From ADAS to Automated Driving Technical Session Schedule As of 10/15/2018 07:42 Pm

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

From ADAS to Automated Driving Technical Session Schedule As of 10/15/2018 07:42 Pm From ADAS to Automated Driving Technical Session Schedule As of 10/15/2018 07:42 pm Tuesday, October 9 Day 1 Session Code: ADAS100 Room 360 Session Time: ALL DAY Market Analysis and Outlook, Deployment Strategies, Safety Time Paper No. Title 9:00 a.m. ORAL ONLY Welcome and Introductions Tim A. Cavanaugh, SAE International 9:05 a.m. ORAL ONLY Keynote Presentation: Connected Automation: Vision, Planning and Initiatives at MDOT Kirk Steudle, Secretary, Michigan Dept. of Transportation 10:00 a.m. ORAL ONLY ADAS to Autonomy, a Means to an End? Car makers are scrambling to deploy safety systems and build the algorithms that will replace human driving. It’s time to assess the progress and reconsider the objective. Will autonomy be a feature, a service or an entirely new form of transportation? We’ll look at the promises, the projections and the data. Roger Lanctot, Strategy Analytics Inc. 10:30 a.m. Networking Break 11:00 a.m. ORAL ONLY Vehicle Communications (V2X) <p>Vehicle to location services using satellite and cellular networks such as OnStar have been on vehicles since 1996. </p> <p>Vehicle to Vehicle (V2V) communication is appearing on production vehicles. Investigative studies, test fleets and technical specifications have concentrated on Dedicated Shortrange Radio Communication (DSRC) technology at 5.9 GHz. A newcomer, funded by the telecom industry, is 5G cellular technology.</p> V2X Communication can provide over 100 immediate safety benefits (traffic congestion, early warning braking, construction zones, emergency vehicle and intersection safety). One of the enabling technologies for autonomous vehicles is V2X communication. Bob’s multimedia presentation will provide an overview of the technologies. Robert L. Neff, Intrass 11:30 a.m. ORAL ONLY Current Simulation Shortcomings and How Revolutionary Solutions Will Make AVs a Reality The pursuit of autonomy is completely changing how vehicles are designed, developed and especially tested – in most cases, before official regulation or industry standards exist. Autonomous system software is overwhelmingly complex and constantly evolving, and the development pace and maintenance cost of highly and fully automated vehicles outpaces current development and testing methodologies. These factors all exacerbate the cost, resource and time requirements of testing AVs. Jeff Blackburn will discuss how the legacy simulation tools are limiting the testing that needs to take place. He'll also explain how scalable cloud based simulation is the enabling technology making the deployment of AVs possible by providing an immediate means to test the performance of autonomous systems in a risk-free environment, allowing automakers to stick to their 202X AV production goals. Jeffery Blackburn, Metamoto 12:00 p.m. Networking Lunch 1:00 p.m. ORAL ONLY Hardware-in-the-Loop (HIL) Implementation and Validation of SAE Level 2 Autonomous Vehicle with Subsystem Fault Tolerant Fallback Performance for Takeover Scenarios The advancement towards development of autonomy follows either the bottom- up approach of gradually improving and expanding existing Advanced Driver Assist Systems (ADAS) technology where the driver is present in the control loop or the top-down approach of directly developing Autonomous Vehicles (AV) hardware and software using alternative approaches without the driver present in the control loop. Most ADAS systems today fall under the classification of SAE Level 1 which is also referred to as the driver assistance level. The progression from SAE Level 1 to SAE Level 2 or partial automation involves the critical task of merging autonomous lateral control and autonomous longitudinal control such that the tasks of steering and acceleration/deceleration are not required to be handled by the driver under certain conditions [1]. However, the driver is still required to monitor the driving environment and handle scenarios where control is handed over to the driver due to subsystem faults of the autonomous system. Due to the disadvantages of vehicle testing being expensive, time-consuming and hazardous for testing such scenarios, an alternative method of development and validation is required. Therefore, the objectives of this research are two-fold. The first objective focuses on a real-time powertrain-based Hardware-in-the- Loop (HIL) implementation and validation of an SAE Level 2 autonomous vehicle. The second objective focuses on studying the performance of SAE Level 2 autonomous vehicles during takeover scenarios due to subsystem faults. To accomplish these objectives, an acceleration-based Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) was combined with a path-following lateral control along with supervisory control for system mode transitions due to system deactivations and faults. This research presents system modes in which longitudinal control only and lateral control only are engaged as fallback states to the full autonomous system being faulted for lateral control and longitudinal control failures respectively. Simulations were conducted to evaluate the performance of the autonomous controls when subjected to these faults. A powertrain subsystem representative of the 2017 Ford Fusion Hybrid was used as the hardware simulation platform using a dSPACE HIL simulator and CarSim RT. Adit Joshi, Ford Motor Company 1:30 p.m. ORAL ONLY The Two Pathways to Safe Mobility <p>Motor vehicle traffic fatalities had been steadily declining for a number of years, and between 2005 and 2011, there was an average decrease of over 1564 fatalities per year over that period. However, this trend has reversed since then, and an increase in these statistics has occurred through the first nine months of 2016, and NHTSA has estimated that the increase in 2016 may be as high as 8 percent over the previous year, based on the nine month’s data that are available for 2016 (NHTSA Traffic Safety Facts, January 2017). This increase, though significant, NHTSA has stated that in 2015 it was mainly due to fatality increases in vulnerable road users such as pedestrians, motorcyclists and pedal cyclists. However, it is not clear if there has been any attempt to understand the technical reasons for this increase beyond the increase in vehicle miles driven, except to rationalize it by saying that similar trends have been observed previously during a period of strong economic growth. Nevertheless, these vulnerable road user casualties need solutions as much as occupant casualties in traffic crashes.</p> Passive safety systems that are found in vehicles of today in the fleet were generally phased in over a period of three or four years through the National Highway Safety Administration (NHTSA) mandated regulations, or through New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) and other such rating programs, as the main driver for safety enhancement. </p The main thrust of this presentation is to discuss crash causation and the role of the driver, the vehicle, and various driver assistance technologies on total safety and the implications of autonomy as a safety strategy. Additionally, potential deployment strategies of technologies and challenges for both approaches will be discussed. Using automatic braking technologies as an example, a case analysis of a hypothetical example based on U.S. rear-end crash data will be presented. A discussion of practical challenges in deployment of fully autonomous systems and driver assistance systems will also be offered to point out the need for a systematic analysis of costs and benefits, as well as ratio of benefits to costs for various levels of autonomy. The importance for consumer acceptance of various systems and the potential concerns related to reliability, security, privacy and liability issues, as well as need for significant investments in infrastructure for deployment of fully autonomous vehicles will also be discussed. The importance of active and passive safety integration will also be pointed out.</br> Joseph Kanianthra, retired, NHTSA 2:00 p.m. ORAL ONLY Observations on ADAS and Automated Driving in the Wild The concept of automating vehicles and removing the driver from direct control of the throttle, brake, and steering wheel was first explored nearly 100 years ago. Over the decades since, billons of dollars have been invested and automation has infiltrated the automobile in a multitude of ways. This talk will center on observations from the field, gathered through the Advanced Vehicle Technologies (AVT) consortium and other salient events. Highlighted will be observations on the use of production level automated driving features, the shifting nature of what we do in modern vehicles, and perceptions of the evolving automation technologies. Bryan Reimer, Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2:30 p.m. ORAL ONLY Integrated Safety As higher levels of automation evolve in future vehicles the goal will be to provide additional value to consumers. During the ride occupants may enjoy a higher flexibility by working, relaxing or interacting with other occupants. These additional use cases lead to challenges in designing an occupant safety system that maintains or enhances the level of safety during all modes of driving. This presentation defines a potential approach for an occupant safety system that supports alternative interior configurations and seat positions and discusses the role of enabling technologies such as advanced occupant sensing technologies that will help drive the integration of automated driving, occupant safety and consumer experience. Frank Laakmann, ZF Friedrichshafen AG 3:00
Recommended publications
  • Fan Assembly Control Modules
    Commercial Vehicles and Services FA70796 FA72133 Fan Assembly Control Modules Top Selling Cooling Fans Assemblies with Modules FA70796 Tech Tip Application: Ford Edge 15-07; Lincoln MKX 15-07 Do not bench test a fan assembly equipped with a control model prior to installation. Fan Assembly control modules require a specific electronic signal and voltage from the ECU. Using a generic 12 volt power source will cause irreversible damage to the FA71750 control module and fan. Application: Infiniti JX35 2013, QX60 19-14; Nissan Pathfinder 19-13 Did you know? Fan Assembly control modules require a specific electronic signal and voltage from the ECU. Using a generic 12 volt power source, such as a battery charger, will cause irreversible damage to the module FA72133 and fan. The first time many technicians Application: Jeep Cherokee 19-14 replace a late model fan assembly they figure it’s a simple electronic component replacement, and unfortunately, many fan assembly modules are ruined because of a lack of knowledge of how modern fan assemblies work. Continental Automotive Systems 800-564-5066 l [email protected] l www.continentalaftermarket.com © 2020 Tech Support: 800-265-1818 l [email protected] Fan Assembly Control Modules Application Coverage Continental Applications Part Number FA70238 Mitsubishi Galant 03-99 FA70240 Chrysler Sebring 05-01; Dodge Stratus 05-01; Mitsubishi Eclipse 05-00 FA70242 Mitsubishi Eclipse 2000, Galant 00-99 FA70267 Lexus RX330 06-04 FA70273 Mazda 6 08-03 FA70309 Mazda 3 09-04 FA70311 Ford
    [Show full text]
  • Ford Fusion Hybrid Manual Do Proprietário
    Ford Fusion Hybrid Manual do proprietário Importante: As informações aqui contidas referem-se a um veículo Ford Fusion equipado com todos os opcionais e equipamentos disponíveis. O seu Ford Fusion poderá não dispor de todos os equipamentos mostrados neste manual. Os dados contidos no manual são meramente informativos do modo de usar cada equipamento, não constituindo qualquer garantia quanto à existência, às características técnicas ou à forma deles em seu veículo. As ilustrações, informações técnicas e especificações desta publicação eram as vigentes até o momento de sua impressão. A Ford Motor Company Brasil Ltda. reserva-se ao direito de, a qualquer tempo, revisar, modificar, descontinuar ou alterar qualquer modelo de seus produtos, sem prévio aviso. Nenhuma dessas ações gerará por si qualquer obrigação ou responsabilidade para a Ford ou para o vendedor face ao cliente. Fica proibida a reprodução total ou parcial desta publicação, assim como de suas ilustrações ou ainda traduções, gravações e fotocópias da mesma, por meios mecânicos ou eletrônicos, sem a permissão prévia da Ford Motor Company Brasil Ltda. Todos os direitos reservados. Dirija sempre com prudência obedecendo os limites de velocidade e utilize o cinto de segurança para todos os ocupantes. © Ford Motor Company 2016 Índice Introdução Sistema de segurança Sobre este manual...........................................7 suplementar Glossário de símbolos.....................................7 Princípios de funcionamento....................40 Registro de dados............................................9
    [Show full text]
  • ITEM BID 00-05164 MARCH 12, 2013 a Bid: Purchase of Replacement
    ITEM BID 00-05164 VILLAGE OF DOWNERS GROVE REPORT FOR THE VILLAGE COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 12, 2013 AGENDA SUBJECT: TYPE: SUBMITTED BY: Resolution Ordinance Bid: Purchase of Replacement 9 Motion Nan Newlon, P.E. Vehicles Discussion Only Director of Public Works SYNOPSIS A motion is requested to authorize the purchase of nine vehicles in the total amount of $260,000.21. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT The goals for 2011-2018 identified Exceptional Municipal Services. FISCAL IMPACT The adopted FY13 budget includes $285,000 in the Equipment Replacement Fund for the purchase of these nine replacement vehicles. This recommended purchase is $260,000.21. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval on the March 12, 2013 Consent Agenda. BACKGROUND The 2013 vehicle replacement schedule provides for the replacement of 13 vehicles. The table below shows the nine vehicles recommended for purchase at this time. Quantity Type of Vehicle Make and Model Dealer Price Hybrid Four Door 2013 Ford Fusion Wright Automotive of 2 Sedans Hybrid Hillsboro, IL $47,596.00 E85 Two wheel Miles Chevrolet of Decatur, 2 drive utility 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe IL vehicles $55,292.79 E85 Four wheel Miles Chevrolet of Decatur, 5 drive utility 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe $157,111.42 IL vehicles The Village’s Fleet Team, consisting of representatives from the Village Manager’s Office and Finance, Public Works, Police and Fire Departments have evaluated the need to replace the vehicles and pieces of equipment scheduled for this year. All Village vehicles and equipment are targeted for replacement according to useful lifecycle replacement criteria. These criteria include age, usage, condition, repair costs, fuel efficiency and environmental impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution No. 2020-087 a Resolution of the City
    RESOLUTION NO. 2020-087 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELK GROVE AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO SELL OR OTHERWISE DISPOSE OF SURPLUS CITY PROPERTY IN THE FORM OF LAW ENFORCEMENT VEHICLES, LAW ENFORCEMENT EQUIPMENT, AND TRANSIT VEHICLES WHEREAS, the City of Elk Grove purchased vehicles to be utilized by the Elk Grove Police Department and Transit Division in the normal course of their duties; and WHEREAS, staff has designated fourteen law enforcement vehicles as surplus, as they have reached the end of their service life based on years in service, high mileage, and/or frequency/cost of repairs, and collision damage, and three transit vehicles as surplus as they have reached the end of their service life based on years in service, high mileage, and/or high frequency/cost of repairs; and WHEREAS, the law enforcement vehicles are equipped with emergency response equipment that shall be removed prior to any public sale; and WHEREAS, Elk Grove Municipal Code Chapter 3.42 specifies the terms and conditions for the disposition of surplus City property; and WHEREAS, the City of Elk Grove desires to surplus fourteen law enforcement vehicles, their emergency response equipment, and three transit vehicles, and sell at fair market value or otherwise dispose of the assets. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Elk Grove hereby authorizes the Finance Director to exercise the sale or disposal of surplus City property in the form of fourteen law enforcement vehicles, including the disposal of any associated emergency response equipment, and three transit vehicles as shown in Exhibit A to this resolution, incorporated herein by reference, through sale to other law enforcement agencies, re-use by the City, or designated as unsalvageable, based on the needs of the City; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that proceeds from any sale or disposal of the surplus vehicles shall be deposited into the Facilities and Fleet Internal Services Fund and Transit Fund, as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Perfecting Policy with Pilots: New Mobility and Av Urban Delivery PILOT PROJECT ASSESSMENT
    Perfecting policy with pilots: New Mobility and av urban delivery PILOT PROJECT ASSESSMENT APRIL 2020 urbanism next center @urbanismnext urbanismnext.org in partnership with ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS RESEARCHERS AND AUTHORS Becky Steckler, AICP, Program Director, Urbanism Next Juliette Coia, Student Researcher, Urbanism Next Amanda Howell, Project Manager, Urbanism Next Grace Kaplowitz, Student Researcher, Urbanism Next Matthew Stoll, Graphic Design, Urbanism Next Huajie Yang, Student Researcher, Portland State University TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE This project relied on the time and support of the following people that volunteered to be on a technical advisory committee. Thank you. Russ Brooks, Founder, Scale Consulting Terra Curtis, Principal, Emerging Mobility Co-Lead, Nelson\Nygaard José Holguín-Veras, Director of VREF Center of Excellence for Sustainable Urban Freight Systems, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Emily Lindsey, Transportation Technology Strategist, Denver Regional Council of Governments Carlos Pardo, Senior Manager, City Pilots, NUMO Francie Stefan, Chief Mobility Officer/Assistant Director of Planning & Community Development, City of Santa Monica Cover image credits (in order as they appear): 1. Marek Rucinski, Unsplash. 2. Dan Gold, Unsplash. 3. Christopher Down, Wikimedia 4. Urbanism Next. 5. Waymo. Chapter image credits (in order as they appear): 6. Lily Banse, Unsplash. 7. Jump Bike. 8. Jason Briscoe, Unsplash. 9. Nguyen Trong, Adobe Stock. 10. Suad Kamardeen, Unsplash. 11. Zachary Staines, Unsplash. 12. Jump Bike. 13.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Ford Fusion Brochure
    FUSION S | SE | SEL | TITANIUM | V6 SPORT 2019 YOUR WAY Take your pick of 5 trim levels, starting with the well-equipped Fusion S featuring the new Ford Co-Pilot360™ suite of standard driver-assist technologies1 designed to help you navigate FUSIONyour world confidently. At the top end of the lineup, there’s the luxurious Titanium and the 325-horsepower2 V6 Sport. You can also select from 3 powertrain styles – gasoline, hybrid and plug-in hybrid – each offering you impressive fuel efficiency. All of these qualities, plus a sleek new look, make the 2019 Fusion a smarter choice than ever. GASOLINE ENGINES HYBRIDS (Gas Engine+Electric Motor) PLUG-IN HYBRID (Gas Engine+Electric Motor+Charge Port) 2019 Fusion | ford.com Fusion Hybrid Titanium. White Platinum Metallic Tri-coat. Available equipment. 1Driver-assist features are supplemental and do not replace the driver’s attention, judgment and need to control the vehicle. 2Horsepower rating achieved with 93-octane fuel. GEARED TOWARD YOUR PASSIONFOR PERFORMANCE 2.0L ECOBOOST With robust low-end torque and virtually no turbo lag, EcoBoost® engines mix 1.5L ECOBOOST turbocharging, direct injection, and twin 2.7L ECOBOOST V6 2.5L i-VCT Auto Start-Stop Technology can help independent variable cam timing (Ti-VCT) The most powerful car in its class,4 Fusion V6 This proven performer gets the Fusion reduce fuel consumption by shutting off for a potent blend of horsepower Sport pairs this twin-turbocharged engine with gas engine lineup off to a strong start. the engine when the vehicle comes to a and efficiency. all-wheel drive and a 6-speed SelectShift® Take control of its 6-speed automatic complete stop.
    [Show full text]
  • Applications Ford Escape Hybrid L4 2.5L Ford Escape Limited L4 2.5L
    TECHNICAL SUPPORT 888-910-8888 FP55A DESCRIPTION MATERIAL Automotive Oil Pan Aluminum Casting HEIGHT 4-7/8 in. Applications Ford Escape Hybrid L4 2.5L YEAR FUEL FUEL DELIVERY ASP. ENG. VIN ENG. DESG 2012 ELECTRIC/GAS FI N 3 - 2011 ELECTRIC/GAS FI N 3 - 2010 ELECTRIC/GAS FI N 3 - 2009 ELECTRIC/GAS FI N 3 - Ford Escape Limited L4 2.5L YEAR FUEL FUEL DELIVERY ASP. ENG. VIN ENG. DESG 2012 GAS FI N 7 - 2011 GAS FI N 7 - 2010 GAS FI N 7 - 2009 GAS FI N 7 - Ford Escape Limited Hybrid L4 2.5L YEAR FUEL FUEL DELIVERY ASP. ENG. VIN ENG. DESG 2012 ELECTRIC/GAS FI N 3 - 2011 ELECTRIC/GAS FI N 3 - 2010 ELECTRIC/GAS FI N 3 - 2009 ELECTRIC/GAS FI N 3 - Ford Escape XLS L4 2.5L YEAR FUEL FUEL DELIVERY ASP. ENG. VIN ENG. DESG 2012 GAS FI N 7 - 2011 GAS FI N 7 - 2010 GAS FI N 7 - 2009 GAS FI N 7 - Ford Escape XLT L4 2.5L YEAR FUEL FUEL DELIVERY ASP. ENG. VIN ENG. DESG 2012 GAS FI N 7 - 2011 GAS FI N 7 - 2010 GAS FI N 7 - 2009 GAS FI N 7 - Ford Fusion Hybrid L4 2.5L YEAR FUEL FUEL DELIVERY ASP. ENG. VIN ENG. DESG 2012 ELECTRIC/GAS FI N 3 - 2011 ELECTRIC/GAS FI N 3 - 2010 ELECTRIC/GAS FI N 3 - Ford Fusion S L4 2.5L YEAR FUEL FUEL DELIVERY ASP. ENG. VIN ENG. DESG 2012 GAS FI N A - 2011 GAS FI N A - 2010 GAS FI N A - Ford Fusion SE L4 2.5L YEAR FUEL FUEL DELIVERY ASP.
    [Show full text]
  • Plugging In: a Consumer's Guide to the Electric Vehicle
    Plugging In: A Consumer’s Guide to the Electric Vehicle Today’s Choices in Cars Hybrid vehicles Late in 2010 the first mass-produced electric vehicles hit dealer showrooms, bringing car buyers a new, electric option. Electric cars offer performance, safety and versatility and can be charged from the electric grid, providing convenient, low- cost, at-home charging. At the U.S. national average price of 11.5 cents per kilowatt-hour, buying electricity is approximately equivalent to buying gasoline at $1 per gallon. Displacing gasoline with Hybrid vehicles are powered by a gasoline engine and an one or more electric motors. electricity also lowers emissions and decreases petroleum use. On a typical day half of all The battery is charged as the vehicle drives, so the vehicle is powered ultimately by gasoline. Examples drivers log 25 miles or less, so electric vehicles – are the Toyota Prius and Ford Fusion Hybrid. if widely adopted – could reduce petroleum fuel Hybrid vehicles cannot be recharged from the grid. consumption by 70 to 90%. Hybrids operate like conventional vehicles and are fueled with gasoline. Generally they are more One challenge for consumers is to understand efficient than conventional vehicles since they use their driving needs and how each vehicle option technologies that turn off the gasoline engine at a can meet their specific requirements. stop and capture braking energy for battery power instead of turning it into heat. Here are the three options and some essential points for buyers to know about each: Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles Electric vehicles Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles are powered by a Electric vehicles are powered by an electric motor gasoline engine and electric motor, but they have and battery alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Ford Motor Company: Hybrid Driveline Design & Control
    Ford Motor Company: Hybrid Driveline Design & Control 1. Context One of the most popular hybrid vehicles on the road today is the Ford Fusion Hybrid. Winner of the Car of the Year award at the 2010 North American International Auto Show in Detroit, the Ford Fusion Hybrid has become both a technological and commercial success for Ford Motor Company. Ford Motor Company (www.Ford.com) dedicates considerable resources to improving the design of products like the Fusion Hybrid by using Hardware-in-the-Loop (HIL) testing technologies. These HIL technologies can be applied to all aspects of vehicle design including engine control development, transmission control, body electronics, chassis control systems and traffic control & active safety systems. In many cases, the HIL simulation approach is a valuable alternative to testing with physical prototypes since testing with physical prototypes early in the design process can result in costly damage to physical hardware. Hybrid driveline design and control is one of the key aspects of the next generation of hybrid vehicle, including the Ford Fusion Hybrid. At the heart of the hybrid driveline is the electric motor drive. Although electric motor drive technology is very mature, its use in the automotive industry is new. In addition, simulation of these electric motor drives poses a number of challenges for Ford engineers. As a result, caution must be taken to ensure that the safety and reliability of hybrid driveline designs meets the very high quality expectation of Ford’s customers. OPAL-RT TECHNOLOGIES 1 2. Challenge Modern automotive design architectures rely heavily on new, complex power electronic, electrical and mechanical systems, which often must be designed, tested and integrated concurrently.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Selling Points 1
    2016 PRIUS v MODELS & COLORS KEY SELLING POINTS 1. Spacious seating 2. Impressive cargo capability 3. Impressive standard and available tech features including Entune™ Audio 4. A hybrid leader 5. Traditional Prius virtues WHAT’S NEW Interior • In-Cabin Technology—Entune® App Suite1 now includes Slacker Radio and replaces Bing with Destination Search TOYOTA POCKET SOURCE BOOK | 2016 PRIUS v 1 2016 PRIUS v MODELS & COLORS MODELS TRIM TRANS. ENGINE CYL. MODEL # MSRP1 5-DOOR LIFTBACK Prius v Two 1243 $26,675 ECVT 1.8L 4 Prius v Three 1245 $28,060 ECVT 1.8L 4 Prius v Four 1247 $29,695 ECVT 1.8L 4 Prius v Five 1249 $30,935 ECVT 1.8L 4 COLORS (For color samples go to http://www.eshowroom.toyota.com) INTERIOR PRIUS v EXTERIOR (CODE) (CODE) PRIUS v TWO THREE PRIUS v FOUR PRIUS v FIVE Absolutely Red (3P0) Black (22) ■ ■ ■ ■ Bisque (48) ■ ■ Blizzard Pearl (070) Ash (19) ■ ■ ■ ■ Black (22) ■ ■ ■ ■ Bisque (48) ■ ■ Blue Ribbon Ash (19) ■ ■ ■ ■ Metallic (8T5) Black (22) ■ ■ ■ ■ Bisque (48) ■ ■ Classic Silver Metallic Ash (19) ■ ■ ■ ■ (1F7) Black (22) ■ ■ ■ ■ Clear Sky Ash (19) ■ ■ ■ ■ Metallic (787) Black (22) ■ ■ ■ ■ Bisque (48) ■ ■ Magnetic Gray Ash (19) ■ ■ ■ ■ Metallic (1G3) Black (22) ■ ■ ■ ■ Sea Glass Pearl (781) Ash (19) ■ ■ ■ ■ Black (22) ■ ■ ■ ■ TOYOTA POCKET SOURCE BOOK | 2016 PRIUS v 2 2016 PRIUS v MODELS & COLORS Bisque (48) ■ ■ Toasted Walnut Pearl Ash (19) ■ ■ ■ ■ (4W4) Black (22) ■ ■ Bisque (48) ■ ■ Attitude Metallic Ash (19) ■ ■ Black (218) Black (22) ■ ■ Bisque (48) ■ ■ TOYOTA POCKET SOURCE BOOK | 2016 PRIUS v 3 2016 PRIUS v TRIMS TRIMS AT A GLANCE PRIUS v TWO ICONIC FOUNDATION • 16 in.
    [Show full text]
  • Competitive Comparison Guide 15Competitive Comparison Guide
    15 COMPETITIVEOMPETITIVE COMPARISONCOMPARISON GUIDEGUIDE 2015 Ford Competitive Strengths Fiesta 2 New Focus 4 New Focus Electric 6 C-MAX Hybrid 8 C-MAX Energi 10 Fusion 12 Fusion Hybrid 14 Fusion Energi 16 Taurus 18 Escape 20 All-New Edge 22 Explorer 24 Flex 26 New Expedition 28 New Expedition EL 30 All-New F-150 32 Make a judicious evaluation. F-250 Super Duty® 36 Compare our top fleet sellers to the competition – decide what’s F-350 Super Duty 38 best for your drivers and your bottom line. This handy guide details F-350 Super Duty Chassis Cab 40 key Ford advantages, enabling you to make a thorough examination. F-450 Super Duty Chassis Cab 42 Among our 25 featured vehicles in the pages that follow, you’ll learn F-550 Super Duty Chassis Cab 44 specifically why our all-new 2015 F-150, Transit and Edge, along with Transit Connect 46 our new 2015 Expedition, Focus and Focus Electric, are so highly valued. New Transit Van 48 In other words, you can go further with Ford Fleet. New Transit Wagon 50 Clockwise: F-150 XLT, Escape Titanium, Fusion Titanium, C-MAX Hybrid SE, Fiesta Titanium Hatchback. Available equipment. E-450 Cutaway 52 2015 COMPETITIVE COMPARISON GUIDE • fleet.ford.com • 1.800.34.FLEET 1 2015 Ford Fiesta Competitive Strengths Side-by-Side Comparison ® First-ever 2 Works to keep the vehicle from Available 1.0L EcoBoost I-3 engine. Hill Launch Assist. 2015 FORD FIESTA SEDAN SE 2015 CHEVROLET SONIC SEDAN LT 2015 NISSAN VERSA 3-cylinder engine from Ford is peppy, efficient, and rolling back on a slope.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change and the Environmental Impacts of Our Vehicles and Operations
    Home Contact Downloads GRI Index UNGC Index Site Map Glossary corporate.ford.com Sustainability 2012/13 YEAR IN OUR BLUEPRINT FOR FINANCIAL CLIMATE CHANGE AND WATER VEHICLE SUPPLY CHAIN PEOPLE FORD AROUND REVIEW SUSTAINABILITY HEALTH THE ENVIRONMENT SAFETY THE WORLD CLIMATE CHANGE Doing our part to reduce climate change PRODUCTS AND TECHNOLOGIES Delivering vehicles and technologies that reduce our Climate and environmental impact Environment FACILITIES Reducing energy use, We have comprehensive emissions, water use and strategies for minimizing our waste across our operations environmental impacts. At Ford, we have been working for many years to minimize the We plan to reduce waste sent to landfill per vehicle by Climate Change and the environmental impacts of our vehicles and operations. Environment 40 percent For example, we are doing our part to prevent or reduce the potential for environmental, economic Design for Lifecycle Sustainability between 2011 and 2016 and social harm due to climate change. We have a science-based strategy to reduce greenhouse globally. Climate Change gas (GHG) emissions from our products and operations that focuses on doing our share to stabilize carbon dioxide (CO2 ) concentrations in the atmosphere. We are on track to meet the Greening Our Products central elements of our strategy: Each of our new vehicles is a leader, or among the leaders, in fuel Greening Our Operations economy, and we are reducing GHG emissions across our global product portfolio. We have also set a goal to reduce our facility CO2 emissions per vehicle by 30 percent by 2025 compared to a Data 2010 baseline, building on our reduction of 31 percent from 2000 to 2010.
    [Show full text]