(PRP) Injection in Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis ⇑ Enass M

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(PRP) Injection in Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis ⇑ Enass M The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine xxx (2017) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine journal homepage: www.sciencedirect.com/locate/ejrnm Original Article Role of Ultrasound Guided Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Injection in Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis ⇑ Enass M. Khattab , Mohamad H. Abowarda Department of Radiodiagnosis, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt article info abstract Article history: Background: Lateral epicondylitis is referred to a degenerative disorder that affects the common extensor Received 15 November 2016 tendon (CET) where it attaches to the lateral epicondyle of the humerus. Nowadays, one of minimally Accepted 4 March 2017 invasive interventions is platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection that had been explored in some controlled Available online xxxx clinical studies to show its effectiveness in treating lateral epicondylitis through inducing inflammation rather than suppressing it. Keywords: Objectives: The aim of our study was to investigate the effectiveness of ultrasound guided platelet-rich Ultrasound plasma (PRP) injection in treating chronic lateral epicondylitis in addition to identifying the potential Injection of PRP sonographic morphological changes in the common extensor tendon (CET) after PRP injection. Lateral epicondylitis Results: Statistical analysis showed high significant improvement in all ultrasound findings of common extensor tendon (CET) including echotexture, thickness, cross section, partial tear and calcification in majority of patients. Conclusion: We concluded that US-guided platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection for treatment of lateral epicondylitis was a safe, minimally invasive and effective procedure in improving the sonographic and pathological changes of common extensor tendon (CET). Ó 2017 The Egyptian Society of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. Production and hosting by Elsevier. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/ 4.0/). 1. Introduction However, medications like non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), physical therapy, shock wave therapy, botulism Lateral epicondylitis is referred as a degenerative disorder that toxin injection and corticosteroids injection were used to treat lat- affects the common extensor tendon (CET) where it attaches to the eral epicondylitis many studies showed that they did not alter poor lateral epicondyle of the humerus [1]. healing of the CET and had long term course of treatment. In addi- Waseem et al. [2] explained that this condition is not an inflam- tion, adverse side effects of long-run use of NSAIDs like bleeding matory process with no inflammatory cells (e.g. macrophages, lym- ulcers and renal failure and those of corticosteroids like tendon phocytes or neutrophils) could be detected in the affected tissue. atrophy and permanent structural changes, make these types of But, it is a form of tendinosis that affects the common extensor ten- treatments controversial [4]. don with a fibroblastic and vascular response called angio- Nowadays, minimally invasive interventions that stimulate fibroblastic degeneration of CET. Moreover, tennis elbow (TE) is healing response and counteracting the degenerative structural considered a misnomer since tennis player account for only about changes in lateral epicondylitis have been investigated. One of these 5% of all patients suffering from this condition. That make ‘‘lateral emerging technologies is platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection [5]. epicondylosis” or ‘‘lateral elbow tendinosis” is the most appropriate Platelet-rich plasma is a volume of the plasma fraction of autol- term that express that condition. Despite of this lateral epicondyli- ogous blood having a platelet concentration of 5 times more than tis is more recognized and widely used in the scientific community. base line (5 Â 200,000 platelets/ul). Platelets in PRP contain growth The annual prevalence of lateral epicondylitis is about 1–3% of factors and build up reparative processes. The action of PRP population that induces morbidity secondary to pain and function therapy in chronic tendinopathies is varied and hypothesized to disability that prevents an active life style [3]. include angiogenesis, increase in growth factor expression and cell proliferation, increase the effect of repair cells and tensile strength. Peer review under responsibility of The Egyptian Society of Radiology and Nuclear Lateral epicondylitis may be characterized by complex changes in Medicine. the tendon in addition to an inflammatory process. Therefore, ⇑ Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (E.M. Khattab). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrnm.2017.03.002 0378-603X/Ó 2017 The Egyptian Society of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. Production and hosting by Elsevier. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Please cite this article in press as: Khattab EM, Abowarda MH. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrnm.2017.03.002 2 E.M. Khattab, M.H. Abowarda / The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine xxx (2017) xxx–xxx PRP owing to its high content of various growth factors may be 38 years old).The mean time of symptoms was19.95 months more effective as a healing agent [5]. (range 3–36 months). Patients were diagnosed, treated and fol- Diagnostic ultrasound and MRI before PRP injection will help to lowed up in the ultrasound unit in the Radiology Department by confirm clinical diagnosis and establish baseline findings. sonographic assessments at baseline diagnosis, during injection Ultrasound guidance of the injection will ensure precise targeting of PRP, three and six months post procedure. of tissue needle placement and real-time visualization of needle during injection with documentation of changes in tendon mor- 2.1.2. Subjects included in the study phology & structure after PRP injection [6]. US is an excellent option for diagnostic imaging evaluation of Inclusion criteria: lateral epicondylitis, with a reported sensitivity of approximately 1. All patients were suspected to have chronic lateral epi- 80% and specificity of approximately 50%. Tendinosis appears as condylitis as determined on clinical examination (based on tendon enlargement and heterogeneity. Tendon tears are depicted symptoms, site of tenderness and pain elicited with resisted as hypoechoic regions with adjacent tendon discontinuity. Sur- active extension of the wrist in pronation and elbow in rounding fluid and calcification also may be seen [7]. extension) and confirmed with base line ultrasonographic The normal MR imaging appearance of the CET is that of a ver- examination and MRI examinations. tically oriented structure that originates from the lateral epi- 2. History of at least two periods of elbow pain lasting condyle. The tendon should show uniform low signal intensity, >10 days; symptoms lasting at least 3 months or longer. regardless of the imaging sequence used. Tendon morphology is Exclusion criteria: best assessed on coronal and axial images. The MR imaging find- 1. Patients with normal base line ultrasonographic imaging. ings of lateral epicondylitis on both T1- and T2-weighted images 2. Presence of full tendon tear. include intermediate signal intensity within the substance of the 3. Patients received local steroid injection within 3 months of tendon with or without tendon thickening. Partial thickness tears randomization; are seen as a region with the signal intensity of fluid extending 4. Patients received oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory or partway across the tendon [8]. corticosteroids within 15 days before inclusion in the study. The aim of the present study is to investigate the effectiveness 5. Patients unable to comply with scheduled visits. of ultrasound guided (PRP) injection in treating chronic lateral epi- 6. History of trauma. condylitis in addition to identify the potential sonographic mor- 7. Medical history of rheumatic disorder. phological changes in the CET after PRP injection with respect to All patients were subjected to: the baseline sonographic findings. 1. Full history taking. 2. Clinical evaluation of all patients at baseline, they were asked to rate their levels of pain and function disability from 2. Patients and methods 0 to 10 according to a validated questionnaire called PRTEE Questionnaire (Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation). It 2.1. Technical design consists of two subscales, PAIN subscale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable) and FUNCTION subscale (0 = no diffi- 2.1.1. Site of the study, sample size and methods of collection of culty, 10 = unable to do). In addition to the individual sub- patients scale scores, a total score was computed on a scale of 100 Forty-two patients (31 females and 11 males), were included in (0 = no disability) where pain and functional problems are the study with age range from 30 to 50 years old (median of age weighted equally [9] Table 1 Symptoms before and 6 months after treatment. Symptoms Before treatment (N = 42) 6 months after treatment Test p-value (Sig.) (N = 42) No. % No. % Impaired grip No 0 0% 16 38.1% 19.765§ <0.001 (HS) Yes 42 100% 26 61.9% Restricted daily activities No 0 0% 9 21.4% 10.080§ <0.001 (HS) Yes 42 100% 33 78.6% Pain No 0 0% 16 38.1% 19.765§ <0.001 (HS) Yes 42 100% 26 61.9% PRTEE pain subscale Mean ± SD 29.97 ± 10.35 19.92 ± 11.61 À5.306a <0.001 (HS) Median (range) 29.50 (12–47) 18 (6–48) PRTEE function subscale Mean ± SD 30.38 ± 11.02 20.30 ± 11.31 À5.297a <0.001 (HS) Median (range) 30 (11–48) 19.50 (4–48) PRTEE total score Mean ± SD 60.35 ± 21.36 40.23 ± 22.79 À5.382a <0.001 (HS) Median (range) 59.50 (23–95) 37.50 (10–96) p < 0.05 is significant. Sig.: significance. a Wilcoxon signed ranks test. § McNemar test. Please cite this article in press as: Khattab EM, Abowarda MH. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrnm.2017.03.002 E.M.
Recommended publications
  • Disability Classification System
    CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR STUDENTS WITH A DISABILITY Track & Field (NB: also used for Cross Country where applicable) Current Previous Definition Classification Classification Deaf (Track & Field Events) T/F 01 HI 55db loss on the average at 500, 1000 and 2000Hz in the better Equivalent to Au2 ear Visually Impaired T/F 11 B1 From no light perception at all in either eye, up to and including the ability to perceive light; inability to recognise objects or contours in any direction and at any distance. T/F 12 B2 Ability to recognise objects up to a distance of 2 metres ie below 2/60 and/or visual field of less than five (5) degrees. T/F13 B3 Can recognise contours between 2 and 6 metres away ie 2/60- 6/60 and visual field of more than five (5) degrees and less than twenty (20) degrees. Intellectually Disabled T/F 20 ID Intellectually disabled. The athlete’s intellectual functioning is 75 or below. Limitations in two or more of the following adaptive skill areas; communication, self-care; home living, social skills, community use, self direction, health and safety, functional academics, leisure and work. They must have acquired their condition before age 18. Cerebral Palsy C2 Upper Severe to moderate quadriplegia. Upper extremity events are Wheelchair performed by pushing the wheelchair with one or two arms and the wheelchair propulsion is restricted due to poor control. Upper extremity athletes have limited control of movements, but are able to produce some semblance of throwing motion. T/F 33 C3 Wheelchair Moderate quadriplegia. Fair functional strength and moderate problems in upper extremities and torso.
    [Show full text]
  • Ifds Functional Classification System & Procedures
    IFDS FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM & PROCEDURES MANUAL 2009 - 2012 Effective – 1 January 2009 Originally Published – March 2009 IFDS, C/o ISAF UK Ltd, Ariadne House, Town Quay, Southampton, Hampshire, SO14 2AQ, GREAT BRITAIN Tel. +44 2380 635111 Fax. +44 2380 635789 Email: [email protected] Web: www.sailing.org/disabled 1 Contents Page Introduction 5 Part A – Functional Classification System Rules for Sailors A1 General Overview and Sailor Evaluation 6 A1.1 Purpose 6 A1.2 Sailing Functions 6 A1.3 Ranking of Functional Limitations 6 A1.4 Eligibility for Competition 6 A1.5 Minimum Disability 7 A2 IFDS Class and Status 8 A2.1 Class 8 A2.2 Class Status 8 A2.3 Master List 10 A3 Classification Procedure 10 A3.0 Classification Administration Fee 10 A3.1 Personal Assistive Devices 10 A3.2 Medical Documentation 11 A3.3 Sailors’ Responsibility for Classification Evaluation 11 A3.4 Sailor Presentation for Classification Evaluation 12 A3.5 Method of Assessment 12 A3.6 Deciding the Class 14 A4 Failure to attend/Non Co-operation/Misrepresentation 16 A4.1 Sailor Failure to Attend Evaluation 16 A4.2 Non Co-operation during Evaluation 16 A4.3 International Misrepresentation of Skills and/or Abilities 17 A4.4 Consequences for Sailor Support Personnel 18 A4.5 Consequences for Teams 18 A5 Specific Rules for Boat Classes 18 A5.1 Paralympic Boat Classes 18 A5.2 Non-Paralympic Boat Classes 19 Part B – Protest and Appeals B1 Protest 20 B1.1 General Principles 20 B1.2 Class Status and Protest Opportunities 21 B1.3 Parties who may submit a Classification Protest
    [Show full text]
  • Cam Switches
    Cam switches 10 Cam operated switches 11 General characteristics 12 Reference system 13 Technical data 14 Dimensions 18 Auxiliary contacts 19 Mounting possibilities 20 Mounting schemes 22 Special mountings 25 Accessories 31 Enclosures 32 Standard electrical schemes 46 Special diagrams 48 Main switches with undervoltage release 50 Discrepancy switches Cam switches Cam operated switches A5 cam operated switches have General characteristics been designed to operate as switch-disconnectors, main • Permits any electrical diagrams oxidation of their ferrous switches, load break switches, and makes the number of components. changeover switches, motor possible diagrams limitless. • High number of mechanical control switches,… • Abrupt breaking mechanism operations. with 30, 45, 60 o 90° positions, • According to RoHS standard. According to Standards according to diagram and requirements. • IEC 60947-3 • Contact decks made of self- • UL 508 extinguishing polyester reinforced with glass fi ber. • Silver alloy low resistance contacts with high arcing and welding characteristics. • Connection with protected cable clamps until 125A. • Electrolytic treatment against 10 low voltage electrical material Serie A5 low voltage electrical material General characteristics Simple "click" front plate fi xing Front plate designed for Internal and easy fi xing by simple push-in on the external links mounting plate Factory assembled links. Insulated external links protect against direct contact on live parts Metalic shaft Marking Optimal mechanical eff ort transmission
    [Show full text]
  • Surgical and Non-Surgical Management Strategies for Lateral Epicondylitis
    J Orthop Spine Trauma. 2021 March; 7(1): 1-7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jost.v7i1.5958 Review Article Surgical and Non-Surgical Management Strategies for Lateral Epicondylitis Meisam Jafari Kafiabadi 1, Amir Sabaghzadeh1, Farsad Biglari2, Amin Karami3, Mehrdad Sadighi 1,*, Adel Ebrahimpour4 1 Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 2 Orthopedic Surgeon, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 3 Resident, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 4 Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran *Corresponding author: Mehrdad Sadighi; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Tel: +98-9125754616, Email: [email protected] Received: 14 September 2020; Revised: 01 December 2020; Accepted: 12 January 2021 Abstract Lateral epicondylitis (LE) is one of the major causes of elbow pain. Despite being a self-limiting condition, its high incidence can cause a significant socioeconomic burden. Many treatment modalities have been proposed for the treatment, but the optimal strategy is still unknown. In this article, we discuss surgical and non-surgical strategies for the treatment of LE and address the research gaps. Keywords: Exercise Therapy; Lateral Epicondylitis; Tennis Elbow; Treatment Citation: Jafari Kafiabadi M, Sabaghzadeh A, Biglari F, Karami A, Sadighi M, Ebrahimpour A. Surgical and Non-Surgical Management Strategies for Lateral Epicondylitis. J Orthop Spine Trauma 2021; 7(1): 1-7. Background I-A.
    [Show full text]
  • Nebraska Highway 12 Niobrara East & West
    WWelcomeelcome Nebraska Highway 12 Niobrara East & West Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Section 404 Permit Application Public Open House and Public Hearing PPurposeurpose & NNeedeed What is the purpose of the N-12 project? - Provide a reliable roadway - Safely accommodate current and future traffi c levels - Maintain regional traffi c connectivity Why is the N-12 project needed? - Driven by fl ooding - Unreliable roadway, safety concerns, and interruption in regional traffi c connectivity Photo at top: N-12 with no paved shoulder and narrow lane widths Photo at bottom: Maintenance occurring on N-12 PProjectroject RRolesoles Tribal*/Public NDOR (Applicant) Agencies & County Corps » Provide additional or » Respond to the Corps’ » Provide technical input » Comply with Clean new information requests for information and consultation Water Act » Provide new reasonable » Develop and submit » Make the Section 7(a) » Comply with National alternatives a Section 404 permit decision (National Park Service) Environmental Policy Act application » Question accuracy and » Approvals and reviews » Conduct tribal adequacy of information » Planning, design, and that adhere to federal, consultation construction of Applied- state, or local laws and » Coordinate with NDOR, for Project requirements agencies, and public » Implementation of » Make a decision mitigation on NDOR’s permit application * Conducted through government-to-government consultation. AApplied-forpplied-for PProjectroject (Alternative A7 - Base of Bluff s Elevated Alignment) Attribute
    [Show full text]
  • Requirements for Welding and Brazing Filler Materials
    LANL Engineering Standards Manual ISD 341-2 Chapter 13, Welding & Joining GWS 1-07 – Consumable Materials Rev. 1, 10/27/06 Attachment 1, Requirements for Welding & Brazing Filler Materials REQUIREMENTS FOR WELDING AND BRAZING FILLER MATERIALS 1.0 PROCUREMENT Electrodes and filler materials purchased for use at LANL shall be manufactured in accordance with the appropriate ASME SFA or AWS welding filler metal specification. The procurement document shall require the manufacturer or vendor to supply a Certified Material Test Report (CMTR) for the filler materials. It shall further require that the CMTR shall include the actual results of all chemical analyses, mechanical tests, and examinations relative to requirements of the applicable code and the material specification. Filler materials to be used for Safety Significant or Safety Class SSCs (ML-1 & ML-2) shall be procured with a Certified Material Test Report (CMTR) in accordance with ASME SFA or AWS codes with actual chemical composition and mechanical properties along with any additional testing requirements specified in the purchase document. The Certificate of Compliance (C of C) is not sufficient unless LANL WPA approves. A C of C may be substituted for a CMTR if permitted by the engineering specification. The Certificate of Compliance (C of C) shall state that the welding filler material was manufactured in accordance with the requirements of the appropriate filler metal specification for each filler metal type, size, heat, and lot number. This requirement may be fulfilled by the manufacturer or vendor labeling each container with a statement that the material conforms to the appropriate ASME SFA or AWS specification.
    [Show full text]
  • At Least Seven Distinct Rotavirus Genotype Constellations in Bats with Evidence Of
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.13.250464; this version posted October 26, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 At least seven distinct rotavirus genotype constellations in bats with evidence of 2 reassortment and zoonotic transmissions 3 4 Ceren Simseka; Victor Max Cormanb,o; Hermann Ulrich Everlingc; Alexander N. 5 Lukashevd; Andrea Rascheb,o; Gael Darren Magangae,f; Tabea Bingeri; Daan Jansena; 6 Leen Bellera; Ward Debouttea; Florian Gloza-Rauschg; Antje Seebens-Hoyerg; Stoian 7 Yordanovh; Augustina Sylverkeni,j; Samuel Oppongj; Yaw Adu Sarkodiej; Peter Vallok; 8 Eric M. Leroyl; Mathieu Bourgarelm,n,; Kwe Claude Yindaa*; Marc Van Ransta; Christian 9 Drostenb,o; Jan Felix Drexlerb,o; Jelle Matthijnssensa 10 11 a KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and 12 Transplantation, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Leuven, Belgium 13 b Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member 14 of Freie Universität Berlin, Humbolt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 15 Institute of Virology, 10117 Berlin, Germany 16 c Institute of Virology, University of Bonn Medical Centre, Bonn, Germany 17 d Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia 18 e Centre International de Recherches Médicales de Franceville, Franceville, Gabon 19 f Université des Sciences et Technique de Masuku, Institut National d’Agronomie et de 20 Biotechnologies, Franceville, Gabon 21 g Noctalis, Centre for Bat Protection and Information, Bad Segeberg, Germany 22 h Forestry Board Directorate of Strandja Natural Park, Malko Tarnovo, Bulgaria 23 i Kumasi Centre for Collaborative Research in Tropical Medicine (KCCR), Kumasi, 24 Ghana 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.13.250464; this version posted October 26, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Temporary Assignment in Higher Classification
    Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Governor's Office Subject: Number: Temporary Assignment in Higher 525.4 Amended Classification Date: By Direction of: May 3, 2013 Kelly Powell Logan, Secretary of Administration Contact Agency: Office of Administration, Office for Human Resources Management, Bureau of Classification and Compensation, Telephone 717.787.8838 This directive establishes policy, responsibilities, and procedures for controlling the use of temporary assignments in higher classifications and for processing payments to compensate employees who receive such assignments. Marginal dots are excluded due to major changes. 1. PURPOSE. To establish policy, responsibilities, and procedures for controlling the use of temporary assignments in higher classifications. 2. SCOPE. This directive applies to all employees in departments, boards, commissions, and councils (hereinafter referred to as “agencies”) under the Governor's jurisdiction temporarily assigned to the work of a position in a higher classification. 3. OBJECTIVES. a. Provide policy for the assignment of employees to temporarily work in a higher classification. b. Set forth eligibility criteria for receiving out-of-classification pay. c. Promulgate out-of-classification pay rules. d. Authorize the pay for employees temporarily working in a higher classification. Management Directive 525.4 Amended Page 1 of 8 4. DEFINITIONS. a. Employees' Regular Biweekly Salary/Hourly Rate. The biweekly salary/hourly rate the employee earns in his/her regular classification/position. b. Full day. Seven and one-half or eight hour day. Note that this may be any continuous seven and one-half or eight hour period including both hours within or outside of an employee’s regularly scheduled workday, or any combination thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • US SAILING FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM & PROCEDURES MANUAL 2013—2016 Effective—1 January 2013
    [Type text ] [Type text ] [Type text ] US SAILING FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM & PROCEDURES MANUAL 2013—2016 Effective—1 January 2013 Originally Published—May 2013 US Sailing Member of the PO Box 1260 15 Maritime Drive Portsmouth, RI 02871-0907 Phone: 1-401-683-0800 / Toll free: 1-800-USSAIL - (1-800-877-2451) Fax: 401-683-0840 E-Mail: [email protected] International Paralympic Committee Roger H S trube, MD – A pril 20 13 1 ROGE R H STRUBE, MD – APRIL 2013 [Type text ] [Type text ] [Type text ] Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 6 Appendix to Introduction – Glossary of Medical Terminology .......................................................................... 7 Joint Movement Definitions: ........................................................................................................................... 7 Neck ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 Shoulder .................................................................................................................................................. 7 Elbow ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 Wrist ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 8-28-2015 Luckman Rep Plot.Lw5 Technical Director: Andy Barth Updated by Hilda Kane [email protected] [email protected]
    CHEAT SHEET 8/31/15 Page 1 of 4 MAINSTAGE REP PLOT 8-28-2015 Luckman Rep Plot.lw5 Technical Director: Andy Barth Updated by Hilda Kane [email protected] [email protected] THIS PRINTOUT IS LIMITED TO: Rep Plot ALL This is not a hookup or instrument schedule. Do not assume items on the same line relate to each other. Chan Purpose Color & Gobo Position Chan Purpose Color & Gobo Position (1) A1 R51 2ND AP (47) WASH 1 R26 2ND AP (2) A2 R51 2ND AP 1ST AP (3) A3 R51 2ND AP (48) WASH 2 R80 2ND AP (4) A4 R51 2ND AP 1ST AP (5) A5 R51 2ND AP (51) DOWN 1 R22 1 ELECTRIC (6) A6 R51 2ND AP (52) DOWN 1 R22 1 ELECTRIC (7) A7 R51 2ND AP (53) DOWN 1 R22 1 ELECTRIC (8) A8 R51 2ND AP (54) DOWN 1 R22 2 ELECTRIC (9) A9 R51 2ND AP (55) DOWN 1 R22 2 ELECTRIC (10) A10 R51 2ND AP (56) DOWN 1 R22 2 ELECTRIC (11) A11 R51 1ST AP (57) DOWN 1 R22 3 ELECTRIC (12) A12 R51 1ST AP (58) DOWN 1 R22 3 ELECTRIC (13) A13 R51 1ST AP (59) DOWN 1 R22 3 ELECTRIC (14) A14 R51 1ST AP (60) DOWN 1 R22 4 ELECTRIC (15) A15 R51 1ST AP (61) DOWN 1 R22 4 ELECTRIC (16) A16 R51 1 ELECTRIC (62) DOWN 1 R22 4 ELECTRIC (17) A17 R51 1 ELECTRIC (63) DOWN 1 R22 4A ELECTRIC (18) A18 R51 1 ELECTRIC (64) DOWN 1 R22 4A ELECTRIC (19) A19 R51 1 ELECTRIC (65) DOWN 1 R22 4A ELECTRIC (20) A20 R51 2 ELECTRIC (71) DOWN 2 R80 1 ELECTRIC (21) A21 R51 2 ELECTRIC (72) DOWN 2 R80 1 ELECTRIC (22) A22 R51 2 ELECTRIC (73) DOWN 2 R80 1 ELECTRIC (23) A23 R51 2 ELECTRIC (74) DOWN 2 R80 2 ELECTRIC (24) A24 R51 3 ELECTRIC (75) DOWN 2 R80 2 ELECTRIC (25) A25 R51 3 ELECTRIC (76) DOWN 2 R80 2 ELECTRIC (26) A26 R51 3 ELECTRIC (77) DOWN 2 R80 3 ELECTRIC (27) A27 R51 3 ELECTRIC (78) DOWN 2 R80 3 ELECTRIC (28) A28 R51 4 ELECTRIC (79) DOWN 2 R80 3 ELECTRIC (29) A29 R51 4 ELECTRIC (80) DOWN 2 R80 4 ELECTRIC (30) A30 R51 4 ELECTRIC (81) DOWN 2 R80 4 ELECTRIC (31) A31 R51 4 ELECTRIC (82) DOWN 2 R80 4 ELECTRIC (41) APRON R51 1ST AP (83) DOWN 2 R80 4A ELECTRIC (42) APRON ..
    [Show full text]
  • USCIS Employment Authorization Documents
    USCIS Employment Authorization Documents March 19, 2018 Fiscal Year 2017 Report to Congress U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Message from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services March 19, 2018 I am pleased to present the following report, “USCIS Employment Authorization Documents,” which has been prepared by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). This report was compiled pursuant to language set forth in Senate Report 114-264 accompanying the Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act (P.L. 115-31). Pursuant to congressional requirements, this report is being provided to the following Members of Congress: The Honorable John R. Carter Chairman, House Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security The Honorable Lucille Roybal-Allard Ranking Member, House Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security The Honorable John Boozman Chairman, Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security The Honorable Jon Tester Ranking Member, Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security I am pleased to respond to any questions you may have. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (202) 272-1000 or the Department’s Acting Chief Financial Officer, Stacy Marcott, at (202) 447-5751. Sincerely, L. Francis Cissna Director U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services i Executive Summary This report provides the information requested by the Senate Appropriations Committee regarding the number of employment authorization documents (EAD) issued annually from FY 2012 through FY 2015, the validity period of those EADs, and the policies governing validity periods of EADs. As requested, the report provides details on the number and type of EAD approvals by USCIS. From FYs 2012–2015, USCIS approved more than 6 million EADs in multiple categories.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Effective Features and Classifiers for Short Term Rainfall Forecast Using Rough Sets Maximum Frequency Weighted Feature Reduction Technique
    CIT. Journal of Computing and Information Technology, Vol. 24, No. 2, June 2016, 181–194 181 doi: 10.20532/cit.2016.1002715 Identifying Effective Features and Classifiers for Short Term Rainfall Forecast Using Rough Sets Maximum Frequency Weighted Feature Reduction Technique Sudha Mohankumar1 and Valarmathi Balasubramanian2 1Information Technology Department, School of Information Technology and Engineering, VIT University, Vellore, India 2Software and Systems Engineering Department, School of Information Technology and Engineering, VIT University, Vellore, India Precise rainfall forecasting is a common challenge Information systems → Information retrieval → Re- across the globe in meteorological predictions. As trieval tasks and goals → Clustering and classification; rainfall forecasting involves rather complex dy- Applied computing → Operations research → Fore- namic parameters, an increasing demand for novel casting approaches to improve the forecasting accuracy has heightened. Recently, Rough Set Theory (RST) has at- Keywords: rainfall prediction, rough set, maximum tracted a wide variety of scientific applications and is frequency, optimal reduct, core features and accuracy extensively adopted in decision support systems. Al- though there are several weather prediction techniques in the existing literature, identifying significant input for modelling effective rainfall prediction is not ad- dressed in the present mechanisms. Therefore, this in- 1. Introduction vestigation has examined the feasibility of using rough set based feature selection and data mining methods, Rainfall forecast serves as an important di- namely Naïve Bayes (NB), Bayesian Logistic Re- saster prevention tool. Agricultural yields and gression (BLR), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), J48, agriculture based industrial development more Classification and Regression Tree (CART), Random often than not, rely on natural water resources Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM), to forecast rainfall.
    [Show full text]