DOCSLIB.ORG

Xenophon's Anabasis Y Book VI

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Xenophon's Anabasis Y Book VI. Ea'ìfcdfm fke Use of Schooh, with Nolcs, Infrductiom, and Vocabulbry by G. H. Nall, M.A. Assistant Master at Westminster School London a Macmillan and Co., Limited New York : Tbe Macmillan Company ' I 902 .. A ...G. PREFACE. THIS Volume, like my editions of Books III. and V. in the series, hm been prepared for eomewhatmore advanced students than those for whom the editions of Boob. I. and II. in the saries were intended. I have therefore provided it with B lengthy Intre j duction, reprintad .from my formereditions, mnch : of whichwould be unsuited for very young boys. I I haveendeavoured, at the erne time, to' make it a neeful book for comparative' beginners, by giving , a great deal of help in the. notes, and by a very full vbcabulary, which containe translations of many of the difficult phrases. I believe that the introductmy notes on the Amy, . .1 which are abundantly illustrated, will be interesting * and instructive to the youngeet boys : and that I g: i portions of the Life of Xenophon-selectedby the 7 Maeter-might be read with advantage by beginners. .msi "he section on the Works of Xenophon i~ of course intended for older bop. V vi PREFACE. PREFACE vii The text is Arnold Hug‘e, far the best text that editions of Vollbrecht and Rehdante. For the we poaaeea I have,however, altogether omitted . eketcheaof Military Manœuvres Í amresponsible, the word0 bracketed by him,and split up Hug‘s A but I have obtsined much help from Köchly and long paragraphs into ehort ones,less formidable to B;iistow’e t3rkhische Kldegsschriftsteller and Vollbrecht the beginner’s eye. The .Appendix contain0 a lid of mnd ILehdanta the more important variants, for the use of boys who 18 DEAN’SYARD, are likely to havein examination B different taxt, W~TY~TER,Junuavy, 1893. A full lie& of variante or B critical diecumionof them would have hen quite ’ out of place in such m edition In preparing the book I have consultedthe English editiona of Pretor, and OF Macmichael and Melhuieh : the German editiona of Poppo, Krüger, Kühner, Voll- brecht and Rehdantz:the recently publihed Eng- li& translation of Dakyna (to which is prefixeda moat inkmuting and eympathetic aketchof Xeno- phon’e life;‘ to thia I am largely indebted in the mction on the life of Xenophon) ; the geographical writinga of Ainsworth, Hamilton, Kinn& ; Eiepert’e MBsuel ofhoient Geography, Köchly and Riietow’a (2mchwh.. K&gsschr@&dh, Grote’e and Thirlwall’e Ristoriq Mddy‘e Greek Literature, Jevon’s Greek Literature, Rotherford’s Nm Pwhu, and many other worke, both Englieh and Clerman. OceaeionaI referenm e given to Mr. Rutherford’e Fwd && @&x (a‘ R. .Sp”),B new work wbioh ie rapidly making ite way into um among our echoole. The illuetratione of armour taken from the 1 .p’ CONTENTS. .h”EODUUI’ION+ PMI hALYEIS OF ANABASIS, - - I - - d L~EOF XENOPHON, - . - - xv WOBKSOF XENOPHON,- - - - - - ‘xmi ‘ NOTEEON THE &WEE MEFLCENABIESOF CYRUS AND SOME MANIXWBIWOF THE AR~Y. - mv lvi 1Vi -.-l 11” 36 .-..71 -- ” 124 --- 128 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Map-March of the l'en Thoumud Ureeke, - Fme si Formatiom and Manœuvre%, - - - - di-xliv Greek Arme, etc., - - - - - - xli~-liii WhomArming (from a Vane et Vienne), -\ WER^^ teking e Fsrewell Drink (from a Fane at Vienna), - - - - - - - Soldier with Mnchsire or &pis (from a Verre et. _. Neple~), - - - - - - - Scythien Archer, - - - - - - Pelht? - . - - - - - - Throwing the Javelin (from e Vane in the Britiih -page 1 ... Mumum), - . - - - - - I Greek Homeman (Coin of Magneah), - - - Victory an a Prow, blowing the Sslpinx (Coin of DemetriusPoliorcetea), - - - - - Persian Soldier (from e Vsae at Neplee), - - PedSoldier with Spear and Akinskee, - - Pemim Deric, with figure of the King of Persia (Coinof Artexemen), - - - - - Persien Aroher (hm e Vane in the Britkh Muneam), - - - - - - 3, 8 E3echrn Coin of Cyeicus (I(uftqv&),- - - PyrrhicDance, - - - - - - -1- ..................... ..... Portreitof PhSmah, - - - - m poBe 34 1 ... ANALYSIS OF THE ANABASIS. THE work is divided in its present form into sevenbooks. Of these, the first only describes the ' Anabasis ' proper, i.e. the ' March up-country' against Bd)ylon. The sccond con- tains an account of the rnoven1ent.s of thc Creek arlny from the bottle of Cunaxa to the seizure of the generals : the third md fourth books continne the rctreut along the Tigris, ovcr the highlmds of Aummnis, to Trapems on the Euxine : the three lest books are devoted to the subsequent adveutnrcs of the army util itwu finally incorporlrtctl in the force, wllich the L&ccdaemonianswcre collecting against Tissnphcrnes. (Book l.) On thc cie:rtll of Durius Nothus (405 B.c.), Ar- taxerxes succecdctl to the throne : Lut his ljrother, Cyrus, diseppoilltcd of the succession, and indignant at the treatment he had suffered from him, conspired %g&& him. He secretly collected ib Iwgc native foroc of 100,000 n~cnold bodies Ijf Greek nlerccnarics wl~ichamoluntetl iu all to over 10,000 men, and marching through Asia Minor (401 KC.), crosscd tllc Euphrates at Thapsacus, and dvanced without oppoeition uponBabylon. Near here, at Cu,*he was suddenly attacked by the Persian army under the conmand of Arte- xerxea himself. The Greeks, 011 the right wing, were com- pletely victorious, but Cyrus, rashly exposing himself, was * The name is not given by Xenophon but comaa from Plutarch. xi ANALYSIS OF ANABABIS. xiii ,, d bxenua : e phof eotion wan mttled : negotiations with the tresoherons enemy were broken off: end the my, no dejected and diaorgmhd, but full of the spirit ed ddenceof their yonng perd, detarmine to cut a way for +mlvem back to Greece, or periah in the attempt. The rehit in continued : they cmsa the &pst&, fobwd md hemmad by Mithredetes, paca through the darted citien of krieas and Meepila, and edven~eup the east bank of the Tigrie till they confronted by the lofty mountain ehein of the cprduchi (KWdiah).. .. (BoaL b.) After holding (L council of,A, the Ureh decide to continue their merah in a northerly direotion. They mtm the territory,of the Carduchi, for aeven dap fight aad through thi~inhospitable land, and then, oragahg the Centritea River in the face of the enemy, lret foot in Armenia. It waa now December, and the amy =-ona high md eapoaed tableland. Hmvy feile of mow delayed their .+pas: cold winde ,numbed them, and p~hi~~failed. & laat, efter WOES@ the aource~of the Tigrjs, and the Wh,they reached the Phnaia (kea),fought their way hghthe Chalyh, Teochi, and pheaiene, crossed the &ver Herpaaus, and, advencing through the territory of the &ytheni, dedthe town of Gymuiaa On the íIfth day hhare, they caught sight of the Enrine from the Buramit J-!Mount Theches. Paeeing on unmolested hugh the &pm, they entered colchie, end mon afterwar& reached (Trebhnd), a Greek town on the Eurine. Here hardeat part of their journey waa over : end they offered ad sdcea to Zeue the Preserver. Heraclea the , and other goda. (Feb.-March, 400 B.O.) v.) Wemryof marching, the Ureeks determined to @e the reat of their journey home by m, ‘like Odyesem’ of & Cheirieophur went to Bymtium to obtain kanePorts, ---l b0L he did not return, and proviaions grew amma: 80 eend- xiv INTRODUCTION. ing their women, their sick, and their baggage in U few ships, which they had collected, they marched themselvert by land to CGrSsus. Here they werereviewed, ancl still numbered 8600 hoplites. From Cerasus, they advanced through hostile territory to Cotyom, where they stayed forty-five days, living LIFE OF XENOPHON. by plundering the neighbouring tribes, since the inhabitants refused provisions. SUMMARY. (Book vi.) Sufficient ships were et last collected to convey na B. C. the army to Sinope. Hcre they were hospihbly received, ?al.Birth. 394. B. of Coronea Disciplc end friend of So- Life at Sparta. nnd here thcy met Cheirisophus, who returned with empty crates. ? 387. Bent as colonist to Scillun. hands and only a single triremc. After five days' rest, they 401. Joins Cyreian Expedition. ?WO.Driven from Soillus. proceedcd to Heraclea, ond thence to Calpe,where Cheiri- 399. End of Expedition. Retires to Corinth. In Asia with Thibron. Banishment withdrawn. sophusdied. From Calpe they marched through Bitllynia, Marriage.Banishment. 362. B. of Mentinea: death of plnntlering the country, to Chrysnpolis, opposite Byzantium, 396. Agesilaus in Asia. Gryllus. 394. %turns to Sparta with where they spent seven days in selling their booty. dgesilaus. (Book Mi.) Annxihius, the Spartan admiral, urged on by the satrap Phamabmus, who was eager to renmve the Greeka XENOPHOX was probably bon1 about the year 431 B.c.,* the from his province, now invitcd th army to Byzantium. first year of the Peloponnesian War. He was They accepted his promises of pay and crossed orer, but an Athenian of the deme or borough of Erchia, 7 691Birth. B.c. finding that they were again deceived, and were IIOW told to the son of Gryllus, and perhaps of IXodora. march to thc Throcian Chersoncse, where Cyniscus wouldfiud About the position of his family, his boyhood and his youth thcm pay, they forced en entrance into thc city, and were next to nothing is known. Tradition mys that hewas only restrained from plundering it by the influence of sufficiently ricl1 to serve as A knight in the Athenian army; Xenophnn,who felt that such an act wouldprovoke the he seems to have joined the Expedition of Cyrus in search indignation of all Greece. After some delay, they lent their of fame rather than wealth ; and in after life he had all the services to thc Thracian princc, Seuthm; but he too, after tastes of a counhy gentleman, the foundations of which were obtaining his ends, proved faithless, and neglected to provide probably laid in his boyhood.
Recommended publications
  • Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics

    Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics

    Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics The eighth-century revolution Version 1.0 December 2005 Ian Morris Stanford University Abstract: Through most of the 20th century classicists saw the 8th century BC as a period of major changes, which they characterized as “revolutionary,” but in the 1990s critics proposed more gradualist interpretations. In this paper I argue that while 30 years of fieldwork and new analyses inevitably require us to modify the framework established by Snodgrass in the 1970s (a profound social and economic depression in the Aegean c. 1100-800 BC; major population growth in the 8th century; social and cultural transformations that established the parameters of classical society), it nevertheless remains the most convincing interpretation of the evidence, and that the idea of an 8th-century revolution remains useful © Ian Morris. [email protected] 1 THE EIGHTH-CENTURY REVOLUTION Ian Morris Introduction In the eighth century BC the communities of central Aegean Greece (see figure 1) and their colonies overseas laid the foundations of the economic, social, and cultural framework that constrained and enabled Greek achievements for the next five hundred years. Rapid population growth promoted warfare, trade, and political centralization all around the Mediterranean. In most regions, the outcome was a concentration of power in the hands of kings, but Aegean Greeks created a new form of identity, the equal male citizen, living freely within a small polis. This vision of the good society was intensely contested throughout the late eighth century, but by the end of the archaic period it had defeated all rival models in the central Aegean, and was spreading through other Greek communities.
  • Alexander's Battles with Darius III

    Alexander's Battles with Darius III

    Historical Site of Mirhadi Hoseini http://m-hosseini.ir ……………………………………………………………………………………… Anabasis Alexander's Battles with Darius III By Arrian Translated by E. J. Chinnock Book 1, 11- 16 The Battle of Granicus At the beginning of the spring he marched towards the Hellespont, entrusting the affairs of Macedonia and Greece to Antipater. He led with him not much over 30,000 infantry together with light-armed troops and archers, and more than 5,000 cavalry. His march was past the lake Cercinitis, towards Amphipolis and the mouths of the river Strymon. Having crossed this river he passed by the Pangaean mountain, along the road leading to Abdera and Maronea, Grecian cities built on the coast. Thence he arrived at the river Hebrus, and easily crossed it. Thence he proceeded through Paetica to the river Melas, having crossed which he arrived at Sestus, in twenty days altogether from the time of his starting from home. When he came to Elaeus he offered sac rifice to Protesilaus upon the tomb of that hero, both for other reasons and because Protesilaus seemed to have been the first of the Greeks who took part with Agamemnon in the expedition to Ilium to disembark in Asia. The design of this sacrifice was that disembarking in Asia might be more fortunate to himself than that it had been to Protesilaus. He then committed to Parmenio the duty of conveying the cavalry and the greater part of the infantry across from Sestus to Abydus; and they crossed over in 160 triremes, besides many trading vessels. The prevailing account is that Alexander started from Elaeus and put into the Port of Achaeans, that with his own hand he steered the general's ship across, and that when he was about the middle of the channel of the Hellespont he sacrificed a bull to Poseidon and the Nereids, and poured forth a libation to them into the sea from a golden goblet.
  • Keeping Tradition Alive: Just War and Historical Imagination Cian O’Driscoll

    Keeping Tradition Alive: Just War and Historical Imagination Cian O’Driscoll

    Journal of Global Security Studies, 3(2), 2018, 234–247 doi: 10.1093/jogss/ogy003 Research Article Keeping Tradition Alive: Just War and Historical Imagination Cian O’Driscoll University of Glasgow Abstract The just war tradition is one of the key constituencies of international political theory, and its vocab- ulary plays a prominent role in how political and military leaders frame contemporary conflicts. Yet, it stands in danger of turning in on itself and becoming irrelevant. This article argues that scholars who wish to preserve the vitality of this tradition must think in a more open-textured fashion about its historiography. One way to achieve this is to problematize the boundaries of the tradition. This article pursues this objective by treating one figure that stands in a liminal relation to the just war tradition. Despite having a lot to say about the ethics of war, Xenophon is seldom acknowledged as a bona fide just war thinker. The analysis presented here suggests, however, that his writings have much to tell us, not only about how he and his contemporaries thought about the ethics of war, but about how just war thinking is understood (and delimited) today and how it might be revived as a pluralistic critical enterprise. Keywords: just war, ancient Greece, Xenophon, historiography, changing character of war “The past is a different country, they do things differ- its totality, as a rolling story, rather than as an index of ently there.” discrete individuated contributions (Johnson 2009, 252). L. P. Hartley Proponents of this
  • The Outbreak of the Rebellion of Cyrus the Younger Jeffrey Rop

    The Outbreak of the Rebellion of Cyrus the Younger Jeffrey Rop

    The Outbreak of the Rebellion of Cyrus the Younger Jeffrey Rop N THE ANABASIS, Xenophon asserts that the Persian prince Cyrus the Younger was falsely accused of plotting a coup I d’état against King Artaxerxes II shortly after his accession to the throne in 404 BCE. Spared from execution by the Queen Mother Parysatis, Cyrus returned to Lydia determined to seize the throne for himself. He secretly prepared his rebellion by securing access to thousands of Greek hoplites, winning over Persian officials and most of the Greek cities of Ionia, and continuing to send tribute and assurances of his loyalty to the unsuspecting King (1.1).1 In Xenophon’s timeline, the rebellion was not official until sometime between the muster of his army at Sardis in spring 401, which spurred his rival Tissaphernes to warn Artaxerxes (1.2.4–5), and his arrival several months later at Thapsacus on the Euphrates, where Cyrus first openly an- nounced his true intentions (1.4.11). Questioning the “strange blindness” of Artaxerxes in light of Cyrus’ seemingly obvious preparations for revolt, Pierre Briant proposed an alternative timeline placing the outbreak of the rebellion almost immediately after Cyrus’ return to Sardis in late 404 or early 403.2 In his reconstruction, the King allowed Cyrus 1 See also Ctesias FGrHist 688 F 16.59, Diod. 14.19, Plut. Artax. 3–4. 2 Pierre Briant, From Cyrus to Alexander (Winona Lake 2002) 617–620. J. K. Anderson, Xenophon (New York 1974) 80, expresses a similar skepticism. Briant concludes his discussion by stating that the rebellion officially (Briant does not define “official,” but I take it to mean when either the King or Cyrus declared it publicly) began in 401 with the muster of Cyrus’ army at Sardis, but it is nonetheless appropriate to characterize Briant’s position as dating the official outbreak of the revolt to 404/3.
  • Early Mycenaean Arkadia: Space and Place(S) of an Inland and Mountainous Region

    Early Mycenaean Arkadia: Space and Place(S) of an Inland and Mountainous Region

    Early Mycenaean Arkadia: Space and Place(s) of an Inland and Mountainous Region Eleni Salavoura1 Abstract: The concept of space is an abstract and sometimes a conventional term, but places – where people dwell, (inter)act and gain experiences – contribute decisively to the formation of the main characteristics and the identity of its residents. Arkadia, in the heart of the Peloponnese, is a landlocked country with small valleys and basins surrounded by high mountains, which, according to the ancient literature, offered to its inhabitants a hard and laborious life. Its rough terrain made Arkadia always a less attractive area for archaeological investigation. However, due to its position in the centre of the Peloponnese, Arkadia is an inevitable passage for anyone moving along or across the peninsula. The long life of small and medium-sized agrarian communities undoubtedly owes more to their foundation at crossroads connecting the inland with the Peloponnesian coast, than to their potential for economic growth based on the resources of the land. However, sites such as Analipsis, on its east-southeastern borders, the cemetery at Palaiokastro and the ash altar on Mount Lykaion, both in the southwest part of Arkadia, indicate that the area had a Bronze Age past, and raise many new questions. In this paper, I discuss the role of Arkadia in early Mycenaean times based on settlement patterns and excavation data, and I investigate the relation of these inland communities with high-ranking central places. In other words, this is an attempt to set place(s) into space, supporting the idea that the central region of the Peloponnese was a separated, but not isolated part of it, comprising regions that are also diversified among themselves.
  • Herodotus, Xerxes and the Persian Wars IAN PLANT, DEPARTMENT of ANCIENT HISTORY

    Herodotus, Xerxes and the Persian Wars IAN PLANT, DEPARTMENT of ANCIENT HISTORY

    Herodotus, Xerxes and the Persian Wars IAN PLANT, DEPARTMENT OF ANCIENT HISTORY Xerxes: Xerxes’ tomb at Naqsh-i-Rustam Herodotus: 2nd century AD: found in Egypt. A Roman copy of a Greek original from the first half of the 4th century BC. Met. Museum New York 91.8 History looking at the evidence • Our understanding of the past filtered through our present • What happened? • Why did it happen? • How can we know? • Key focus is on information • Critical collection of information (what is relevant?) • Critical evaluation of information (what is reliable?) • Critical questioning of information (what questions need to be asked?) • These are essential transferable skills in the Information Age • Let’s look at some examples from Herodotus’ history of the Persian invasion of Greece in 480 BC • Is the evidence from: ― Primary sources: original sources; close to origin of information. ― Secondary sources: sources which cite, comment on or build upon primary sources. ― Tertiary source: cites only secondary sources; does not look at primary sources. • Is it the evidence : ― Reliable; relevant ― Have I analysed it critically? Herodotus: the problem… Succession of Xerxes 7.3 While Darius delayed making his decision [about his successor], it chanced that at this time Demaratus son of Ariston had come up to Susa, in voluntary exile from Lacedaemonia after he had lost the kingship of Sparta. [2] Learning of the contention between the sons of Darius, this man, as the story goes, came and advised Xerxes to add this to what he said: that he had been born when Darius was already king and ruler of Persia, but Artobazanes when Darius was yet a subject; [3] therefore it was neither reasonable nor just that anyone should have the royal privilege before him.
  • Archaic Eretria

    Archaic Eretria

    ARCHAIC ERETRIA This book presents for the first time a history of Eretria during the Archaic Era, the city’s most notable period of political importance. Keith Walker examines all the major elements of the city’s success. One of the key factors explored is Eretria’s role as a pioneer coloniser in both the Levant and the West— its early Aegean ‘island empire’ anticipates that of Athens by more than a century, and Eretrian shipping and trade was similarly widespread. We are shown how the strength of the navy conferred thalassocratic status on the city between 506 and 490 BC, and that the importance of its rowers (Eretria means ‘the rowing city’) probably explains the appearance of its democratic constitution. Walker dates this to the last decade of the sixth century; given the presence of Athenian political exiles there, this may well have provided a model for the later reforms of Kleisthenes in Athens. Eretria’s major, indeed dominant, role in the events of central Greece in the last half of the sixth century, and in the events of the Ionian Revolt to 490, is clearly demonstrated, and the tyranny of Diagoras (c. 538–509), perhaps the golden age of the city, is fully examined. Full documentation of literary, epigraphic and archaeological sources (most of which have previously been inaccessible to an English-speaking audience) is provided, creating a fascinating history and a valuable resource for the Greek historian. Keith Walker is a Research Associate in the Department of Classics, History and Religion at the University of New England, Armidale, Australia.
  • Monuments, Materiality, and Meaning in the Classical Archaeology of Anatolia

    Monuments, Materiality, and Meaning in the Classical Archaeology of Anatolia

    MONUMENTS, MATERIALITY, AND MEANING IN THE CLASSICAL ARCHAEOLOGY OF ANATOLIA by Daniel David Shoup A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Classical Art and Archaeology) in The University of Michigan 2008 Doctoral Committee: Professor Elaine K. Gazda, Co-Chair Professor John F. Cherry, Co-Chair, Brown University Professor Fatma Müge Göçek Professor Christopher John Ratté Professor Norman Yoffee Acknowledgments Athena may have sprung from Zeus’ brow alone, but dissertations never have a solitary birth: especially this one, which is largely made up of the voices of others. I have been fortunate to have the support of many friends, colleagues, and mentors, whose ideas and suggestions have fundamentally shaped this work. I would also like to thank the dozens of people who agreed to be interviewed, whose ideas and voices animate this text and the sites where they work. I offer this dissertation in hope that it contributes, in some small way, to a bright future for archaeology in Turkey. My committee members have been unstinting in their support of what has proved to be an unconventional project. John Cherry’s able teaching and broad perspective on archaeology formed the matrix in which the ideas for this dissertation grew; Elaine Gazda’s support, guidance, and advocacy of the project was indispensible to its completion. Norman Yoffee provided ideas and support from the first draft of a very different prospectus – including very necessary encouragement to go out on a limb. Chris Ratté has been a generous host at the site of Aphrodisias and helpful commentator during the writing process.
  • 1-And-2 Kings

    1-And-2 Kings

    FROM DAVID TO EXILE 1 & 2 Kings by Daniel J. Lewis © copyright 2009 by Diakonos, Inc. Troy, Michigan United States of America 2 Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 4 Composition and Authorship ...................................................................................................................... 5 Structure ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 Theological Motifs ..................................................................................................................................... 7 The Kingship of Solomon (1 Kings 1-11) .....................................................................................................13 Solomon Succeeds David as King (1:1—2:12) .........................................................................................13 The Purge (2:13-46) ..................................................................................................................................16 Solomon‟s Wisdom (3-4) ..........................................................................................................................17 Building the Temple and the Palace (5-7) .................................................................................................20 The Dedication of the Temple (8) .............................................................................................................26
  • Notes and Inscriptions from South-Western Messenia Author(S): Marcus Niebuhr Tod Source: the Journal of Hellenic Studies, Vol

    Notes and Inscriptions from South-Western Messenia Author(S): Marcus Niebuhr Tod Source: the Journal of Hellenic Studies, Vol

    Notes and Inscriptions from South-Western Messenia Author(s): Marcus Niebuhr Tod Source: The Journal of Hellenic Studies, Vol. 25 (1905), pp. 32-55 Published by: The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/624207 . Accessed: 14/06/2014 14:24 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Hellenic Studies. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 130.239.116.185 on Sat, 14 Jun 2014 14:24:24 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions NOTES AND INSCRIPTIONS FROM SOUTH-WESTERN MESSENIA. I.-Introduction. THE following notes and inscriptions represent part of the results of a journey made in the spring of 1904, supplemented and revised on a second visit paid to the same district in the following November. One iuscription from Korone, a fragment of the 'Edictum Diocletiani,' I have already published (J.H.S. 1904, p. 195 foll.). I have attempted to state as briefly as possible the fresh topographical evidence collected on my tour, avoiding as far as possible any mere repetition of the descriptions and discussions of previous writers.
  • 09. Ch. 6 Huitink-Rood

    09. Ch. 6 Huitink-Rood

    Histos Supplement ( ) – SUBORDINATE OFFICERS IN XENOPHON’S ANABASIS * Luuk Huitink and Tim Rood Abstract : This chapter focuses on Xenophon’s treatment of divisions within the command structure presented in the Anabasis , and in particular on three military positions that are briefly mentioned—the taxiarch, ὑποστράτηγος , and ὑπολόχαγος . Arguing against the prescriptive military hierarchies proposed in earlier scholarship, it suggests that ‘taxiarch’ should be understood fluidly and that the appearance of both the ὑποστράτηγος and the ὑπολόχαγος may be due to interpolation. The chapter also includes discussion of two types of comparative material: procedures for replacing dead, absent, or deposed generals at Athens and Sparta in the Classical period, and the lexical development of subordinate positions with the prefix ὑπο -. Keywords : Xenophon, Anabasis , subordinate commanders, taxiarch, ὑποστράτηγος , ὑπολόχαγος . enophon’s Anabasis has more often been broadly eulogised for its supposed depiction of the X democratic spirit of the Greek mercenaries whose adventures are recounted than analysed closely for the details it o?ers about the command structure of this ‘wandering republic’. 1 When Xenophon’s presentation of * References are to Xenophon’s Anabasis unless otherwise specified. Translations are adapted from the Loeb edition of Brownson and Dillery. We are grateful to Peter Rhodes for advice and to Simon Hornblower, Nick Stylianou, David Thomas, the editor, and the anonymous referee of Histos for comments on the whole article. Luuk Huitink’s work on this paper was made possible by ERC Grant Agreement n. B B (AncNar). 1 Krüger (E ) (‘civitatem peregrinantem’). On the command structure see Nussbaum (F) ‒E; Roy (F) EF‒; Lee ( F) ‒ , ‒ .
  • Notes on Strabo

    Notes on Strabo

    The Classical Quarterly http://journals.cambridge.org/CAQ Additional services for The Classical Quarterly: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here Notes on Strabo Horace L. Jones The Classical Quarterly / Volume 11 / Issue 03 / July 1917, pp 132 - 134 DOI: 10.1017/S0009838800011034, Published online: 11 February 2009 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0009838800011034 How to cite this article: Horace L. Jones (1917). Notes on Strabo. The Classical Quarterly, 11, pp 132-134 doi:10.1017/S0009838800011034 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/CAQ, IP address: 138.251.14.35 on 16 Apr 2015 NOTES ON STRABO. I. THE MEANING OF fj,ovoTpo<f>ea> (STRABO 3. 3. 6). THE word fiovorpo^io) is apparently an aira^ Xeyofievov, being cited by the dictionaries only for Strabo 3. 3. 6 : eviov; he ra>v trpoaoiKovvTaiv T(j> Aovpltp •jrorafio) Aa,K(ovcicoi)<; htdyeiv (pa&iv, d\enrTr)pi,oi<; xpa/ievov; hl<> ical irvplcu<; iic ~Kid<ov hiairvpwv, yjrv)£p6\ovTpovvTa<; icai /Movorpo<f>ovvTa<i Ka8apel(0<; ical \«TG)9. Stephanus' Thesaurus (Liddell and Scott) and Sophocles give only one meaning: ' to eat but one kind of food.' Madvig, whom A. Vogel follows, emended to Ko/j.orpo<povvra<;, obviously being led to do so, in part, because he took fiovorpo^>ovvTa<i in the meaning cited above. In 3- 3- 7 Strabo specifically asserts that the mountaineers—and this includes Lusitanians—eat goat-meat, bread made of acorn-flour, and butter; and that while water is their beverage, they also drink wine and beer.