DOCSLIB.ORG

(E.3.2-25) Medium-Sized Mammal Resources in The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(E.3.2-25) Medium-Sized Mammal Resources in The Medium-Sized Mammal Resources in the Hells Canyon Study Area Natalie J. S. Turley Wildlife Technician Anthonie M. A. Holthuijzen Wildlife Ecologist Technical Report Appendix E.3.2-25 January 2001 Revised July 2003 Hells Canyon Complex FERC No. 1971 Copyright © 2003 by Idaho Power Company Idaho Power Company Medium-Sized Mammal Resources TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................. i List of Tables..................................................................................................................................iii List of Figures ................................................................................................................................iii List of Appendices .........................................................................................................................iii Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 2 2. Study Area.................................................................................................................................. 3 2.1. Location............................................................................................................................. 3 2.2. Physiography..................................................................................................................... 4 2.3. Land Features and Geology............................................................................................... 5 2.4. Soils................................................................................................................................... 5 2.5. Climate .............................................................................................................................. 6 2.6. Vegetation ......................................................................................................................... 6 2.7. Land Use ........................................................................................................................... 8 2.8. Plant Operations ................................................................................................................ 8 3. Methods...................................................................................................................................... 9 3.1. Survey Technique.............................................................................................................. 9 3.2. Sampling Design ............................................................................................................. 10 3.3. Survey Protocol............................................................................................................... 11 3.4. Data Analysis .................................................................................................................. 11 4. Results ...................................................................................................................................... 11 5. Discussion ................................................................................................................................ 12 6. Summary and Conclusions....................................................................................................... 14 Hells Canyon Complex Page i Medium-Sized Mammal Resources Idaho Power Company 7. Acknowledgments.................................................................................................................... 15 8. Literature Cited ........................................................................................................................ 15 Page ii Hells Canyon Complex Idaho Power Company Medium-Sized Mammal Resources LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Medium-sized mammals potentially occurring in the Hells Canyon Study Area and vicinity. .................................................................................................. 21 Table 2. Cover-types (acreage and percentages) present in the Hells Canyon Study Area. ...................................................................................................................... 22 Table 3. Number of surveys conducted in spring, summer, fall, and winter in upland and riparian habitats, Hells Canyon Study Area, 1995–1999. .................. 23 Table 4. Observations of medium-sized mammals during point-count surveys, Hells Canyon Study Area, 1995–1999.................................................................. 24 Table 5. Red squirrel density (number/ha) by cover-type and season, Hells Canyon Study Area, 1995–1999......................................................................................... 24 Table 6. Medium-sized mammal densities (n/ha) along various reaches of the Snake River, Idaho. ............................................................................................... 25 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Location of the Hells Canyon Study Area and mammal survey points. ............... 27 Figure 2. Köppen climate diagrams for the Weiser, Richland, Brownlee, and Lewiston weather stations, Hells Canyon Study Area, Idaho–Oregon border. ................................................................................................................... 29 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix 1. Criteria and definitions used to identify cover-types in the Hells Canyon Study Area............................................................................................................. 31 Hells Canyon Complex Page iii Idaho Power Company Medium-Sized Mammal Resources ABSTRACT Idaho Power Company (IPC) investigated the medium-sized mammal community in the Hells Canyon Study Area between 1995 and 1999. The objective was to determine the presence and relative abundance of these animals. Four-hundred forty-two points were established and monitored. Of these, 288 were riparian points and 154 were upland points. Surveys were conducted during four seasonal periods: spring (May), summer (June), fall (late September through early October), and winter (late January). Five species were observed during point-count surveys. The red squirrel (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus) was the most common species, followed by coyote (Canis latrans), mountain cottontail (Sylvilagus nuttallii), badger (Taxidea taxus), and beaver (Castor canadensis). Fifteen other medium-sized mammal species were observed incidental to other IPC studies. The density of medium-sized mammals that serve as prey for coyotes, raptors, and other predators was very low for upland and riparian habitats, with the exception of red squirrel in riparian habitats. The black-tailed jackrabbit (Lepus californicus) was only observed on one occasion. Even though the mountain cottontail was observed throughout the study area, densities were low (< 0.01/ha in upland and riparian habitat) compared with their densities in other areas along the Snake River (C.J. Strike: 0.02 to 0.34/ha, Sunderman et al. 1998; Hagerman Valley: 0.05 to 0.18/ha, Holthuijzen 1995). The red squirrel was observed in riparian and wooded upland cover-types in moderately high densities throughout the study area. The highest density was reported for fall (1.24/ha), which was significantly higher than those for summer (0.24/ha), winter (0.18/ha), or spring (0.15/ha). In general, highest densities were observed in the Forested Wetland (0.17 to 1.52/ha) and Forested Upland (0.00 to 1.37/ha) cover-types. However, significant differences were found only in fall when the Forested Wetland cover-type had higher densities than the Mountain Shrub cover-type did. Most species—including red squirrel, mountain cottontail, coyote, bobcat (Lynx rufus), and raccoon (Procyon lotor)—were observed throughout the study area. However, several species had more restricted distributions. The mink (Mustela vison) and muskrat (Ondatra zibethica) were limited by the lack of extensive riparian habitats throughout most of the study area. The red fox (Vulpes vulpes) was only observed in the southern portion of the study area along Brownlee Reservoir and above Cobb Rapids. Red fox are most abundant in areas with a mixture of croplands, grasslands, and woodlands (Verts and Carraway 1998). Thus, the absence of agriculture in the northern portion of the study area may explain the red fox distribution. Hells Canyon Complex Page 1 Medium-Sized Mammal Resources Idaho Power Company 1. INTRODUCTION Medium-sized mammals serve as prey, animals for hunting, indicators of habitat quality, and models for ecological research (Chapman and Willner 1986). A diverse group of animals— including lagomorphs, rodents, and carnivores with varied functional roles in ecosystems—are classified as medium-sized mammals. Twenty-seven medium-sized mammal species may occur in the Hells Canyon Study Area (Table 1). This report focuses on information about medium-sized mammals of the orders Lagomorpha and Rodentia collected during point-count surveys. Information on the furbearer and carnivore community is found in another report focusing on data collected with scent-station surveys and camera detection systems (Edelmann 2001). In general, lagomorphs have high reproductive rates and are short-lived. Population levels are regulated by mortality and dispersal. The quality
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Characterization of Ecoregions of Idaho
    1 0 . C o l u m b i a P l a t e a u 1 3 . C e n t r a l B a s i n a n d R a n g e Ecoregion 10 is an arid grassland and sagebrush steppe that is surrounded by moister, predominantly forested, mountainous ecoregions. It is Ecoregion 13 is internally-drained and composed of north-trending, fault-block ranges and intervening, drier basins. It is vast and includes parts underlain by thick basalt. In the east, where precipitation is greater, deep loess soils have been extensively cultivated for wheat. of Nevada, Utah, California, and Idaho. In Idaho, sagebrush grassland, saltbush–greasewood, mountain brush, and woodland occur; forests are absent unlike in the cooler, wetter, more rugged Ecoregion 19. Grazing is widespread. Cropland is less common than in Ecoregions 12 and 80. Ecoregions of Idaho The unforested hills and plateaus of the Dissected Loess Uplands ecoregion are cut by the canyons of Ecoregion 10l and are disjunct. 10f Pure grasslands dominate lower elevations. Mountain brush grows on higher, moister sites. Grazing and farming have eliminated The arid Shadscale-Dominated Saline Basins ecoregion is nearly flat, internally-drained, and has light-colored alkaline soils that are Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and America into 15 ecological regions. Level II divides the continent into 52 regions Literature Cited: much of the original plant cover. Nevertheless, Ecoregion 10f is not as suited to farming as Ecoregions 10h and 10j because it has thinner soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuttall's Cottontail (Sylvilagus Nuttallii) in British Columbia'', Prepared by the BC Nuttall's Cottontail Working Group
    PROPOSED Species at Risk Act Management Plan Series Adopted under Section 69 of SARA Management Plan for the Nuttall’s Cottontail nuttallii subspecies (Sylvilagus nuttallii nuttallii) in Canada Nuttall’s Cottontail nuttallii subspecies 2014 Recommended citation: Environment Canada. 2014. Management Plan for the Nuttall’s Cottontail nuttallii subspecies (Sylvilagus nuttallii nuttallii) in Canada. Species at Risk Act Management Plan Series. Environment Canada, Ottawa. III p. + Annex. For copies of the management plan or for additional information on species at risk, including the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) Status Reports, residence descriptions, action plans, and other related recovery documents, please visit the Species at Risk (SAR) Public Registry (www.sararegistry.gc.ca). Cover illustration: David Nagorsen Également disponible en français sous le titre « Plan de gestion du lapin de Nuttall de la sous-espèce nuttallii (Sylvilagus nuttallii nuttallii) au Canada [Proposition] » © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of the Environment, 2014. All rights reserved. ISBN Catalogue no. Content (photos excluded) may be used without permission, with appropriate credit to the source. MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE NUTTALL’S COTTONTAIL NUTTALLII SUBSPECIES (Sylvilagus nuttallii nuttallii) IN CANADA 2014 Under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk (1996), the federal, provincial, and territorial governments agreed to work together on legislation, programs, and policies to protect wildlife species at risk throughout Canada. In the spirit of cooperation of the Accord, the Government of British Columbia has given permission to the Government of Canada to adopt the “Management Plan for the Nuttall’s Cottontail (Sylvilagus nuttallii) in British Columbia” (Part 2) under section 69 of the Species at Risk Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Wolverines in Idaho 2014–2019
    Management Plan for the Conservation of Wolverines in Idaho 2014–2019 Prepared by IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME July 2014 2 Idaho Department of Fish & Game Recommended Citation: Idaho Department of Fish and Game. 2014. Management plan for the conservation of wolverines in Idaho. Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise, USA. Idaho Department of Fish and Game – Wolverine Planning Team: Becky Abel – Regional Wildlife Diversity Biologist, Southeast Region Bryan Aber – Regional Wildlife Biologist, Upper Snake Region Scott Bergen PhD – Senior Wildlife Research Biologist, Statewide, Pocatello William Bosworth – Regional Wildlife Biologist, Southwest Region Rob Cavallaro – Regional Wildlife Diversity Biologist, Upper Snake Region Rita D Dixon PhD – State Wildlife Action Plan Coordinator, Headquarters Diane Evans Mack – Regional Wildlife Diversity Biologist, McCall Subregion Sonya J Knetter – Wildlife Diversity Program GIS Analyst, Headquarters Zach Lockyer – Regional Wildlife Biologist, Southeast Region Michael Lucid – Regional Wildlife Diversity Biologist, Panhandle Region Joel Sauder PhD – Regional Wildlife Diversity Biologist, Clearwater Region Ben Studer – Web and Digital Communications Lead, Headquarters Leona K Svancara PhD – Spatial Ecology Program Lead, Headquarters Beth Waterbury – Team Leader & Regional Wildlife Diversity Biologist, Salmon Region Craig White PhD – Regional Wildlife Manager, Southwest Region Ross Winton – Regional Wildlife Diversity Biologist, Magic Valley Region Additional copies: Additional copies can be downloaded from the Idaho Department of Fish and Game website at fishandgame.idaho.gov/wolverine-conservation-plan Front Cover Photo: Composite photo: Wolverine photo by AYImages; background photo of the Beaverhead Mountains, Lemhi County, Idaho by Rob Spence, Greater Yellowstone Wolverine Program, Wildlife conservation Society. Back Cover Photo: Release of Wolverine F4, a study animal from the Central Idaho Winter Recreation/Wolverine Project, from a live trap north of McCall, 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Cottontail Rabbits
    Cottontail Rabbits Biology of Cottontail Rabbits (Sylvilagus spp.) as Prey of Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) in the Western United States Photo Credit, Sky deLight Credit,Photo Sky Cottontail Rabbits Biology of Cottontail Rabbits (Sylvilagus spp.) as Prey of Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) in the Western United States U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Regions 1, 2, 6, and 8 Western Golden Eagle Team Front Matter Date: November 13, 2017 Disclaimer The reports in this series have been prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Western Golden Eagle Team (WGET) for the purpose of proactively addressing energy-related conservation needs of golden eagles in Regions 1, 2, 6, and 8. The team was composed of Service personnel, sometimes assisted by contractors or outside cooperators. The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Suggested Citation Hansen, D.L., G. Bedrosian, and G. Beatty. 2017. Biology of cottontail rabbits (Sylvilagus spp.) as prey of golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) in the western United States. Unpublished report prepared by the Western Golden Eagle Team, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Available online at: https://ecos.fws.gov/ServCat/Reference/Profile/87137 Acknowledgments This report was authored by Dan L. Hansen, Geoffrey Bedrosian, and Greg Beatty. The authors are grateful to the following reviewers (in alphabetical order): Katie Powell, Charles R. Preston, and Hillary White. Cottontails—i Summary Cottontail rabbits (Sylvilagus spp.; hereafter, cottontails) are among the most frequently identified prey in the diets of breeding golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) in the western United States (U.S.).
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Field Ornithologists the Colorado Field Ornithologists' Quarterly
    Journal of the Colorado Field Ornithologists The Colorado Field Ornithologists' Quarterly VOL. 36, NO. 1 Journal of the Colorado Field Ornithologists January 2002 Vol. 36, No. 1 Journal of the Colorado Field Ornithologists January 2002 TABLE OF C ONTENTS A LETTER FROM THE E DITOR..............................................................................................2 2002 CONVENTION IN DURANGO WITH KENN KAUFMANN...................................................3 CFO BOARD MEETING MINUTES: 1 DECEMBER 2001........................................................4 TREE-NESTING HABITAT OF PURPLE MARTINS IN COLORADO.................................................6 Richard T. Reynolds, David P. Kane, and Deborah M. Finch OLIN SEWALL PETTINGILL, JR.: AN APPRECIATION...........................................................14 Paul Baicich MAMMALS IN GREAT HORNED OWL PELLETS FROM BOULDER COUNTY, COLORADO............16 Rebecca E. Marvil and Alexander Cruz UPCOMING CFO FIELD TRIPS.........................................................................................23 THE SHRIKES OF DEARING ROAD, EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO 1993-2001....................24 Susan H. Craig RING-BILLED GULLS FEEDING ON RUSSIAN-OLIVE FRUIT...................................................32 Nicholas Komar NEWS FROM THE C OLORADO BIRD R ECORDS COMMITTEE (JANUARY 2002).........................35 Tony Leukering NEWS FROM THE FIELD: THE SUMMER 2001 REPORT (JUNE - JULY)...................................36 Christopher L. Wood and Lawrence S. Semo COLORADO F IELD O
    [Show full text]
  • Clearwater Rapid Watershed Assessment
    Clearwater - 17060306 Idaho 8 Digit Hydrologic Unit Profile December 2006 Tensed Farmington Clearwater - 17060306 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit LATAHLATAH Location Map Potlatch Bovill WHITMAN WHITMAN Deary (Washington) (Washington) Elk River Troy Moscow CLEARWATERCLEARWATER Kendrick Juliaetta Genesee Pierce Clearwater Peck Orofino Clarkston 17060306 Lapwai Culdesac Weippe Lewiston Asotin Reubens LEWISLEWIS Kamiah Craigmont Winchester Nezperce Kooskia Ferdinand NEZNEZ Stites PERCEPERCE Cottonwood !COEUR d ALENE MOSCOW! IDAHOIDAHO Grangeville LEWISTON! !REXBURG CALDWELL! !BOISE NAMPA! !IDAHO FALLS : BLACKFOOT ! !POCATELLO 0 5 10 15 20 25 TWIN! FALLS Miles The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326W, Whitten Building, 14 th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 1 Clearwater - 17060306 Idaho 8 Digit Hydrologic Unit Profile December 2006 Introduction The Clearwater 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) subbasin is 1,503,992 acres. Clearwater and Nez Perce counties each account for approximately 24 percent of the subbasin. Twenty two percent of the subbasin is in Latah County, 18 percent in Lewis County, 13 percent in Idaho County and less than 0.5% in Whitman County, Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix Lagomorph Species: Geographical Distribution and Conservation Status
    Appendix Lagomorph Species: Geographical Distribution and Conservation Status PAULO C. ALVES1* AND KLAUS HACKLÄNDER2 Lagomorph taxonomy is traditionally controversy, and as a consequence the number of species varies according to different publications. Although this can be due to the conservative characteristic of some morphological and genetic traits, like general shape and number of chromosomes, the scarce knowledge on several species is probably the main reason for this controversy. Also, some species have been discovered only recently, and from others we miss any information since they have been first described (mainly in pikas). We struggled with this difficulty during the work on this book, and decide to include a list of lagomorph species (Table 1). As a reference, we used the recent list published by Hoffmann and Smith (2005) in the “Mammals of the world” (Wilson and Reeder, 2005). However, to make an updated list, we include some significant published data (Friedmann and Daly 2004) and the contribu- tions and comments of some lagomorph specialist, namely Andrew Smith, John Litvaitis, Terrence Robinson, Andrew Smith, Franz Suchentrunk, and from the Mexican lagomorph association, AMCELA. We also include sum- mary information about the geographical range of all species and the current IUCN conservation status. Inevitably, this list still contains some incorrect information. However, a permanently updated lagomorph list will be pro- vided via the World Lagomorph Society (www.worldlagomorphsociety.org). 1 CIBIO, Centro de Investigaça˜o em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos and Faculdade de Ciˆencias, Universidade do Porto, Campus Agrário de Vaira˜o 4485-661 – Vaira˜o, Portugal 2 Institute of Wildlife Biology and Game Management, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Gregor-Mendel-Str.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of Part of the Snake River Canyon and Adjacent Areas in Northeastern Oregon and Western Idaho
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Tracy Lowell Vallier for the Ph.D. in Geology (Name) (Degree) (Major) Date thesis is presented May 1, 1967 Title THE GEOLOGY OF PART OF THE SNAKE RIVER CANYON AND ADJACENT AREAS IN NORTHEAXERN OREGON AND WESTERN IDAHO Abstract approved Redacted for Privacy (Major professor) The mapped area lies between the Wallowa Mountains of northeastern Oregon and the Seven Devils Mountains of western Idaho. Part of the Snake River canyon is in- cluded. A composite stratigraphic section includes at least 30,000 feet of strata. Pre- Tertiary and Tertiary strata are separated by a profound unconformity. Pre -Tertiary layered rocks are mostly Permian and Triassic volcani- clastic and volcanic flow rocks. At least four pre -Ter- tiary intrusive suites occur. Tertiary rocks are Miocene and Pliocene plateau basalts. Quaternary glacial materi- als and stream deposits locally mantle the older rocks. Permian ( ?) rocks of the Windy Ridge Formation are the oldest rocks and consist of 2,000 to 3,000 feet of keratophyre, quartz keratophyre, and keratophric pyro- clastic rocks. Unconformably ( ?) overlying the Windy Ridge Formation are 8,000 to 10,000 feet of volcaniclastic rocks and minor volcanic flow rocks of the Hunsaker Creek Formation of Middle Permian (Leonardian and Wordian) age. Spilitic flow rocks of the Kleinschmidt Volcanics are interlayered with and in part overlie the Hunsaker Creek Formation and comprise a sequence about 2,000 to 3,000 feet thick. The Paleozoic layered rocks were intruded by the Holbrook - Irondyke intrusives, composed of keratophyre porphyry, quartz keratophyre porphyry, diabase, and gab- bro.
    [Show full text]
  • Life History Account for Nuttall's Cottontail
    California Wildlife Habitat Relationships System California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Interagency Wildlife Task Group NUTTALL'S COTTONTAIL Sylvilagus nuttallii Family: LEPORIDAE Order: LAGOMORPHA Class: MAMMALIA M046 Written by: G. Hoefler Reviewed by: H. Shellhammer Edited by: R. Duke Updated by: CWHR Program Staff, February 2008 DISTRIBUTION, ABUNDANCE, AND SEASONALITY Nuttall's cottontail is found on the east slopes of the Sierra Nevada and the Cascades from Siskiyou and Modoc cos. south through the Great Basin to southern Inyo Co. (Orr 1940), and probably to San Bernardino Co. Primarily an animal of rocky, sage-covered hills and canyons, it is common in sagebrush, fairly common in sparse, montane riparian habitats, and uncommon in subalpine conifer, pinyon juniper, juniper, and alpine dwarf-shrub habitats. Altitudinal range in California is from 1372 to 3200 m(4500 to 10,500 ft) (Orr 1940, Ingles 1965, Chapman 1975). SPECIFIC HABITAT REQUIREMENTS Feeding: Prefers grasses, but lives most of the year on sagebrush, and will eat juniper berries. Mountain cottontail usually feeds in the shelter of brush, or in clearings a few meters from cover. Cover: Rabbits living in dense sagebrush or riparian growth probably spend most of their time above ground. Those inhabiting sparse, or open, habitats rely on crevices in rocks, or burrows, for cover (Orr 1937). Reproduction: Nests are found in dense vegetation, crevices, rockpiles, or burrows. The nest is a cup-like cavity lined with fur and dried grass. The top of the nest is covered with fur, grass, and small sticks (Orr 1940, Chapman 1975). Water: No data found.
    [Show full text]
  • Phacelia Lyallii and Physaria Didymocarpa Var
    FIELD INVESTIGATIONS OF TWO SENSITIVE PLANT SPECIES ON THE SALMON NATIONAL FOREST: PHACELIA LYALLII AND PHYSARIA DIDYMOCARPA VAR. LYRATA by Robert K. Moseley, Michael Mancuso and Steven L. Caicco Natural Heritage Section Nongame/Endangered Wildlife Program Bureau of Wildlife December 1990 Idaho Department of Fish and Game 600 South Walnut, P.O. Box 25 Boise, Idaho 83707 Jerry M. Conley, Director Cooperative Challenge Cost-share Project Salmon National Forest Idaho Department of Fish and Game ABSTRACT Field investigations of Phacelia lyallii (Lyall's phacelia) and Physaria didymocarpa var. lyrata (Salmon twin bladderpod) were conducted on the Salmon National Forest by the Idaho Department of Fish and Game's Natural Heritage Program. The investigations were a cooperative Challenge Cost-share project between the Department and the Salmon NF. Lyall's phacelia is endemic to the northern Rocky Mountains, occurring on the southern edge of its range in Idaho, while Salmon twin bladderpod is restricted to the Salmon area. Both plants are on the Intermountain Region's Sensitive Plant Species List. Previous to 1990, only three populations of Lyall's phacelia were known from the Salmon NF, two in the Beaverhead Mountains east of Salmon and one in the northern Lemhi Range. Inventories this year did not expand on this pattern much, discovering only three new populations in the Beaverhead's; this despite considerable searches in the Beaverhead Mountains, Lemhi Range, and Salmon River Mountains. Less than 2,000 plants are known from Idaho. No clear threats to long-term viability were apparent, but the highly localized nature of the populations make them vulnerable to extirpation from habitat destroying activities, such as mining.
    [Show full text]
  • Or Wilderness Protection in the Blue Mountain Ecoregion Have Been Identified by the Nature Conservancy As Vital to Protect Biodiversity in the Area
    172 OREGON WILD Neither Cascades nor Rockies, but With Attributes of Both Blue Mountains Ecoregion xtending from Oregon’s East Cascades Slopes and Foothills to the from 30 to 130 days depending on elevation. The forests are home to Rocky Mountain intersection of Oregon, Idaho and Washington, the 15.3 million acres elk, mule deer, black bear, cougar, bobcat, coyote, beaver, marten, raccoon, fisher, of the Blue Mountains Ecoregion in Oregon are a conglomeration of pileated woodpecker, golden eagle, chickadee and nuthatch, as well as various species Emountain ranges, broad plateaus, sparse valleys, spectacular river canyons of hawks, woodpeckers, owls and songbirds. Wolves, long absent from Oregon, are and deep gorges. The highest point is the Matterhorn that rises to 9,832 making their return to the state in this ecoregion. Individuals from packs reintroduced feet in the Wallowa Mountains. The ecoregion extends into southeastern Washington in nearby Idaho are dispersing into Oregon. Fish species include bull and rainbow and west central Idaho. trout, along with numerous stocks of Pacific salmon species. Most of the mountain ranges in the Blue Mountains Ecoregion are volcanic. The Depending on precipitation, aspect, soil type, elevation, fire history and other Crooked River separates the Maury Mountains from the Ochoco Mountains, which are factors, one generally finds various combinations of Douglas-fir, ponderosa pine, lodge- separated from the Aldrich Mountains by the South Fork John Day River. The Aldrich pole, western larch, juniper and Engelmann spruce throughout the Blue Mountains. Mountains are separated from the Strawberry Mountain Range by Canyon Creek. Beginning approximately at the Lower Deschutes River and rising eastward, the These ranges generally run east-west.
    [Show full text]
  • Redacted for Privacy
    Redacted for privacy The Early Jurassic "Grade Creek conglomerate" has amini- mum thickness of 400 feetand unconformably overlies the Seven Devils Volcanics.Unconformably (?) overlying the conglomerate unit is the "Camp Creek latite" which is 300-400feet thick and Early Jurassic in age.Tectonicly overlying the latite is more than 1,000 feet of gray to black shales and interbedded conglomeraticschists of the Early Jurassic "Brownlee Canyon series." Flows ofMiocene to Early Pliocene Columbia River Basalthave a maximum thickness of 1, 000 feet and upconformably overlie all pre-Tertiaryrocks. Major phases of the Cuddy Mountain intrusive complex are porphyritic granodiorite (200 ± 5 m. y.), hornblende gabbro, and leucocratic quartz diorite in order of decreasing age. Two periods of alteration are present. The first episode altered part ofthe porphyritic granocliorite to a rock that is chemically and mineralogi- cally similar to the albite granites near Sparta, Oregon.The last stage represents hydrothermal alteration related tointrusion of leucocratic quartz diorite. Regional, contact, and dislocation metamorphism are present in this area.All pre-Tertiary stratigraphic units and the porphyritic granodiorite have been subjected to greenschist regional meta- morphism during Middle Jurassic time. The hornblende gabbro and leucocratic quartz diorite are believed to postdate regional meta- morphism. Parts of the porphyritic granodiorite and hornblende gabbro have been contact metamorphosed to the hornblende hornfels facies by the leucocratic quartz
    [Show full text]