Partnering Pays Off for M1 Barrier Work

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Partnering Pays Off for M1 Barrier Work Newsletter Early Summer 2004 9 Tenth Anniversary for Highways Agency Partnering pays off This year the Highways Agency celebrates its 10th anniversary as for M1 barrier work provider of the major roads network. This consists of 5,130 miles of Refurbishment works to the M1 motorway motorways and trunk roads. The between junctions 1 and 2 included the Agency has an annual programme installation of around 2,100 m of in-situ budget of £1.6bn, of which some £500 concrete barrier, the majority of which was million is spent on major improvements high containment (H4a), located in the verge. to the network. The project, undertaken on behalf of The English strategic road network is the Highways Agency and managed by Mouchel, largest single Government asset, valued was awarded to Tarmac National Contracting at £65bn. It carries one third of all road just before Christmas, with a start on site traffic in England and two thirds of all around the middle of February, and all work heavy freight traffic, with more than to be completed by end of March. The 170 billion vehicle kilometre journeys quantity and duration of the concrete barrier undertaken every year. work meant that its construction was on the critical path of the entire project The current programme contains more programme. than 70 major schemes, each over £5 million. The specialist slipform paving subcontract works were awarded to Extrudakerb and Schemes due to start in 2004 – 05 detailed planning and preparation work was A63 Melton Junction, East Yorkshire undertaken between subcontractor, main A5 Weeford Fazeley Improvement, Staffordshire contractor and project manager to explore A421 Great Barford Bypass, Bedfordshire new avenues in an effort to provide rates of A14 Rookery Crossroad, Suffolk production never previously achieved. Slipforming vertical concrete safety barrier on the M1 refurbishment work. A47 Thorney Bypass, Peterborough Extrudakerb realised that the appointment M4 Junction 18 Eastbound Diverge, Bristol/South of a concrete supplier who understood the were consistently achieved, peaking at Gloucestershire demands of the slipform process, and 134 m3 within an eight hour paving shift. M5 Junction 17 – 18 Northbound Climbing Lane specifically those associated with high barrier All barrier was constructed within tolerance A249 Iwade-Queenborough Improvement (DBFO), paving, was critical to the success of the and no remedial works were required, a Kent project. RMC Readymix was awarded the testimony to the success of the partnering contract to supply the 3,500 m3 of C28/35 Schemes due to finish 2004 – 05 achieved between subcontractor and air-entrained concrete required from their A10 Wadesmill Colliers End Bypass, Hertfordshire concrete supplier. Wembley plant. A120 Stansted-Braintree, Essex A21 Lamberhurst Bypass, Kent For the first time the concrete base and In light of the projected increase in A34 Chievely/M4 Junction 13 Improvement, haunch, below and at the back of the barrier, demand for concrete barrier across the road Berkshire was slipformed, enabling high production network, Highways Agency should take A63 Selby Bypass, North Yorkshire rates to be achieved at high tolerance and comfort from the fact that industry is clearly demonstrating both a desire and an ability A2 Bean Cobham Phase 1, Kent avoiding the time consuming and costly follow-on works of hand laying the verge to meet demand and deliver a quality A1 Stannington Junction, Northumberland side haunch after barrier construction. product at high rates of production. Schemes completed 2003 – 04 However restricted working space dictated For more information contact that some lengths had to be hand laid. A500 Basford, Hough, Shavington Bypass, [email protected] Staffordshire Extrudakerb provided two four-track A46 Newark-Lincoln Improvement, Lincolnshire Gomaco Commander III slipform pavers to A6 Rothwell-Desborough Bypass, which paving moulds can be mounted to the Northamptonshire Diary Dates left or right side, allowing both verge and A6 Rushden and Higham Ferrers Bypass, central reservation works to progress in the Annual General Meeting Northamptonshire same direction as adjacent traffic flow, 11.30 am, 10 June A41 Aston Clinton Bypass, Buckinghamshire avoiding the need to turn around concrete Novotel, Euston, London A1033Hedon Road Improvement, Kingston Upon Hull delivery wagons. Britpave Conference 2004 A6 Alvaston Bypass, Derbyshire 27 & 28 September A650 Bingley Relief Road, West Yorkshire The careful planning and pre-start meetings paid off; record rates of production Belton Woods Hotel, Grantham www.britpave.org.uk 1 Local aggregates Preparing for increase sustainability the big bird for Jersey Airport By the time the first A380 lands at Heathrow in spring 2006, many of its taxiways will have been widened and repositioned, both of its two runways lengthened, and entire pier redeveloped and aircraft stands modified to accommodate the larger aircraft. The £430 million project, which will last three years, got underway with the redevelopment of two taxiways adjacent to the southern runway, when AMEC began widening and repositioning them to accommodate the new aircraft’s 80 m Jersey Airport, before and after completion of the new taxiway wingspan. Working in small sections to keep Taxiway Alpha at Jersey Airport was of • Pavement quality concrete (PQC) of diversions to a minimum, AMEC is replacing inadequate strength and had became higher strength than previously used 150,000 m2 of concrete pavement with new uneconomic to maintain. Additionally, it pavement quality concrete. As the airport is • High modulus bituminous material. was not far enough from the runway to built mainly on gravel, cement stabilisation comply with current safety standards. To The life cycle cost analysis showed that the is also being used. The old concrete is being cope with future air traffic and the safety rigid pavement option was preferable. recycled for use in the construction work aspects, the decision was taken to realign for Terminal 5. and strengthen this taxiway. Since the pavement design was based on an analytical approach the materials were Following this is the redevelopment of As an island, Jersey has limited aggregate specified in terms of performance rather Pier 6 of Terminal 3, which is being resources, and high harbour dues make the than taking a prescribed approach demolished and realigned to suit the A380 importation of materials and specialised taxiway. There will also be four stands plant expensive. Therefore optimising the End product performance related testing capable of accommodating the new plane. pavement design and maximising the was adopted to monitor and approve the A particular challenge is managing the performance of locally available materials pavement materials during construction. interface between several projects were key to achieving best value for the This included dynamic plate bearing tests underway at the same time, including the project. for the subgrade and capping stiffnesses, and compressive strength for the PQC and construction of a new tunnel between the The client, Jersey Airport, had experience CBM. central terminal area and the new Terminal 5. of concrete taxiways utilising local This will allow the delivery of three remote aggregates and found that they provided The development work achieved T5 stands before the opening of the new low maintenance and long term durability, considerable improvements in the terminal building. but they also had to consider the pavement’s value for money and allowed BAA’s Managing Director, Mike Clasper, alternative of flexible pavements, taking the utilisation of more sustainable predicts moderate growth in air traffic of into account whole life cost where pavement materials with associated 3 – 5% per annum over the next 10 years, resurfacing would be required within the environmental benefits. The following cost with recent traffic affected by the SARS pavement design life. savings were achieved: outbreak. Despite the slowdown, he says The contractor, Britpave members, Scott • 10% reduction in PQC thickness due to that runway capacity in the south east has Wilson Pavement Engineering, carried out higher flexural strength already reached capacity during the peak material studies to ascertain the way • 30% cost saving in CBM by using hours, and calls for the Government’s forward, making best use of local secondary aggregates consultation on future runways to help materials. These were carried out in the meet long term objectives. laboratory followed by field trials: They • 90% reduction in capping cost by BAA is already committed to investment investigated: utilising site excavated Mudstone in lieu of granular materials. of over £8bn over the next 10 years. • Capping/subgrade improvement from Projects include the £3.9m on Terminal 5, Mudstone (in nearby borrow pits) For further details contact: Dr Bachar £1bn at Gatwick to raise capacity to Hakim of Scott Wilson Pavement 40 million passengers, £800m at Stansted, • Cement bound material (CBM) using Engineering at [email protected] £3.4bn at Heathrow and £500m at Scottish quarry screenings airports. 2 www.britpave.org.uk London City Airport extension finishes four months early London City Airport now has the benefit of increased capacity following the completion in September 2003 of the Runway 28 Hold project that provided valuable holding space for aircraft at the eastern end of the runway. The unique surroundings of this innovative airport provided challenges
Recommended publications
  • Call for Sites 2021 Justification Statement V3
    Planning Justification Statement Representation to Hertsmere Local Plan Process Commercial Redevelopment Land and Buildings at the Mercure Hotel Watford, A41 Bypass WD25 8JH March 2021 Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. The Site 4 3. The Proposal 7 4. Exceptional Circumstances 12 5. Economic Need 16 6. Green Belt and Landscape 25 7. Transport and Accessibility 31 8. Flood Risk 34 9. Ecology and Trees 37 10. Heritage 40 11. Other Technical Matters 41 12. Case of Exceptional Circumstances 43 13. Conclusion 51 Appendix A: Site Planning History 1 1. Introduction This Planning Justification Statement is submitted by Warner Planning on behalf of Regen Properties LLP. This submission is made to the Hertsmere Borough Council 'Employment Land Call for Sites' 2021. We promote land and buildings at the Mercure Hotel Watford, A41 Bypass WD25 8JH for allocation for B8 with ancillary B1 commercial development. The hotel has been struggling for several years, which has been further compounded by the Covid-19 Pandemic, and the hotel is due to close in late 2021/early 2022. This statement, therefore, provides representations in respect of the whole site, including the hotel buildings and the land to the south-east of the building, which is part of the same plot. Through this statement, we will demonstrate that this is a credible and deliverable opportunity with no technical issues. This submission is supported by a wealth of technical reports, including: • Masterplans – UMC • Economic Benefits Assessment - Lichfields • Landscape Visual Overview – CSA Environmental • Ecology Overview- CSA Environmental • Aboricultural Assessment – DCCLA • Flood Risk and Drainage Apprisal – EAS • Transport Review – EAS • Desk Based Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment – TRC • This Statement – Warner Planning • Market Report – Knight Frank • Employment Call for Sites Submission Form There are limited alternatives to this proposal.
    [Show full text]
  • 160 Great Britain for Updates, Visit Wigan 27 28
    160 Great Britain For Updates, visit www.routex.com Wigan 27 28 Birkenhead Liverpool M62 36 Manchester Stockport M56 Mold Chester 35 Congleton Wrexham 59 M6 Shrewsbury 64 65 07 Wolverhampton Walsall West Bromwich Llandrindod Birmingham Wells Solihull M6 03 Coventry Warwick02 Carmarthen Hereford 01 51 60 Neath M5 Swansea 06 Pontypridd Bridgend Caerphilly Newport Cardiff M4 13 Barry Swindon M5 Bristol 61 14 Weston-super-Mare Kingswood 31 Bath 32 M4 05 Trowbridge 62 Newbury Taunton M5 20 Yeovil Winchester Exeter Southampton 55 Exmouth M27 Poole Lymington Bournemouth Plymouth Torbay Newport GB_Landkarte.indd 160 05.11.12 12:44 Great Britain 161 Wakefield 16 Huddersfield Hull Barnsley Doncaster Scunthorpe Grimsby Rotherham Sheffield M1 Louth 47M1 Heanor Derby Nottingham 48 24 Grantham 15 Loughborough 42 King's Leicester Lynn 39 40 Aylsham Peterborough Coventry Norwich GB 46 01 Warwick Huntingdon Thetford Lowestoft 45 M1 Northampton 02 43 44 Cambridge Milton Bedford Keynes Biggleswade Sawston 18 M40 19 Ipswich Luton Aylesbury Oxford Felixstowe Hertford 21 50 M25 M11 Chelmsford 61 30 53 52 Slough London Bracknell Southend-on-Sea Newbury Grays 54 Wokingham 29 Rochester Basingstoke 22 M3 Guildford M2 M25 Maidstone Winchester 23 M20 17 M27 Portsmouth Chichester Brighton La Manche Calais Newport A16 A26 Boulogne-sur-Mer GB_Landkarte.indd 161 05.11.12 12:44 162 Great Britain Forfar Perth Dundee 58 Stirling Alloa 34 Greenock M90 Dumbarton Kirkintilloch Dunfermline 57 Falkirk Glasgow Paisley Livingston Edinburgh Newton M8 Haddington Mearns 04 56 Dalkeith 26 Irvine Kilmarnock Ayr Hawick A74(M) 41 Dumfries 25 Morpeth Newcastle Carlisle Upon Whitley Bay 12Tyne 08 South Shields Gateshead 09 11 Durham 49 Redcar 33 Stockton-on-Tees M6 Middlesbrough 10 38 M6 A1(M) 37 Harrogate York 63 M65 Bradford Leeds Beverley M6 28 M62 Wakefield Wigan 16 27 Huddersfield Birkenhead Liverpool Manchester Barnsley M62 Scunthorpe 35 36Stockport Doncaster Rotherham Sheffield GB_Landkarte.indd 162 05.11.12 12:44 Great Britain 163 GPS Nr.
    [Show full text]
  • The M1 Motorway (Junctions 5 – 6A
    THE M1 MOTORWAY(JUNCTIONS 5–6A) TEMPORARYOVERNIGHT CLOSURES Notice is hereby given that Highways England Company Limited(a) intends to make an Order on the M1 Motorway,inthe County of Hertfordshire, under Section 14(1)(a) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 because works areproposed to be executed on the road. The effect of the Order would be to authorise the overnight closureofthe following – (a) the slip roads leading to and from both carriageways of the M1 at Junction 5(A41, A4008); (b) the slip roads leading to and from both carriageways of the M1 at Junction 6(A405); and (c) the link road leading from the southbound carriageway of the M1 at Junction 6A to both carriageways of the M25 at Junction 21. These measures would be in the interest of road safety to enable contractors to undertake cyclical maintenance work. It is expected that the work would take place for approximately 1-2nights for each closureat(a) –(c) above every two months at the following times: Monday-Thursday nights 22:00 –05:30 Friday nights 23:00 –06:00 Saturday nights 22:00 –06:00 Sunday nights 22:30 –05:30 The Order would come into force on 1August2017 and have amaximum duration of twelve months. During the closures outlined above, traffic affected would be diverted using other junctions of the M1, the A41, the A405 and the A410. The slip road closures, link road closureand diversion routes would be clearly indicated by traffic signs throughout the works periods. MTaylor, an official of Highways England Company Limited Ref: HA/M1/35/3/1894 (a)Registered in England and Wales under company no.
    [Show full text]
  • M1 Motorway (Junctions 1-3), M25
    M1 MOTORWAY(JUNCTIONS 1-3), M25 MOTORWAYJUNCTION 23, AND A1 TRUNK ROAD TEMPORARYTRAFFIC RESTRICTIONS Notice is hereby given that Highways England Company Limited intends to make an Order on the M25 Motorway in the County of Hertfordshire and the London Boroughs of Barnet and Hendon, under Section 14(1)(a) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 because works are proposed to be executed on the road. The effect of the Order would be to authorise the overnight closure, in phases, of:- a) the entirecirculatory carriageway of the roundabout at M25 Junction 23 (A1(M)/A1); b) the roads leading to and from both carriageways of the M25 at Junction 23 (A1(M) Junction 1/A1); c) the roads leading to and from both carriageways of the A1(M)/A1 at Junction 23 (A1(M) Junction 1/A1); d) the southbound carriageway of the A1 between Bignell’sCorner (M25 Junction 23) and Borehamwood Interchange (A5135); e) the road leading from the southbound carriageway of the A1 at Borehamwood Interchange (A5135); f) the northbound carriageway of the M1 between Junction 1(A406) and the tip of the nosing of the entry slip road at Junction 3 (London Gateway Services); g) the road leading to the northbound carriageway of the M1 at Junction 1(A406); h) the road connecting to the M1 northbound entry slip road from the eastbound road connecting the EdgwareRoad roundabout to Staples Corner roundabout at Junction 1 (A406); i) theroads connecting to and from both carriageways of the M1 at Junction 2(A1); and j) all of the roads leading to and from both carriageways of the M1 at London Gateway Services.
    [Show full text]
  • The A1(M) Motorway (Junction 42 to Junction 43 and Junction 44) and the A64 Trunk Road (Temporary Prohibition of Traffic) Order 2011
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2011 No. 89 ROAD TRAFFIC The A1(M) Motorway (Junction 42 to Junction 43 and Junction 44) and the A64 Trunk Road (Temporary Prohibition of Traffic) Order 2011 Made - - - - 11 January 2011 Coming into force - - 16 January 2011 WHEREAS, the Secretary of State for Transport, being the traffic authority for the A1(M) Motorway, the A64 Trunk Road and connecting roads, in the Districts of Leeds and Selby in the Counties of West Yorkshire and North Yorkshire, is satisfied that traffic on that motorway and some of those connecting roads should be prohibited because survey, investigation and general maintenance works are proposed to be executed thereon: NOW, THEREFORE, the Secretary of State, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 14(1)(a) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984(a), makes the following Order: - 1. This Order may be cited as the A1(M) Motorway (Junction 42 to Junction 43 and Junction 44) and the A64 Trunk Road (Temporary Prohibition of Traffic) Order 2011 and shall come into force on 16 January 2011. 2. In this Order; – “the A1(M)” means the A1(M) Motorway; “the M1” means the M1 Motorway at Junction 48 (Hook Moor); “the A64” means the A64 Trunk Road “the northbound carriageway” means the A1(M) northbound carriageway from the nose of the northbound exit slip road at Junction 42 (Selby Fork) to its junction with the M1 northbound carriageway at Hook Moor (the A1(M) Junction 43), a distance of 4800 metres; “the southbound carriageway” means the A1(M) southbound carriageway from its junction with the M1
    [Show full text]
  • Prominent Car Dealership Premises
    TO LET. Unit 24, Whitby Avenue, Park Royal, London NW10 7SF. Warehouse / Industrial Unit –4,826 sq f t (448.4 sq m) including Covered Loading. Property Features. • To be fully refurbished • Fitted first floor offices • End of terrace unit • 5.63m clear height • Trade counter potential • Covered loading • Undercroft for flexible future fit out • 5 car parking spaces Location. Terms. EPC. Located within the heart of Park Royal, on the Whitby Unit 24 is available by way of a new full repairing and D:87 Avenue Industrial Estate, Whitby Avenue. Accessed insuring lease at a annual rent of £87,000 per annum from Abbey Road, within the established and sought exclusive. after Park Royal industrial area. Legal Costs. The property is conveniently located for quick and easy Business Rates. Each party to bear their own legal costs. access to the North Circular Road (A406), providing access to the M1 motorway and Western Avenue (A40) The property has a rateable value of £40,250 and is eastbound providing access to Central London and described as “warehouse & premises”. All interested VAT. westbound for the A40 / M40, M25 and M4 motorways. parties should make enquires at Brent Local Authority. Ref: 55480024000001. Rent is subject to VAT. Park Royal station (Piccadilly line), Hanger lane (Central line) and Stonebridge Park (Bakerloo line) are all within walking distance. Description. An end of terrace unit comprising 5.63m clear height rising to 7.5 at the apex, warehouse lighting, undercroft for low height storage, trade counter or welfare accommodation and fully fitted first floor offices. Goods access is via a covered loading area and single level loading door measuring 4.82m wide by 5.0 high.
    [Show full text]
  • M4 Smart Motorway Faqs
    Transport for NSW M4 Smart Motorway FAQs Here are some of our top questions about the M4 Smart Motorway project. Which motorway is the M4? The M4 Motorway is a 35km long motorway that opened in Sydney in the 1960’s. It stretches from Concord in the inner west to Lapstone in the Blue Mountains. The M4 Motorway connects to the M5 WestConnex at Haberfeld and also intersects the Westlink M7 at Eastern Creek. What is the M4 Smart The M4 Motorway will become frst smart motorway in Motorway Project? NSW with new road structures and technology being installed from Parramatta to Penrith. What is a Smart Motorway? A Smart Motorway, also known as a Managed Motorway in Victoria, use real-time information, communication and trafc control systems in and alongside the road to improve trafc fow. Variable road signs and messages communicate to drivers how to best travel along the motorway for a safer, more consistent journey with less congestion. roads-maritime.transport.nsw.gov.au Page 1 of 3 M4 Smart Motorway FAQs Where else is this technology Smart motorway technologies are being used on Melbourne’s being used in Australia? M1 motorway and introduced in southern Queensland on several roads including the Ipswich Motorway. Some individual elements of the technology are already in place on Sydney roads including the M1, M2, M5 and M7 Motorways. Has this system delivered Yes, studies have reported a signifcant reduction in improvements in other motorway incidents and improved trafc fow. On locations? Melbourne’s M1 Motorway reports have shown: • Travel times have been reduced by up to 42 percent • Crash rates have decreased by 30 percent • Vehicle emissions have been reduced by 11 percent How does the Smart There are a number of diferent parts that work together to Motorway work? ensure trafc fow and safety along the motorway.
    [Show full text]
  • Post Opening Project Evaluation M1 J10-13 HSR & Junctions
    Post Opening Project Evaluation M1 J10-13 HSR & Junctions One Year After Study October 2016 Notice Although this report was commissioned by Highways England, the findings and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Highways England. While Highways England has made every effort to ensure the information in this document is accurate, Highways England does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of that information; and it cannot accept liability for any loss or damages of any kind resulting from reliance on the information or guidance this document contains. Post Opening Project Evaluation M1 J10-13 HSR and Junctions: One Year After Study Foreword Highways England’s motorways are some of the safest in the world. Our road network carries a third of road traffic and we have seen demand grow by a quarter since 2000 with continued growth forecast. One reason for the introduction is smart motorways is because there are more vehicles on the road. By making use of the full width of the road, smart motorways add that extra capacity to carry more vehicles and ease congestion. They have evolved from Controlled Motorways (with variable speed limits) to Dynamic Hard Shoulder Running (opening the hard shoulder as a running lane to traffic at busy periods) to All Lane Running (permanently removing the hard shoulder and converting it into a running lane). Compared to a traditional motorway widening they deliver: • Increased capacity at significantly less cost than traditional motorway widening. • New technology and variable speed limits to improve traffic flow.
    [Show full text]
  • Litter Strategy Our Approach
    Litter Strategy Our approach Introduction If people didn’t drop litter, it wouldn’t have to The Department for Environment, Food and Rural be picked up. Litter on our network is not only Affairs (Defra) Code of Practice 2006 on litter and unsightly, it’s hazardous too. It can obstruct refuse (available at www.defra.gov.uk) defines litter: drivers and is a public health concern for our road workers during the clearing process, and that ‘to include materials often associated with time and money could be better spent on other smoking, eating and drinking, that are priorities. As well as economic impacts it also improperly discarded and left by members of has wider, adverse environmental concerns. the public; or spilt during business operations as well as waste management operations.’ We remain committed to delivering a high level of service for customers and communities We developed this strategy in consultation educating and informing those who drop litter with external partners such as government on our network of the consequences as we play departments, local authorities, suppliers and our part in reducing this cost to the public. other related associations to present a focused, holistic, approach to managing litter on the Our aspiration is that this strategy will help network. The strategy presents our vision, and it change the behaviours of those who drop is an approach we share openly and publicly. litter and we will continue to work with our stakeholders, suppliers and staff to achieve this. Purpose The purpose of this litter strategy is to outline how Background we can better manage litter on the network.
    [Show full text]
  • M1 Motorway (Junctions 1-4) Temporary
    M1 MOTORWAY(JUNCTIONS 1-4) TEMPORARYTRAFFIC RESTRICTIONS Notice is hereby given that Highways England Company Limited intends to make an Order on the M1 Motorway in the London Boroughs of Barnet and Harrow,under Section14(1)(a) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 because works areproposed to be executed on the road. The effect of the Order would be to authorise the phased overnight closureof:- 1) the northbound carriageway of the M1 between the commencement of the elevated section at Staples Corner circulatory (M1 Junction 1/A406) and Junction 4(A41); 2) the road leading to the northbound carriageway of the M1 at Junction 1(A406); 3) the road connecting to the M1 northbound entry slip road from the eastbound road connecting the EdgwareRoad roundabout to Staples Corner roundabout at Junction 1 (A406); 4) the fast link connecting from the southbound carriageway of the M1 to the clockwise carriageway of the A406 at Junction 1(A406); 5) the roads leading to the northbound carriageway,and from the southbound carriageway,ofthe M1 at Junction 2(A1); 6) theroads leading to and from both carriageways of the M1 at London Gateway Services, and 7) the road connecting from the southbound carriageway of the M1 to the southbound carriageway of the A41 at Junction 4(A41). These measures would be in the interests of road safety while contractors undertake bridge joint repair and all associated works. It is expected that the work would occur in several intermittent phases and last in total for approximately 8months being part of a package of works also including the M25 Junctions 26 -27 and the M11, starting on or after Monday 15th June 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Doncaster Infrastructure Strategy Annex
    SDEB28.2 DONCASTER INFRASTRUCTURE STRATEGY MEETING OUR LONG TERM INVESTMENT NEEDS ANNEX 2020 UPDATE www.doncaster.gov.uk 1 INTRODUCTION This report is the annex to the Doncaster Infrastructure Strategy main report. It amends the 2015 report with updated baseline data and scheme information. All data is a correct as at spring 2019. The Doncaster Infrastructure Strategy consists of the following sections. A main report setting out the key infrastructure needs facing the borough and how they will be addressed. An annex containing a more detailed description of the key infrastructure proposals and projects. A short summary of main findings and recommendations of the report. The main report includes a schedule of the key infrastructure projects that are required or are desirable to support Doncaster’s growth. This annex covers the following themes. 1. Transportation (strategic highways, rail transport, cycling and bus transport). 2. Education and learning (primary, secondary and further education). 3. Green infrastructure (greenspaces, green routes and biodiversity). 4. Health and social care. 5. Flooding and drainage infrastructure. 6. Community, sport and cultural facilities. 7. Energy and telecommunications. 8. Utilities (gas, electricity and waste water). This annex also highlights gaps in provision (in the absence of funding or committed projects) and looks at how these can be addressed. Copies of these documents are available from our website at www.doncaster.gov.uk/localplan. The information is accurate as of spring 2019. The Doncaster Infrastructure Strategy will be updated as new information becomes available and infrastructure proposals are confirmed in more detail. 2 CHAPTER 1: TRANSPORTATION 1.1. Strategic transport infrastructure plays a key role in supporting the economic growth of the Borough and the wider Sheffield City Region.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Review of All Lane Running Motorways in England
    Report Independent Review of All Lane Running Motorways in England Sarah Simpson Client: Hyland Reference: PC1023-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0010 Status: Final/P02.00 Date: 29 March 2021 Project related HASKONINGDHV UK LTD. Rightwell House Rightwell East Bretton Peterborough PE3 8DW Transport & Planning VAT registration number: 792428892 +44 1733 334455 T +44 1733 262243 F [email protected] E royalhaskoningdhv.com W Document title: Independent Review of All Lane Running Motorways in England Document short title: Independent Review of ALR Reference: PC1023-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0010 Status: P02.00/Final Date: 29 March 2021 Project name: PC1023 ALR Project number: PC1023 Author(s): Sarah Simpson Drafted by: Sarah Simpson Checked by: Date: 29 March 2021 Approved by: Date: Classification Project related Unless otherwise agreed with the Client, no part of this document may be reproduced or made public or used for any purpose other than that for which the document was produced. HaskoningDHV UK Ltd. accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever for this document other than towards the Client.Please note: this document contains personal data of employees of HaskoningDHV UK Ltd.. Before publication or any other way of disclosing, this report needs to be anonymized. 29 March 2021 INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF ALR PC1023-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0010 i Project related Table of Contents Glossary of Terms and Acronyms vi Smart Motorways Timeline (England) ix Core Documents x Executive Summary 1 1 Introduction and Scope of Evidence 4 1.2 Context 5 1.3 Report Scope 5 2 Methodology
    [Show full text]