DOCSLIB.ORG

1–8–10 Vol. 75 No. 5 Friday Jan. 8, 2010 Pages 1013–1268

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1–8–10 Friday Vol. 75 No. 5 Jan. 8, 2010 Pages 1013–1268 VerDate Nov 24 2008 21:04 Jan 07, 2010 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\08JAWS.LOC 08JAWS hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS6 II Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 5 / Friday, January 8, 2010 The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Monday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records PUBLIC Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Subscriptions: Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the regulations of the Administrative Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Committee of the Federal Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 is the exclusive distributor of the official General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and (Toll-Free) Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general FEDERAL AGENCIES applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public Subscriptions: interest. Paper or fiche 202–741–6005 Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions 202–741–6005 Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the issuing agency requests earlier filing. For a list of documents currently on file for public inspection, see www.federalregister.gov. The seal of the National Archives and Records Administration authenticates the Federal Register as the official serial publication established under the Federal Register Act. Under 44 U.S.C. 1507, the contents of the Federal Register shall be judicially noticed. The Federal Register is published in paper and on 24x microfiche. It is also available online at no charge as one of the databases on GPO Access, a service of the U.S. Government Printing Office. The online edition of the Federal Register, www.gpoaccess.gov/ nara, available through GPO Access, is issued under the authority of the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register as the official legal equivalent of the paper and microfiche editions (44 U.S.C. 4101 and 1 CFR 5.10). It is updated by 6 a.m. each day the Federal Register is published and includes both text and graphics from Volume 59, Number 1 (January 2, 1994) forward. For more information about GPO Access, contact the GPO Access User Support Team, call toll free 1-888-293-6498; DC area 202- 512-1530; fax at 202-512-1262; or via e-mail at [email protected]. The Support Team is available between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday–Friday, except official holidays. The annual subscription price for the Federal Register paper edition is $749 plus postage, or $808, plus postage, for a combined Federal Register, Federal Register Index and List of CFR Sections Affected (LSA) subscription; the microfiche edition of the Federal Register including the Federal Register Index and LSA is $165, plus postage. Six month subscriptions are available for one-half the annual rate. The prevailing postal rates will be applied to orders according to the delivery method requested. The price of a single copy of the daily Federal Register, including postage, is based on the number of pages: $11 for an issue containing less than 200 pages; $22 for an issue containing 200 to 400 pages; and $33 for an issue containing more than 400 pages. Single issues of the microfiche edition may be purchased for $3 per copy, including postage. Remit check or money order, made payable to the Superintendent of Documents, or charge to your GPO Deposit Account, VISA, MasterCard, American Express, or Discover. Mail to: U.S. Government Printing Office—New Orders, P.O. Box 979050, St. Louis, MO 63197-9000; or call toll free 1- 866-512-1800, DC area 202-512-1800; or go to the U.S. Government Online Bookstore site, see bookstore.gpo.gov. There are no restrictions on the republication of material appearing in the Federal Register. How To Cite This Publication: Use the volume number and the page number. Example: 75 FR 12345. Postmaster: Send address changes to the Superintendent of Documents, Federal Register, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402, along with the entire mailing label from the last issue received. VerDate Nov 24 2008 21:04 Jan 07, 2010 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\08JAWS.LOC 08JAWS hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS6 III Contents Federal Register Vol. 75, No. 5 Friday, January 8, 2010 Agriculture Department RULES See Food Safety and Inspection Service Energy Conservation Program: See Forest Service Energy Conservation Standards for Certain Consumer NOTICES Products and for Certain Commercial and Industrial Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Equipment, 1122–1178 Submissions, and Approvals, 1026 NOTICES Public Hearings: Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives Bureau Draft Tank Closure and Waste Management NOTICES Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Commerce in Explosives: Site, Richland, WA, 1048 List of Explosive Materials (2009R–18T), 1085–1087 Environmental Protection Agency Centers for Disease Control and Prevention RULES Revisions to the Requirements for Transboundary NOTICES Shipments of Hazardous Wastes between OECD Meetings: Member Countries, the Requirements, etc., 1236–1262 Board of Scientific Counselors, National Center for Injury PROPOSED RULES Prevention and Control, 1062–1063 Proposed Significant New Use Rules on Certain Chemical Clinical Laboratory Improvement Advisory Committee Substances; Reopening of Comment Period, 1024 (CLIAC), 1063 NOTICES Access to Confidential Business Information: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Industrial Economics, Inc., 1053 NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 1053–1057 Submissions, and Approvals, 1059–1060 Environmental Impact Statements; Availability, etc.: Weekly Receipt, 1057 Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board NOTICES Executive Office of the President Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board, 1028– See Presidential Documents 1029 See Trade Representative, Office of United States Coast Guard Farm Credit Administration NOTICES NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Meetings; Sunshine Act, 1057 Submissions, and Approvals, 1068–1069 Cargo Securing Methods for Packages in Transport Vehicles Federal Aviation Administration or Freight Containers, 1070–1071 RULES Airworthiness Directives: Commerce Department General Electric Company (GE) CF34–1A, CF34–3A, and See Industry and Security Bureau CF34–3B Series Turbofan Engines, 1017–1020 See International Trade Administration NOTICES See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Meetings: RTCA Government/Industry Air Traffic Management Drug Enforcement Administration Advisory Committee, 1116–1117 NOTICES Federal Bureau of Investigation Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, NOTICES Submissions, and Approvals, 1083–1084 Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 1084 Education Department NOTICES Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, NOTICES Submissions, and Approvals, 1036–1037 Meetings; Sunshine Act, 1057–1058 Applications for New Awards (Fiscal Year 2010): European Union–United States Atlantis Program, 1044– Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 1048 NOTICES Grants for the Integration of Schools and Mental Health Applications: Systems, 1041–1044 Public Utility District No. 1, Snohomish County, Readiness and Emergency Management for Schools, Washington, 1049–1050 1037–1041 Wausau Paper Printing & Writing, LLC, Wausau Paper Mills, LLC, 1049 Energy Department Environmental Impact Statements; Availability, etc.: See Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Alabama Power Co., 1050 VerDate Nov<24>2008 23:52 Jan 07, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4748 Sfmt 4748 E:\FR\FM\08JACN.SGM 08JACN hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS4 IV Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 5 / Friday, January 8, 2010 / Contents Filings: Housing and Urban Development Department Christian County Generation LLC, 1051 NOTICES Terra–Gen Dixie Valley, LLC, TGP Dixie Development Federal Property Suitable as Facilities to Assist the Company, LLC, New York Canyon, LLC, 1052 Homeless, 1071 Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Co. LLC, 1051–1052 Western Area Power Administration, 1050–1051 Industry and Security Bureau Initial Market-Based Rate Filing: RULES Castle Energy Services, LLC, 1052–1053 Amendments to the Export Administration Regulations: Accession of Albania and Croatia to Formal Membership Federal Highway Administration in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization; NOTICES Correction, 1020–1021 Final Federal Agency Actions on Proposed Highway in California, 1114–1115 Interior Department See Fish and Wildlife Service Federal Railroad Administration See Land Management Bureau RULES See Minerals Management Service Passenger Equipment Safety Standards: See National Park Service Front
Recommended publications
  • Scenes from Aboard the Frigate HMCS Dunver, 1943-1945

    Scenes from Aboard the Frigate HMCS Dunver, 1943-1945

    Canadian Military History Volume 10 Issue 2 Article 6 2001 Through the Camera’s Lens: Scenes from Aboard the Frigate HMCS Dunver, 1943-1945 Cliff Quince Serge Durflinger University of Ottawa, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh Part of the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Quince, Cliff and Durflinger, Serge "Through the Camera’s Lens: Scenes from Aboard the Frigate HMCS Dunver, 1943-1945." Canadian Military History 10, 2 (2001) This Canadian War Museum is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Quince and Durflinger: Scenes from Aboard the HMCS <em>Dunver</em> Cliff Quince and Serge Durflinger he Battle of the Atlantic was the the ship's unofficial photographer until Tlongest and most important February 1945 at which time the navy maritime campaign of the Second World granted him a formal photographer's War. Germany's large and powerful pass. This pass did not make him an submarine fleet menaced the merchant official RCN photographer, since he vessels carrying the essential supplies maintained all his shipboard duties; it upon which depended the survival of merely enabled him to take photos as Great Britain and, ultimately, the he saw fit. liberation of Western Europe. The campaign was also one of the most vicious and Born in Montreal in 1925, Cliff came by his unforgiving of the war, where little quarter was knack for photography honestly.
  • Detailed Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) Risk Assessment

    Detailed Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) Risk Assessment

    GREENLINK MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT- IRELAND APPENDIX J Marine Detailed UXO Risk Assessment P1975_R4500_RevF1 July 2019 Greenlink Interconnector - connecting the power markets in Ireland and Great Britain For more information: W: www.greenlink.ie “The sole responsibility of this publication lies with the author. The European Union is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.” Detailed Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) Risk Assessment Project Name Greenlink Client Intertek Site Address Pembrokeshire, Wales to County Wexford, Ireland Report Reference DA2985-01 Date 15th April 2019 Originator MN Find us on Twitter and Facebook st 1 Line Defence Limited Company No: 7717863 VAT No: 128 8833 79 Unit 3, Maple Park, Essex Road, Hoddesdon, Herts. EN11 0EX www.1stlinedefence.co.uk Tel: +44 (0)1992 245 020 [email protected] Detailed Unexploded Ordnance Risk Assessment Greenlink Cable Route Intertek Executive Summary Description and Location of Study Area The Greenlink project is a proposed subsea and underground cable interconnector, with associated convertor stations, between existing electricity grids in Wales and Ireland. The project is designed to provide significant additional energy interconnection between Ireland, the UK and continental Europe with the aim of delivering increased security of supply, fuel diversity and greater competition. It is also designed to provide additional transmission network capacities, reinforcing the existing electricity grids in south-east Ireland and south Wales. The study area is approximately 160km in length and spans the St George’s Channel, including areas of landfall in Ireland and Wales. Its westernmost section intercepts the Hook Peninsula in County Wexford and the easternmost section incorporates an area of land surrounding Freshwater West Beach in Pembrokeshire.
  • ARMY HEADQUARTERS 14 Feb 55 a SURVEY of ARMY RESEARCH

    ARMY HEADQUARTERS 14 Feb 55 a SURVEY of ARMY RESEARCH

    REPORT NO. 73 HISTORICAL SECTION (G.S.) ARMY HEADQUARTERS 14 Feb 55 A SURVEY OF ARMY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 1939-45 Contents Paragraph Page Organization of Research and Development 1-13 1 ARTILERY EQUIPMENT The "Sexton" (25-pr S.P. Tracked) 14-14 5 40-mm "Bantan" (Lightened Bofors Gun) 18 18 Variable Time Fuze 19-23 6 25-pr Carriage for Upper Register Firing 24-26 8 Sabot Projectiles 27-30 9 20-mm Guns 31-33 10 SMALL ARMS 3" Mortar Projects 34-36 11 Lightened Rifle 37 12 1 Report No. 73 Snipers' Equipment 38-40 13 EXPLOSIVES 41-47 14 MINEFIELD CLEARANCES 48-53 16 BRIDGING 54-57 18 VEHICLES 58-67 19 FLAME THROWERS 68-78 23 SMOKE 79-86 29 CHEMICAL WARFARE 87-98 32 COMMUNICATIONS General 99-100 38 Wireless Set, Canadian, No. 9 101 38 Wireless Set, Canadian, No. 52 102 39 Wireless Set, Canadian No. 19, MK II & III 103 39 Wireless Set, Canadian, No. 29 104-106 39 Other Wireless Sets 107 40 Synthetic Insultant 108-14 40 RADAR General 115-117 41 G.L. Mk IIIc Set 118-126 42 OPERATIONAL RESEARCH 127-145 44 2 Report No. 73 REPORT NO. 73 HISTORICAL SECTION (G.S.) ARMY HEADQUARTERS 14 Feb 55 A SURVEY OF ARMY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 1939-45 1. The declaration of war in 1939 found the Canadian Army without the establishments or organization necessary to carry out scientific research or technical development. This is readily understandable since up to this time, with a few exceptions1, Canadian commitments had not warranted any independent of warlike stores, but largely for their production as well.
  • Ministry of Defence Acronyms and Abbreviations

    Ministry of Defence Acronyms and Abbreviations

    Acronym Long Title 1ACC No. 1 Air Control Centre 1SL First Sea Lord 200D Second OOD 200W Second 00W 2C Second Customer 2C (CL) Second Customer (Core Leadership) 2C (PM) Second Customer (Pivotal Management) 2CMG Customer 2 Management Group 2IC Second in Command 2Lt Second Lieutenant 2nd PUS Second Permanent Under Secretary of State 2SL Second Sea Lord 2SL/CNH Second Sea Lord Commander in Chief Naval Home Command 3GL Third Generation Language 3IC Third in Command 3PL Third Party Logistics 3PN Third Party Nationals 4C Co‐operation Co‐ordination Communication Control 4GL Fourth Generation Language A&A Alteration & Addition A&A Approval and Authorisation A&AEW Avionics And Air Electronic Warfare A&E Assurance and Evaluations A&ER Ammunition and Explosives Regulations A&F Assessment and Feedback A&RP Activity & Resource Planning A&SD Arms and Service Director A/AS Advanced/Advanced Supplementary A/D conv Analogue/ Digital Conversion A/G Air‐to‐Ground A/G/A Air Ground Air A/R As Required A/S Anti‐Submarine A/S or AS Anti Submarine A/WST Avionic/Weapons, Systems Trainer A3*G Acquisition 3‐Star Group A3I Accelerated Architecture Acquisition Initiative A3P Advanced Avionics Architectures and Packaging AA Acceptance Authority AA Active Adjunct AA Administering Authority AA Administrative Assistant AA Air Adviser AA Air Attache AA Air‐to‐Air AA Alternative Assumption AA Anti‐Aircraft AA Application Administrator AA Area Administrator AA Australian Army AAA Anti‐Aircraft Artillery AAA Automatic Anti‐Aircraft AAAD Airborne Anti‐Armour Defence Acronym
  • Atlantic Fleet, It Is the Atlantic

    Atlantic Fleet, It Is the Atlantic

    The Battle of the Atlantic On September 1, 1939 Germany invades Poland. Allies or go on the offensive with deadly submarine Two days later Britain and France declare war and wolf packs and surface raiders of the German the Battle of the Atlantic begins. Over the next five Kriegsmarine. years and eight months a deadly struggle would be fought on the high seas, from the frigid waters "The Battle of the Atlantic was the dominating of the Arctic to the South Atlantic. factor all through the war. Never for one moment could we forget that everything happening At the heart of the conflict was the tonnage war. elsewhere, on land, at sea or in the air depended Britain required a continuous supply of imported ultimately on its outcome." - Winston Churchill war materials to keep on fighting and the Kriegsmarine (German Navy) was tasked with Getting Started preventing the arrival of these goods from across If this is your first time playing Atlantic Fleet, it is the Atlantic. recommended to begin by completing the Training Missions. To do so, simply select Training Missions Atlantic Fleet from the main menu. Atlantic Fleet is a turn-based tactical and strategic simulation of the Battle of the Atlantic. Take Continue with some Single Battles to get a feel for command of surface ships, submarines as well as combat and gunnery. The Battle of the River Plate carrier and land based aircraft in a deadly struggle and Convoy HX-106 battles (playing Germany for for control of shipping lanes during World War II. both) make for excellent initial practice.
  • What It Takes to Win Succeeding in 21St Century Battle Network Competitions

    What It Takes to Win Succeeding in 21St Century Battle Network Competitions

    WHAT IT TAKES TO WIN SUCCEEDING IN 21ST CENTURY BATTLE NETWORK COMPETITIONS JOHN STILLION BRYAN CLARK Sponsored by: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Strategic Technology Office (STO) Program: STO Studies Procurement Request No. HR001135963, Program Code: GM13G Issued by DARPA/CMO under Contract No. HR0011-14-C-0028 Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited) The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressly or implied, of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency or the U.S. Government. WHAT IT TAKES TO WIN: SUCCEEDING IN 21ST CENTURY BATTLE NETWORK COMPETITIONS JOHN STILLION AND BRYAN CLARK 2015 ABOUT THE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND BUDGETARY ASSESSMENTS (CSBA) The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (CSBA) is an independent, nonpartisan policy research institute established to promote innovative thinking and debate about national security strategy and investment options. CSBA’s analysis focuses on key questions related to existing and emerging threats to U.S. national security, and its goal is to enable policymakers to make informed decisions on matters of strategy, security policy, and resource allocation. ©2015 Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. All rights reserved. ABOUT THE AUTHORS John Stillion is a Senior Fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. Dr. Stillion is a former U.S. Air Force officer, instructor navigator, and tactical
  • Manual V1.0 by Paul Sincock Ph.D

    Manual V1.0 by Paul Sincock Ph.D

    Manual v1.0 by Paul Sincock Ph.D. & Michael Allers June 3 2015 © 2015 by - 1 - Table of Contents INTRODUCTION................................................................................... 3 1. COMBAT ......................................................................................... 4 1.1 Controls ............................................................................................................4 1.1.1 Camera & Views - 3D World...............................................................................4 1.1.2 Movement.......................................................................................................6 1.1.3 Gunnery .........................................................................................................8 1.1.4 Torpedoes..................................................................................................... 11 1.1.5 Air Strikes and Aircraft.................................................................................... 13 1.1.6 Carrier Air Operations ..................................................................................... 15 1.1.7 Anti-Submarine Warfare.................................................................................. 16 1.2 Tactical Map..................................................................................................... 20 1.3 Ship Details and Damage Report......................................................................... 22 1.4 Ending Combat................................................................................................
  • 3.4 Invertebrates

    3.4 Invertebrates

    Atlantic Fleet Training and Testing Draft EIS/OEIS June 2017 Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement Atlantic Fleet Training and Testing TABLE OF CONTENTS 3.4 Invertebrates .......................................................................................................... 3.4-1 3.4.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 3.4-3 3.4.2 Affected Environment ......................................................................................... 3.4-3 3.4.2.1 General Background ........................................................................... 3.4-3 3.4.2.2 Endangered Species Act-Listed Species ............................................ 3.4-13 3.4.2.3 Species Not Listed Under the Endangered Species Act .................... 3.4-27 3.4.3 Environmental Consequences .......................................................................... 3.4-37 3.4.3.1 Acoustic Stressors ............................................................................. 3.4-37 3.4.3.2 Explosive Stressors ............................................................................ 3.4-59 3.4.3.3 Energy Stressors ................................................................................ 3.4-66 3.4.3.4 Physical Disturbance and Strike Stressors ........................................ 3.4-71 3.4.3.5 Entanglement Stressors .................................................................... 3.4-93 3.4.3.6 Ingestion Stressors .........................................................................
  • The Northern Mariner II, 3, 1-15

    The Northern Mariner II, 3, 1-15

    INSTRUMENTS OF SECURITY: THE ROYAL CANADIAN NAVYS PROCUREMENT OF THE TRIBAL-CLASS DESTROYERS, 1938-19431 Michael Whitby According to navy scuttlebutt, when in 1938 Canada's Chief of Naval Staff saw a photograph of Britain's newly-commissioned Tribal-class destroyers, he declared "I want those for my navy."' This would have been bold talk indeed. Since its inception in 1910, the Royal Canadian Navy had been a small, almost inconsequential force that received little political or popular support and had narrowly escaped an attempt to have it virtually disbanded. An almost desperate determination to avoid such threats in the future drove the RCN's leaders to go to extreme lengths to acquire Tribals, ships they thought would be too valuable for the government to scrap, and to ensure they were deployed in a manner that would being credit to the navy. The British had designed the Tribals in response to a new generation of extremely powerful "super" destroyers being built by other naval powers? Royal Navy designs after World War I were guided by staff requirements calling for "small handy ships with a good torpedo armament." The results were the "A" to "I"-class destroyers commissioned between 1927 and 1938. The four "C" or Crescent-class destroyers acquired by the RCN in the late 1930s were typical. Displacing 1375 tons with a length of 329 feet and a design speed of thirty-six knots, the Crescents were armed with four 4.7-inch guns and eight twenty-one inch torpedo tubes. These "classical British destroyers"' did not match the latest foreign designs.
  • Pfennigwerth

    Pfennigwerth

    Tribal Warfare The 1935 Tribal Class Destroyer Design in Commonwealth Service By Ian Pfennigwerth By the 1920s, the design of destroyers for the Royal Navy had essentially stabilised around proven principles– they were smallish, sturdy ships with good sea keeping capabilities and a modest range, adequately armed with surface weapons and torpedoes, and with a relatively fast speed. The genre also had the advantages of being of relatively simple design which made them easy and cheap to construct, useful qualities when they were regarded as ‘expendable’. However, by the 1930s some British rethinking of the characteristics of an ‘ideal’ destroyer was prompted by the appearance of newer and bigger models in the orders of battle of other navies. These were not only larger in size, with enhanced range and seakeeping qualities, but they were able to mount more and larger guns. As well, other navies were showing interest in improved defence against air attack, something that had been neglected in contemporary British destroyers. The British Admiralty was an interested bystander to these developments, many examples of which were being built in Britain for other navies. Both Thorneycroft and Yarrow had designed and built ‘super destroyers’ for Dutch, Yugoslav and Polish clients, and the French had produced their own super destroyer class.1 Since these were regarded as ‘friendly’ navies, it was not until the details and performance of the Japanese Fubuki became known that the Admiralty took serious notice of this trend.2 That class mounted six 5-inch [127mm] guns and nine ‘Long Lance’ torpedoes in a 1750 ton displacement hull capable of 35 knots.3 The reason for building larger destroyers (with a heavy gun armament at the expense of torpedoes) was to match the gun power of the larger destroyers being built by foreign powers, especially the 23 Japanese destroyers of the “Fubuki” class.4 Finally, in 1934 the decision was taken that a new class of ‘V Leaders’ – larger ships to act as the leader of flotillas of other destroyers - should be constructed.
  • Advanced Undersea Warfare Systems

    Advanced Undersea Warfare Systems

    NPS-SE-11-004 Naval Postgraduate School ADVANCED UNDERSEA WARFARE SYSTEMS by Systems Engineering Analysis Cohort 17, Team B June 2011 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited Prepared for: Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, CA 93943 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ii Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (From - To) 01-06-2011 Technical Report 05-08-2010 – 01-06-2011 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER ADVANCED UNDERSEA WARFARE SYSTEMS 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER Systems Engineering Analysis Cohort 17, Team B 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL NUMBER MONTEREY, CA 93943-5000 NPS-SE-11-004 9.
  • 57 Amm 4068, Ammunition and Package Markings

    57 Amm 4068, Ammunition and Package Markings

    w.o. CODE No. 1803 RESTRICTED. The information given in this document is not to be communicated, either directly or indirectly to-the Press or to any person not authorised to receive it. INTER-SERVICE AMMUNITION & AMMUNITION P A C K A G E MARKINGS | ADMIRALTY No. BR 1202 WAR OFFICE No. 5 7/AMMUNITION/4068 AIR MINISTRY No. A.885820/46/D.D.Arm. T91-2564. Wt. 6527. 15,500 pra. P.I. 12/47. Admiralty No. RR 1202 (1948) War Office No. 57/Amn./4o68 Air Ministry A.P. 3095 RESTRICTED w . o . Co d e N o . The information given in this document is not to be communicated, either directly 1803-1 or indirectly, to the Press or to any person not authorized to receive it. INTER-SERVICE AMMUNITION AND AMMUNITION PACKAGE MARKINGS • t .• ■ j-. % AMENDMENT No. 1 COVER, W.O. CODE No. 1803 AND ERRATUM Delete " ADM IRALTY No. B R 1202 ” and substitute: “ ADMIRALTY No. BR 1202 (1948) ” , Delete " A IR MINISTRY No. A.8S5820/46/D.D.ARM.” and substitute: “ AIR M INISTRY A.P.3095 SECTION 1 T it l e P a g e . Delete “ Admiralty No. BR 1202 A47 ” and substitute: " Admiralty No. BR 1202 A(i948) ”. <•. Delete “ Air Ministry No. A 885820/46/D.D.Arm.” and substitute: “ Air Ministry A.P.3095 Delete "W .O . Code No. 3419” and substitute “ W.O. Code No. 1803” . SECTION 2 T it l e P a g e . Delete “ Air Ministry No. A 885820/46/D.D.Arm.” and substitute: " Air Ministry A.P.3095 ” , Delete “ W.O.