DOCSLIB.ORG

The Roman Republic and Empire Technological Innovations, and Goods

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

wh07_te_ch01ca_s02_s.fm Page 20 Friday, October 7, 2005 11:55 AM wh07_se_ch01ca_S02_s.fm Page 20 Tuesday, July 12, 2005 3:04 PM Standards-Based SECTION Instruction 2 WITNESS HISTORY AUDIO Augustus Becomes Emperor Cornelius Tacitus, a Roman historian, was known for his critical Standards-at-a-Glance characterizations of Roman emperors. Here he describes how • History-Social Science 2 the first emperor, Augustus Caesar, achieved that position: Students have learned about how the Greek “ Augustus won over the soldiers with gifts, the populace with philosophers viewed the law. Now they will cheap grain, and all men with the sweets of repose, and so learn the Roman views of law and identify grew greater by degrees, while he concentrated in himself the components of Greco-Roman civilization. the functions of the Senate, the magistrates, and the laws. Augustus Caesar, Emperor He was wholly unopposed, for the boldest spirits had fallen of Rome in marble and in • Analysis Skills in battle, . CS3 Students use a variety of maps and ivory cameo (above) ” documents to interpret human movement, Focus Question How did the government of Rome develop including major patterns of domestic and into an empire? international migration, changing environmental preferences and settlement patterns, the frictions that develop between population groups, and the diffusion of ideas, The Roman Republic and Empire technological innovations, and goods. • English-Language Arts Writing 2.4 Standards Preview Rome began as a small city-state in Italy but ended up ruling the entire Mediterranean world. In the process the Romans estab- H-SS 10.1.1 Analyze the similarities and differences in lished traditions of government that continue to influence the Judeo-Christian and Greco-Roman views of law, reason and faith, and duties of the individual. modern world. The story of Roman success starts with the geogra- Prepare to Read H-SS 10.1.2 Trace the development of Western political phy of Italy. The Italian peninsula looks like a boot jutting into ideas of the rule of law and illegitimacy of tyranny, using the Mediterranean Sea. The peninsula is centrally located in the Build Background Knowledge L3 selections from Plato’s Republic and Aristotle’s Politics. Mediterranean, and the city of Rome is in the center of Italy. That Ask students what they know about how location helped the Romans as they expanded, first in Italy and ancient Rome was governed. If needed, Terms, People, and Places then into lands around the Mediterranean. have them preview the headings. republic Carthage consul Julius Caesar dictator Augustus Caesar Establishing a Republic L3 Set a Purpose tribune Justinian Because of its geography, Italy was much easier to unify than ■ WITNESS HISTORY Read the selection veto Greece. Unlike Greece, Italy is not broken up into small, isolated aloud or play the audio. valleys. Its mountains, which run like a backbone down the length of the peninsula, are less rugged than the mountains of Greece. AUDIO Witness History Audio CD, Reading Skill: Understand Effects Use a chart Augustus Becomes Emperor like the one below to record the effects of changes Finally, Italy has the advantage of broad, fertile plains, both in the in Rome’s government. north, under the shadow of the towering Alps, and in the west, Do you think Tacitus approved of where the Romans settled. Farms in these plains supported a Rome’s becoming an empire? (Prob- growing population. ably not—he seemed to despise the first From Monarchy to Republic emperor, and he was critical of other Effects Etruscan Rule The ancestors of the Romans migrated into Italy by about 800 B.C. They settled along the Tiber River in small vil- emperors.) • • lages scattered over seven low-lying hills. There they herded and ■ • Focus Point out the Section Focus • farmed. Their villages would in time grow into Rome, the city on Question and write it on the board. seven hills. Tell students to refer to this question The Romans shared the Italian peninsula with other peoples. as they read. (Answer appears with Among them were Greek colonists, whose city-states dotted southern Section 2 Assessment answers.) Italy, and the Etruscans, who lived north of Rome. For a time, the ■ Preview Have students preview the Section Standards and the list of Terms, People, and Places. Vocabulary Builder ■ Have students read this section using the Guided Questioning Use the information below and the following resources to teach the high-use word from this section. strategy (TE, p. T20). As they read, Teaching Resources, Unit 1, p. 7; Teaching Resources, Skills Handbook, p. 3 have students fill in the chart describing High-Use Word Definition and Sample Sentence the shift from monarchy to republic. commodity, p. 25 n. any article that is bought and sold Reading and Note Taking Silk is a commodity that people have valued since ancient times. Study Guide, p. 8 20 Sources of the Democratic Tradition wh07_se_ch01ca_S02_s.fmwh07_te_ch01ca_s02_s.fm Page 21 Page Sunday, 21 July Friday, 24, 2005 October 12:26 PM7, 2005 11:55 AM Etruscans ruled much of central Italy, including Rome itself. An aristocracy of nobles, led by a king, controlled each Etruscan city-state. Teach A New Government The Romans drove out the Etruscans in 509 B.C. They set up a new government in which the people chose some officials. Establishing a They called it a republic, or “thing of the people.” A republic, Romans thought, would keep any individual from gaining too much power. Republic H-SS 10.1.1 L3 In the early republic, the most powerful governing body was the sen- Instruct ate. Its 300 members were all patricians, meaning they belonged to the landholding upper class. Senators, who served for life, made the laws. ■ Introduce: Key Terms Have stu- Each year, the senators elected two consuls from among the patricians. dents find the term republic (in blue) The consuls supervised the business of government and commanded in the text and explain its meaning. Rome’s armies. Consuls, however, could serve only one term. Also, they Ask How does a republic differ had to consult with the senate on major issues. By limiting the consuls’ from a monarchy or an aristocracy time in office and making them responsible to the senate, Rome had a of nobles? (People do not choose a system of checks on the power of government. The Roman Forum monarch or members of an aristocracy.) In the event of war, the senate might choose a dictator, or ruler who The Roman Forum (below) was a collection Is everyone in a republic consid- has complete control over a government. The law granted each Roman of buildings that stood at the heart of ered equal? (Not necessarily; the ple- dictator the power to rule for six months. Then he had to give up power. ancient Rome. Buildings included temples, beians in Rome had much less power Romans admired Cincinnatus as a model dictator. Cincinnatus organized monuments, and the Curia—the meeting place of the Roman Senate. The Twelve than the patricians, for example.) an army, led the Romans to victory over an attacking enemy, attended Tables (inset) were displayed in the Forum ■ Teach Explain that after the Romans victory celebrations, and returned to his farmlands—all within 16 days. so that everyone would know what the laws were. overthrew the Etruscan monarch, more Common People Demand Equality The common people, or plebe- than 60 years passed before the rights ians, made up the bulk of the Roman population. Yet they had little influ- of the common people significantly ence on government. The efforts of these farmers, merchants, artisans, improved. Ask How did the Laws of and traders to gain power shaped politics in the early republic. the Twelve Tables help the plebe- The plebeians’ first breakthrough came in 450 B.C., when the govern- ians? (It gave them the right to appeal ment had the laws of Rome inscribed on 12 tablets and set up in the Forum, or marketplace. Plebeians had protested that citizens could not a judgment handed down by a patri- know what the laws were, because they were not written down. The cian judge.) How did the tribunes Laws of the Twelve Tables made it possible serve as a check on the power of for the first time for plebeians to appeal a government? (They could veto laws judgment by a patrician judge. that might be harmful to the plebeians.) Over time, the plebeians gained the ■ Quick Activity Invite the class to right to elect their own officials, called debate the Roman senate’s practice of tribunes, to protect their interests. The appointing a dictator in times of crisis. tribunes could veto, or block, laws harm- Encourage students to support their ful to plebeians. Little by little, Rome’s opinions with reasoned argument. You common people forced the senate to might extend the debate by asking choose plebeians as consuls and finally to open the senate itself to plebeians. whether this practice should ever be used in the present-day United States. A Lasting Legacy Although the senate still dominated the government, the com- mon people had gained access to power and won safeguards for their rights with- out having to resort to war or revolution. More than 2,000 years later, the framers of the United States Constitution would adapt such Roman ideas as the senate, the veto, and checks on power. Standards Check How did the Roman Republic differ from government under the Etruscans? H-SS 10.1.1 Solutions for All Learners Answer L1 Special Needs L2 Less Proficient Readers L2 English Language Learners Have students scan this page to find nouns that name Use the following resources to help students acquire Under the Etruscans, a group of nobles, led by Romans who held different levels of power in the basic skills.
Recommended publications
  • Livy's View of the Roman National Character

    Livy's View of the Roman National Character

    James Luce, December 5th, 1993 Livy's View of the Roman National Character As early as 1663, Francis Pope named his plantation, in what would later become Washington, DC, "Rome" and renamed Goose Creek "Tiber", a local hill "Capitolium", an example of the way in which the colonists would draw upon ancient Rome for names, architecture and ideas. The founding fathers often called America "the New Rome", a place where, as Charles Lee said to Patrick Henry, Roman republican ideals were being realized. The Roman historian Livy (Titus Livius, 59 BC-AD 17) lived at the juncture of the breakdown of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman Empire. His 142 book History of Rome from 753 to 9 BC (35 books now extant, the rest epitomes) was one of the most read Latin authors by early American colonists, partly because he wrote about the Roman national character and his unique view of how that character was formed. "National character" is no longer considered a valid term, nations may not really have specific national characters, but many think they do. The ancients believed states or peoples had a national character and that it arose one of 3 ways: 1) innate/racial: Aristotle believed that all non-Greeks were barbarous and suited to be slaves; Romans believed that Carthaginians were perfidious. 2) influence of geography/climate: e.g., that Northern tribes were vigorous but dumb 3) influence of institutions and national norms based on political and family life. The Greek historian Polybios believed that Roman institutions (e.g., division of government into senate, assemblies and magistrates, each with its own powers) made the Romans great, and the architects of the American constitution read this with especial care and interest.
  • ROMAN REPUBLICAN CAVALRY TACTICS in the 3Rd-2Nd

    ROMAN REPUBLICAN CAVALRY TACTICS in the 3Rd-2Nd

    ACTA MARISIENSIS. SERIA HISTORIA Vol. 2 (2020) ISSN (Print) 2668-9545 ISSN (Online) 2668-9715 DOI: 10.2478/amsh-2020-0008 “BELLATOR EQUUS”. ROMAN REPUBLICAN CAVALRY TACTICS IN THE 3rd-2nd CENTURIES BC Fábián István Abstact One of the most interesting periods in the history of the Roman cavalry were the Punic wars. Many historians believe that during these conflicts the ill fame of the Roman cavalry was founded but, as it can be observed it was not the determination that lacked. The main issue is the presence of the political factor who decided in the main battles of this conflict. The present paper has as aim to outline a few aspects of how the Roman mid-republican cavalry met these odds and how they tried to incline the balance in their favor. Keywords: Republic; cavalry; Hannibal; battle; tactics The main role of a well performing cavalry is to disrupt an infantry formation and harm the enemy’s cavalry units. From this perspective the Roman cavalry, especially the middle Republican one, performed well by employing tactics “if not uniquely Roman, were quite distinct from the normal tactics of many other ancient Mediterranean cavalry forces. The Roman predilection to shock actions against infantry may have been shared by some contemporary cavalry forces, but their preference for stationary hand-to-hand or dismounted combat against enemy cavalry was almost unique to them”.1 The main problem is that there are no major sources concerning this period except for Polibyus and Titus Livius. The first may come as more reliable for two reasons: he used first-hand information from the witnesses of the conflicts between 220-167 and ”furthermore Polybius’ account is particularly valuable because he had serves as hypparch in Achaea and clearly had interest and aptitude in analyzing military affairs”2.
  • Read Book Cicero and the Roman Republic 1St Edition

    Read Book Cicero and the Roman Republic 1St Edition

    CICERO AND THE ROMAN REPUBLIC 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK John Murrell | 9780521691161 | | | | | Cicero and the Roman Republic 1st edition PDF Book Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. Add to Basket Used Softcover. Cicero, who himself was a prolific writer on philosophy and politics praises the idea of not just a philosopher king, but philosopher leadership in general, and advocates that intellectuals get involved in politics rather than shun it. Many believed he had participated in several murders. Yet, what we do have is simply stunning, a perfect Latinization, Romanization, and republicanization of Socratic ideals and ethics. In this "mixed state," he argued, royalty, the best men, and the common people all should have a role. Indeed, when he denounced the latter in a number of orations called the Philippics, Mark Antony had him murdered. Soon, his skills as an orator made Cicero the leading court advocate in Rome. These afford a revelation of the man all the more striking because most were not written for publication. Views Read Edit View history. For Further Reading Everitt, Anthony. Instead of a king, the republic installed two "consuls" to rule. This new selection of speeches illustrates Cicero's fierce loyalty to the Roman Republic, giving an overview of his oratory from early victories in the law courts to the height of his political career in the Senate. About this Item: Hackett Publishing, By refusing to join this alliance, Cicero left himself vulnerable to attacks from his political enemies. Each consul could veto an act of the other.
  • Former Political Prisoners and Exiles in the Roman Revolution of 1848

    Former Political Prisoners and Exiles in the Roman Revolution of 1848

    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1989 Between Two Amnesties: Former Political Prisoners and Exiles in the Roman Revolution of 1848 Leopold G. Glueckert Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Glueckert, Leopold G., "Between Two Amnesties: Former Political Prisoners and Exiles in the Roman Revolution of 1848" (1989). Dissertations. 2639. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/2639 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1989 Leopold G. Glueckert BETWEEN TWO AMNESTIES: FORMER POLITICAL PRISONERS AND EXILES IN THE ROMAN REVOLUTION OF 1848 by Leopold G. Glueckert, O.Carm. A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Loyola University of Chicago in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 1989 Leopold G. Glueckert 1989 © All Rights Reserved ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS As with any paper which has been under way for so long, many people have shared in this work and deserve thanks. Above all, I would like to thank my director, Dr. Anthony Cardoza, and the members of my committee, Dr. Walter Gray and Fr. Richard Costigan. Their patience and encourage­ ment have been every bit as important to me as their good advice and professionalism.
  • Ancient Rome

    Ancient Rome

    Ancient Rome Beginnings Founding • The Latins, an Indo-European-speaking Italic people from central Europe, crossed the Alps about 1500 B.C. and invaded Italy. • Attracted by the warm climate and fertile land, the Latins conquered the native peoples and settled in central Italy. • On the seven hills overlooking the Tiber River, they founded the city of Rome. • (According to Roman legend, the city was founded in 753 B.C. by two descendants of the gods – the twin brothers Romulus and Remus) Life Among the Early Latins The early Latins, a simple, hardy people, • worked chiefly at farming and cattle-raising; • maintained close family ties, with the father exercising absolute authority; • worshipped tribal gods (Jupiter, the chief god; Mars, god of war; Neptune, god of the sea; and Venus, goddess of love), and • defended Rome against frequent attacks Etruscan Territory • Etruscan architecture was created between about 700 BC and 200 BC, when the expanding civilization of ancient Rome finally absorbed Etruscan civilization. The Etruscans were considerable builders in stone, wood and other materials of temples, houses, tombs and city walls, as well as bridges and roads. The only structures remaining in quantity in anything like their original condition are tombs and walls, but through archaeology and other sources we have a good deal of information on what once existed. Etruscan Architecture Etruscan Funeral Urns From Etruscan Rule to Independence Rome was captured about 750 B.C. by its northern neighbors, the Etruscans. From these more advanced people, the Latins, or Romans, learned to • construct buildings, roads and city walls, • make metal weapons, and • Apply new military tactics; The Romans in 500 B.C.
  • Unification of Italy 1792 to 1925 French Revolutionary Wars to Mussolini

    Unification of Italy 1792 to 1925 French Revolutionary Wars to Mussolini

    UNIFICATION OF ITALY 1792 TO 1925 FRENCH REVOLUTIONARY WARS TO MUSSOLINI ERA SUMMARY – UNIFICATION OF ITALY Divided Italy—From the Age of Charlemagne to the 19th century, Italy was divided into northern, central and, southern kingdoms. Northern Italy was composed of independent duchies and city-states that were part of the Holy Roman Empire; the Papal States of central Italy were ruled by the Pope; and southern Italy had been ruled as an independent Kingdom since the Norman conquest of 1059. The language, culture, and government of each region developed independently so the idea of a united Italy did not gain popularity until the 19th century, after the Napoleonic Wars wreaked havoc on the traditional order. Italian Unification, also known as "Risorgimento", refers to the period between 1848 and 1870 during which all the kingdoms on the Italian Peninsula were united under a single ruler. The most well-known character associated with the unification of Italy is Garibaldi, an Italian hero who fought dozens of battles for Italy and overthrew the kingdom of Sicily with a small band of patriots, but this romantic story obscures a much more complicated history. The real masterminds of Italian unity were not revolutionaries, but a group of ministers from the kingdom of Sardinia who managed to bring about an Italian political union governed by ITALY BEFORE UNIFICATION, 1792 B.C. themselves. Military expeditions played an important role in the creation of a United Italy, but so did secret societies, bribery, back-room agreements, foreign alliances, and financial opportunism. Italy and the French Revolution—The real story of the Unification of Italy began with the French conquest of Italy during the French Revolutionary Wars.
  • Roman History, I: the Republic

    Roman History, I: the Republic

    Walter Scheidel Office hours: Tue 1.30-2 & Thu 1.30-3 Office: 20-22L Office phone: (650) 723-0478 Mailbox: Classics Department e-mail: [email protected] (Main Quad, Building 20) www.stanford.edu/~scheidel Christelle Fischer ([email protected]) James Greenberg ([email protected]) CLASS HIS 102 = HISTORY 102X ROMAN HISTORY, I: THE REPUBLIC Winter Quarter 2004 TueThu 11-12.15 60-61G Required texts (available at the Stanford Bookstore) • M. Crawford, The Roman Republic (2nd ed., Harvard University Press, 1993) • A. Lintott, The Roman Republic (Sutton, 2000) • R. Mellor, The Historians of Ancient Rome: An Anthology of the Major Writings (Routledge, 1998) • Cicero, Selected Political Speeches (rev. ed. Penguin, 1989) • Plutarch, Fall of the Roman Republic (rev ed., Penguin, 1972) • K. Hopkins, Conquerors and Slaves: Sociological Studies in Roman History, 1 (Cambridge 1978), chapters 1-2 (out of print; available as a course package) Schedule and readings Tue, Jan 6 Introduction: Why Rome matters Thu, Jan 8 What can we know about early Rome? – Bottom-up perspectives Crawford ch. 2; Lintott 1-21 Tue, Jan 13 What are we told about early Rome? – The Fabrication of Historical Tradition Mellor 1-5, 147-210; Crawford ch. 1 Thu, Jan 15 Synopsis, c.400-133 BCE: How to build an empire Mellor 233-246; Crawford ch. 4-6; Lintott 12-66 Tue, Jan 20 The constitutional framework: institutions and process Crawford ch. 3, 7, app. 1 Thu, Jan 22 Governing Rome: oligarchy in action Mellor 211-233, then 47-59; handouts Tue, Jan 27 Roman militarism: continuous ‘just war’ Mellor 17-27, 32-47; Crawford app.
  • The Ancient People of Italy Before the Rise of Rome, Italy Was a Patchwork

    The Ancient People of Italy Before the Rise of Rome, Italy Was a Patchwork

    The Ancient People of Italy Before the rise of Rome, Italy was a patchwork of different cultures. Eventually they were all subsumed into Roman culture, but the cultural uniformity of Roman Italy erased what had once been a vast array of different peoples, cultures, languages, and civilizations. All these cultures existed before the Roman conquest of the Italian Peninsula, and unfortunately we know little about any of them before they caught the attention of Greek and Roman historians. Aside from a few inscriptions, most of what we know about the native people of Italy comes from Greek and Roman sources. Still, this information, combined with archaeological and linguistic information, gives us some idea about the peoples that once populated the Italian Peninsula. Italy was not isolated from the outside world, and neighboring people had much impact on its population. There were several foreign invasions of Italy during the period leading up to the Roman conquest that had important effects on the people of Italy. First there was the invasion of Alexander I of Epirus in 334 BC, which was followed by that of Pyrrhus of Epirus in 280 BC. Hannibal of Carthage invaded Italy during the Second Punic War (218–203 BC) with the express purpose of convincing Rome’s allies to abandon her. After the war, Rome rearranged its relations with many of the native people of Italy, much influenced by which peoples had remained loyal and which had supported their Carthaginian enemies. The sides different peoples took in these wars had major impacts on their destinies. In 91 BC, many of the peoples of Italy rebelled against Rome in the Social War.
  • The Roman Theocracy and the Republic, 1846-1849

    The Roman Theocracy and the Republic, 1846-1849

    ^ney //n-ivm'iU^ ,-^ ^ c/6..y/io>^^ ^y^' wen^ 7/fm rr.jt/i/ </ l(f////</•/mi THE ROMAN THEOCRACY AND THE REPUBLIC .S«a_ The Roman Theocracy and The Republic 1846-1849 BY R. M. JOHNSTON Hontion MACMILLAN AND CO., Limited NEW YORK : THE MACMILLAN COMPANY I9CI jill rights reserved j1(?7^^ HE:NRY morse STePHCNS- — —— CONTENTS CHAPTER I Some Antecedents of the Roman Theocracy PAGE The Papacy and the Roman Empire— Continuity of traditions—Struggle be- tween North and South—Rise of Italian nationalism—Strength and weakness of the Popes—Character of the Italians — Conditions in the States of the Church—Secret Societies—The Memorandum of 183 1 Papal justice—Finance—Administration—The rule of the Theocracy Death of Gregory XVI I CHAPTER n The Election of Pius IX The Amnesty The Conclave summoned—Nationalist influences —The Primato and Ultimi Cast—The Bishop of Imola—His personality and opinions—The Papal election—Lambruschini and Micara—Proclamation of Pius IX—His first acts —The Amnesty—Popular enthusiasm— Metternich's foreboding . 29 CHAPTER HI Italian Sentiment and Parties Unrest of the Peninsula—Kingdom of Sardinia—The Austrian provinces and regime—The writers — Double current of nationalist sentiment— Mazzini and the Gio-vane Italia—Rise and fall of his popularity— Gioberti— His correspondence with Mazzini—The Primato—A remarkable prophecy Balbo—D' Azeglio—His interview with Charles Albert —Antagonism of democrats and Albertists . -41 511196 — ri THE ROMAN THEOCRACY CHAPTER IV Early Months of the Pontificate—The Congress of Genoa PAGE Popularity of Pius —Difficulty of his position—The Gregorian party opposes him— Gizzi State Secretary—First attempts at reform—Sanfedist agitation — Failure of crops Scientific Congresses Nationalist — — enthusiasm .
  • The Roaming Roman All the News Romans Need to Know 182AD Rome

    The Roaming Roman All the News Romans Need to Know 182AD Rome

    The Roaming Roman All the News Romans Need to Know 182AD Rome Letter to the Editor Connelius Reillium Dear Roaming Roman, I am writing this letter because I want you to know I am sorry, but only that I failed to kill Commodus. If I had succeeded, Lucilla and her husband would have brought the Roman Empire back to the glory we saw when her father Marcus Aurelius ruled. The two years since he died have been terrible for the Roman Empire. In his 58 years of life, the only thing he did that was bad for the Romans was to let Commodus into power. Marcus Aurelius was a great man. Plato himself would have said he was the Philosopher King he hoped would rule an empire. I read his Meditations regularly and find his Stoicism so different from the terrible policies of Commodus. Commodus does not seem to care about us Romans. Commodus had everything handed to him, but your father was different. His father died when he was two, but that did not stop Marcus Aurelius. He became a consul at 18 and a tribune at 25. He even died fighting the German tribes. Romans need a leader like your father. Commodus needs to be killed, but he will certainly sentence me to death for trying to kill him outside the theater today. I only hope someone finds my dagger and finishes the job. Sincerely, Appius Claudius Quintianus, 182AD Bust of Emperor Marcus Aurelius 160-170 Source: British Museum Sources: Aurelius, Marcus, The Emperor’s Handbook Boak, Arthur, A History of Rome to A.D.565 Birley, Anthony, Marcus Aurelius Knight, Judson, Ancient Civilizations: Biographies .
  • Hifcv 2019 AUGUST

    Hifcv 2019 AUGUST

    HARRIET ISABEL FLOWER Address Department of Classics, Princeton University, 159 East Pyne, Princeton, NJ 08544 [email protected] / 609-258-5572 Special Interests Roman History and Historiography, Epigraphy, Latin Literature Education Ph.D. May 1993, in Ancient History, University of Pennsylvania. Dissertation: Imagines Maiorum: Ancestral Masks as Symbols of Ideology and Power. B.A., M.A., 1983, in Classics, University College, Oxford University. (ancient history and literature). Teaching Experience From 2017 Andrew Fleming West Professor of Classics, Princeton University 2007 - present: Professor of Classics, Princeton University. 2003 - 2007: Associate Professor of Classics, Princeton University. 2000 - 2003: Associate Professor of Classics, Franklin and Marshall College, Lancaster, PA. 1994 - 2000: Assistant Professor of Classics, Franklin and Marshall College, Lancaster, PA. 1984 - 1986: Latin teacher and Head of Department, Lincoln School, Providence RI. Spring 1984: Instructor, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI. Administrative Experience 2019 -- Clerk of the Faculty, Princeton University 2010 – 2018: Head of Mathey College, Princeton University 2018 - Member, advisory board of Klio, Beiträge zur Alten Geschichte January 2015: organizer of Lived Ancient Religion: a symposium in collaboration with the Max- Weber-Kolleg für kultur- und sozialwissenschaftliche Studien, Erfurt University (Germany) at Princeton 2013 – 2015: Member, University Student Life Committee, Princeton University 2012 – 2017: Member, Advisory board, ERC
  • Ross Burns Justinian's Fortifications East of Antioch

    Ross Burns Justinian's Fortifications East of Antioch

    Ross Burns Justinian’s Fortifications East of Antioch Almost fifty years ago, Dillemann put the issues starkly – fortifications were a useless distraction: The Notitia Dignatatum, at the beginning of the 5th Century, only speaks of units, generally cavalry, with their bases. In [Procopius’] Buildings, the only issues are fortified positions with no mention of units. Defence policy has reached sclerosis. Previously, positions were surrounded by walls of light construction, like enclosures, which attracted Procopius’ disapproval. For good reasons Justinian’s predecessors judged it useless to raise solid ramparts; it was a nonsense to condemn cavalry to defend them. The latter only had to be given shelter from the blows of marauders and pillagers; they did not imagine they had to withstand a siege.1 Is it true, as Dillemann has argued, that Justinian put too much faith in fortresses and not enough in manpower and élan? As a corrective, we have Liebeschuetz’s observation that while fortresses did not in themselves amount to an impermeable physical barrier, they prevented permanent occupation of territory by an enemy. In the sixth century there was no way in which the Persians could be prevented from penetrating into the Empire. The only way to check an invasion was by means of a field army strong enough to defeat or at least to threaten the invading force. Fortified cities provided no kind of barrier and most of them could be captured easily. Nevertheless, they too had an important function. They provided shelter for the inhabitants, their corn and their animals. They also provided bases for Roman armies operating in the neighbourhood…[The Persians] could not remain in permanent occupation while the cities were not in their hands.2 It is well recognised that no line of fortresses can operate as an effective line of defence in its own right.3 Nevertheless, the distribution of forts could mark out the extent of territory a state sought to control for most purposes.