DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 3 Appendix World Happiness Report 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 3 Appendix World Happiness Report 2020 Chapter 3 Appendix World Happiness Report 2020 Figure A1: Global Ranking of Cities — Future Life Evaluation (Part 1) Appendix Figure A1: Global Ranking of Cities – Future Life Evaluation Future Subjective Well-Being Rankings Future Subjective Well-Being Rankings (1) 1. Tashkent — Uzbekistan (8.390) 2. San Miguelito — Panama (8.372) 3. San Jose — Costa Rica (8.347) 4. Accra — Ghana (8.297) 5. Panama City — Panama (8.286) 6. Denmark- Aarhus (8.286) 7. Copenhagen — Denmark (8.208) 8. Helsinki — Finland (8.206) 9. Atlanta — USA (8.204) 10. Freetown — Sierra Leone (8.203) 11. Medina — Saudi Arabia (8.170) 12. Doha — Qatar (8.169) 13. Jeddah — Saudi Arabia (8.156) 14. Bogota — Colombia (8.155) 15. Dallas — USA (8.131) 16. Houston — USA (8.130) 17. Riyadh — Saudi Arabia (8.109) 18. Israel- Tel Aviv (8.106) 19. Washington — USA (8.098) 20. Miami — USA (8.090) 21. Dubai — UAE (8.089) 22. Oslo — Norway (8.083) 23. Bergen — Norway (8.066) 24. Abu Dhabi — UAE (8.039) 25. Wellington — New Zealand (8.033) 26. Sao Paulo — Brazil (8.032) 27. Toronto Metro — Canada (8.024) 28. Ulaanbaatar — Mongolia (7.985) 29. Lima Metro — Peru (7.972) 30. New York — USA (7.964) 31. Los Angeles — USA (7.926) 32. Chicago — USA (7.912) 33. Zurich — Switzerland (7.909) 34. Ashgabat — Turkmenistan (7.904) 35. Mecca — Saudi Arabia (7.902) 36. Philadelphia — USA (7.895) 37. Kuwait City — Kuwait (7.893) 38. Auckland — New Zealand (7.892) 39. Cork — Ireland (7.867) 40. Boston — USA (7.861) 41. Stockholm — Sweden (7.852) 42. Guayaquil — Ecuador (7.850) 43. Jerusalem — Israel (7.849) 44. Christchurch — New Zealand (7.846) 45. Guatemala City — Guatemala (7.825) 46. Melbourne — Australia (7.773) 47. Brisbane — Australia (7.751) 48. Reykjavik — Iceland (7.739) 49. Asuncion Metro — Paraguay (7.735) 50. Santo Domingo — Dominican Republic (7.729) 51. Goteborg — Sweden (7.718) 52. Santiago — Chile (7.712) 53. Managua — Nicaragua (7.705) 54. Lome — Togo (7.686) 55. Dublin — Ireland (7.684) 56. Nairobi — Kenya (7.681) 57. Cotonou — Benin (7.672) 58. La Paz — Bolivia (7.671) 59. Windhoek — Namibia (7.639) 60. Abidjan — Ivory Coast (7.634) 61. Perth — Australia (7.631) 62. Sydney — Australia (7.624) 63. Bishkek — Kyrgyzstan (7.619) 64. Dakar — Senegal (7.616) 65. Santa Cruz — Bolivia (7.615) 66. Mexico City — Mexico (7.600) 67. London — UK (7.587) 68. Almaty — Kazakhstan (7.535) 69. Montevideo — Uruguay (7.525) 70. Cameroon- Yaounde (7.522) 71. Kinshasa — Congo DR (Kinshasa) (7.516) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 29 Figure A1: Global Ranking of Cities — Future Life Evaluation (Part 2) (Figure A1 Continued) Future Subjective Well-Being Rankings Future Subjective Well-Being Rankings (2) 72. Quito — Ecuador (7.503) 73. Vienna — Austria (7.497) 74. Tegucigalpa — Honduras (7.488) 75. Buenos Aires — Argentina (7.470) 76. Johannesburg — South Africa (7.443) 77. Douala — Cameroon (7.435) 78. Cape Town — South Africa (7.431) 79. Bamako — Mali (7.407) 80. Kathmandu — Nepal (7.395) 81. Manama — Bahrain (7.372) 82. Niamey — Niger (7.366) 83. San Pedro Sula — Honduras (7.356) 84. Metro Bangkok — Thailand (7.354) 85. Monrovia — Liberia (7.351) 86. Metro Manila — Philippines (7.333) 87. Benghazi — Libya (7.309) 88. Conakry — Guinea (7.302) 89. Kumasi — Ghana (7.277) 90. Brazzaville — Congo Brazzaville (7.264) 91. Brussels — Belgium (7.262) 92. Vilnius — Lithuania (7.250) 93. Ouagadougou — Burkina Faso (7.243) 94. Libreville — Gabon (7.164) 95. Singapore (7.144) 96. San Salvador Metro — El Salvador (7.138) 97. Algiers — Algeria (7.137) 98. Mogadishu — Somalia (7.117) 99. Madrid — Spain (7.104) 100. Lusaka — Zambia (7.100) 101. Barcelona — Spain (7.088) 102. Vientiane/Vianchan — Laos (7.081) 103. Tripoli — Libya (7.045) 104. Caracas — Venezuela (7.030) 105. Guangzhou — China (7.015) 106. Riga — Latvia (7.002) 107. Maseru — Lesotho (6.994) 108. Yangon — Myanmar (6.978) 109. Male — Maldives (6.976) 110. Dushanbe — Tajikistan (6.966) 111. Phnom Penh — Cambodia (6.950) 112. Hanoi — Vietnam (6.946) 113. Limassol — Cyprus (6.933) 114. Moscow — Russia (6.931) 115. Belgrade — Serbia (6.930) 116. Pointe-Noire — Congo Brazzaville (6.891) 117. Paris — France (6.883) 118. Casablanca — Morocco (6.854) 119. Baku — Azerbaijan (6.839) 120. Port-Louis — Mauritius (6.832) 121. Antananarivo — Madagascar (6.830) 122. Harare — Zimbabwe (6.821) 123. Shanghai — China (6.807) 124. Gaborone — Botswana (6.806) 125. Prague — Czech Republic (6.798) 126. Amman — Jordan (6.788) 127. St. Petersburg — Russia (6.782) 128. Ho Chi Minh — Vietnam (6.782) 129. Nicosia — Cyprus (6.777) 130. Chisinau — Moldova (6.759) 131. Lahore — Pakistan (6.750) 132. Nouakchott — Mauritania (6.731) 133. Bratislava — Slovakia (6.687) 134. Kaunas — Lithuania (6.668) 135. Lefkosia — Northern Cyprus (6.659) 136. Pafos — Cyprus (6.647) 137. Bucharest — Romania (6.618) 138. Dar es Salaam — Tanzania (6.613) 139. Seoul — South Korea (6.611) 140. Ljubljana — Slovenia (6.576) 141. Skopje — Macedonia (6.571) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 30 World Happiness Report 2020 Figure A1: Global Ranking of Cities — Future Life Evaluation (Part 3) (Figure A1 Continued) Future Subjective Well-Being Rankings Future Subjective Well-Being Rankings (3) 142. Minsk — Belarus (6.555) 143. Karachi — Pakistan (6.518) 144. Sofia — Bulgaria (6.516) 145. Taipei — Taiwan (6.515) 146. Tirana — Albania (6.501) 147. Lisbon — Portugal (6.465) 148. Cyprus- Larnaka (6.456) 149. Maracaibo — Venezuela (6.438) 150. Incheon — South Korea (6.434) 151. Ankara — Turkey (6.430) 152. Tbilisi — Georgia (6.406) 153. Prishtine — Kosovo (6.403) 154. Sarajevo — Bosnia and Herzegovina (6.400) 155. Istanbul — Turkey (6.386) 156. Kigali — Rwanda (6.384) 157. Beijing — China (6.349) 158. Kiev — Ukraine (6.341) 159. Daegu — South Korea (6.291) 160. Tokyo — Japan (6.271) 161. Baghdad — Iraq (6.263) 162. Tallinn — Estonia (6.245) 163. Thessaloniki — Greece (6.221) 164. Colombo — Sri Lanka (6.171) 165. Budapest — Hungary (6.156) 166. Bangui — CAR (6.143) 167. Izmir — Turkey (6.139) 168. Busan — South Korea (6.137) 169. Tunis — Tunisia (6.077) 170. NDjamena — Chad (6.038) 171. Zagreb — Croatia (5.982) 172. Hong Kong (5.755) 173. South Sudan- Juba (5.684) 174. Cairo — Egypt (5.641) 175. Khartoum — Sudan (5.624) 176. Yerevan — Armenia (5.590) 177. Mashhad — Iran (5.573) 178. Tehran — Iran (5.565) 179. Alexandria — Egypt (5.550) 180. Athens — Greece (5.495) 181. Sanaa — Yemen (5.039) 182. Delhi — India (5.032) 183. Beirut — Lebanon (4.760) 184. Port-au-Prince — Haiti (4.653) 185. Gaza — Palestine (4.511) 186. Kabul — Afghanistan (3.594) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Notes: The list takes into account all cities worldwide with at least 300 observations in the Gallup World Poll during the period 2014-2018 as well as the ten largest cities in the US using data from the Gallup US Poll. The outcome measure is futureNotes: life Theevaluation list takes on a intozero-to-ten account scale. all citiesFigures worldwide are raw means. with Confidence at least 300 bands observations are 95%. in the Sources: GallupGallup World World Poll, Gallup Poll duringUS Poll. the period 2014-2018 as well as the ten largest cities in the US us- ing data from the Gallup US Daily Poll. The outcome measure is future life evaluation on a zero-to-ten scale. Figures are raw means. Confidence bands are 95%. Sources: Gallup World Poll, Gallup US Daily Poll. 31 Figure A2: Global Ranking of Cities in Terms of Positive Affect (Part 1) Figure A2: Global Ranking of Cities in Terms of Positive Affect Positive affect Positive affect (1) 1. Asuncion Metro — Paraguay (0.892) 2. Mogadishu — Somalia (0.877) 3. Vientiane/Vianchan — Laos (0.873) 4. San Pedro Sula — Honduras (0.867) 5. Quito — Ecuador (0.862) 6. San Jose — Costa Rica (0.860) 7. Cork — Ireland (0.857) 8. Reykjavik — Iceland (0.855) 9. Santiago — Chile (0.853) 10. Montevideo — Uruguay (0.850) 11. Dallas — USA (0.849) 12. San Miguelito — Panama (0.849) 13. Houston — USA (0.849) 14. Tegucigalpa — Honduras (0.848) 15. Washington — USA (0.847) 16. Auckland — New Zealand (0.846) 17. Chicago — USA (0.846) 18. Taipei — Taiwan (0.845) 19. Guayaquil — Ecuador (0.845) 20. Atlanta — USA (0.845) 21. Metro Manila — Philippines (0.843) 22. Guatemala City — Guatemala (0.843) 23. Colombo — Sri Lanka (0.842) 24. Beijing — China (0.841) 25. Buenos Aires — Argentina (0.840) 26. Denmark- Aarhus (0.836) 27. Miami — USA (0.834) 28. Shanghai — China (0.832) 29. Wellington — New Zealand (0.832) 30. Mexico City — Mexico (0.832) 31. Bogota — Colombia (0.831) 32. Christchurch — New Zealand (0.831) 33. Phnom Penh — Cambodia (0.831) 34. Managua — Nicaragua (0.829) 35. Boston — USA (0.828) 36. Philadelphia — USA (0.828) 37. Panama City — Panama (0.827) 38. San Salvador Metro — El Salvador (0.825) 39. Toronto Metro — Canada (0.825) 40. Copenhagen — Denmark (0.824) 41. Bergen — Norway (0.824) 42. Metro Bangkok — Thailand (0.821) 43. Guangzhou — China (0.821) 44. Lima Metro — Peru (0.819) 45. London — UK (0.819) 46. New York — USA (0.818) 47. Dublin — Ireland (0.817) 48. Perth — Australia (0.815) 49. Port-Louis — Mauritius (0.815) 50. Sweden- Goteborg (0.815) 51. Oslo — Norway (0.813) 52. Singapore (0.811) 53. Bratislava — Slovakia (0.808) 54. Stockholm — Sweden (0.807) 55. Bamako — Mali (0.801) 56. Yangon — Myanmar (0.801) 57. Maracaibo — Venezuela (0.800) 58. Kigali — Rwanda (0.799) 59.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Innovative Financing Schemes for Urban Transport Projects in India
    Latin America : Innovative financing schemes for urban transport projects in India Arnaud Dauphin Lead Urban Transport specialist Urban Mobility India New Delhi, November 2015 1 AFD, the French Development Bank 70 countries India since 2006 8 billion € commitment /year 300-400 million € /year 1 billion € for transport /year Bangalore, Kochi, Nagpur metros 2 BRAZIL : Salvador de Bahia Metro Line 1 and 2 3 Brazil : Salvador de Bahia – Project map Population : 4,4 M inhab. Length : 33,4 km 19 stations Commissioning: 2015 – 2020 Ridership: 500 000 pax/day -2016 4 Brazil : Salvador de Bahia – Main features Owner Federative State of Bahia Scope Greenfield - Brownfield project : 2 metro lines, 33,4km, 19 stations and passenger transfer terminals Investments cost US$ 1 bln (6605 Kr) Public funding $620 M – 3945 Kr (64%) Private financing $380 M - 2660 Kr (36%) IFI’s Involvement No but on going discussion with AFD for LRT rehabilitation Project structuring PPP – DBFOM Contractor CCR metro Bahia (Camargo Correa group) Construction schedule 42 months Operation 30 years (but operation in 9 months) 5 Brazil : Salvador de Bahia – financial mechanisms International bidding process Fixed amount of public financing disbursed on milestone- based payment during the construction (8 milestones) A minimum ridership threshold is guaranteed by the Owner in the tender docs (500 000 px/day) Bid evaluation based on the level of remuneration requested by the concessionaire to balance the project Concessionaire able to get concessional loans from BNDES
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Sustainable Development in Lima Through Public Transportation Investment Kyle Fischer Lehigh University
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Lehigh University: Lehigh Preserve Lehigh University Lehigh Preserve Volume 35 - Leveraging Peru's Economic Potential Perspectives on Business and Economics (2017) 2017 Improving Sustainable Development in Lima Through Public Transportation Investment Kyle Fischer Lehigh University Follow this and additional works at: https://preserve.lehigh.edu/perspectives-v35 Recommended Citation Fischer, Kyle, "Improving Sustainable Development in Lima Through Public Transportation Investment" (2017). Volume 35 - Leveraging Peru's Economic Potential (2017). 6. https://preserve.lehigh.edu/perspectives-v35/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Perspectives on Business and Economics at Lehigh Preserve. It has been accepted for inclusion in Volume 35 - Leveraging Peru's Economic Potential (2017) by an authorized administrator of Lehigh Preserve. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IMPROVING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN LIMA THROUGH PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENT Kyle Fischer Introduction GDP growth rates in Latin America, averaging 5.9 percent per year, with a large percentage Every day citizens of Lima travel across of that growth coming from Lima, the capital the city for work or personal reasons, like city, where over one-third of Peru’s population people all over the world. Yet they face lives (Peru Overview…). For high growth rates more obstacles in their daily travels, with a to continue in the coming years, however, good portion of their time wasted sitting on Lima needs to decrease its income inequality, overcrowded, unregulated, dangerous buses which has seen little improvement over the in traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • August 5, 2021 Garrigues Advises Metro De Lima on US$961 Million
    August 5, 2021 Garrigues advises Metro de Lima on US$961 million financing packages for Lima Metro Line 2 Project Garrigues advised Metro de Lima Linea 2 on a set of financings packages for the Lima Metro Line 2 Project, in an aggregate amount of US$961 million. These packages consisted in (i) a US$811 million off-balance sheet Export Credit Agency backed-financing, and (ii) an amended and restated US$150 million Revolving Construction Facility. Both financings are backed by Peruvian government payments under the Lima Metro Line 2 Project and closed days apart. Lima Metro Line 2 is one of the most ambitious infrastructure projects launched in Latin America under a PPP structure. Under the 35-year concession agreement, 35 km of subway lines will be built, with a total investment of approximatively US$ 5.5bn. Peru employs a unique financing mechanism to minimize construction risk for the Lima Metro Line 2 Project, called RPI-CAOs. These are government-backed milestone-linked receivables that represent the payment obligations of Peru’s Ministry of Transport and Communications. Each RPI-CAO makes available 60 quarterly payments for a period of 15 years to the Project, upon achievement of defined milestones, and will be used to repay lenders under both facilities. KEY HIGHLIGHTS: A. ECA-Backed Facility: The Facility is covered by an export credit guarantee provided by SACE, the Italian Export Credit Agency. The syndicated loan was provided by a set of European banks to a special purpose vehicle, which will purchase the RPI-CAOs from Metro de Lima using funds disbursed by lenders.
    [Show full text]
  • The Urban Rail Development Handbook
    DEVELOPMENT THE “ The Urban Rail Development Handbook offers both planners and political decision makers a comprehensive view of one of the largest, if not the largest, investment a city can undertake: an urban rail system. The handbook properly recognizes that urban rail is only one part of a hierarchically integrated transport system, and it provides practical guidance on how urban rail projects can be implemented and operated RAIL URBAN THE URBAN RAIL in a multimodal way that maximizes benefits far beyond mobility. The handbook is a must-read for any person involved in the planning and decision making for an urban rail line.” —Arturo Ardila-Gómez, Global Lead, Urban Mobility and Lead Transport Economist, World Bank DEVELOPMENT “ The Urban Rail Development Handbook tackles the social and technical challenges of planning, designing, financing, procuring, constructing, and operating rail projects in urban areas. It is a great complement HANDBOOK to more technical publications on rail technology, infrastructure, and project delivery. This handbook provides practical advice for delivering urban megaprojects, taking account of their social, institutional, and economic context.” —Martha Lawrence, Lead, Railway Community of Practice and Senior Railway Specialist, World Bank HANDBOOK “ Among the many options a city can consider to improve access to opportunities and mobility, urban rail stands out by its potential impact, as well as its high cost. Getting it right is a complex and multifaceted challenge that this handbook addresses beautifully through an in-depth and practical sharing of hard lessons learned in planning, implementing, and operating such urban rail lines, while ensuring their transformational role for urban development.” —Gerald Ollivier, Lead, Transit-Oriented Development Community of Practice, World Bank “ Public transport, as the backbone of mobility in cities, supports more inclusive communities, economic development, higher standards of living and health, and active lifestyles of inhabitants, while improving air quality and liveability.
    [Show full text]
  • Peru's Infrastructure Investment Guide 2020/2021 for a Comfortable Interactive Experience, We Recommend to Use the Adobe Acrobat App
    Peru's Infrastructure Investment Guide 2020/2021 For a comfortable interactive experience, we recommend to use the Adobe Acrobat app 2 Infrastructure Investment No partGuide of this publication Edited by: may be reproduced, Ernst & Young Consultores SCRL distributed or transmitted in For its publishing trademark: EY any form2020/2021 or by any means, Av. Víctor Andrés Belaunde 171, including photocopying, Urb. El Rosario – San Isidro recording, or other electronic Lima - Peru or mechanical methods, without the prior written Design and layout: permission of the publisher. Carlos Aspiros © All rights reserved Photos: ProInversión, EY, © EY Shutterstock, iStock and Legado © Ernst & Young OficialPE-Flickr. Author(s): First edition - September 2020 Collective work Legal Deposit made at the National Library of Peru N° ISBN: 3 EY PERU OFFICES EY INFRASTRUCTURE TEAM Lima • Manuel Rivera Av. Jorge Basadre 330 Tax Infrastructure Leader San Isidro - Lima [email protected] Phone: +51 1 411 7331 Phone: +51 1 411 4444 • Juan José Cárdenas Av. Víctor Andrés EY Law Projects and Infrastructure Leader Belaunde 171 [email protected] San Isidro - Lima Phone: +51 1 411 3047 Phone: +51 1 411 4444 • Enrique Oliveros Arequipa Strategy and Transactions Lead Partner Head of Investment Banking EY Latam North Region Av. Bolognesi 407 [email protected] Yanahuara - Arequipa Phone: +51 1 411 4417 Phone: +51 54 484 470 • Mauro Ugaz Chiclayo People Advisory Services Partner Av. Federico Villarreal 115, [email protected] Salón Cinto Phone: +51 1 411 7414 Chiclayo - Lambayeque • Valeria Galindo Phone: +51 74 227 424 People Advisory Services Partner [email protected] Trujillo Phone: +51 1 411 7313 Av.
    [Show full text]
  • Latin Lawyer's Sister Publication Global Investigations Review on 24 August
    BBrazil’srazil’s IG4IG4 acquiresa cquires stake stake in i nPeruvian Peruvia n iinfrastructurenfrastructure group group Aenza Aenza Emily Darby 24 August 2021 Credit: shutterstock/Myriam B Shearman & Sterling LLP in New York and Washington, DC and Miranda & Amado Abogados in Lima have helped Brazilian infrastructure investor IG4 Capital launch a US$58 million tender offer to acquire a stake in Peruvian infrastructure company Aenza, making it the largest shareholder. US law firm Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP and Peru’s Hernández & Cía Abogados advised Aenza in the transaction, while Rubio Leguía Normand in Lima helped a group of Aenza’s selling shareholders. The deal closed on 5 August. The buyer used its private equity fund, IG4 Capital Infrastructure Investments, to complete the transaction. Through the offer, the infrastructure investor purchased 107 million common shares in Aenza for 1.88 Peruvian soles (US$0.46) per ordinary share and 9.40 Peruvian soles (US$2.29) for each American depositary share. With that transaction, IG4 obtained some 12.3% of the target company’s shares. The private equity fund then acquired further shares in Aenza by executing a syndication agreement – a deal that IG4 struck with various Aenza shareholders in November 2019 at the announcement of the tender offer. As part of that contract, the existing stakeholders – including former Aenza executives and founding members of the company – agreed to transfer their shares and voting rights in the company to IG4’s private equity fund. Those investors transferred some 188 million shares to the vehicle, representing a 21.6% stake in the company.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Report Global Metro Projects 2020.Qxp
    Table of Contents 1.1 Global Metrorail industry 2.2.2 Brazil 2.3.4.2 Changchun Urban Rail Transit 1.1.1 Overview 2.2.2.1 Belo Horizonte Metro 2.3.4.3 Chengdu Metro 1.1.2 Network and Station 2.2.2.2 Brasília Metro 2.3.4.4 Guangzhou Metro Development 2.2.2.3 Cariri Metro 2.3.4.5 Hefei Metro 1.1.3 Ridership 2.2.2.4 Fortaleza Rapid Transit Project 2.3.4.6 Hong Kong Mass Railway Transit 1.1.3 Rolling stock 2.2.2.5 Porto Alegre Metro 2.3.4.7 Jinan Metro 1.1.4 Signalling 2.2.2.6 Recife Metro 2.3.4.8 Nanchang Metro 1.1.5 Power and Tracks 2.2.2.7 Rio de Janeiro Metro 2.3.4.9 Nanjing Metro 1.1.6 Fare systems 2.2.2.8 Salvador Metro 2.3.4.10 Ningbo Rail Transit 1.1.7 Funding and financing 2.2.2.9 São Paulo Metro 2.3.4.11 Shanghai Metro 1.1.8 Project delivery models 2.3.4.12 Shenzhen Metro 1.1.9 Key trends and developments 2.2.3 Chile 2.3.4.13 Suzhou Metro 2.2.3.1 Santiago Metro 2.3.4.14 Ürümqi Metro 1.2 Opportunities and Outlook 2.2.3.2 Valparaiso Metro 2.3.4.15 Wuhan Metro 1.2.1 Growth drivers 1.2.2 Network expansion by 2025 2.2.4 Colombia 2.3.5 India 1.2.3 Network expansion by 2030 2.2.4.1 Barranquilla Metro 2.3.5.1 Agra Metro 1.2.4 Network expansion beyond 2.2.4.2 Bogotá Metro 2.3.5.2 Ahmedabad-Gandhinagar Metro 2030 2.2.4.3 Medellín Metro 2.3.5.3 Bengaluru Metro 1.2.5 Rolling stock procurement and 2.3.5.4 Bhopal Metro refurbishment 2.2.5 Dominican Republic 2.3.5.5 Chennai Metro 1.2.6 Fare system upgrades and 2.2.5.1 Santo Domingo Metro 2.3.5.6 Hyderabad Metro Rail innovation 2.3.5.7 Jaipur Metro Rail 1.2.7 Signalling technology 2.2.6 Ecuador
    [Show full text]
  • Works on the Construction of Lima's Metro Line 2
    Works on the construction of Lima’s Metro Line 2 (Peru) RESULTS REPORT 3Q19 INDEX 1 Executive Summary 3 1.1 Main figures 3 1.2 Relevant facts 5 2 Consolidated Financial Statements 6 2.1 Income Statement 6 2.1.1 Sales and Backlog 7 2.1.2 Operating Results 9 2.1.3 Financial Results 9 2.1.4 Results from Associates 10 2.1.5 Net Profit Attributable 10 2.2 Consolidated Balance Sheet 11 2.2.1 Non-Current Assets 12 2.2.2 Working Capital 12 2.2.3 Net Worth 12 2.2.4 Net Debt 13 2.3 Net Cash Flows 13 2.3.1 Cash Flow from Operating Activities 13 2.3.2 Investments 14 2.3.3 Other Cash Flows 14 3 Evolution per Areas of Activity 15 3.1 Infrastructures 15 3.1.1. Construction 16 3.1.2 Concessions 18 3.2 Industrial Services 20 3.3 Services 22 4 Annex 23 4.1 Main figures per area of activity 23 4.2 Share data 24 4.3 Exchange Rate Effect 25 4.4 Main Awards 26 4.4.1 Infrastructure 26 4.4.2 Industrial Services 28 4.4.3 Services 28 5 ACS Group organizational structure 29 6 Glossary 30 2 RESULTS REPORT 3Q19 1 Executive Summary 1.1 Main figures Grupo ACS Key operating & financial figures Euro Million 9M18 9M19 Var. Turnover 27,091 28,800 +6.3% Backlog 70,329 77,584 +10.3% Months 22 24 EBITDA (1) 2,171 2,406 +10.8% Margin 8.0% 8.4% EBIT (1) 1,543 1,652 +7.0% Margin 5.7% 5.7% Attributable Net Profit 691 769 +11.2% EPS 2.22 € 2.50 € +12.4% Net Investments 214 1,271 n.a Investments 679 1,538 Disposals 465 266 Total Net (Debt)/Cash 128 (1,236) n.a Businesses' Net (Debt)/Cash 315 (1,121) Project Financing (187) (115) Data presented according to ACS Group management criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • La Calidad De Servicio De Transporte Urbano En El Tramo 2 De La Línea 1
    La calidad de servicio de transporte urbano en el tramo 2 de la línea 1 del metro de Lima y la seguridad de las pertenencias de los usuarios de Lima Metropolitana, 2015 Tesis para optar el grado académico de: Magister en gestión pública Autor: Ba. Segura Lezama, Genaro Marcial Asesor: Mgtr. Albarrán Gil, Jorge Luis Sección: Ciencias empresariales Línea de investigación: Administración del talento humano Perú-2017 ii _____________________________ Dr. Martínez López Edwin Presidente __________________________ Dra. Cadenillas Albornoz Secretario __________________________ Mgtr. Jorge Luis Albarrán Gil Vocal iii Dedicatoria: Este trabajo lo dedico a mis señores padres el Señor Leonardo Segura Andrade y la Señora María Lezama Briceño quienes formaron un sólido hogar familiar y se preocuparon de darme la educación y cultura desde mi niñez a mi juventud, ellos dieron forma y temple a mi forma de ser con espíritu de no doblegarse ante nadie y por nada, considerar y respetar a los demás como seres humanos como a mí mismo. iv Agradecimiento Quiero expresar mi agradecimiento al Dr. Cesar Acuña Peralta por la acertada idea de crear la Universidad Privada Cesar Vallejo Filial en el Distrito de San Juan de Lurigancho, con extensión la escuela de postgrado, que hizo posible estudiar el Postgrado de Magister en Gestión Pública. Mis más sincero y profundo agradecimiento a mis Asesores de Tesis, Dr. Albarrán Gil Jorge Luis, Dra. Cadenillas Albornoz Violeta. A los profesores que hicieron posible los conocimientos adquiridos. A los miembros del Jurado de examen de tesis que hicieron posible graduarme con el Grado Académico de Magister en Gestión Pública, Presidente Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    PROJECT INFORMATION DOCUMENT (PID) CONCEPT STAGE Report No.: PIDC11971 Public Disclosure Authorized Project Name PE - Lima Metro Line 2 Project (P145610) Region LATIN AMERICA AND CARIBBEAN Country Peru Public Disclosure Copy Sector(s) Urban Transport (100%) Theme(s) Infrastructure services for private sector development (10%), Municipal governance and institution building (10%), City-wide Infrast ructure and Service Delivery (80%) Lending Instrument Investment Project Financing Project ID P145610 Borrower(s) Ministry of Transport and Communications Public Disclosure Authorized Implementing Agency AATE, OSITRAN Environmental A-Full Assessment Category Date PID Prepared/ 21-Aug-2014 Updated Date PID Approved/ 04-Dec-2014 Disclosed Estimated Date of Appraisal Completion Estimated Date of 26-Mar-2015 Public Disclosure Authorized Board Approval Concept Review Track II - The review did authorize the preparation to continue Decision Public Disclosure Copy I. Introduction and Context Country Context Over the last decade, the Peruvian economy has experienced some of the most rapid growth in Latin America as evident from the annual GDP growth rate of 6.0% in 2012 and 5.8% in 2013. GDP per capita has tripled in the past 10 years, reaching approximately $6,660 in 2013 current US Dollars. In the same period, the external debt has declined substantially, reaching 29.4% of GNI in 2013, partially reflecting the stronger investment capacity of the Peruvian government. The Government of Peru (GoP) also has an ambitious development agenda to reduce poverty and boost productivity under a solid macroeconomic framework. The agenda includes programs to provide greater Public Disclosure Authorized accessibility to employment opportunities and basic services, mitigate social conflicts, and improve environmental protections.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Bonds in Latin America
    Project Bond Focus 2018 Latin America Project Bonds in Latin America Crédit Agricole CIB, a leader in the global Project Bond market, is authoring a series of articles covering key topics for issuers to consider. LatAm Project Bond Market Overview half of the year such as the $4BN Green Bond offering by Mexico City’s New International Airport. Latin America has been a consistent contributor to the On the other hand, market growth in 2017 was tempered global Project Bond market, with more than $50BN in by the slowdown in Brazil – historically, one of the issuances since 2010. Issuances for assets in Latin market’s largest contributors, due to political turmoil and America represent approximately 16% of global volumes restructuring. Project Bond volume from Brazil in 2017 between 2010 and 2017. dropped to $81MM, from $511MM in 2016 (i.e. an 84% drop). Latin America Project Bond Issuance Volumes (2010-2017, USD-equivalent billion) Latin America Project Bond Issuance Volume by Country (2010-2016 vs. 2017) 2010-2016 2017 Source: PFI, CA CIB Historically, the Latin American Project Bond market has been dominated by four countries: Mexico, Brazil, Peru, and Chile, which contributed 35%, 22%, 15%, and 10%, respectively, of total issuance volume between 2010 and 2016. These are the countries in the region that maintained their investment grade status the longest (with the exception of Brazil recently downgraded to sub- Source: PFI, CA CIB investment grade) and that contributed the most to the region’s total economic activity, in GDP terms. Sector-wise, the Latin American Project Bond market has been historically comprised of a majority of transportation In the past few years, other countries that had been under- infrastructure assets – with tollroads and airports as the represented in the Project Bond market have seen most significant contributors to issuance volume, followed increased activity.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: PAD1182 INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT ON A Public Disclosure Authorized PROPOSED LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF US$300 MILLION TO THE REPUBLIC OF PERU FOR A LIMA METRO LINE 2 PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized July 20, 2015 Transport and ICT Global Practice Latin America and the Caribbean Region Public Disclosure Authorized This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective July 16, 2015) Currency Unit = PERUVIAN NUEVOS SOLES PEN 3.18 = US$1 US$ 0.31 = PEN 1 FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AATE Autonomous Authority of Electric Mass Transit System of Lima and Callao AFD French Development Agency - Agence Française de Development BRT Bus Rapid Transit CAF Development Bank of Latin Amer. - Banco de Desarrollo de América Latina DGASA Directorate General on Socio-Environmental Matters of Ministry of Transport and Communications (Dirección General de Asuntos Socio-Ambientales) CPS Country Partnership Strategy DBOT Design-Build-Operate-Transfer EDI Definitive Engineering Studies - Estudios Definitivos de Ingeniería EIRR Economic Internal Rate of Return EIA Environmental Impact Assessment (including the Resettlement Policy Framework) ESMM Environmental and Social Management Manual FIRR Financial
    [Show full text]