DOCSLIB.ORG

James Pinckney Henderson in Europe: The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
James Pinckney Henderson in Europe: The t; .... JAMES PINCKNEY HENDERSON IN EUROPE: THE DIPLOMACY OF THE REPUBLIC OF TEXAS, 1837-1840 by STEVEN GRADY GAMBLE, B.A., M.A. A DISSERTATION IN HISTORY Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approve(^/9 December, 19 76 (Lop-2 Copyright by STEVEN GRADY GAMBLE 1976 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am deeply indebted to Professor James V. Reese for his direction of this dissertation and to the other members of my committee. Professors Seymour V. Connor, Brian L. Blakeley, Harry A. Jebsen, Key Ray Chong, and Dahlia J. Terrell for their helpful criticism. 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ii INTRODUCTION 1 Chapter I. THE DIPLOMATIC CONTEXT: THE UNITED STATES AND TEXAS, 1836-1837 8 II. BRITAIN: THE TEXAS QUESTION, 1836-1837 ... 37 III. BRITAIN: THE INITIAL MEETING 84 IV. BRITAIN: DELAY AND DISAPPOINTMENT 116 V. FRANCE: THE PRELIMINARY CONTACTS 162 VI. FRANCE: FRUSTRATION AND POSTPONEMENT . .19 7 VII. FRANCE: SUCCESS 225 VIII. BRITAIN: A FINAL ATTEMPT 249 EPILOGUE 300 BIBLIOGRAPHY 304 • • • 111 INTRODUCTION The migration of settlers from the United States to the Mexican province of Texas in the 1820s and 1830s was still another step in the western advancement of American civilization in the nineteenth century. Encour­ aged by the promise of cheap Texan land, immigrants came by the hundreds, and by the early 1830s these expatriates had achieved numerical superiority. In 1834, Santa Anna emerged as dictator of Mexico, dissolved Congress, and abrogated the Constitution of 1824, the republican docu­ ment under which the American settlers had immigrated and which granted the provinces a large degree of self- government. The inhabitants of Texas rebelled against Santa Anna and his Centralist government, proclaiming their fight to be for the reestablishment of the 1824 constitution. By March 1836, this struggle had developed into more than a constitutional battle; it had become a war for independence. After declaring their freedom from the Mexican government, the Texans established their credibility on the battlefield of San Jacinto. However, regardless of the immediate success enjoyed by the neophyte Republic of Texas, her people faced a clouded future, unsure of their destiny. During her decade of existence, the Republic never attained security. In fact, much of her history was that of a struggle for survival, be it on the military, eco­ nomic, or diplomatic front. The leaders of Texas developed a variety of strategies for meeting this situation, pro­ posing first one course and then another which they hoped would achieve stability. Thus, much of the political his­ tory of the Republic was shaped by the conflict among the advocates of the different proposals for dealing with the unusual circumstances in which the Republic existed. Insofar as defense was concerned, for example, some, like Mirabeau B. Lamar, favored an aggressive policy toward Mexico, urging that the best method to gain security was to take the fight to a divided Mexico. Others, like Sam Houston, argued that the proper course was "to let sleeping dogs lie," to do nothing which might provoke the Mexicans to lay aside their own domestic differences over the one issue which might unite them, the desire to reconquer Texas In economic matters, the divisions were far less severe; the major problem, fiscal instability, affected all segments of the Republic's populace. Once again dif­ ferent solutions were suggested to solve this problem, ranging from a large loan from foreign sources to the utilization of land scrip as currency. However, all such schemes for economic stability would become invalid un­ less investors could be convinced that the Republic's future was assured. In the early months of the Republic, the great majority of her citizens favored a panacea—annexation to the United States. If Texas could become incorporated into the Union, her defensive worries would be assumed by the mother country, her financial problems could be alle­ viated, and her future would be assured. However, owing to various considerations, President Andrew Jackson delayed recognition until his final day in office and refrained from accepting the Republic's annexation proposal. Thus, Texas was left to determine her own fate. As the months passed and it became clear that no immediate attempt to reinvade Texas would follow on the heels of the Republic's victory at San Jacinto, and as the evidence mounted that a union with the United States was not imminent, it became apparent to the Texan officials that European powers should be approached for assistance. Many felt that an acknowledgment of the Republic's inde­ pendence by one or more of the major nations of the world would foster great political and economic security and increase the possibility for annexation. However, even in the area of diplomacy differences appeared among political leaders and factions. Most Texans continued to believe that annexation was their only salvation and thus felt that a relationship with any European nation was important only as it affected relations with the United States. Others dissented, how­ ever, pointing to the benefits of European relations in a state of permanent independence for some indefinite length of time. But whether annexation or lasting independence was the goal, all agreed that European recognition was very desirable, either as a tool with which to prod a reluctant United States into accepting the Republic's annexation proposal, or as an essential step in gaining ap­ proval of Texas' loan requests and land titles. Further­ more, recognition was a prerequisite to obtaining the commercial treaties needed to establish a healthy economy. Thus, regardless of the motivation, virtually all of the leaders of the Republic agreed by the spring of 1837 that a representative should be dispatched to Europe to approach the major powers concerning acknowledgment of Texan inde­ pendence . The European diplomacy of the Republic of Texas has been an area of concentration for several scholars, but virtually all have chosen to focus on the period from 1840-1845. Electing to analyze the role European nations played in the annexation of Texas to the United States, these historians treat the 1836-1839 period only in passing or for background. Several monographs regarding the Repub­ lic's negotiations with Britain exist which discuss, in varying degrees of detail, the diplomacy of the late 1830s. Ephraim D. Adams, in British Interests and Activities in Texas, 1838-1846, exhibits the traditional view that the existence of slavery in the Republic was the chief impedi­ ment to recognition during the period from 1836-18 39, while Stanley Siegel and Seymour V. Connor second Adams' asser­ tion as well as emphasize Britain's desire to avoid the rupture with Mexico that would undoubtedly occur should she acknowledge Texan independence. Much less has been written regarding French rela­ tions with Texas during this period. Joseph Schmitz's Texan Statecraft and Herbert R. Edwards, "Diplomatic Rela­ tions between France and the Republic of Texas, 18 36-1845," provide an outline of the diplomacy, but neither contains 2 comprehensive analysis. Furthermore, both were written Ephraim D. Adams, British Interests and Activities in Texas, 1838-1846 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1910) 18; Seymour V. Connor, Adventure in Glory (Austin: Steck- Vaughn Company, 1965), 58-59; Stanley Siegel, A Political History of the Texas Republic, 1836-1845 (Austin: Univer- sity of Texas Press, 1956), 88; see also, Joseph VI. Schmitz, Texan Statecraft, 1836-1845 (San Antonio: The Naylor Com- pany, 1941), 64; Justin H Smith, The Annexation of Texas New York, 1911; reprint ed., New York: Ams Press, 19 71) , 78; J. L. Worley, "The Diplomatic Relations of England and the Republic of Texas," Texas State Historical Association Quarterly, X (July, 1905), 4; Mary Lee Spence, "British Interests and Attitudes regarding the Republic of Texas and Its Annexation by the United States" (Ph.D. disserta­ tion. University of Minnesota, 1957), 7, 238; and Philip C. Sturges, "Great Britain and the Annexation of Texas" (Ph.D. dissertation. University of Utah, 1951), 54-55. ^Schmitz, Texan Statecraft, 67-79; Herbert R. Edwards, "Diplomatic Relations between France and the Republic of Texas, 1836-1845," Southwestern Historical Quarterly, XX (January, 1917), 209-241; see also Mary K. Chase, Negociations de la Republique du Texas en Europe, 1837-1845 (Paris: Librairie Ancienne Honore Champion, 1932), 23-40. prior to the publication of Nancy Barker's The French Legation in Texas, an excellently edited work which supplies previously unexamined material relative to the 3 French policy toward Texas. The conclusions of these scholars are generally based on rather cursory, and, in some cases unanalytical and uncritical, examinations of relevant documents, espe­ cially those edited by George P. Garrison in Diplomatic Correspondence of the Republic of Texas.4 While slavery and relations with Mexico were undoubtedly important factors in European policy toward the Republic, perhaps they were not the only major considerations. The ultimate decision on the extension of recognition to Texas in the late 1830s was a determination reached by officials who had to evaluate the impact recognition would have on their own nation's foreign, domestic and colonial affairs. An examination of these considerations should depict a clearer, more complete picture of the various issues which impacted on diplomacy. It should also provide a test of the valid­ ity of conclusions reached, at least partially, by induc­ tive rather than deductive methods. Nancy Nichols Barker, trans, and ed.. The French Legation in Texas, 2 vols. (Austin: Texas State Histori­ cal Association, 1971). ^George P. Garrison, ed.. Diplomatic Correspon­ dence of the Republic of Texas, 3 vols. (Washington, D. C American Historical Association, 1908-1911) (hereafter referred to as TDC). To treat the Republic's European diplomacy from 1836-1839, it is necessary to study and evaluate the activ­ ities of the Texan agent in Europe, James Pinckney Hender­ son.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 12 Section 2 Texas Independence Objectives: 1
    Chapter 12 Section 2 Texas Independence Objectives: 1. What did Mexico offer to attract colonists to Texas and discuss what Mexicans hoped Americans would do in the Texas. 2. Give three reasons there was tension between Texas and Mexico 3. Be able to create a timeline of events that led to Texas independence 4. Give the problem facing Texas after independence and the conflict in the United States on whether to annex Texas. VI. Texas was a Mexican Colony A. Mexico wanted to attract new people to Texas 1. In 1821, the first leader was Stephen Austin a. He led 300 families b. Each received 640 acres of land 2. By 1830 there were over 20,000 people a. Most were southern slave owners B. Mexico believed that Americans would 1. Develop the land 2. Control the Native Americans VII. Soon Texas becomes a Mexican problem A. Settlers were to 1. Speak Spanish 2. Become Catholic 3. No slaves VIII. The Battles for Texas A. There were two battles that started Texas independence 1. Gonzales was the first Texan victory 2. The second victory was San Antonio B. The most famous battle in Texas history is the Alamo 1. This was a Mexican victory 2. The battle last 12 days 3. ALL 187 defenders were killed 4. This becomes a rally cry for Texans as Remember the Alamo a. Made Texans want to fight harder C. The final victory was the Battle of San Jacinto 1. The forces were led by Sam Houston 2. The battle lasted only 18 minutes 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Resignations and Removals: a History of Federal Judicial Service-And Disservice-1789-1992
    RESIGNATIONS AND REMOVALS: A HISTORY OF FEDERAL JUDICIAL SERVICE-AND DISSERVICE-1789-1992 EMILY FIELD VAN TASSEL- Thomas Jefferson's dismay over the failed impeachment of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Chase in 1805 led him later to complain that "impeachment is not even a scarecrow."1 Subse- quent events have proven Jefferson wrong. Although the full panoply of the impeachment process has been used rarely, its existence has given Congress an impressively big stick to wield in persuading miscreant judges to leave the bench.2 Since Jefferson's time, our experience has suggested two important conclusions about judicial discipline and removal. The first is that investigations, threats of investigations, and threats of impeachment can be very powerful tools in inducing judges to resign from office voluntarily. The second is that these tools have a great potential for misuse. Judicial independence is a core value supported by the constitu- tional structure of the federal judiciary. The appointment process, salary protection, and removal mechanism are all means to ensure that federal judges be independent and impartial in their decision- t Visiting Associate Professor, Widener University School of Law. This Article is dedicated to the memory of my brother, Dirck Van Tassel. An earlier version of this Article was prepared as a report to the National Commission onjudicial Discipline and Removal, while I was Associate Historian with the Federal judicial History Office of the Federal Judicial Center. The views and conclusions expressed in this Article are my own and do not necessarily represent the views of the FederalJudicial Center, which, on matters of policy, speaks only through its Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Service Non-Formula Support Items
    Strategic Fiscal Review 2020-21- House Public Service Non-Formula Support Items Overview and Significant Findings 1. Public Service Items. Public Service items are non-formula support items generally categorized under the Public Service Objective in the budget structures of institutions of higher education. Public Service items are programs established primarily to provide non- instructional services beneficial to individuals and groups external to the institution, and are funded in the bill patterns of every public university system, including The University of Texas System, Texas A&M University System, Texas Tech University System, University of North Texas System, University of Houston System, and Texas State University System, as well as independent institutions and the Public Community and Junior Colleges. Public Service items are identified through the strategic planning and budget structure process, in which institutions categorize non-formula support item strategies under bill pattern objectives and receive approval or disapproval of any budget structure changes from the LBB and the Governor's Office. 2. Scope of Review. For Strategic Fiscal Review, there are 106 non-formula support items that are identified as Public Service. Of these 106 items: 95 are at the General Academic Institutions: . 32 at The University of Texas System; . 20 at the Texas A&M System; . 7 at the University of Houston System; . 2 at the University of North Texas System; . 8 at the Texas Tech University System; . 18 at the Texas State University System; and . 8 at independent institutions. 5 are at the Health Related Institutions: . 1 at The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; . 1 at Texas A&M University System Health Science Center; and .
    [Show full text]
  • David Crocketts Visit to the Red River Valley
    East Texas Historical Journal Volume 37 Issue 1 Article 7 3-1999 David Crocketts visit to the Red River Valley Skipper Steely Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ethj Part of the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Recommended Citation Steely, Skipper (1999) "David Crocketts visit to the Red River Valley," East Texas Historical Journal: Vol. 37 : Iss. 1 , Article 7. Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ethj/vol37/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in East Texas Historical Journal by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 16 EAST TEXAS HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION DAVID CROCKETT'S VISIT TO THE RED RIVER VALLEY by Skipper Steely The Red River Valley west of the Great Bend saw basically three waves ofAmerican Anglo settlers arriving between 1815 and 1836. Those who came during the five years before the Mississippi Choctaw Treaty of Doak's Stand (1820) were the first. Many of this group moved to southeast Texas. About eighty other families joined Stephen F. Austin when their land claims north of the Red River were given to the incoming Indians. The second wave of Americans arrived at the American settlements during the next decade, joining relatives and former friends who remained in what was called Miller County, Arkansas Territory. This governmental entity, once a part ofthe large Hempstead County, was after 1828 located south of the Red River, stretching from the Great Bend as far west as civilization expanded, or basically to what is now Fannin County.
    [Show full text]
  • The Texian Sept
    Calendar of Events 2015 Quarterly Meetings THE TEXIAN Sept. 11-12, 2015 La Quinta Inn & Suites Belton, 229 West Loop 121, The Official Publication of The Sons of the Republic of Texas Belton, TX 76513; (866) 527-1498, Room Rate $101 + tax, cut off date August 21, 2015; Please identify yourself as SRT. VOL VIII NUMBER 3 AUGUST 2015 Hampton Inn & Suites, 7006 Navarro, Victoria, TX 77904; Dec. 4-5, 2015 ND (361) 573-9911, Room Rate $99 + tax, 1 King or 2 Queen NEWS RELEASE FOR THE 202 ANNIVERSARY OF THE BATTLE OF MEDINA cut off date November 18, 2015; Please identify yourself as AUGUST 15, 2015 SRT. The public is invited to attend our 15th annual ceremony commemorating the Battle of Medina, this being the 202nd anniversary of the bloodiest battle in Texas history! The Battle of Medina occurred on August 18, 1813 2015 SRT Events between the Royal Spanish Army and the Republican Army of the North when between 800 and 1,300 Ameri- March 2 Texas Independence Day March 6 Fall of the Alamo cans, Tejanos, Indians, and Spanish soldiers died in this all but forgotten battle which historians have named March 27 Goliad Massacre the Gutierrez-Magee Expedition. Since August 18th is on Tuesday this year, we will hold our normal com- April 21 San Jacinto Day memorative ceremony beginning at 10:00 a.m. on Saturday, August 15, 2015 under the large Oak trees on Old September 19 Texian Navy Day on the Battleship Texas Applewhite Road. We will have a Color Guard representing the U.S.A., Spain, Texas and Mexico, plus descen- October 2 Battle of Gonzales dants of the men who fought and died in this battle.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthony Butler: a Flawed Diplomat
    East Texas Historical Journal Volume 24 Issue 1 Article 5 3-1986 Anthony Butler: A Flawed Diplomat Gerald D. Saxon Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ethj Part of the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Recommended Citation Saxon, Gerald D. (1986) "Anthony Butler: A Flawed Diplomat," East Texas Historical Journal: Vol. 24 : Iss. 1 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ethj/vol24/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in East Texas Historical Journal by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. I EAST TEXAS HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION 3 ANTHONY BUTLER: A FLAWED DIPLOMAT by Gerald D. Saxon Anthony Wayne Butler tried desperately to shape the destiny of both the United States and pre-revolutionary Texas. As the American charge d'affaires to Mexico during the Andrew Jackson administra­ tion, Butler, driven by contravening motives of duty to himself and duty to the country, doggedly pursued one of Old Hickory's primary diplomatic objectives - the acquisition of Texas from the Republic of Mexico. With his political and financial future tied to the success of the Texas initiative, Butler worked zealously and at times unscrupulously to acquire the land west ofthe Sabine River. Despite his untiring efforts, Butler's mission ended in failure, a failure resulting as much from his ambition and ego as from the political instability of the Mexican Republic. Butler was born in South Carolina in 1787 (the exact date of his birth is unknown), and he spent his life scrambling for prestige and position.
    [Show full text]
  • Litchfield Enquirer. Vol
    LITCHFIELD ENQUIRER. VOL. VI. LITCHFIELD, (CONN.) THURSDAY, DECEMBER 15, 1831. No. 27.—Whole No. 287. ZLttcljftcnr lEuQuCrcr: TWENTY-SECOND CONGRESS. accurate judgment of its operation, there is I cial privileges, under the construction they tfresOrettt’ff JHeasaac- reason to to the PUBLISHED EVERT THURSDAY MORNING, every believe that it will prove high- gave Treaty for the cession of Louisi- SENATE. 1 beneficial. The trade authorized ana. By Washington, Dec. 6. ly thereby HENRY ADAMS. Maine. North-Carolina. has Should this This at 12 o’clock, the President of the United employed, to the 30th September last, Treaty receive the sanc- John Bedford day, proper ^ERMS. Holme*, Brown, Stales, by hii Private Secretary, communicated to the upwards of 30,000 tons of American, and 15,- tion, n source of irritation will be Peleg Sprague. Willie P. Mnngum. two stopped, * Houses of Congress the following 000 tons of outward that has for so To village and single mail subscriber* 2 dollars per New-Hampshire. South-Carolina. foreign shipping in the many years, in some degree, before Ibe of six month*. : year, payable expiration Samuel Belt, Robert Y. Hay ne, MESSAGE voyages ; and, in the inward, nearly an equal alienated from each other, two nations, who To of number over 50 companies any six, $1 per Isaac Hill. Stephen D. Miller. Fellow Citizens the Senate, amount of American, and 20,000 only of for- from interest, as well as the remembrance of year, payable as above. To companies less than six, Vermont. of Georgia. : have resulted to 75 as before. 25 cents will and House eign tonnage.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Reads As Upon Certain Claims of Yetta Mae Slayton; Committee on Banking and Currency
    1838 tONGRESSIONAL RECORD- SENATp March 11 H. R. 3859. A bill for the relief of Jose Commerce and National Association of Man­ the Journal of the proceedings of Mon­ Zavala-Rivera; to the Committee on the ufacturers, the New Jersey State Chamber day, March 9, 1953, be dispensed with. Judiciary. · of Commerce, and others, a similar declara­ The PRESIDENT pro tempore. With­ By Mr. BURLESON: tion of policy and since prices depend upon H. R. 3860. A bill conferring jurisdiction wages, that similar suggestions be made to out objection-- upon the United States District Court for the the major labor organizations, such as the Mr. MORSE. Mr. President, reserv­ Northern District of -Texas, Abilene division, American Federation of Labor and the Con­ ing the right to object, rule III of the to hear, determine, and render judgment gress of Industrial Organizations; to the Standing Rules of the Senate reads as upon certain claims of Yetta Mae Slayton; Committee on Banking and Currency. follows: to the Committee on the Judiciary. 80. By the SPEAKER: Petition of R. G. Roberts, of Seattle, Wash., and others, rela­ The Presiding Officer having taken the H. R. 3861. A bill for the relief of Fumiko chair, and a quorum being present, the tive to the present financial and taxation Nakane; to the Committee on the Judiciary. Journal of the preceding day shall be read, By Mr. CELLER: systems of the Government and enclosing a proposed bill entitled "Financial Emancipa­ and any mistake made in the entries cor­ H. R. 3862. A bil'. for the relief of Alek­ rected.
    [Show full text]
  • H. Doc. 108-222
    SEVENTY-SEVENTH CONGRESS JANUARY 3, 1941, TO JANUARY 3, 1943 FIRST SESSION—January 3, 1941, to January 2, 1942 SECOND SESSION—January 5, 1942, 1 to December 16, 1942 VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 2—JOHN N. GARNER, 3 of Texas; HENRY A. WALLACE, 4 of Iowa PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE SENATE—PAT HARRISON, 5 of Mississippi; CARTER GLASS, 6 of Virginia SECRETARY OF THE SENATE—EDWIN A. HALSEY, of Virginia SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE SENATE—CHESLEY W. JURNEY, of Texas SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES—SAM RAYBURN, 7 of Texas CLERK OF THE HOUSE—SOUTH TRIMBLE, 8 of Kentucky SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE HOUSE—KENNETH ROMNEY, of Montana DOORKEEPER OF THE HOUSE—JOSEPH J. SINNOTT, of Virginia POSTMASTER OF THE HOUSE—FINIS E. SCOTT ALABAMA ARKANSAS Albert E. Carter, Oakland SENATORS John H. Tolan, Oakland SENATORS John Z. Anderson, San Juan Bautista Hattie W. Caraway, Jonesboro John H. Bankhead II, Jasper Bertrand W. Gearhart, Fresno John E. Miller, 11 Searcy Lister Hill, Montgomery Alfred J. Elliott, Tulare George Lloyd Spencer, 12 Hope Carl Hinshaw, Pasadena REPRESENTATIVES REPRESENTATIVES Jerry Voorhis, San Dimas Frank W. Boykin, Mobile E. C. Gathings, West Memphis Charles Kramer, Los Angeles George M. Grant, Troy Wilbur D. Mills, Kensett Thomas F. Ford, Los Angeles Henry B. Steagall, Ozark Clyde T. Ellis, Bentonville John M. Costello, Hollywood Sam Hobbs, Selma Fadjo Cravens, Fort Smith Leland M. Ford, Santa Monica Joe Starnes, Guntersville David D. Terry, Little Rock Lee E. Geyer, 14 Gardena Pete Jarman, Livingston W. F. Norrell, Monticello Cecil R. King, 15 Los Angeles Walter W.
    [Show full text]
  • Calculated for the Use of the State Of
    i: m^4- 3n.3M31 H41 A " REGISTER, AND FOR 1835. ALSO CITY OFFICERS IN BOSTON, AND OTHER USEFUL INFORMATION. BOSTON: JAMES LORING, 132 WASHINGTON STREET. — ECLIPSES IN 1835. Tliere will be bvt two Eclipses this year of the Sun, and one of the Monty and a Transit of Mercury, as follows, viz.— I. The first will be of the Sun, May, 27th day, 8h. 48m. evening, invisible. II. The second will be of the Moon, June, 10th day, 6h. Im. eve- ning, invisible. III. The third will be of the Sun, November, 26th day, 5h. 46m. morning, invisible. The Transit of the Planet Mercury, over the Sun's Disk, will take place, November, 7th day, partly visible, as follows, viz. Transit begins Oh. 46m. "^ Mercury wholly entered on the Sun...O 49 / Mo=n *imtx Nearest the Sun's centre 3 21 V^t^n®^®"' Sun's lowest limb sets 4 42 C Transit ends 5 56 j ^ Nearest approach to the Sun's centre, 5m. 34sec. ^fCr The Compiler of the Register has endeavoured to be accurate in all the statements and names which it contains ; but when the difficulties in such a compilation are considered, and the constant changes which are occurring, by new elections, deaths, &c. it is seen at once to be impossible to attain perfect accuracy. He therefore distinctly states, that he declines this responsibleness, and only pre- sents information to the best of his knowledge. 3)7,3 M3 Mil A INDEX. Academy of Music ... 165 Convention of Cong. Min. 123 Agricultural Society ..
    [Show full text]
  • Biographical Directory Bia, S.C
    1200 Biographical Directory bia, S.C. in 1868; associate justice of the State supreme courtpractice of law; resided in Fort Wayne, md., until his death 1868-1870; successfully contested as a Republican the elec-there October 23, 1973; interment in Lindenwood Cemetery. tion of J.P. Reed to the Forty-first Congress and served from April 8, 1869, to March 3, 1871; comptroller general of South HOGG, Herschel Millard, a Representative from Colorado; Carolina in 1874 and 1875; elected to the Forty-fourth Con-born in Youngstown, Mahoning County, Ohio, November 21, gress (March 4, 1875-March 3, 1877); was not a candidate for1853; attended the common schools and was graduated from renomination in 1876; moved to Kenton, Ohio, in SeptemberMonmouth College, Monmouth, Ill., in June 1876; studied 1877 and practiced law until 1882; president of the Firstlaw; was admitted to the bar in 1878 and commenced prac- National Bank of Kenton; died in Battle Creek, Mich., Feb-tice in Indianola, Iowa; moved to Gunnison, Cob., in 1881 ruary 23, 1909; interment in Grove Cemetery, Kenton, Ohio.and resumed the practice of law; city attorney of Gunnison HOGE, William (brother of John Hoge), a Representativein 1882 and 1883; district attorney of the seventh judicial from Pennsylvania; born near Hogestown, Cumberlanddistrict of Colorado 1885-1893; moved to Telluride, Cob., in County, Pa., in 1762; received a limited schooling; moved to1888; city attorney 1890-1898; county attorney of San Miguel western Pennsylvania in 1782, where he and his brotherCounty, Cob., 1890-1902;
    [Show full text]
  • "Bring Me His Ears"
    Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2007 with funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/bringmehisearsOOmulfrich "BRING ME fflS EARS" Tom pushed on ahead to reconnoiter the Upper Spring [Page 262^ "Bring Me His Ears" By CLARENCE E. MULFORD Author of The Bar-20 Three; Johnny Nelson; Hopalong Cassidy; Buck Peters, Ranchman; The Man from Bar-20; '' Tex; " Etc. Frontispiece by J. Allen St. John CHICAGO A. C. McCLURG & CO. 1922 Copyright A. C. McClurg & Co. 1922 Published October, 1922 Copyrighted in Great Britain PriiUed in the United States of America M. A. DONOHUE ft CO., PRINTERS AND BINDERS. CHICAGO CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I Hawkens' Gun Store i II Aboard the Missouri Belle 13 III Armijo's Strong Arm 19 IV Tom Changes His Plans 38 V The Insult 65 VI Indians and Gamblers yy VII The Wrecking of the Missouri Belle . 95 VIII The New Six-gun 108 IX The Caravan 128 X En Route 151 XI Indian Country 164 XII Pawnees 190 XIII Hurrah for Texas 196 XIV The Valley of the Cimarron 220 XV Texan Scouts 239 XVI The Passing of Pedro 256 XVII "'Spress from Bent's" 271 XVIII Santa Fe 285 XIX The Rendezvous 299 XX Tom Reneges 310 XXI The Kidnapping 323 XXII ''Los Tejanosf' 331 iVil03i20 ''Bring Me His Ears" CHAPTER I HAWKENS' GUN STORE THE tall, lanky Missourian leaning against the cor- ner of a ramshackle saloon on Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri — the St. Louis of the early forties — turned his whiskey-marked face toward his companion, a short and slender Mexican trader, sullenly listening to the latter's torrent of words, which was accompanied by many and excitable gesticulations.
    [Show full text]