Afghanistan's Agromet Bulltetin for the Month of January 2006
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Data Source: Agromet Network, AMA,FAO, USGS Page 1 Summary In the South Western region most of the Comparison of January 2006 NDVI to the same month of wheatfields are in emerging stage (crop has germi- 2005 shows large increase of NDVI in Southeast region, nated and seedling have emerged with average some parts of Central mountainous areas (Urazgan and height dose not exceed 10cm/4’) in the Greshk, Ghor) and small increase of NDVI occurred in some Nawa, Nadali districts and Lashkargah center of parts of mentioned areas than the month of January Hilmand province and Farah and Kandahar prov- 2005. inces. Temperature was below zero across the coun- In the East Central region adverse factor is try during the month of January 2006 such as late planting such as in Bamyan Province. Bamyan which had experienced the lowest temperature during this month. Crop Phenological Stages In the East Central region the crop stage In the Western region most of the wheat fields range (depending of the respective planting dates) are in emerging stage (crop has germinated and is at the emerging stage (crop has germinated and seedling have emerged with average height dose seedling have emerged with average height dose not exceed 10cm/4’) for Qalai-new center of Badghis not exceed 10cm/4’) as in Yakawlang district and province, but also for Maqur and Mughab districts surrounding Bamyan areas for the winter wheat. of Badghis province the crop stages are in the emerging stage (crop has germinated and seedling In the Eastern region most of the wheat fields have emerged but average height dose not exceed are in vegetative stage (Plants are more than 10cm/4’). 10cm/4 “) as in Laghman province. In the South Western region most of the In the North Eastern region most of the wheat fields are in emerging stage (crop has germi- wheat fields are in emerging stage (crop has ger- nated and seedling have emerged with average minated and seedling have emerged but average height dose not exceed 10cm/4’) for the Greshk, height dose not exceed 10cm/4’) in Faizabad center Nawa, Nadali districts and Lashkargah center of of Badakhshan province and surrounding wheat Hilmand province, Farah and Kandahar provinces. fields. In the North region the crop is in emerging stage (crop has germi- nated and seedling have emerged but average height dose not exceed 10cm/4’) as Jawzjan , Maimana cen- ter of Faryab province , Takhtapul areas and surrounding Mazar shrif center of Balkh province. In the Central region In Sya Gerd area of Parwan province the Map 1 wheat crop is in vegetative stage (plants are more than 10cm/4 “). Data Source: Agromet Network, AMA,FAO, USGS Page 2 Crop Conditions For the South Western region including For the northeastern region the crop condi- Farah , Hilmand , Zabul and Kandahar provinces tion is normal same as Badakhshan province. the crop condition is normal . For the north region the crop condition is nor- In the Western region the crop condition is mal same as Faryab, Balkh and Jawzjan provinces. normal for the Chaghcharan center of Ghor province and Qalai new center of Badghis province but poor crop con- dition is observed in Maqur areas of Ghor province. For the Central region the crop condition is normal in Sya Gerd dis- trict of Parwan province. For the east Central region the crop condition is normal in Bamyan province. Map 2 For the eastern region the crop condition is normal in Laghman prov- ince. Adverse Factors Since we are in early stage of our Agri- During the month of January 2006 the observed cultural season and most parts of the ag- temperature was above normal which might in- ricultural lands all over the country is crease the number of adverse factors in the Agri- covered by snow so, there is cultural lands quickly during the coming season. no crop plants on the ground and we can not measure and determine adverse factors in the agricultural lands. In the east central region adverse factor is late planting same as in Bamyan Province. Map 3 In the Western region adverse factor is lack of rain or less rain as Maqur district of Badghis province. This year we are having unexpected and abnormal high temperature Data Source: Agromet Network, AMA,FAO, USGS Page 3 Rainfall situation Comparison of January 2006 rainfall data to the In Kabul + 160 %, Darulaman + 1 %, Paghman +77 same month of 2005 shows increase of rainfall in %, Kariz Mir +60 %, Jabulseraj +4 %, Faizabad most parts of the country in 2006, except Jalalabad, +335 %, Kunduz +19 %, Mazar + 353 %, Ghaziabad, Sarobi in the east and Maimana in the Sheberghan + 76 %, Murghab + 18 %, Jalalabad Northeast .The percentage of rainfall increase re- +64 %, Ghaziabad +102 %, Gardiz + 49 %, Ghazni corded at the in the most of our stations is as fol- +30 %, Kandahar + 32 %, Farah + 6 %, Herat + 34 lows: %. In the remaining, stations the rainfall has de- creased during the month of January 2006 and felt In Kabul +96 %, Darulaman + 37 %, Paghman +113 below average as follows: %, Kariz Mir +14 %, Jabulseraj +258 %,Faizabad +220 %, Taluqan + 12 %, Kunduz +163 %, Mazar + In Taluqan -46 %, Sarobi – 8 %, Maimana -53 % 14 %, Sheberghan + 233 %, Sri Pul + 49 %, and Logar -8 %. Murghab + 715 %, Logar + 54 %, Gardiz + 111 %, Ghazni +442 %, Kanda- har + 68 %, Farah + 1075 %, and Herat + Map 4 259 %. The stations which had experienced decrease in rainfall during the month of January 2006 in comariosn to the same month of 2005 are as follows: Jalalabad – 59 %, Ghaziabad -65 %, Sarobi – 65 % and Maimana -59 % which Maimana had dramatically decrease Map 4 than neighboring sta- tions. Comparison of January 2006 rainfall data to the same month of long term average shows that the rainfall is above the long term average in January 2006 in most parts of the Map 5 country. Which the rain fall increase in percent- age is as fallows: Map 5 Data Source: Agromet Network, AMA,FAO, USGS Page 4 Rainfall Graphs Comparison of Actual and Last year Rainfall (January 2006) Chart 1 240 -88% 210 213 220% 197 180 -65% 715% 163 163 14 150 m 131 133% 233% 120 115 110 259% 96% 12% Rainfall in m in Rainfall 442% -59% 85.9 14% 49% 90 258% 68% 82 75 1075%111% 66.5 65 68 68.4 -59% 71.9 65 37% 61.5 60 60 72 163 54% 43.9 52.5 54.8 58 41.1 47.2 57 55.2 28.5 26 30 30 38.8 32 11.8 23.5 22.5 23.3 28.3 20 21.6 2 18.5 19 20 20.8 4.3 0 d i d j d an an ul l zn at uz ar P Sera az i Am Farah ha Her laba Kabul uqan l Gardiz G a Logar M Sar obi Bagh u ul Kund Sar Tal Faiz Aba ab Jal KandaharKariz Mir Maimana MurghabPaghman Ghaziaba J Dar Sheberghan Actual rainfall Rainfall Last Year Comparison of Actual and long term average Rainfall (January 2006) Chart 2 250 220 335% 19 7. 5 190 160 353% 13 1 77% 130 18% 110 10 3 160% -8% -46% 100 85.9 60% 89 1% 49% 30% 4% 32% 87 76% 28% 77.8 75 72.6 34 68 19% -53% 6 66.5 64% 65 71.9 70 60 60 82 65 102% 65.3 52.5 -8% 62.1 57 45.4 49.1 46.9 47.9 41.1 41.1 40.4 28.3 34.8 26 49.6 33.1 44.4 40 44.2 46.1 40.8 40.5 28.9 32 22.5 22.2 23.5 12 . 9 17. 3 10 n i d j r l n a ad h iz n a t a d ul a ir z r a r b n n i u n la a d z b ra r ba h M u m a n a a a a b P a h m b r r a a e e a ab a d e g a z h m h ro i q g A A a a h i H S l d iz n h o m a g h rg a r lu a l iz F G z l la K n r u s L i M r g e S a a B u a G a u a a a K e a u a b S T r F h b J K K K M M P e a G a h D J S Actual rainfall Long term average Data Source: Agromet Network, AMA,FAO, USGS Page 5 Temperature for the month of January 2006 Comparison Average Temperature(C° ) of January 2006 to same Month of 2005 Chart 3 20.0 15.0 10.6 10.0 8.3 7.9 6.9 7.2 5.5 5.8 5.1 5.3 4.9 5.0 5.0 2.7 3.7 2.2 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.0 -0.8-0.5 -0.3 -0.5-0.1 -1.1 -0.8 -1.3 -1.4 -1.9 -1.9 -1 Hirat -1.5 -1.8 Aibak Kabul -2.2 Farah Logar -2.4 Khost -2.4 Cheep Gardiz -3 Ghazni -3.0 Qargha Kapisa Sari Pul Kunduz Taluqan -2.9 Baghlan Bamyan -2.9 Uruzgan Jawzjan Jawzjan Faizabad -4 Laghman -3.9 Paghman Jalalabad -4.0 -3.9 Kandahar Jabulsaraj -5.0 Asad Abad Darulaman -3.3 Ghazi Abad -4.3 -4.3 Badam Bagh Badam -4.9 -5.3 -5.4 -5.4-4.9 -4.6 -5.8 -5.9 -7.9 -8.8 -10.0 -11.8 -15.0 -20.0 Jan Avg 2006 Jan avg 2005 Comparison of monthly average temperature of January 2006 to the same month of 2005 clearly shows the lower temperature during the month of January 2006 than that of 2005 During the month of January 2006 Northeast re- the same month of 2005 (chart 3 ) clearly shows gions, North, Northwest, Central Highlands and lower temperature during the month of January Hindokosh areas experienced cold air mass which 2006 than that of 2005.