3-11 Noise and Vibration

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

3-11 Noise and Vibration THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Readers’ Guidance: This chapter reflects changes in impact analysis from that reported in the Draft EIR/EIS in April 2004. Please note that the although this Final EIR is being issued in order to take actions under the California Environmental Quality Act, the chapter also includes discussions of impacts under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The Construction Authority has opted to retain these NEPA discussions for the readers of and commenters on the Draft environmental document. In the future, the federal lead agency, the Federal Transit Administration, may issue a Final Environmental Impact Statement (Final EIS). THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK TABLE OF CONTENTS Topic Page VOLUME I: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................ i DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION.................................................................................................................. i Study Area and Study Corridor........................................................................................................ii CEQA AND NEPA DEFINITIONS OF IMPACT ...................................................................................... v Language Used in the Document..................................................................................................... v Explanation ...................................................................................................................................... v GLOSSARY ...............................................................................................................................................vii ACRONYMS............................................................................................................................................. xvi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................... ES-3 ES-2 STUDY AREA AND STUDY CORRIDOR............................................................................. ES-3 ES-3 PURPOSE AND NEED............................................................................................................. ES-5 ES-3.1 Summary of Purpose and Need .............................................................................. ES-5 ES-3.2 Development of Purpose and Need ........................................................................ ES-5 ES-4 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT STATUS .................................................................................. ES-11 ES-4.1 Development of Alternatives................................................................................ ES-11 ES-4.2 Alternatives Evaluated......................................................................................... ES-13 ES-5 ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS............................................................................................. ES-73 ES-5.1 Overview.............................................................................................................. ES-73 ES-5.2 Scoping................................................................................................................. ES-73 ES-5.3 Comments on the Draft EIS/EIR.......................................................................... ES-75 ES-5.4 Next Steps............................................................................................................ ES-76 ES-6 OVERVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS .............................................................. ES-77 ES-7 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS BY CITY.................................................................................... ES-81 ES-7.1 City of Pasadena................................................................................................... ES-81 ES-7.2 City of Arcadia..................................................................................................... ES-81 ES-7.3 City of Monrovia.................................................................................................. ES-82 ES-7.4 City of Duarte....................................................................................................... ES-82 ES-7.5 City of Irwindale.................................................................................................. ES-83 ES-7.6 City of Azusa........................................................................................................ ES-83 ES-7.7 City of Glendora................................................................................................... ES-84 ES-7.8 City of San Dimas ................................................................................................ ES-84 ES-7.9 City of La Verne................................................................................................... ES-85 ES-7.10 City of Pomona..................................................................................................... ES-85 ES-7.11 City of Claremont................................................................................................. ES-86 ES-7.12 City of Montclair.................................................................................................. ES-87 ES-8 MITIGATION ......................................................................................................................... ES-87 ES-8.1 Construction-Period Mitigation Measures to Be Applied in All Cities................ ES-87 ES-8.2 Long-term Mitigation Measures Applicable in All Cities.................................... ES-93 ES-9 FINANCIAL ANALYIS....................................................................................................... ES-106 Gold Line Foothill Extension – Pasadena to Montclair Final EIR page 1 February 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Topic Page ES-9.1 Capital Cost Estimates for Build Alternatives.................................................... ES-106 ES-9.2 Maintenance and Operations Facility................................................................. ES-107 ES-9.3 Operating and Maintenance Costs...................................................................... ES-107 ES-9.4 The Project Finance Plan.................................................................................... ES-108 ES-9.5 Financial Capability to Build and Operate ......................................................... ES-137 ES-9.6 Comparative Analysis of Alternatives ............................................................... ES-137 ES-10 PROPOSED FINDINGS ....................................................................................................... ES-142 ES-11 AGENCY COORDINATION............................................................................................... ES-143 ES-12 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND COMMENT .................................................................... ES-144 ES-12.1 Scoping Meetings............................................................................................... ES-144 ES-12.2 Other Meetings................................................................................................... ES-145 ES-12.3 Draft EIR/EIS Public Meetings ......................................................................... ES-146 ES-13 ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED/AREAS OF CONTROVERSY ............................................. ES-148 ES-13.1 Issues to Be Resolved......................................................................................... ES-148 ES-13.2 Areas of Controversy ......................................................................................... ES-149 ES-14 ENVIRONMENTALLY SUPERIOR ALTERNATIVE....................................................... ES-149 ES-15 PERMITS AND APPROVALS............................................................................................. ES-150 VOLUME II: FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT/ FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT CHAPTER 1 – PURPOSE AND NEED................................................................................................1-1 1-1 STUDY AREA AND STUDY CORRIDOR................................................................................1-1 1-2 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF PURPOSE AND NEED ...........................................................1-3 1-3 TRANSPORTATION CONDITIONS, PROBLEMS AND ISSUES ..........................................1-4 1-3.1 General Transportation Conditions and Problems ....................................................1-4 1-3.2 Population and Employment Factors ......................................................................1-12 1-3.3 Environmental Considerations................................................................................1-18 1-3.4 Corridor Transportation Planning Guidance ...........................................................1-19 CHAPTER 2 – ALTERNATIVES..........................................................................................................2-1 2-1 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS....................................................................................................2-3 2-1.1 Alternatives Analysis Process ...................................................................................2-3 2-1.2 Alternatives Screening Process.................................................................................2-8 2-1.3 Candidate Alternatives............................................................................................2-11 2-2 DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Recommended publications
  • Final Gold Line Report
    STRATEGIC PLANNING STUDY REPORT FOR METRO GOLD LINE FOOTHILL EXTENSION TO LA/ONTARIO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PREPARED FOR Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Construction Authority Funded By San Bernardino Associated Governments and The Southern California Association of Governments December 2008 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Construction Authority Southern California Association of Governments San Bernardino Associated Governments San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors Los Angeles World Airports PREPARED BY: KOA Corporation In Association with: STV Incorporated J.L. Patterson & Associates, INC. Consensus Planning Group, Inc. CITYWORKS DESIGN Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension to LA/Ontario International Airport Strategic Planning Study Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... E-1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................................................. E-1 PLANNING TEAM APPROACH AND PUBLIC OUTREACH .......................................................................................................... E-1 THE ALIGNMENTS ........................................................................................................................................................................ E-2 ADDITIONAL STUDY CONSIDERATIONS ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • El Monte Station Connections Foothilltransit.Org
    metro.net El Monte Station Connections foothilltransit.org BUSWAY 10 Greyhound Foothill Transit El Monte Station Upper Level FT Silver Streak Discharge Only FT486 FT488 FT492 Eastbound Metro ExpressLanes Walk-in Center Discharge 24 25 26 27 28 Only Bus stop for: 23 EMT Red, EMT Green EMS Civic Ctr Main Entrance Upper Level Bus Bays for All Service B 29 22 21 20 19 18 Greyhound FT481 FT Silver Streak Metro Silver Line Metro Bike Hub FT494 Westbound RAMONA BL RAMONA BL A Bus stop for: EMS Flair Park (am/pm) Metro Parking Structure Division 9 Building SANTA ANITA AV El Monte Station Lower Level 1 Bus Bay A Bus Stop (on street) 267 268 487 190 194 FT178 FT269 FT282 2 Metro Rapid 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Bus Bay 577X Metro Silver Line 8 18 Bus Bay Lower Level Bus Bays Elevator 76 Escalator 17 Bike Rail 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 EMS Bike Parking 270 176 Discharge Only Commuter 770 70 Connection Parking Building 13-0879 ©2012 LACMTA DEC 2012 Subject to Change Destinations Lines Bus Bay or Destinations Lines Bus Bay or Destinations Lines Bus Bay or Street Stop Street Stop Street Stop 7th St/Metro Center Rail Station Metro Silver Line 18 19 Hacienda Heights FT282 16 Pershing Square Metro Rail Station Metro Silver Line , 70, 76, 770, 1 2 17 18 37th St/USC Transitway Station Metro Silver Line 18 19 FT Silver Streak 19 20 21 Harbor Fwy Metro Rail Station Metro Silver Line 18 19 Pomona TransCenter ÅÍ FT Silver Streak 28 Alhambra 76, 176 6 17 Highland Park 176 6 Altadena 267, 268 9 10 Puente Hills Mall FT178, FT282 14 16 Industry Å 194, FT282 13 16 Arcadia 268,
    [Show full text]
  • Metrolink Schedule Upland to Los Angeles
    Metrolink Schedule Upland To Los Angeles Henrik bestializes characteristically. Circulable Neale jugged or slip-on some Orson Germanically, however unpopulated Patric wooden collusively or cached. Baron propagandizes her athrocytosis unsuitably, extremist and untransmitted. Bike racks and start using both tracks or. Premier Virtual Office could fund the right solution soon you. Are several different ways to make sure to assengers with and rancho cucamonga, y día de navidad se pueden abordar estos trenes gratuitamente. DE FERIADOSMetrolink tendrá un horario de domingo en los siguientes días festivos; el día de año nuevo, el día de conmemoración, día de la independencia, día del trabajo, día de acción de gracias, y día de navidad se observaran. Downstairs downtown los angeles bus and upland and vietnamese. At metrolink projects include a taxi, upland chamber of. Maybe you to metrolink ticket to get away. There seems like there are five named trains operate on metrolink station city. Step not your quarantine cooking with this correspond to nonstick cookware. The upland and the cheapest bus to change often and reload window. Are you tired of meeting with clients in noisy coffee shops? Determine the formal process handbook which an eliminate a Metrolink station, building that whole station cannot agree. South toward free trip is required to metrolink schedule upland to los angeles. Across wall street is by hour parking. In addition with both short term is long daily office produce, this Mission Viejo location also offers hourly and day offices to accommodate my business need.
    [Show full text]
  • Go Car-Free to LAX with Metrolink and Flyaway®
    April/May 2013 METROLINK NEWS AND EVENTS Metrolink introduces new Go car-free to LAX with TAP-enabled tickets Metrolink and FlyAway® Metrolink continues to offer the “golden ticket” throughout the region, providing Paying for the LAX connections to nearly 30 other public transportation providers at no additional FlyAway® bus will cost. Metrolink riders have always been able to transfer seamlessly to all Metro soon get a little easier subway, light rail and for Metrolink riders. If bus lines. This will you’re traveling to LAX, continue as Metro you no longer have to purchase a separate latches its turnstiles ticket to ride the FlyAway® starting April leading to its Red 22. Metrolink, in partnership with the Los and Purple Lines Angeles World Airports (LAWA), will give this June. you the option of adding the $7 cost of a As mentioned in one-way LAX FlyAway® trip to the cost of the December/ your Metrolink ticket. January issue of Metrolink Matters, All you have to do is go to any Metrolink Ticket Metrolink and Vending Machine and simply select LAX as your Metro have worked final destination when purchasing your ticket, collaboratively to take the train to L.A. Union Station and board create a Metrolink the FlyAway®. The buses run seven days a ticket that is week and every 30 minutes during peak hours. compatible with the The added ticket feature applies to the following Metro TAP system. Metrolink tickets: One-Way Tickets, Round-Trip TAP-enabled tickets Tickets and Advance Purchase Tickets. You can will be dispensed from Metrolink buy One-Way or Round-Trip Advance Purchase Ticket Vending Machines (TVMs) and will allow passage through Metro’s Tickets for a future date, up to one year in turnstiles, which are scheduled to be latched this summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Station Area Connections
    metro.net Union Station Area Connections 1 Destinations Lines Stops Scale One Unit: /4 Mile Chinese Historical Lincoln/Cypress Station Society Chinatown Alhambra 76, 78, 79, 378, 485 B CL 5 8 7 BE Heritage and Altadena via Lake 485 7 A 1 Metro Local Stop RN Visitors Center Arcadia 78, 79, 378 B C AR T Metro Local and D S Artesia Transit Center n Metro Silver Line n J 1 S A RapidL Stop Y T G Baldwin Park Metro Silver Line n to 190 N Å K A W I ST I Chung King Chinese R E Beverly Hills Metro Purple Line o to 20, 720; 704 5 Metro Rapid Line UM Bamboo R Los Angeles S N I Cultural P EY T D Road Art Plaza State S W S Bob Hope Airport (BUR) ÅÍ 94, 794, Metrolink Å, Amtrak Í W 2 N A BA T C Center D Galleries HU M N Metro Silver Line Stop S NG B Historical 110 D K o E I O A U Boyle Heights Metro Gold Line , 30, 68, 770 B R N CP T G C O G T L A N T S I N Park N A Mandarin K G 5 7 I N Broadway 30, 40, 42, 730, 740, 745 A O N FIN G L E IN L N N Metro Silver Line G W N B U Y Plaza P R H E Burbank Å 94, 96, 794 W 2 O C I E E Paci>c L L N C Y D T T E Cal Poly Pomona Metro Silver Line n to 190, 194 K Metro Rail StationT A S M E JU L S W Alliance N Y U G J R Y I W F N and Entrance G L n S W W Y Carson Metro Silver Line to 246 J Medical Y N G U R B O N E T M A I R O L N P A N I 5 6 O E T Center U L Y Century City 704, 728, CE534 E 3 O W R E D S D S M L A E E W I T Metro Red LineA C M U S E IN O O W G A N Y U S City Terrace 70, 71 E B C I P L V O F LE L T n N M Covina Å Metro Silver Line to 190 K Metro Purple Line G L IN E A S Crenshaw District 40, 42, 740
    [Show full text]
  • System-Wide Transit Corridor Plan for the San Bernardino Valley
    System-Wide Transit Corridor Plan for the San Bernardino Valley sbX E Street Corridor BRT Project Prepared for: Omnitrans Prepared by: Parsons Patti Post & Associates October 2010 This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 5 1.1 SAFETEA-LU ............................................................................................................ 6 1.2 2004 System-Wide Plan ............................................................................................ 7 1.3 Development of the E Street Corridor ....................................................................... 7 1.4 California SB 375 .................................................................................................... 17 1.5 San Bernardino County Long Range Transit Plan ................................................... 18 1.6 Regionally Approved Travel Demand Model ........................................................... 21 1.7 Roles and Responsibilities ...................................................................................... 21 1.8 Opportunities to Shape Development/Redevelopment ............................................ 21 1.8.1 Economic Development ............................................................................. 21 1.8.2 Transit-Oriented Developments ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ARRIVE CORRIDOR FINAL REPORT TOC:1 Table of Contents
    A DVANCED R EGIONAL R AIL I NTEG R ATED V I S ION E A S T THE A rr IVE CO rr IDO R FINAL REPORT SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 Prepared by: Gruen Associates HR&A Advisors, Inc. HDR Funding: The preparation of this report has been financed in part through grant funds from the United States Department of Transportation and the State of California Department of Conservation. In addition, the work upon which this publication is based was funded in part through a grant awarded by the Strategic Growth Council under Grant Number 3010-541, and the San Bernardino Associated Governments. The contents of this report reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The statements and conclusions of this report are those of the Consultant and not necessarily those of the Strate- gic Growth Council or of the State of California Department of Conservation, or its employees. In addition, the contents do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of SCAG or the San Bernardino Association of Governments (SANBAG). This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. The Strategic Growth Council, the California Department of Conservation, SANBAG and SCAG make no warranties, express or implied, and assume no liability for the information contained in the succeeding text. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................... 1:1 1.1 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND................................................................................................. 1:2 1.1.1 Metrolink Commuter Rail – San Bernardino Metrolink Line.............................................. 1:2 1.1.2 Transit/Land Use Integration and Benefits......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BUS BOOK MECH B 11/29/10 3:09 PM Page 1
    BUS BOOK MECH B 11/29/10 3:09 PM Page 1 C M Y CM MY CY CMY K BUSRoutes and Schedules Effective January 3,BOOK 2011 to May 2, 2011 RESOLVE TO RIDE. 1-800-9-OMNIBUS OMNITRANS.ORG Welcome Aboard! Table of Contents Pass Outlets 2-3 Expendios de pases Passes by Mail 96 Pases por correo Fare Information 4-6 Información del precio Calendar 3 Calendario How to Ride 7-10 Cómo Viajar Transfer Centers 11-13 Centros de transbordo Destinations 14 Destinos Telephone Numbers 15 Números de teléfono Bike & Ride 16 Pedalear y viajar Wheelchair Lift 17 Elevador para sillas de ruedas Route Maps & Schedules 18-91 Mapas y horarios de rutas Access, Omnilink 92 - 95 Access, Omnilink WHAT’S NEW NOVEDADES What’s new for January? Only minor changes to a few of ¿Qué hay de nuevo para enero? Solo cambios menores a our routes. Maps for Routes 3-4 and 82 will reflect minor algunos de nuestros recorridos. Los mapas de los changes in routing and service enhancements. recorridos 3-4 y 82 reflejarán cambios menores en los recorridos y mejoras del servicio. Routes 3-4 Run time changes to all days. Routing El horario del recorrido de las rutas 3-4 ha cambiado around the 4th Street Transit Mall has been altered and para todos los días. El recorrido por 4th Street Transit the time point has been moved to Court and E Streets. Mall ha sido modificado y el cartel con los horarios ha sido llevado a las calles Court y E Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Directors Meeting November 6, 2019 10:00 Am
    AGENDA Board of Directors Meeting November 6, 2019 10:00 a.m. LOCATION San Bernardino County Transportation Authority Santa Fe Depot – First Floor Lobby Board Room 1170 W. 3rd Street, San Bernardino, CA Board of Directors President Larry McCallon, Mayor Pro Tem Jim Cox, Council Member Darcy McNaboe, Mayor City of Highland City of Victorville City of Grand Terrace Rhodes “Dusty” Rigsby, Mayor David Avila, Mayor Pro Tem Vice-President City of Loma Linda City of Yucaipa Frank Navarro, Mayor City of Colton John Dutrey, Mayor Rick Denison, Council Member City of Montclair Town of Yucca Valley Gabriel Reyes, Mayor City of Adelanto Edward Paget, Vice Mayor Robert Lovingood, Supervisor City of Needles County of San Bernardino Art Bishop, Council Member Town of Apple Valley Alan Wapner, Council Member Janice Rutherford, Supervisor City of Ontario County of San Bernardino Julie McIntyre, Mayor City of Barstow L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Dawn Rowe, Supervisor City of Rancho Cucamonga County of San Bernardino Bill Jahn, Council Member City of Big Bear Lake Toni Momberger, Council Member Curt Hagman, Supervisor City of Redlands County of San Bernardino Eunice Ulloa, Mayor City of Chino Deborah Robertson, Mayor Josie Gonzales, Supervisor City of Rialto County of San Bernardino Ray Marquez, Council Member City of Chino Hills John Valdivia, Mayor Michael Beauchamp, Caltrans City of San Bernardino Ex-Officio Member Acquanetta Warren, Mayor City of Fontana Joel Klink, Mayor Pro Tem Ray Wolfe, Executive Director City of Twentynine Palms Rebekah Swanson, Council Member Julianna Tillquist, General Counsel City of Hesperia Debbie Stone, Mayor City of Upland San Bernardino County Transportation Authority San Bernardino Council of Governments AGENDA Board of Directors November 6, 2019 10:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Passenger Rail
    TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PASSENGER RAIL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TECHNICAL REPORT DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 2 REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE 2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 3 ANALYTICAL APPROACH 5 EXISTING CONDITIONS 6 STRATEGIES 27 NEXT STEPS 44 CONCLUSION 45 TECHNICAL REPORT PASSENGER RAIL DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT connectsocal.org EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM This Connect SoCal Passenger Rail report lays out a vision of passenger rail services for the SCAG Region for the next three decades. It demonstrates Passenger Rail the progress that has been made over the last two decades in terms of growing ridership, new rail services, capital improvements and new funding opportunities. It demonstrates the regional importance and significance of passenger rail in the SCAG region, and why growing rail services by increasing frequencies in underserved corridors, as well as establishing service in unserved markets, is crucial to the future mobility and sustainability of our region. The report highlights recent success in establishing new funding opportunities for passenger rail, including the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) and Senate Bill (SB) 1. Amtrak’s Pacific Surfliner intercity rail service is benefiting from these new funding opportunities as well as recent institutional arrangements that establish local control for the service. The Southern California Regional Rail Authority’s (SCRRA) Southern California Optimized Rail Expansion (SCORE) program is an ambitious
    [Show full text]
  • San Bernardino Associated Governments
    San Bernardino County Maglev to Las Vegas Los Angeles County San Bernardino County KENDALL RIVERSIDE Long Range Transit Plan 40TH RANCHO CUCAMONGA 15 215 Final ReportSIERRA TC STATE 20TH HIGHLAND 210 210 19TH DEL ROSA EUCLID ETIWANDA FONTANA E AYALA MILLIKEN HIGHLAND BASELINE PALM CARNELIAN BASELINE WATERMAN STERLING BOULDER UPLAND ARCHIBALD 9TH MEDICAL CENT ER CITRUS GREENSPOT CHURCH HAVEN SIERRA RIALTO 5TH 3RD Metro Gold FOOTHILL 2ND Line to RIALTO TC ARROW Pasadena G CHERRY 210 ARROWHEAD SAN BERNARDINO JERSEY ALDER MT MT VERNON MILL 2 SIERRA TC 2 TC MERRILL 2 RANCHO 6TH ORANGE VINEYARD MONTEVISTA STATE 38 4TH SAN BERNARDINO TIPPECANOE MOUNTAIN 10 MILL CREEK To Pomona RIVERSIDE CLEVELAND TC LUGONIA MONTCLAIR INLAND EMPIRE ONTARIO MILLS VALLEY G ALABAMA Transcenter PEPPER HOSPITALITY REDLAND S HOLT SP AIRPORT CALIFORNIA TC TC LA CADENA STATE ANDERSON CITRUS SANTA ANA TC 9TH CRAFTON CACTUS CAJON WABASH SAND CANYON MISSION 15 BARTON JURUPA LOCUST ONTARIO CEDAR COLTON WASHINGTON TC YUCAIPA BRYANT FRANCIS MT VERNON LOMA LINDA 2 MILLIKEN CYPRESS YUCAIPA CENTRAL PHILADELPHIA 2 MU LBERRY 10 60 215 AVENUE E WALNUT REDLANDS HAVEN GROVE GRAND TERRACE RAMONA RIVERSIDE ARCHIBALD CHINO TC Riverside County GRAND Replace RTA EDISON SANANTONIO Route 36 PEYTON CHINO HILLS CHINO In Association with KIMBALL GROVE Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. To Cal Poly To LimonitePatti Post & Associates Pomona Shopping Center Vision BRT Routes San Bernardino Avenue Vision Maglev TC Transit Center CHINO HILLS M.I.G. E Street Grand/Edison Avenues Vision Rail
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I Written Public Scoping Comments DOCUMENT CONTROL ROUTING SLIP
    Appendix I Written Public Scoping Comments DOCUMENT CONTROL ROUTING SLIP Date: 1/18/2011 Incoming CIN#: Company Code: CTZ - Citizen File Code(s): Ltr. No: Description: Ltr; from a citizen Mrs. Fay Carpenter –Support of Gold Line Phase I: _____ Phase IIA: __X__ Phase IIB: ____ Phase IIC: _____ Distribution: This document was forwarded to the following project staff. Should you require additional distributions, please return the routing sheet with any comments or routing/copying instructions. Initial Action Staff Signed Info/Input Due By: Required Required Balian, Habib Beltran, Sylvia Burner, Chris Craig, Natasha Esguerra, Marissa Gonzalez, Rodrigo Jue, Crandal Levy Buch, Lisa X Lowe, Chris Manning, Linda Purcell, Mitch Sims, Jerry CEO Tracking Counsel: Danner, Regina Estrada, Mike Snow, David Consultants: Baker, Gary Cournoyer, Denis Dinets, Phil Elwood, Lesley Espinosa, Richard Flores, Jennifer Flynn, Pat Gharib, Greg Gonzalez, Jose Hiramoto, Reky Laygo, Rodolfo Levinson, Connie Lucci, Bill Pankratz, Dain Patsaouras, Tanya Roskowick, Kristin Skoury, John Vogel, Margaux OTHER: Original document has been given to the person indicated. A copy has been retained for Document Control files. Comments/Additional Actions: (Please Return to Document Control.) Revised 12/31/2010 649 Purdue Drive Claremont, CA 917 ll-3417 January 14,20Il Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension ConstructionAuthori8 406E. Huntington Drive, Suite 202 Monrovia, CA 91016 Attn: Lisa Levy Buch Dear Ms. Levy Buch: I am writing to say that as a California tax payer, I am very supportive of the extension of the Metro Gold Line light rail project from Azusa to Montclair. In reality the Gold Line or one of the other Metro lines should be extended to the Ontario airport.
    [Show full text]