dismantle the conceptual community engagement programs worldwide infrastructure of terrorists in parallel with their received overwhelming support at the two-day work towards reducing the immediate threat International Conference on Terrorist stemming from terrorists’ operational Rehabilitation and Community Resilience (ICRR) infrastructure. Such an effort will require a in Singapore on 26-27 March 2013. Organized by concerted strategy at both the community level the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies and in detainee and prison settings. It will involve (RSIS) and Religious Rehabilitation Group diverse partnerships creating robust community (RRG), the conference was inaugurated by the engagement programs to counter extremist Prime Minister of Singapore, Mr. Lee Hsien ideology upstream and rehabilitation programs to Loong. Around 500 delegates from 24 countries de-radicalize terrorists and extremists participated, including both practitioners and downstream. scholars. The conference marked a decade of —— RRG’s success in providing religious counseling Rohan Gunaratna is Head, ICPVTR for Singapore’s Jemaah Islamiyah detainees and and Professor of Security Studies at featured panels that looked at where global the S. Rajaratnam School of International counterterrorism efforts stood today and the Studies. Counter Terrorist Trends and Analysis, Volume 5, Issue 4, April 2013.
Recommended publications
  • Constructing” the Jemaah Islamiyah Terrorist: a Preliminary Inquiry

    Constructing” the Jemaah Islamiyah Terrorist: a Preliminary Inquiry

    No. 71 “CONSTRUCTING” THE JEMAAH ISLAMIYAH TERRORIST: A PRELIMINARY INQUIRY Kumar Ramakrishna Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies Singapore OCTOBER 2004 With Compliments This Working Paper series presents papers in a preliminary form and serves to stimulate comment and discussion. The views expressed are entirely the author’s own and not that of the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies The Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS) was established in July 1996 as an autonomous research institute within the Nanyang Technological University. Its objectives are to: • Conduct research on security, strategic and international issues. • Provide general and graduate education in strategic studies, international relations, defence management and defence technology. • Promote joint and exchange programmes with similar regional and international institutions; organise seminars/conferences on topics salient to the strategic and policy communities of the Asia-Pacific. Research Through its Working Paper Series, IDSS Commentaries and other publications, the Institute seeks to share its research findings with the strategic studies and defence policy communities. The Institute’s researchers are also encouraged to publish their writings in refereed journals. The focus of research is on issues relating to the security and stability of the Asia-Pacific region and their implications for Singapore and other countries in the region. The Institute has also established the S. Rajaratnam Professorship in Strategic Studies (named after Singapore’s first Foreign Minister), to bring distinguished scholars to participate in the work of the Institute. Previous holders of the Chair include Professors Stephen Walt (Harvard University), Jack Snyder (Columbia University), Wang Jisi (Chinese Academy of Social Sciences) and Alastair Iain Johnston (Harvard University).
  • The War on Terror and the Future of Indonesian Democracy

    The War on Terror and the Future of Indonesian Democracy

    This document is downloaded from DR‑NTU (https://dr.ntu.edu.sg) Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. The war on terror and the future of Indonesian democracy Tatik S. Hafidz. 2003 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/100095 Nanyang Technological University Downloaded on 26 Sep 2021 18:19:33 SGT ATTENTION: The Singapore Copyright Act applies to the use of this document. Nanyang Technological University Library No. 46 The War On Terror And The Future Of Indonesian Democracy Tatik S. Hafidz Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies Singapore MARCH 2003 With Compliments This Working Paper series presents papers in a preliminary form and serves to stimulate comment and discussion. The views expressed are entirely the author’s own and not that of the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies. ATTENTION: The Singapore Copyright Act applies to the use of this document. Nanyang Technological University Library The Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS) was established in July 1996 as an autonomous research institute within the Nanyang Technological University. Its objectives are to: Conduct research on security, strategic and international issues. Provide general and graduate education in strategic studies, international relations, defence management and defence technology. Promote joint and exchange programmes with similar regional and international institutions; organise seminars/conferences on topics salient to the strategic and policy communities of the Asia-Pacific. Research Through its Working Paper Series, IDSS Commentaries and other publications, the Institute seeks to share its research findings with the strategic studies and defence policy communities. The Institute’s researchers are also encouraged to publish their writings in refereed journals.
  • Jemaah Islamiyah (JI)

    Jemaah Islamiyah (JI)

    Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) Name: Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) Type of Organization: Insurgent non-state actor religious terrorist transnational violent Ideologies and Affiliations: Islamist jihadist Qutbist Salafist Sunni takfiri Place of Origin: Indonesia Year of Origin: 1993 (formal establishment) Founder(s): Abu Bakar Bashir and Abdullah Sungkar Places of Operation: Indonesia (primary operations); Malaysia and Singapore (cells); the Philippines, Cambodia, and Thailand (possible operations) Overview As Known As: • Islamic Organization1 • Jema’a Islamiyyah7 • Jemaa Islamiyah2 • Jemaah Islamiah8 • Jema’a Islamiyah3 • Jemaah Islamiya9 • Jemaa Islamiyya4 • Jema’ah Islamiyah10 • Jema’a Islamiyya5 • Jemaah Islamiyyah11 • Jemaa Islamiyyah6 • Jema’ah Islamiyyah12 Executive Summary: Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) is a jihadist group in Southeast Asia that seeks to establish a caliphate in the region through violent means. The group is led by its co-founder, Abu Bakar Bashir, who pledged loyalty to ISIS in July 2014. JI first raised its global profile after carrying out bombings in Bali in 2002 and 2005, killing 202 and 20 people (mostly foreign tourists), respectively.13 Among other violent operations, JI is known for its links to the 1993 World Trade Center bombing as well as the 1995 failed “Bojinka” plot, an attempt to bomb 12 U.S. commercial airlines in the span of two days.14 JI has links to al- Qaeda and the Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG), a Philippines-based terrorist organization.15 1 Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) Analyst J.M. Berger has stated that JI is defunct.16 Nevertheless, the group remains a threat given its extensive network and ties to both ISIS and the Nusra Front. Australian authorities in particular have expressed concern about JI foreign fighters returning to the region.
  • Radical Islam in Southeast Asia and Its Challenge to U.S

    Radical Islam in Southeast Asia and Its Challenge to U.S

    THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RICE UNIVERSITY RADICAL ISLAM IN SOUTHEAST ASIA AND ITS CHALLENGE TO U.S. POLICY BY FRED R. VON DER MEHDEN PROFESSOR EMERITUS OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, RICE UNIVERSITY OCTOBER 2005 Radical Islam in Southeast Asia and its Challenge to U.S. Policy THESE PAPERS WERE WRITTEN BY A RESEARCHER (OR RESEARCHERS) WHO PARTICIPATED IN A BAKER INSTITUTE RESEARCH PROJECT. WHEREVER FEASIBLE, THESE PAPERS ARE REVIEWED BY OUTSIDE EXPERTS BEFORE THEY ARE RELEASED. HOWEVER, THE RESEARCH AND VIEWS EXPRESSED IN THESE PAPERS ARE THOSE OF THE INDIVIDUAL RESEARCHER(S), AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE VIEWS OF THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY. ©2005 BY THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY OF RICE UNIVERSITY THIS MATERIAL MAY BE QUOTED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION, PROVIDED APPROPRIATE CREDIT IS GIVEN TO THE AUTHOR AND THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY. 2 Radical Islam in Southeast Asia and its Challenge to U.S. Policy INTRODUCTION A generation ago, few knowledgeable observers of the religious and political scene in Southeast Asia would have expected to see articles entitled “Islamic Terrorism in Southeast Asia” or “Jihad Archipelago.” At that time, Islam in Southeast Asia had a greater reputation for pluralism, flexibility, and tolerance than that found in the Middle East. Even today, the picture of a fanatical, rigid, and militant Islam does not characterize the vast majority of Muslims in the region. Compared to earlier years, there is no doubt that today’s Southeast Asian Muslim is more aware of the rest of the Islamic world, practices his religion more faithfully, and senses that Islam is a target of outside forces that want to weaken its place in the world.
  • Jemaah Islamiyah's Publishing Industry

    Jemaah Islamiyah's Publishing Industry

    INDONESIA: JEMAAH ISLAMIYAH’S PUBLISHING INDUSTRY Asia Report N°147 – 28 February 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... i I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1 II. ISLAMIC PUBLISHING............................................................................................... 2 III. THE JI-LINKED COMPANIES................................................................................... 3 A. AL-ALAQ..............................................................................................................................3 B. THE ARAFAH GROUP ............................................................................................................4 C. THE AL-QOWAM GROUP.......................................................................................................5 D. THE AQWAM GROUP.............................................................................................................6 E. KAFAYEH CIPTA MEDIA (KCM)...........................................................................................8 F. OTHER SOLO AREA PUBLISHERS...........................................................................................9 G. AR-RAHMAH MEDIA.............................................................................................................9 IV. THE PUBLISHNG PROCESS...................................................................................
  • The Changing Paradigm of Indonesian Jihadist

    The Changing Paradigm of Indonesian Jihadist

    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by JOURNAL OF INDONESIAN ISLAM THE CHANGING PARADIGM OF INDONESIAN JIHADIST MOVEMENTS From al-`Aduww al-Qarib> to al-`Aduww al-Ba`id> Syaifudin Zuhri UIN Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta - Indonesia Abstract: Like in any other Muslim countries, an analysis of Islamic space in Indonesia cannot ignore the jihadist movements that took shape there. Since the reformation era, Indonesians have witnessed a number of bloody tragedies, ranging from religious conflicts in Ambon, attacks to the Western embassies offices, to the deadliest suicide bombings in Bali. All aforementioned attacks entails that a terrorist group operating in Southeast Asia called Jama’ah Islamiyyah does exist. The article deals with the historical account of the transformation of Indonesian jihadist movements. It will discuss, first, the intellectual roots of the emergence of transnational jihadist movements and, second, the Indonesian’ links to the trend as Jamaah Islamiyyah has demonstrated. The “near enemy” (al-‘aduww al-qarīb) and the “far enemy” (al-‘aduww al-ba‘īd) developed by Greges are key notions quoted as analytical tools to deal with diverse acts of jihadist movement in responde to the local and global parties perceived as anti-Islam. Keywords: Jihadist movement, Jama’ah Islamiyyah, transnational jihadist networks. Introduction Since the collapse of Suharto’s New Order (1966-1998) and along with the political democratisation of the country, Indonesians have witnessed a number of bloody attacks, suicide bombings, and terrorism. It leads to the condemnation and accusation, including from that of the former prime minister of Singapore who maintained that Indonesia is “a nest for terrorists”.
  • Indonesia: Jemaah Islamiyah’S Publishing Industry

    Indonesia: Jemaah Islamiyah’S Publishing Industry

    INDONESIA: JEMAAH ISLAMIYAH’S PUBLISHING INDUSTRY Asia Report N°147 – 28 February 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... i I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1 II. ISLAMIC PUBLISHING............................................................................................... 2 III. THE JI-LINKED COMPANIES................................................................................... 3 A. AL-ALAQ..............................................................................................................................3 B. THE ARAFAH GROUP ............................................................................................................4 C. THE AL-QOWAM GROUP.......................................................................................................5 D. THE AQWAM GROUP.............................................................................................................6 E. KAFAYEH CIPTA MEDIA (KCM)...........................................................................................8 F. OTHER SOLO AREA PUBLISHERS...........................................................................................9 G. AR-RAHMAH MEDIA.............................................................................................................9 IV. THE PUBLISHNG PROCESS...................................................................................
  • GLOBAL JIHAD in SOUTHEAST ASIA Examining the Expansion of the Islamic State and Al-Qaeda

    GLOBAL JIHAD in SOUTHEAST ASIA Examining the Expansion of the Islamic State and Al-Qaeda

    GLOBAL JIHAD IN SOUTHEAST ASIA Examining the expansion of the Islamic State and al-Qaeda Edited by Mona Kanwal Sheikh DIIS · Danish Institute for International Studies The Danish Institute for International Studies is a leading public institute for independent research and analysis of international affairs. We conduct and communicate multidisciplinary research on globalisation, security, development and foreign policy. DIIS aims to use our research results to influence the agenda in research, policy and public debate, and we put great effort into informing policymakers and the public of our results and their possible applications. Defence and Security Studies at DIIS This publication is part of the Defence and Security Studies at DIIS. The aim of these studies is to provide multidisciplinary in-depth knowledge on topics that are central for Danish defence and security policy, both current and long-term. The design and the conclusions of the research under the Defence and Security Studies are entirely independent. Conclusions do not reflect the views of the ministries or any other government agency involved, nor do they constitute an official DIIS position. Additional information about DIIS and our Defence and Security Studies can be found at www.diis.dk GLOBAL JIHAD IN SOUTHEAST ASIA Examining the expansion of the Islamic State and al-Qaeda Mona Kanwal Sheikh Lars Erslev Andersen Nicholas Chan Hara Shintaro This book is published by DIIS as part of the Defence and Security Studies DIIS · Danish Institute for International Studies Østbanegade
  • An In-Depth Look at the Jemaah Islamiyah Network

    An In-Depth Look at the Jemaah Islamiyah Network

    The Fletcher School Online Journal for issues related to Southwest Asia and Islamic Civilization Fall 2004, Article 2 An In‐depth Look at the Jemaah Islamiyah Network Yanina Golburt Seeking to destabilize regional governments Background and cultivate cooperation and sharing of Abdullah Sungkar, co‐founder of the Pondok resources with homegrown terrorist and Ngruki schooling network in Central Java in 1971, separatist groups, the radical Islamist Indonesian established JI in Malaysia in group Jemaah Islamiyah (JI), poses a significant 1995 as an “ideological JI envisions the threat to the United States and its interests. The hybrid” of Darul Islam and 2 founding of an Islamic umbrella terrorist network exploits Southeast Saudi Wahhabism. Asia’s lax security controls to set up front Sungkar found inspiration state, Daulah Islamiyah companies, fundraise, forge documents, and in radical thinkers that Nusantara, which purchase weapons. The predominantly weak promoted literal would include states of the region suffer from limited reach of interpretations of Islam, Malaysia, Indonesia, law enforcement, poor border controls, and such as Hassan al‐Banna, southern Thailand, the underdeveloped financial institutions that founder of the Egyptian southern Philippines combine to provide fertile ground for JI’s growth. Muslim Brotherhood, and Political and logistical difficulties in monitoring Sayyid Qutb, who and Singapore. Islamic charity networks, Islamic banks, and espoused doctrines money‐laundering operations encourage the legitimizing militant Jihad against non‐Islamic growth of the organization through the creation of regimes. JI envisions the founding of an Islamic Al Qaeda syndicates and cooperation with state, Daulah Islamiyah Nusantara, which would organized crime networks. Poverty and include Malaysia, Indonesia, southern Thailand, 3 underdevelopment further encourage terrorist the southern Philippines and Singapore.
  • Briefing Notes 9 February 2015

    Briefing Notes 9 February 2015

    Group 22 - Information Centre Asylum and Migration Briefing Notes 9 February 2015 Afghanistan . Security situation Several security incidents were reported once again last week. Nine police officers were killed in a Taliban attack on a checkpoint in southern Kandahar province (Maiwand district) on 2 February 2015. At least two police officers were killed in a suicide bombing carried out by the Taliban in the provincial capital Lashkar Gah (Helmand, southern Afghanistan) on 3 February 2015. In the neighbouring province of Uruzgan, dozens of insurgents attacked a police checkpoint in Charcheno district, killing four police officers and wounding three. On 5 February 2015, At least 18 militants were killed in a gun battle in Nangarhar in eastern Afghani- stan (Nasjan district close to the border with Pakistan). In addition to these incidents that were covered by the international press, a large number of attacks and bombings were carried out on a daily basis last week; they were only covered in the Afghan press. The provinces hit hardest were Faryab (in the north), Kunar (in the east, where a girl's school and hospital were bombed) and Parwan (central Afghanistan). Cabinet formation Afghanistan's Parliament has only approved the appointment of eight ministers so far, the other 17 members were rejected by the Afghan parliament last week. A decision on new candidates will not be taken until March at the earliest. Rise in the number of voluntary returnees from Pakistan According to the International Organization for Migration, there was a sharp rise in the number of returnees from Pakistan in January 2015.
  • Beyond Viktor Bout: Why the United States Needs an Arms Trade Treaty

    Beyond Viktor Bout: Why the United States Needs an Arms Trade Treaty

    156 Oxfam Briefing Paper 6 October 2011 Beyond Viktor Bout: Why the United States needs an Arms Trade Treaty www.oxfam.org A discarded military tank in Sierra Leone being used to dry washing. During the civil war of 1991–2002, the country was under a UN arms embargo, which arms brokers routinely broke. ©Jane Gibbs/Oxfam While the high profile trial of Viktor Bout in New York will show some of the threats the world continues to face from unscrupulous private arms brokers, it only provides a glimpse into a much larger problem. Skilled at operating in the shadows and exploiting weak national arms transfer controls, arms brokers have funneled arms to almost every country under a UN arms embargoes in the last 15 years, often fueling armed conflict and serious human rights violations. The US has worked on at least 70 US prosecutions in the last five years that have charged defendants with crimes related to illegal arms brokering. Yet, it continues to face difficulties in bringing arms brokers to justice and shutting down criminal networks. The lack of effective legal systems addressing the arms trade in many countries enables illicit arms dealers to exploit regulatory gaps and carry out their activities with impunity. The US and the world need an effective global Arms Trade Treaty to help close these gaps and stop the irresponsible trade in deadly weapons. Summary With the trial of Viktor Bout nearly underway and the UN negotiations on an Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) starting in the summer of 2012, this briefing paper seeks to provide the reader with a deeper understanding of the challenges the US government faces in tackling unscrupulous arms brokers abroad, and to show how the adoption of a strong and comprehensive ATT could help the United States and other governments in such efforts.
  • Mahathir's Islam: Mahathir Mohamad on Religion and Modernity In

    Mahathir's Islam: Mahathir Mohamad on Religion and Modernity In

    University of Hawai'i Manoa Kahualike UH Press Book Previews University of Hawai`i Press Fall 10-1-2018 Mahathir’s Islam: Mahathir Mohamad on Religion and Modernity in Malaysia Sven Schottmann Follow this and additional works at: https://kahualike.manoa.hawaii.edu/uhpbr Part of the Asian History Commons, Islamic Studies Commons, and the Political Theory Commons Recommended Citation Schottmann, Sven, "Mahathir’s Islam: Mahathir Mohamad on Religion and Modernity in Malaysia" (2018). UH Press Book Previews. 15. https://kahualike.manoa.hawaii.edu/uhpbr/15 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Hawai`i Press at Kahualike. It has been accepted for inclusion in UH Press Book Previews by an authorized administrator of Kahualike. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MAHATHIR’S ISLAM MAHATHIR’S ISLAM Mahathir Mohamad on Religion and Modernity in Malaysia Sven Schottmann University of Hawai‘i Press Honolulu © 2018 University of Hawai‘i Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America 23 22 21 20 19 18 6 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Schottmann, Sven, author. Title: Mahathir’s Islam: Mahathir Mohamad on religion and modernity in Malaysia/Sven Schottmann. Description: Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, [2018] | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2018001939 | ISBN 9780824876470 (cloth ; alk. paper) Subjects: LCSH: Mahathir bin Mohamad, 1925—Religion. | Mahathir bin Mohamad, 1925—Political and social views. | Islam and state—Malaysia. | Malaysia—Politics and government. Classification: LCC DS597.215.M34 S36 2018 | DDC 959.505/4092—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2018001939 University of Hawai‘i Press books are printed on acid-free paper and meet the guidelines for permanence and durability of the Council on Library Resources.