(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,049,866 B2 Refardt Et Al

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,049,866 B2 Refardt Et Al USOO9049866B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,049,866 B2 Refardt et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jun. 9, 2015 (54) SYNERGISTIC HERBICIDAL COMBINATION (58) Field of Classification Search OF CLOMAZONE AND PETHOXAMD CPC ... A01N 43/80: A01N37/20: A01N 2300/00 USPC .......................... 504/138, 140,271, 342, 111 (75) Inventors: Matthias Refardt, Ettingen (CH): See application file for complete search history. Casper Reinhard Christensen, Holstebro (DK) (56) References Cited (73) Assignee: CHEMINOVA A/S, Lemvig (DK) U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS 4,405.357 A 9/1983 Chang (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 4,895,587 A * 1/1990 Kato et al. .................... 504,289 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 5,583,090 A 12/1996 Stern et al. U.S.C. 154(b) by 392 days. 5,597,780 A 1/1997 Lee et al. 2003, OO69137 A1 4/2003 Almsick et al. (21) Appl. No.: 12/991,499 FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS (22) PCT Filed: May 7, 2009 EP O 206251 12, 1986 (86). PCT No.: PCT/DK2O09/OOO 105 WO WO 2009115433 A2 * 9, 2009 S371 (c)(1), OTHER PUBLICATIONS (2), (4) Date: Nov. 11, 2010 Colby, S.R., "Calculating Synergistic and Antagonistic Responses of Herbicide Combinations'. Weed Science Society of America, vol. 15. (87) PCT Pub. No.: WO2009/135492 No. 1. (Jan. 1967), pp. 20-22. PCT Pub. Date: Nov. 12, 2009 * cited by examiner (65) Prior Publication Data Primary Examiner — John Pak US 2011 FOO59849 A1 Mar. 10, 2011 Assistant Examiner — Andriae M Holt (30) Foreign Application Priority Data (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm — Leydig, Voit & Mayer, Ltd. May 9, 2008 (DK) ................................. 2008 OO667 (57) ABSTRACT Presented are herbicidal compositions comprising as active (51) Int. Cl. ingredients clomaZone and pethoxamid. The combinations of AOIN 43/80 (2006.01) these herbicidal active compounds show a synergistic effect AOIN37/20 (2006.01) in the control of harmful plants. (52) U.S. Cl. CPC ...................................... A0IN 43/80 (2013.01) 19 Claims, No Drawings US 9,049,866 B2 1. 2 SYNERGISTC HERBICIDAL COMBINATION harmful plants are exposed to an effective amount of a syn OF CLOMAZONE AND PETHOXAMD ergistic combination of the compound A and the compound B. The present invention relates to herbicidal compositions In yet another embodiment, the invention relates to a her comprising as active ingredients the compound A which is bicidal composition comprising a herbicidal effective amount clomazone and the compound B which is pethoxamid. The of the compound A which is clomaZone and the compound B combinations of these active compounds show a synergistic which is pethoxamid. In a preferred embodiment the herbi effect in the control of harmful plants. The invention further cidal composition comprise a herbicidal effective amount of relates to a method for the control of harmful plants, such as the compound A and the compound B wherein the active weeds in crops of useful plants, and to the use of the herbicidal 10 components A and B are present in a synergistically effective compositions for that purpose. amount. The composition is preferably selected among those compositions comprising a form selected from the group BACKGROUND consisting of ready-to-use solutions, emulsifiable concen trates, emulsions, Suspensions, wettable powders, soluble The herbicidal active compound clomazone is known from 15 powders, granules, soluble granules, dispersible granules, U.S. Pat. No. 4,405.357 and is generally used to control microemulsions, microcapsule Suspensions and mixtures weeds in various crops. The herbicidal active compound thereof. pethoxamid is known from European patent application no. In a further embodiment, the invention relates to a method EP 206251-A1 and is generally used to control weeds in of reducing the Volatility of clomaZone, said method compris various crops such as control of grass weeds and broad-leaved ing combining clomaZone as compound A with a compound weeds. B which is pethoxamid, preferably in a herbicidal composi ClomaZone is known to be a very volatile organic com tion as described herein. Preferably the ratio between the pound to an extend so that clomaZone applied in a target area compounds A and B is in a ratio as to reduce the volatility of may move to adjacent areas and there cause discoloration, clomaZone on a comparative scale to an emulsifiable concen most typically whitening or some degree of bleaching, of a 25 trate composition comprising a similar amount of clomaZone variety of crops, trees, or decorative plants. While this bleach and without the compound B being present. Preferable com ing may be temporary when plants are exposed to Sufficiently pounds A and B are present in a herbicidal effective amount low concentrations, it is undesirable even when not causing but the compound B need not necessarily be present so as to the destruction of the affected plant. Accordingly appropriate produce a synergistic effect with the compound A. However, use instructions for clomaZone is often found on product 30 in a very preferred embodiment, the method of reducing the labels of commercially available clomaZone products and in Volatility of clomaZone comprise combining clomaZone as particular on emulsifiable concentrates formulations com compound A with a compound B which is pethoxamid, in a prising clomaZone in order to prevent exposure to clomaZone ratio as to reduce the volatility of the clomazone while main sensitive plants. Methods of reducing the volatility of cloma taining a synergistic herbicidal effect and without Substan Zone, i.e. to prevent or reduce vapor transfer of clomaZone to 35 tially sacrificing the overall herbicidal activity. Such ratios are plants which are not target of application, are proposed in preferably as herein described. Thus, the present invention U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,597,780 and 5,583,090 in which encapsula relates to a herbicidal composition having reduced cloma tion techniques are applied as to prepare microcapsule Sus Zone vapour transfer comprising a compound A which is pension formulations of clomaZone. clomaZone and a compound B which is pethoxamid and pref In crop protection products, it is always desirable to 40 erably the composition comprise a herbicidal effective increase the specific activity of an active ingredient and the amount of the compound A and the compound B wherein the reliability of action. It is an object of the present invention to active components A and B are present in a synergistically provide mixtures which comprise a compound A which is effective amount. Such ratios and amounts are preferably as clomaZone, and the compound B which is pethoxamid which herein described. are selective in crops to control undesirable harmful plants. 45 The compositions according to the invention can be Surprisingly, it has now been found that combinations of employed for the selective control of grasses and annual and these active compounds exhibits a synergistic effect when perennial monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous harmful used for the control of harmful plants. Further it has been plants the presence of useful plants such as maize, soya, peas, found that by combining clomaZone with pethoxamid the beans, Sunflowers, oilseed rape, Sugar cane, cassava, pump Volatile nature of clomaZone is significantly reduced. 50 kins, potatoes, vegetables and tobacco. Within the scope of this invention is also the control of such harmful plants found DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION among transgenic useful plants or among useful plants selected by classical means which are resistant to the active In one embodiment, the invention relates to a method for compounds A and B. Likewise, the compositions can be controlling harmful plants comprising exposing said harmful 55 employed for controlling undesirable harmful plants in plan plants to an effective amount of a combination of the com tation crops. Among harmful plants, e.g. weeds or Volunteer pound A which is clomaZone, and the compound B which is crop plants, that may be controlled are Ambrosia artemisiifo pethoxamid. In a preferred embodiment the harmful plants lia, Amaranthus retroflexus, Apera spica-venti, Capsella are exposed to an effective amount of a synergistic combina bursa-pastoris, Chenopodium album, Convolvulus arvensis, tion of the compound A and the compound B. 60 Digitaria ischaemum, Digitaria sanguinalis, Echinochloa In another embodiment, the invention relates to a method crus-galli, Galium aparine, Lamium purpureum, Matricaria for controlling harmful plants in the presence of useful plants spp., Mercurialis annua, Myosotis arvensis, Poa spp., comprising exposing said harmful plants and useful plants to Polygonum convolvulus, Polygonum persicaria, Portulaca an effective amount of a combination of the compound A oleracea, Senecio vulgaris, Setaria geniculata, Solanum which is clomaZone, and the compound B which is pethoxa 65 nigrum, Stellaria media, Veronica persica and Viola arvensis. mid, it being understood that the useful plants remain Compositions containing the active compounds A and B unharmed after the exposure. In a preferred embodiment the may be employed in any conventional form, for example, in US 9,049,866 B2 3 4 the form of a twin pack, or ready-to-use Solutions, emulsifi essential. Likewise, any form of combination of the active able concentrates, emulsions, Suspensions, wettable powders, components may be applied for either pre- or post-emergence soluble powders, granules, soluble granules, dispersible control of harmful plants, e.g. weeds in crops of useful plants. granules, microemulsions, microcapsule Suspensions e.g. Rates of application of the composition will vary according capsules comprising both active ingredients or present within 5 to prevailing conditions such as targeted weeds, degree of separate capsules; and mixtures thereof Such as a ZC, ZE or infestation, weather conditions, Soil conditions, crop species, ZW formulation. Such compositions can beformulated using mode of application, and application time. Compositions adjuvants and formulation techniques that are known in the containing the active compounds may be applied in the man art for individually formulating the herbicides.
Recommended publications
  • 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid
    2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid IUPAC (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid name 2,4-D Other hedonal names trinoxol Identifiers CAS [94-75-7] number SMILES OC(COC1=CC=C(Cl)C=C1Cl)=O ChemSpider 1441 ID Properties Molecular C H Cl O formula 8 6 2 3 Molar mass 221.04 g mol−1 Appearance white to yellow powder Melting point 140.5 °C (413.5 K) Boiling 160 °C (0.4 mm Hg) point Solubility in 900 mg/L (25 °C) water Related compounds Related 2,4,5-T, Dichlorprop compounds Except where noted otherwise, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C, 100 kPa) 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) is a common systemic herbicide used in the control of broadleaf weeds. It is the most widely used herbicide in the world, and the third most commonly used in North America.[1] 2,4-D is also an important synthetic auxin, often used in laboratories for plant research and as a supplement in plant cell culture media such as MS medium. History 2,4-D was developed during World War II by a British team at Rothamsted Experimental Station, under the leadership of Judah Hirsch Quastel, aiming to increase crop yields for a nation at war.[citation needed] When it was commercially released in 1946, it became the first successful selective herbicide and allowed for greatly enhanced weed control in wheat, maize (corn), rice, and similar cereal grass crop, because it only kills dicots, leaving behind monocots. Mechanism of herbicide action 2,4-D is a synthetic auxin, which is a class of plant growth regulators.
    [Show full text]
  • Herbicide Mode of Action Table High Resistance Risk
    Herbicide Mode of Action Table High resistance risk Chemical family Active constituent (first registered trade name) GROUP 1 Inhibition of acetyl co-enzyme A carboxylase (ACC’ase inhibitors) clodinafop (Topik®), cyhalofop (Agixa®*, Barnstorm®), diclofop (Cheetah® Gold* Decision®*, Hoegrass®), Aryloxyphenoxy- fenoxaprop (Cheetah®, Gold*, Wildcat®), fluazifop propionates (FOPs) (Fusilade®), haloxyfop (Verdict®), propaquizafop (Shogun®), quizalofop (Targa®) Cyclohexanediones (DIMs) butroxydim (Factor®*), clethodim (Select®), profoxydim (Aura®), sethoxydim (Cheetah® Gold*, Decision®*), tralkoxydim (Achieve®) Phenylpyrazoles (DENs) pinoxaden (Axial®) GROUP 2 Inhibition of acetolactate synthase (ALS inhibitors), acetohydroxyacid synthase (AHAS) Imidazolinones (IMIs) imazamox (Intervix®*, Raptor®), imazapic (Bobcat I-Maxx®*, Flame®, Midas®*, OnDuty®*), imazapyr (Arsenal Xpress®*, Intervix®*, Lightning®*, Midas®* OnDuty®*), imazethapyr (Lightning®*, Spinnaker®) Pyrimidinyl–thio- bispyribac (Nominee®), pyrithiobac (Staple®) benzoates Sulfonylureas (SUs) azimsulfuron (Gulliver®), bensulfuron (Londax®), chlorsulfuron (Glean®), ethoxysulfuron (Hero®), foramsulfuron (Tribute®), halosulfuron (Sempra®), iodosulfuron (Hussar®), mesosulfuron (Atlantis®), metsulfuron (Ally®, Harmony®* M, Stinger®*, Trounce®*, Ultimate Brushweed®* Herbicide), prosulfuron (Casper®*), rimsulfuron (Titus®), sulfometuron (Oust®, Eucmix Pre Plant®*, Trimac Plus®*), sulfosulfuron (Monza®), thifensulfuron (Harmony®* M), triasulfuron (Logran®, Logran® B-Power®*), tribenuron (Express®),
    [Show full text]
  • INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES
    US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES Note: Pesticide tolerance information is updated in the Code of Federal Regulations on a weekly basis. EPA plans to update these indexes biannually. These indexes are current as of the date indicated in the pdf file. For the latest information on pesticide tolerances, please check the electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR) at http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_07/40cfrv23_07.html 1 40 CFR Type Family Common name CAS Number PC code 180.163 Acaricide bridged diphenyl Dicofol (1,1-Bis(chlorophenyl)-2,2,2-trichloroethanol) 115-32-2 10501 180.198 Acaricide phosphonate Trichlorfon 52-68-6 57901 180.259 Acaricide sulfite ester Propargite 2312-35-8 97601 180.446 Acaricide tetrazine Clofentezine 74115-24-5 125501 180.448 Acaricide thiazolidine Hexythiazox 78587-05-0 128849 180.517 Acaricide phenylpyrazole Fipronil 120068-37-3 129121 180.566 Acaricide pyrazole Fenpyroximate 134098-61-6 129131 180.572 Acaricide carbazate Bifenazate 149877-41-8 586 180.593 Acaricide unclassified Etoxazole 153233-91-1 107091 180.599 Acaricide unclassified Acequinocyl 57960-19-7 6329 180.341 Acaricide, fungicide dinitrophenol Dinocap (2, 4-Dinitro-6-octylphenyl crotonate and 2,6-dinitro-4- 39300-45-3 36001 octylphenyl crotonate} 180.111 Acaricide, insecticide organophosphorus Malathion 121-75-5 57701 180.182 Acaricide, insecticide cyclodiene Endosulfan 115-29-7 79401
    [Show full text]
  • Thickening Glyphosate Formulations
    (19) TZZ _T (11) EP 2 959 777 A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION (43) Date of publication: (51) Int Cl.: 30.12.2015 Bulletin 2015/53 A01N 57/20 (2006.01) A01N 25/30 (2006.01) A01P 13/00 (2006.01) (21) Application number: 15175726.7 (22) Date of filing: 17.08.2009 (84) Designated Contracting States: (71) Applicant: Akzo Nobel N.V. AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR 6824 BM Arnhem (NL) HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR (72) Inventor: ZHU, Shawn Stormville, NY New York 12582 (US) (30) Priority: 19.08.2008 US 90010 P 09.09.2008 EP 08163910 (74) Representative: Akzo Nobel IP Department Velperweg 76 (62) Document number(s) of the earlier application(s) in 6824 BM Arnhem (NL) accordance with Art. 76 EPC: 11191518.7 / 2 425 716 Remarks: 09781884.3 / 2 315 524 This application was filed on 07-07-2015 as a divisional application to the application mentioned under INID code 62. (54) THICKENING GLYPHOSATE FORMULATIONS (57) The present invention generally relates to a glyphosate formulation with enhanced viscosity, said formulation containing a thickening composition comprising at least one nitrogen- containing surfactant. EP 2 959 777 A1 Printed by Jouve, 75001 PARIS (FR) EP 2 959 777 A1 Description FIELD OF THE INVENTION 5 [0001] The present invention relates to a glyphosate formulations thickened by nitrogen containing surfactants. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0002] Glyphosate is the most widely used herbicide in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • AP-42, CH 9.2.2: Pesticide Application
    9.2.2PesticideApplication 9.2.2.1General1-2 Pesticidesaresubstancesormixturesusedtocontrolplantandanimallifeforthepurposesof increasingandimprovingagriculturalproduction,protectingpublichealthfrompest-bornediseaseand discomfort,reducingpropertydamagecausedbypests,andimprovingtheaestheticqualityofoutdoor orindoorsurroundings.Pesticidesareusedwidelyinagriculture,byhomeowners,byindustry,andby governmentagencies.Thelargestusageofchemicalswithpesticidalactivity,byweightof"active ingredient"(AI),isinagriculture.Agriculturalpesticidesareusedforcost-effectivecontrolofweeds, insects,mites,fungi,nematodes,andotherthreatstotheyield,quality,orsafetyoffood.Theannual U.S.usageofpesticideAIs(i.e.,insecticides,herbicides,andfungicides)isover800millionpounds. AiremissionsfrompesticideusearisebecauseofthevolatilenatureofmanyAIs,solvents, andotheradditivesusedinformulations,andofthedustynatureofsomeformulations.Mostmodern pesticidesareorganiccompounds.EmissionscanresultdirectlyduringapplicationorastheAIor solventvolatilizesovertimefromsoilandvegetation.Thisdiscussionwillfocusonemissionfactors forvolatilization.Thereareinsufficientdataavailableonparticulateemissionstopermitemission factordevelopment. 9.2.2.2ProcessDescription3-6 ApplicationMethods- Pesticideapplicationmethodsvaryaccordingtothetargetpestandtothecroporothervalue tobeprotected.Insomecases,thepesticideisapplieddirectlytothepest,andinotherstothehost plant.Instillothers,itisusedonthesoilorinanenclosedairspace.Pesticidemanufacturershave developedvariousformulationsofAIstomeetboththepestcontrolneedsandthepreferred
    [Show full text]
  • Redox Imbalance Caused by Pesticides: a Review of OPENTOX-Related Research
    Marjanović Čermak AM, et al. Redox imbalance caused by pesticides Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 2018;69:126-134 126 Review DOI: 10.2478/aiht-2018-69-3105 Redox imbalance caused by pesticides: a review of OPENTOX-related research Ana Marija Marjanović Čermak, Ivan Pavičić, and Davor Želježić Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, Zagreb, Croatia [Received in February 2018; Similarity Check in February 2018; Accepted in May 2018] Pesticides are a highly diverse group of compounds and the most important chemical stressors in the environment. Mechanisms that could explain pesticide toxicity are constantly being studied and their interactions at the cellular level are often observed in well-controlled in vitro studies. Several pesticide groups have been found to impair the redox balance in the cell, but the mechanisms leading to oxidative stress for certain pesticides are only partly understood. As our scientific project “Organic pollutants in environment – markers and biomarkers of toxicity (OPENTOX)” is dedicated to studying toxic effects of selected insecticides and herbicides, this review is focused on reporting the knowledge regarding oxidative stress-related phenomena at the cellular level. We wanted to single out the most important facts relevant to the evaluation of our own findings from studies conducted onin vitro cell models. KEY WORDS: antioxidants; apoptosis; glyphosate; in vitro; neonicotinoids; organophosphates; oxidative stress; pyrethroids; reactive oxygen species Over the years, population growth and changes in food (HrZZ), is dedicated to studying the toxic effects of two consumption patterns have challenged agricultural major pesticide classes with three subgroups each: (A) production to meet the demand for food and quality insecticides (organophosphates, neonicotinoids, and standards.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Herbicide Groups
    List of herbicides Group Scientific name Trade name clodinafop (Topik®), cyhalofop (Barnstorm®), diclofop (Cheetah® Gold*, Decision®*, Hoegrass®), fenoxaprop (Cheetah® Gold* , Wildcat®), A Aryloxyphenoxypropionates fluazifop (Fusilade®, Fusion®*), haloxyfop (Verdict®), propaquizafop (Shogun®), quizalofop (Targa®) butroxydim (Falcon®, Fusion®*), clethodim (Select®), profoxydim A Cyclohexanediones (Aura®), sethoxydim (Cheetah® Gold*, Decision®*), tralkoxydim (Achieve®) A Phenylpyrazoles pinoxaden (Axial®) azimsulfuron (Gulliver®), bensulfuron (Londax®), chlorsulfuron (Glean®), ethoxysulfuron (Hero®), foramsulfuron (Tribute®), halosulfuron (Sempra®), iodosulfuron (Hussar®), mesosulfuron (Atlantis®), metsulfuron (Ally®, Harmony®* M, Stinger®*, Trounce®*, B Sulfonylureas Ultimate Brushweed®* Herbicide), prosulfuron (Casper®*), rimsulfuron (Titus®), sulfometuron (Oust®, Eucmix Pre Plant®*), sulfosulfuron (Monza®), thifensulfuron (Harmony®* M), triasulfuron, (Logran®, Logran® B Power®*), tribenuron (Express®), trifloxysulfuron (Envoke®, Krismat®*) florasulam (Paradigm®*, Vortex®*, X-Pand®*), flumetsulam B Triazolopyrimidines (Broadstrike®), metosulam (Eclipse®), pyroxsulam (Crusader®Rexade®*) imazamox (Intervix®*, Raptor®,), imazapic (Bobcat I-Maxx®*, Flame®, Midas®*, OnDuty®*), imazapyr (Arsenal Xpress®*, Intervix®*, B Imidazolinones Lightning®*, Midas®*, OnDuty®*), imazethapyr (Lightning®*, Spinnaker®) B Pyrimidinylthiobenzoates bispyribac (Nominee®), pyrithiobac (Staple®) C Amides: propanil (Stam®) C Benzothiadiazinones: bentazone (Basagran®,
    [Show full text]
  • US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs
    US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs Reregistration Eligibility Decision for Prometon March 25, 2008 United States Prevention, Pesticides EPA 738-R-08-004 Environmental Protection and Toxic Substances Agency (7508P) Reregistration Eligibility Decision for Prometon TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS............................................................................... 4 I. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 5 II. CHEMICAL OVERVIEW................................................................................................................ 6 A. REGULATORY HISTORY ................................................................................................................... 6 B. CHEMICAL IDENTIFICATION............................................................................................................. 6 C. USE PROFILE .................................................................................................................................... 7 D. ESTIMATED USAGE OF PESTICIDE.................................................................................................... 8 III. SUMMARY OF PROMETON RISK ASSESSMENTS............................................................. 9 A. HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................... 9 1. Toxicity of Prometon..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pesticide Contamination Prevention Program Report A.R.S
    Pesticide Contamination Prevention Program Report A.R.S. 49-303.C § The Arizona Pesticide Contamination Prevention Program was established by the Environmental Quality Act of 1986. The major objective of the program is to prevent or mitigate groundwater pollution by agricultural pesticides. The program is composed of the following four major components: 1) Product chemistry and environmental fate review – Prior to registering an agricultural-use pesticide with the Arizona Department of Agriculture (ADA), applicants must submit product chemistry and environmental fate data of the associated active ingredient to ADEQ for review and approval. The information is used to determine the potential of the active ingredient to leach to groundwater, and generate the Arizona Groundwater Protection List (GWPL). 2) Groundwater Protection List – The GWPL is a list of agricultural pesticides in use in Arizona and their active ingredients that have the potential to pollute groundwater, based on product chemistry and environmental fate data and groundwater monitoring of the active ingredient(s). 3) Environmental monitoring – ADEQ, in cooperation with the ADA, monitors groundwater and soils in agricultural areas throughout the state for the presence of agricultural-use pesticide active ingredients on the GWPL. 4) Compilation of data – ADEQ collects and reports product use information for agricultural pesticides applied to the soil on the GWPL. Results of pesticide monitoring for ground-water wells are evaluated and stored in the Water Quality Division’s groundwater database. This report which covers calendar year 2011 is in fulfillment of a requirement pursuant to A.R.S. § 49- 303.C that requires ADEQ to report the following information to the Legislature annually: 1) A list of agricultural-use pesticide active ingredient for which there is a groundwater protection data gap (A.R.S.
    [Show full text]
  • AP-42, Vol. 1, Final Background Document for Pesticide Application
    Emission Factor Documentation for AP-42 Section 9.2.2 Pesticide Application Final Report For U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Emission Inventory Branch EPA Contract No. 68-D2-0159 Work Assignment No. I-08 MRI Project No. 4601-08 September 1994 Emission Factor Documentation for AP-42 Section 9.2.2 Pesticide Application Final Report For U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Emission Inventory Branch Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Attn: Mr. Dallas Safriet (MD-14) Emission Factor and Methodology EPA Contract No. 68-D2-0159 Work Assignment No. I-08 MRI Project No. 4601-08 September 1994 NOTICE The information in this document has been funded wholly or in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under Contract No. 68-D2-0159 to Midwest Research Institute. It has been subjected to the Agency's peer and administrative review, and it has been approved for publication as an EPA document. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. iii iv PREFACE This report was prepared by Midwest Research Institute (MRI) for the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), under Contract No. 68-D2-0159, Assignment No. 005 and I-08. Mr. Dallas Safriet was the EPA work assignment manager for this project. Approved for: MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE Roy M. Neulicht Program Manager Environmental Engineering Department Jeff Shular Director, Environmental Engineering Department September 29, 1994 v vi CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ................................................ viii LIST OF TABLES ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Weed Control
    2014 North Carolina Agricultural Chemicals Manual The 2014 North Carolina Agricultural Chemicals Manual is published by the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, N.C. State University, Raleigh, N.C. These recommendations apply only to North Carolina. They may not be appropriate for conditions in other states and may not comply with laws and regulations outside North Carolina. These recommendations are current as of November 2013. Individuals who use agricultural chemicals are responsible for ensuring that the intended use complies with current regulations and conforms to the product label. Be sure to obtain current information about usage regulations and examine a current product label before applying any chemical. For assistance, contact your county Cooperative Extension agent. The use of brand names and any mention or listing of commercial products or services in this document does not imply endorsement by the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service nor discrimination against similar products or services not mentioned. VII — CHEMICAL WEED CONTROL 2014 North Carolina Agricultural Chemicals Manual VII — CHEMICAL WEED CONTROL Chemical Weed Control in Field Corn ...................................................................................................... 224 Weed Response to Preemergence Herbicides — Corn ........................................................................... 231 Weed Response to Postemergence Herbicides — Corn ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classification 2019 Theinternational Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) Was Established in 1980
    The WHO Recommended Classi cation of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classi cation 2019 cation Hazard of Pesticides by and Guidelines to Classi The WHO Recommended Classi The WHO Recommended Classi cation of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classi cation 2019 The WHO Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classification 2019 TheInternational Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) was established in 1980. The overall objectives of the IPCS are to establish the scientific basis for assessment of the risk to human health and the environment from exposure to chemicals, through international peer review processes, as a prerequisite for the promotion of chemical safety, and to provide technical assistance in strengthening national capacities for the sound management of chemicals. This publication was developed in the IOMC context. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views or stated policies of individual IOMC Participating Organizations. The Inter-Organization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals (IOMC) was established in 1995 following recommendations made by the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development to strengthen cooperation and increase international coordination in the field of chemical safety. The Participating Organizations are: FAO, ILO, UNDP, UNEP, UNIDO, UNITAR, WHO, World Bank and OECD. The purpose of the IOMC is to promote coordination of the policies and activities pursued by the Participating Organizations, jointly or separately, to achieve the sound management of chemicals in relation to human health and the environment. WHO recommended classification of pesticides by hazard and guidelines to classification, 2019 edition ISBN 978-92-4-000566-2 (electronic version) ISBN 978-92-4-000567-9 (print version) ISSN 1684-1042 © World Health Organization 2020 Some rights reserved.
    [Show full text]