DOCSLIB.ORG

CLOMAZONE Volume 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CLOMAZONE Volume 1 European Commission Proposal for Harmonised Classification and Labelling Based on Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP Regulation) CLOMAZONE Volume 1 Clomazone (ISO); 2-(2-chlorobenzyl)-4,4-dimethyl-1,2-oxazolidin-3-one EC: - CAS: 81777-89-1 Rapporteur Member State: Denmark Co-Rapporteur Member State: Germany September 2018 Clomazone Volume 1 Version History When What 2005/March Initial DAR 2005/June Revised Vol. 1 2018/January Draft RAR 2018/October Revised vol. 1 according to ECHA accordance check. 2 Clomazone Volume 1 Table of contents RAPPORTEUR MEMBER STATE: DENMARK ............................................................................................. 1 1 STATEMENT OF SUBJECT MATTER AND PURPOSE FOR WHICH THIS REPORT HAS BEEN PREPARED AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION ................................... 9 1.1 CONTEXT IN WHICH THIS DRAFT ASSESSMENT REPORT WAS PREPARED ................................................ 9 1.1.1 Purpose for which the draft assessment report was prepared ............................................................. 9 1.1.2 Arrangements between rapporteur Member State and co-rapporteur Member State .......................... 9 1.1.3 EU Regulatory history for use in Plant Protection Products .............................................................. 9 1.1.4 Evaluations carried out under other regulatory contexts .................................................................. 10 1.2 APPLICANT INFORMATION ..................................................................................................................... 10 1.2.1 Name and address of applicant(s) for approval of the active substance ........................................... 10 1.2.2 Producer or producers of the active substance ................................................................................. 12 1.2.3 Information relating to the collective provision of dossiers ............................................................. 13 1.3 IDENTITY OF THE ACTIVE SUBSTANCE ................................................................................................... 13 1.3.1 Common name proposed or ISO-accepted and synonyms ............................................................... 13 1.3.2 Chemical name (IUPAC and CA nomenclature) ............................................................................. 13 1.3.3 Producer’s development code number ............................................................................................. 13 1.3.4 CAS, EEC and CIPAC numbers ..................................................................................................... 13 1.3.5 Molecular and structural formula, molecular mass .......................................................................... 13 1.3.6 Method of manufacture (synthesis pathway) of the active substance............................................... 14 1.3.7 Specification of purity of the active substance in g/kg .................................................................... 14 1.3.8 Identity and content of additives (such as stabilisers) and impurities .............................................. 14 1.3.8.1 Additives ............................................................................................................................................... 14 1.3.8.2 Significant impurities ............................................................................................................. 14 1.3.8.3 Relevant impurities ................................................................................................................. 14 1.3.9 Analytical profile of batches ........................................................................................................... 14 1.4 INFORMATION ON THE PLANT PROTECTION PRODUCT .......................................................................... 14 B.1.1.1. Applicant ......................................................................................................................................................... 14 B.1.1.2. Producer of the plant protection product .......................................................................................... 14 B.1.1.3. Trade name or proposed trade name and producer's development code number of the plant protection product ........................................................................................................................... 14 B.1.1.4. Detailed quantitative and qualitative information on the composition of the plant protection product ........................................................................................................................................................ 14 B.1.1.4.1. Composition of the plant protection product .......................................................................... 15 B.1.1.4.2. Information on the active substances ...................................................................................... 15 B.1.1.4.3. Information on safeners, synergists and co-formulants ........................................................... 15 B.1.1.5. Type and code of the plant protection product ................................................................................. 15 B.1.1.6. Function ........................................................................................................................................................... 15 B.1.1.7. Field of use envisaged ...................................................................................................................... 15 B.1.1.8. Effects on harmful organisms ........................................................................................................... 15 1.4.1 Applicant ........................................................................................................................................................ 15 1.4.2 Producer of the plant protection product ......................................................................................... 16 1.4.3 Trade name or proposed trade name and producer's development code number of the plant protection product ........................................................................................................................... 16 1.4.4 Detailed quantitative and qualitative information on the composition of the plant protection product ............................................................................................................................................................ 16 1.4.4.1 Composition of the plant protection product .......................................................................... 16 1.4.4.2 Information on the active substances ...................................................................................... 16 1.4.4.3 Information on safeners, synergists and co-formulants ........................................................... 16 3 Clomazone Volume 1 1.4.5 Type and code of the plant protection product ................................................................................ 16 1.4.6 Function .......................................................................................................................................... 16 1.4.7 Field of use envisaged ..................................................................................................................... 17 1.4.8 Effects on harmful organisms ......................................................................................................... 17 1.5 DETAILED USES OF THE PLANT PROTECTION PRODUCT ........................................................................ 17 1.5.1 Details of representative uses .......................................................................................................... 18 1.5.2 Further information on representative uses ..................................................................................... 20 1.5.3 Details of other uses applied for to support the setting of MRLs for uses beyond the representative uses ................................................................................................................................................. 20 1.5.4 Overview on authorisations in EU Member States ......................................................................... 20 2 SUMMARY OF ACTIVE SUBSTANCE HAZARD AND OF PRODUCT RISK ASSESSMENT ........ 25 2.1 IDENTITY ................................................................................................................................................ 30 2.1.1 Summary of identity ....................................................................................................................... 30 2.2 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES [EQUIVALENT TO SECTION 7 OF THE CLH REPORT TEMPLATE] ............................................................................................................................................. 31 2.2.1 Summary of physical and chemical properties of the active substance ........................................... 31 2.2.1.1 Evaluation of physical hazards [equivalent to section 8 of the CLH report template] ............ 38 2.2.2 Summary of physical and chemical properties of the plant protection product .............................. 43 2.3 DATA ON APPLICATION AND EFFICACY .................................................................................................. 43 2.3.1 Summary of effectiveness ..............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid
    2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid IUPAC (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid name 2,4-D Other hedonal names trinoxol Identifiers CAS [94-75-7] number SMILES OC(COC1=CC=C(Cl)C=C1Cl)=O ChemSpider 1441 ID Properties Molecular C H Cl O formula 8 6 2 3 Molar mass 221.04 g mol−1 Appearance white to yellow powder Melting point 140.5 °C (413.5 K) Boiling 160 °C (0.4 mm Hg) point Solubility in 900 mg/L (25 °C) water Related compounds Related 2,4,5-T, Dichlorprop compounds Except where noted otherwise, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C, 100 kPa) 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) is a common systemic herbicide used in the control of broadleaf weeds. It is the most widely used herbicide in the world, and the third most commonly used in North America.[1] 2,4-D is also an important synthetic auxin, often used in laboratories for plant research and as a supplement in plant cell culture media such as MS medium. History 2,4-D was developed during World War II by a British team at Rothamsted Experimental Station, under the leadership of Judah Hirsch Quastel, aiming to increase crop yields for a nation at war.[citation needed] When it was commercially released in 1946, it became the first successful selective herbicide and allowed for greatly enhanced weed control in wheat, maize (corn), rice, and similar cereal grass crop, because it only kills dicots, leaving behind monocots. Mechanism of herbicide action 2,4-D is a synthetic auxin, which is a class of plant growth regulators.
    [Show full text]
  • Herbicide Mode of Action Table High Resistance Risk
    Herbicide Mode of Action Table High resistance risk Chemical family Active constituent (first registered trade name) GROUP 1 Inhibition of acetyl co-enzyme A carboxylase (ACC’ase inhibitors) clodinafop (Topik®), cyhalofop (Agixa®*, Barnstorm®), diclofop (Cheetah® Gold* Decision®*, Hoegrass®), Aryloxyphenoxy- fenoxaprop (Cheetah®, Gold*, Wildcat®), fluazifop propionates (FOPs) (Fusilade®), haloxyfop (Verdict®), propaquizafop (Shogun®), quizalofop (Targa®) Cyclohexanediones (DIMs) butroxydim (Factor®*), clethodim (Select®), profoxydim (Aura®), sethoxydim (Cheetah® Gold*, Decision®*), tralkoxydim (Achieve®) Phenylpyrazoles (DENs) pinoxaden (Axial®) GROUP 2 Inhibition of acetolactate synthase (ALS inhibitors), acetohydroxyacid synthase (AHAS) Imidazolinones (IMIs) imazamox (Intervix®*, Raptor®), imazapic (Bobcat I-Maxx®*, Flame®, Midas®*, OnDuty®*), imazapyr (Arsenal Xpress®*, Intervix®*, Lightning®*, Midas®* OnDuty®*), imazethapyr (Lightning®*, Spinnaker®) Pyrimidinyl–thio- bispyribac (Nominee®), pyrithiobac (Staple®) benzoates Sulfonylureas (SUs) azimsulfuron (Gulliver®), bensulfuron (Londax®), chlorsulfuron (Glean®), ethoxysulfuron (Hero®), foramsulfuron (Tribute®), halosulfuron (Sempra®), iodosulfuron (Hussar®), mesosulfuron (Atlantis®), metsulfuron (Ally®, Harmony®* M, Stinger®*, Trounce®*, Ultimate Brushweed®* Herbicide), prosulfuron (Casper®*), rimsulfuron (Titus®), sulfometuron (Oust®, Eucmix Pre Plant®*, Trimac Plus®*), sulfosulfuron (Monza®), thifensulfuron (Harmony®* M), triasulfuron (Logran®, Logran® B-Power®*), tribenuron (Express®),
    [Show full text]
  • INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES
    US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES Note: Pesticide tolerance information is updated in the Code of Federal Regulations on a weekly basis. EPA plans to update these indexes biannually. These indexes are current as of the date indicated in the pdf file. For the latest information on pesticide tolerances, please check the electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR) at http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_07/40cfrv23_07.html 1 40 CFR Type Family Common name CAS Number PC code 180.163 Acaricide bridged diphenyl Dicofol (1,1-Bis(chlorophenyl)-2,2,2-trichloroethanol) 115-32-2 10501 180.198 Acaricide phosphonate Trichlorfon 52-68-6 57901 180.259 Acaricide sulfite ester Propargite 2312-35-8 97601 180.446 Acaricide tetrazine Clofentezine 74115-24-5 125501 180.448 Acaricide thiazolidine Hexythiazox 78587-05-0 128849 180.517 Acaricide phenylpyrazole Fipronil 120068-37-3 129121 180.566 Acaricide pyrazole Fenpyroximate 134098-61-6 129131 180.572 Acaricide carbazate Bifenazate 149877-41-8 586 180.593 Acaricide unclassified Etoxazole 153233-91-1 107091 180.599 Acaricide unclassified Acequinocyl 57960-19-7 6329 180.341 Acaricide, fungicide dinitrophenol Dinocap (2, 4-Dinitro-6-octylphenyl crotonate and 2,6-dinitro-4- 39300-45-3 36001 octylphenyl crotonate} 180.111 Acaricide, insecticide organophosphorus Malathion 121-75-5 57701 180.182 Acaricide, insecticide cyclodiene Endosulfan 115-29-7 79401
    [Show full text]
  • Thickening Glyphosate Formulations
    (19) TZZ _T (11) EP 2 959 777 A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION (43) Date of publication: (51) Int Cl.: 30.12.2015 Bulletin 2015/53 A01N 57/20 (2006.01) A01N 25/30 (2006.01) A01P 13/00 (2006.01) (21) Application number: 15175726.7 (22) Date of filing: 17.08.2009 (84) Designated Contracting States: (71) Applicant: Akzo Nobel N.V. AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR 6824 BM Arnhem (NL) HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR (72) Inventor: ZHU, Shawn Stormville, NY New York 12582 (US) (30) Priority: 19.08.2008 US 90010 P 09.09.2008 EP 08163910 (74) Representative: Akzo Nobel IP Department Velperweg 76 (62) Document number(s) of the earlier application(s) in 6824 BM Arnhem (NL) accordance with Art. 76 EPC: 11191518.7 / 2 425 716 Remarks: 09781884.3 / 2 315 524 This application was filed on 07-07-2015 as a divisional application to the application mentioned under INID code 62. (54) THICKENING GLYPHOSATE FORMULATIONS (57) The present invention generally relates to a glyphosate formulation with enhanced viscosity, said formulation containing a thickening composition comprising at least one nitrogen- containing surfactant. EP 2 959 777 A1 Printed by Jouve, 75001 PARIS (FR) EP 2 959 777 A1 Description FIELD OF THE INVENTION 5 [0001] The present invention relates to a glyphosate formulations thickened by nitrogen containing surfactants. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0002] Glyphosate is the most widely used herbicide in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • AP-42, CH 9.2.2: Pesticide Application
    9.2.2PesticideApplication 9.2.2.1General1-2 Pesticidesaresubstancesormixturesusedtocontrolplantandanimallifeforthepurposesof increasingandimprovingagriculturalproduction,protectingpublichealthfrompest-bornediseaseand discomfort,reducingpropertydamagecausedbypests,andimprovingtheaestheticqualityofoutdoor orindoorsurroundings.Pesticidesareusedwidelyinagriculture,byhomeowners,byindustry,andby governmentagencies.Thelargestusageofchemicalswithpesticidalactivity,byweightof"active ingredient"(AI),isinagriculture.Agriculturalpesticidesareusedforcost-effectivecontrolofweeds, insects,mites,fungi,nematodes,andotherthreatstotheyield,quality,orsafetyoffood.Theannual U.S.usageofpesticideAIs(i.e.,insecticides,herbicides,andfungicides)isover800millionpounds. AiremissionsfrompesticideusearisebecauseofthevolatilenatureofmanyAIs,solvents, andotheradditivesusedinformulations,andofthedustynatureofsomeformulations.Mostmodern pesticidesareorganiccompounds.EmissionscanresultdirectlyduringapplicationorastheAIor solventvolatilizesovertimefromsoilandvegetation.Thisdiscussionwillfocusonemissionfactors forvolatilization.Thereareinsufficientdataavailableonparticulateemissionstopermitemission factordevelopment. 9.2.2.2ProcessDescription3-6 ApplicationMethods- Pesticideapplicationmethodsvaryaccordingtothetargetpestandtothecroporothervalue tobeprotected.Insomecases,thepesticideisapplieddirectlytothepest,andinotherstothehost plant.Instillothers,itisusedonthesoilorinanenclosedairspace.Pesticidemanufacturershave developedvariousformulationsofAIstomeetboththepestcontrolneedsandthepreferred
    [Show full text]
  • List of Herbicide Groups
    List of herbicides Group Scientific name Trade name clodinafop (Topik®), cyhalofop (Barnstorm®), diclofop (Cheetah® Gold*, Decision®*, Hoegrass®), fenoxaprop (Cheetah® Gold* , Wildcat®), A Aryloxyphenoxypropionates fluazifop (Fusilade®, Fusion®*), haloxyfop (Verdict®), propaquizafop (Shogun®), quizalofop (Targa®) butroxydim (Falcon®, Fusion®*), clethodim (Select®), profoxydim A Cyclohexanediones (Aura®), sethoxydim (Cheetah® Gold*, Decision®*), tralkoxydim (Achieve®) A Phenylpyrazoles pinoxaden (Axial®) azimsulfuron (Gulliver®), bensulfuron (Londax®), chlorsulfuron (Glean®), ethoxysulfuron (Hero®), foramsulfuron (Tribute®), halosulfuron (Sempra®), iodosulfuron (Hussar®), mesosulfuron (Atlantis®), metsulfuron (Ally®, Harmony®* M, Stinger®*, Trounce®*, B Sulfonylureas Ultimate Brushweed®* Herbicide), prosulfuron (Casper®*), rimsulfuron (Titus®), sulfometuron (Oust®, Eucmix Pre Plant®*), sulfosulfuron (Monza®), thifensulfuron (Harmony®* M), triasulfuron, (Logran®, Logran® B Power®*), tribenuron (Express®), trifloxysulfuron (Envoke®, Krismat®*) florasulam (Paradigm®*, Vortex®*, X-Pand®*), flumetsulam B Triazolopyrimidines (Broadstrike®), metosulam (Eclipse®), pyroxsulam (Crusader®Rexade®*) imazamox (Intervix®*, Raptor®,), imazapic (Bobcat I-Maxx®*, Flame®, Midas®*, OnDuty®*), imazapyr (Arsenal Xpress®*, Intervix®*, B Imidazolinones Lightning®*, Midas®*, OnDuty®*), imazethapyr (Lightning®*, Spinnaker®) B Pyrimidinylthiobenzoates bispyribac (Nominee®), pyrithiobac (Staple®) C Amides: propanil (Stam®) C Benzothiadiazinones: bentazone (Basagran®,
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Weed Control
    2014 North Carolina Agricultural Chemicals Manual The 2014 North Carolina Agricultural Chemicals Manual is published by the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, N.C. State University, Raleigh, N.C. These recommendations apply only to North Carolina. They may not be appropriate for conditions in other states and may not comply with laws and regulations outside North Carolina. These recommendations are current as of November 2013. Individuals who use agricultural chemicals are responsible for ensuring that the intended use complies with current regulations and conforms to the product label. Be sure to obtain current information about usage regulations and examine a current product label before applying any chemical. For assistance, contact your county Cooperative Extension agent. The use of brand names and any mention or listing of commercial products or services in this document does not imply endorsement by the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service nor discrimination against similar products or services not mentioned. VII — CHEMICAL WEED CONTROL 2014 North Carolina Agricultural Chemicals Manual VII — CHEMICAL WEED CONTROL Chemical Weed Control in Field Corn ...................................................................................................... 224 Weed Response to Preemergence Herbicides — Corn ........................................................................... 231 Weed Response to Postemergence Herbicides — Corn ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Weed Control in Rhubarb
    FACTSHEET 27/16 Soft Fruit Angela Huckle and Chris Creed, ADAS Weed control in rhubarb This factsheet collates recent research and current knowledge to provide growers with practical information on weed control in rhubarb plantations. Weed control in rhubarb and other perennial crops is becoming increasingly difficult with the current limited range of herbicide approvals (Figure 1). As a result of AHDB Horticulture-funded trials some new approaches have been developed, and new Extensions of Authorisation for Minor Use (EAMUs) for Sencorex Flow and Callisto have been obtained. Figure 1. Weed control in rhubarb is becoming increasingly difficult Action points • Choose planting sites carefully, free from perennial weeds • There is a short window for application of glyphosate during full rhubarb dormancy • Do not bring in weeds on sets • Alternate or tank-mix active ingredients from different • Apply residual herbicides prior to harvest, selected chemical groups where possible to guard against according to weed spectrum development of herbicide resistance. • Clean up plantations post-harvest by topping and applying contact herbicides such as inter-row diquat. Once dormant apply glyphosate Background Both projects evaluated a selection of newer herbicides for crop safety and efficacy against a range of problem weeds in Efficient and cost effective weed control is important in rhubarb, rhubarb plantations, compared to industry standards. as with other crops, to prevent yield loss caused by competition During the first project (SF 129), clomazone (Gamit 36CS) was for water, space and nutrients. The presence of weeds also approved for use on rhubarb (EAMU). Compared to standard impedes the harvest operation, leading to increased labour programmes, it was found to provide additional control of costs.
    [Show full text]
  • PESTICIDE SCREEN 07 Method: USDA R33D Rush Available 2X List
    PESTICIDE SCREEN 07 Method: USDA R33D Rush Available 2x list Acephate(Orthene) Cycluron Fenpropidin Acetamiprid Cymiazole (Hydrochloride) Fenpyroximate Alanycarb Cymoxanil Fenuron Aldicarb (Temic) Cyproconazole Fipronil Amidosulfuron Cyprodinil Flazasulfuron Aminocarb DEET Flonicamid Azaconazole Desmedipham Fluazinam Azamethiphos Diazinon Flubendiamide Azinphos‐ethyl Dichlorvos (DDVP) Fludioxonil Azinphos‐methyl (Gluthion) Diethofencarb Flufenacet Azoxystrobin Difenoconazole Flufenoxuron Beflubutamid Diflubenzuron Flumetsulam Benalaxyl Diflufenican Flumioxazin Benfuracarb Dimethachlor Fluometuron Benzoximate Dimethoate Fluopicolide Bifenazate Dimethomorph Fluoxastrobin Bitertanol Dimoxystrobin Fluquinconazole Boscalid (Nicobifen) Diniconazole Flusilazole Bromuconazole Dinotefuran Flutriafol Bupirimate Dioxacarb Foramsulfuron Byprofezin Disulfoton (Di‐Syston) Forchlorfenuron Butocarboxim Diuron Fosthiazate Carbaryl(Sevin) Epoxyconazole Furberidazole Carbendazim Ethidimuron Furalaxyl Carbofuran Ethion Furathiocarb Carbosulfan Ethirimol Halofenozide Carboxin Ethofumesate Halosulfuron‐methyl Carfentrazone‐ethyl Ethoprophos Hexaconazole Chlorantraniliprole Ethoxyquin Hexaflumuron Chlorfenvinphos Famoxadone Hexythiazox Chloridazon (Pyrazon) Fenamidone Imazalil Chlorotoluron Fenamiphos Imidacloprid Chloroxuron Fenarimol Indoxacarb Chlorsulfuron Fenazaquin Ipconazole Clethodim Fenbuconazole Iprovalicarb Clofentezine Fenhexamid Isocarbophos Clomazone Fenobucarb Isofenphos‐methyl Cyazofamid Fenoxycarb Isoprothiolane (Continued) Great Plains Analytical
    [Show full text]
  • IPCS IPCS International Programme on Chemical Safety International Programme on Chemical Safety
    and and Guidelines to Classification Guidelines to Classification 2000-2002 2000-2002 UNEP UNEP United Nations Environment Programme United Nations Environment Programme International Labour Organization International Labour Organization IPCS IPCS International Programme on Chemical Safety International Programme on Chemical Safety INTER-ORGANIZATION PROGRAMME FOR THE SOUND INTER-ORGANIZATION PROGRAMME FOR THE SOUND IOMC MANAGEMENT CHEMICALS IOMC MANAGEMENT CHEMICALS World Health Organization World Health Organization A cooperative agreement among UNEP, ILO, FAO, WHO, UNIDO, UNITAR & OECD World Health Organization A cooperative agreement among UNEP, ILO, FAO, WHO, UNIDO, UNITAR & OECD WHO/PCS/01.5 ENGLISH ONLY THE WHO RECOMMENDED CLASSIFICATION OF PESTICIDES BY HAZARD AND GUIDELINES TO CLASSIFICATION 2000-01 The WHO Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard was approved by the 28th World Health Assembly in 1975 and has since gained wide acceptance. When it was published in the WHO Chronicle, 29, 397-401 (1975), an annex, which was not part of the Classification, illustrated its use by listing examples of classification of some pesticidal active ingredients and their formulations. Later suggestions were made by Member States and pesticide registration authorities that further guidance should be given on the classification of individual pesticides. Guidelines were first issued in 1978, and have since been revised and reissued at 2-yearly intervals. The document is arranged as follows: Part I: The Classification as recommended by the World Health Assembly. This part is not subject to periodic review and the classification table and text can only be changed by resolution of the World Health Assembly. Part II: Guidelines to Classification. Individual products are classified in a series of tables, according to the oral or dermal toxicity of the technical product, and its physical state.
    [Show full text]
  • Reversing Resistance to Tembotrione in an Amaranthus Tuberculatus (Var
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications Agronomy and Horticulture Department 2017 Reversing resistance to tembotrione in an Amaranthus tuberculatus (var. rudis) population from Nebraska, USA with cytochrome P450 inhibitors Maxwel C. Oliveira University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Todd A. Gaines Colorado State University in Fort Collins, [email protected] Franck E. Dayan Colorado State University in Fort Collins, [email protected] Eric L. Patterson Colorado State University in Fort Collins, [email protected] Amit J. Jhala University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agronomyfacpub See nePxat pratge of for the addiAtiongraicl aulturuthors al Science Commons, Agriculture Commons, Agronomy and Crop Sciences Commons, Botany Commons, Horticulture Commons, Other Plant Sciences Commons, and the Plant Biology Commons Oliveira, Maxwel C.; Gaines, Todd A.; Dayan, Franck E.; Patterson, Eric L.; Jhala, Amit J.; and Knezevic, Stevan Z., "Reversing resistance to tembotrione in an Amaranthus tuberculatus (var. rudis) population from Nebraska, USA with cytochrome P450 inhibitors" (2017). Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications. 1045. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agronomyfacpub/1045 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Agronomy and Horticulture Department at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors Maxwel C. Oliveira, Todd A. Gaines, Franck E. Dayan, Eric L. Patterson, Amit J. Jhala, and Stevan Z. Knezevic This article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agronomyfacpub/ 1045 Oliviera et al.
    [Show full text]
  • A Corn and Soybean Herbicide Chart
    By Premix This chart lists premix herbicides alphabetically by their trade names Corn and Soybean so you can identify the premix’s component herbicides and their respective site of action groups. Refer to the Mode of Action chart on the left for more information. Herbicide Chart Component Premix Site of Action Trade Name ® Trade Name ® Active Ingredient Group Repeated use of herbicides with the same Anthem Zidua pyroxasulfone 15 Cadet fluthiacet-ethyl 14 site of action can result in the development of Autority Assist Spartan sulfentrazone 14 Pursuit imazethapyr 2 herbicide-resistant weed populations. Authority First Spartan sulfentrazone 14 FirstRate cloransulam 2 Autority MTZ Spartan sulfentrazone 14 Sencor metribuzin 5 By Mode of Action (effect on plant growth) Authority XL Spartan sulfentrazone 14 Classic chlorimuron 2 This chart groups herbicides by their modes of action to assist you in Autumn Super Autumn iodosulfuron 2 selecting herbicides 1) to maintain greater diversity in herbicide use and ------- thiencarbazone 2 Basis Blend Resolve rimsulfuron 2 2) to rotate among herbicides with different sites of action to delay the Harmony thifensulfuron 2 development of herbicide resistance. Bicep II Magnum Dual II Magnum s-metolachlor 15 (Bicep Lite II Mag) AAtrex atrazine 5 The Site of Action Group is a classification system developed by the Weed Science Society of America. Boundary Dual Magnum s-metolachlor 15 Sencor metribuzin 5 Breakfree ATZ Breakfree acetochlor 15 (Breakfree ATZ Lite) AAtrex atrazine 5 Number of resistant Bullet
    [Show full text]