DOCSLIB.ORG

U.S.S. New Ironsides: the Seagoing Ironclad in the Union Navy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
U.S.S. New Ironsides: the Seagoing Ironclad in the Union Navy Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons History Theses & Dissertations History Winter 1992 U.S.S. New Ironsides: The eS agoing Ironclad in the Union Navy William Howard Roberts Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/history_etds Part of the Military History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Roberts, William H.. "U.S.S. New Ironsides: The eS agoing Ironclad in the Union Navy" (1992). Master of Arts (MA), thesis, History, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/mv9c-hp68 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/history_etds/31 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the History at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. U.S.S. NEW IRONSIDES: IHE SEAGOING IRONCLAD IN THE UNION NAVY by William Howard Roberts B.S. March 1973, Massachusetts Institute of Technology A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS HISTORY OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY December 20, 1992 Approvi L. Wilson (Director) Willard C. Frank. Jr. Patrick J.N«ollinsr^Roi Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ABSTRACT U.S.S. NEW IRONSIDES: THE SEAGOING IRONCLAD IN THE UNION NAV7 William Howard Roberts Old Dominion University, 1992 Director: Dr. Harold L. Wilson Of the ironclads completed by the Union during the Civil War, only the U.S.S. New Ironsides was a seagoing, high-freeboard design. Her seagoing qualities and heavy battery made her uniquely valuable to the Union in combat. Although New Ironsides was highly successful and her high- freeboard design squarely in the European mainstream, she represented the last of her direct line in the U.S. Navy. The lessons learned from her construction and wartime ser­ vice, which should have provided invaluable instruction for U.S. designers, were not followed up. By failing to develop the seagoing ironclad the United States forfeited the advan­ tages it might have gained over European navies from its extensive combat experience. The Navy was unable to con­ vince Congress that money for ironclads would be well spent, and the U.S. Navy's best opportunity to build a seagoing ironclad fleet was lost for a generation. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Copyright * by William Howard Roberts 1992 All Rights Reserved Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. To Peg Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS To Bill Jurens, for clear and forceful reworking of the original drawings and plans. To Barry Zerby, of the National Archives Military Re­ cords Branch, for hours of patient assistance with the Navy Department records. To Kris Weaver, for cogent and forceful criticism of innumerable drafts. To Dr. Charlie Peery, for his help in providing photo­ graphs and images of New Ironsides. To Coomie Lee and Dan Stedham, Pearl and Bob Sherman, and Sara and John Wepplo, for gracious hospitality to an itinerant researcher. ii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE LIST OF TABLES ....................................... iv LIST OF FIGURES ..................................... ... Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION: THE NEGLECTED IRONCLAD ............... 1 2. GENESIS: IMPETUS AND DESIGN ...................... 3 3. CONSTRUCTION HISTORY AND DESIGN EVOLUTION ......... 36 4. TEETHING TROUBLES: A "HOT-HOUSE” SHIP ........... 58 5. EARLY EXPERIENCE: CLEARING FOR ACTION ............. 77 6. BATTLE EXPERIENCE: "A CAPITAL SCARECROW"? ......... 93 7. COMBAT VETERAN: MATURE REFLECTION ............... 128 8. FINAL CAMPAIGNS: FORT FISHER AND JAMES RIVER . 165 9. CONTEMPORARIES AND COMPETITORS ................ 193 10. SEAGOING IRONCLADS: FAILURE OF WILL ..............208 11. CONCLUSION ...................................... 225 EPILOGUE............................................239 BIBLIOGRAPHICAL ESSAY .............................. 242 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY .............................. 250 APPENDICES A. SPECIFICATION OF WEIGHTS AND DISPLACEMENT . 269 B. SALVAGE AND FINAL DISPOSITION ............... 271 iii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 1. Comparison of New Ironsides. Gloire, and Warrior . 16 iv Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE 1. U.S.S. New Ironsides outboard profile ............. 17 2. French ironclad Gloire outboard profile ........... 18 3. U.S.S. New Ironsides Spar and Gun Deck Plans ........ 20 4. U.S.S. New Ironsides Berth Deck and Hold Plans .... 21 5. U.S.S. New Ironsides Deck Plans (Key) ............. 22 6. Tongued and Grooved Armor (Side V i e w ) .............. 24 7. U.S.S. New Ironsides Midship Section and sectional drawing of armor arrangement ...................... 26 8. Main Boiler of U.S.S. New Ironsides ................ 30 9. U.S.S. New Ironsides Screw and Rudder P l a n .......... 63 10. Iron Carriage and Slide for New Ironsides' Xl-inch Dahlgren gu n s ............................. 65 11. U.S.S. New Ironsides with masts and rigging ........ 76 12. U.S.S. New Ironsides under bare poles ............. 80 13. Outline chart of Charleston Harbor .............. 92 14. Typical Confederate barrel torpedo ............... 97 15. DuPont's plan of attack at Charleston............. 102 16. Body and Sheer Plan of U.S.S. New Ironsides .... 108 17. Damage to New Ironsides' armor from Confederate fire at Charleston .............................. 113 18. Confederate spar torpedo boat C.S.S. David .... 149 19. Fort Fisher and Vicinity ........................ 170 v Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 20. Plan of first attack on Fort Fisher ........ 174 21. Plan of second attack on Fort F i s h e r ............. 180 22. Map of the James R i v e r .......................... 187 vi Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION: THE NEGLECTED IRONCLAD I have never yet seen a vessel that came up to my ideas of what is required for offensive operations as much as the Ironsides.1 Admiral David Porter's words elicit little modern rec­ ognition. To most, "ironclad" is synonymous with "monitor," and scholars give New Ironsides but a few lines.2 Yet this seagoing broadside ironclad presented one of the earliest instances in which the U.S. Navy's tacticians and strate­ gists were forced to adapt to technological change. The new technology of iron and steam, pressed into service with neither precedent, wartime experience, nor sound theory to guide the designers, yielded both unanticipated strengths and unforeseen weaknesses. New Ironsides participated in more engagements and fired more shots than any other Civil War ironclad. Her strategic importance to the blockade of Charleston and her :Rear Admiral David D. Porter to Secretary of the Navy Gideon Welles, January 15, 1865, Official Records of the Union and Confederate Navies in the War of the Rebellion 28 vols. (Washington: GPO, 1894-1922) (hereafter ORN), 11: 602. All references are to Series One unless otherwise noted. 2James Phinney Baxter III, The Introduction of the Ironclad Warship (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1933; reprinted Hamden, CT: Archon Books, 1968), 268-69. This, his most extensive discussion of the ship, is 23 lines. 1 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. contributions to the bombardments of Charleston and Fort Fisher were unmatched. New Ironsides was in the mainstream of ironclad development; while the low freeboard monitors were an evolutionary dead end, New Ironsides was of the high freeboard line that led to the dreadnought battleship. Despite her highly successful career, New Ironsides herself had no direct descendant in the U.S. Navy. Her bright promise was neglected in the post-War reaction, and by the time the U.S. Navy again turned to seagoing iron­ clads, she had been forgotten. This is her story. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. CHAPTER TWO GENESIS: IMPETUS AND DESIGN By mid-1861, it was evident that the Union needed iron­ clad warships.1 The impetus was clear: a Confederate iron­ clad program was already underway. The Confederate Navy could not hope to challenge the U.S. Navy with conventional wooden ships, so Confederate Secretary of the Navy Stephen R. Mallory placed his faith not in numbers but in technolo­ gy. As he phrased the idea, "Inequality of numbers may be compensated by invulnerability."2 Although there were several Confederate projects un­ derway, the Federals worried most about the conversion of the partially destroyed frigate U.S.S. Merrimack into the ironclad C.S.S. Virginia.3 Virginia, being rebuilt at the Navy Yard at Portsmouth, Virginia, might threaten the Union JFor a discussion of the plans submitted before Welles reported to Congress, Baxter, Ironclad Warship. 238-45. 2Mallory to C. M. Conrad, Chairman
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Economist Was a Workhorse for the Confederacy and Her Owners, the Trenholm Firms, John Fraser & Co
    CONFEDERATE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION OF BELGIUM Nassau, Bahamas (Illustrated London News Feb. 10, 1864) By Ethel Nepveux During the war, the Economist was a workhorse for the Confederacy and her owners, the Trenholm firms, John Fraser & Co. of Charleston, South Carolina, and Fraser, Trenholm & Co. of Liverpool, England, and British Nassau and Bermuda. The story of the ship comes from bits and pieces of scattered information. She first appears in Savannah, Georgia, where the Confederate network (conspiracy) used her in their efforts to obtain war materials of every kind from England. President Davis sent Captain James Bulloch to England to buy an entire navy. Davis also sent Caleb Huse to purchase armaments and send them back home. Both checked in to the Fraser, Trenholm office in Liverpool which gave them office space and the Trenholm manager Charles Prioleau furnished credit for their contracts and purchases. Neither the men nor their government had money or credit. George Trenholm (last Secretary of the Treasury of the Confederacy) bought and Prioleau loaded a ship, the Bermuda, to test the Federal blockade that had been set up to keep the South from getting supplies from abroad. They sent the ship to Savannah, Georgia, in September 1861. The trip was so successful that the Confederates bought a ship, the Fingal. Huse bought the cargo and Captain Bulloch took her himself to Savannah where he had been born and was familiar with the harbor. The ship carried the largest store of armaments that had ever crossed the ocean. Bulloch left all his monetary affairs in the hands of Fraser, Trenholm & Co.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FEASIBLITY of the OVER-THE-HORIZON AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT for U.S. NAVY and MARINE CORPS FORCES a Thesis Presented To
    THE FEASIBLITY OF THE OVER-THE-HORIZON AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT FOR U.S. NAVY AND MARINE CORPS FORCES A thesis presented to the Faculty of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff Colege in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF MILITARY ART AND SCIENCE STEPHEN L. GOERTZEN, LCDR, USN B.S., U.S. Naval Academy, Annapolis, Maryland, 1982 Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 1993 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. MASTER OF MILITARY ART AND SCIENCE THESIS APPROVAL PAGE Name of Candidate: LCDR Stephen L. Goertzen, USN Thesis Title: The Feasibility of the Over-the-Horizon Amphibious Assault for the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps Forces Approved by: u , Thesis Committee Chaiman LTCOL W. A. Sp , Member Accepted this 4th day of June 1993 by: , Director, Graduate Degree Philip J. Brookes, Ph.D. Programs The opinions and conclusions expressed herein are those of the student author and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College or any other governmental agency. (References to this study should include the foregoing statement.) ABSTRACT THE FEASIBILITY OF THE OVER-THE-HORIZON AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT FOR U.S. NAVY AND MARINE CORPS FORCES: An analysis of the doctrine, equipment, and technology contributing to the feasibility of the over-the-horizon amphibious assault. By Lieutenant Commander Stephen L. Goertzen, USN, 128 pages. This study is an analysis of the tactics,techniques, procedures, doctrine, equipment, and technology utilized in over-the-horizon amphibious assaults. The study examines the issues surrounding current feasibility of the assault, as well as future feasibility of the assault.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4: Cultural and Historic Resources
    Ocean Special Area Management Plan Chapter 4: Cultural and Historic Resources Table of Contents 400 Introduction ......................................................................................................................3 410 Historic Contexts and Cultural Landscapes of the Ocean SAMP Area .......................4 410.1 Pre-Contact Geological History............................................................................5 410.2 Narragansett Tribal History.................................................................................6 410.3 European Exploration and Colonial Settlement Landscape Context .............16 410.4 Post-Colonial Cultural Landscape Context.......................................................18 410.5 Military Landscape Context ...............................................................................21 410.6 Fisheries Landscape Context ..............................................................................31 410.6.1 Rhode Island Fisheries.............................................................................31 410.6.2 Fishing and Subsistence on Block Island.................................................33 410.6.3 Historic Shipwrecks of Fishing Vessels ..................................................34 410.6.4 Historic Harbor Features..........................................................................35 410.7 Marine Transportation and Commercial Landscape Context........................35 410.8 Recreation and Tourism Landscape Context....................................................38
    [Show full text]
  • An Interview with Pearl Harbor Survivor Captain Victor Delano
    Dav of Infamy: An Interview with Pearl Harbor Survivor Captain Victor Delano Interviewer: Tom McMackin Instructor: Mr. Alex Haight Dale of Submission; February 12, 2007 OH MCM 2007 McMackin, Tom Tabic of Contents Inlerviewer/Interviewee release forms 2 Statement of Purpose 3 Biography 4-5 Historical Contextualization- "The origins and events ofthc attack on Pearl Harbor" 6-26 Interview Transcription 27-54 Interview Analysis 55-59 Appendix A 60 Time Indexing Recording Log 61 Works consuhed 62-63 ) St-Andrew's EPISCOPAL SCHOOL American Century Oral History Project Interviewee Release Form 1,. v/cr^(<V I CT^t^ - <^'XJ^l.^/^AJtP' hereby give and grant lo St. Andrew's (interviewee) Episcopal School the absolute and unqualified right to the use ofmy oral history memoir conducted by lor--x / ^ t.'/\i^L[^i r^ on \L / ["^ / oL I understand that (student interviewer) (date) the purpose of this project is lo collect audio- and video-taped oral histories of first-hand memories ofa particular period or event in history as part ofa classroom project (The American Century Project). I understand that these interviews (tapes and transcripts) will be deposited in the Saint Andrew's Episcopal School library and archives for the use by ftiture students, educators and researchers. Responsibility for the creation of derivative works will be at the discretion of the librarian, archivist and/or project coordinator. I also understand that the tapes and transcripts may be used in public presentations including, but not limited to, books, audio or video documentaries, slide-tape presentations, exhibits, articles, public performance, or presentation on the World Wide Web at the project's web site www.americancenturyproject.org or successor technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to loe removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI* Bell & Howell Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 WASHINGTON IRVING CHAMBERS: INNOVATION, PROFESSIONALIZATION, AND THE NEW NAVY, 1872-1919 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctorof Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Stephen Kenneth Stein, B.A., M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of the Introduction of Heavy Ordnance on the Development of the English Navy in the Early Tudor Period
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 8-1980 The Influence of the Introduction of Heavy Ordnance on the Development of the English Navy in the Early Tudor Period Kristin MacLeod Tomlin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation Tomlin, Kristin MacLeod, "The Influence of the Introduction of Heavy Ordnance on the Development of the English Navy in the Early Tudor Period" (1980). Master's Theses. 1921. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/1921 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE INFLUENCE OF THE INTRODUCTION OF HEAVY ORDNANCE ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ENGLISH NAVY IN THE EARLY TUDOR PERIOD by K ristin MacLeod Tomlin A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of History Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan August 1980 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis grew out of a paper prepared for a seminar at the University of Warwick in 1976-77. Since then, many persons have been invaluable in helping me to complete the work. I would like to express my thanks specifically to the personnel of the National Maritime Museum, Greenwich, England, and of the Public Records Office, London, for their help in locating sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Review by Howard J. Fuller University of Wolverhampton Department of War Studies
    A Global Forum for Naval Historical Scholarship International Journal of Naval History August 2009 Volume 8 Number 2 Ari Hoogenboom, Gustavus Vasa Fox of the Union Navy: A Biography. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008. 408 pp. 9 halftones, 10 line drawings. Review by Howard J. Fuller University of Wolverhampton Department of War Studies ________________________________________________________________________ Over a thousand pages long, the 1896 Naval History of the United States, by Willis J. Abbot, typically does not even mention Fox. “The story of the naval operations of the civil war is a record of wonderful energy and inventive skill in improving and building war vessels,” the story goes, and by the end of the conflict “the navy of the United States consisted of six hundred and seventy-one vessels. No nation of the world had such a naval power. The stern lessons of the great war had taught shipbuilders that wooden ships were a thing of the past. The little ‘Monitor’ had by one afternoon’s battle proved to all the sovereigns of Europe that their massive ships were useless,” (685-7). Of course the perception here is deterministic; it was a matter of American ‘destiny’ that the North would triumph, or even that the Union Navy would become a leading ironclad power—whatever that meant. Heroic naval admirals like Farragut, Porter and Du Pont seemed to operate under orders issued from behind a mysterious curtain back in Washington, D.C. We don’t see those hidden, historic actors who actually designed and launched the fine naval force Union officers wielded throughout the Civil War (often with mixed results).
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Assessment of Amphibious Operations from 1941 to the Present
    CRM D0006297.A2/ Final July 2002 Charting the Pathway to OMFTS: A Historical Assessment of Amphibious Operations From 1941 to the Present Carter A. Malkasian 4825 Mark Center Drive • Alexandria, Virginia 22311-1850 Approved for distribution: July 2002 c.. Expedit'onaryyystems & Support Team Integrated Systems and Operations Division This document represents the best opinion of CNA at the time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the Department of the Navy. Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. Specific authority: N0014-00-D-0700. For copies of this document call: CNA Document Control and Distribution Section at 703-824-2123. Copyright 0 2002 The CNA Corporation Contents Summary . 1 Introduction . 5 Methodology . 6 The U.S. Marine Corps’ new concept for forcible entry . 9 What is the purpose of amphibious warfare? . 15 Amphibious warfare and the strategic level of war . 15 Amphibious warfare and the operational level of war . 17 Historical changes in amphibious warfare . 19 Amphibious warfare in World War II . 19 The strategic environment . 19 Operational doctrine development and refinement . 21 World War II assault and area denial tactics. 26 Amphibious warfare during the Cold War . 28 Changes to the strategic context . 29 New operational approaches to amphibious warfare . 33 Cold war assault and area denial tactics . 35 Amphibious warfare, 1983–2002 . 42 Changes in the strategic, operational, and tactical context of warfare. 42 Post-cold war amphibious tactics . 44 Conclusion . 46 Key factors in the success of OMFTS. 49 Operational pause . 49 The causes of operational pause . 49 i Overcoming enemy resistance and the supply buildup.
    [Show full text]
  • A Souvenir of Massachusetts Legislators
    31<.*JI'il^L^\ ^S^lJ^HSI '^^^^mt^m':m:^^^'^^%^fm^.M^^. Wi:M:. Ctet^ 'Wm M^M^ m"^ ^p^^ 'i® i/v».«i lit *** t*/S - ®t- r^#fe ^^teii .^<;^ -r'.MAV-'iTfkj ^.ri91^!^ , ii A SOUVENIR iTla60ac§U0e^ts Begt0fatot0 1898. I'OLUME I'll. Issued Annually I A . M . B R I D G M A N STOUGHTON, MASS. Copyrighted iS^S hy A. M. BRIDGMAN, Half-tone and Text Print by Stoughton Record Print, Stoughton . HaH-tones from Photos, from Elmer Chickering, the "Royal Photographer," 21 West Street, F. Half-tones, Aznive Engraving Co., 375 Washington Street, Boston. PREFACE. The Editor of the Souvenir has had occasion to remark in previous editions that each Legislature has some peculiar characteristic to distinguish it from all others It fell to the lot of the Legislature of 1898, for the first time in over 30 years, or the usuil span of a generation, to make war preparations and to discuss war measures. The breaking out of the war with Spain found our Legislature rjady to do its part promptly and patriotically. With absolute unanimity and no more delay than was necessary for the making of the proper motions and the sig- nature of the bill by Governor Wolcott, the whole transaction occupying less than half an hour, the war appropriation of half a million dollars was voted ; and in the Senate the enactment of the measure was greeted with three cheers. No partisan discussion but patriotic action marked every measure of similar import. But this Souvenir is not intended as a record of what was done.
    [Show full text]
  • Zachary Taylor Writes from Mexico Holman Hamilton University of Kentucky
    The Kentucky Review Volume 1 | Number 3 Article 6 Spring 1980 "This most unnecessary & senseless war": Zachary Taylor Writes from Mexico Holman Hamilton University of Kentucky Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kentucky-review Part of the United States History Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Recommended Citation Hamilton, Holman (1980) ""This most unnecessary & senseless war": Zachary Taylor Writes from Mexico," The Kentucky Review: Vol. 1 : No. 3 , Article 6. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kentucky-review/vol1/iss3/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Kentucky Libraries at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Kentucky Review by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "This most unnecessary & senseless war": Zachary Taylor Writes from Mexico Holman Hamilton The presidential election year of 1980 seems an appropriate time to congratulate the University of Kentucky on acquiring a highly significant original letter, connected with a White House campaign of long ago. Zachary Taylor, who spent over half his life in Kentucky and lived here longer than any other chief executive, was within a few weeks of returning to the United States from the Mexican War when he sent this communication to his son-in-law, Dr. Robert C. Wood. Virtually all Taylor-to-Wood letters should be of absorbing interest to scholars because Major-General "Old Rough and Ready" Taylor esteemed and thoroughly trusted Ann Taylor Wood's husband.
    [Show full text]
  • Artillery Through the Ages, by Albert Manucy 1
    Artillery Through the Ages, by Albert Manucy 1 Artillery Through the Ages, by Albert Manucy The Project Gutenberg EBook of Artillery Through the Ages, by Albert Manucy This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org Title: Artillery Through the Ages A Short Illustrated History of Cannon, Emphasizing Types Used in America Author: Albert Manucy Release Date: January 30, 2007 [EBook #20483] Language: English Artillery Through the Ages, by Albert Manucy 2 Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ARTILLERY THROUGH THE AGES *** Produced by Juliet Sutherland, Christine P. Travers and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net ARTILLERY THROUGH THE AGES A Short Illustrated History of Cannon, Emphasizing Types Used in America UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fred A. Seaton, Secretary NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Conrad L. Wirth, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. -- Price 35 cents (Cover) FRENCH 12-POUNDER FIELD GUN (1700-1750) ARTILLERY THROUGH THE AGES A Short Illustrated History of Cannon, Emphasizing Types Used in America Artillery Through the Ages, by Albert Manucy 3 by ALBERT MANUCY Historian Southeastern National Monuments Drawings by Author Technical Review by Harold L. Peterson National Park Service Interpretive Series History No. 3 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1949 (Reprint 1956) Many of the types of cannon described in this booklet may be seen in areas of the National Park System throughout the country.
    [Show full text]
  • John Taylor Wood: Man of Action, Man of Honor
    The Cape Fear Civil War Round Table John Taylor Wood: Man of Action, Man of Honor By Tim Winstead History 454 December 4, 2009 On July 20, 1904, a short obituary note appeared on page seven of the New York Times. It simply stated, "Captain John Taylor Wood, grandson of President Zachary Taylor and nephew of Jefferson Davis, died in Halifax, N.S. yesterday, seventy-four years old." The note also stated that Wood served as a United States Navy midshipman, fought in the Mexican War, served as a Confederate army colonel on the staff of Jefferson Davis and Robert E. Lee's army, escaped the collapse of the Confederacy with General Breckinridge to Cuba, and was a resident of Halifax, Nova Scotia when he passed. In one paragraph, the obituary writer prepared the outline of the life of a man who participated in many of the major events of the American Civil War. John Taylor Wood's story was much more expansive and interwoven with the people and history of the Civil War era than the one paragraph credited to him by the Times. This paper examined the events in which Wood found himself immersed and sought to determine his role in those events. The main focus of the paper was Wood's exploits during his service to the Confederate States of America. His unique relationships with the leadership of the Confederacy ensured that he was close at hand when decisions were made which affected the outcome of the South's gamble for independence. Was John Taylor Wood the Forrest Gump of his day? Was it mere chance that Wood was at Hampton Roads on March 9, 1862, at Drewry's Bluff on May 15, 1862, abroad the USS Satellite in August 1863, aboard the USS Underwriter at New Berne in February 1864, abroad the CSS Tallahassee in August 1864, or with Jefferson Davis on the "unfortunate day" in Georgia on May 10, 1865? Was it only his relationship with Jefferson Davis that saw Wood engaged in these varied events? This paper examined these questions and sought to establish that it was Wood's competence and daring that placed him at the aforementioned actions and not Jefferson Davis's nepotism.
    [Show full text]