The Management of Ornamental Fish in Australia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Management of Ornamental Fish in Australia A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council November 2006 © Commonwealth of Australia 2007 ISBN 921192 18 6 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Attorney General’s Department, Robert Garran Offices, National Circuit, Barton ACT 2600 or posted at http://www.ag.gov.au/cca. The Australian Government acting through the Bureau of Rural Sciences has exercised due care and skill in the preparation and compilation of the information and data set out in this publication. Notwithstanding, the Bureau of Rural Sciences, its employees and advisers disclaim all liability, including liability for negligence, for any loss, damage, injury, expense or cost incurred by any person as a result of accessing, using or relying upon any of the information or data set out in this publication to the maximum extent permitted by law. Postal address: Bureau of Rural Sciences GPO Box 858 Canberra, ACT 2601 Copies available from: BRS Publication Sales GPO Box 858 Canberra ACT 2601 Telephone 1800 020 157 Fax (02) 6272 2330 Email [email protected] Internet http://www.brs.gov.au CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 1 5 MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL PESTS AND NOXIOUS SPECIES IN AUSTRALIA . 19 1 INTRODUCTION . 2 6 COMMUNICATION PLAN . 23 Need for a national approach . 4 Terms of reference . 5 7 RECOMMENDATIONS AND NEXT STEPS . 24 Next steps . 24 2 EXISTING CONTROLS . 6 Importation . 6 Applications to amend the list of permitted REFERENCES . 25 imports . 6 Roles and responsibilities of AQIS and APPENDIX 1 Ornamental Fish Policy Working Biosecurity Australia . 8 Group Membership . 26 State/Territory regulation . 8 Risk assessment framework . 10 APPENDIX 2 Noxious List and Grey List Species . 27 3 NOXIOUS SPECIES . 11 APPENDIX 3 Noxious Aquatic Plants (Declared Aquatic Plants of Australia) . 32 Proposed action . 12 Live rock . 12 APPENDIX 4 Current Regulation of Ornamental Potential management options . 13 Fish in Australia . 34 Aquatic plants . 14 APPENDIX 5 PIAA Member’s Code of Ethics . 38 4 PROPOSED REGULATORY FRAMEWORK . 15 Regulation of pet shops . 16 APPENDIX 6 Regional Contacts . 39 Decision support trees for regulation of the ornamental fish trade and hobby sectors . 16 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS . 40 A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The ornamental aquarium fish trade in Australia has environment. There is no consistency between been estimated to be worth approximately $350 mechanisms or controls across regulatory agencies to million annually, although concise details are deal with the serious issue of noxious aquatic pests, unavailable. This figure includes commercial fish- with the exception of a few species. Past efforts to breeding facilities, wholesale traders, retail outlets and regulate the ornamental fish industry have failed, the hobby industry. primarily as a result of heavy-handed approaches to The trade is complex, with each jurisdiction having regulation and a lack of consultation and failure to different regulatory frameworks and management engage effectively with industry stakeholders. The Pet regimes. Translocation of fish across borders occurs Industry Association of Australia (PIAA) has with impunity and no-one, apart from some major supported this review of the ornamental fish trade. wholesale businesses and hobby groups, really knows The PIAA, in association with state and territory which species are being traded in Australia, or the governments, has committed to the implementation of numbers of prohibited or noxious fish being bred and this report’s recommendations, to ensure that the traded in the industry. industry has an economically sound and environmentally sustainable future. Ornamental fish present a significant risk to aquatic systems in Australia and have the potential to trigger This report contains seven recommendations for the or contribute to a future major aquatic animal pest or future management and regulation of the ornamental disease incursion, particularly in freshwater habitats. fish trade in Australia (see page 24). The Ornamental This document does not specifically discuss disease Fish Policy Working Group, which researched the risks associated with ornamental fish as those risks are industry and developed the recommendations, subject to separate review by Biosecurity Australia and recognises that unless there is a consistent, national the National Aquatic Animal Health Committee. approach to regulate and manage the industry, the ad hoc approach taken to date will continue, with the A number of populations of exotic or non-endemic likely outcome of further exotic invasions and disease ornamental fish species are established in Australia, threats to Australian fisheries and aquaculture and these ‘pests’ are seriously impacting on industries. biodiversity in our freshwater systems. Some aquatic plants, such as Caulerpa taxifolia (which was traded The recommendations of the report address the need in the aquarium industry until recently), can have for a nationally recognised noxious species list and devastating effects on marine systems if released, and new management frameworks for the ornamental future escapes and invasions need to be avoided. sector as a whole. The report also recognises the importance of improved communication with all Many fish species in the trade are not on the current stakeholders and the wider community through a national permitted species lists established under Part comprehensive communication plan. 13A of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 or covered by quarantine At its 11th Meeting on the 24 November 2006, The regulations. It may be that such species have been Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council permitted under previous statutory arrangements, but endorsed this report and agreed to provide funding to they are no longer on the list and are unlikely to have implement the key recommendations. been assessed for their potential risk to the A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Worldwide, the keeping of ornamental fish in aquaria There is an active but difficult to quantify unregulated is a popular hobby; aquaria are a regular sight in trade in fish within hobby associations and between many homes and in workplaces and other public enthusiasts. Given data for the United Kingdom which spaces. In the United Kingdom, for example, the estimates that about 7% of hobbyists keep more than population of pet fish is estimated to be 140 million, 100 fish (over 40% of the total number of pet fish or about two and a half times the human population. owned) and indications that this trend is global, it is In Australia, the total pet fish population is not reasonable to assume that there is a significant known but it undoubtedly totals many millions, with unregulated and (officially) unrecorded trade in fish just over 15.5 million fish being imported during between hobbyists in Australia. This view is certainly 2005. About 97% of these imports were freshwater supported by the anecdotal information available in species. club bulletins, magazines and aquarium websites. In Australia, it is also estimated that between 12% With many millions of fish being transported around and 14% of the population participate in the aquarist the globe, many well beyond their natural range, hobby at some level (Patrick 1998). The Australian importation of aquarium fish is seen by many aquarium industry is relatively small, with total countries as a major potential source of invasive turnover at the retail level estimated to be about $65 species (McDowall 2004). Recent studies (Lintermans million. Approximately 1500 retailers (aquariums and 2004) suggest that approximately 34 exotic freshwater pet shops) across Australia deal in aquarium fish. species have established populations in Australia; the According to the Pet Industry Association of Australia pathway for 22 of these species is thought to have (PIAA) approximately 60% of aquarium fish are been the ornamental fish industry. Given the well- supplied domestically by local breeders; the other demonstrated difficulties in eradicating species once 40% are imported. they are established, the sound investment of resources requires a focus on effective management and control both of new species coming into Australia and of those already known to be circulating in the trade and hobby associations within the country. 2 A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA A number of key challenges have been identified in – improve aquarium dealers’ access to information progressing a national approach to the management of about differing regulations across jurisdictions, ornamental fish. The points below are far from all- including notification of changes to prohibited inclusive, but summarise some of the key issues that species lists; and have been raised in recent years: – disseminate information to those dealers and • Within jurisdictions, a lack of personnel adequately hobbyists who are outside existing formal trained to identify aquarium species (fish and networks (e.g. professional associations).
Recommended publications
  • CAT Vertebradosgt CDC CECON USAC 2019
    Catálogo de Autoridades Taxonómicas de vertebrados de Guatemala CDC-CECON-USAC 2019 Centro de Datos para la Conservación (CDC) Centro de Estudios Conservacionistas (Cecon) Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacia Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala Este documento fue elaborado por el Centro de Datos para la Conservación (CDC) del Centro de Estudios Conservacionistas (Cecon) de la Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacia de la Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala. Guatemala, 2019 Textos y edición: Manolo J. García. Zoólogo CDC Primera edición, 2019 Centro de Estudios Conservacionistas (Cecon) de la Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacia de la Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala ISBN: 978-9929-570-19-1 Cita sugerida: Centro de Estudios Conservacionistas [Cecon]. (2019). Catálogo de autoridades taxonómicas de vertebrados de Guatemala (Documento técnico). Guatemala: Centro de Datos para la Conservación [CDC], Centro de Estudios Conservacionistas [Cecon], Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacia, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala [Usac]. Índice 1. Presentación ............................................................................................ 4 2. Directrices generales para uso del CAT .............................................. 5 2.1 El grupo objetivo ..................................................................... 5 2.2 Categorías taxonómicas ......................................................... 5 2.3 Nombre de autoridades .......................................................... 5 2.4 Estatus taxonómico
    [Show full text]
  • Extinction Risk and Conservation of the World's Sharks and Rays
    RESEARCH ARTICLE elife.elifesciences.org Extinction risk and conservation of the world’s sharks and rays Nicholas K Dulvy1,2*, Sarah L Fowler3, John A Musick4, Rachel D Cavanagh5, Peter M Kyne6, Lucy R Harrison1,2, John K Carlson7, Lindsay NK Davidson1,2, Sonja V Fordham8, Malcolm P Francis9, Caroline M Pollock10, Colin A Simpfendorfer11,12, George H Burgess13, Kent E Carpenter14,15, Leonard JV Compagno16, David A Ebert17, Claudine Gibson3, Michelle R Heupel18, Suzanne R Livingstone19, Jonnell C Sanciangco14,15, John D Stevens20, Sarah Valenti3, William T White20 1IUCN Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada; 2Earth to Ocean Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada; 3IUCN Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, NatureBureau International, Newbury, United Kingdom; 4Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, Gloucester Point, United States; 5British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, United Kingdom; 6Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia; 7Southeast Fisheries Science Center, NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, Panama City, United States; 8Shark Advocates International, The Ocean Foundation, Washington, DC, United States; 9National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New Zealand; 10Global Species Programme, International Union for the Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • Managing the Biosecurity Risk of Ornamental Aquarium Fish in Queensland
    Invasive fish Managing the biosecurity risk of ornamental aquarium fish in Queensland Pearl cichlid (Geophagus brasiliensis) Jaguar cichlid (Parachromis managuensis) Silver arowana (Osteoglossum bicirrhosum) Delhezi bichir (Polypterus delhezi) The keeping of freshwater ornamental fish and The biosecurity risks associated with ornamental fish invertebrates is a hobby enjoyed by many Queenslanders. and invertebrates broadly includes the: Australia-wide, the hobby supports a $350 million • accidental or intentional release of any fish or industry of growers (aquaculture and breeders), importers, invertebrates into our environment wholesalers and retailers. The ornamental fish industry now includes over 1000 species of which 8 to 10 million • introduction of exotic pathogens (viruses and bacteria) are imported into Australia annually. In recent years, there and parasites into Australia (including the environment has also been an upsurge in the keeping of freshwater and aquarium or aquaculture industries) via fish or invertebrates (including molluscs and crustaceans). invertebrates or the water in which they have been kept • unlawful importation of ornamental fish and invertebrates into Australia. Biosecurity Queensland’s primary focus is on preventing All living plants and animals (other than humans) may be the introduction of ornamental fish into our natural considered biosecurity matter. This includes ornamental waterways and reducing the spread of those already fish and invertebrates. A biosecurity risk exists when you present. deal with any pest (such as a fish), disease or contaminant or something that could carry one of these. A biosecurity Ornamental fish and invertebrates as event is caused by a pest, disease or contaminant that is or is likely to become a problem for human health, social environmental pests amenity, the economy or the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • 33 Abstract Dna Barcoding, Phylogenetic Diversity
    DNA BARCODING, PHYLOGENETIC DIVERSITY STUDIES OF ETROPLUS SURATENSIS FISH FROM POORANANKUPPAM BRACKISH WATER, PUDUCHERRY Sachithanandam V.1, Mohan P.M.1, Muruganandam N.2, Chaaithanya I.K.2, Arun Kumar P3, Siva Sankar R3 1 ijcrr Department of Ocean Studies and Marine Biology, Pondicherry University, Vol 04 issue 08 Andaman 2Regional Medical Research Centre (ICMR), Andaman Category: Research 3Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Pondicherry University, Received on:29/01/12 Puducherry Revised on:16/02/12 E-mail of Corresponding Author: [email protected] Accepted on:03/03/12 ABSTRACT Etroplus suratensis is known for the high commercial value fish available in South India. The identification of the species of this fish cumbersome and inaccurate in different life stages of the fish. Therefore, DNA sequence of cytochrome Oxidase subunit I gene was analysed for the species identification and phylogenetic relationship of the species. The average genetic distance of conspecifics species value was found to be 0.005%. The present work suggests that COI sequence provides sufficient information on phylogenetic and evolutionary relationship to distinguish the Etroplus suratensis species, the brackish waters species of pearl spots, unambiguously. Further, this work revealed that every species having individual genetic distances depended upon the environmental stress and water quality, which play an important role for its minor morphometric variations. Therefore, it was concluded that a DNA COI barcoding tool can be used for fish identification by non technical personnel (other than taxonomist). ____________________________________________________________________________________ Keywords: DNA barcoding, COI, brackish of more than US$ 3/kg2. These fish is available water, Pooranankuppam and Etroplus suratensis throughout the year.
    [Show full text]
  • “Icf” “Plan De Manejo Del Pa
    INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE CONSERVACIÓN Y DESARROLLO FORESTAL, ÁREAS PROTEGIDAS Y VIDA SILVESTRE “ICF” DEPARTAMENTO DE ÁREAS PROTEGIDAS “DAP” OFICINA REGIONAL FORESTAL NOROCCIDENTE OFICINA REGIONAL FORESTAL DE ATLÁNTIDA “PLAN DE MANEJO DEL PARQUE NACIONAL BLANCA JEANNETTE KAWAS FERNANDEZ” 2012 - 2016 CO - MANEJANTES Municipalidad de Tela Municipalidad de Puerto Cortés COOPERANTE TELA, HONDURAS JUNIO, 2012 PLAN DE MANEJO DEL PARQUE NACIONAL BLANCA JEANNETTE KAWAS FERNÁNDEZ El presente documento se elaboró durante el período de septiembre a diciembre del año 2011 y enero a mayo del año 2012, a solicitud de La Fundación para la Protección de Lancetilla, Punta Sal y Texiguat (PROLANSATE), con el apoyo financiero del El Proyecto de Gestión Sostenible de los Recursos Naturales y Cuencas del Corredor Biológico Mesoamericano en el Atlántico Hondureño (PROCORREDOR). El documento muestra los resultados de la actualización del Plan de Manejo del Parque Nacional Blanca Jeannette Kawas Fernández (PNJK), el cual incluye aspectos biofísicos, socioeconómicos, legales, una propuesta de zonificación y los programas de manejo. República de Honduras, 2012 Coordinación técnica y responsable directo Ph.D. Enrique Alvarado Irías (in fíeri) (Especialista en socioeconómica ambiental) Equipo Técnico M.Sc Jorge Alfredo Cárcamo (Especialista en SIG y gestión integral de microcuencas) Ing. Ana Patricia Martínez (Especialista en áreas protegidas y biodiversidad) Lic. Aarón Mendoza (Especialista en monitoreo de especies) Supervisión Técnica Ing. Dennis Sierra (Director de PROLANSATE) Ing. Fanny Fuentes (Técnico de PROLANSATE) Ing. Rómulo Gutiérrez (Representante del ICF/Tela) Lic. Miguel Ángel Ordoñez (Representante de la UMA/Tela) Ing. Carlos Madrid (Representante de la DEMA/Puerto Cortés) Edición técnica y de estilo Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S
    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Temporal Diversification of Mesoamerican Cichlid Fishes Across
    MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31 (2004) 754–764 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Temporal diversification of Mesoamerican cichlid fishes across a major biogeographic boundary C. Darrin Hulsey,a,* Francisco J. Garcıa de Leon, b Yara Sanchez Johnson,b Dean A. Hendrickson,c and Thomas J. Neara,1 a Center for Population Biology, Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA b Laboratorio de Biologıa Integrativa, Instituto Tecnologico de Cuidad Victoria (ITCV), Mexico c Section of Integrative Biology, University of Texas-Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA Received 18 June 2003; revised 26 August 2003 Abstract The Mexican Neovolcanic Plateau sharply divides the vertebrate fauna of Mesoamerica where the climate of both the neotropics and temperate North America gradually blend. Only a few vertebrate groups such as the Heroine cichlids, distributed from South America to the Rio Grande in North America, are found both north and south of the Neovolcanic Plateau. To better understand the geography and temporal diversification of cichlids at this geologic boundary, we used mitochondrial DNA sequences of the cy- tochrome b (cyt b) gene to reconstruct the relationships of 52 of the approximately 80 species of Heroine cichlids in Mesoamerica. Our analysis suggests several cichlids in South America should be considered as part of the Mesoamerican Heroine clade because they and the cichlids north of the Isthmus of Panama are clearly supported as monophyletic with respect to all other Neotropical cichlids. We also recovered a group containing species in Paratheraps + Paraneetroplus + Vieja as the sister clade to Herichthys. Herichthys is the only cichlid clade north of the Mexican Plateau and it is monophyletic.
    [Show full text]
  • Category Popular Name of the Group Phylum Class Invertebrate
    Category Popular name of the group Phylum Class Invertebrate Arthropod Arthropoda Insecta Invertebrate Arthropod Arthropoda Insecta Vertebrate Fish Chordata Actinopterygii Vertebrate Fish Chordata Actinopterygii Vertebrate Fish Chordata Actinopterygii Vertebrate Fish Chordata Actinopterygii Invertebrate Arthropod Arthropoda Insecta Invertebrate Arthropod Arthropoda Insecta Vertebrate Reptile Chordata Reptilia Vertebrate Fish Chordata Actinopterygii Vertebrate Fish Chordata Actinopterygii Vertebrate Fish Chordata Actinopterygii Invertebrate Arthropod Arthropoda Insecta Vertebrate Fish Chordata Actinopterygii Vertebrate Fish Chordata Actinopterygii Vertebrate Fish Chordata Actinopterygii Vertebrate Fish Chordata Actinopterygii Vertebrate Fish Chordata Actinopterygii Vertebrate Fish Chordata Actinopterygii Vertebrate Reptile Chordata Reptilia Invertebrate Arthropod Arthropoda Insecta Invertebrate Arthropod Arthropoda Insecta Invertebrate Arthropod Arthropoda Insecta Invertebrate Arthropod Arthropoda Insecta Invertebrate Arthropod Arthropoda Insecta Invertebrate Arthropod Arthropoda Insecta Invertebrate Arthropod Arthropoda Insecta Invertebrate Arthropod Arthropoda Insecta Invertebrate Arthropod Arthropoda Insecta Invertebrate Mollusk Mollusca Bivalvia Vertebrate Amphibian Chordata Amphibia Invertebrate Arthropod Arthropoda Insecta Vertebrate Fish Chordata Actinopterygii Invertebrate Mollusk Mollusca Bivalvia Invertebrate Arthropod Arthropoda Insecta Invertebrate Arthropod Arthropoda Insecta Invertebrate Arthropod Arthropoda Insecta Vertebrate
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Cytogenetics of Neotropical Cichlid Fishes
    COMPARATIVE A peer-reviewed open-access journal CompCytogen 8(3): 169–183 (2014)Comparative cytogenetics of Neotropical cichlid fishes... 169 doi: 10.3897/CompCytogen.v8i3.7279 RESEARCH ARTICLE Cytogenetics www.pensoft.net/journals/compcytogen International Journal of Plant & Animal Cytogenetics, Karyosystematics, and Molecular Systematics Comparative cytogenetics of Neotropical cichlid fishes (Nannacara, Ivanacara and Cleithracara) indicates evolutionary reduction of diploid chromosome numbers Lucie Hodaňová1, Lukáš Kalous1, Zuzana Musilová1,2,3 1 Department of Zoology and Fisheries, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic 2 Laboratory of Fish Genetics, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics AV CR, Libechov, Czech Republic 3 Zoological Institute, University of Basel, Switzerland Corresponding author: Zuzana Musilová ([email protected]) Academic editor: Petr Rab | Received 17 February 2014 | Accepted 29 July 2014 | Published 8 August 2014 http://zoobank.org/E973BC3C-DBEA-4915-9E63-6BBEE9E0940D Citation: Hodaňová L, Kalous L, Musilová Z (2014) Comparative cytogenetics of Neotropical cichlid fishes Nannacara( , Ivanacara and Cleithracara) indicates evolutionary reduction of diploid chromosome numbers. Comparative Cytogenetics 8(3): 169–183. doi: 10.3897/CompCytogen.v8i3.7279 Abstract A comparative cytogenetic analysis was carried out in five species of a monophyletic clade of neotropical Cichlasomatine cichlids, namely Cleithracara maronii Steindachner, 1881, Ivanacara adoketa (Kullander & Prada-Pedreros, 1993), Nannacara anomala Regan, 1905, N. aureocephalus Allgayer, 1983 and N. tae- nia Regan, 1912. Karyotypes and other chromosomal characteristics were revealed by CDD banding and mapped onto the phylogenetic hypothesis based on molecular analyses of four genes, namely cyt b, 16S rRNA, S7 and RAG1. The diploid numbers of chromosomes ranged from 44 to 50, karyotypes were com- posed predominantly of monoarmed chromosomes and one to three pairs of CMA3 signal were observed.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Fish Biology Symposium,” We Are Including 48 Oral and Poster Papers on a Diverse Range of Species, Covering a Number of Topics
    Advances in Fish Biology SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS Adalberto Val Don MacKinlay International Congress on the Biology of Fish Tropical Hotel Resort, Manaus Brazil, August 1-5, 2004 Copyright © 2004 Physiology Section, American Fisheries Society All rights reserved International Standard Book Number(ISBN) 1-894337-44-1 Notice This publication is made up of a combination of extended abstracts and full papers, submitted by the authors without peer review. The formatting has been edited but the content is the responsibility of the authors. The papers in this volume should not be cited as primary literature. The Physiology Section of the American Fisheries Society offers this compilation of papers in the interests of information exchange only, and makes no claim as to the validity of the conclusions or recommendations presented in the papers. For copies of these Symposium Proceedings, or the other 20 Proceedings in the Congress series, contact: Don MacKinlay, SEP DFO, 401 Burrard St Vancouver BC V6C 3S4 Canada Phone: 604-666-3520 Fax 604-666-0417 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.fishbiologycongress.org ii PREFACE Fish are so important in our lives that they have been used in thousands of different laboratories worldwide to understand and protect our environment; to understand and ascertain the foundation of vertebrate evolution; to understand and recount the history of vertebrate colonization of isolated pristine environments; and to understand the adaptive mechanisms to extreme environmental conditions. More importantly, fish are one of the most important sources of protein for the human kind. Efforts at all levels have been made to increase fish production and, undoubtedly, the biology of fish, especially the biology of unknown species, has much to contribute.
    [Show full text]
  • Maturity, Growth and Natural Mortality Rate of the Introduced Fish
    Original Article Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia, 2020, vol. 32, e29 https://doi.org/10.1590/S2179-975X2820 ISSN 2179-975X on-line version Maturity, growth and natural mortality rate of the introduced fish Parachromis managuensis (Perciformes: Cichlidae) in the semiarid region of Brazil Maturidade, crescimento e taxa de mortalidade natural do peixe introduzido Parachromis managuensis (Perciformes: Cichlidae) na região semiárida do Brasil Amanda Graziele Araújo Resende1,2* , Elton José de França3 , Cícero Diogo Lins de Oliveira1,2 and Francisco Marcante Santana1,2 1 Laboratório de Dinâmica de Populações Aquáticas – DAQUA, Unidade Acadêmica de Serra Talhada – UAST), Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco – UFRPE, Avenida Gregório Ferraz Nogueira, s/n, José Tomé de Souza Ramos, CEP: 56909-535, Serra Talhada, PE, Brasil 2 Programa de Pós-graduação em Biodiversidade e Conservação – PGBC, Unidade Acadêmica de Serra Talhada – UAST, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco – UFRPE, Avenida Gregório Ferraz Nogueira, s/n, José Tomé de Souza Ramos, CEP: 56909-535, Serra Talhada, PE, Brasil 3 Laboratório de Ecologia e Sistemática de Peixes – LAESP, Unidade Acadêmica de Serra Talhada – UAST, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco – UFRPE, Avenida Gregório Ferraz Nogueira, s/n, José Tomé de Souza Ramos, CEP: 56909-535, Serra Talhada, PE, Brasil *e-mail: [email protected] Cite as: Resende, A.G.A. et al. Maturity, growth and natural mortality rate of the introduced fish Parachromis managuensis (Perciformes: Cichlidae) in the semiarid region of Brazil. Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia, 2020, vol. 32, e29. Abstract: Aim: The present study aimed to estimate the sexual maturity, growth and mortality rates of the jaguar guapote, Parachromis managuensis, an introduced fish species in the Brazilian semiarid region.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics and Historical Biogeography of Greater Antillean Cichlidae
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 39 (2006) 619–627 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Systematics and historical biogeography of Greater Antillean Cichlidae Prosanta Chakrabarty ¤ University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Fish Division, 1109 Geddes Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1079, USA Received 15 July 2005; revised 8 January 2006; accepted 11 January 2006 Available online 21 February 2006 Abstract A molecular phylogenetic analysis recovers a pattern consistent with a drift vicariance scenario for the origin of Greater Antillean cichlids. This phylogeny, based on mitochondrial and nuclear genes, reveals that clades on diVerent geographic regions diverged concur- rently with the geological separation of these areas. Middle America was initially colonized by South American cichlids in the Cretaceous, most probably through the Cretaceous Island Arc. The separation of Greater Antillean cichlids and their mainland Middle American rel- atives was caused by a drift vicariance event that took place when the islands became separated from Yucatan in the Eocene. Greater Antillean cichlids are monophyletic and do not have close South American relatives. Therefore, the alternative hypothesis that these cich- lids migrated via an Oligocene landbridge from South America is falsiWed. A marine dispersal hypothesis is not employed because the drift vicariance hypothesis is better able to explain the biogeographic patterns, both temporal and phylogenetic. © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: Cichlidae; Caribbean geology; Greater Antilles biogeography; Molecular systematics “The geology is in many respects uncertain, the phyletic 1999). The other category suggests Middle American ori- analysis inadequate and the fossil record wretched. We gins from a period of coalescence between these islands and have if not the worst case scenario deWnitely a very bad Yucatan in the early Cenozoic (Pitman et al., 1993; Pindell, one.” 1994; updated from Malfait and Dinkelman, 1972; Ted- ford, 1974).
    [Show full text]