DOCSLIB.ORG

2006 Cohes Annex En.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2006 Cohes Annex En.Pdf EN EN EN REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION Annual report on the Cohesion Fund (2006) EN 1 EN COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Annex to the: ANNUAL REPORT ON THE COHESION FUND (2006) COM (2007) XXX EN 2 EN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. General Context............................................................................................................. 1.1. Convergence and economic development in the beneficiary countries......................... 1.1.1 Greece ............................................................................................................................ 1.1.2. Spain............................................................................................................................... 1.1.3. Portugal .......................................................................................................................... 1.1.4. Cyprus ............................................................................................................................ 1.1.5. Czech Republic.............................................................................................................. 1.1.6. Estonia............................................................................................................................ 1.1.7. Hungary.......................................................................................................................... 1.1.8. Latvia.............................................................................................................................. 1.1.9. Lithuania ........................................................................................................................ 1.1.10. Malta .............................................................................................................................. 1.1.11. Poland............................................................................................................................. 1.1.12. Slovakia.......................................................................................................................... 1.1.13. Slovenia.......................................................................................................................... 1.2. Conditionality................................................................................................................. 2. Implementing Principles and Assistance Granted.......................................................... 2.1. Coordination with other Community policies................................................................ 2.1.1. Competition.................................................................................................................... 2.1.2. Environment................................................................................................................... 2.1.3. Transport ........................................................................................................................ 2.1.4. Public procurement……………………………………………………………………. 2.2. Coordination with the Structural Funds: the strategic reference frameworks (SRF)..... 2.2.1. Environment................................................................................................................... 2.2.2. Transport ........................................................................................................................ 2.3. Implementation of the budget, commitments and payments and overview of the period 2000-2006 ........................................................................................................... 2.3.1. Budget available for 2006 .............................................................................................. 2.3.2. Implementation of the 2006 budget ............................................................................... 2.3.3. Overview of the 2000-2006 period (including RAL) .................................................... EN 3 EN 2.3.4. Implementation of the budget for the 1993-1999 period ............................................... 3. The projects and measures adopted................................................................................ 3.1. Assistance from the Fund by Member State .................................................................. 3.1.1. Greece ............................................................................................................................ 3.1.1.1 Environment................................................................................................................... 3.1.1.2 Transport ........................................................................................................................ 3.1.2. Spain............................................................................................................................... 3.1.2.1 Environment................................................................................................................... 3.1.2.2 Transport ........................................................................................................................ 3.1.3. Portugal .......................................................................................................................... 3.1.3.1. Environment................................................................................................................... 3.1.3.2. Transport ........................................................................................................................ 3.1.4. Cyprus ............................................................................................................................ 3.1.4.1. Environment................................................................................................................... 3.1.4.2. Transport ........................................................................................................................ 3.1.5. Czech Republic.............................................................................................................. 3.1.5.1. Environment................................................................................................................... 3.1.5.2. Transport ........................................................................................................................ 3.1.6. Estonia............................................................................................................................ 3.1.6.1. Environment................................................................................................................... 3.1.6.2. Transport ........................................................................................................................ 3.1.7. Hungary.......................................................................................................................... 3.1.7.1. Environment................................................................................................................... 3.1.7.2. Transport ........................................................................................................................ 3.1.8. Latvia.............................................................................................................................. 3.1.8.1. Environment................................................................................................................... 3.1.8.2. Transport ........................................................................................................................ 3.1.9. Lithuania ........................................................................................................................ 3.1.9.1. Environment................................................................................................................... 3.1.9.2. Transport ........................................................................................................................ 3.1.10. Malta .............................................................................................................................. EN 4 EN 3.1.10.1. Environment................................................................................................................... 3.1.10.2. Transport ........................................................................................................................ 3.1.11. Poland............................................................................................................................. 3.1.11.1. Environment................................................................................................................... 3.1.11.2. Transport ........................................................................................................................ 3.1.12. Slovakia.......................................................................................................................... 3.1.12.1. Environment................................................................................................................... 3.1.12.2. Transport ........................................................................................................................ 3.1.13. Slovenia.......................................................................................................................... 3.1.13.1. Environment................................................................................................................... 3.1.13.2. Transport
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mediterranean Corridor Work Plan
    Mediterranean Work Plan of the European Coordinator Laurens Jan Brinkhorst Transport MAY 2015 This report represents the opinion of the European Coordinator and does not prejudice the official position of the European Commission. 1. Towards the Mediterranean Corridor work plan On 1 January 2014 a new era has begun in European infrastructure policy with the setting up of nine core network corridors led by a European coordinator and the creation of the Connecting Europe Facility as financing instrument. This new framework includes not only the Member States but also all other stakeholders of the Corridor: infrastructure managers (for road, rail, ports, inland waterways, airports and multi-modal terminals), regions and representatives of the transport industry as users of the infrastructure. All these stakeholders come together in the Corridor Forum: four meetings of the Corridor Forum have been held in 2014 and have functioned as unique platform allowing a transparent and constantly deepening dialogue. Furthermore, the Corridor Forum served as the “testing ground” of many of the findings and recommendations presented in this document. This work plan is largely based on the study of the Mediterranean corridor (the Corridor Study) carried out in 2014. It is presented as the result of the collaborative efforts of the Member States, the European Commission, external consultants and chaired by the European Coordinator. The work plan has been elaborated in accordance with the provisions of Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 which establishes Union guidelines for the development of the trans- European transport network (the Regulation)1. The concept of core network corridors rests on three pillars: modal integration, interoperability and the coordinated development of its infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brochure Visit Adriatic Museums: from Italy to the Balkans
    Visit Adriatic Museums from Italy to the Balkans Visit Adriatic Museums from Italy to the Balkans This document has been produced with the financial assistance the museumcultour project 04 of the IPA Adriatic Cross-Border Cooperation Programme. The project partners 05 contents of this document are the sole responsibility of DELTA the adriatic photo exhibition 08 2000 soc. Cons a .rl. under no circumstances be regarded museums’ network 11 as reflecting the position of the IPA Adriatic Cross-Border italy Cooperation Programme Authorities. museo del mare di san benedetto del tronto 13 Pubblication realized by DELTA 2000, Consortium Company with limited liability, musei della cartiera papale di ascoli piceno 18 Ostellato (ITALY) www.deltaduemila.net museo natura di sant’alberto 25 In cooperation with: ecomuseo di argenta 30 Ecomuseo di Argenta (FE - ITALY) www.vallidiargenta.org manifattura dei marinati comacchio 35 Manifattura dei Marinati, Comacchio (FE - ITALY) www.aqua-deltadelpo.com museo del territorio di ostellato 40 Musei della Cartiera Papale di Ascoli Piceno (AP - ITALY) www.museicartierapapale.it Museo del Cervo e del Bosco della Mesola, Mesola (FE - ITALY) www.prolocomesola.it museo del cervo e del bosco della mesola 45 Museo del Mare di San Benedetto del Tronto (AP - ITALY) www.museodelmaresbt.it slovenia Museo del Territorio di Ostellato (FE - ITALY) www.atlantide.net Museo NatuRa, Sant’Alberto (RA - ITALY) www.atlantide.net notranjski muzej postojna 51 Muzeumet Berat (ALBANIA) www.muzeumet-berat.al postojnska jama cave-grotte-höhle
    [Show full text]
  • Documents.Worldbank.Org
    46730 THE WORLD BANK GROUP WASHINGTON, D.C. TP-23 TRANSPORT PAPERS NOVEMBER 2008 Public Disclosure Authorized Road User Charges: Current Practice and Perspectives in Central and Eastern Europe Cesar Queiroz, Barbara Rdzanowska, Robert Garbarczyk and Michel Audige Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized TRANSPORT SECTOR BOARD ROAD USER CHARGES: CURRENT PRACTICE AND PERSPECTIVES IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE Cesar Queiroz, Barbara Rdzanowska, Robert Garbarczyk and Michel Audige THE WORLD BANK WASHINGTON, D.C. © 2008 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington, DC 20433 Telephone 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org This volume is a product of the staff of The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA; telephone: 978-750-8400; fax: 978-750-4470; Internet: www.copyright.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report 24.04.2020
    DAILY REPORT 24.04.2020. DAILY REPORT 24.04.2020. Reporting time: 13.30 h S ERBIA HORGOŠ: • Entry to Serbia; waiting time 1-2 hours, 30 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 30 minutes, 4 trucks in the waiting line. KELEBIA • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 20 minutes. • Exit from Serbia: no delays. TOVARNIK-ŠID • Entry to Serbia:.no delays. • Exit from Serbia: no delays. • On Tovarnik-Šid border crossing, the goods coming from Croatia can enter only if export customs clearance was done in Croatia. The goods going to Croatia for unloading should undergo customs clearance in Croatia. BATROVCI • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 1-2 hours, 1-2 km long waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: no delays. PREŠEVO BORDER CROSSING • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 1-2 hours, 20 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: no delays. GRADINA • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 30 minutes, 2-3 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: no delays. VATIN • Entry to Serbia: no delays. • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 10 minutes (1 truck). As of April 6th, there will be no transit traffic towards Romania through border crossings Srpska Crnja and Đerdap. The trucks from Serbia that are transiting through Romania can use Vatin border crossing. DAILY REPORT 24.04.2020. B OSN I A AND HERZEGO VINA Gradiška: • 30 trucks waiting on BiH exit. • There is a waiting line at the Croatian checkpoint on BiH entry, waiting time 5 hours. • There are a lot of vehicles at the customs terminal Gardiška.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning and Valorization of the Branch Xa of Corridor X from The
    151 Scientific Journal of Maritime Research 30 (2016) 151-159 © Faculty of Maritime Studies Rijeka, 2016 Multidisciplinary Multidisciplinarni SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF znanstveni časopis MARITIME RESEARCH POMORSTVO Planning and valorization of the branch Xa of Corridor X from the aspects of external costs Luka Vukić, Tanja Poletan Jugović University of Rijeka, Faculty of Maritime Studies Rijeka, Studentska 2, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia, e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT ARTICLE INFO Branch Xa of Pan-European Transport Corridor X has a strategic importance for Croatia since this Preliminary communication corridor (Corridor branch) enables linking of Croatia with Slovenia and Austria, which, according Received 17 October 2016 to the current data on the structure of trade in goods from countries, is counted among five most KeyAccepted words: 5 December 2016 important Croatian trading partners. Therefore, the valorization of the branch of Corridor X has unquestionable importance for the Croatian economy and the associated surroundings that gravitate in the transport route. Conditional on the numerous geo-transport and socioeconomic factors, Branch Xa the valorization of transport corridor on the transport market is determined also by the value of Goods flow transport (traffic) services that are determined by the costs incurred in its production. Accordingly, Corridor X the underlying problem of the present study is to analyze the external costs of the branch of Corridor X External cost which, although, belong to the category of social costs borne by society, have the intention to become, Valorization over various regulatory measures (excise), an integral part of the costs of the conveyor. With the aim of the research in this study, which, generally, supports the need for internalization of the external costs, as the essential factors of valorization of the transport corridors, a comparative analysis of external costs of the branch of Corridor X between the road and rail transport was performed.
    [Show full text]
  • Jamova Cesta 2 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenija
    Univerza University v Ljubljani of Ljubljana Fakulteta Faculty of za gradbeništvo Civil and Geodetic in geodezijo Engineering Jamova cesta 2 Jamova cesta 2 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenija SI – 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia http://www3.fgg.uni-lj.si/ http://www3.fgg.uni-lj.si/en/ DRUGG – Digitalni repozitorij UL FGG DRUGG – The Digital Repository http://drugg.fgg.uni-lj.si/ http://drugg.fgg.uni-lj.si/ To je izvirna različica zaključnega dela. This is original version of final thesis. Prosimo, da se pri navajanju sklicujte na When citing, please refer to the publisher's bibliografske podatke, kot je navedeno: bibliographic information as follows: Zupan, A., 2013. Navezava Jadransko - Zupan, A., 2013. Navezava Jadransko - Jonske prometne osi na avtocesto A1 proti Jonske prometne osi na avtocesto A1 proti osrednji Sloveniji. Diplomska naloga. osrednji Sloveniji. B.Sc. Thesis. Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta University of Ljubljani, Faculty of civil za gradbeništvo in geodezijo. (mentor and geodetic engineering. (supervisor Juvanc, A., somentor Jan, A.): 84 str. Juvanc, A., co-supervisor Jan, A.): 84 pp. Datum arhiviranja: 11-09-2014 Archiving Date: 11-09-2014 Univerza Jamova 2 v Ljubljani 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenija telefon (01) 47 68 500 Fakulteta za faks (01) 42 50 681 gradbeništvo in [email protected] geodezijo UNIVERZITETNI ŠTUDIJSKI za PROGRAM GRADBENIŠTVO gradbeništvo PROMETNA SMER in geodezijo Kandidat: ALEŠ ZUPAN NAVEZAVA JADRANSKO - JONSKE PROMETNE OSI NA AVTOCESTO A1 PROTI OSREDNJI SLOVENIJI Diplomska naloga št.: 3324/PS LINKAGE OF ADRIATIC-IONIAN MOTORWAY TO MOTORWAY A1 TOWARDS CENTRAL SLOVENIA Graduation thesis No.: 3324/PS Mentor: Predsednik komisije: doc. dr. Alojzij Juvanc doc.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Report for 2017
    SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2017 SOCIAL FOOTPRINT OF DARS d. d. DARS d. d. IS A COMPANY OF DARS d. d. is well aware of its The Slovenian Government responsibility to people, the environment, introduced toll differentiation with STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE FOR and society. Hence, it exercises social respect to EURO emission classes THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA responsibility in a sustainable manner on 1 January 2010 with the decision AND REPRESENTS THE in all projects and long-term plans at all determining the toll adjustment LARGEST CAPITAL INVESTMENT levels. Ambitious and clearly defined factors for vehicles whose maximum (UNDER THE BALANCE SHEET goals ensure that the public will continue permitted weight exceeds 3,500kg. to identify DARS as a responsible and Vehicles with the lowest emissions BOOK VALUE CRITERION) IN forward-looking company. of harmful particles (higher EURO TRANSPORT. emission classes) are entitled to a reduced tariff. Corporate income tax In EUR 2015: €12,009,362 2016: €19,203,477 2017: €32,981,826 12,009,362 19,203,477 32,981,826 2015 2016 2017 Employees are proud to be employed at VAT In EUR DARS and perform work in a responsible 2015: €67,837,287 and committed manner, as the mirror 2016: €70,538,253 of the Company. That way, employees 2017: €86,370,473 67,837,287 70,538,253 86,370,473 strengthen self-respect, self-confidence 2015 2016 2017 and loyalty, thus enhancing Company reputation. Payment of interest In EUR 2015: €50,020,548 2016: €41,234,923 2017: €40,414,027 50,020,548 41,234,923 40,414,027 2015 2016 2017 Investments in
    [Show full text]
  • Touch & Go and Touch 2 with Go
    Touch & Go and Touch 2 with Go Autumn 2018 map update release notes 4 more pages required in Autumn edition to fit information Keeping up to date with The Toyota Map Update Release Notes Map update information these and many more features: Touch & Go (CY11) helps you stay on track with the map Full map navigation Release date: Autumn 2018 Driver-friendly full map pan-European navigation updates of the Touch & Go and Touch 2 Version: 2018 with clear visual displays for signposts, junctions and lane with Go navigation systems. Database: 2018.Q1 guidance. Media: USB stick or download by user Speed limit and safety Toyota map updates are released at least once a year System vendor: Harman camera alerts Drive safely with the help of a and at a maximum twice. Coverage: Albania, Andorra, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia Herzegovina, speed limit display and warning, including an optional Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Gibraltar, France, speed warning setting. Alerts Keep up with the product information, map changes, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Latvia, notify you of fixed safety Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia (F.Y.R.O.M), Malta, Moldova, camera locations (in countries premium content and sales arguments. where it is legal). Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, San Marino, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, Vatican. Intuitive detour suggestions Real-time traffic information Contents updates* alert you to Touch 2 with Go (CY13/16) congestion ahead on your planned route. The system Map update information 3 Release date: Autumn, 2018 calculates potential delay times and suggests a detour Navigation features 4 Version: 2018 to avoid the problem.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of North Adriatic Ports
    THE ROLE OF NORTH ADRIATIC PORTS Chief Editor: Chen Xin Prepared by Science and Research Centre Koper, Slovenia University of Ljubljana, Slovenia Published by: China-CEE Institute Nonprofit Ltd. Telephone: +36-1-5858-690 E-mail: [email protected] Webpage: www.china-cee.eu Address: 1052, Budapest, Petőfi Sándor utca 11. Chief Editor: Dr. Chen Xin ISSN: 978-615-6124-07-4 Cover design: PONT co.lab Copyright: China-CEE Institute Nonprofit Ltd. The reproduction of the study or parts of the study are prohibited. The findings of the study may only be cited if the source is acknowledged. The Role of North Adriatic Ports Chief Editor: Dr. Chen Xin CHINA-CEE INSTITUTE Budapest, July 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ........................................................................................................ 3 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 5 2 PREVIOUS STUDIES .............................................................................. 8 3 NORTH ADRIATIC PORTS .................................................................. 11 3.1 Overview of the five main northern Adriatic ports .......................... 12 3.1.1 Ravenna................................................................................... 12 3.1.2 Venice (Venezia) ..................................................................... 15 3.1.3 Trieste ..................................................................................... 18 3.1.4 Koper .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017
    ANNUAL REPORT 2017 Ljubljana, April 2018 2 DARS ANNUAL REPORT 2017 2017 REPORT ANNUAL I. BUSINESS REPORT FINANCIAL REPORT II. 3 DARS ANNUAL REPORT 2017 2017 REPORT ANNUAL 4 DARS ANNUAL REPORT 2017 2017 REPORT ANNUAL I. BUSINESS REPORT 5 DARS ANNUAL REPORT 2017 2017 REPORT ANNUAL CONTENT I.BUSINESS REPORT 5 Statement on the Management's responsibility 8 I.1 Information About the Company and Key Business Data 10 I.2 Letter from the Management 16 I.3 Company mission, vision, values, strategic policies and integrated management system policy 18 I.4 Corporate Governance Statement of DARS d.d. 21 I.5 Non-financial reporting at DARS d.d. 26 I.6 Analysis of business performance 27 I.7 Important business events in the 2017 financial year 29 I.8 Risk management 30 I.8.1 Operational risks 30 I.9 Presentation of the Company's business activities 35 I.9.1 Performance and attainment of plans 35 I.9.2 Toll collection 36 I.9.3 Motorway maintenance 37 I.9.4 Traffic safety management and provision 38 I.9.5 Investments 41 I.9.6 Debt repayment 45 I.10 Motorways and express ways in RS and traffic loads 46 I.11 Investments in motorway development and reconstruction 54 I.11.1 Investments on behalf of RS and for its account 54 I.11.2 Investments on behalf of and for the account of DARS d.d. 54 I.12 International cooperation and acquisition of European grants 55 I.13 Self-assessment using the EFQM excellence model 56 I.14 Integrated management system 57 I.15 Internal audit 58 I.16 Sustainable development 59 I.16.1 Strategic management of sustainable development at DARS d.d.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report 22.04.2020
    DAILY REPORT 22.04.2020. DAILY REPORT 22.04.2020. Reporting time: 08.00 h S ERBIA HORGOŠ: • Entry to Serbia; waiting time 1 hour, 10 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 1-2 hours, 30 trucks in the waiting line that is 1.5 km long. KELEBIA • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 30 minutes, 3 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 1 hour, 15 trucks in the waiting line. TOVARNIK-ŠID • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 30 minutes, 3 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 30 minutes, 4 trucks in the waiting line. • On Tovarnik-Šid border crossing, the goods coming from Croatia can enter only if export customs clearance was done in Croatia. The goods going to Croatia for unloading should undergo customs clearance in Croatia. BATROVCI • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 20 minutes, 4 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 4 hours, 2-3 km long waiting line. PREŠEVO BORDER CROSSING • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 20 minutes, 3 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 40 minutes, 4-5 trucks in the waiting line. GRADINA • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 1-2 hours, 10 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 30 minutes, 4-5 trucks in the waiting line. VATIN • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 30 minutes, 3 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: no delays. As of April 6th, there will be no transit traffic towards Romania through border crossings Srpska Crnja and Đerdap.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic and Social Council
    UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. Council GENERAL TRANS/WP.5/2002/4 7 June 2002 ENGLISH ONLY ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE INLAND TRANSPORT COMMITTEE Working Party on Transport Trends and Economics (Fifteenth session, 2- 4 September 2002, agenda item 6) STATUS OF THE PAN-EUROPEAN TRANSPORT CORRIDORS AND TRANSPORT AREAS DEVELOPMENTS AND ACTIVITIES IN 2000 AND 2001 FINAL REPORT Transmitted by TINA and the European Commission (EU) Note: The report is reproduced as received from TINA and the European Commission (EU). * * * TRANS/WP.5/2002/4 page 2 EUROPEAN COMMISSION TRANSPORT STRATEGIES DG ENERGY & TRANSPORT STATUS OF THE PAN-EUROPEAN TRANSPORT CORRIDORS AND TRANSPORT AREAS DEVELOPMENTS AND ACTIVITIES IN 2000 AND 2001 FINAL REPORT Vienna, April 2002 TRANS/WP.5/2002/4 page 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 6 EXTENDING THE EUROPEAN UNION TO CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE 7 THE PAN-EUROPEAN TRANSPORT CORRIDORS AND TRANSPORT AREAS 7 CO-ORDINATION OFFICE FOR THE RAILWAY CORRIDORS IV AND X AND CORRIDOR VII - DANUBE 9 FINANCING INSTRUMENTS provided by the European Commission for projects along the Corridors 10 FINANCIAL AID FROM THE TEN-T BUDGET FOR PROJECTS WITHIN THE EU MEMBER STATES 10 FINANCIAL AID FROM REGIONAL FUNDS 10 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS TO ASSIST THE CANDIDATE COUNTRIES IN THE PREPARATION FOR ACCESSION 12 TACIS PROGRAMME FOR PROJECTS WITHIN THE NEW INDEPENDENT STATES (NIS) 13 INTERNATIONAL FINANCING INSTITUTIONS 14 TRADE AND TRAFFIC FLOWS 17 EU AND ACCESSION COUNTRIES 17 TRAFFIC FLOWS 20 STATUS OF THE PAN-EUROPEAN TRANSPORT CORRIDORS
    [Show full text]