“Icf” “Plan De Manejo Del Pa

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

“Icf” “Plan De Manejo Del Pa INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE CONSERVACIÓN Y DESARROLLO FORESTAL, ÁREAS PROTEGIDAS Y VIDA SILVESTRE “ICF” DEPARTAMENTO DE ÁREAS PROTEGIDAS “DAP” OFICINA REGIONAL FORESTAL NOROCCIDENTE OFICINA REGIONAL FORESTAL DE ATLÁNTIDA “PLAN DE MANEJO DEL PARQUE NACIONAL BLANCA JEANNETTE KAWAS FERNANDEZ” 2012 - 2016 CO - MANEJANTES Municipalidad de Tela Municipalidad de Puerto Cortés COOPERANTE TELA, HONDURAS JUNIO, 2012 PLAN DE MANEJO DEL PARQUE NACIONAL BLANCA JEANNETTE KAWAS FERNÁNDEZ El presente documento se elaboró durante el período de septiembre a diciembre del año 2011 y enero a mayo del año 2012, a solicitud de La Fundación para la Protección de Lancetilla, Punta Sal y Texiguat (PROLANSATE), con el apoyo financiero del El Proyecto de Gestión Sostenible de los Recursos Naturales y Cuencas del Corredor Biológico Mesoamericano en el Atlántico Hondureño (PROCORREDOR). El documento muestra los resultados de la actualización del Plan de Manejo del Parque Nacional Blanca Jeannette Kawas Fernández (PNJK), el cual incluye aspectos biofísicos, socioeconómicos, legales, una propuesta de zonificación y los programas de manejo. República de Honduras, 2012 Coordinación técnica y responsable directo Ph.D. Enrique Alvarado Irías (in fíeri) (Especialista en socioeconómica ambiental) Equipo Técnico M.Sc Jorge Alfredo Cárcamo (Especialista en SIG y gestión integral de microcuencas) Ing. Ana Patricia Martínez (Especialista en áreas protegidas y biodiversidad) Lic. Aarón Mendoza (Especialista en monitoreo de especies) Supervisión Técnica Ing. Dennis Sierra (Director de PROLANSATE) Ing. Fanny Fuentes (Técnico de PROLANSATE) Ing. Rómulo Gutiérrez (Representante del ICF/Tela) Lic. Miguel Ángel Ordoñez (Representante de la UMA/Tela) Ing. Carlos Madrid (Representante de la DEMA/Puerto Cortés) Edición técnica y de estilo Ph.D. Enrique Alvarado Irías (in fíeri) 2 PLAN DE MANEJO DEL PARQUE NACIONAL BLANCA JEANNETTE KAWAS FERNÁNDEZ ÍNDICE GENERAL 1. INTRODUCCIÓN ........................................................................................................... 8 2. DESCRIPCIÓN DEL ÁREA ......................................................................................... 11 2.1 Categoría, ubicación y límites .................................................................................... 11 2.1.1 Categoría de manejo............................................................................................... 11 2.1.2 Ubicación y límites del área protegida ..................................................................... 14 2.2 Caracterización biofísica ............................................................................................ 21 2.2.1 Características biológicas ....................................................................................... 23 2.2.1.1 Comunidades y especies de flora ........................................................................ 23 2.2.1.2 Comunidades y especies de fauna ...................................................................... 27 2.2.1.2.1 Fauna del parque con algún estatus de amenaza ............................................. 41 2.2.2. Ecosistemas........................................................................................................... 42 2.2.2.1. Clasificación de Zonas de Vida según Holdridge................................................. 42 2.2.2.2 Ecosistemas vegetales según la clasificación de UNESCO ................................. 49 2.2.2.3. Áreas alteradas ................................................................................................... 51 2.2.2.3.1 El cultivo de Palma Africana en el PNJK ........................................................... 53 2.2.2.4. Dinámica de los ecosistemas y las poblaciones .................................................. 56 2.2.2.4.1 Bienes y servicios ambientales ......................................................................... 61 2.2.3. Características Físicas ........................................................................................... 72 2.2.3.1. Geomorfología .................................................................................................... 72 2.2.3.2. Suelos ................................................................................................................. 72 2.2.3.3. Pendientes .......................................................................................................... 75 2.2.3.4. Hidrología............................................................................................................ 77 2.2.3.5. Altitud .................................................................................................................. 79 2.2.3.6. Precipitación ....................................................................................................... 79 3 PLAN DE MANEJO DEL PARQUE NACIONAL BLANCA JEANNETTE KAWAS FERNÁNDEZ 2.2.3.7. Clima................................................................................................................... 79 2.2.4. Problemática .......................................................................................................... 82 2.2.4.1. Factores naturales .............................................................................................. 82 2.2.4.2. Factores antropogénicos ..................................................................................... 82 2.3 Caracterización socioeconómica ................................................................................ 89 2.3.1 Población ................................................................................................................ 89 2.3.1.1 Demografía .......................................................................................................... 93 2.3.1.2 Organización ........................................................................................................ 96 2.3.2 Salud .................................................................................................................... 101 2.3.3 Educación ............................................................................................................. 105 2.3.4 Actividades económicas ........................................................................................ 108 2.3.5 Relación de las comunidades con los recursos naturales (RRNN) ........................ 111 2.3.5.1 Conocimiento del área protegida ........................................................................ 111 2.3.5.2 Protección ......................................................................................................... 112 2.3.5.3 Uso de los recursos naturales por las comunidades ......................................... 112 2.3.6 Evaluación de los Servicios ................................................................................... 113 2.3.6.1 Vivienda ............................................................................................................ 113 2.3.6.2 Saneamiento básico ........................................................................................... 115 2.3.6.3 Agua potable ...................................................................................................... 116 2.3.6.4 Vías de comunicación - Infraestructura vial ....................................................... 118 2.3.7 Evaluación y análisis de la tenencia de la tierra .................................................... 120 2.3.8 Análisis de la problemática identificada por las comunidades ............................... 122 2.4 Caracterización legal e institucional ......................................................................... 125 2.4.1 Contexto internacional de los esfuerzos de desarrollo sostenible en el AP ........... 125 2.4.2 Políticas y estrategias de desarrollo sostenible vigentes en el país ....................... 126 4 PLAN DE MANEJO DEL PARQUE NACIONAL BLANCA JEANNETTE KAWAS FERNÁNDEZ 2.4.3 Marco legal y administrativo vigente ..................................................................... 127 3. VISIÓN, MISIÓN Y OBJETIVOS ............................................................................... 131 3.1 Visión ....................................................................................................................... 131 3.2 Misión ...................................................................................................................... 131 3.3 Objetivos .................................................................................................................. 132 3.3.1 Objetivo general .................................................................................................... 132 3.3.2 Objetivos específicos ............................................................................................ 132 4. ZONIFICACIÓN Y NORMATIVA DE USO ................................................................. 133 4.1 Antecedentes ........................................................................................................... 133 4.2 Zonificacion propuesta ............................................................................................. 134 4.3 Descripcion de las zonas y subzonas del parque ..................................................... 137 4.3.1 Zona Núcleo.......................................................................................................... 137 4.3.1.1 Subzona de preservación absoluta .................................................................... 137 4.3.1.2 Subzona
Recommended publications
  • CAT Vertebradosgt CDC CECON USAC 2019
    Catálogo de Autoridades Taxonómicas de vertebrados de Guatemala CDC-CECON-USAC 2019 Centro de Datos para la Conservación (CDC) Centro de Estudios Conservacionistas (Cecon) Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacia Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala Este documento fue elaborado por el Centro de Datos para la Conservación (CDC) del Centro de Estudios Conservacionistas (Cecon) de la Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacia de la Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala. Guatemala, 2019 Textos y edición: Manolo J. García. Zoólogo CDC Primera edición, 2019 Centro de Estudios Conservacionistas (Cecon) de la Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacia de la Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala ISBN: 978-9929-570-19-1 Cita sugerida: Centro de Estudios Conservacionistas [Cecon]. (2019). Catálogo de autoridades taxonómicas de vertebrados de Guatemala (Documento técnico). Guatemala: Centro de Datos para la Conservación [CDC], Centro de Estudios Conservacionistas [Cecon], Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacia, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala [Usac]. Índice 1. Presentación ............................................................................................ 4 2. Directrices generales para uso del CAT .............................................. 5 2.1 El grupo objetivo ..................................................................... 5 2.2 Categorías taxonómicas ......................................................... 5 2.3 Nombre de autoridades .......................................................... 5 2.4 Estatus taxonómico
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics and Historical Biogeography of Greater Antillean Cichlidae
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 39 (2006) 619–627 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Systematics and historical biogeography of Greater Antillean Cichlidae Prosanta Chakrabarty ¤ University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Fish Division, 1109 Geddes Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1079, USA Received 15 July 2005; revised 8 January 2006; accepted 11 January 2006 Available online 21 February 2006 Abstract A molecular phylogenetic analysis recovers a pattern consistent with a drift vicariance scenario for the origin of Greater Antillean cichlids. This phylogeny, based on mitochondrial and nuclear genes, reveals that clades on diVerent geographic regions diverged concur- rently with the geological separation of these areas. Middle America was initially colonized by South American cichlids in the Cretaceous, most probably through the Cretaceous Island Arc. The separation of Greater Antillean cichlids and their mainland Middle American rel- atives was caused by a drift vicariance event that took place when the islands became separated from Yucatan in the Eocene. Greater Antillean cichlids are monophyletic and do not have close South American relatives. Therefore, the alternative hypothesis that these cich- lids migrated via an Oligocene landbridge from South America is falsiWed. A marine dispersal hypothesis is not employed because the drift vicariance hypothesis is better able to explain the biogeographic patterns, both temporal and phylogenetic. © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: Cichlidae; Caribbean geology; Greater Antilles biogeography; Molecular systematics “The geology is in many respects uncertain, the phyletic 1999). The other category suggests Middle American ori- analysis inadequate and the fossil record wretched. We gins from a period of coalescence between these islands and have if not the worst case scenario deWnitely a very bad Yucatan in the early Cenozoic (Pitman et al., 1993; Pindell, one.” 1994; updated from Malfait and Dinkelman, 1972; Ted- ford, 1974).
    [Show full text]
  • Lista De Especies Que Habitan En Las Aguas Continentales De
    LISTA DE ESPECIES QUE HABITAN LAS AGUAS CONTINENTALES DE CENTROAMERCIA (Fuente: Inventario PREPAC) PECES FAMILIA GENERO ESPECIE NOMBRE COMUN Lepisosteidae Atractosteus Atractosteus tropicus Gaspar, machorra Pristis microdon Pez sierra Pristis pectinatus Pez sierra Pristidae Pristis Pristis perotteti Pez sierra Pristis pristis Pez sierra Carcharhinidae Carcharhinus Carcharhinus leucas Tiburón Syngathidae Pseudophallus mindii Pez pipa Gymnotus carapo Anguila Gymnotidae Gymnotus Gymnotus cylindricus Anguila Ophisternon Ophisternon aenigmaticum Anguila de pantano Symbranchidae Sinbranchus Synbranchus marmoratus Anguila Anguillidae Anguila Anguila rostrata Anguila del Atlántico Astyanax aeneus Billum Central tetra Astyanax fasciatus Sardina Astyanx Astyanax nasutus Sardina Astyanax ruberrimus Sardina Brycon guatemalensis Machaca Brycon Brycon petrosus Sábalo Brycon striatulus Sábalo Bryconamericanus Bryconamericus emperador Sardina de río Bryconamericus ricae Sabalete Carlana Carlana eigenmanni Sardinita Characidae Compsura Compsura gorgonae Sardina de río Gephyrocharax Gephyrocharax atricaudatus Mojarra, Vieja Hyphessobrycon compressus Billun Mayan tetra Hyphessobrycon Hyphessobrycon panamensis Sardinita Hyphessobrycon tortuguerae Sardina Pseudocheirodon affinis Sardina Pseudocheirodon Pseudocheirodon arnoldi sardinita Roeboides bouchellei Sardina Roeboides guatemalensis Sardinita, choveta Roeboides Roeboides occidentalis Sardina, choveta Roeboides salvadoris Sardina Hoplias malabaricus Pejeperro Erythrinidae Hoplias Hoplias microlepis Pejeperro
    [Show full text]
  • ANNEXES George Price Highway from Miles 47.9 - 79.4 Final Report on the Environmental and Social Impact Study
    Environmental and Social Impact Assessments for the Rehabilitation of theANNEXES George Price Highway from Miles 47.9 - 79.4 Final Report on the Environmental and Social Impact Study Ministry of Works and Transport Belmopan, July 27, 2014 Environmental and Social Impact Assessments for the Rehabilitation of the George Price Highway From Miles 47.9 - 79.4 ANNEXES Final Report on the Environmental and Social Impact Study Contacts: Ismael Fabro M.Sc., Managing Director and Environmental Specialist – Team Leader Ramon Frutos M.Sc., Disaster Risk Management Specialist John Flowers M.A, Social Specialist Belize Environmental Technologies Ltd 2216 Juliet Soberanis Street Belama Phase I, Belize City Tel: 501-223-1819 Cell: 610-1947 Cover Design and Photographs : Juan R. Rancharan (T-B) Roaring Creek Bridge, Z-Curve leading to Cayo, and Monitoring noise at Belmopan – Roaring Creek junction. ANNEXES Contents Annex Ia: The Terms of Reference – DOE ................................................................................................. 1 Annex Ib: The Terms of Reference - IADB ................................................................................................. 8 Annex II: List of Contributors to the Preparation of the ESIA ................................................................ 27 Annex IIIa: Breakdown of Culverts by Road Section and Size ............................................................... 28 Annex IIIb: Inventory of Culverts (Anthony Thurton and Associates) ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Caroline Ferreira Calvario
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL RURAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO INSTITUTO DE CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS E DA SAÚDE CURSO DE GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS FAUNA DE PARASITOS METAZOÁRIOS DE BRYCON ORTHOTAENIA GÜNTHER, 1864 (ACTINOPTERYGII, BRYCONIDAE) DO ALTO RIO SÃO FRANCISCO, MINAS GERAIS, BRASIL Elaborado por CAROLINE FERREIRA CALVARIO Orientador MARILIA DE CARVALHO BRASIL SATO SEROPÉDICA RIO DE JANEIRO, 2018 CAROLINE FERREIRA CALVARIO FAUNA DE PARASITOS METAZOÁRIOS DE BRYCON ORTHOTAENIA GÜNTHER, 1864 (ACTINOPTERYGII, BRYCONIDAE) DO ALTO RIO SÃO FRANCISCO, MINAS GERAIS, BRASIL Monografia apresentada como requisito parcial para obtenção do título de Bacharel em Ciências Biológicas JULHO, 2018 AGRADECIMENTOS Quero agradecer... A Deus por ter me guiado e sustentado até aqui, que nos momentos de dificuldades foi a minha fé e esperança. Aos meus pais que me criaram com todo amor e carinho, sempre dando o melhor que eles tinham a oferecer. Quero agradecer ao meu pai Joaquim Nogueira Calvario, que já partiu para o céu, mas que foi a minha base nesta vida, juntamente com a minha mãe, Sônia Regina Ferreira Calvario. Ele sempre foi meu amigo fiel e meu apoio aqui na Terra. Partiu cedo e repentinamente, mas permanecerá em meu coração uma eterna gratidão. Minha mãezinha que é uma guerreira forte e que sempre me deu os mais sábios conselhos e que topa entrar em todas as batalhas comigo. Sem você, eu não teria chegado até aqui! Aos meus irmãos Raquel Ferreira Calvario e Filipe Ferreira Calvario, que foram os primeiros amigos da minha vida, cada um com seu jeitinho especial. Ele me ajudando com matemática e inglês, e ela dando aqueles conselhos de irmã mais velha, minha grande parceira da vida.
    [Show full text]
  • A Strategic Approach to the Management of Ornamental Fish in Australia Communication Strategy and Grey List Review - a REPORT to OFMIG
    A strAtegic ApproAch to the management of ornamental fish in australia communicAtion strAtegy And grey list review - A report TO oFmig A strategic approach to the management of ornamental fish in Australia Communication strategy and grey list review – a report to OFMIG Andy Moore, Nicholas Marton and Alex McNee March 2010 © Commonwealth of Australia 2010 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Attorney General’s Department, Robert Garran Offices, National Circuit, Barton ACT 2600 or posted at http://www.ag.gov.au/cca. The Australian Government acting through the Bureau of Rural Sciences has exercised due care and skill in the preparation and compilation of the information and data set out in this publication. Notwithstanding, the Bureau of Rural Sciences, its employees and advisers disclaim all liability, including liability for negligence, for any loss, damage, injury, expense or cost incurred by any person as a result of accessing, using or relying upon any of the information or data set out in this publication to the maximum extent permitted by law. Postal address: Bureau of Rural Sciences GPO Box 858 Canberra, ACT 2601 Copies available from: www.brs.gov.au ISBN: 1-921192-37-2 ii Acknowledgements This report was made possible through financial support from the Ornamental Fish Management Implementation Group (OFMIG) which is funded by state, teritory and federal government agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Body Size Evolution and Diversity of Fishes Using the Neotropical Cichlids (Cichlinae) As a Model System
    Body Size Evolution and Diversity of Fishes using the Neotropical Cichlids (Cichlinae) as a Model System by Sarah Elizabeth Steele A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto © Copyright by Sarah Elizabeth Steele 2018 Body Size Evolution and Diversity of Fishes using the Neotropical Cichlids (Cichlinae) as a Model System Sarah Elizabeth Steele Doctor of Philosophy Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto 2018 Abstract The influence of body size on an organism’s physiology, morphology, ecology, and life history has been considered one of the most fundamental relationships in ecology and evolution. The ray-finned fishes are a highly diverse group of vertebrates. Yet, our understanding of diversification in this group is incomplete, and the role of body size in creating this diversity is largely unknown. I examined body size in Neotropical cichlids (Cichlinae) to elucidate the large- and small-scale factors affecting body size diversity and distribution, and how body size shapes species, morphological, and ecological diversity in fishes. Characterization of body size distributions across the phylogeny of Neotropical cichlids revealed considerable overlap in body size, particularly in intermediate-sized fishes, with few, species-poor lineages exhibiting extreme body size. Three potential peaks of adaptive evolution in body size were identified within Cichlinae. I found freshwater fishes globally tend to be smaller and their distributions more diverse and right-skewed than marine counterparts, irrespective of taxonomy and clade age, with a strengthening of these trends in riverine systems. Comparisons of Neotropical cichlid body size diversity and distribution to this broader context shows that body size patterns are largely abnormal compared to most freshwater fishes, particularly those of the Neotropics.
    [Show full text]
  • Not So Fast a New Take on the Great American Biotic Interchange
    EIGHTEEN Not So Fast A New Take on the Great American Biotic Interchange PROSANTA CHAKRABARTY and JAMES S. ALBERT The completion of the Middle American land bridge resulted in some limited interchange of freshwater fishes. Again, the predominant direction of dispersal was from south to north. LOMOLINO ET AL. 2006, 379 14 The prevailing biological view of the closure of the Isthmus into two historical assemblages: members of an “Old South- of Panama is of a dominant South American fauna rapidly ern Element” (a Paleoichthyofauna) of Cretaceous or Paleo- expanding northward via the newly formed land bridge cene origins (including Hyphessobrycon, Gymnotus, Rhamdia, between the continents (Stehli and Webb 1985; Bermingham ‘Cichlasoma,’ Phallichthys, Alfaro, Rivulus) and a Neoichthyo- 15 and Martin 1998; Lomolino et al. 2006). The current diversity fauna of Plio-Pleistocene origins (including Astyanax, Brycon, of Central American and tropical North American (together Roeboides, Hypostomus, Trichomycterus, Brachyhypopomus, Apter- Middle American) freshwater fish lineages is largely explained onotus, Aequidens, Geophagus, Synbranchus). Under this view, to be the result of explosive radiations that were facilitated the current diversity of Central American fishes is the result by the invasion of South American fishes into new and unoc- of multiple temporally distinct waves of South American inva- cupied habitats on and across the isthmus. To the contrary, sions. Members of the Paleoichthyofauna may be regarded as we present data that suggest that the Isthmus acted as a “two- the ecosystem incumbents (sensu Vermeij and Dudley 2000), way street,” with an asymmetry favoring a dominant Central which were resistant to being displaced by potential invaders American freshwater fish fauna moving south.
    [Show full text]
  • “Estado Del Conocimiento De La Biodiversidad En El Salvador” Documento Final
    “Estado del Conocimiento de la Biodiversidad en El Salvador” Documento Final Proyecto Desarrollando capacidades y compartiendo tecnología para la gestión de la biodiversidad en Centroamérica Elaborado por MELIBEA GALLO Noviembre 2005 1 Índice General Índice de Figuras ....................................................................................................................2 Índice de Tablas ......................................................................................................................3 Índice de siglas y abreviaturas ...............................................................................................4 1. Introducción ........................................................................................................................5 2. Objetivo general .................................................................................................................5 3. Objetivos específicos .........................................................................................................5 4. Metodología ......................................................................................................................6 5. Estado del conocimiento ....................................................................................................6 Ecosistemas ..................................................................................................................6 Especies ........................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, Helminth Parasites of Freshwater Fish from Central America
    Zootaxa 1915: 29–53 (2008) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2008 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Helminth parasites of freshwater fish from Central America GUILLERMO SALGADO-MALDONADO Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Biología, Laboratorio de Helmintología, Apartado Postal 70-153 CP 04510, México D. F. Mexico. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract This study is a compilation of current knowledge of the taxonomic composition and distribution of the helminth parasites of freshwater fish in Central America. A list of 111 adult helminth species up to day reported from 17 freshwater fish families from Central America was compiled. The data show a helminth parasite fauna in freshwater fish that is typical to the region. One hundred and two of the known helminth species are endemic to the area, 32 of which can be derived from South American genera. Nematodes were the most abundant group, followed by monogeneans and trematodes. None of the 29 helminth families recorded to date is exclusive to Central America, while 16 of the 65 recorded genera have been only recorded from this area. Twenty three of these genera are South American lineages. The data suggest that helminth parasites of freshwater fish from Central America constitute a recent fauna derived mainly from South America but not found there. Key words: parasites; helminths; checklist; freshwater fishes; Central America; zoogeography; Platyhelminthes; Trema- toda; Monogenea; Cestoda; Nematoda; Acanthocephala; Cichlidae; Poeciliidae; Characidae; Heptapteridae; cichlids; poeciliids endemism. Introduction Freshwater fish in Central America constitute a faunal assemblage distinct from those of North and South America, and the species within it are parasitized by their own helminth fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • The Management of Ornamental Fish in Australia
    A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL FISH IN AUSTRALIA Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council November 2006 © Commonwealth of Australia 2007 ISBN 921192 18 6 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Attorney General’s Department, Robert Garran Offices, National Circuit, Barton ACT 2600 or posted at http://www.ag.gov.au/cca. The Australian Government acting through the Bureau of Rural Sciences has exercised due care and skill in the preparation and compilation of the information and data set out in this publication. Notwithstanding, the Bureau of Rural Sciences, its employees and advisers disclaim all liability, including liability for negligence, for any loss, damage, injury, expense or cost incurred by any person as a result of accessing, using or relying upon any of the information or data set out in this publication to the maximum extent permitted by law. Postal address: Bureau of Rural Sciences GPO Box 858 Canberra, ACT 2601 Copies available from: BRS Publication Sales GPO Box 858 Canberra ACT 2601 Telephone 1800 020 157 Fax (02) 6272 2330 Email [email protected] Internet http://www.brs.gov.au CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 1 5 MANAGEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL PESTS AND NOXIOUS SPECIES IN AUSTRALIA . 19 1 INTRODUCTION . 2 6 COMMUNICATION PLAN . 23 Need for a national approach .
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Diversity, Zoogeography, and Ecological Gradients in Honduran Freshwater Fishes
    The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Dissertations Summer 8-2010 Patterns of Diversity, Zoogeography, and Ecological Gradients in Honduran Freshwater Fishes Wilfredo Antonio Matamoros University of Southern Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations Part of the Biology Commons, and the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Matamoros, Wilfredo Antonio, "Patterns of Diversity, Zoogeography, and Ecological Gradients in Honduran Freshwater Fishes" (2010). Dissertations. 979. https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations/979 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The University of Southern Mississippi PATTERNS OF DIVERSITY, ZOOGEOGRAPHY, AND ECOLOGICAL GRADIENTS IN HONDURAN FRESHWATER FISHES by Wilfredo Antonio Matamoros Abstract of a Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of The University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2010 ABSTRACT PATTERNS OF DIVERSITY, ZOOGEOGRAPHY, AND ECOLOGICAL GRADIENTS IN HONDURAN FRESHWATER FISHES by Wilfredo Antonio Matamoros August 2010 Nineteen major river drainages across Honduras were sampled from 2005-2009 in order to understand Honduran geographical patterns of freshwater fish distribution, to delineate the Honduran freshwater fishes ichthyographical provinces, and to understand patterns of species assemblage at the drainage level. A total of 166 species of freshwater fishes were sampled, a 64% increase over previously published reports. Eight species belong to primary freshwater families, 47 to secondary, and 111 to peripherals. In order to understand the species-drainages relationships, a presence-absence matrix was built for the 19 major drainages and 55 primary and secondary freshwater fishes.
    [Show full text]