Foss. Rec., 21, 171–182, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/fr-21-171-2018 © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Rostrum size differences between Toarcian belemnite battlefields Patrícia Rita, Kenneth De Baets, and Martina Schlott Geozentrum Nordbayern, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany Correspondence: Patrícia Rita (
[email protected]) Received: 20 February 2018 – Revised: 9 May 2018 – Accepted: 14 May 2018 – Published: 7 June 2018 Abstract. Body size changes have been reported across cri- changes in morphological disparity (Dera et al., 2010, 2016). sis intervals. Belemnites – now considered extinct stem- Among these, body size reductions have been reported in decabrachians – have rarely been investigated for this pur- various lineages (Morten and Twitchett, 2009; Martindale pose, and the few studies have resulted in ambiguous out- and Aberhan, 2017; Rodríguez-Tovar et al., 2017). This so- comes. Here we investigate two Toarcian belemnite accumu- called Lilliput effect (Harries and Knorr, 2009) has not only lations in southern Germany from a morphometric point of been reported for the Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event but view with the support of computed tomography data. The also for other extinction events (e.g. Twitchett, 2007; Harries aim of this study is to test whether a difference in size can be and Knorr, 2009; Borths and Ausich, 2010; Rego et al., 2012; observed between the rostra of the two studied samples, from Sogot et al., 2014). However, the evolutionary and ecological individual lineage to community, and which proxy is more importance of the Lilliput effect remains poorly understood.