DOCSLIB.ORG

Economic and Social Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Economic and Social Council UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. Council GENERAL TRANS/WP.5/2002/4 7 June 2002 ENGLISH ONLY ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE INLAND TRANSPORT COMMITTEE Working Party on Transport Trends and Economics (Fifteenth session, 2- 4 September 2002, agenda item 6) STATUS OF THE PAN-EUROPEAN TRANSPORT CORRIDORS AND TRANSPORT AREAS DEVELOPMENTS AND ACTIVITIES IN 2000 AND 2001 FINAL REPORT Transmitted by TINA and the European Commission (EU) Note: The report is reproduced as received from TINA and the European Commission (EU). * * * TRANS/WP.5/2002/4 page 2 EUROPEAN COMMISSION TRANSPORT STRATEGIES DG ENERGY & TRANSPORT STATUS OF THE PAN-EUROPEAN TRANSPORT CORRIDORS AND TRANSPORT AREAS DEVELOPMENTS AND ACTIVITIES IN 2000 AND 2001 FINAL REPORT Vienna, April 2002 TRANS/WP.5/2002/4 page 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 6 EXTENDING THE EUROPEAN UNION TO CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE 7 THE PAN-EUROPEAN TRANSPORT CORRIDORS AND TRANSPORT AREAS 7 CO-ORDINATION OFFICE FOR THE RAILWAY CORRIDORS IV AND X AND CORRIDOR VII - DANUBE 9 FINANCING INSTRUMENTS provided by the European Commission for projects along the Corridors 10 FINANCIAL AID FROM THE TEN-T BUDGET FOR PROJECTS WITHIN THE EU MEMBER STATES 10 FINANCIAL AID FROM REGIONAL FUNDS 10 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS TO ASSIST THE CANDIDATE COUNTRIES IN THE PREPARATION FOR ACCESSION 12 TACIS PROGRAMME FOR PROJECTS WITHIN THE NEW INDEPENDENT STATES (NIS) 13 INTERNATIONAL FINANCING INSTITUTIONS 14 TRADE AND TRAFFIC FLOWS 17 EU AND ACCESSION COUNTRIES 17 TRAFFIC FLOWS 20 STATUS OF THE PAN-EUROPEAN TRANSPORT CORRIDORS 25 CORRIDOR I 25 ALIGNMENT: 25 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT: 25 TECHNICAL FEATURES OF CORRIDOR I: 27 COST ESTIMATIONS PER COUNTRY: 28 DEVELOPMENTS ALONG THE CORRIDOR 29 CORRIDOR II 36 ALIGNMENT: 36 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT: 36 TECHNICAL FEATURES OF THE CORRIDOR II: 39 TRANS/WP.5/2002/4 page 4 COST ESTIMATIONS PER COUNTRY: 40 DEVELOPMENTS ALONG THE CORRIDOR 41 CORRIDOR III 44 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT: 44 TECHNICAL FEATURES OF CORRIDOR III: 45 COST ESTIMATIONS PER COUNTRY: 45 DEVELOPMENTS ALONG THE CORRIDOR 46 CORRIDOR IV 49 ALIGNMENT: 49 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT: 49 TECHNICAL FEATURES OF THE CORRIDOR IV: 50 COST ESTIMATIONS PER COUNTRY: 51 DEVELOPMENTS ALONG THE CORRIDOR 52 CORRIDOR V 70 ALIGNMENT: 70 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT: 70 TECHNICAL FEATURES OF CORRIDOR V: 71 COST ESTIMATIONS PER COUNTRY: 72 DEVELOPMENTS ALONG THE CORRIDOR 73 CORRIDOR VI 76 ALIGNMENT: 76 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT: 76 TECHNICAL FEATURES OF CORRIDOR VI: 77 COST ESTIMATIONS PER COUNTRY: 78 DEVELOPMENTS ALONG THE CORRIDOR 79 CORRIDOR VII 82 ALIGNMENT: 82 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT: 82 TECHNICAL FEATURES OF THE CORRIDOR VII: 85 COST ESTIMATIONS PER COUNTRY: 86 TRANS/WP.5/2002/4 page 5 DEVELOPMENTS ALONG THE CORRIDOR 86 CORRIDOR VIII 89 ALIGNMENT: 89 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT: 89 TECHNICAL FEATURES OF THE CORRIDOR VIII: 90 COST ESTIMATIONS PER COUNTRY: 91 DEVELOPMENTS ALONG THE CORRIDOR 92 CORRIDOR IX 93 ALIGNMENT: 93 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT: 93 TECHNICAL FEATURES OF THE CORRIDOR IX: 94 COST ESTIMATIONS PER COUNTRY: 95 DEVELOPMENTS ALONG THE CORRIDOR 96 CORRIDOR X 110 ALIGNMENT: 110 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT: 110 TECHNICAL FEATURES OF CORRIDOR X: 111 COST ESTIMATIONS PER COUNTRY: 112 DEVELOPMENTS ALONG THE CORRIDOR 114 STATUS OF THE PAN-EUROPEAN TRANSPORT AREAS 120 BARENTS-EURO ARCTIC TRANSPORT AREA 120 BLACK SEA TRANSPORT AREA 122 ADRIATIC-IONIAN SEAS TRANSPORT AREA 125 MEDITERRANEAN TRANSPORT AREA 125 LIST OF CONTACTS 126 CORRIDOR MAPS 130 TRANS/WP.5/2002/4 page 6 INTRODUCTION At the beginning of the 21st century, European transport systems are confronted with a serious modal imbalance, which has favoured the development of the most polluting and congested modes of transport. This requires a change of strategy in the Common Transport Policy, which puts users at the centre of the system, guaranteeing their right to efficient, safe, affordable, and environment-friendly transport. As global freight transport volumes have increased, the external costs of traffic congestion, accidents, air pollution and noise have become more apparent, not only as an issue of concern for the quality of life, but also with respect to their potential for disrupting economic growth and mobility. As a result, one of the major challenges facing the transportation industry is the need to introduce a more efficient, modally integrated service, which utilizes spare capacity in other modes. During the 1990s, Europe began to suffer from congestion in certain areas and on certain routes. The problem is now beginning to threaten economic competitiveness. Traffic jams cost Europe dear in terms of productivity. Bottlenecks and missing links in the infrastructure fabric; lack of interoperability between modes and systems. Because of congestion, there is a serious risk that Europe will lose economic competitiveness. Recent studies on the subject showed that the external costs of road traffic congestion alone amount to 0.5% of Community GDP. Traffic forecasts for the next ten years show that, if nothing is done road congestion and the costs attributable to it will increase significantly by 2010. The transport industry occupies an important position in the Community, accounting for 7 % of its GDP, 7 % of total employment, 40 % of Member States' investment and 30 % of Community energy consumption. Demand, particularly in intra-Community traffic, has grown more or less constantly for the last 20 years, by 2.3 % a year for goods and 3.1 % for passengers. The European Commission adopted the White Paper “European Transport Policy for 2010: Time to decide” in which users’ needs are placed at the heart of the strategy. One of the first measures proposed is to shift the balance between modes of transport by 2010 by revitalizing the railways, promoting maritime and inland waterway transport and linking up the different modes of transport. This approach is also the same as the approach adopted in the Commission's contribution to the Gothenburg European Council which called for a shift of balance between the modes by way of an investment policy in infrastructure geared to the railways, inland waterways, short sea shipping and intermodal operations (COM (2001) 264 final). To set the scene for a sustainable transport policy that will allow the progress of recent years to continue but with a reduced level of nuisances - emissions, noise etc. The question is what sort of growth can be absorbed without the roads resulting so congested that delays become the norm and operating costs increase considerable. If we do not intervene, it is likely that the demand for road haulage services would increase by 50% between 1998 and 2010. Therefore it is time to invest more intelligently, to seek transport capacity beyond the road and to set up priorities where weaknesses are in the transport system: in sorting out bottlenecks, in supporting greater use of modes which are today under-utilised. TRANS/WP.5/2002/4 page 7 EXTENDING THE EUROPEAN UNION TO CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE Enlargement is an historic opportunity for further European integration. It embraces thirteen candidate countries: Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia and Turkey. Negotiations opened in 1998 with six candidate countries and in 2000 with further six ones. The energy and transport chapters were opened for negotiations in November 1999. With Turkey an analytical examination of the acquis’ is being developed. In the transport sector the candidate countries for accession are in the process of establishing and implementing programme of approximation to the EU transport acquis. The acquis supporting the Common Transport Policy represents about 10% of the total EU acquis and more legislation is in the pipeline. Apart from the development and upgrading of the transport infrastructure networks, which upon accession will form part of the enlarged Trans-European transport network, the transport issues which need to be addressed as a matter of priority are as follows: • in road transport, issues relating to the technology, safety and environment legislation, as well as market access, fiscal matters and social legislation; • in rail transport, the integration of services between EU and CEEC railway companies, as well as improving the latter's organisation and financial situation to operate in market conditions; • in inland waterway transport, issues concerning fleet capacity; • in air transport, issues relating to market access and safety and infrastructure organisation; and • in maritime transport, the enforcement of the maritime safety acquis. The Commission evaluates annually the progress made in candidate countries in its “Regular Reports on countries’ progress towards accession”. The transport chapter has been closed provisionally for Cyprus and Malta, for all other candidate countries for accession the transport chapter is still under negotiation. THE PAN-EUROPEAN TRANSPORT CORRIDORS AND TRANSPORT AREAS The Pan-European Transport Network has been developed along with three Pan-European Transport conferences. The set out of the first Pan-European Transport conference in Prague in 1991 was an appropriate concept for transport infrastructure, which became the corridor concept. At the second Pan-European Transport conference in Crete in 1994, the countries of Western, Central and Eastern Europe identified nine long-distance transport corridors as priorities for infrastructure development. At the third Pan-European Transport conference in Helsinki in June 1997 a tenth corridor and the Pan-European Transport Areas for maritime basins were added. These multi-modal Corridors, so called Helsinki Corridors, have a total length of about 48,000 km, of which 25,000 km are rail network and 23,000 km are road network. Airports, sea- and river ports and major terminals serve as nodes between the modes along these long distance interconnections between the Central and Eastern European countries. The concept of a Pan-European Transport Infrastructure Investment Partnership promotes the establishment of all the necessary components for a future Pan-European Transport Network on the territory of the European Union, in the candidate countries for accession, the New Independent States (NIS) and beyond.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Economic and Social Council
    UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. Council GENERAL TRANS/WP.5/2005/16/Add.8 24 October 2005 ENGLISH ONLY ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE INLAND TRANSPORT COMMITTEE Working Party on Transport Trends and Economics (Eighteenth session, 15-16 September 2005, agenda item 3(b)) MONITORING OF DEVELOPMENTS RELEVANT FOR THE PAN-EUROPEAN TRANSPORT CORRIDORS AND AREAS Infrastructure bottlenecks and missing links Transmitted by the Government of Hungary According to the report on “Infrastructure Bottlenecks and Missing Links in the European Transport Network” bottlenecks can be caused by: (1) insufficient infrastructure capacity; (2) low quality of transport infrastructure. In the same manner, the phenomenon of a “missing link” may be considered as a situation in which the quality of service has extremely low values due to the fact that no direct link exists between two points. As described in the above-mentioned document, as a simplified method, for individual road categories, one may take the following capacities in terms of number of vehicles as the average daily traffic: − 4-lane motorway: 40,000 – 60,000 PCU/24 hrs − roads of 2 lanes: 8,000 – 12,000 PCU/24 hrs As in the case of roads, there are a great number of factors determining the bottlenecks on a railway line. It is practically impossible to concentrate all elements in a single bottleneck measure. In order to reach practical measures it appeared appropriate to take the following capacity limits: TRANS/WP.5/2005/16/Add.8 page 2 − Single track main lines: 1 x 60 – 80 trains/day − Double track main lines: 2 x 100 – 200 trains/day According to that definition, the bottlenecks regarding the Hungarian TEN road network are described below.
    [Show full text]
  • Mediterranean Corridor Work Plan
    Mediterranean Work Plan of the European Coordinator Laurens Jan Brinkhorst Transport MAY 2015 This report represents the opinion of the European Coordinator and does not prejudice the official position of the European Commission. 1. Towards the Mediterranean Corridor work plan On 1 January 2014 a new era has begun in European infrastructure policy with the setting up of nine core network corridors led by a European coordinator and the creation of the Connecting Europe Facility as financing instrument. This new framework includes not only the Member States but also all other stakeholders of the Corridor: infrastructure managers (for road, rail, ports, inland waterways, airports and multi-modal terminals), regions and representatives of the transport industry as users of the infrastructure. All these stakeholders come together in the Corridor Forum: four meetings of the Corridor Forum have been held in 2014 and have functioned as unique platform allowing a transparent and constantly deepening dialogue. Furthermore, the Corridor Forum served as the “testing ground” of many of the findings and recommendations presented in this document. This work plan is largely based on the study of the Mediterranean corridor (the Corridor Study) carried out in 2014. It is presented as the result of the collaborative efforts of the Member States, the European Commission, external consultants and chaired by the European Coordinator. The work plan has been elaborated in accordance with the provisions of Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 which establishes Union guidelines for the development of the trans- European transport network (the Regulation)1. The concept of core network corridors rests on three pillars: modal integration, interoperability and the coordinated development of its infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brochure Visit Adriatic Museums: from Italy to the Balkans
    Visit Adriatic Museums from Italy to the Balkans Visit Adriatic Museums from Italy to the Balkans This document has been produced with the financial assistance the museumcultour project 04 of the IPA Adriatic Cross-Border Cooperation Programme. The project partners 05 contents of this document are the sole responsibility of DELTA the adriatic photo exhibition 08 2000 soc. Cons a .rl. under no circumstances be regarded museums’ network 11 as reflecting the position of the IPA Adriatic Cross-Border italy Cooperation Programme Authorities. museo del mare di san benedetto del tronto 13 Pubblication realized by DELTA 2000, Consortium Company with limited liability, musei della cartiera papale di ascoli piceno 18 Ostellato (ITALY) www.deltaduemila.net museo natura di sant’alberto 25 In cooperation with: ecomuseo di argenta 30 Ecomuseo di Argenta (FE - ITALY) www.vallidiargenta.org manifattura dei marinati comacchio 35 Manifattura dei Marinati, Comacchio (FE - ITALY) www.aqua-deltadelpo.com museo del territorio di ostellato 40 Musei della Cartiera Papale di Ascoli Piceno (AP - ITALY) www.museicartierapapale.it Museo del Cervo e del Bosco della Mesola, Mesola (FE - ITALY) www.prolocomesola.it museo del cervo e del bosco della mesola 45 Museo del Mare di San Benedetto del Tronto (AP - ITALY) www.museodelmaresbt.it slovenia Museo del Territorio di Ostellato (FE - ITALY) www.atlantide.net Museo NatuRa, Sant’Alberto (RA - ITALY) www.atlantide.net notranjski muzej postojna 51 Muzeumet Berat (ALBANIA) www.muzeumet-berat.al postojnska jama cave-grotte-höhle
    [Show full text]
  • 1-Kongres 2014 ABSTRAKT CB.Pdf
    ЗБОРНИК АБСТРАКАТА Први српски конгрес о путевима , 5-6 јун 2014. BOOK OF ABSTRACTS First Serbian Road Congress , June 5-6 2014. Издавач Српско друштво за путеве " VIA-VITA" Кумодрашка 257, 11000 Београд За издавача Душан Богојевић Уредници проф. др Милан Вујанић Биљана Вуксановић, дипл. инж. грађ. Графички дизајн: Омнибус, Београд Штампа: Дедрапласт, Београд Тираж: 300 ISBN: 978-86-88541-01-5 ЗБОРНИК АБСТРАКАТА Први српски конгрес о путевима , 5-6 јун 2014. BOOK OF ABSTRACTS First Serbian Road Congress , June 5-6 2014. Српско друштво за путеве " VIA-VITA" Београд , 2014. САДРЖАЈ Уводна реч Милан Вујанић... 15 Поздравна реч Биљана Вуксановић... 17 ТЕМА 1... Студије и пројектовање / Studies and Design SOIL TREATMENT WITH LIME FOR FINE CLAYEY SOILS: AN ECONOMICAL SOLUTION FOR SUBGRADE, SUB BASE, BASE & CAPPING LAYERS Christophe Denayer, Gabriele Tebaldi... 21 MAGISTRALNI PUT M18 (E 762) FOČA (BIH) - ŠĆEPAN POLJE (CG) KAO DIO GLAVNE PUTNE MREŽE REGIONA - PROJEKTOVANJE I MODERNIZACIJA Predrag Šarkinović, Elvir Alić, Mario Jerčinović... 21 ODABIR OPTIMALNOG SISTEMA NAPLATE PUTARINE ZA MREŽU AUTOPUTEVA REPUBLIKE SRPSKE "CASE STUDY" Draženko Glavić... 22 PREGLED DIMENZIONIRANJA SAVITLJIVIH KOLNIČKIH KONSTRUKCIJA U EUROPSKOJ I NAŠOJ REGULATIVI Boris Čutura, Ivan Lovrić, Branko Mazić... 23 EKSPERIMENTALNO ISPITIVANJE STABILNOSTI POTPORNIH ZIDOVA OD PREFABRIKOVANIH BETONBLOK ELEMENATA Nebojša Davidović, Zoran Bonić, Verka Prolović, Nikola Romić, Nikola Davidović... 24 PROJEKAT AUTOPUTA E-80 NIŠ – DIMITROVGRAD Milosav Rajković... 24 HIJERARHIJSKA KONTROLA PRISTUPA NA DRŽAVNE PUTEVE - OBAVEZA PLANERA/PROJEKTANTA Dušan Savković... 26 EVALUATION OF TRAVEL TIME DATA COLLECTION AND TRAFFIC MONITORING TECHNOLOGIES FOR A WIDE-AREA NETWORK Reza Omrani, Pedram Izadpanah, Goran Nikolic, Alireza Hadayeghi... 26 ИЗВОЂЕЊЕ ТУНЕЛА ''БАНЦАРЕВО'' Слободан Савић..
    [Show full text]
  • Public-Private Partnerships Financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020
    EUROPEAN PPP EXPERTISE CENTRE Public-private partnerships financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020 March 2021 Public-private partnerships financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020 March 2021 Terms of Use of this Publication The European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC) is part of the Advisory Services of the European Investment Bank (EIB). It is an initiative that also involves the European Commission, Member States of the EU, Candidate States and certain other States. For more information about EPEC and its membership, please visit www.eib.org/epec. The findings, analyses, interpretations and conclusions contained in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the EIB or any other EPEC member. No EPEC member, including the EIB, accepts any responsibility for the accuracy of the information contained in this publication or any liability for any consequences arising from its use. Reliance on the information provided in this publication is therefore at the sole risk of the user. EPEC authorises the users of this publication to access, download, display, reproduce and print its content subject to the following conditions: (i) when using the content of this document, users should attribute the source of the material and (ii) under no circumstances should there be commercial exploitation of this document or its content. Purpose and Methodology This report is part of EPEC’s work on monitoring developments in the public-private partnership (PPP) market. It is intended to provide an overview of the role played by the EIB in financing PPP projects inside and outside of Europe since 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • 3Rd Workplan
    Baltic Adriatic Third Work Plan of the European Coordinator Kurt Bodewig APRIL 2018 Mobility and Transport APRIL 2018 This report represents the opinion of the European Coordinator and does not prejudice the official position of the European Commission. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for any potential use which may be made of the information contained herein. Publication date: April 2018 Reference source of analysis: 2015-2017 Baltic-Adriatic Corridor Study, Final Report, January 2018 Contents 1. Towards the third Baltic-Adriatic corridor work plan .................................... 5 2. Characteristics of the Baltic-Adriatic Corridor ............................................... 8 2.1. From the Polish to the Adriatic ports – corridor alignment ........................... 8 2.2. Compliance with the technical infrastructure parameters of the TEN-T guidelines in 2017 ........................................................................ 9 2.3. Progress of corridor development ............................................................17 3. Transport market analysis .......................................................................... 19 3.1. Results of the multimodal transport market study .....................................19 3.2. Capacity issues on the rail and road networks ..........................................23 4. Planned projects along the Baltic-Adriatic Corridor
    [Show full text]
  • A Captive Island Kaliningrad Between MOSCOW and the EU
    41 A CAPTIVE ISLAND KAlInIngRAD bETWEEn MOSCOW AnD ThE EU Jadwiga Rogoża, Agata Wierzbowska-Miazga, Iwona Wiśniewska NUMBER 41 WARSAW JULY 2012 A CAPTIVE ISLAND KALININGRAD BETWEEN MOSCOW AND THE EU Jadwiga Rogoża, Agata Wierzbowska-Miazga, Iwona Wiśniewska © Copyright by Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia / Centre for Eastern Studies CONTENT EDITORS Adam Eberhardt, Marek Menkiszak EDITORS Katarzyna Kazimierska, Anna Łabuszewska TRANSLATION Ilona Duchnowicz CO-OPERATION Jim Todd GRAPHIC DESIGN PARA-BUCH CHARTS, MAP, PHOTOGRAPH ON COVER Wojciech Mańkowski DTP GroupMedia PuBLISHER Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia Centre for Eastern Studies ul. Koszykowa 6a, Warsaw, Poland Phone + 48 /22/ 525 80 00 Fax: + 48 /22/ 525 80 40 osw.waw.pl ISBN 978–83–62936–13–7 Contents KEY POINTS /5 INTRODUCTION /8 I. KALININGRAD OBLAST: A SUBJECT OR AN OBJECT OF THE F EDERATION? /9 1. THE AMBER ISLAND: Kaliningrad today /9 1.1. Kaliningrad in the legal, political and economic space of the Russian Federation /9 1.2. Current political situation /13 1.3. The current economic situation /17 1.4. The social situation /24 1.5. Characteristics of the Kaliningrad residents /27 1.6. The ecological situation /32 2. AN AREA UNDER SPECIAL SURVEILLANCE: Moscow’s policy towards the region /34 2.1. The policy of compensating for Kaliningrad’s location as an exclave /34 2.2. The policy of reinforcing social ties with the rest of Russia /43 2.3. The policy of restricted access for foreign partners to the region /45 2.4. The policy of controlling the region’s co-operation with other countries /47 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Documents.Worldbank.Org
    46730 THE WORLD BANK GROUP WASHINGTON, D.C. TP-23 TRANSPORT PAPERS NOVEMBER 2008 Public Disclosure Authorized Road User Charges: Current Practice and Perspectives in Central and Eastern Europe Cesar Queiroz, Barbara Rdzanowska, Robert Garbarczyk and Michel Audige Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized TRANSPORT SECTOR BOARD ROAD USER CHARGES: CURRENT PRACTICE AND PERSPECTIVES IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE Cesar Queiroz, Barbara Rdzanowska, Robert Garbarczyk and Michel Audige THE WORLD BANK WASHINGTON, D.C. © 2008 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington, DC 20433 Telephone 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org This volume is a product of the staff of The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA; telephone: 978-750-8400; fax: 978-750-4470; Internet: www.copyright.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Connection Between Inland Water Development And
    Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, February 2016, Vol. 11, No. 1, p. 293 - 301 CONNECTION BETWEEN INLAND EXCESS WATER DEVELOPMENT AND MOTORWAYS Károly BARTA1, József SZATMÁRI1 & Ádám POSTA2 1Department of Physical Geography and Geoinformatics, University of Szeged, 2-6 Egyetem Street, Szeged 6720 Hungary, [email protected] 2Department of Social and Human Geography, University of Szeged, 2-6 Egyetem Street, Szeged 6720 Hungary Abstract: It has been known for a long time that linear infrastructures (railways, roads, embankments) significantly influence surface and subsurface horizontal water movements. Clear evidence can be observed at places where oxbows and abandoned meanders are crossed by roads, while the effect can hardly be shown at lowlands free from linear water drainage forms. This research seeks to answer the question of whether the motorways opened in the last 10 years around Szeged, SE Hungary (M5, M43), have any role in the appearance of extended patterns of inland excess water along certain sections of the motorways. The infiltration conditions of two selected sample sites were determined by soil and geodetic studies and it was also possible to determine the elevation of the groundwater level. The analysis of results underlines the significant effect of linear infrastructures. Inland excess water patterns along the studied highway sections are caused by the motorway M43. Keywords: inland excess water, motorway, groundwater movement, anthropogenic effects, soil compaction 1. INTRODUCTION as being lowest-risk areas on the maps of inland excess water risk and inundation frequency (Bozán The natural drainage networks and et al., 2008; Kozák, 2008; Körösparti et al., 2009; hydrological systems are seriously influenced by Pásztor et al., 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Budapest and Central Danube Region
    Touristic areas of the Budapest and Central Danube Region www.hungary.com Talent for entertaining Forest Tourinform Office Etyek-Buda wine region Residence Kunság wine region Castle National Park Castle ruin Region’s border Museum Highway Thermal/wellness bath Railway Airport Ferry World Heritage Budapest – Central Danube Region “Why Budapest and its surrounding area?” This is the obvious question holiday makers will ask when planning their travels, and we hope to provide the answer. Budapest, Heroes’ Square Budapest because: • it is the cultural, political and transportation centre of Hungary; • it is built on both side of the Danube, the great European river that is registered as a World Heritage panorama; • nature is safeguarded in two national parks and a number of environmental protection areas; • it has represented a “multicultural Europe” for centuries – over 200 nearby villages are populated by Hungarians, Serbs, Slovaks and Germans (Swabians); • it has a strong artistic and cultural heritage; • there’s always something happening: festivals, concerts, theatre perform- ances, sports competitions, exhibitions, church events, wine celebrations or handicraft fairs; • there are many outdoor activities to enjoy: trekking, rock climbing, biking, horse riding, golf, rowing, swimming, potholing or fl ying; • its restaurants offer not only Hungarian cuisine – and wine and palinka – but food from all over the world. Don’t hesitate – come to Budapest, the centre of things! Széchenyi Thermal Baths (We have marked our suggested “must-see” destinations with ***. However, these are naturally subjective selections, and we hope that our guests will fi nd their own three-star experiences.) MT ZRT www.itthon.hu Visegrád Castle Games 1 Budapest – Central Danube Region Budapest Buda Castle and Chain Bridge When you arrive in Budapest, head to the centre and drink in the view of the city’s two parts, divided by the Danube and linked by the bridges that cross it.
    [Show full text]
  • DLA Piper. Details of the Member Entities of DLA Piper Are Available on the Website
    EUROPEAN PPP REPORT 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Report has been published with particular thanks to: The EPEC Executive and in particular, Livia Dumitrescu, Goetz von Thadden, Mathieu Nemoz and Laura Potten. Those EPEC Members and EIB staff who commented on the country reports. Each of the contributors of a ‘View from a Country’. Line Markert and Mikkel Fritsch from Horten for assistance with the report on Denmark. Andrei Aganimov from Borenius & Kemppinen for assistance with the report on Finland. Maura Capoulas Santos and Alberto Galhardo Simões from Miranda Correia Amendoeira & Associados for assistance with the report on Portugal. Gustaf Reuterskiöld and Malin Cope from DLA Nordic for assistance with the report on Sweden. Infra-News for assistance generally and in particular with the project lists. All those members of DLA Piper who assisted with the preparation of the country reports and finally, Rosemary Bointon, Editor of the Report. Production of Report and Copyright This European PPP Report 2009 ( “Report”) has been produced and edited by DLA Piper*. DLA Piper acknowledges the contribution of the European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC)** in the preparation of the Report. DLA Piper retains editorial responsibility for the Report. In contributing to the Report neither the European Investment Bank, EPEC, EPEC’s Members, nor any Contributor*** indicates or implies agreement with, or endorsement of, any part of the Report. This document is the copyright of DLA Piper and the Contributors. This document is confidential and personal to you. It is provided to you on the understanding that it is not to be re-used in any way, duplicated or distributed without the written consent of DLA Piper or the relevant Contributor.
    [Show full text]
  • BTC EGTC, Region's Bridge of Innovation
    BTC EGTC, 20 region’s bridge 18 of innovation Preface City mayors from three countries collaboration. This is particularly have created the idea of the important for us, since we want to Grouping in 2009. keep economical, commercial, social The Grouping was established in contacts in the region covered by order to achieve their main goal BTC EGTC group. - the reducing of development The Grouping’s primary goal is a diff erences in the area surrounding harmonical regional development, the Hungarian-Romanian-Serbian improvement of the economical, border. social and territorial cohesion, as The establishment of BTC EGTC well as enabling a successful cross- provides such opportunities, which border collaboration. help to remove the borders in the region, and build bridges between BTC EGTC the local authorities, in their organization 2 BTC EGTC Introduction On 17th June 2009, almost fi fty mayors from the triple-border region municipalities decided to establish a European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC) named „Banat - Triplex Confi nium” in a summit in Mórahalom. The headquarters of the Group is also in Mórahalom. The initial membership of BTC EGTC contained 37 Hungarian municipalities, 37 Romanian municipalities, as well as 8 Serbian towns as observing members. Another three Hungarian municipalities joined the Group in 2012 - Csengele, Kistelek and Zá- kányszék. Banat-Triplex Confi nium EGTC members are the following: BTC EGTC, region’s bridge of innovation 2018 Hungary • Ambrózfalva • Ferencszállás • Kunbaja • Öttömös • Apátfalva
    [Show full text]