A Study of Ulrich Zwingli's Sacramental Theology Carl M
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Olivet Nazarene University Digital Commons @ Olivet Faculty Scholarship – Theology Theology 1-20-1992 Signs and Providence: A Study of Ulrich Zwingli's Sacramental Theology Carl M. Leth Olivet Nazarene University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.olivet.edu/theo_facp Part of the Christianity Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Leth, Carl M., "Signs and Providence: A Study of Ulrich Zwingli's Sacramental Theology" (1992). Faculty Scholarship – Theology. 24. https://digitalcommons.olivet.edu/theo_facp/24 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theology at Digital Commons @ Olivet. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship – Theology by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Olivet. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SIGNS AND PROVIDENCE A STUDY OF ULRICH ZWINGLI'S SACRAMENTAL THEOLOGY by Carl M. Leth Department of Religion Duke University Date: Approved: David C. Steinmetz, Supervisor Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Religion in the Graduate School of Duke University 1992 ABSTRACT This dissertation considers the role of the doctrine of divine providence in the sacramental theology of Ulrich Zwingli. This is done by treating Zwingli in the context of his personal history, his broader sacramental thought, including his treatment of the Word and preaching, and his historical development in his writings on the Lord's Supper. The attempt is made to understand the personal importance of this doctrine for Zwingli and the way it functions within his theology of the sacraments. Each subject area and document is considered in the light of three questions. What is the relationship between human action and divine action? What is the relationship between Christ’s presence and the sacrament? What is the role and function of the sacrament? This study concludes that Zwingli’s affirmation of absolute providence consistently functions as a determinative principle in his sacramental theology, defining his foundational understanding of the sacraments and establishing the parameters of his sacramental thought. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Dr. David Steinmetz for his significant contribution to this dissertation and the course of study that led to it. His personal combination of scholarly excellence and personal kindness has been an encouraging example to me. I would also like to thank my congregation at the North Raleigh Church of the Nazarene for their persistent encouragement and support. This work would not have been realized without the ongoing personal support of my wife, Nancy, and the {sometimes reluctant) support of our children, Carl and Stephanie. I want to express my special appreciation to them. Finally, a large measure of thanks and appreciation are due to Clayton and Dorothy Barto who made this dissertation possible and to whom it is dedicated. TABLE OF CONTEiNTS CHAPTER A cknow ledgm ents...................................................................................................... j 1. In tro d u ctio n ........................................................................................................ 1 2. Z w ingli's Early D evelopm ent ..................................................................... 14 3. Early W ritin g s.................................................................................................... 3 3 4. The W ord.............................................................................................................. 5 4 5 . B ap tism .................................................................................................................. 7 7 6 . Zwingli in Mid-Career ................................................................................... 102 7. Sacram ental C ontroversy.............................................................................. 127 8 . M a rb u rg ................................................................................................................ 154 9. M arburg to K ap p el............................................................................................ 1 8 0 10. C on clu sio n ........................................................................................................ 202 Bibliography............................................................................................................... 210 if CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION The thesis of this dissertation is that Zwingli's understanding of providence plays a determinative role in the development of Zwingli's sacramental theology. His emphatic affirmation of the absolute character of divine providence is the central issue at stake in the sacramental controversies with Luther, the Anabaptists and the Catholic teaching on the sacraments. Considered in the context of this ongoing debate On Providence is revealed as an essentially sacramental work presenting the theological and philosophical foundations which underlie Zwingli’s sacramental understanding. Consideration of other influences (i.e. humanism) and issues (i.e. development or change in his thought) are not made irrelevant by this central affirmation, but they take place within the unchanging parameters established by it. Zwingli's foundational understanding of the role of divine providence sets the non-negotiable outline within which he works. Understanding this central ordering principle in Zwingli’s sacramental thought wili serve to clarify other issues in it and makes easily understandable the unreconcilable breach with Luther, Despite a significant body of scholarship and renewred attention in recent years, Ulrich Zwingh remains an enigma, A consensus has not yet been reached regarding the essential character of Zwingli's theology or theological system. Significant debate is ongoing with respect to many areas of his life and thought. 1 The degree of his dependence upon Luther, Erasmus, humanism, medieval scholasticism, patristic and ancient secular sources remain areas of disagreement. Characterizations of the core, or determinative center, of his thought range widely and are not only significantly different, but even contradictory. "Zwingli is in turn reformer or rationalist, humanist or spiritualist, politician or preacher."1 This is also true in consideration of Zwingli's sacramental, and specifically eucharistic, theology. Since this dissertation proposes to reconsider Zwir.gii's sacramental thought it will be helpful to review the range of scholarship regarding our subject. We want to briefly consider three aspects of scholarly opinion. First, we will consider the major interpretations of the essential, or determinative, elements of Zwingli”s thought. Second, we want to review interpretations of the presence of Christ in the Supper in Zwingli’s thought. This will include the issue of development or change in Zwingli's sacramental views. Thirdly, we propose to consider the treatment of the issue of providence in the context of Zwingli's sacramental thought and, specifically, how On Providence is treated. Any treatment of this subject area would have to begin with Walther Kohler. His magisterial two volume Zwingli und Luther remains the standard work on the Sacramental Controversy.2 For Kohler, Zwingli ir. a humanist reformer whose >W.P. Stephens, The Theology ofHuldreich Zwingli, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 19S6), 2. 2Walther Kohler, Zwingli untl Luther, 2 vol. Vol. I. Die religiose und politische Enrwicklung bis zum Marburger Religionsgesprach 1529. (Leipzig, 1924), Vol.II. Vom Beginn der Marburger Verkandhmgen 1529 bis zum Abschiufi der W'utemberger Konkordie von 1536, (Gutersioh: Bertelsmann Verlag, 1953). See also Die Ceistewelr Ulrich Zwinglis: Christentum und Antike, (Go.he: Verlag Friedrich Andreas Perthes, 1920), and Huidrych Zwingli (Stuttgart: K.F.Kcehler Verlag, 1952). theology remains shaped by Zwingli's foundational understanding from the perspective of an Erasmian humanism. The key to understanding Zwingli and the core of the controversy with Luther is bound up in the humanist perspective, which includes the scholastic foundations from which it develops, and the more essentially biblical Lutheran view rooted in the late medieval nominalist foundations from which Luther works.3 While the influence of Erasmus and humanism continues to be acknowledged as an important element of Zwingli's development and thought, it is not generally regarded as the interpretive key to understanding Zwingli. However, notable proponents continue to advocate this view. Stefan Bosshard presents an important wrork, Zwingli - Erasmus - Cajetan, in which he argues for the enduring influence of Erasmus on Zwingli's understanding of the Eucharist.1 Christof Gestrich also argues for the determinative influence of humanism (following Fritz Blanke) understanding that influence in terms cf a severe dualism of spirit and matter,5 This leads to the characterization of Zwingli in terms of a pronounced 3Alister McGrath provides a helpful study into the reformation traditions and their medieval roots in The Intellectual Origins o f the European Reformation, (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987). 4Stefan Niklaus Bosshard, Zwingli - Erasmus - Cajetan: Die Eucharistie als Zeichen der Einheit, (Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1978). sChristof Gestrich, Zwingli als Theologe - Glaube und Geist beim Ziircher Refonnator, (Zurich: Zwingli Veriag,