<<

A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL IN AUSTRALIA

A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF

ORNAMENTAL FISH

IN AUSTRALIA

Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council November 2006 © Commonwealth of Australia 2007 ISBN 921192 18 6 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Attorney General’s Department, Robert Garran Offices, National Circuit, Barton ACT 2600 or posted at http://www.ag.gov.au/cca. The Australian Government acting through the Bureau of Rural Sciences has exercised due care and skill in the preparation and compilation of the information and data set out in this publication. Notwithstanding, the Bureau of Rural Sciences, its employees and advisers disclaim all liability, including liability for negligence, for any loss, damage, injury, expense or cost incurred by any person as a result of accessing, using or relying upon any of the information or data set out in this publication to the maximum extent permitted by law.

Postal address: Bureau of Rural Sciences GPO Box 858 Canberra, ACT 2601

Copies available from: BRS Publication Sales GPO Box 858 Canberra ACT 2601 Telephone 1800 020 157 Fax (02) 6272 2330 Email [email protected] Internet http://www.brs.gov.au CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...... 1 5 MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL PESTS AND NOXIOUS IN AUSTRALIA ...... 19

1 INTRODUCTION ...... 2 6 COMMUNICATION PLAN ...... 23 Need for a national approach ...... 4

Terms of reference ...... 5 7 RECOMMENDATIONS AND NEXT STEPS ...... 24 Next steps ...... 24 2 EXISTING CONTROLS ...... 6 Importation ...... 6 Applications to amend the list of permitted REFERENCES ...... 25 imports ...... 6 Roles and responsibilities of AQIS and APPENDIX 1 Ornamental Fish Policy Working Biosecurity Australia ...... 8 Group Membership ...... 26 State/Territory regulation ...... 8 Risk assessment framework ...... 10 APPENDIX 2 Noxious List and Grey List Species . . 27

3 NOXIOUS SPECIES ...... 11 APPENDIX 3 Noxious Aquatic Plants (Declared Aquatic Plants of Australia) ...... 32 Proposed action ...... 12 Live rock ...... 12 APPENDIX 4 Current Regulation of Ornamental Potential management options ...... 13 Fish in Australia ...... 34 Aquatic plants ...... 14

APPENDIX 5 PIAA Member’s Code of Ethics . . . 38 4 PROPOSED REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ...... 15 Regulation of pet shops ...... 16 APPENDIX 6 Regional Contacts ...... 39 Decision support trees for regulation of the ornamental fish trade and hobby sectors ...... 16 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ...... 40

A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA iii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The ornamental fish trade in Australia has environment. There is no consistency between been estimated to be worth approximately $350 mechanisms or controls across regulatory agencies to million annually, although concise details are deal with the serious issue of noxious aquatic pests, unavailable. This figure includes commercial fish- with the exception of a few species. Past efforts to breeding facilities, wholesale traders, retail outlets and regulate the ornamental fish industry have failed, the hobby industry. primarily as a result of heavy-handed approaches to The trade is complex, with each jurisdiction having regulation and a lack of consultation and failure to different regulatory frameworks and management engage effectively with industry stakeholders. The Pet regimes. Translocation of fish across borders occurs Industry Association of Australia (PIAA) has with impunity and no-one, apart from some major supported this review of the ornamental fish trade. wholesale businesses and hobby groups, really knows The PIAA, in association with state and territory which species are being traded in Australia, or the governments, has committed to the implementation of numbers of prohibited or noxious fish being bred and this report’s recommendations, to ensure that the traded in the industry. industry has an economically sound and environmentally sustainable future. Ornamental fish present a significant risk to aquatic systems in Australia and have the potential to trigger This report contains seven recommendations for the or contribute to a future major aquatic pest or future management and regulation of the ornamental disease incursion, particularly in freshwater habitats. fish trade in Australia (see page 24). The Ornamental This document does not specifically discuss disease Fish Policy Working Group, which researched the risks associated with ornamental fish as those risks are industry and developed the recommendations, subject to separate review by Biosecurity Australia and recognises that unless there is a consistent, national the National Aquatic Animal Health Committee. approach to regulate and manage the industry, the ad hoc approach taken to date will continue, with the A number of populations of exotic or non-endemic likely outcome of further exotic invasions and disease ornamental fish species are established in Australia, threats to Australian and aquaculture and these ‘pests’ are seriously impacting on industries. biodiversity in our freshwater systems. Some aquatic plants, such as Caulerpa taxifolia (which was traded The recommendations of the report address the need in the aquarium industry until recently), can have for a nationally recognised noxious species list and devastating effects on marine systems if released, and new management frameworks for the ornamental future escapes and invasions need to be avoided. sector as a whole. The report also recognises the importance of improved communication with all Many fish species in the trade are not on the current stakeholders and the wider community through a national permitted species lists established under Part comprehensive communication plan. 13A of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 or covered by quarantine At its 11th Meeting on the 24 November 2006, The regulations. It may be that such species have been Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council permitted under previous statutory arrangements, but endorsed this report and agreed to provide funding to they are no longer on the list and are unlikely to have implement the key recommendations. been assessed for their potential risk to the

A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

Worldwide, the keeping of ornamental fish in aquaria There is an active but difficult to quantify unregulated is a popular hobby; aquaria are a regular sight in trade in fish within hobby associations and between many homes and in workplaces and other public enthusiasts. Given data for the United Kingdom which spaces. In the United Kingdom, for example, the estimates that about 7% of hobbyists keep more than population of pet fish is estimated to be 140 million, 100 fish (over 40% of the total number of pet fish or about two and a half times the human population. owned) and indications that this trend is global, it is In Australia, the total pet fish population is not reasonable to assume that there is a significant known but it undoubtedly totals many millions, with unregulated and (officially) unrecorded trade in fish just over 15.5 million fish being imported during between hobbyists in Australia. This view is certainly 2005. About 97% of these imports were freshwater supported by the anecdotal information available in species. club bulletins, magazines and aquarium websites. In Australia, it is also estimated that between 12% With many millions of fish being transported around and 14% of the population participate in the aquarist the globe, many well beyond their natural range, hobby at some level (Patrick 1998). The Australian importation of aquarium fish is seen by many aquarium industry is relatively small, with total countries as a major potential source of invasive turnover at the retail level estimated to be about $65 species (McDowall 2004). Recent studies (Lintermans million. Approximately 1500 retailers ( and 2004) suggest that approximately 34 exotic freshwater pet shops) across Australia deal in aquarium fish. species have established populations in Australia; the According to the Pet Industry Association of Australia pathway for 22 of these species is thought to have (PIAA) approximately 60% of aquarium fish are been the ornamental fish industry. Given the well- supplied domestically by local breeders; the other demonstrated difficulties in eradicating species once 40% are imported. they are established, the sound investment of resources requires a focus on effective management and control both of new species coming into Australia and of those already known to be circulating in the trade and hobby associations within the country.

2 A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA A number of key challenges have been identified in – improve aquarium dealers’ access to information progressing a national approach to the management of about differing regulations across jurisdictions, ornamental fish. The points below are far from all- including notification of changes to prohibited inclusive, but summarise some of the key issues that species lists; and have been raised in recent years: – disseminate information to those dealers and • Within jurisdictions, a lack of personnel adequately hobbyists who are outside existing formal trained to identify aquarium species (fish and networks (e.g. professional associations). aquatic plants) is leading to ineffective monitoring • There is a strong informal system of trade among of aquarium retailers and hobbyists. hobbyists, which is currently unrecorded and • Listed plants and aquatic organisms (both unregulated. While formal regulation of this sector prohibited and permitted) need to be revised to may not be necessary, the capacity to develop clarify the status and actions required for many networks for the collection and dissemination of species already in the country. This information information (particularly about pests and animal also needs to be published and made broadly health issues) is important for future strategic available to regulators and stakeholders. management. • A system is needed that recognises aquarium • A concise guide to the variations in regulations and industry and large- hobby operators who are permitted species between jurisdictions is needed to not covered by existing state and territory fisheries reduce confusion and abuse of the system. or aquaculture regulations. This is not to create Interstate trade and other cross-border movement unnecessary regulatory burdens, but rather to: of aquarium specimens are currently inadequately – facilitate effective and timely dissemination of controlled. information to all sectors within the aquarium Inconsistencies between jurisdictions in the regulation industry—information from government about of aquarium fish species have meant that many species matters affecting the industry has often been that have managed to bypass import control slow to reach it under current arrangements; arrangements (i.e. species smuggled, or legally imported under previous legislation) can be, and frequently are, openly traded commercially and

A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA 3 among hobbyists. Currently, through one avenue or Key issues arising from this meeting included concerns another, any exotic fish species sought is effectively about: available in Australia. • the large number of ornamental species in the A recent review (McNee 2002) suggested that over country that are not on the permitted list under the 1100 exotic ornamental fish species are in Australia. EPBC Act As the ‘permitted import’ list under Part 13A of the • the disease and pest status of that may Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation have entered the country illegally Act 1999 (EPBC Act) currently lists only 481 species or genera that have been assessed as permitted • inconsistencies between jurisdictions in legislation imports, it is clear many species were either here and policy relating to permitted/noxious species and before the Act was passed or have entered the country effective controls illegally. Uncertainty about these species and how best • the effectiveness of current border controls to to regulate them was one of the driving factors in the prevent illegal imports of species and consequent establishment of a national review of the ornamental potential animal health risks. fish trade. These issues were summarised in a report submitted to the third meeting of the Australian Fisheries Managers Need for a national approach Forum (AFMF). Having reviewed the paper at its fourth meeting, on On 13 September 2002, Australian Government and 14 July 2003, the AFMF agreed to pursue the State/Territory fisheries agency representatives met development of a national strategic approach on aquarium industry representatives and officers from ornamental/exotic fish to address these matters. The Environment Australia (now the Department of the meeting also agreed that it should form a national Environment and Water Resources, DEW) and policy working group to further this aim. Biosecurity Australia (BA) in Coffs Harbour, New Subsequently, the Marine and Coastal Committee of South Wales to get a better overall picture of the the Natural Resource Management Standing aquarium industry and to find a practical way to deal Committee (MACC) endorsed this approach at its with the issues of pests and diseases within the seventh meeting on 16 July 2003. aquarium fish trade. The Ornamental Fish Policy Working Group (OFPWG) consisted of representatives from state and territory fisheries agencies, all Australian Government agencies with responsibility for ornamental fish importation and animal health, and representatives of the industry and hobby sectors. The full membership of the OFPWG is listed in Appendix 1.

4 A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA Terms of reference species used in aquaria. Comments on aquatic plants and ‘live rock’ were included because The key objectives for the development of a nationally they have been identified as significant potential pest agreed approach on aquarium fish addressed in this issues within the aquarium industry, but they have not plan are: been reviewed in any detail. A full review of aquatic 1 the development of a strategic plan for management invertebrates, such as those occurring on or as live for ornamental fish1 in Australia; rock, would potentially be as large a task as for fish, but there is little or no background information on 2 the development of a national list of high-risk such species. noxious species; Marine species currently make up a small proportion 3 the development of a national exempt list (low risk) of the trade (<5%). Most of the current permitted of species permitted in the ornamental fish trade2; import listings for marine species under the EPBC Act 4 a process for assessing the risks3 associated with are at the family or level, which means that any any species currently in Australia that may not have clarification of the risk status of specific species in the previously been assessed; country would be a significant task. 5 a process for dealing with species already in the The OFPWG has been cooperating with the National country deemed to be undesirable, including but Introduced Marine Pest Coordinating Group, which not limited to recall/removal/licensing, monitoring, has agreed to consider the outcomes of this process on and surveillance; and ornamental fish as it applies to its work on the development of a national approach to introduced 6 consultation with stakeholder groups on the marine pests. implementation of proposed changes. The National Aquatic Animal Health Committee is Notwithstanding that fisheries legislation in most currently considering potential disease transmission jurisdictions includes aquatic invertebrates within the risks within the aquarium trade and this information definition of ‘fish’, the OFPWG made a conscious would be used in future assessments of fish imports. decision to focus this strategic plan primarily on

1 ‘Ornamental fish are defined here to include freshwater and marine invertebrates and vertebrates and ‘living rock’, but not plant species. Note that this report focuses primarily on freshwater fish.

2 This refers to low-risk species, within Australia, that may not be on the current permitted list.

3 Risks include potential risk to biodiversity and the potential for introduction of disease and parasites. Risks to biodiversity also include the introduction of native species outside their natural range (non-endemics).

A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA 5 CHAPTER 2 EXISTING CONTROLS

Currently, management and regulation of the • Part 2 is a list of live specimens that require an ornamental fish or aquarium trade occurs at two import permit from DEW under the EPBC Act. main levels: Imports of specimens from this part of the list may • The importation of fish into Australia is controlled also be subject to certain conditions or restrictions. at the Australian Government level by DEW and by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF) through the Australian Quarantine Applications to amend the list of and Inspection Service (AQIS). permitted imports • Commercial-scale domestic breeding, keeping and movement are controlled through state and If a species intended for live import does not currently territory legislation. appear on the list of specimens approved for live import, a person may apply to amend the list. A new species can be added to the list only after the potential Importation impacts of the species on the environment have been fully assessed to the satisfaction of the Minister for the Both the EPBC Act and the Quarantine Act 1908 Environment and Water Resources. regulate the import of live animals and plants into Australia. These Acts are administered by DEW and Details of the procedures for applying to amend the AQIS, respectively. It is important to note that list of specimens suitable for live import are available approval from both agencies may be required when on the DEW website.5 importing live specimens. Amending the list may take 6–12 months, depending Section 303(EB) of the EPBC Act establishes a list of on the complexity of the case. specimens that are approved for live import. If a species is not on the list, it cannot be legally imported The flow chart in Figure 1 is a simplified diagram of into Australia. The list of approved specimens is the steps involved in submitting an amendment for available on the DEW website.4 consideration. However, the process is currently under review, so the DEW website should be consulted for The list comprises two parts and covers both the most up-to-date information. unregulated and regulated imports:

• Part 1 is a list of live specimens that do not require an import permit under the EPBC Act. It may not include any specimen listed on the Convention on the International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES).

4 http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/trade-use/lists/import/index.html

5 http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/trade-use/lists/import/amend/index.html

6 A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA FIGURE 1 Flow chart of DEW live import process

AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY

APPLICANT DEW/MINISTER

Step 1 Step 2

Applicant submits an application DEW publishes draft terms of form and draft terms of reference reference on DEW website and to DEW. notifies stakeholders.

Step 3

Applicant addresses comment received and final terms of reference are agreed by minister.

Step 4 Step 5

Applicant prepares draft report DEW publishes draft report on DEW addressing agreed terms of website and notifies stakeholders reference. and appropriate state and territory ministers. DEW also provides independent input.

Step 6 Step 7

Applicant addresses stakeholder When the report is finalised, comments. minister makes a decision on amending the live import list and notifies applicant.

If the minister approves the Step 8 amendment, Applicant seeks an import permit from DEW If the minister approves the to import species. amendment, DEW tables instrument before both Houses of Parliament for 15 sitting days.

A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA 7 Roles and responsibilities of AQIS and State/Territory regulation Biosecurity Australia All states and territories have some controls in place All fish import permits are issued in Canberra by the to manage exotic fish in the aquarium trade, usually Live Animal Import Section of AQIS. The section is within the umbrella of fisheries regulation through responsible for assessing and issuing all live fisheries agencies. However, the controls are far from ornamental fish permits, providing import protocol comprehensive and are not necessarily tailored to the advice to AQIS regional officers and importers, and needs or concerns of the sector. In most jurisdictions, ensuring that all national documented information, larger commercial breeders of fish are usually required including work instructions and training packages, is to operate under conditions on an aquaculture licence. updated as required. The retail sector, however, does not fall specifically under fisheries regulation in most jurisdictions, and AQIS quarantine officers in each region implement the retailers would only be covered by industry codes of operational aspects. Their duties involve approval and practice if they are members of the PIAA. Membership registration of quarantine approved premises (QAPs), of the PIAA is voluntary. inspection of documentation and fish at point of entry, final inspection of tank records and fish at the QAP, The states and territories generally rely on one or both and release of fish from quarantine. of two mechanisms to regulate the aquarium fish trade—a prohibited species list and a permitted species AQIS verifies that the health certificates match the list. Under the former approach, authorities target fish import permit conditions and have been prepared by species that are recognised as pests (in the broadest the appropriate certifying authority. The fish are sense) and include them on a prohibited (or noxious) visually inspected to confirm that they are species on species list, usually making the possession of such fish the permitted import lists under the EPBC Act and illegal. quarantine regulations. Prohibited species lists are generally relatively short The fish must be contained in bags of single species and easy to enforce, however, they do not provide a and must be clearly visible to the inspector. Fish that mechanism to prevent trade in species whose pest risk appear to be healthy (active, with no obvious signs of status is unknown and which therefore do not appear disease) are directed to a QAP to undergo post-arrival on the list. Under this arrangement, fish that are not quarantine. Shipments or consignments of fish that are on the EPBC Act permitted import list and are not on obviously diseased are rejected and either re-exported a state or territory prohibited list can be owned and or destroyed at the importer’s expense. Full details of traded easily once they are in the country, as their quarantine requirements for particular species can be legal status is not specified in any legislation.7 Most of found in ICON, the AQIS import conditions database, the fish that are smuggled into Australia belong to this 6 which is available on the AQIS website. group, along with species that may have been Biosecurity Australia (BA) is responsible for imported into the country before the advent of developing and reviewing biosecurity policies and, on existing legislation. request, provides technical advice to AQIS about the Inconsistency between jurisdictions also compromises interpretation of those polices. BA is also responsible the efforts of individual jurisdictions to manage risks for assessing the competence of overseas authorities through restricting trade in potentially noxious and makes recommendations to AQIS about the species. In many cases, a fish that is prohibited in one recognition of those authorities. jurisdiction is freely available in neighbouring An application for the live import of a genetically jurisdictions and may be moved across borders modified fish (which is a genetically modified relatively freely by the public. Another difficulty is organism, or GMO) will be referred to the Office of inconsistency in applying noxious fish legislation as the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR). The OGTR demonstrated by some states allowing trade in undertakes a risk assessment process (based on the domesticated ‘Koi’ despite listing Cyprinus carpio effect of the genetic modification—not the organism as a noxious species. per se—on human health and the environment) and A further difficulty in controlling smuggling at borders issues a licence if risk is minimal. The import and enforcing existing prohibitions is the difficulty in consignment will still require an AQIS import permit identifying species permitted for import among the as well. If the OGTR refuses import of a GMO, the wide diversity of the world’s freshwater fish species. DEW and AQIS will defer to that decision. If the The identification of exotic ornamental fish species on GMO is approved for import, it must still undergo sight, particularly at all life stages, is a relatively AQIS and DEW assessment before import or addition specialised skill not always readily available in to permitted import lists. regulatory agencies. The permitted import system

6 http://www.aqis.gov.au/icon32/asp/homecontent.asp

7 Under the EPBC Act, it is an offence to be in possession of an individual specimen that was not legally imported.

8 A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA relies heavily on accurate records being provided with Table 1 summarises state, territory and Australian imported stock. However, it is suspected that government regulations relating to the declaration of individuals seeking to bypass regulations may simply noxious species and the capacity to recall or seize fish mix cryptic juvenile forms of prohibited species species. together with legitimate species.

TABLE 1 Summary of current legislation across jurisdictions used for the regulation and control of exotic fish

STATE LEGISLATION RESPONSIBLE CAPACITY CONTROL/ AGENCY TO DECLARE SEIZURE OF NOXIOUS SPP ANIMALS

ACT Nature Conservation Act 1980 Environment Fisheries Act 2000 ACT Pest Plants and Animals Act 2005

NSW Stock Diseases Act 1923 Dept. of Primary Fisheries Management Act 1994 Industries

NT Fisheries Act and Industry and Fisheries Regulations 1988

Qld Fisheries Act 1994 QDPI Fisheries Regulations 1995

SA Livestock Act 1997 PIRSA Fisheries Act 1982 declared under regulation exotic fish

Tas Living Marine Resources Act 1995 DPWIE Inland Fisheries Act 1995 IFC controlled spp

Vic Livestock Disease Control Act 1994 VDPI Fisheries Act 1995

WA Exotic Diseases of Animals Act 1993 Dept. of Agriculture Fish Resources Management Dept. of Fisheries Act 1994

Cwth Fisheries Management Act 1991 AFMA Quarantine Act 1908 AQIS Environment Protection and DEW s 301A has Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 provision for listing species that threaten biodiversity

A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA 9 Risk assessment framework While many other factors are thought to affect the probability of establishment, the advantage of using As indicated previously, a major concern is the the factors listed above is that information on most number of species already in Australia that have not is readily available in easily accessible sources been assessed for their pest or disease potential. The (e.g. Fishbase8). This allows relatively quick and policy arm of AQIS (now Biosecurity Australia) effective screening of large numbers of species. conducted an import risk analysis for ornamental fish DEW representatives on the OFPWG have indicated (AQIS 1999). However, this only covered species on that they now use this risk assessment model as part the permitted import list at the time and therefore did of their suite of tools for conducting assessments of not consider other species that may already have been potential risks of importing exotic live freshwater fish in the country, and are being bred and traded. species. The OFPWG also recommended that the The DEW’s statutory process for assessing the model could be used by a scientific/technical review environmental risks associated with live species group established to review ‘grey listed’ species. proposed for import into Australia can be time This report does not specifically examine the disease consuming. Moreover, many of the unassessed species risks associated with ornamental fish imports as those may currently be bred successfully here, so there is risks are subject to separate review by BA and the little need to import fresh stock. National Aquatic Animal Health Committee. The key to assessing the risks of a given species’ establishment in the environment is the identification of those factors that determine the probability of its successful establishment. Bomford (2003) developed a model for assessing the risks in Australia, from the import and keeping of exotic terrestrial vertebrates. The model was developed following a review of past introductions to determine the factors most likely to influence successful establishment of a species in the wild. Unfortunately, this report did not consider any fish species among the vertebrate pests reviewed. The DEW has recently concluded a consultancy with the author of this model to develop a risk assessment model for the establishment of freshwater and estuarine fish (Bomford and Glover 2004). The review of the risk assessment model for terrestrial vertebrates found that the established framework was an effective tool for measuring risk of establishment (as tested against species known to have established, versus those that have been released but failed to establish). The key factors identified for determining establishment risk in exotic fish are: • number of release events • climate match • history of establishing feral populations elsewhere • size of overseas geographical range • taxonomic group.

8 http://www.fishbase.org/

10 A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA CHAPTER 3 NOXIOUS SPECIES

Of the 34 alien fish species that have established feral All jurisdictions assessed this list of species populations in Australian waters, 22 are thought to independently and results were compiled to form the have come into the country via the ornamental fish agreed list. Uniform criteria for listing were not trade (Lintermans 2004). However, it should also be predetermined, however, reasons were provided when noted that feral populations of some fish species, such a species was proposed as noxious, and these followed as salmonids, were deliberately introduced and are the primary criteria by which potential ‘pestiness’ of a maintained in the wild to provide recreational species is determined. These include aggressive opportunities and tourism. It is commonly accepted in behaviour; piscivorous diet; high fecundity and/or invasive species management theory that eradication frequent spawning and long life span (i.e. effective of species once they are established is difficult, if not reproductive potential); potentially large size; broad impossible, and that the most (cost) effective habitat tolerances; and similar environmental management is achieved through the prevention and requirements to native species. Meeting one of these management of introduction and spread. criteria alone was not sufficient to qualify a species as As noted previously, changes to regulations relating to noxious; those species proposed for addition to a permitted imports and permitted and noxious species national list met many, if not all, of the criteria. lists across Australia have created significant The compiled lists (see Appendix 2) are the outcome uncertainty within government and industry and of deliberations within the OFPWG and feedback among hobbyists about the status of many species from consultations held with key scientific and already here (and, in many cases, still actively traded industry stakeholders across jurisdictions. The only in industry and hobby circles). Attempting to remove species that have been included in the proposed some of this uncertainty, particularly in the context of noxious list are those to which all OFPWG members identifying future potentially invasive species and agreed. It should be noted that some states may have regulating them accordingly, was one of the key additional species on their particular noxious species drivers in the formation of the OFPWG. listings due to different climatic conditions across One of the terms of reference of the OFPWG was to jurisdictions. develop a nationally agreed list of high-risk noxious Where there was not unanimous agreement on the species. A number of noxious species lists are status of a species, it was added to what is described currently in use across jurisdictions. These range from in this report as the ‘grey’ list. Species on the grey list those containing a few species to comprehensive lists. require further scientific review and investigation to When the OFPWG was formed, both Queensland and determine whether they should be added to, or Victoria were in the process of reviewing their noxious exempted from, a national noxious species list in the species listings. Both jurisdictions agreed to utilise the future. MACC process to progress their deliberations, with a It should be noted that the species currently on the view to adopting any nationally agreed noxious grey list are those that were being considered by species list. The starting point for consideration of the jurisdictions for possible addition to their own nationally agreed list was a compilation of existing noxious species lists. During the public consultation jurisdictional lists, including the species proposed for process for this strategy there was considerable addition in Queensland and Victoria. representation from Koi carp producers and societies expressing concern about Cyprinus carpio being on a

A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA 11 national noxious species list. Whereas ‘European’ or As the DEW uses the risk assessment framework ‘common’ carp are an acknowledged pest in wild outlined in Chapter 2 as one of its tools for future live habitats, are declared noxious by several states and import determinations, there is a reasonable are a nationally prohibited import, domesticated Koi expectation that the assessments conducted through carp are widely cultivated/kept in Australia. Hence, the scientific/technical working group could be utilised the OFPWG recommended that ‘domesticated Koi in future DEW assessments, thereby potentially carp’ be placed on the grey list until a method of reducing the timeframe for the live import assessment resolving this intra-species problem is agreed. process. If, however, a species is found to fall outside Similarly, the OFPWG acknowledged that alligator the scope of the existing BA–AQIS ornamental fish (Lepisosteus spp) are being bred in Australia risk assessment (AQIS 1999), the species would also and proposed moving these species from the proposed need to undergo risk assessment by BA. noxious to grey list for further review. It was noted during the public consultation process Recent reviews of ornamental species thought to be in that fish on all lists, permitted, noxious or grey, the country (McNee 2002) list many species that are should be described at species level. Listing at the not on the current permitted import lists and that do genus or family level should be avoided in future not appear on either of the proposed lists. Potentially, listings. The current list of permitted imports these species should be added to the grey list (along established under the EPBC Act has a number of with any other species that subsequently come to light genus and family level listings, which are currently in the trade or hobby sectors) for further review and under review by DEW. clarification of their status. The OFPWG was also tasked with investigating other Any species proposed for addition to the live import potential risks in the aquarium trade, including live list under the EPBC Act would still be required to be rock and aquarium plants. Details of the group’s assessed for potential environmental risk, consistent considerations of those matters are provided below. with the requirements of that legislation. Live rock Proposed action ‘Live rock’ is material considered to include live coral, With the endorsement of the proposed national live sand and coral rubble. According to Oz Reef noxious species list by the Natural Resource Marine Park (1997) and Fossa and Neilsen (1997), Management Standing Committee, a process is being coral rock is colonised and burrowed through by developed to gather information and assess the status various organisms, such as: of species on the grey list. This is a national priority • bacteria if management and control of ornamental fish across Australia is to be successful. • unicellular animals (Protozoa) The OFPWG proposed that a scientific/technical • sponges (Porifera) working group be established, drawing relevant • soft and hard corals (cnidarians) expertise from around the country (academia, museums, government, industry and private sector) to • flatworms (Platyhelminthes) conduct assessments of these species. The proposal is • threadworms (Nematoda) that grey list species will be put through the risk • ringed worms, annelids (Annelida) assessment framework outlined in Chapter 2, with the scientific/technical working group providing • peanut worms (Sipunculida) information on species (although detailed information • crustaceans (crabs, shrimps, other Crustacea) will be limited for many species) and ultimately • sea spiders (Pycnogonida) deciding the status of species guided by the outcome of the risk assessments. It is critical that the PIAA and • molluscs (clams, nudibranchs, snails, chitons, other representatives of the hobby sector are directly Mollusca) involved in this process, or acceptance of the process • bryozoans (Bryozoa) and the outcome by the wider ornamental fish/aquarium trade will be unlikely. • entoprocts (Entoprocta) Those species that have been through the assessment • starfish, brittle stars, (echinoderms) process and are not considered for addition to the • sea squirts (ascidians) national noxious species list would then constitute a • algae (including coralline, micro and macro algae). group of low-risk species known to be in the trade or hobby sectors. It would then be up to individuals or industry, should they so desire, to have the species assessed by the DEW and BA for addition to the permitted import list.

12 A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA The use of live rock in marine aquaria is considered a Potential management options natural method of filtration to remove the pollution caused when uneaten food, excreta and other alien Management options to address marine pest risks matter breaks down into nitrogen gas and forms from live rock should be developed in conjunction nitrates (Hargreaves 1978). with the National Introduced Marine Pests Because of the costs of collection, protective Coordination Group. Although the risks of the spread packaging and shipping, live rock is an expensive way of marine pests through the trade in live rock and of cycling the tank, compared with other methods associated aquarium products are likely to be minor in such as adding ammonia directly to the tank or using comparison with risks from other activities (e.g. the mechanical filters. Only the more enthusiastic and trade in species with identified pest potential), several dedicated aquarists maintain marine aquaria, but live potential management options could be considered: rock use is considered to be increasing in Australia. • Improved education of public and industry about Information provided by the various state and the risk of dumping unwanted fish where they territory fisheries agencies indicates that most live could end up in waterways, and the risk of rock and coral collected in Australia originates from microscopic organisms/spores from live rock Queensland reefs. Smaller amounts are harvested from entering waterways when tanks are cleaned. reefs in Western Australia and the Northern Territory. • Improved monitoring of and information sharing The consultation draft of this document indicated that on the distribution of marine pests. between 12 to 23 tonnes were harvested annually, but • Increased regulation of the trade in live rock within feedback during the public consultation process Australia. This could involve tracing the movement indicated that the actual amount was significantly of live rock between states and territories, possibly higher. Queensland/GBRMPA have just introduced a through a permitting/licensing process. The comprehensive live rock logbook and Western prospect of effective control/compliance of illegal Australia are in the process of better regulating this imports would also have to be considered. industry, so more accurate harvest/trade figures should be available in future. • Certifying cultured products, which could involve enhancement of artificial culturing of live rock (see The risks of introducing exotic species and diseases Box 1). The rock to be seeded would also need to through the movement of live rock have yet to be be collected locally, taken from the terrestrial quantified. As most live rock originates in tropical environment or artificially created. There would marine waters and is destined for markets in need to be ways of sanitising the rock or certifying temperate Australia, the tropical species in and on the what would grow when the rock is introduced to a rock would be unlikely to establish viable populations tank. in temperate southern waters. If an exotic pest or disease establishes in an area of Australia from which A descriptive paper on live rock in Australia was live rock is sourced, the potential for translocation prepared for the OFPWG and is held at the Bureau of arises if the pest is not detected and contained, or if Rural Sciences, Canberra. there is no process for tracking live rock from the point of collection to its final destination. It is illegal under the EPBC Act to import species from overseas into any part of Australia, other than those species listed as approved for importation (this is enforced by AQIS and the Australian Customs Service). As some live rock potentially carries a wide array of unknown species, it is not a permissible import; this restriction must be continued, unless a thorough risk assessment suggests otherwise. It is not known whether an illegal ‘black trade’ in imported live rock exists and this possibility cannot be ruled out.

A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA 13 BOX 1 Aquatic plants Culture of live rock in the United States The OFPWG also considered the issue of known noxious weeds being traded within the aquarium industry. Problems arising from ornamental aquatic Due to the large amounts of coral rock being plants are well documented, particularly through the exported from the Florida Keys in the early 1990s, Florida banned the harvest of live rock from its work of the Cooperative Research Centre for waters in 1997. As a result, marine ornamental Australian Weed Management (the Weeds CRC), the companies in the United States started to develop Australian Weeds Committee and state and territory aquaculture for live rock. To ‘create’ live rock, agencies. ordinary dry rock is placed in the ocean and Good summaries of nationally noxious aquatic plants harvested one to several years later. and those that are considered problems in particular Live rock can be purchased either ‘cured’ or jurisdictions can be found at the websites of the New ‘uncured’. On collection from the ocean, the rocks South Wales Department of Natural Resources9 and harbour a large variety of sea life, some of which the National Weeds Strategy10. The Australian Weeds (such as certain species of anemones and mantis Committee has produced a list of key noxious aquatic shrimp) are common pests on live rock. ‘Uncured’ rock is rock that has been collected and directly plant species and this is provided in Appendix 3 of exported. ‘Cured’ rock, on the other hand, is material this report. that has been placed under a fine spray of highly A limited survey of plants for sale in the aquarium saline water for several hours or days before export. industry (including those sold as pond plants for The objective is to keep the coralline algae alive but outdoor use) indicated the availability of about a kill and wash out less hardy, unwanted organisms, dozen species listed as weeds, either nationally or in which would foul the tank water. one or more jurisdictions. The OFPWG acknowledged that it did not have extensive expertise in water plants, but recognised the need to establish national linkages between groups currently working on noxious aquatic plants (such as the Weeds CRC) and to encourage a review of ornamental aquatic plants. Further, fisheries agencies and their enforcement officers need to develop the capacity (training, field guides, etc) to recognise noxious plant species that they may encounter in dealings with the aquarium industry.

9 http://www.dnr.nsw.gov.au/water/wetlands_facts_weeds.shtml#NationalSignificance

10 http://www.weeds.org.au

14 A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA CHAPTER 4 PROPOSED REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

The breeding and sale of ornamental fish is being BOX 2 controlled and regulated in a number of different ways by the various jurisdictions, ranging from When is a hobby a business? internal policy arrangements through to legislative arrangements. Currently, there is no consistency of approach across Australia, which creates uncertainty The courts have provided some guidelines to help among both industry and the general public about the determine whether an activity is a business or a hobby, but there are no hard and fast rules. The movement and sale of fish between states and Australian Taxation Office looks at all the territories. Existing regulations specific to the circumstances of a case in determining whether a ornamental fish industry across jurisdictions are business exists. Guidelines adopted by the courts summarised in Appendix 4. include the following: One major issue is that the largest sector in the • Does the activity have a significant commercial industry is the hobbyist or enthusiast group. The purpose or character? policy or regulatory boundary between a ‘hobby’ and • Does the person have more than just an intention a ‘commercial activity’ is blurred and open to various to engage in business? interpretations. Currently, there is no clear direction • Does the person have a purpose of profit as well as from the jurisdictions on this matter. However, it is a prospect of profit? important to recognise that this strategy is primarily focused on large-scale operators who are breeding • Is there repetition and regularity to the activity? large numbers of fish, not the local hobbyist with a • Is the activity of the same kind and carried on in a small number of fish in a tank in their home. similar manner to businesses in that industry? In some jurisdictions, there is friction between licensed • Is the activity planned, organised and carried on in commercial aquaculture operators and ‘backyard’ a businesslike manner? breeders. In general, the main complaint from licensed • What are the size, scale and permanency of the aquaculture operators is that they are required to activity? obtain development consents from local government, • Is the activity better described as a hobby, pay licence or permit fees to state regulatory bodies, recreation or sporting activity? and pay appropriate taxes. The backyard breeder or hobbyist might not obtain such approvals, nor pay such charges. For example, public Koi carp auctions are a regular event in NSW. This results in tough The reasons for seeking to regulate the ornamental competition in the ornamental fish market, allows fish trade in Australia include: ‘noxious’ fish to be freely traded without much • to provide a communication capability (distribution chance of detection, and creates an obvious pest lists) to industry breeders and stakeholders for and disease risk. current information and educational materials on management issues; • to provide an avenue through which to monitor and control disease (including point-of-import records to determine possible trends or to give advance warning of potential disease problems with offshore suppliers);

A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA 15 • to ensure that all appropriate local and state Regulation of pet shops government regulatory requirements are being met (publicity about poor adherence to regulatory Pet shops in most jurisdictions are not required to be requirements by a licensed operator may also reflect licensed or registered by fisheries agencies, and may badly on other licensed operators); only require licensing by local government or the • to confirm the status of species being traded; jurisdiction’s environmental protection agency, if they dispose of wastewater to the sewerage system or the • to address the minority of illegal operators; and environment. • to reduce or eliminate smuggling distribution points The PIAA has developed a voluntary code of practice for noxious fish or endangered species. for its members. The association is also working In most jurisdictions, the keeping and/or trading towards an accreditation scheme whereby member of pets is controlled by various means, which may operators would have the option of going through a include: series of training programmes to achieve accredited operating standards and also submit to an auditing • restrictions on numbers that may be kept by regime to ensure that standards are being maintained. individuals in urban areas, and licensing While these schemes would only apply to member arrangements for those wishing to keep more than premises, if accreditation programmes are successful the permitted numbers (e.g. breeding kennels or in improving standards of operation, it is hoped that poultry breeders); commercial pressure would mean that accreditation • licensing arrangements for the keeping of native will have significant financial benefit and there will be fauna; an incentive to pursue it. Details of the code of practice are in Appendix 5. • licensing arrangements for the keeping of exotic animals; and • licensing arrangements for the keeping of noxious Decision support trees for regulation of the or pest species. ornamental fish trade and hobby sectors Therefore, the precedent of regulating hobbyists is already in place for non-aquatic animals, and The decision trees in Figures 2 and 3 have been regulation of the aquarium fish trade may fit in with developed to help jurisdictions consistently classify other pet industry sectors. That said, the regulation operations into particular sectors of the ornamental applied at this level is usually low cost and may fish industry. They do not provide prescriptive simply be a one-off or annual permit, or even a regulatory frameworks because, in many cases, voluntary registration through some form of online control may fall outside formal regulatory system. There is a need for some form of national frameworks. Instead, they require individual labelling scheme and this would involve close liaison jurisdictions to examine their existing regulatory with all stakeholders. Registration would assist with frameworks and amend them as necessary to provide compliance, disease control and communication a consistent framework across Australia. programmes. The decision trees provide regulators, those in the The aim of regulation at this level is not to raise ornamental fish industry and hobby sector, and the revenue or to apply ‘zero tolerance’, but to establish general public with simple pathways for determining networks through which information can be gathered how a particular activity should be classified. Working and distributed for better long-term management through the first tree (Figure 2), for example, it is (e.g. disease or pest notifications, changes to obvious that a person trading the odd fish with fellow regulation, permitted/prohibited species). hobbyists or at a local fete is not running an ornamental fish business. Similarly, following that line Similarly, the classification of large-scale breeding through the second tree, it is clear that regulatory activity in the hobby sector as aquaculture under state agencies would only be interested in the activities of regulations is not an attempt to leverage licence fees that person if they were keeping and/or breeding from non-commercial operations, but rather to ensure particular species (either noxious or determined to be consistency of accountability and traceability of of special interest after the assessment process), or to product across all large-scale producers for the provide the person with general information of purposes of future management. In some jurisdictions, interest (new permitted/prohibited species, known this may require minor regulatory changes to disease or pest issues, etc). recognise different classes of aquaculturalists for licensing/levy purposes. The OFPWG concurred The note at the bottom of the second tree (Figure 3) is that, given adequate communication and education, important. There have been concerns that, under this self-regulation is the most effective option for the decision framework, large hobby operations could fall hobby sector. within the water volume criteria to be considered for a state or territory aquaculture permit. Most concern

16 A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA stems from the costs associated with the permit system in those jurisdictions without such a system. The in some jurisdictions. During discussions with tiered permit system would create a minor registration jurisdictional aquaculture regulators, it was recognised permit, possibly based on additional criteria such as that this is a minor issue that can be clarified by the ‘qualifying as operating a business’ (see Box 2). introduction (in regulations) of a tiered permit system NO Pets NO YES Hobby Barter/trade (not for cash) (not for Barter/trade YES INTENDED FOR SALE INTENDED FOR Grower/wholesaler/importer YES Sell to trade Sell to NO Hobby NO YES Sell through advertisement/retail outlet advertisement/retail Sell through Considered as Considered operation retail purpose of for regulation FIGURE 2 Classification of activities on the basis of the sale/trade of fish of activities on the basis sale/trade Classification

A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA 17 8ASTRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE 18 FIGURE 3 Ornamental fish regulation decision tree

EXISTING AQUACULTURE PERMIT (FISHERIES) FOR FACILITIES

YES NO

Planning/environmental/

MANAGEMENT OFORNAMENTAL FISH Council approvals for facility

NO YES

Is fish breeding actively taking place?

Breed for sale YES NO

YES NO Sale to public?

Volume of water Association IN AUSTRALIA >10 000 litres* membership YES NO

Retail YES NO YES NO Wholesale May consider State Aquaculture Permit#

Industry Applicable State Hobby Pets accreditation Hobby Aquaculture Permit# program May require registration for certain spp

May require Info distributed registration for through retailers Registration Public aquaria certain spp with sale with State code of practice Comply with appropriate State regulations

* Tank or pond water used for culture Import # ‘Applicable State Aquaculture Permit’ refers to the regulatory framework operating within a jurisdiction. AQIS certification for quarantine In many jurisdictions there is a tiered system whereby full regulation would only be applied to large approved facilities commercial operators while smaller operations might only be registered (for a minimal fee). CHAPTER 5 MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL PESTS AND NOXIOUS SPECIES IN AUSTRALIA

In developing a regulatory framework for ornamental and guidelines such as those outlined in Table 2, fish, it is important to recognise the diversity of regulation should have much in common across players involved, including aquaculturalists, breeders, jurisdictions. wholesalers, importers, retailers, and hobbyists and The next stage in the process would be the enthusiasts. To date, discussions on regulation have establishment of an implementation plan to guide the focused on the need to improve knowledge of the adoption of the nationally agreed approaches outlined species of fish available, and of when and where they in this strategy and to address cross-jurisdictional are being traded. With the development of a new issues, such as translocation and movement and national noxious species list to supplement import regulatory or licensing requirements for such actions. lists, there will also be a need to create clarity and Nationally agreed guidelines for the translocation of certainty about those species that can be possessed live aquatic organisms already exist (MCFFA 1999); and traded, particularly for species considered noxious there are also existing regulatory frameworks for the that are already in the country. movement of other live animal species across The decision trees in Figures 2 and 3 are an attempt to Australian jurisdictions, and these may well guide the develop pathways to: development of such arrangements for exotic fish. • classify an operation type on the basis of sales of or Regulations controlling movements should trade in fish; and complement the national translocation policy. • determine the level of regulation that should be An implementation plan would also need to finalise applied in different situations. appropriate reporting arrangements to review progress on the implementation of agreed actions within the The next stage of regulation of aquarium species is the strategic plan. Much of the on-ground implementation development of a process for dealing with those will fall to jurisdictional fisheries agencies. However, species that it is determined should be removed or because of the close links between this work and controlled. Table 2 is a summary of options derived current work on marine pests and aquatic disease from discussions by the OFPWG. risks, it will be important to ensure that longer term It will be necessary to develop an agreed set of arrangements maintain those linkages. Close liaison decision rules that can be incorporated into the with groups such as the Aquatic Animal Health regulatory framework to support existing regulatory Committee, Biosecurity Australia and the Australian arrangements within jurisdictions. Where there is no Weeds Committee should be fostered and maintained. existing framework, these decision rules may form the Marine species represent only a small proportion of basis of new regulation. the total aquarium trade, but some species that may be imported or translocated could have a significant This strategic planning document sets out a impact on Australia’s marine environment if released. framework for future management of ornamental fish. Actions involving ornamental marine species should For most issues, implementation will mainly occur be developed in conjunction with the National within individual jurisdictions. Assuming that national Introduced Marine Pests Coordination Group to agreement is reached on national noxious species lists ensure that they are integrated into the National

A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA 19 System for the Prevention and Management of Marine Options available for management of undesirable Pest Incursions. This system should develop a noxious species fall into three categories, as broadly ornamental marine species list, assess risks from the summarised in Table 2 : translocation of live rock, and improve the • nationally agreed noxious species; information available on marine species that are or might be traded in Australia. Communications • jurisdiction-specific noxious species; and activities should be developed to ensure consistency • high-value species or those listed by the Convention with the National System and to take advantage of on International Trade in Endangered Species established networks in the aquarium industry. (CITES) or the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN).

TABLE 2 Options available for management of undesirable species

ACTIONS SPECIES STATUS

NATIONAL JURISDICTION CITES COMMENTS NOXIOUS SPECIFIC IUCN NOXIOUS RARE

Education/ awareness Y Y Y Preparation and distribution of consistent information

Amnesty Y N N First option for noxious species removal after agreement of noxious fish list

Buyback Y N N Alternate option for more valuable species or added incentive

Permit Y* NY# Used for CITES, display (public aquaria etc), research and high value species already in the country*

Registration N Y Y#

Ban Y N Y# Second tier consideration, would need a well developed enforcement plan (national agreement)

Sterilise Y## N N Limited situations (linked to permits above) Microchip Y## NY

No sale Y N Y Always. Would also be listed as permit conditions. (Breeding may be permissible in research situations with conditions on permit re handling)

No translocation Y N Y

No breeding Y N N

Report existence Y Y Y Mandatory requirement

* limited life of animal in high value/cultural significance cases only # regulations exist ## mandatory conditions in restricted permitting situations

20 A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA At the appropriate time, consideration should be given invasion risk for Australia, may or may not have to categorising fish species placed on the noxious list already invaded Australia, and whose early in a manner consistent with the categories that may be detection will enable cost-effective eradication. developed under the National Weeds Strategy and the • National Alert List: Comprised of invasive species National Pest Animal Strategy. The Senate Inquiry on of national importance that are naturalised, have a Invasive Species report, published as Turning back the restricted range, are predicted to have a major tide—the invasive species challenge, suggested three impact on the environment or industries, and national invasive species control classes that could be whose eradication is feasible and cost-effective. established. Lists could be developed under these classes and agreed by the Australian and all State and • National Control List: Comprised of invasive Territory governments. The three control classes are species of national importance that are naturalised included here. However, it is understood that no and generally widespread, are having a major decision has as yet been made on their official use: impact on the environment or industry, and whose containment or control will assist protect the values • National Quarantine List: Comprised of invasive of areas of national environmental significance. species of national importance that are a high

TABLE 3 Proposed Uniform National Invasive Species Control Classes

NATIONAL DESCRIPTION STATUTORY RESPONSIBILITY NOXIOUS REQUIREMENT SPECIES LIST CLASSES

National Invasive species of national Prohibited import into Australia Australian Government Quarantine List importance that are a high Listed as controlled species under State and Territory governments invasion risk for Australia and State/Territory laws Australian, State and Territory not known to be present in Prohibited for trade nationally governments Australia, and whose early Early warning surveillance Australian, State and Territory detection will enable cost programmes governments effective eradication Eradication programme Australian and appropriate State (where detected and feasible) and Territory governments

National Invasive species of national Prohibited import into Australia Australian Government Alert List importance that are naturalised, Listed as controlled species under State and Territory governments have a restricted range, are State/Territory laws Australian, State and Territory predicted to have a major Prohibited for trade nationally governments impact on the environment, Early warning surveillance Australian, State and Territory human welfare or industries, programmes governments and which may be, is currently, Eradication programmes Australian and appropriate State or was, subject to a State or (where appropriate) and Territory governments national eradication effort Containment programmes Australian, State, Territory and (where appropriate) local governments

National Invasive species of national Prohibited import into Australia Australian Government Control List importance that are naturalised Listed as controlled species under State and Territory governments and generally widespread are State/Territory laws Australian, State and Territory having a major impact on the Prohibited for trade nationally governments environment or industry, and National Control Action Plan Australian, and appropriate State whose containment or control and Territory governments will assist protect the values of areas of national environmental significance

Source: Australian Biosecurity Group (2005)

A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA 21 There is also a need to harmonise inconsistent noxious fish classes into a uniform set of State and Territory invasive species control categories. This will greatly assist planning, evaluation and reporting.

TABLE 4 Proposed Uniform State and Territory Invasive Species Control Classes

UNIFORM STATE DESCRIPTION STATUTORY RESPONSIBILITY AND TERRITORY REQUIREMENT INVASIVE SPECIES CONTROL CLASSES

CLASS 1 Comprised of invasive species Prohibited from import and State/Territory government Quarantine and in other jurisdictions but not trade in jurisdiction Eradication List commonly present in own Subject to early warning State/Territory government jurisdiction, and if introduced surveillance would cause an adverse economic, environmental or Subject to eradication if State/Territory government, social impact found Land/water manager Notifiable Land/water manager

CLASS 2 Comprised of invasive species Prohibited from import and State/Territory government Containment List not commonly present in own trade in jurisdiction jurisdiction or regionally Subject to early warning State/Territory/local contained, which have, or surveillance on edge and government could have adverse economic, outside of containment area environmental or social impact May be subject to eradication State/Territory government or continual suppression Notifiable Land/water manager

CLASS 3 Comprised of invasive species Prohibited from import State/Territory governments Control List that are established in and trade jurisdiction and have, or could Conditions may apply to Merchants, land/water have an adverse economic, movement of contaminated managers environmental or social impact. materials Landowners must take Land/water managers reasonable steps to keep land/ water free of Class 3 pests Government agencies must State agencies, local take reasonable steps to keep governments land/water free of Class 3 pests

CLASS 4 Comprised of invasive species Prohibited from import State/Territory governments Restricted List whose trade would result in or trade spread in extent and/or abundance, and increase the probability of an adverse economic, environmental or social impact either within or without the jurisdiction

CLASS 5 Comprised of invasive species Regionally specific actions Local governments or Regional Declaration of regional importance regional bodies List

22 A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA CHAPTER 6 COMMUNICATION PLAN

An essential part of any strategic plan is a clear Queensland’s Ornamental Fish Can Become indication of the tools by which the plan’s messages Monumental Pests); other jurisdictions can benefit can be communicated to a range of audiences. The from the exchange of ideas and the development work keys to successful communication are to identify the that has already been done. messages and the target audiences and to ensure that The main objective of developing a communication the messages are appropriately constructed for the plan is to develop communications material that can audiences. Similarly, a range of communication tools be utilised by all Australian jurisdictions, thereby are available, and it is important to choose the reducing the cost and effort for each jurisdiction while medium that will most effectively get the message ensuring a consistent message across the country. This to the audience. Where possible, the communication can be achieved by: plan should link with associated communication strategies such as those promoting the National • development and delivery of training packages for System for the Prevention and Management of fisheries compliance staff to ensure that they can Marine Pest Incursions. identify particular ornamental species and understand the risks from those species; For the ornamental fish strategy, the target audience can be broadly divided into the general public and the • production of general educational materials (flyers industry sector. Hobbyists probably fall within both or posters that can be distributed through retail audiences (depending on the scale of their operation) outlets) on the risk posed by ornamental fish to and will therefore need access to the full range of marine and freshwater ecosystems and, importantly, information. what to do if fish are no longer wanted; A communication strategy is absolutely essential to • production of information sheets (fish minimise misinformation and produce community facts/notes/brochures) on species or groups of understanding and awareness about the potential species of particular significance that have threat of ornamental fish and plants to our established feral populations, providing detailed environment. Better communication between industry information for the community on the impacts of and regulators about the status of species and the those populations and details of control or provision of timely updates on changes in regulatory eradication programmes; arrangements will be key factors in improving hobby • further development of a cooperative working and trade practices. relationship with the aquarium industry, The key message for community education is that particularly via a joint ‘Don’t dump your aquarium ‘ornamental fish are wonderful pets, but they should fish’ campaign; and never be released into natural waterways’. The aim is • development of networks between regulators, to develop a range of material identifying noxious industry and major hobby groups to ensure that species, and giving tips about what to do with information on regulatory changes gets to the unwanted fish and what the individual can do to groups that need it, and also to provide for input to prevent spread of a pest species. Basic information the regulatory process by these stakeholders. brochures would be made available through aquarium retail outlets; industry representatives have indicated A communication strategy needs to be finalised as that they will cooperate by making this information part of a national implementation plan. available to new fish purchasers. Relevant material is already well developed in some jurisdictions (e.g.

A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA 23 CHAPTER 7 RECOMMENDATIONS AND NEXT STEPS

The strategic plan recommends the following actions Next steps to manage ornamental fish in Australia. 1 Agree on and adopt a national noxious species list An Ornamental Fish Management Implementation across all jurisdictions, noting links to existing lists Committee will be established to coordinate and lead and lists under development for marine pest species. the implementation of this national strategy. The plan needs to address the need for a process of consultation 2 Agree to review the status of fish on the ‘grey list’ with stakeholders, including: as a national priority. • national education on the new noxious species list 3 Establish a scientific/technical working group and the new regulatory and management reporting to the Natural Resource Management arrangements (government and industry to Standing Committee (through the Marine and communicate through agencies and customers); Coastal Committee), to conduct assessments of fish on the grey list over the next 2–3 years. • implementation of new regulatory arrangements by each jurisdiction; and 4 Adopt a regulatory framework and licensing to manage large fish-breeders and ornamental fish • agreement on management and funding importers in each state and territory. mechanisms to deal with noxious fish being traded and kept in the community. 5 Develop control mechanisms for the regulation and management of noxious fish and rare fish (e.g. A national communication plan will form a CITES listed) already in circulation in Australia, framework for delivery of many of these objectives. again noting links to control plans for marine pests The Marine and Coastal Committee will also need to of concern. consider the outcomes of the review by the Aquatic 6 Initiate a rigorous review of aquatic plants used in Animal Health Committee of disease risks associated the ornamental fish trade, in order to control and with ornamental fish when that review is finalised and regulate the spread of a number of recognised any implications the review may have for future aquatic pest species. management actions for the ornamental fish sector. 7 Implement a national communication strategy to raise awareness in the community and industry about the management, control and regulation of ornamental fish and invertebrates.

24 A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA REFERENCES

ABARE (Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Lintermans M (2004). Human-assisted dispersal of Resource Economics) (2004). Australian Fisheries alien freshwater fish in Australia. New Zealand Statistics 2003. ABARE, Canberra. Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 38:481–501. Australian Biosecurity Group (2005) Invasive Weeds, Pests and Diseases: Solutions to secure Australia. McDowall RM (2004). Shoot first, and then ask CRC for Pest Animal Control, CRC for Australian questions: a look at aquarium fish imports and Weed Management and WWF-Australia, Canberra. invasiveness in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 38:503–510. AQIS (Australian Quarantine and Inspection Service) (1999). Import Risk Analysis on Live Ornamental MCFFA (Ministerial Council on Forestry, Fisheries and Finfish. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra. Aquaculture) (1999). National Policy for the Translocation of Live Aquatic Organisms: Issues, Bomford M (2003). Risk Assessment for the Import Principles and Guidelines for Implementation. and Keeping of Exotic Vertebrates in Australia. Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra. Canberra. Bomford M and Glover J (2004). Risk assessment model McNee A (2002). A national approach to the for the import and keeping of exotic freshwater management of exotic fish species in the aquarium and estuarine finfish. Unpublished report to the trade: an inventory of exotic freshwater species. Department of the Environment and Heritage. Report to the Fisheries Resources Research Fund. Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra. Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra. Fossa SA and Neilsen AJ (1997). The Modern Coral Oz Reef Marine Park (1997). Live rock. Reef Aquarium, Volume 1. Ricordea Publishing. http://ozreef.org/reference/live_rock.html Hargreaves VB (1978). The Tropical Marine Patrick J (1998). Aquarium fish culture. In: Aquarium. AW and AH Reed, New York. Proceedings of the Queensland Warm water Aquaculture Conference (Status and Potential). Aquaculture Information Technologies, Taroom, Queensland.

A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA 25 APPENDIX 1 ORNAMENTAL FISH POLICY WORKING GROUP MEMBERSHIP

COMMONWEALTH

Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry • Fisheries and Aquaculture Branch • Bureau of Rural Sciences • Australian Quarantine Inspection Service – Animal and Plant Programme • Product Integrity, Animal and Plant Health • Biosecurity Australia Department of Environment and Water Resources • Approvals and Wildlife Division

STATE/TERRITORY

Environment ACT New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Northern Territory Department of Primary Industry, Fisheries and Mines Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries Department of Primary Industry and Resources, South Australia Inland Fisheries Service Tasmania Victoria Department of Primary Industries Western Australia Department of Fisheries

INDUSTRY/HOBBYIST

Pet Industry Association of Australia Ltd One independent aquarium hobby representative (Victoria) One commercial fish breeding representative (NSW)

26 A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA APPENDIX 2 NOXIOUS LIST AND GREY LIST SPECIES

NOXIOUS FISH (Noxious in all jurisdictions)

FAMILY SPECIFIC NAME COMMON NAME

Acestrorhynchidae Acestrorhynchus microlepis

Alestiidae Hydrocynus spp Pike characin Giant tigerfish

Amiidae Amia calva

Anabantidae Anabas testudineus Climbing

Bagridae Anaspidoglanis macrostoma Flatnose Bagrus ubangensis Ubangi shovelnose catfish

Centrarchidae — entire family Banded or spotted sunfish, largemouth bass, bluegill

Centropomidae Centropomus (12 spp) Snooks Lates microlepis Forktail lates Lates niloticus

Channidae Channa spp Snake head

Chacidae Chaca chaca Angler, frogmouth and squarehead

Characidae Colossoma spp Serrasalmus spp Redeye Pygocentrus spp Red piranha

Cichlidae Boulengerochromis microlepis Giant , yellow belly cichlid Oreochromis spp Tilapia Hemichromis fasciatus Banded jewelfish Sargochromis spp Pink, slender, greenwoods, mortimers, cunean and green happy Sarotherodon spp Melanotheron melanotheron Blackchin tilapia Serranochromis spp Tilapia spp. (All except T. buttikoferi) Redbelly tilapia

A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA 27 FAMILY SPECIFIC NAME COMMON NAME

Citharinidae entire subfamily Ichthyborinae African pike-characin, tubenose poacher, fin eater

Clariidae Clarias spp Walking catfish

Cobitidae Misgurnus anguillicaudatus Weatherloach

Cyprinidae Aristichthys nobilis Bighead carp Barbodes hexagonolepis Copper Catla catla Catla Catlocarpio siamensis Cirrhinus cirrhosus Mrigal Ctenopharyngodon idella Grass carp Cyprinus carpio ‘European’ carp Labeo calabasu and L. rohita Orange fin labeo, rohu. Zacco platypus Freshwater minnow Hypophthalmichthys molitrix Silver carp Tor spp (17) River carp, Deccan, high backed, jungha, putitor, Thai mahseer Notropis spp Shiners Phoxinus erythrogaster Southern redbelly dace

Doradidae Oxydoras spp (4) Ripsaw catfish, black doras, black shielded catfish

Elassomatidae Elassoma spp Pygmy sunfish

Eleotridae Oxyeleotris marmorata Marble goby

Erythrinidae Erythrinus spp Trahiras Hoplerythrinus spp Hoplias spp

Esocidae Esox spp Pikes

Gasterosteidae Pungitius pungitius Ninespine stickleback Apeltes quadracus Four spined stickleback Culaea inconstans

Gobiidae Acanthogobius flavimanus Yellow fin goby Tridentiger trigonocephalus Chameleon goby, striped goby

Gymnarchidae Gymnarchus niloticus Aba aba

Gymnotidae Electrophorus electricus Electric

Hepsetidae Hepsetus odoe African pike

Heteropneustidae Heteropneustes fossilis Stinging catfish

Lepisosteidae Atractosteus (3 spp) American, armoured or Lepisiosteus (4 spp) alligator

Malapteruridae Malapterurus spp Electric catfish

Mormyridae Mormyrops anguilloides Bottlenose, Cornish jack

Poeciliidae Belonesox belizanus Pike minnow, pike killifish Gambusia spp Mosquito fish

28 A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA FAMILY SPECIFIC NAME COMMON NAME

Polyodontidae Polyodon spathula Mississippi Psephurus gladius Chinese

Protopteridae annectens African

Schilbeidae Schilbe mystus African butter catfish

Siluridae Silurus spp European catfish,

Trichomycteridae Paravandelia oxyptera Parasitic catfish

Valenciidae Valencia hispanica Valencia toothcarp

Cambaridae Procambarus clarkii Red swamp crayfish

GREY LIST (species requiring further scientific/technical consideration and risk assessment)

NOTE This list is by no means exhaustive and should not be taken as definitive as other species will be added. A technical working group will be adding to the list as it assesses and reviews the species currently in Australia.

FAMILY SPECIFIC NAME COMMON NAME

Acipenseridae Acipenser spp Sturgeons

Anabantidae—entire family Ctenopoma (21 spp) Ctenopoma ansorgi Ctenopoma argentoventer Ctenopoma nanum

Anabas (2 spp) Microctenopoma (11 spp) Microctenopoma ansorgii

Chacidae Chaca spp Angler catfishes, frogmouth catfishes

Characidae Astynax spp Astyanacinus spp Bryconops spp Bryconops affinis Bryconops melanurus Ctenobrycon spp Hollandichthys multifasciatus Knodus savannensis

Cichlidae Amphilophus citrinellus Midas cichlid, false red devil cichlid, citrinellum Amphilophus zaliosus Amphilophus labiatus Red devil Bucketmouth Caquetaia umbrifera Cichla spp Peacock cichlid, tucanare urophthalmus Mexican mojarra Crenicichla spp

A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA 29 FAMILY SPECIFIC NAME COMMON NAME

Cichlidae (continued) Crenicichla lacustrus Crenicichla lepidota Crenicichla notophthalmus Crenicichla saxatilis Herichthys cyanoguttatum Rio Grande cichlid dovii Guapote, wolf cichlid Guapote tigre, jaguar cichlid False yellow jacket cichlid Petenia splendida Bay snook

Ctenoluciidae Ctenolucius spp Ctenolucius hujeta Boulengerella spp characin, hujeta

Cyprinidae Tinca tinca Tench Rutilus rutilus Roach Cyprinus carpio Domesticated koi carp

Dasyatidae Himantura spp Freshwater

Eleotridae Eleotris spp Batanga lebretonis Sleepers

Fundulidae Fundulus spp Fundulus chrysotus Leptolucania spp Leptolucania ommata Adinia spp Adinia xenica Lucania spp Topminnow

Ictaluridae—entire family Ameirus (7 spp) Bullheads, madtoms except Prietella, Satan and Ictalurus (9 spp) Trogoglanis,which are Ictalurus punctatus harmless and IUCN listed Pylodictis (1 spp) Noturus (26 spp)

Lebiasinidae Lebiasina spp Lebiasina bimaculata Twospot lebiasina

Lepidosirenidae Lepidosiren paradoxa South American lungfish

Lepiosteidae Lepisosteus (4 spp) alligator gars

Mastacembelidae—subfamilies Mastacembelus spp

Mastacembelinae and Caecomastacembelus spp Spiny eel, tyre-track eel, zig Afromastacembelinae except Aethiomastacembelus spp Macrognathus spp zag eel

Notopteridae Chitala spp Featherbacks or knifefish

Osteoglossidae gigas Arapaima, giant arapaima, pirarucu Osteoglossum spp Osteoglossum bicirrhosum Arawana Scleropages formosus Golden

30 A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA FAMILY SPECIFIC NAME COMMON NAME

Pangasiidae—entire family Pangasius (22 spp) Pangasius gigas , catfishes, blue shark Helicophagus (3 spp)

Percidae Perca fluviatilis European perch

Pimelodidae Leiarius spp Sailfin antenna, saddle or painted catfish Perrunichthys perruno Leopard catfish Phractocephalus hemioliopterus Red tail catfish Pseudoplatystoma fasciatum Barred sorubim (tiger catfish) Sorubim (5 spp) Duckbill catfish, shovelnose catfish Sorubim lima Sorubimichthys spp Brachyplatysoma spp

Poeciliidae Alfaro (2 spp) Amazon or knifetail Alfaro amazonus livebearer Alfaro huberi Heterandria spp Heterandria bimaculata Two-spot livebearer Tomeurus gracilis

Polypteridae Polypterus spp Birchirs or ropefish Polypterus enlicheri Polypterus retropinnis Erpetoichthys spp Erpetoichthys calabaricus

Potamotrygonidae Potamotrygon (18 spp) River stingrays Paratrygon (1 spp) Plesiotrygon (1 spp)

Protopteridae Protopterus (7 spp) (excluding African lungfish) Pannectdens

Rivulidae Leptolebias spp Leptolebias aureoguttatus Leptolebias marmoratus Leptolebias minimus Leptolebias opalescens Leptolebias opalescens

Schilbeidae Schilbe spp African butter catfish

Siluridae Ompok spp Butter catfish Sandelia (2 spp) ctenopomas

Tetraodontidae Chelenodon spp (except C. patoca) Freshwater Colomesus spp pufferfish Chonerhinos (5 spp) Carinotetraodon (6 spp) Takifugu (~21 spp) Auriglobus (1 sp) Tetraodon (~22 spp)

A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA 31 APPENDIX 3 NOXIOUS AQUATIC PLANTS (DECLARED AQUATIC PLANTS OF AUSTRALIA)

NAME MUST NOT MUST BE BE SOLD CONTROLLED OR ERADICATED

Alligator Weed (Alternanthera philoxeroides) All states and territories All states and territories

Anchored water hyacinth (Eichhornia azurea) NSW, Q NSW, Q

Arrowhead (Sagittaria graminea subsp. platyphylla) NSW, WA WA, Parts of NSW

Arrowhead (Sagittaria montevidenis) NSW, SA, Tas, WA SA, Tas, WA

Cabomba (Cabomba caroliniana) All ACT, NT, Q, SA, TAS, WA

Canadian Pond Weed (Elodea canadensis) NT, SA, Tas, WA SA, Tas, WA

Eurasian Water milfoil (Myrophyllum spicatum) NSW, Q, SA, NSW, Q, SA

Hornwort (Ceratophyllum demersum)TasTas

Horsetails (Equisetum spp) All states and territories All states and territories

Hydrilla (Hydrilla verticillata)TasTas

Hydrocotyl (Hydrocotyle ranunculoides) SA, WA SA, WA

Hygrophila (Hygrophila costata) NSW, Q NSW, Q

Hygrophila (Hygrophila polysperma) NSW NSW

Hymenachne (Hymenachne amplexicaulis) All states and territories Q, NSW

Lagarosiphon (Lagarosiphon major) NSW, NT, Q, SA, Tas, Vic, WA NSW, NT, Q, SA, Tas, Vic, WA

Leafy Elodea (Egeria densa) NT, SA, Tas, WA SA, Tas, WA

Limnocharis (Limnocharis flava) NSW, Q NSW, Q

32 A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA NAME MUST NOT MUST BE BE SOLD CONTROLLED OR ERADICATED

Mimosa pigra (Mimosa pigra) All states and territories NT, Q

Parrot’s feather (Myriophyllum aquaticum) ACT, Tas, WA ACT, Tas, WA

Peruvian primrose (Ludwigia peruviana) Q, SA, NSW Q, SA

Pond Apple (Annona glabra) All states and territories NSW, Q

Salvinia (Salvinia molesta) All states and territories All states and territories

Salvinias (Salvinia spp not molesta)Q Q

Senegal tea (Gymnocoronis spilanthoides) NSW, NT, Q, SA, Tas, WA NSW, Q, SA, Tas, WA

Shield pennywort (Hydrocotyle verticillate)WA WA

Water Caltrope (Trapa spp) NSW, QLD, SA (T. natans), Tas NSW, QLD, SA (T. natans), Tas

Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) All states and territories All states and territories

Water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes) ACT, NSW, NT, Q, WA ACT, NSW, NT, Q, WA

Water soldiers (Stratiotes aloides) NSW, Q, SA, NSW, Q, SA

Willow (Salix spp other than babylonica) All states and territories, ACT, Q, SA (excluding calodendron and reichardtii) (excluding S. calodendron, S. calodendron, and and S. reichardii in SA) S. reichardii), Tas

Disclaimer Declarations are correct as of May 2006. This allowed entry in your state/territory. Weed legislation is list may not contain all aquatic and semi aquatic plants regularly updated and other plant species may be banned from sale in your state/territory. Also, aquatic prohibited from sale, so check with local or state weed plants banned from sale may also be prohibited or not control authority for the most up-to-date list.

A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA 33 APPENDIX 4 CURRENT REGULATION OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA

JURISDICTION CURRENT LICENSING BASIS FOR CRITERIA FOR ARE CRITERIA ARRANGEMENTS LICENSING LICENSING CURRENTLY BEING ARRANGEMENTS ARRANGEMENTS REVIEWED?

Victoria In theory, anyone breeding or Licensing arrangements Sections 42 and 43 of Currently reviewing what selling ornamental fish are targeted towards the Act provide the appropriate licensing requires a licence or permit larger aquaculture criteria. In effect, it arrangement there should under the Fisheries Act 1995. ventures, where fish are states that you need be for the ornamental fish However, currently we only produced for human authorisation under the sector license large breeders consumption Act if you hatch, breed, display or grow fish for sale or other commercial purpose or use or create habitat to do the above

South Australia South Australia has a Current licensing Currently in South All management and legislative basis, through the arrangements for fish Australia and according licensing arrangements Aquaculture Act 2001, for keepers are targeted to legislation, if you are under review. South aquatic organisms kept for towards marine and breed any fish you need Australia will await the the purposes of business or landbased aquaculture to be licensed, and if recommendations of the trade. Some producers of ventures of varying you want to keep fish Ornamental Fish Policy aquarium species are already scales. A permit system on the ‘permitted’ lists Group before reviewing licensed under the is proposed in the review you need a permit. In licensing arrangements Aquaculture Act, and powers of the Fisheries Act, practice, if you breed thoroughly exist within this legislation to which is likely to be ornamental fish, you move towards broader changed in 2006 most likely have not to licensing of ornamental fish date been required by breeders under the Act. Upon PIRSA Aquaculture to application, permits are issued comply with the under the Fisheries Act 1982 licensing system, and for the keeping of particular most likely won’t have listed ‘permitted’ ornamental a licence. This will be fish species. There is currently addressed once the no impetus to enforce the ornamental fish review permit system due to various progresses to ensure flaws and difficulties a complementary approach with other states/territories

34 A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA JURISDICTION CURRENT LICENSING BASIS FOR CRITERIA FOR ARE CRITERIA ARRANGEMENTS LICENSING LICENSING CURRENTLY BEING ARRANGEMENTS ARRANGEMENTS REVIEWED?

Queensland In theory, anyone breeding or Licensing arrangements Act applies to all forms Yes selling ornamental fish are targeted towards of aquaculture Development authority requires a licence or permit larger aquaculture required for anyone who under the Fisheries Act 1995. ventures, where fish are wants to conduct However, currently we only produced for human aquaculture (grow and sell license large breeders consumption fish). For smaller, low-risk developments, a self- assessment code has been drafted and is being tested • No registration is required for developments >5000 L capacity. • Registration only required for developments with – pond area not exceeding 5 hectares – gross floor area not exceeding 50 square metres • note: there are some restrictions to the above. Larger developments, and those not considered low risk, require approval and permits

Western Australia Do not license the retail N/A N/A No. sector. Prohibit import of Department may support noxious fish. Require changes if there are operators to apply for demonstrable benefits from approval to translocate licensing in terms of aquaculture fish species protection of environmental and fisheries values. National Competition Policy would have to be addressed, as well as resource issues. In short, it won’t be done unless there were clear cost/benefits not achievable in cheaper ways

A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA 35 JURISDICTION CURRENT LICENSING BASIS FOR CRITERIA FOR ARE CRITERIA ARRANGEMENTS LICENSING LICENSING CURRENTLY BEING ARRANGEMENTS ARRANGEMENTS REVIEWED?

Northern Territory Import of live fish through Knowledge of who is Any individual/ No permit system. importing and trading. company trading in ornamental fish All aquarium sales reported Knowledge of what is meeting criteria through licensing. being imported and described in the traded. Licensing of ornamental fish Northern Territory species production under Knowledge of origin Fisheries Act aquaculture permit where the ‘fish’ are Regulations182 sourced. and 199 Control of species imported for EPBC Act and noxious list considerations. Control for translocation issues with respect to disease issues

Australian Capital No licence required for sale Live fish imported/ Section 22 Fisheries No Territory of fish. exported from the ACT Act 2000. The must be subject of import/export of live Import licence required for licence. This is to enable fish to/from the ACT. live fish. Suitable live fish the possibility of trace Section 28 provides restricted by declaration Pet forward/back in the the ‘relevant trade is licensed and must event of an animal considerations’ report stock holdings and disease outbreak numbers of live imports or exports

New South Wales Pet shops are not regulated by Targeting of breeders Permit holders are No NSW Department of Primary rather than retail outlets required to abide by Industries In theory, any the same protocols as person producing fish for the other aquaculturalists aquarium trade requires a permit under NSW Fisheries Management Act 1994. Presently, there are seven aquaculture permit holders producing aquarium fish

36 A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA JURISDICTION CURRENT LICENSING BASIS FOR CRITERIA FOR ARE CRITERIA ARRANGEMENTS LICENSING LICENSING CURRENTLY BEING ARRANGEMENTS ARRANGEMENTS REVIEWED?

Tasmania The only persons permitted Applications are All those who wish to No to sell freshwater fish are assessed, and import, breed and/or those persons holding: licences/registrations sell freshwater fish granted with conditions • a commercial freshwater to ensure (as far as is fishing licence practical) that the site • a fish farm licence and system are adequate • a fish dealers registration, and suitable, and that the and operation does not pose • an exemption permit. an unacceptable risk in The ‘fish farm licence’ and the relation to disease and ‘fish dealers registration’ are pest potential which both relevant to the could adversely impact freshwater aquarium fish on cultured and native trade. Fish cannot be fish populations and imported, bred or sold their ecosystems. without a licence or The process itself is an registration appropriately educative device endorsed. Conditions cover requiring applicants to the activities permitted and think about and be the species allowed. aware of the potential Applicants are required to risks posed by their provide comprehensive business, but this is not information about their the main focus of the intended business, covering licensing/registration applicant details, site details, system. system design, species, culture In the event that techniques and marketing something does go awry, the licensing/registration system gives us a greater capacity to trace forward and back, and implement controls quickly and efficiently. Fees are charged for licences/ registration, but this is to offset the costs, not as a revenue raising exercise

A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA 37 APPENDIX 5 PIAA MEMBER’S CODE OF ETHICS

MEMBER’S CODE OF ETHICS

1 Members shall ensure that all animals under their 7 Members shall, wherever possible, accurately care shall be provided with humane treatment and describe the needs and care of any animal sold with correct and proper housing in accordance and provide or promote any literature relevant to with applicable state and federal regulations. the well-being of the animal after purchase. 2 Members shall take any necessary action to 8 Members shall not offer for sale any item or discourage any acts of cruelty or mistreatment to product that does not knowingly conform to animals under their care and to protect those applicable state or federal regulations or that may animals from undue stress or discomfort. endanger the safety of the user or animal. 3 Members shall not offer for sale any animal that is 9 Members shall endeavour to maintain their known to be suffering from disease, illness or business premises in a clean and safe condition injury and shall seek prompt, proper veterinary and provide any necessary ventilation or lighting attention for any animal in their care that is so that may be required for the comfort of livestock, affected. employees and customers alike. 4 Members shall ensure that any animal in their 10 Members will trade in accordance with applicable care is provided with an adequate and proper diet, state and federal regulations and, by example, in accordance with the needs of the species. shall strive to promote the Australian pet industry 5 Members shall not offer for sale any animal that is and the benefits of responsible animal ownership classified as protected fauna other than those to potential customers and members of the species allowed under state and federal Acts, for general public. which the necessary certificates must be provided. 6 Members shall ensure that employees in charge of livestock shall be familiar with the care and needs Pet Industry Association of Australia of such species or shall be under the supervision PO Box 7108 of a person who is knowledgeable and competent Baulkham Hills Business Centre in this regard. NSW 2153 Telephone (02) 9659 5811 Fax (02) 9659 5822 Email [email protected]

38 A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA APPENDIX 6 REGIONAL CONTACTS

STATE/TERRITORY CONTACT PERSON TELEPHONE, FAX & EMAIL

Australian Capital Territory ACT - Parks, Conservation & Lands Telephone 13 22 81 Fisheries

New South Wales Aquatic Pest Unit Telephone (02) 4982 1232 Department of Primary Industries Fax (02) 4982 1107 Email [email protected]

Northern Territory Aquatic Pest Management Telephone (08) 8999 2126 Email [email protected]

Queensland Fishwatch Hotline Telephone 1800 017 116 DPI&F Business Information Center Telephone 13 25 23

South Australia FISHWATCH Telephone 1 800 065 522 or PIRSA Fisheries Telephone (08) 8226 2316

Tasmania Inland Fisheries Service Telephone 1300 INFISH BUSHWATCH Telephone 1800 005 555

Victoria DPI Customer Service Centre Telephone 136 186

Western Australia FISHWATCH Telephone 1800 815 507 Biosecurity Officer Telephone (08) 9482 7385

A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA 39 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

AFMF ...... Australian Fisheries Managers Forum

BA ...... Biosecurity Australia

CITES ...... Convention on the International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora

DEW ...... Department of the Environment and Water Resources

EPBC Act ...... Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999

GMO ...... genetically modified organism

IUCN ...... International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

OFPWG ...... Ornamental Fish Policy Working Group

OGTR ...... Office of the Gene Technology Regulator

PIAA ...... Pet Industry Association of Australia

QAP ...... quarantine approved premises

Weeds CRC ...... Cooperative Research Centre for Australian Weed Management

40 A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA

A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA