Towards a Linguistic Worldview for Artificial Languages (PDF)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Towards a Linguistic Worldview for Artificial Languages (PDF) UNIWERSYTET IM. ADAMA MICKIEWICZA WYDZIAŁ NEOFILOLOGII INSTYTUT JĘZYKOZNAWSTWA TOWARDS A LINGUISTIC WORLDVIEW FOR ARTIFICIAL LANGUAGES IDA STRIA Rozprawa doktorska napisana pod kierunkiem prof. UAM dr hab. Ilony Koutny Poznań 2015 Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my both supervisors: the initial one, Professor Jerzy Pogonowski, who guided my interest towards artificial languages, for his patience and leniency, and the final one, Professor Ilona Koutny, to whom I am truly indebted for her relentless support and belief in me. No short note can express how great her help was. I would also like to thank my colleagues from the Institute of Linguistics, particularly from the Department of Applied Logic, for their invaluable tips and encouragement (special thanks to Sławek and Agnieszka). My thanks also go to Michael Farris for putting up with my English. Finally, I wish to thank my husband for his love. Q: How many Lojbanists does it take to change a broken light bulb? A: Two: one to decide what to change it into and one to figure out what kind of bulb emits broken light. All errors are my own. Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................... 2 List of figures ........................................................................................................... 4 List of tables............................................................................................................. 5 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 6 Research objectives................................................................................................................... 6 Pre-existing research................................................................................................................ 7 Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 8 1 Linguistic worldview ................................................................................. 9 1.1 Short history ................................................................................................................... 9 1.2 Definitions and crucial concepts .......................................................................... 12 1.3 The relation language – culture – thought ........................................................ 17 1.4 Methodology ................................................................................................................ 20 2 Artificial languages ................................................................................. 29 2.1 Definitions ..................................................................................................................... 29 2.2 History and motives of creation ........................................................................... 34 2.2.1 Universal languages .............................................................................................. 38 2.2.2 Formal languages ................................................................................................... 48 2.2.3 International auxiliary languages ................................................................... 50 2.2.4 Artistic languages .................................................................................................. 59 2.2.5 Modern glossopoeia .............................................................................................. 66 2.3 Typology and classifications .................................................................................. 69 2.3.1 Traditional classifications: structure and source of material.............. 70 2.3.2 Traditional classifications: purpose ............................................................... 72 2.3.3 Blanke’s functional classification .................................................................... 78 3 Natural vs. artificial ................................................................................ 81 3.1 Properties of human language .............................................................................. 81 3.2 The scale of naturalness .......................................................................................... 89 3.2.1 The continuum of deliberate influence ......................................................... 89 3.2.2 Lyons’s classification ............................................................................................ 94 3.3 Borderline cases ......................................................................................................... 99 3.3.1 Pidgins and creoles ............................................................................................... 99 3.3.2 Language revitalisation and revival ............................................................ 103 3.3.3 Other cases ............................................................................................................ 106 4 Esperanto as a transitional case ...................................................... 112 4.1 Naturalness of Esperanto ..................................................................................... 112 4.2 Sociolinguistic situation of Esperanto speakers ......................................... 114 5 Linguistic worldview for artificial languages ............................. 125 5.1 The subject: author or community? ................................................................. 125 5.2 Possible objects of study ...................................................................................... 132 5.3 Linguistic worldview in non-native languages ............................................ 141 5.4 Linguistic worldview for Esperanto ................................................................ 145 6 Research problems on the example of a pilot study ................ 154 6.1 The respondents ...................................................................................................... 156 6.2 The questions ........................................................................................................... 162 6.3 Conclusions ................................................................................................................ 180 Final remarks .................................................................................................... 183 The boundaries of artificiality ........................................................................................ 183 A linguistic worldview for artificial languages ......................................................... 184 References .......................................................................................................... 187 Appendix: The questionnaire ...................................................................... 200 Summary in Polish / Streszczenie ............................................................. 211 Summary in Esperanto / Resumo .............................................................. 218 List of figures Figure 1 The (simplified) relationship language – culture – perception ............... 19 Figure 2 Relationships between artificial and international languages ................. 34 Figure 3 Federico Gobbo’s coordinate system (2014) .................................................. 74 Figure 4 Classification of invented languages by Albani & Buonarotti (1994) ... 75 Figure 5 The Gnoli triangle (around 1997) ....................................................................... 76 Figure 6 Coloured version of the Gnoli triangle modified by R. A. Brown ............ 76 Figure 7 Jan van Steenbergen’s hexagon (2008) ............................................................. 77 Figure 8 Baron’s natural language spectrum (1994) .................................................... 91 Figure 9 Baron’s computer language spectrum (1994) ............................................... 92 Figure 10 Scale of artificiality/naturalness ....................................................................... 93 Figure 11 Age distribution among the participants .................................................... 157 Figure 12 Native languages of the respondents ........................................................... 158 Figure 13 Usage of Esperanto among the respondents ............................................. 159 Figure 14 Usage of four most popular languages according to activities ........... 160 Figure 15 Usage of Esperanto vs. native languages according to activities ....... 160 Figure 16 In which language would you read a book if the original language was not known to you? .................................................................................................................... 161 Figure 17 Usage of Esperanto vs. native languages according to activities ....... 161 4 List of tables Table 1 Classificatory matrix (simplified with examples) ........................................... 77 Table 2 Hockett’s design features applied to artificial languages ............................ 84 Table 3 Hockett’s design features in formal languages ................................................ 89 Table 4 Languages and their naturalness .......................................................................... 96 Table 5 Languages and their naturalness II ...................................................................... 98
Recommended publications
  • A Comparison Between Natural and Planned Languages
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) The Case of Correlatives: A Comparison between Natural and Planned Languages Gobbo, F. Publication date 2011 Document Version Final published version Published in Journal of Universal Language Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Gobbo, F. (2011). The Case of Correlatives: A Comparison between Natural and Planned Languages. Journal of Universal Language, 12(2), 45-79. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:28 Sep 2021 Federico Gobbo 45 Journal of Universal Language 12-2 September 2011, 45-79 The Case of Correlatives: A Comparison between Natural and Planned Languages Federico Gobbo University of Insubria 1 Abstract Since the publication of Volapük, the most important functional and deictic words present in grammar—interrogative, relative and demonstrative pronouns, and adjectives among others—have been described in planned grammars in a series or a table, namely “correlatives,” showing a considerable level of regularity.
    [Show full text]
  • American Esperanto Magazine
    AMERIKA ESPERANTISTO AMERICAN ESPE RANTO MAGAZINE Esperanto & Travel Council of Europe Don Giovanni kal Mi MAR-A PR 1956 AMERICAN ESPERANTO MAGAZINE (Amerika Esperanfisto) Official bimonthly publication of the ESPER-1NTO ASSOCIATION OF NORTh AMERICA, Inc. 114 West 16 St., New York u.N. Y. FIJITORIAL STAFF Ldztor C Alan Connor. Cu -Lditors; Dr. \‘illiam Solzbacher, Doris. I’. Connor, Myron R. Mychajliw. SUSTAINING BOARD OF EANA Dr. Luella K. Beecher, Dr. F. W. Breth, Allen L. Brown, A.M.Brya, John Burt, Carl W. Childress, C. C Cummingsmith, S. M. ,Preston Davis, Jr. Dr. LeeMin Han, Allan Hutcheon, Horace C. Jenkins, Dr,Francis A. Ku- beck, Katherine Muttart, Merrill E. Muttart, Bertha F. Mullin, Paul E.Nace, George Hirsch, Bertha F. Sloan, Harold S Sloan. Dr. W. Solzbacher, Mazah E. Schulz, Virgil Whanger. CONTENTS — ENIIAV() Esperanto — Language of World Travel ....... ... 35 Esperanto and the Council of Europe ........ 38 ..... Esperanto in Action Around the World - . 41 Esperanto in the Schools 44 . 46 Even the Blind Can See the Merit of Esperanto . J. Henry Kruse,Jr. Editorial in “Life” and Facts of Life Doris T. Connor 47 Rezolucio Kontraü Misuzo de la UFA Statuto - . ,...- . G. Alan Connor 48 Nia Konkurso pri Varbado de Novaj Membroj . 49 “La Infanoj de Ia Mondo” — Japana Eldona Entrepreno. 50 .... .... Perrine .. ...... George H. Don Giovanni kaj Mi . 51 La Ilustrita Vortaro de Easperanto . Donald R. Broadribb 55 . i Esperanta Kroniko 58 Niaj Pioniroj . 60 Komentoj pri I.V,E....... .,. ,......., . Francisco Azorzn 61 Deziras Korespondi ......... .... .... ...,...... 62 Bildo sur kovrilo: Asfodeloj inter Betuloj —Signo de Printempo Subscrirtions in the United States and Canada: 53.00 per year.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmopolitanism and Nationalism in Catalonia: the Case of the Esperanto Movement
    Student ID: 1560509 Cosmopolitanism and nationalism in Catalonia: the case of the Esperanto movement Student ID: 1560509 INTRODUCTION 3 LITERATURE REVIEW 7 ESPERANTO AND CATALONIA 8 NATIONALISM(S) AND COSMOPOLITANISM(S) 11 CATALAN IDENTITY AND NATIONALISM 17 IDENTITY AND ESPERANTO 21 THE STUDY 24 METHODOLOGY 24 FIRST CONTACTS WITH THE LANGUAGE, KEA AND THE IDEALS OF ESPERANTO 30 CATALAN IDENTITY AND ESPERANTISM 38 NATIONALISM, COSMOPOLITANISM AND ESPERANTO 45 CONCLUSIONS 55 BIBLIOGRAPHY 59 2 Student ID: 1560509 Introduction This essay aims to explore the idea and the practice of cosmopolitanism within the Catalan Esperanto community and its interaction with the strong self- identification of Catalan Esperantists as ‘Catalans’ (Alòs i Font, 2010). More spe- cifically, the study focuses on the members of the Catalan Association of Esperan- to ([eo]: Kataluna Esperanto-Asocio, hereinafter KEA) who reside in Barcelona, where the headquarters of the association are.1 The main research question is the following: How do the members of the Catalan Association of Esperanto balance their nation- alistic sentiments towards Catalonia and the Catalan language with the core cos- mopolitan ideology of the Esperanto movement they are part of? The question is interesting because the strong nationalism of Catalan Esperan- tists, apart from being in contrast with the traditional Esperanto ideology and culture (Zaft, 2003; Blanke, 2015), is not in line with what seems to be the reality of most Esperanto communities in Europe, as emerged from the available empir- ical studies on the subject (Rašič, 1996; Alòs i Font, 2010; Puškar, 2015). These studies show that European Esperantists have in general a weaker national iden- tity than the average citizens of their respective countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (.Pdf)
    Fiat Lingua Title: From Elvish to Klingon: Exploring Invented Languages, A Review Author: Don Boozer MS Date: 11-16-2011 FL Date: 12-01-2011 FL Number: FL-000003-00 Citation: Boozer, Don. 2011. "From Elvish to Klingon: Exploring Invented Languages, A Review." FL-000003-00, Fiat Lingua, <http:// fiatlingua.org>. Web. 01 Dec. 2011. Copyright: © 2011 Don Boozer. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. ! http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Fiat Lingua is produced and maintained by the Language Creation Society (LCS). For more information about the LCS, visit http://www.conlang.org/ From Elvish to Klingon: Exploring Invented Languages !!! A Review """ Don Boozer From Elvish to Klingon: Exploring Invented Languages. Michael Adams, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Nov. 2011. c.294 p. index. ISBN13: 9780192807090. $19.95. From Elvish to Klingon: Exploring Invented Languages is a welcome addition to the small but growing corpus of works on the subject of invented languages. The collection of essays was edited by Michael Adams, Associate Professor and Director of Undergraduate Studies in the Department of English at Indiana University Bloomington and Vice-President of the Dictionary Society of North America. Not only does Adams serve as editor, he also writes complementary appendices to accompany each of the contributed essays to expand on a particular aspect or to introduce related material. Adams’ previous works include Slang: The People’s Poetry (Oxford University Press, 2009) and Slayer Slang: A Buffy the Vampire Slayer Lexicon (Oxford University Press, 2003). Although Oxford University Press is known for its scholarly publications, the title From Elvish to Klingon would suggest that the book is geared toward a popular audience.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Introduction to Constructed Languages
    A Brief Introduction to Constructed Languages An essay by Laurier Rochon Piet Zwart Institute : June 2011 3750 words Abstract The aim of this essay will be to provide a general overview of what is considered a "constructed language" (also called conlang, formalized language or artificial language) and explore some similarities, differences and specific properties that set these languages apart from natural languages. This essay is not meant to be an exhaustive repertoire of all existing conlangs, nor should it be used as reference material to explain or dissect them. Rather, my intent is to explore and distill meaning from particular conlangs subjectively chosen for their proximity to my personal research practice based on empirical findings I could infer from their observation and brief use. I will not tackle the task of interpreting the various qualities and discrepancies of conlangs within this short study, as it would surely consist of an endeavour of its own. It should also be noted that the varying quality of documentation available for conlangs makes it difficult to find either peer-reviewed works or independent writings on these subjects. As a quick example, many artistic languages are conceived and solely used by the author himself/herself. This person is obviously the only one able to make sense of it. This short study will not focus on artlangs, but one would understand the challenge in analyzing such a creation: straying away from the beaten path affords an interesting quality to the work, but also renders difficult a precise analytical study of it. In many ways, I have realized that people involved in constructing languages are generally engaging in a fringe activity which typically does not gather much attention - understandably so, given the supremacy of natural languages in our world.
    [Show full text]
  • SCUOLA SUPERIORE PER MEDIATORI LINGUISTICI (Decreto Ministero Dell’Università 31/07/2003)
    SCUOLA SUPERIORE PER MEDIATORI LINGUISTICI (Decreto Ministero dell’Università 31/07/2003) Via P. S. Mancini, 2 – 00196 – Roma TESI DI DIPLOMA DI MEDIATORE LINGUISTICO (Curriculum Interprete e Traduttore) Equipollente ai Diplomi di Laurea rilasciati dalle Università al termine dei Corsi afferenti alla classe delle LAUREE UNIVERSITARIE IN SCIENZE DELLA MEDIAZIONE LINGUISTICA IL FENOMENO DELL’INGLESE COME LINGUA FRANCA E UNIVERSALE RELATORI: CORRELATORI: Prof.ssa Adriana Bisirri Prof.ssa Marilyn Scopes Prof.ssa Luciana Banegas Prof.ssa Claudia Piemonte CANDIDATA: Valentina Pece ANNO ACCADEMICO 2016/2017 1 Tutte le nostre lingue sono delle opere d'arte. Jean-Jacques Rousseau 2 3 SOMMARIO SEZIONE ITALIANA………………………………………………………….11 INTRODUZIONE ................................................................................................ 12 CAPITOLO 1 ....................................................................................................... 15 ALLA RICERCA DI UNA LINGUA UNIVERSALE........................................... 15 1.TERMINOLOGIA E CLASSIFICAZIONE DELLE LINGUE PIANIFICATE ..................... 17 1.1 Lingue artificiali e naturali, lingue a priori, a posteriori e miste ........... 20 1.2 Interlinguistica e Pianificazione linguistica ............................................ 23 1.3 Classificazione delle lingue artificiali ..................................................... 26 2.ALLA RICERCA DI UNA LINGUA UNIVERSALE.................................................... 27 2.1.Dall’età antica al Medioevo ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Inventors and Devotees of Artificial Languages
    From SIAM News, Volume 43, Number 5, June 2010 Inventors and Devotees of Artificial Languages In the Land of Invented Languages: Esperanto Rock Stars, Klingon Poets, Loglan Lovers, and The Mad Dreamers Who Tried to Build a Perfect Language. By Arika Okrent, Spiegel and Grau, New York, 2009, 352 pages, $26.00. In the Land of Invented Languages is a remarkably entertaining historical survey of artificial languages and their inventors, from the Lingua Ignota of Hildegard von Bingen in the 12th century through Esperanto and, more recently, Klingon. The depth of the research is impressive. The author, Arika Okrent, attended conferences in Esperanto, Loglan, and Klingon, among others; hunted up obscure self-published tomes available only in a few rare book rooms; worked through scores of these languages in enough depth to translate BOOK REVIEW passages into them; and interviewed hundreds of people, both language inventors and enthusiasts, getting to know many By Ernest Davis of them well. One of the book’s two appendices lists 500 artificial languages; the other offers translations of the Lord’s Prayer into 17 languages and of the Story of Babel into another 11. The text contains samples from many more languages, carefully explained and analyzed. Nonetheless, the book wears its learning very lightly; it is delightfully personal, and as readable as a novel. It is in fact as much about the histories of the inventors and devotees of the languages as about the languages themselves; these histories are mostly strange and often sad. Invented languages can be categorized by the purposes of their inventors.
    [Show full text]
  • Reveno Al Tririvero À Trois-Rivières De Nouveau!
    Septembro 2011 Esperanto-Societo Kebekia Jaro 27, No 105 Kebekia esperantista bulteno RRevenoeveno aall TTririveroririvero Julifine en Tririvero .........................2 Ci kaj vi en Esperanto ......................10 Esperanta boatado en Kroatio ........4 Lingwa de Planeta ...........................17 8-a MEKARO ne elrevigis ! ...............5 Esperantistaj enmigrantoj ..............21 Esperanto en la franca poŝt-servo ! .6 Kiel traduki ? ...................................25 L’esperanto : une langue par choix ! 7 150 000 artikoloj en E-Vikipedio .....29 La cimo de l’ jaro 2038 ....................9 Montrealaj k apudaj E-kunvenoj .....31 À TTrois-Rivièresrois-Rivières ddee nnouveau!ouveau! Julifine en Tririvero Francisko Lorrain Treize espérantistes, dont une chienne, se sont rencontrés à Trois-Rivières durant la dernière fin de semaine de juillet, à l’invitation de Suzanne Roy. Il a fait beau. Nous avons visité le Musée du papier, le Parc de la Rivière Batiscan, beaucoup parlé, et dégusté chez Suzanne d’excellents plats végétaliens préparés par Karlo. En la lasta Riverego, iom studis nian lingvon Suzano Roy, el kaj kunmanĝis kun ni. Tririvero, invitis Kvar montrealanoj nin pasigi la du loĝis ĉe Suzano, alia ĉe lastajn tagojn de Francisko Gauthier, tute julio — sabaton kaj proksime, en la centra, dimanĉon — en sia malnova, tre agrabla, urbo. Entute dek tri riveregborda kvartalo Foto: Vikipedio homoj partoprenis en de la urbo. almenaŭ parto de la tuta programo. Eble ne ĉiuj legantoj scias, kial tiu urbo El Montrealo venis nomiĝas Tririvero. Nu, ĝi Ĵoel, Ĵenja, Den, situas ĉe la kunfluejo de Karlo, Espero (la poliglota hundo de Den kaj Karlo la rivero Saint-Maurice kaj riverego Saint-Laurent. — ŝi komprenas kaj la hispanan kaj Esperanton) Sed kiu estas la tria rivero ? Ne estas tria rivero tie.
    [Show full text]
  • The Perfect Language and the Mathematicians
    Jekyll.comm 1 – marzo 2002 Mathematicians and the perfect language: Giuseppe Peano’s case By Daniele Gouthier, Nico Pitrelli and Ivan Pupolizo Master’s Degree Course in Scientific Communication – ISAS – Trieste – Italy Attempts to create an International Artificial Language (IAL) have kept pace with the evolution of modern science. Ever since Galileo’s time, scientists have been interested in how to create a perfect language (the adjective “perfect” takes on the meaning of “universal” or “unambiguous” depending on the period) capable of supporting communication at a horizontal level i.e. within the scientific community, and at a vertical level, i.e. between scientists and the public. The first goal of this article is to describe briefly how this need for a perfect language developed over the past years. Special attention will be spent on the mathematicians’ role, especially Giuseppe Peano’s. The second goal is to illustrate how Giuseppe Peano’s contribution to this debate proved twofold and led to various conclusions. The Italian mathematician played a leading role in the creation of a perfect language, both at a horizontal and a vertical level. On the one hand, there is his successful attempt to introduce a standard logical and symbolic system of notation, which became essential for communication among mathematicians. On the other hand, there is the complete failure of his ambitious Latino sine flexione (Latin without inflection), a perfect language which died with its creator. Introduction People have been interested in the creation of a perfect language for more than two thousand years. From ancient Greek philosophers to present PC programmers, the search for a universal language is ever present in the history of culture and, more specifically, of science.
    [Show full text]
  • UTOPIAN for BEGINNERS an Amateur Linguist Loses Control of the Language He Invented
    ANNALS OF LINGUISTICS DECEMBER 24 & 31, 2012 IUE UTOPIAN FOR BEGINNERS An amateur linguist loses control of the language he invented. By Joshua Foer Quijada’s invented language has two seemingly incompatible ambitions: to be maximally precise but also maximally concise. here are so many ways for speakers of English to see the world. We can T glimpse, glance, visualize, view, look, spy, or ogle. Stare, gawk, or gape. Peek, watch, or scrutinize. Each word suggests some subtly different quality: looking implies volition; spying suggests furtiveness; gawking carries an element of social judgment and a sense of surprise. When we try to describe an act of vision, we consider a constellation of available meanings. But if thoughts and words exist on different planes, then expression must always be an act of compromise. Languages are something of a mess. They evolve over centuries through an unplanned, democratic process that leaves them teeming with irregularities, quirks, and words like “knight.” No one who set out to design a form of communication would ever end up with anything like English, Mandarin, or any of the more than six thousand languages spoken today. “Natural languages are adequate, but that doesn’t mean they’re optimal,” John Quijada, a fty-three-year-old former employee of the California State Department of Motor Vehicles, told me. In 2004, he published a monograph on the Internet that was titled “Ithkuil: A Philosophical Design for a Hypothetical Language.” Written like a linguistics textbook, the fourteen-page Web site ran to almost a hundred and sixty thousand words. It documented the grammar, syntax, and lexicon of a language that Quijada had spent three decades inventing in his spare time.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward Sapir's View About International Auxiliary Language
    EMANUEL KULCZYCKI EDWARD SAPIR’S VIEW ABOUT INTERNATIONAL AUXILIARY LANGUAGE Introduction The search for common attributes of all languages is connected with the search for characteristics which differentiate languages. If some attributes cannot be found in every language, what is cause of this situation? Is it linked up with the origin of language or with users of the language? People inquire about such matters because the multiplicity of natural languages generates incomprehension and handicaps human communication. The minimum number of languages in the world has been set at 4,000 and the maximum at 8,000. In spite of this people can communicate over communication’s barriers which are generated by the multiplicity of mother-languages. But that diversity worries and disturbs. A Danish linguist Otto Jespersen wrote: „An American may travel from Boston to San Francisco without hearing more than one language. But if he were to traverse the same distance on this side of the Atlantic, he would have a totally different story to tell (…) he would then hear perhaps Norwegian, Swedish, Danish, German, Czecho-Slovakian, Hungarian, Rumanian, Bulgarian, Turkish, Greek, and then in Egypt Arabic and a little English (…) He would not have heard of the languages spoken in Europe. The curse of Babel is still with us”1. It means that we have to use more than one language to 1 O. Jespersen: An International Language, Allen & Unwin, London 1928; <http://www.geocities.com/ /Athens/Forum/5037/AILneed.html>. 66 Emanuel Kulczycki communicate with another man. So some universal language – an international auxiliary language could make whole social communication easy.
    [Show full text]
  • LING Thesis Draft 5
    TOLKIEN’S TONGUES: * THE PHONETICS AND PHONOLOGY OF TOLKIEN’S QUENYA LANGUAGE Kelsey Ryan ABSTRACT J.R.R. Tolkien, author of The Lord of the Rings and other Middle Earth tales as well as Oxford professor of linguistics, constructed over 14 languages in the development of the background of his stories. This thesis will seek to understand Tolkien’s linguistic experiment of Quenya, first in its historical context, and then assess its linguistic merit and behaviors. In the first few sections, Tolkien’s linguistic and academic background will be investigated, setting the scene for further linguistic analysis. This thesis then explores how the authentic nature of the language is developed and evoked through the phonetics and phonology of Tolkien’s Quenya, using the poem “Namárië” from The Fellowship of the Ring for analysis. Smith (2010:7) argues that Tolkien created a “flowing,” “light and melodious” language, designed much like a Romance language, with no “potentially harsh” phonemes or “brusque English consonant clusters.” But with such claims must come evidence. This thesis provides the background research Smith (2010) lacks behind these claims, defining Quenya as a functional language, with clear patterns and tendencies towards particular phonetic and linguistic behaviors. * Special thanks to: my advisors Professors Nathan Sanders (Linguistics) and Maud McInerney (English), Sofia Berlin and Lisa Bao, the library staff, particularly Jeremiah Mercurio, and Lizzie Carp and Bobby Brooks, for their ‘Excel-lent’ help in creating graphs. Thanks also to my close friends, who have pushed me to explore nerd culture all my life. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction………………………………………………………………………3 2 Tolkien Biography……………………………………………………………….4 3 Constructed Languages and Tolkien……..……………………..……………...7 4 Description and Use of Languages.……………………………………………..8 5 Data and Phonetic Analysis: Quenya………………………………….………13 5i.
    [Show full text]