East Texas Historical Journal Volume 27 Issue 2 Article 5 10-1989 The Second Battle of San Jacinto Max S. Lale Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ethj Part of the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Recommended Citation Lale, Max S. (1989) "The Second Battle of San Jacinto," East Texas Historical Journal: Vol. 27 : Iss. 2 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ethj/vol27/iss2/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in East Texas Historical Journal by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. EAST TEXAS HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION 3 THE SECOND BATTLE OF SAN JACINTO by Max S. Lale A controversy arising out of events immediately following the Battle of San Jacinto on April 21, 1836, and involving some of Texas' most notable figures, including Sam Houston, resulted in a libel suit which was not settled until November 20, 1866. The settlement came eighteen months after the Civil War had ended and more than thirty years after what may have been the wanton killing of a high-ranking prisoner of war, another prisoner, and one or more Mexican women. These allegations were brought to public attention by an article in the Texas Almanac for 1859, "San Jacinto Campaign," written by Dr. N.D. Labadie, a surgeon with the Texian army then living in Galveston, where he operated a pharmacy. In addition to medicines his wares also were advertised to include oils, varnishes, window glass, garden seed, cypress and pine shingles, plastering lath, books, and "fine bricks." References were made in the article to Colonel John Forbes, commissary of the Texian army, which he believed defamed his character and damaged his reputation.